浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1112-1125.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20260090
李文珍1,2,3(
), 梅涵一2,3, 王树林1, 聂晶2,3, 李春霖2,3, 张永志2,3, 邓丰涛4, 袁玉伟2,3,*(
)
收稿日期:2026-02-04
出版日期:2026-06-25
发布日期:2026-07-14
作者简介:李文珍,研究方向为食品加工与安全。E-mail: 3483295317@qq.com
通讯作者:
*袁玉伟,E-mail: yuanyw@zaas.ac.cn
基金资助:
LI Wenzhen1,2,3(
), MEI Hanyi2,3, WANG Shulin1, NIE Jing2,3, LI Chunlin2,3, ZHANG Yongzhi2,3, DENG Fengtao4, YUAN Yuwei2,3,*(
)
Received:2026-02-04
Published:2026-06-25
Online:2026-07-14
摘要:
本研究旨在建立一种基于近红外光谱(near infrared spectroscopy,NIR)技术的西藏牦牛酥油掺假快速、无损鉴别方法。以采集自西藏林芝和那曲的传统手工牦牛酥油为研究对象,按不同比例(0、20%、40%和60%)掺入棕榈油、牛油和人造奶油制备掺假样品,并测定其酸价、含水量、过氧化值、脂肪含量等理化指标;采用主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)对NIR光谱特征进行无监督降维与结构分析,并在PCA基础上构建有监督支持向量机(support vector machine,SVM)和k近邻(k-nearest neighbor, KNN)模型进行掺假鉴别。结果表明,不同掺假油脂对牦牛酥油理化指标的影响呈特异性规律:酸价偏低或含水量降低可能存在棕榈油掺假;酸价偏高或过氧化值上升可能存在高比例牛油掺假;含水量显著偏高是人造奶油掺假的关键依据;脂肪含量可与其他3个指标联合作为酥油掺假鉴别依据。PCA得分图显示,不同类别样品在主成分空间中存在一定分布差异,但类别间仍有重叠,难以形成清晰判别边界。SVM和KNN模型在独立测试集上的分类准确率均达到100%。综上,NIR原始光谱吸光度变化与掺假类型及其比例高度相关,结合化学计量学方法能够实现西藏牦牛酥油的有效掺假识别,为传统牦牛酥油品质保障提供了一种高效可靠的技术手段。
中图分类号:
李文珍, 梅涵一, 王树林, 聂晶, 李春霖, 张永志, 邓丰涛, 袁玉伟. 基于近红外光谱技术的西藏牦牛酥油掺假快速无损鉴别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(6): 1112-1125.
LI Wenzhen, MEI Hanyi, WANG Shulin, NIE Jing, LI Chunlin, ZHANG Yongzhi, DENG Fengtao, YUAN Yuwei. Rapid and non-destructive identification of adulteration in Xizang yak ghee based on near infrared spectroscopy[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1112-1125.
图1 掺假酥油的理化特征 那曲酥油在相同掺假物下不同掺假水平间无相同大写字母表示差异显著(p<0.05),林芝酥油在相同掺假物下不同掺假水平间无相同小写字母表示差异显著(p<0.05);数据为5次重复的平均值±标准误。
Fig.1 Physical and chemical characteristics of adulterated yak ghee Nagqu yak ghee with the same adulterant marked without the same uppercase letter between different adulteration levels indicates significant (p<0.05) differences, and Nyingchi yak ghee with the same adulterant marked without the same lowercase letter between different adulteration levels indicates significant (p<0.05) differences. Data are presented as mean±standard error of five replicates.
| 主成分 Principal component | 方差贡献率 Variance contribution rate | 累计方差贡献率 Cumulative variance contribution rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89.4 | 89.4 |
| 2 | 8.3 | 97.7 |
| 3 | 1.9 | 99.6 |
| 4 | 0.3 | 99.9 |
| 5 | 0.1 | 99.9 |
表1 前5个主成分的方差贡献率与累计方差贡献率
Table 1 Variance contribution rates and cumulative variance contribution rate of the top 5 principal components
| 主成分 Principal component | 方差贡献率 Variance contribution rate | 累计方差贡献率 Cumulative variance contribution rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89.4 | 89.4 |
| 2 | 8.3 | 97.7 |
| 3 | 1.9 | 99.6 |
| 4 | 0.3 | 99.9 |
| 5 | 0.1 | 99.9 |
| 模型 Model | 关键参数 Key parameter | 数据类型 Data type | 输入 变量 Input variable | 累计方差贡 献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate/% | 训练集 Training set | 预测集 Prediction set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均F1分数 Average F1 score | AUC | Kappa值 Kappa value | 平均F1分数 Average F1 score | AUC | Kappa值 Kappa value | |||||
| SVM | C=87.3 | 原始光谱Raw spectrum | 800 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KNN | k=5 | 原始光谱Raw spectrum | 800 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PCA-SVM | C=156.8 | 主成分得分 Principal component scores | 3 | ≥99 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PCA-KNN | k=5 | 主成分得分 Principal component scores | 3 | ≥99 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
表2 基于原始光谱和PCA降维后光谱的掺假西藏牦牛酥油判别准确率
Table 2 Discriminant accuracy of adulterated Xizang yak ghee based on the original spectra and PCA dimensionality-reduced spectra
| 模型 Model | 关键参数 Key parameter | 数据类型 Data type | 输入 变量 Input variable | 累计方差贡 献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate/% | 训练集 Training set | 预测集 Prediction set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均F1分数 Average F1 score | AUC | Kappa值 Kappa value | 平均F1分数 Average F1 score | AUC | Kappa值 Kappa value | |||||
| SVM | C=87.3 | 原始光谱Raw spectrum | 800 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KNN | k=5 | 原始光谱Raw spectrum | 800 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PCA-SVM | C=156.8 | 主成分得分 Principal component scores | 3 | ≥99 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PCA-KNN | k=5 | 主成分得分 Principal component scores | 3 | ≥99 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
图4 西藏牦牛酥油掺假鉴别模型 a,SVM预测集;b,SVM训练集;c,KNN预测集;d,KNN训练集。绿色方块代表模型识别正确样本;橙色方块代表模型识别错误样本;矩阵最右侧一列为各行真实类别样本的分类召回率;矩阵最底部一行为各列预测类别样本的分类精确率;右下角灰色单元格为模型整体分类准确率。所有样本均实现100%正确分类。
Fig.4 Adulteration identification model of Xizang yak ghee a, SVM prediction set; b, SVM training set; c, KNN prediction set; d, KNN training set. Green squares represent correctly classified samples by the model. Orange squares represent misclassified samples. The rightmost column of the matrix indicates the recall rate for each row’s true class samples. The bottom row shows the precision rate for each column’s predicted class samples, and the gray square in the bottom-right corner displays the model’s overall classification accuracy. All samples achieved 100% correct classification.
图5 PCA降维后的西藏牦牛酥油掺假鉴别模型 a,PCA-SVM预测集;b,PCA-SVM训练集;c,PCA-KNN预测集;d,PCA-KNN训练集。绿色方块代表模型识别正确样本;橙色方块代表模型识别错误样本;矩阵最右侧一列为各行真实类别样本的分类召回率;矩阵最底部一行为各列预测类别样本的分类精确率;右下角灰色单元格为模型整体分类准确率。所有样本均实现100%正确分类。
Fig.5 Adulteration identification model of Xizang yak ghee after PCA dimensionality reduction a, PCA-SVM prediction set; b, PCA-SVM training set; c, PCA-KNN prediction set; d, PCA-KNN training set. Green squares represent correctly classified samples by the model; orange squares represent misclassified samples. The rightmost column of the matrix indicates the recall rate for each row’s true class samples, the bottom row shows the precision rate for each column’s predicted class samples, and the gray square in the bottom-right corner displays the model’s overall classification accuracy. All samples achieved 100% correct classification.
| [1] | 杨婷婷, 孙万成, 罗毅皓, 等. 菜籽油、牦牛酥油和亚麻籽油调和油的制备及其稳定性研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2026, 61(1): 274-279. |
| YANG T T, SUN W C, LUO Y H, et al. Development and stability evaluation of a blended oil from rapeseed oil, yak chee and linseed oil[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2026, 61(1): 274-279. | |
| [2] | 谭大明, 吴雪莲, 邱城, 等. 西藏自治区酥油、糌粑、青稞酒、风干牛肉质量安全调研[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(2): 368-369. |
| TAN D M, WU X L, QIU C, et al. Investigation on the quality safety of Tibetan butter, tsampa, Qingke liquor and wind-dried yak meat in Tibet Autonomous Region of China[J]. Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 2011(2): 368-369. | |
| [3] | 洪蕾, 杨丽杰, 张洋, 等. 精酥油的制作与脂肪酸组成分析[J]. 食品工业, 2013, 34(3): 190-192. |
| HONG L, YANG L J, ZHANG Y, et al. The processing technology and fatty acid composition analysis of pure butter[J]. The Food Industry, 2013, 34(3): 190-192. | |
| [4] | 王浩文, 张峰轶, 王传明, 等. 不同市售牛油理化性质与风味品质的比较[J]. 中国油脂, 2025, 50(2): 46-50. |
| WANG H W, ZHANG F Y, WANG C M, et al. Comparison of physicochemical properties and flavor quality of different commercially available beef tallow[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2025, 50(2): 46-50. | |
| [5] | 张阜青. 棕榈油基人造奶油品质缺陷及改善[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2009. |
| ZHANG F Q. The study on quality defects and improvement of palm oil-based margarine[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2009. | |
| [6] | 孙美青, 马莺, 程金菊. 牦牛酥油理化性质研究[J]. 中国乳品工业, 2016, 44(3): 9-11. |
| SUN M Q, MA Y, CHENG J J. Physical and chemical properties of yak butter[J]. China Dairy Industry, 2016, 44(3): 9-11. | |
| [7] | 于海坤. 牛油与植物油复配脂肪酸平衡调和油的研究及品质分析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2022. |
| YU H K. Study and quality analysis of fatty acid balanced blended oil from beef tallow and vegetable oil[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2022. | |
| [8] | 李响, 王晓霞, 刘辰, 等. 近红外光谱在乳制品检测中应用技术研究进展[J]. 中国检验检测, 2025, 33(1): 24-27. |
| LI X, WANG X X, LIU C, et al. Research progress on the application technology of near-infrared spectroscopy in dairy product detection[J]. China Inspection Body & Laboratory, 2025, 33(1): 24-27. | |
| [9] | 方芳, 王耀耀, 刘欣, 等. 基于近红外光谱技术的茶籽油掺伪定性鉴别和定量分析[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2023, 38(12): 203-210. |
| FANG F, WANG Y Y, LIU X, et al. Qualitative identification and quantitative analysis of adulterated in Camellia seed oil based on near infrared spectroscopy technology[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2023, 38(12): 203-210. | |
| [10] | 黄宝莹, 佘之蕴, 王文敏, 等. 近红外光谱技术在乳制品快速检测中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国酿造, 2020, 39(7): 16-19. |
| HUANG B Y, SHE Z Y, WANG W M, et al. Research progress of near-infrared spectroscopy application in rapid detection of dairy products[J]. China Brewing, 2020, 39(7): 16-19. | |
| [11] | 洛曲, 于修烛, 张建新, 等. 基于近红外光谱的藏区酥油脂肪和蛋白质含量快速检测分析[J]. 中国油脂, 2018, 43(3): 136-140. |
| LUO Q, YU X Z, ZHANG J X, et al. Rapid determination of fat and protein contents in ghee using near-infrared spectroscopy[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2018, 43(3): 136-140. | |
| [12] | 赵小伟, 郑楠, 王加启, 等. 近红外光谱技术在乳及乳制品质量检测中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2024, 36(9): 5451-5459. |
| ZHAO X W, ZHENG N, WANG J Q, et al. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy technology in milk and dairy products[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2024, 36(9): 5451-5459. | |
| [13] | 万恒兴, 余展旺, 冯丽雄. 二维相关近红外光谱的牦牛奶粉掺伪判别分析[J]. 山东化工, 2024, 53(20): 149-152. |
| WAN H X, YU Z W, FENG L X. PLS-discriminant analysis of adulterated yak milk powder based on two-dimensional correlation near-infrared spectroscopy[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2024, 53(20): 149-152. | |
| [14] | 那琴. 基于近红外光谱技术结合化学计量学的驼乳及乳粉掺假检测研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022. |
| NA Q. Research on adulteration detection of camel milk and milk powder based on near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2022. | |
| [15] | 彭海洋, 巫忠东, 林涛, 等. 基于近红外光谱技术的牦牛奶粉掺假检测与产地识别研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2024, 45(22): 9-17. |
| PENG H Y, WU Z D, LIN T, et al. Adulteration detection and origin identification of yak milk powder based on near-infrared spectroscopy technology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(22): 9-17. | |
| [16] | YU D X, GUO S, ZHANG X, et al. Combining stable isotope, multielement and untargeted metabolomics with chemometrics to discriminate the geographical origins of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe)[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 426: 136577. |
| [17] | ROUDAK M A, FARAHANI M, HOSSEINBEIGI F B. Extension of K-nearest neighbors and introduction of an applicable prediction criterion for a novel Monte Carlo simulation-based method in structural reliability[J]. Structures, 2024, 66: 106867. |
| [18] | LIU D, SUN D W, ZENG X A. Recent advances in wavelength selection techniques for hyperspectral image processing in the food industry[J]. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2014, 7(2): 307-323. |
| [19] | 周显青, 康招阳, 韩佳静, 等. 基于PCA-RF预测方便米饭品质模型的建立[J]. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 46(2): 87-95. |
| ZHOU X Q, KANG Z Y, HAN J J, et al. Establishment of a PCA-RF-based prediction model for the quality of instant rice[J]. Journal of Henan University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 46(2): 87-95. | |
| [20] | 王国胜. 核函数的性质及其构造方法[J]. 计算机科学, 2006, 33(6): 172-174. |
| WANG G S. Properties and construction methods of kernel in support vector machine[J]. Computer Science, 2006, 33(6): 172-174. | |
| [21] | 孙淑敏, 谢岩黎, 张严. 基于可见—近红外光谱的花生油二元掺伪体系鉴别研究[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2015, 23(6): 84-88. |
| SUN S M, XIE Y L, ZHANG Y. Identification of adulterate peanut oil binary system based on visible-near infrared spectroscopy[J]. Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods, 2015, 23(6): 84-88. | |
| [22] | 罗香, 刘波平, 冯利辉, 等. 近红外光谱技术用于花生油中棕榈油含量的测定[J]. 分析科学学报, 2010, 26(6): 673-676. |
| LUO X, LIU B P, FENG L H, et al. Determination of palm oil content in peanut oil samples by near infrared spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Analytical Science, 2010, 26(6): 673-676. | |
| [23] | 李梅, 智丽慧. 近红外光谱技术快速检测奶酪及其制品的核心质量指标[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2025, 16(15): 51-56. |
| LI M, ZHI L H. Rapid detection of core quality indicators in cheese and cheese products by near-infrared spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2025, 16(15): 51-56. | |
| [24] | 庄小丽, 相玉红, 强洪, 等. 近红外光谱和化学计量学方法用于橄榄油品质分析与掺杂量检测[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2010, 30(4): 933-936. |
| ZHUANG X L, XIANG Y H, QIANG H, et al. Quality analysis of olive oil and quantification detection of adulteration in olive oil by near-infrared spectrometry and chemometrics[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2010, 30(4): 933-936. | |
| [25] | BAI L, ZHANG Z X, LI Y L, et al. Combining stable isotopes and multi-elements with machine learning chemometric models to identify the geographical origins of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg[J]. Food Chemistry, 2025, 469: 142496. |
| [26] | 刘红丽, 刘文捷, 毕艳兰, 等. 棕榈油在常温储存过程中品质变化的研究[J]. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 32(2): 35-39. |
| LIU H L, LIU W J, BI Y L, et al. Study on the quality change of palm oil during normal storage[J]. Journal of Henan University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 32(2): 35-39. | |
| [27] | 李东锐, 毕艳兰, 肖新生, 等. 食用油煎炸过程中的品质变化研究[J]. 中国油脂, 2006, 31(6): 34-36. |
| LI D R, BI Y L, XIAO X S, et al. Research on the change of edible oil quality during frying process[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2006, 31(6): 34-36. | |
| [28] | 刘佳敏, 何新益, 刘晓东, 等. 精炼对牛油主要理化指标及挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2020, 36(4): 62-67. |
| LIU J M, HE X Y, LIU X D, et al. Effect of refining on main physical and chemical indexes and volatile components of beef tallow[J]. Food and Machinery, 2020, 36(4): 62-67. | |
| [29] | 左青, 费楚琼, 胡建新, 等. 特种油脂在我国食品工业中的应用[J]. 中国油脂, 2025, 50(9): 153-155. |
| ZUO Q, FEI C Q, HU J X, et al. Application of special oils in China’s food industry[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2025, 50(9): 153-155. | |
| [30] | 谢司伟, 刘春爱, 孙术国, 等. 西藏不同海拔牦牛酥油的营养、风味及功能特性比较[J]. 食品与机械, 2021, 37(2): 19-23. |
| XIE S W, LIU C A, SUN S G, et al. Comparison of nutritional, flavor and functional characteristics of Tibetan yak butter at different altitudes[J]. Food & Machinery, 2021, 37(2): 19-23. | |
| [31] | 秦士博, 徐学兵, 张虹, 等. 人造奶油氧化稳定性的研究进展[J]. 中国油脂, 2020, 45(5): 58-62. |
| QIN S B, XU X B, ZHANG H, et al. Advance in oxidative stability of margarine[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2020, 45(5): 58-62. | |
| [32] | 张琦. 酥油贮藏稳定性研究[D]. 天津: 天津商业大学, 2014. |
| ZHANG Q. Research on storage stability of ghee[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Commerce, 2014. | |
| [33] | 高浩, 高媛惠, 薛颖. 近红外光谱法在食品营养成分检测中的应用研究[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2025(3): 156-158. |
| GAO H, GAO Y H, XUE Y. Research on the application of near-infrared spectroscopy in the detection of food nutrients[J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2025(3): 156-158. | |
| [34] | 周禹, 张睿加, 袁伟东, 等. 近红外光谱及成像检测影响因素与校正方法研究进展[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2024, 61(4): 29-38. |
| ZHOU Y, ZHANG R J, YUAN W D, et al. Research progress on influencing factors and correction methods of near infrared spectroscopy and imaging[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(4): 29-38. | |
| [35] | 邓焯文. 基于近红外光谱和计算机视觉技术结合深度学习算法的山茶油真实性鉴别研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2024. |
| DENG Z W. Authenticity identification of camellia oil based on near-infrared spectroscopy and computer vision techniques combined with deep learning[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2024. |
| [1] | 孙达, 毛斌瑀, 黄旦益, 崔宏春, 夏兵, 郑旭霞. 基于土壤特性因素的不同区域西湖龙井茶品质研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(6): 1087-1098. |
| [2] | 李坤峰, 李诚, 高华奇, 何威羚, 黄凌霞. 十字型平面棚架栽培省力化管理对果桑品种大10生长、桑椹产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(6): 1209-1217. |
| [3] | 葛方赢, 岳文浩, 蔡康锋, 宋秀娟, 汪军妹, 刘磊. 啤酒大麦主要麦芽品质性状研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(5): 1024-1034. |
| [4] | 张昊, 谭烽, 周禹, 王大臣, 周宏平, 姜洪喆. 高光谱成像技术在农作物品质与安全原位感知中的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(5): 1035-1047. |
| [5] | 李洋, 刘战群, 贺润平, 赵飞, 邢鲲, 杨存弟, 蒲秀兰. 微生物菌肥对土壤养分、甜瓜品质与病虫害防治效果的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(5): 909-918. |
| [6] | 李佳奇, 胡宽莲, 沈子靖, 史建国, 何韵. 不同霜冻胁迫时间下霜桑叶品质的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(5): 934-943. |
| [7] | 覃响, 邓翔鸿, 黄展锐, 袁驰, 陈浩, 胡连花, 何婉莹, 赵良忠. 鹌鹑蛋脉冲真空卤制工艺优化及其品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(5): 998-1007. |
| [8] | 石尹, 汪艳霞, 王娟英, 黄小贞. 贵州野生古茶树单株TZRR1与福鼎大白茶的持嫩性和品质比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(4): 621-631. |
| [9] | 王华杰, 崔宏春, 赵芸, 黄海涛, 祝凌平. 抹茶品质与安全评价体系研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(4): 809-823. |
| [10] | 杜辰飞, 李文珏, 魏春艳, 蔡丹英, 王月志, 施泽彬, 戴美松, 高永彬. 果树遗传图谱构建与果实主要品质性状QTL定位研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(3): 609-620. |
| [11] | 张悦, 王镜然, 周强, 陈美玲, 王颜红. 外源喷施叶酸对稻米叶酸含量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(2): 197-205. |
| [12] | 刘静, 王尖, 黄钰, 吴晓花, 郭轩赫, 汪颖, 李国景, 许小江. 南瓜果实品质评价的指标筛选与模型构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(2): 248-257. |
| [13] | 许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [14] | 朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932. |
| [15] | 贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||