榨菜缩短茎的切割力学特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.18

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1939-1945.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.18

榨菜缩短茎的切割力学特性

郑航(), 薛向磊, 俞国红^*()

浙江省农业科学院农业装备研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2021-04-19 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-11-02
作者简介:*俞国红,E-mail: Yuguohong@163.com
郑航(1993—),男,浙江龙游人,硕士,研究实习员,主要从事智能农机装备理论与设计研究。E-mail: Zhrory@126.com
通讯作者: 俞国红
基金资助:
浙江省科技计划(2020C26001)

Mechanical property of cutting shorten stems of mustard tuber

ZHENG Hang(), XUE Xianglei, YU Guohong^*()

Institute of Agricultural Equipment, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2021-04-19 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-02
Contact: YU Guohong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了获得榨菜缩短茎的最佳切割要素组合,在TMS-Pro质构仪上开展榨菜缩短茎切割的单因素试验和正交试验,以最大切割力和平均切割力为试验指标,探究刀刃类型、滑切角度、切割速度、切割方式对榨菜缩短茎切割过程中切割力的影响。结果表明:滑切角度对最大切割力和平均切割力影响显著(P<0.05),刀刃类型对平均切割力影响显著(P<0.05),锯齿刃比光刃省力。为有效降低最大切割力和平均切割力,榨菜缩短茎切割的参数宜确定为锯齿刃,滑切角度20°,切割速度80 mm·min^-1。此时,最大切割力为86.2 N,平均切割力为53.1 N。研究结果可为榨菜收获机的切割装置设计提供理论依据。

关键词: 榨菜, 力学特性, 缩短茎, 切割

Abstract:

In order to obtain best parameters for the cutting of shorten stems of mustard tuber, the single-factor experiments and orthogonal tests were carried out on the TMS-Pro texture analyzer. The maximum cutting force and the average cutting force were selected as test indexes, and the effects of cutter type, sliding angle, cutting speed and cutting direction on the cutting force during the cutting process of shorten stems of mustard tuber were analyzed.It was shown that the sliding angle had significant (P<0.05) effect on the maximum cutting force and the average cutting force. The cutter type had significant (P<0.05) influence on the average cutting force, and the sawtooth cutter was more labor-saving than the light cutter. The most labor-saving combination for cutting of shorten stems of mustard tuber was as follows: sawtooth cutter, sliding angle of 20°, and cutting speed of 80 mm·min^-1. Under this circumstance, the maximum cutting force was 86.2 N,and the average cutting force was 53.1 N. These findings could provide references for the design of the cutting device for shorten stems of mustard tuber.

Key words: mustard tuber, mechanical property, shorten stems, cutting

中图分类号:

S225.92

郑航, 薛向磊, 俞国红. 榨菜缩短茎的切割力学特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1939-1945.

ZHENG Hang, XUE Xianglei, YU Guohong. Mechanical property of cutting shorten stems of mustard tuber[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1939-1945.

图/表 12

图1 试验仪器

Fig.1 Equipment for cutting test

图2 榨菜切割刀片图中从左到右刀片的滑切角度依次为0、10°、20°。

Fig.2 Cutters used in this experiment The sliding angle of cutters from left to right in the figure is 0, 10°, 20°, accordingly.

图3 榨菜示意图 H,茎瘤的纵向高度;L,茎瘤的横向直径;l,缩短茎长度;D,缩短茎直径。

Fig.3 Sketch of mustard tuber H, Height of stem tumor; L2, Width of stem tumor;l, Length of shorten stems; D, Width of shorten stems.

图4 切割方式示意图

Fig.4 Diagram of cutting methods

图5 滑切试验示意图

Fig.5 Diagram of sliding cut test

图6 榨菜切割试验专用夹具 1,刀片安装架;2,切割刀片;3,榨菜缩短茎;4,U形座,1;5,U形座2;6,机架。

Fig.6 Special fixture for cutting test 1, Blade mount; 2, Cutting blade; 3, Shorten stems of mustard tuber; 4, U-shaped seat 1; 5, U-shaped seat 2; 6, Frame.

表1 正交试验的因素与水平

Table 1 Factors and levels of orthogonal test

水平 Level	试验因素Experiment factor
水平 Level	A	B/(°)	C/(mm·min^-1)
1	光刃Light cutter	0	30
2	锯齿刃 Sawtooth cutter	10	80
3	—	20	120

图7 不同刀刃类型的切割力-位移曲线

Fig.7 Cutting force-displacement curves under different cutters

图8 不同滑切角度的切割力-位移曲线

Fig.8 Cutting force-displacement curves under different sliding angles

图9 不同切割速度的切割力-位移曲线

Fig.9 Cutting force-displacement curves under different cutting speeds

图10 不同切割方式的切割力-位移曲线

Fig.10 Cutting force-displacement curves under different cutting directions

表2 正交试验设计与结果

Table 2 Orthogonal test design and result

试验序号 Test number	试验因素Experiment factor			最大切割力 Maximum cutting force/N	平均切割力 Average cutting force/N
试验序号 Test number	A	B	C	最大切割力 Maximum cutting force/N	平均切割力 Average cutting force/N
1	1	1	1	131.6	84.2
2	1	2	2	107.9	72.4
3	1	3	3	100.8	60.5
4	1	1	2	125.6	82.3
5	1	2	3	113.6	71.6
6	1	3	1	105.1	64.3
7	2	1	3	119.7	69.2
8	2	2	1	94.3	60.5
9	2	3	2	86.8	53.5

参考文献 22

[1]	中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所. 中国蔬菜品种志[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2002.
[2]	艾海涛. 重庆市涪陵榨菜产业可持续发展研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2016.
	AI H T. Sustainable development research of the Chongqing Fuling pickled mustard tuber[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	况觅, 董鹏, 李姗蓉. 重庆市青菜头产销现状与分析[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2015, 31(3):51-54.
	KUANG M, DONG P, LI S R. Analysis on the production and sales of tumorous stem mustard in Chongqing[J]. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2015, 31(3):51-54.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	李小强, 王芬娥, 郭维俊, 等. 甘蓝根茎切割力影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(10):42-48.
	LI X Q, WANG F E, GUO W J, et al. Influencing factor analysis of cabbage root cutting force based on orthogonal test[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(10):42-48.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	陈健, 王新忠, 吴又新, 等. 温室生菜根茎的剪切力学特性研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2020, 42(11):173-178.
	CHEN J, WANG X Z, WU Y X, et al. Study on shear mechanical properties of greenhouse lettuce roots[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2020, 42(11):173-178.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	施印炎, 汪小旵, 章永年, 等. 芦蒿有序收获机往复切割力影响因素试验与分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2018, 39(12):46-53.
	SHI Y Y, WANG X C, ZHANG Y N, et al. Test and analysis on the influence factors of reciprocating cutting force of Artemisia selengensis harvester[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2018, 39(12):46-53.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	袁洁. 往复式甘蔗收割机设计及仿真分析[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2017.
	YUAN J. The design and simulation analysis on reciprocating sugarcane harvester[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	LEBLICQ T, VANMAERCKE S, RAMON H, et al. Mechanical analysis of the bending behaviour of plant stems[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 129:87-99. DOI URL
[9]	MENG Y M, WEI J D, WEI J, et al. An ANSYS/LS-DYNA simulation and experimental study of circular saw blade cutting system of mulberry cutting machine[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 157:38-48. DOI URL
[10]	杜冬冬, 王俊, 裘姗姗. 甘蓝根茎部切割部位及方式优化试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(12):34-40.
	DU D D, WANG J, QIU S S. Optimization of cutting position and mode for cabbage harvesting[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(12):34-40. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	陈健. 温室叶菜的收获力学特性试验研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019.
	CHEN J. Experimental study on harvesting mechanical properties of greenhouse leafy vegetables[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	康峰, 仝思源, 张汉石, 等. 苹果枝条往复式切割剪枝参数分析与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(16):9-16.
	KANG F, TONG S Y, ZHANG H S, et al. Analysis and experiments of reciprocating cutting parameters for apple tree branches[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(16):9-16.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	DORAN C F, MCCORMACK B A O, MACEY A. A simplified model to determine the contribution of strain energy in the failure process of thin biological membranes during cutting[J]. Strain, 2004, 40(4):173-179. DOI URL
[14]	宋占华, 宋华鲁, 耿爱军, 等. 棉花秸秆双支撑切割性能试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(16):37-45.
	SONG Z H, SONG H L, GENG A J, et al. Experiment on cutting characteristics of cotton stalk with double supports[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(16):37-45.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	耿端阳, 张道林, 王相友. 新编农业机械学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011.
[16]	庞声海. 关于滑切理论与滑切角的选用[J]. 华中农学院学报, 1982(2):64-69.
	PANG S H. On the theory of sliding cutting and choice of its angle[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural College, 1982(2):64-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	陈诚, 俞国胜. 往复式灌木切割器滑切角对灌木切割的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(2):115-119.
	CHEN C, YU G S. Effect of sliding cutting angle of bush reciprocating cutter on bush cutting[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(2):115-119.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	MATHANKER S K, GRIFT T E, HANSEN A C. Effect of blade oblique angle and cutting speed on cutting energy for energycane stems[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 133:64-70. DOI URL
[19]	何晓东, 朱德泉, 朱健军, 等. 双速毛刷辊式水果清洗机设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9):1702-1710.
	HE X D, ZHU D Q, ZHU J J, et al. Design and experiment on washer with two-speed hair brush rollers for fruits[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(9):1702-1710.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	陈魁. 试验设计与分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2005.
[21]	俞国红, 郑航, 薛向磊. 自适应仿形甘薯削皮机优化设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(3):135-142.
	YU G H, ZHENG H, XUE X L. Optimization design and experiment of auto-adaptive profiling sweet potato peeler[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(3):135-142.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	张燕青, 崔清亮, 郭玉明, 等. 谷子茎秆切割力学特性试验与分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(4):146-155.
	ZHANG Y Q, CUI Q L, GUO Y M, et al. Experiment and analysis of cutting mechanical properties of millet stem[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(4):146-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)

榨菜缩短茎的切割力学特性

Mechanical property of cutting shorten stems of mustard tuber

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 22

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	傅童, 郑航, 薛向磊, 叶云翔, 俞国红, 葛青. 茶树嫩梢形态与力学特性试验研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1425-1435.
[2]	赵邯, 项可心, 刘春菊, 李斌, 李大婧, 李越, 牛丽影, 于蕊. 不同品种桃果实化学组分、微观结构与质地的关系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2705-2718.
[3]	林圣博, 王邦追, 吴美玲, 李亚健, 王国强, 唐忠. 香葱葱白机械载荷损伤力学特性表征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2627-2634.
[4]	刘丽敏, 任萍, 陈建能, 张雪恒. 基于作物力学特性的甘蔗收割机参数优化与田间试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1187-1194.
[5]	窦文卿, 柴春祥, 刘玥, 鲁晓翔. 质构技术快速辨别蜂蜜品种的研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1073-1080.
[6]	闫建伟, 苏小东, 赵源, 刘进平. 基于图像特征的小麦胚芽鞘识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2): 326-332.
[7]	杨静, 祝彪, 何勇, 应泉盛, 张蕾琛. 西瓜果实力学特性与品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(9): 1581-1588.
[8]	魏丽娟，韩正晟，戴飞*，李兴凯，高爱民，张克平. 育种小麦籽粒力学特性的有限元分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 378-.
[9]	邓接楼, 欧阳佰玲, 张高阳, 周木华, 桂在智, 朱元元, 王鹏飞. 不同栽培条件对杂交晚稻茎秆抗倒伏性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(12): 1970-1978.
[10]	徐澍敏;何龙;马顺水;厉继仁;王俊. 桃的撞击特性及与损伤的关系[J]. , 2006, 18(2): 0-109.
[11]	陈石头;余小林;曹家树;吴剑丙. 榨菜子叶和带柄子叶再生植株的研究[J]. , 2005, 17(1): 0-30.