浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 141-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.17
收稿日期:
2021-03-03
出版日期:
2022-01-25
发布日期:
2022-02-05
通讯作者:
傅佩红
作者简介:
* 傅佩红,E-mail: fph@mail.hzau.edu.cn基金资助:
Received:
2021-03-03
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-02-05
Contact:
FU Peihong
摘要:
将模糊数学理论引入柑橘种植的土地适宜性评价中,以湖北省通山县为例,在当地的农用地中采集207个土壤样本点,将气候、土壤和地形数据转换为模糊隶属度数据,然后在ArcGIS软件环境中结合层次分析法和模糊数学方法,建立包含15项指标的柑橘种植土地适宜性评估模型。结果表明,该区域有26.94%(652.37 km2)、32.85%(795.51 km2)、23.14%(560.42 km2)和17.07%(413.40 km2)的土地分别非常适合、适中、勉强适合和不适合柑橘生产。研究结果与当地生产实际相吻合,说明建立的研究方法可行,可为提高土地利用效率,以及更好地指导柑橘生产提供参考。
中图分类号:
习文勇, 傅佩红. 基于模糊数学的柑橘种植土地适宜性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 141-152.
XI Wenyong, FU Peihong. Land suitability evaluation of citrus cultivation based on fuzzy mathematics[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 141-152.
样本属性 Sample attribute | 有效样本数 Effective samples number | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 平均值 Average | 中位数 Median | 标准差 Standard deviation | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 201 | 9.75 | 43.2 | 22.04 | 21.2 | 6.74 | 0.79 | 3.50 |
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 192 | 4.8 | 112.8 | 21.66 | 14.5 | 18.57 | 2.12 | 8.22 |
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg-1) | 191 | 55 | 253 | 116.57 | 105.5 | 45.08 | 1.09 | 3.77 |
pH | 200 | 4.37 | 7.68 | 6.27 | 6.17 | 0.64 | 0.18 | 2.47 |
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm-3) | 202 | 0.85 | 1.11 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.04 | -0.12 | 2.81 |
表1 采样点统计学特征值
Table 1 Statistical characteristic values of sampling points
样本属性 Sample attribute | 有效样本数 Effective samples number | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 平均值 Average | 中位数 Median | 标准差 Standard deviation | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 201 | 9.75 | 43.2 | 22.04 | 21.2 | 6.74 | 0.79 | 3.50 |
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 192 | 4.8 | 112.8 | 21.66 | 14.5 | 18.57 | 2.12 | 8.22 |
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg-1) | 191 | 55 | 253 | 116.57 | 105.5 | 45.08 | 1.09 | 3.77 |
pH | 200 | 4.37 | 7.68 | 6.27 | 6.17 | 0.64 | 0.18 | 2.47 |
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm-3) | 202 | 0.85 | 1.11 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.04 | -0.12 | 2.81 |
目标层Target layer | 准则层Criterion layer | 指标层Index layer | 权重Weight |
---|---|---|---|
土地适宜性Land suitability | 气候Climate(0.214 3) | 年平均温度Annual average temperature(0.333 3) | 0.071 4 |
年最低温度Annual minimum temperature(0.333 3) | 0.071 4 | ||
年降水量Annual precipitation(0.166 7) | 0.035 7 | ||
相对湿度Relative humidity(0.166 7) | 0.035 7 | ||
土壤理化性质 | 有机质Organic matter(0.447 7) | 0.159 9 | |
Soil physical and chemical properties | 有效磷Available P(0.191 0) | 0.068 2 | |
(0.357 1) | 速效钾Available K(0.191 0) | 0.068 2 | |
pH(0.115 1) | 0.041 1 | ||
土壤容重Soil bulk density(0.055 2) | 0.019 7 | ||
地形Terrain(0.142 9) | 海拔Elevation(0.573 6) | 0.081 9 | |
坡度Slope(0.139 9) | 0.020 0 | ||
坡向Aspect(0.286 4) | 0.040 9 | ||
土质条件Soil condition(0.285 7) | 质地构型Texture configuration(0.128 5) | 0.036 7 | |
土壤类型Soil type(0.594 9) | 0.170 0 | ||
土壤质地Soil texture(0.276 6) | 0.079 0 |
表2 通山县柑橘种植土地适宜性评价指标及其权重
Table 2 Evaluation indexes and weights of land suitability for citrus planting in Tongshan County
目标层Target layer | 准则层Criterion layer | 指标层Index layer | 权重Weight |
---|---|---|---|
土地适宜性Land suitability | 气候Climate(0.214 3) | 年平均温度Annual average temperature(0.333 3) | 0.071 4 |
年最低温度Annual minimum temperature(0.333 3) | 0.071 4 | ||
年降水量Annual precipitation(0.166 7) | 0.035 7 | ||
相对湿度Relative humidity(0.166 7) | 0.035 7 | ||
土壤理化性质 | 有机质Organic matter(0.447 7) | 0.159 9 | |
Soil physical and chemical properties | 有效磷Available P(0.191 0) | 0.068 2 | |
(0.357 1) | 速效钾Available K(0.191 0) | 0.068 2 | |
pH(0.115 1) | 0.041 1 | ||
土壤容重Soil bulk density(0.055 2) | 0.019 7 | ||
地形Terrain(0.142 9) | 海拔Elevation(0.573 6) | 0.081 9 | |
坡度Slope(0.139 9) | 0.020 0 | ||
坡向Aspect(0.286 4) | 0.040 9 | ||
土质条件Soil condition(0.285 7) | 质地构型Texture configuration(0.128 5) | 0.036 7 | |
土壤类型Soil type(0.594 9) | 0.170 0 | ||
土壤质地Soil texture(0.276 6) | 0.079 0 |
指标 Index | 隶属函数类型 Membership function type | 下限 Lower limit | 最佳下限 Optimal lower limit | 最佳上限 Optimal upper limit | 上限 Upper limit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年平均温度Annual average temperature/℃ | S型Sigmoid | 13 | — | — | 17 |
年最低温度Annual minimum temperature/℃ | S型Sigmoid | -10 | — | — | -4 |
年降水量Annual precipitation/mm | S型Sigmoid | 1 600 | — | — | 2 000 |
相对湿度Relative humidity/% | 倒S型Inverted sigmoid | 75 | — | — | 80 |
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg-1) | S型Sigmoid | 10 | — | — | 30 |
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg-1) | S型Sigmoid | 50 | — | — | 180 |
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 抛物线型Parabolic | 15 | 25 | 35 | 45 |
pH值 pH value | 抛物线型Parabolic | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 |
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm-3) | 抛物线型Parabolic | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
海拔Elevation/m | 抛物线型Parabolic | 60 | 150 | 800 | 1 600 |
坡度Slope/(°) | 倒S型Inverted sigmoid | 6 | — | — | 25 |
表3 部分指标的隶属函数类型及其转折点取值
Table 3 Membership function type of indexes and corresponding values of turning points
指标 Index | 隶属函数类型 Membership function type | 下限 Lower limit | 最佳下限 Optimal lower limit | 最佳上限 Optimal upper limit | 上限 Upper limit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年平均温度Annual average temperature/℃ | S型Sigmoid | 13 | — | — | 17 |
年最低温度Annual minimum temperature/℃ | S型Sigmoid | -10 | — | — | -4 |
年降水量Annual precipitation/mm | S型Sigmoid | 1 600 | — | — | 2 000 |
相对湿度Relative humidity/% | 倒S型Inverted sigmoid | 75 | — | — | 80 |
有效磷Available P/(mg·kg-1) | S型Sigmoid | 10 | — | — | 30 |
速效钾Available K/(mg·kg-1) | S型Sigmoid | 50 | — | — | 180 |
有机质Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 抛物线型Parabolic | 15 | 25 | 35 | 45 |
pH值 pH value | 抛物线型Parabolic | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 |
土壤容重Soil bulk density/(g·cm-3) | 抛物线型Parabolic | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
海拔Elevation/m | 抛物线型Parabolic | 60 | 150 | 800 | 1 600 |
坡度Slope/(°) | 倒S型Inverted sigmoid | 6 | — | — | 25 |
指标 Index | 类型 Type | 隶属度 Membership | 指标层 Index layer | 类型 Type | 隶属度 Membership |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
坡向Aspect | 平面Flat | 1.0 | 质地构型 | 薄层型Thin layer type | 0.55 |
北North | 0.3 | Texture configuration | 松散型Loose type | 0.30 | |
东北Northeast | 0.4 | 紧实型Compacttype | 0.75 | ||
东East | 0.5 | 夹层型Mezzaninetype | 0.85 | ||
东南Southeast | 0.8 | 上紧下松型Compact top and loose bottom type | 0.40 | ||
南South | 1.0 | 上松下紧型Loose top and compact bottom type | 1.00 | ||
西南Southwest | 0.7 | 海绵型Sponge type | 0.95 | ||
西West | 0.5 | 土壤类型Soil type | 红壤性土Red soil | 0.95 | |
西北Northwest | 0.2 | 红色石灰土Red lime soil | 0.60 | ||
土壤质地Soil texture | 砂土Sand | 0.60 | 棕红壤Brown-red soil | 0.90 | |
砂壤Sandy soil | 0.85 | 棕色石灰土Brown lime soil | 0.55 | ||
轻壤Light soil | 0.90 | 中性紫色土Neutral purple soil | 0.65 | ||
中壤Middle soil | 1.00 | 典型黄棕壤Typical yellow-brown soil | 0.80 | ||
重壤Heavy soil | 0.95 | 石灰性紫色土Calcareous purple soil | 0.50 | ||
黏土Clay | 0.70 |
表4 散点型指标的隶属度
Table 4 Membership of scattered indexes
指标 Index | 类型 Type | 隶属度 Membership | 指标层 Index layer | 类型 Type | 隶属度 Membership |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
坡向Aspect | 平面Flat | 1.0 | 质地构型 | 薄层型Thin layer type | 0.55 |
北North | 0.3 | Texture configuration | 松散型Loose type | 0.30 | |
东北Northeast | 0.4 | 紧实型Compacttype | 0.75 | ||
东East | 0.5 | 夹层型Mezzaninetype | 0.85 | ||
东南Southeast | 0.8 | 上紧下松型Compact top and loose bottom type | 0.40 | ||
南South | 1.0 | 上松下紧型Loose top and compact bottom type | 1.00 | ||
西南Southwest | 0.7 | 海绵型Sponge type | 0.95 | ||
西West | 0.5 | 土壤类型Soil type | 红壤性土Red soil | 0.95 | |
西北Northwest | 0.2 | 红色石灰土Red lime soil | 0.60 | ||
土壤质地Soil texture | 砂土Sand | 0.60 | 棕红壤Brown-red soil | 0.90 | |
砂壤Sandy soil | 0.85 | 棕色石灰土Brown lime soil | 0.55 | ||
轻壤Light soil | 0.90 | 中性紫色土Neutral purple soil | 0.65 | ||
中壤Middle soil | 1.00 | 典型黄棕壤Typical yellow-brown soil | 0.80 | ||
重壤Heavy soil | 0.95 | 石灰性紫色土Calcareous purple soil | 0.50 | ||
黏土Clay | 0.70 |
指标Index | 适宜性等级Suitability level | 面积Area/km2 | 占比Proportion/% | SI |
---|---|---|---|---|
气候Climate | S1 | 1 403.73 | 57.96 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 231.54 | 9.56 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 309.49 | 12.78 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 476.95 | 19.69 | [0.10,0.65) | |
土壤理化性质 | S1 | 453.76 | 18.74 | [0.79,0.99) |
Soil physical and chemical properties | S2 | 371.80 | 15.35 | [0.74,0.79) |
S3 | 822.76 | 33.97 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 773.38 | 31.94 | [0.10,0.65) | |
地形Terrain | S1 | 747.08 | 30.85 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 313.10 | 12.93 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 640.28 | 26.44 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 721.25 | 29.78 | [0.10,0.65) | |
土质条件Soil condition | S1 | 1 650.07 | 68.14 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 448.78 | 18.53 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 120.69 | 4.98 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 202.16 | 8.35 | [0.10,0.65) | |
土地适宜性Land suitability | S1 | 652.37 | 26.94 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 795.51 | 32.85 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 560.42 | 23.14 | [0.69,0.74) | |
N | 413.40 | 17.07 | [0.10,0.69) |
表5 不同适宜性等级的分布情况
Table 5 Distribution of different suitability categories
指标Index | 适宜性等级Suitability level | 面积Area/km2 | 占比Proportion/% | SI |
---|---|---|---|---|
气候Climate | S1 | 1 403.73 | 57.96 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 231.54 | 9.56 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 309.49 | 12.78 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 476.95 | 19.69 | [0.10,0.65) | |
土壤理化性质 | S1 | 453.76 | 18.74 | [0.79,0.99) |
Soil physical and chemical properties | S2 | 371.80 | 15.35 | [0.74,0.79) |
S3 | 822.76 | 33.97 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 773.38 | 31.94 | [0.10,0.65) | |
地形Terrain | S1 | 747.08 | 30.85 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 313.10 | 12.93 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 640.28 | 26.44 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 721.25 | 29.78 | [0.10,0.65) | |
土质条件Soil condition | S1 | 1 650.07 | 68.14 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 448.78 | 18.53 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 120.69 | 4.98 | [0.65,0.74) | |
N | 202.16 | 8.35 | [0.10,0.65) | |
土地适宜性Land suitability | S1 | 652.37 | 26.94 | [0.79,0.99) |
S2 | 795.51 | 32.85 | [0.74,0.79) | |
S3 | 560.42 | 23.14 | [0.69,0.74) | |
N | 413.40 | 17.07 | [0.10,0.69) |
[1] | 邓秀新, 彭抒昂. 柑橘学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013. |
[2] | 赵祖华, 华琦孜, 李陶桂, 等. 广西全州县柑橘种植的气候适宜性分析及区划[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(35): 13496-13497. |
ZHAO Z H, HUA Q Z, LI T G, et al. Climatic suitability analysis and regionalization of citrus planting in Quanzhou County, Guangxi Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(35): 13496-13497.(in Chinese) | |
[3] | Land and Water Development Division, FAO. A framework for land evaluation[R]. Rome, Italy: FAO, 1976. |
[4] | SYS C, VANRANST E, DEBAVEYE J. Land evaluation: Part I, principles in land evaluation and crop production calculation[M]. Brussels, Belgium: Agricultural Publications, 1991. |
[5] |
AKINCI H, ÖZALP A Y, TURGUT B. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2013, 97: 71-82.
DOI URL |
[6] |
ZHANG J Q, SU Y R, WU J S, et al. GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in Shandong Province of China[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 114: 202-211.
DOI URL |
[7] | 张久权, 梁洪波, 董建新, 等. 基于GIS和模糊集理论的四川烤烟生态适应性评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(3): 8-14. |
ZHANG J Q, LIANG H B, DONG J X, et al. Assessment on ecological adaptability of flue-cured tobacco in Sichuan Province based on GIS and fuzzy set[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2016, 37(3): 8-14.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 桑满杰, 卫海燕, 郭彦龙, 等. 基于模糊数学的秦岭地区山茱萸生境适宜性评价[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(6): 757-765. |
SANG M J, WEI H Y, GUO Y L, et al. Habitat suitability of Cornus officinalis in the Qinling region based on fuzzy mathematics[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 757-765.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] |
ARAGONÉS-BELTRÁN P, CHAPARRO-GONZÁLEZ F, PASTOR-FERRANDO J P, et al. An AHP (analytic hierarchy process)/ANP (analytic network process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects[J]. Energy, 2014, 66: 222-238.
DOI URL |
[10] |
ZABIHI H, AHMAD A, VOGELER I, et al. Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the application of the analytical network process approach and GIS[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 117: 114-126.
DOI URL |
[11] |
DAS P T, TAJO L, GOSWAMI J. Assessment of citrus crop condition in umling block of Ri-BhoiDistrict using RS and GIS technique[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2009, 37(2): 317-324.
DOI URL |
[12] | 刘孜, 黄行凯, 徐宏林, 等. 湖北宜昌鸦鹊岭地区岩石-土壤元素迁移特征及柑橘种植适宜性评价[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(6): 1853-1868. |
LIU Z, HUANG X K, XU H L, et al. Migration characteristics of elements in the rock-soil system and suitability evaluation of orange planting in Yaqueling area, Yichang, Hubei Province[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(6): 1853-1868.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 潘同辉, 徐赐友, 李剑波. 通山县柑橘生产调查分析[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2009(21): 12-13. |
PAN T H, XU C Y, LI J B. Investigation and analysis of citrus production in Tongshan County[J]. Co-Operative Economy & Science, 2009(21): 12-13.(in Chinese) | |
[14] | ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[M]//Advances in fuzzy systems: applications and theory. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 1996: 394-432. |
[15] | 林正雨, 陈强, 邓良基, 等. 四川柑橘适宜分布及其对气候变化的响应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(6): 845-859. |
LIN Z Y, CHEN Q, DENG L J, et al. Response of suitable distribution of citrus in Sichuan Province to climate change[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(6): 845-859.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 刘东海, 乔艳, 谢和平, 等. 夷陵区柑橘园土壤和叶片养分状况研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(5): 237-242. |
LIU D H, QIAO Y, XIE H P, et al. Study on nutrient status of citrus orchard soils and leaves in Yiling[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(5): 237-242.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] |
MOKARRAM M, MIRSOLEIMANI A. Using fuzzy-AHP and order weight average (OWA) methods for land suitability determination for citrus cultivation in ArcGIS (case study: Fars Province, Iran)[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 508: 506-518.
DOI URL |
[18] | 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 王富华, 等. 湖北省柑橘园土壤养分分级研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(4): 390-394. |
LU J W, CHEN F, WANG F H, et al. Study of classification of the soil nutrient status of citrusorchard in Hubei Province[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science, 2002, 8(4): 390-394.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 李有芳, 张超博, 易晓曈, 等. 云南玉溪柑橘园土壤养分状况与分布特征[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(3): 487-493. |
LI Y F, ZHANG C B, YI X T, et al. Characteristics of soil nutrients and frequency distribution of Yuxicitrus orchards in Yunnan[J]. Soils, 2020, 52(3): 487-493.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 周利利, 段增强, 韩庆忠, 等. 秭归县柑橘园土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2019, 35(6): 1346-1353. |
ZHOU L L, DUAN Z Q, HAN Q Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility in citrus orchards in Zigui County[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 35(6): 1346-1353.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] |
MALCZEWSKI J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview[J]. Progress in Planning, 2004, 62(1): 3-65.
DOI URL |
[22] | 江思义, 王启耀, 李春玲, 等. 基于专家-层次分析法的地下空间适宜性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(5): 1290-1299. |
JIANG S Y, WANG Q Y, LI C L, et al. Evaluation suitability for the underground space using expert-analytic hierarchy process[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(5): 1290-1299.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 向莉莉, 陈文德, 廖成云, 等. 基于模糊数学方法的川西南山区农田土壤肥力评价: 以田坝镇耕地土壤为例[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2019, 33(2): 60-65. |
XIANG L L, CHEN W D, LIAO C Y, et al. Soil fertility evaluation of farmland soil in southwest mountain area of Sichuan based on fuzzy mathematics: taking the soil of cultivated land in Tianba Town as an example[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2019, 33(2): 60-65.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 谢华东, 汪璇, 王占伟, 等. 基于GIS和模糊数学的重庆黔江烤烟气候适宜性评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2011, 17(5): 40-45. |
XIE H D, WANG X, WANG Z W, et al. GIS and fuzzy mathematics-based climatic suitability evaluation for tobacco cultivation in Qianjiang, Chongqing[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2011, 17(5): 40-45.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 孟幼青, 汪恩国, 陈吴健, 李艳敏, 程帆, 孟敏霞. 浙江省亚洲柑橘木虱黄龙病病原分布与消长规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 464-469. |
[2] | 黄振东, 蒲占湑, 胡秀荣, 陈国庆, 吕佳, 占红木. 矿物油乳剂对柑橘木虱定殖行为的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 87-95. |
[3] | 杨蕾, 张云贵, 杨海健, 李勋兰, 洪林. 不同青苔发病程度下柑橘叶片营养及叶际生物特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 632-643. |
[4] | 赖家豪, 宋水林, 刘冰. 三株柑橘溃疡病生防内生细菌对脐橙感染溃疡病后几种防御酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1994-2000. |
[5] | 王程宽, 黄振东, 刘兴泉, 洪小玲. 气象因子对红美人柑橘品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1798-1808. |
[6] | 孟幼青, 汪恩国, 李艳敏, 明珂, 袁亦文. 柑橘黄龙病菌PCR阳性病株空间分布格局与参数特征应用研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 579-587. |
[7] | 孟幼青, 翁海勇, 岑海燕, 李红叶, 何勇. 潜伏期柑橘黄龙病宿主糖代谢及近红外光谱特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 428-435. |
[8] | 曹艳, 范铭, 童创, 陆胜民, 杨颖, 邢建荣, 郑美瑜, 唐伟敏, 刘哲. 混菌发酵联合分段控温工艺提高柑橘皮渣可溶性膳食纤维含量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 474-479. |
[9] | 张旭, 王小佳, 黎思辰, 董甜甜, 汪志辉. 柑橘果实粒化过程中木质素生物合成与调控研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2131-2140. |
[10] | 徐霄, 杨锦秀. 我国柑橘全要素生产率变化分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 470-478. |
[11] | 周锦云, 王春苗, 张俊. 柑橘罐头贮藏中色泽变化及其动力学研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 323-329. |
[12] | 冯芳芳, 魏清江, 苏受婷, 宁少君, 廖小娜, 辜青青. 干旱胁迫对2种柑橘幼苗生长形态、渗透调节物质含量和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(9): 1515-1523. |
[13] | 邱霞, 叶霜, 熊博, 廖玲, 孙国超, 荣毅, 罗近予, 代琳, 汪志辉. 十三个柑橘品种叶片光合特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 917-925. |
[14] | 贾亚鹏, 张俊, 陆胜民. 衢州地区柑橘品种罐头加工适应性初探[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(2): 323-331. |
[15] | 陈先锋, 张慧丽, 赵雷. 台湾柠檬上柑橘溃疡病菌的分离鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(1): 101-105. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||