浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1969-1980.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20241019
王婷1(
), 范宇鑫1, 王惠2, 杜荆山1, 石秋环2, 王玉洁2,*(
), 申洪涛3,*(
), 王艳芳1, 奚家勤4, 刘领1
收稿日期:2024-11-22
出版日期:2025-09-25
发布日期:2025-10-15
作者简介:王玉洁,E-mail:wyjanguie@126.com;申洪涛,E-mail:shtluoyang@126.com通讯作者:
王玉洁,申洪涛
基金资助:
WANG Ting1(
), FAN Yuxin1, WANG Hui2, DU Jingshan1, SHI Qiuhuan2, WANG Yujie2,*(
), SHEN Hongtao3,*(
), WANG Yanfang1, XI Jiaqin4, LIU Ling1
Received:2024-11-22
Online:2025-09-25
Published:2025-10-15
Contact:
WANG Yujie,SHEN Hongtao
摘要: 为了改善洛阳初烤烟叶的内在质量,提升初烤微带青烟叶的工业利用价值,以洛阳LY1306品系上部(B2V)和中部(C3V)的烟叶为试验材料,在原烟贮存环节,将甲基营养型芽孢杆菌(Bacillus methylotrophicus)(JLZY-5)的菌液设置4个梯度CK(0)、S1(12%)、S2(24%)、S3(36%),将其分别喷施于初烤微带青烟叶的上部(B2V)和中部(C3V),测定微生物对初烤微带青烟叶的感官评吸质量、化学成分含量及协调性的影响,探讨利用微生物调控初烤烟叶醇化过程可行性。结果表明:上部和中部微带青烟叶香气质、香气量、余味、杂气、刺激性和感官评吸总分均随醇化时间的延长呈上升趋势,喷施甲基营养型芽孢杆菌可以有效提高烟叶感官评吸总分,改善烟叶评吸质量,S2处理在醇化过程中效果最好;上部和中部微带青烟叶总植物碱、总氮和淀粉含量受菌剂喷施影响而降低(中部烟叶S1和S3处理总植物碱含量除外),还原糖和总糖含量受菌剂喷施影响含量升高(中部烟叶S1处理除外),而钾和氯含量几乎不受喷施影响。总体可见,初烤微带青烟叶的化学成分协调性提高,均表现为S2处理效果最佳,提高了烟叶质量,拓宽了微带青烟叶的应用范围。研究结果为微生物调控初烤烟叶醇化进程和醇化质量提供了技术途径和理论依据。
中图分类号:
王婷, 范宇鑫, 王惠, 杜荆山, 石秋环, 王玉洁, 申洪涛, 王艳芳, 奚家勤, 刘领. 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对初烤微带青烟叶化学成分含量及协调性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1969-1980.
WANG Ting, FAN Yuxin, WANG Hui, DU Jingshan, SHI Qiuhuan, WANG Yujie, SHEN Hongtao, WANG Yanfang, XI Jiaqin, LIU Ling. Influence of Bacillus methylotrophicus on contents and coordination of chemical composition based on the primary-cured greenish tobacco[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1969-1980.
| 等级 Level | 处理 Treatment | 醇化时间/月 Aging time/month | 香气质 Aroma quality | 香气量 Aroma quantity | 余味 Aftertaste | 杂气 Offensive odor | 刺激性 Irritancy | 总分 Total score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2V | CK | 1 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 60.4 | |
| 2 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 61.6 | |||
| 3 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 62.2 | |||
| 4 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 62.8 | |||
| 5 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 63.5 | |||
| 6 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 64.2 | |||
| S1 | 1 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 63.6 | ||
| 2 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 65.6 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.2 | |||
| 4 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.5 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.9 | |||
| S2 | 1 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 63.8 | ||
| 2 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 65.9 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.2 | |||
| 4 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.5 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 68.1 | |||
| S3 | 1 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 63.4 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 65.9 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.0 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 66.6 | |||
| 5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 6 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 67.0 | |||
| C3V | CK | 1 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 61.8 | |
| 2 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 63.6 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 65.0 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 65.4 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 66.2 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 66.5 | |||
| S1 | 1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 65.1 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.2 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 67.2 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 67.8 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.9 | |||
| S2 | 1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 65.1 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.5 | |||
| 3 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 67.1 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 67.4 | |||
| 5 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 68.3 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 68.0 | |||
| S3 | 1 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 64.6 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 66.4 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 65.9 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 67.3 | |||
| 5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 67.0 | |||
| 6 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 66.9 |
表1 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌处理的微带青烟叶在醇化过程中的感官质量评分
Table 1 Sensory quality score of primary-cured greenish tobacco leaves treated by Bacillus methylotrophicus during aging
| 等级 Level | 处理 Treatment | 醇化时间/月 Aging time/month | 香气质 Aroma quality | 香气量 Aroma quantity | 余味 Aftertaste | 杂气 Offensive odor | 刺激性 Irritancy | 总分 Total score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2V | CK | 1 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 60.4 | |
| 2 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 61.6 | |||
| 3 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 62.2 | |||
| 4 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 62.8 | |||
| 5 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 63.5 | |||
| 6 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 64.2 | |||
| S1 | 1 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 63.6 | ||
| 2 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 65.6 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.2 | |||
| 4 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.5 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.9 | |||
| S2 | 1 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 63.8 | ||
| 2 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 65.9 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.2 | |||
| 4 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.5 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 68.1 | |||
| S3 | 1 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 63.4 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 65.9 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.0 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 66.6 | |||
| 5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 6 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 67.0 | |||
| C3V | CK | 1 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 61.8 | |
| 2 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 63.6 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 65.0 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 65.4 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 66.2 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 66.5 | |||
| S1 | 1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 65.1 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.2 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 66.8 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 67.2 | |||
| 5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 67.8 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 67.9 | |||
| S2 | 1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 65.1 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 66.5 | |||
| 3 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 67.1 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 67.4 | |||
| 5 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 68.3 | |||
| 6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 68.0 | |||
| S3 | 1 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 64.6 | ||
| 2 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 66.4 | |||
| 3 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 65.9 | |||
| 4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 67.3 | |||
| 5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 67.0 | |||
| 6 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 66.9 |
图2 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对微带青烟叶醇化过程中总植物碱和总氮含量的影响 CK、S1、S2、S3,体积分数分别为0、12%、24%、36%的甲基营养型芽孢杆菌处理。下同。
Fig.2 Effects of Bacillus methylotrophicus on the contents of total plant alkaloids and total nitrogen of primary cured greenish tobacco leaves during aging CK, S1, S2, and S3, Treatments with Bacillus methylotrophicus at volume fractions of 0, 12%, 24%, and 36%, respectively.The same as below.
图3 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对微带青烟叶醇化过程中还原糖和总糖的影响
Fig.3 Effects of Bacillus methylotrophicus on the contents of reducing sugar and total sugar of primary-cured greenish tobacco leaves during aging
图4 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对微带青烟叶醇化过程中钾和氯含量的影响
Fig.4 Effects of Bacillus methylotrophicus on the contents of potassium and chlorine of primary-cured greenish tobacco leaves during aging
图7 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对上部微带青烟叶醇化过程中协调性指标的影响
Fig.7 Effects of Bacillus methylotrophicus on the chemical composition coordination of primary-cured greenish upper tobacco leaves during aging
图8 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对中部微带青烟叶醇化过程中协调性指标的影响
Fig.8 Effects of Bacillus methylotrophicus on the chemical composition coordination of primary-cured greenish middle tobacco leaves during aging
| [1] | 李秀妮, 李猛, 万德建, 等. 烟叶微生物及其在烟叶发酵和醇化中的作用研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2019, 46(6): 1520-1529. |
| LI X N, LI M, WAN D J, et al. Role of microorganisms in tobacco fermentation and alcoholization: a review[J]. Microbiology China, 2019, 46(6): 1520-1529. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 王发勇, 王玉真, 刘泽, 等. 醇化过程中云南清香型烟叶的化学成分分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(8): 1671-1676. |
| WANG F Y, WANG Y Z, LIU Z, et al. Chemical composition analysis of clear flavor tobacco leaf during maturation in Yunnan province[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 36(8): 1671-1676. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 范宇鑫, 王丽君, 白峰, 等. 福建南平复烤片烟自然醇化过程中化学成分及感官质量变化分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(1): 190-196. |
| FAN Y X, WANG L J, BAI F, et al. Analysis on the changes of chemical components and sensory quality of Fujian Nanping redried tobacco strips during natural aging[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 190-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 张晓莉, 元野, 位辉琴, 等. 牡丹江片烟在河南仓储自然醇化过程中的质量变化[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(4): 170-180. |
| ZHANG X L, YUAN Y, WEI H Q, et al. Quality changes of Mudanjiang tobacco strips during natural aging in warehouse of Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(4): 170-180. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 柳均, 汪宏毅, 覃光炯, 等. 初烤烟叶空间颜色指标与化学成分关系的研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 34(2): 284-289. |
| LIU J, WANG H Y, QIN G J, et al. The linkage of colors and chemical components within flue-cured tobacco leaves[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Natural Science), 2019, 34(2): 284-289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 李模坤. 烤烟正组内混入微带青烟叶的原因调查及分析[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2012, 53(11): 87-88. |
| LI M K. Investigation and analysis of causes of microstrip green tobacco mixed in the tobacco group[J]. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 53(11): 87-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 方志鹏, 俞玉发, 潘照芬, 等. 喷施不同生物制剂对采青烟叶变黄及品质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 74-79. |
| FANG Z P, YU Y F, PAN Z F, et al. Effects of spraying different biological agents on immature tobacco yellowing and quality[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(4): 74-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 张碰元, 黄家乐, 刘远上, 等. 醇化方式对津巴布韦烟叶微生物和香味成分的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2023, 56(3): 6-16. |
| ZHANG P Y, HUANG J L, LIU Y S, et al. Effects of aging methods on microorganisms and aroma components of Zimbabwe tobacco leaves[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2023, 56(3): 6-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 张涛, 蒋弢, 赵正雄, 等. 硃砂烟醇化过程中生物碱与致香成分变化规律研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 14-22. |
| ZHANG T, JIANG T, ZHAO Z X, et al. Study on changes of alkaloids and aromatic components in cherry-red tobacco during aging process[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2023, 35(5): 14-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 王玉华, 姜振玲, 崔志军, 等. 醇化过程中上部烟叶芳香族氨基酸降解产物变化及其与感官品质的关系[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(19): 185-188. |
| WANG Y H, JIANG Z L, CUI Z J, et al. Changes of aromatic amino acid degradation products in upper tobacco leaves during aging process and its relationship with sensory quality[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(19): 185-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 张佳佳, 过伟民, 翟振, 等. 不同香型区烤烟水溶性糖组分含量差异及与感官质量的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(4): 67-72. |
| ZHANG J J, GUO W M, ZHAI Z, et al. Regional differences in water-soluble sugar components and content of flue-cured tobacco and their relationship with sensory quality[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2021, 42(4): 67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 张志灵, 陈庆文, 林海滨, 等. 硒粉催化-连续流动分析法测定烟叶中总氮的含量[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2024, 60(3): 305-308. |
| ZHANG Z L, CHEN Q W, LIN H B, et al. Determination of total nitrogen in tobacco by selenium powder catalysis-continuous flow analysis[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part B:Chemical Analysis), 2024, 60(3): 305-308. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 林海滨. 连续流动法测定烟草中总植物碱含量的不确定度[J]. 福建分析测试, 2021, 30(5): 55-59. |
| LIN H B. Evaluation of uncertainty for the determination of nicotine content in tobacco using continuous flow method[J]. Fujian Analysis & Testing, 2021, 30(5): 55-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 李湘伟, 谢新乔, 杨继周, 等. 烤烟钾、氯质量分数及钾氯比对致香物质含量的影响[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2021, 43(6): 31-39. |
| LI X W, XIE X Q, YANG J Z, et al. Effects of potassium chlorine quality scores and potassium-chlorine ratio on aroma content in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Kunming University, 2021, 43(6): 31-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 张阳, 屠乃美, 陈舜尧, 等. 气候因子对湘东茶陵烟区烤烟氯、钾含量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(5): 60-67. |
| ZHANG Y, TU N M, CHEN S Y, et al. Effects of climate factors on chlorine and potassium contents of flue-cured tobacco in eastern Hunan[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2020, 41(5): 60-67. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 王佩, 王涛, 宋江雨, 等. 不同烘烤工艺对烟草CB-1上部叶抗性淀粉含量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(2): 162-170. |
| WANG P, WANG T, SONG J Y, et al. Effects of different curing techniques on resistant starch content in upper leaves of tobacco CB-1[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(2): 162-170. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 朴永革, 张贾宝, 崔成哲, 等. 烟草非挥发性有机酸、pH测定及其相关性分析[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(2): 32-39. |
| PIAO Y G, ZHANG J B, CUI C Z, et al. Determination and correlation analysis of tobacco non-volatile organic acids and pH[J]. Food & Machinery, 2022, 38(2): 32-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 许春平, 黄家乐, 刘远上, 等. 贮存方式对烟叶常规化学成分及香味物质影响研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 33(1): 41-49. |
| XU C P, HUANG J L, LIU Y S, et al. Study on the effects of storage methods on conventional chemical compositions and aroma components of tobacco leaves[J]. Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 33(1): 41-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 崔钰杰, 蔡联合, 陈义昌, 等. 不同醇化时间片烟原料化学成分特点与差异分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(6): 137-140. |
| CUI Y J, CAI L H, CHEN Y C, et al. Chemical composition characteristics and differences of tobacco strip raw materials in different aging times[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024(6): 137-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 刘晓敏, 黄晓杰, 蔡昊城, 等. 醇化烟叶关键微生物类群与风格特色的相关性[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 50(1): 23-30. |
| LIU X M, HUANG X J, CAI H C, et al. Key microbial groups are closely related to the formation of aroma characteristics in aged tobacco leaves[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 2024, 50(1): 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 郝捷, 季嫱, 李力群, 等. 生物酶和微生物技术改善烟叶香气的研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2022, 12(6): 817-824. |
| HAO J, JI Q, LI L Q, et al. Research progress on improving aroma of tobacco leaf with bio-enzymes and microorganism technology[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2022, 12(6): 817-824. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 黄永光, 杨国华, 张肖克, 等. 产酱香风味芽孢杆菌类菌株发酵代谢产物及其酶分析研究[J]. 酿酒科技, 2013(1): 41-45. |
| HUANG Y G, YANG G H, ZHANG X K, et al. Study on the metabolites of Jiang-flavor-producing Bacillus[J]. Liquor-Making Science & Technology, 2013(1): 41-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 江丹霞, 武少兰, 杨国辉, 等. 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌Z21发酵条件优化及抑菌活性分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2022, 37(1): 103-113. |
| JIANG D X, WU S L, YANG G H, et al. Fermentation optimization and antifungal activity of Bacillus methylotrophicus Z21[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 37(1): 103-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 李润静, 张涛, 江波, 等. 甲基营养芽孢杆菌SK21.002产果聚糖蔗糖酶的发酵条件优化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(7): 157-161. |
| LI R J, ZHANG T, JIANG B, et al. Optimization of culture conditions for levansucrases by Bacillus methylotrophicus SK 21.002[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, 34(7): 157-161. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 战磊, 王寒, 关罗浩, 等. 用于烟叶提质的苏云金芽孢杆菌SY-1产淀粉酶条件的优化研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(9): 159-170. |
| ZHAN L, WANG H, GUAN L H, et al. Fermentation condition optimization of Bacillus thuringiensis SY-1 producing amylase used for improving tobacco quality[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(9): 159-170. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 吴旭东, 黄仕新, 吴鹏, 等. 一株烟用产纤维素酶菌株的筛选、鉴定及酶学特性研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2022, 37(3): 405-413. |
| WU X D, HUANG S X, WU P, et al. A high cellulase-producing bacterium from tobacco Lamina[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 37(3): 405-413. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 张怡帆, 胡苏林, 杜文杰, 等. 一株具有多糖降解酶活性的真菌菌株的筛选及其在烟叶品质提升中的应用研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2024, 30(4): 84-94. |
| ZHANG Y F, HU S L, DU W J, et al. Screening of a fungus with polysaccharide-degrading enzyme activity and studies of its application in improving the quality of tobacco leaves[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2024, 30(4): 84-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | CHEN C M, LI X M, YANG J K, et al. Isolation of nicotine-degrading bacterium Pseudomonas sp. Nic22, and its potential application in tobacco processing[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2008, 62(3): 226-231. |
| [29] | 马林, 武怡, 曾晓鹰, 等. 降解烟碱微生物的筛选及其酶在烟草中的应用[J]. 烟草科技, 2005, 38(9): 6-8, 19. |
| MA L, WU Y, ZENG X Y, et al. Screening of nicotine degrading microorganism and application of its enzyme in tobacco[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2005, 38(9): 6-8, 19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | ENGLISH C F, BELL E J, BERGER A J. Isolation of thermophiles from broadleaf tobacco and effect of pure culture inoculation on cigar aroma and mildness[J]. Applied Microbiology, 1967, 15(1): 117-119. |
| [31] | 邱立友, 赵铭钦, 岳雪梅, 等. 自然发酵烤烟叶面微生物区系的分离鉴定[J]. 烟草科技, 2000, 33(3): 14-17. |
| QIU L Y, ZHAO M Q, YUE X M, et al. Isolation and identification of the microflora on tobacco leaves during the natural fermentation of flue cured tobacco[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2000, 33(3): 14-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 李灿, 杨婷, 孙乙铭, 陈洪梁, 崔琦, 沈晓霞. 华东覆盆子优势种质资源的筛选与评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 349-364. |
| [2] | 孙健, 任江剑, 王海阁, 江建铭, 王志安, 俞旭平. 台湾独蒜兰组培繁育及其假鳞茎的化学组成分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 358-364. |
| [3] | 卢昕博, 袁颖, 王骏, 汪华文, 夏骏, 吴丹, 田金虎, 叶兴乾, 尹洁, 蒋健. 挤压处理对加热卷烟用烤烟烟叶化学组分和香气的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2803-2811. |
| [4] | 刘治会, 郝蓉蓉, 许永锋, 杨成德, 张俊莲. 马铃薯茄镰孢菌干腐病生防菌株的筛选、鉴定及其防效[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7): 1105-1111. |
| [5] | 卫强,王燕红. 棕榈花、叶、茎挥发油成分及抑菌活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 875-. |
| [6] | 刘智炫1,周清明2,黎娟2,*,陈佳亮1,陈焘2,王建波2,刘卉2. 湖南烟区不同年份烤烟化学成分的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(11): 1877-. |
| [7] | 蔡雪姣;陈建军;吕永华;邓世媛;陈泽鹏;陈永明;王 维;*. 不同土壤类型烟叶组织结构及化学成分的差异比较[J]. , 2013, 25(6): 0-1182. |
| [8] | 逄涛;林茜;邓建华;孔光辉;张晓海;*;卢秀萍. 云南省新烟区烟叶与津巴布韦烟叶主要化学成分比较分析[J]. , 2011, 23(2): 0-231. |
| [9] | 于建军;闫鼎;叶贤文;马云明;卫盼盼;刘茜. 重庆地区烤烟主要化学成分与评吸质量分析[J]. , 2010, 22(5): 669-672. |
| [10] | 于建军;郭玮;毕庆文;王海明;黎根;冯先情. 烤烟主要化学成分因子分析和综合评价[J]. , 2010, 22(2): 0-248. |
| [11] | 向金友;谢 冰;袁继超;张吉亚;陈建新;杨懿德. 宜宾烟区初烤烟品质构成特点研究[J]. , 2009, 21(6): 0-608. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||