浙江农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 903-912.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.04.17
俞巧钢1(), 姜铭北2, 孙万春1, 黄郑宸1,3, 王峰1, 王强1, 马军伟1,*(
)
收稿日期:
2022-06-01
出版日期:
2023-04-25
发布日期:
2023-05-05
通讯作者:
*马军伟,E-mail:majw111@126.com
作者简介:
俞巧钢(1973—),男,浙江永康人,博士,研究员,主要从事土壤肥料与农业环境保护相关研究。E-mail:yqganghzzj@sina.com
基金资助:
YU Qiaogang1(), JIANG Mingbei2, SUN Wanchun1, HUANG Zhengchen1,3, WANG Feng1, WANG Qiang1, MA Junwei1,*(
)
Received:
2022-06-01
Online:
2023-04-25
Published:
2023-05-05
摘要:
采用野外天然降水径流监测试验,研究以千岛湖库区为代表的南方丘陵茶园的氮磷养分流失特征,以及覆盖秸秆和种植绿肥(鼠茅草,Vulpia myuros)对土壤氮磷养分流失的影响。结果表明,试验区茶园的降水径流主要产生在1—9月,其中,3—7月产流量较大,6月氮磷流失量最高。与常规种植处理相比,茶园覆盖秸秆和种植绿肥处理的径流水量分别显著(P<0.05)减少51.4%和62.0%,泥沙流失量分别显著(P<0.05)减少63.6%和75.8%。硝态氮是茶园土壤无机氮流失的主要形态,总氮的流失量高于总磷。茶园覆盖秸秆和种植绿肥的处理下,土壤氮磷径流流失量较常规种植处理大幅减少,铵态氮流失总量分别显著(P<0.05)下降68.6%和79.4%,硝态氮流失总量分别显著(P<0.05)下降66.2%和75.8%,总氮流失总量分别显著(P<0.05)下降63.4%和75.9%,总磷流失总量分别显著(P<0.05)下降60.7%和72.2%。此外,采用覆盖秸秆和种植绿肥的措施还可提高土壤养分含量,增加茶叶产量,是适于南方丘陵茶园的生态环境友好型耕作模式。
中图分类号:
俞巧钢, 姜铭北, 孙万春, 黄郑宸, 王峰, 王强, 马军伟. 秸秆覆盖和绿肥种植对丘陵茶园氮磷流失的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 903-912.
YU Qiaogang, JIANG Mingbei, SUN Wanchun, HUANG Zhengchen, WANG Feng, WANG Qiang, MA Junwei. Effects of straw mulching and green manure planting on nitrogen and phosphorus runoff loss in hilly tea garden[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 903-912.
图1 试验点小区与径流收集池示意图 1~9为试验小区,①~⑨为径流收集池。试验小区与径流收集池之间通过PVC管相连。
Fig.1 Sketch of test plots and runoff capture tanks Numbers 1-9 show experimental plots, and ①-⑨ show runoff capture tank. The test plots and corresponding collection tanks are connected by PVC pipe.
处理 Treatment | 径流水量 Runoff water/ (m3·hm-2) | 泥沙流失量 Sediment loss/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|
CK | 764.5 a | 36.5 a |
JG | 371.8 b | 13.3 b |
LF | 290.7 c | 8.8 c |
表1 不同处理的径流总量和泥沙流失量
Table 1 Runoff and sediment loss of tea garden under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 径流水量 Runoff water/ (m3·hm-2) | 泥沙流失量 Sediment loss/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|
CK | 764.5 a | 36.5 a |
JG | 371.8 b | 13.3 b |
LF | 290.7 c | 8.8 c |
处理 Treatment | 各月的铵态氮径流流失量Runoff loss of ammonium nitrogen in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.013 a | 0.011 a | 0.204 a | 0.122 a | 0.039 a | 0.438 a | 0.099 a | 0.075 a | 0.016 a |
JG | 0.003 b | 0.003 b | 0.053 b | 0.039 b | 0.012 b | 0.117 b | 0.035 b | 0.046 ab | 0.011 a |
LF | 0.004 b | 0.004 b | 0.032 c | 0.024 c | 0.008 c | 0.071 b | 0.022 b | 0.036 b | 0.009 a |
表2 各处理铵态氮的径流流失量
Table 2 Runoff loss of ammonium nitrogen in tea garden under different treamtments kg·hm-2
处理 Treatment | 各月的铵态氮径流流失量Runoff loss of ammonium nitrogen in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.013 a | 0.011 a | 0.204 a | 0.122 a | 0.039 a | 0.438 a | 0.099 a | 0.075 a | 0.016 a |
JG | 0.003 b | 0.003 b | 0.053 b | 0.039 b | 0.012 b | 0.117 b | 0.035 b | 0.046 ab | 0.011 a |
LF | 0.004 b | 0.004 b | 0.032 c | 0.024 c | 0.008 c | 0.071 b | 0.022 b | 0.036 b | 0.009 a |
处理 Treatment | 各月的硝态氮径流流失量Runoff loss of nitrate nitrogen in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.253 a | 0.219 a | 0.343 a | 0.850 a | 0.235 a | 1.862 a | 0.220 a | 0.100 a | 0.079 a |
JG | 0.078 b | 0.100 b | 0.116 b | 0.271 b | 0.089 b | 0.562 b | 0.061 b | 0.065 b | 0.064 ab |
LF | 0.098 b | 0.050 c | 0.084 c | 0.185 c | 0.057 c | 0.396 c | 0.035 b | 0.051 b | 0.048 b |
表3 各处理硝态氮的径流流失量
Table 3 Runoff loss of nitrate nitrogen in tea garden under different treatments kg·hm-2
处理 Treatment | 各月的硝态氮径流流失量Runoff loss of nitrate nitrogen in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.253 a | 0.219 a | 0.343 a | 0.850 a | 0.235 a | 1.862 a | 0.220 a | 0.100 a | 0.079 a |
JG | 0.078 b | 0.100 b | 0.116 b | 0.271 b | 0.089 b | 0.562 b | 0.061 b | 0.065 b | 0.064 ab |
LF | 0.098 b | 0.050 c | 0.084 c | 0.185 c | 0.057 c | 0.396 c | 0.035 b | 0.051 b | 0.048 b |
处理 Treatment | 各月的总氮径流流失量Runoff loss of total nitrogen in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.409 a | 0.295 a | 0.470 a | 1.198 a | 0.574 a | 2.841 a | 0.337 a | 0.207 a | 0.107 a |
JG | 0.083 b | 0.122 b | 0.184 b | 0.397 b | 0.176 b | 1.067 b | 0.116 b | 0.132 ab | 0.082 ab |
LF | 0.119 b | 0.086 b | 0.124 c | 0.216 c | 0.096 b | 0.641 c | 0.087 c | 0.105 b | 0.074 b |
表4 各处理总氮的径流流失量
Table 4 Runoff loss of total nitrogen in tea garden under different treatments kg·hm-2
处理 Treatment | 各月的总氮径流流失量Runoff loss of total nitrogen in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.409 a | 0.295 a | 0.470 a | 1.198 a | 0.574 a | 2.841 a | 0.337 a | 0.207 a | 0.107 a |
JG | 0.083 b | 0.122 b | 0.184 b | 0.397 b | 0.176 b | 1.067 b | 0.116 b | 0.132 ab | 0.082 ab |
LF | 0.119 b | 0.086 b | 0.124 c | 0.216 c | 0.096 b | 0.641 c | 0.087 c | 0.105 b | 0.074 b |
处理 Treatment | 各月的总磷径流流失量Runoff loss of total phosphorus in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.024 a | 0.017 a | 0.023 a | 0.105 a | 0.072 a | 0.139 a | 0.030 a | 0.031 a | 0.013 a |
JG | 0.009 b | 0.004 b | 0.007 b | 0.040 b | 0.030 b | 0.058 b | 0.012 b | 0.012 b | 0.006 b |
LF | 0.013 b | 0.002 b | 0.004 b | 0.024 c | 0.020 c | 0.042 c | 0.010 b | 0.007 b | 0.005 b |
表5 各处理总磷的径流流失量
Table 5 Runoff loss of total phosphorus in tea garden under different treatments kg·hm-2
处理 Treatment | 各月的总磷径流流失量Runoff loss of total phosphorus in different month | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
CK | 0.024 a | 0.017 a | 0.023 a | 0.105 a | 0.072 a | 0.139 a | 0.030 a | 0.031 a | 0.013 a |
JG | 0.009 b | 0.004 b | 0.007 b | 0.040 b | 0.030 b | 0.058 b | 0.012 b | 0.012 b | 0.006 b |
LF | 0.013 b | 0.002 b | 0.004 b | 0.024 c | 0.020 c | 0.042 c | 0.010 b | 0.007 b | 0.005 b |
处理 Treatment | 全氮 Total N/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 产量(鲜重) Yield (fresh weight)/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.47 b | 184 b | 262 b | 249 c | 53.7 b | 971.7 b |
JG | 2.83 a | 200 ab | 290 a | 296 a | 59.3 a | 1 034.6 a |
LF | 2.91 a | 208 a | 297 a | 273 b | 58.1 a | 1 018.4 a |
表6 不同处理下茶园土壤的养分含量与茶叶产量
Table 6 Soil nutrients contents and tea yield under different treatments in tea garden
处理 Treatment | 全氮 Total N/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolysis N/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 产量(鲜重) Yield (fresh weight)/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.47 b | 184 b | 262 b | 249 c | 53.7 b | 971.7 b |
JG | 2.83 a | 200 ab | 290 a | 296 a | 59.3 a | 1 034.6 a |
LF | 2.91 a | 208 a | 297 a | 273 b | 58.1 a | 1 018.4 a |
指标Index | AN | NN | TN | TP |
---|---|---|---|---|
径流水量 | 0.857** | 0.861** | 0.894** | 0.899** |
Water runoff | ||||
AN | 0.832** | 0.878** | 0.707** | |
NN | 0.984** | 0.898** | ||
TN | 0.891** |
表7 茶园径流水量与氮磷流失总量负荷的相关分析
Table 7 Correlation analysis of water runoff and nitrogen and phosphorus losses in tea garden
指标Index | AN | NN | TN | TP |
---|---|---|---|---|
径流水量 | 0.857** | 0.861** | 0.894** | 0.899** |
Water runoff | ||||
AN | 0.832** | 0.878** | 0.707** | |
NN | 0.984** | 0.898** | ||
TN | 0.891** |
指标Index | SAN | SAP | SAK | SOM | WR | SL | TN | TP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN | 0.987 | 0.999* | 0.776 | 0.931* | -1.000** | -1.000* | -1.000* | -1.000* |
SAN | 0.993 | 0.664 | 0.859 | -0.985* | -0.983* | -0.984* | -0.983* | |
SAP | 0.750 | 0.915 | -0.999* | -0.999* | -0.998* | -0.998* | ||
SAK | 0.953* | -0.783 | -0.789 | -0.786 | -0.790 | |||
SOM | -0.934 | -0.937 | -0.936 | -0.938 | ||||
WR | 1.000** | 1.000** | 1.000** | |||||
SL | 1.000** | 1.000** | ||||||
TN | 1.000** |
表8 土壤肥力指标与氮磷流失总量负荷的相关分析
Table 8 Correlation analysis of soil fertility and nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses
指标Index | SAN | SAP | SAK | SOM | WR | SL | TN | TP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN | 0.987 | 0.999* | 0.776 | 0.931* | -1.000** | -1.000* | -1.000* | -1.000* |
SAN | 0.993 | 0.664 | 0.859 | -0.985* | -0.983* | -0.984* | -0.983* | |
SAP | 0.750 | 0.915 | -0.999* | -0.999* | -0.998* | -0.998* | ||
SAK | 0.953* | -0.783 | -0.789 | -0.786 | -0.790 | |||
SOM | -0.934 | -0.937 | -0.936 | -0.938 | ||||
WR | 1.000** | 1.000** | 1.000** | |||||
SL | 1.000** | 1.000** | ||||||
TN | 1.000** |
[1] | 赵越, 李泽利, 刘茂辉, 等. 模拟降雨条件下坡度对茶园红壤氮素流失影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(5): 992-998. |
ZHAO Y, LI Z L, LIU M H, et al. Impacts of slope on nitrogen losses from red soil in tea garden under simulated rainfall[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014, 33(5): 992-998. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 席运官, 陈瑞冰, 李国平, 等. 太湖流域坡地茶园径流流失规律[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(4): 381-385. |
XI Y G, CHEN R B, LI G P, et al. Surface runoff in tea gardens on slope land in Taihu Lake region[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010, 26(4): 381-385. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 巩龙达, 郭德浩, 金树权, 等. 不同种植年限茶园土壤氮磷养分流失规律[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(2): 280-283. |
GONG L D, GUO D H, JIN S Q, et al. Regular pattern of nitrogen and phosphorus losses in tea plantation with different cultivation years[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(2): 280-283. (in Chinese) | |
[4] |
SHI K, ZHANG Y L, SONG K S, et al. A semi-analytical approach for remote sensing of trophic state in inland waters: bio-optical mechanism and application[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 232: 111349.
DOI URL |
[5] | 张亚丽, 张兴昌, 邵明安, 等. 秸秆覆盖对黄土坡面矿质氮素径流流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(1): 85-88. |
ZHANG Y L, ZHANG X C, SHAO M A, et al. Impact of straw cover on mineral nitrogen loss by runoff on loess slope[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2004, 18(1): 85-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[6] | 孙承冕, 张艳梅, 朱兴正, 等. 茶园免耕覆盖农作物秸秆的生态效应[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(21): 310-311. |
SUN C M, ZHANG Y M, ZHU X Z, et al. Ecological effects of no-tillage mulching crop straw in tea garden[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(21): 310-311. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 陈小英, 查轩, 陈世发. 山地茶园水土流失及生态调控措施研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(1): 51-54. |
CHEN X Y, ZHA X, CHEN S F. Research on the soil and water loss and ecological treatment measures in hilly tea plantation[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(1): 51-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 栾好安, 王晓雨, 韩上, 等. 三峡库区橘园种植绿肥对土壤养分流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2): 68-72. |
LUAN H A, WANG X Y, HAN S, et al. Effects of green manure planting on loss of soil nutrient in citrus orchard in Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(2): 68-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] |
李太魁, 张香凝, 郭战玲, 等. 覆盖与间作对丹江口库区坡地茶园氮磷流失和土壤环境的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(3): 543-549.
DOI |
LI T K, ZHANG X N, GUO Z L, et al. Effects of mulching and intercropping on nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses from sloping land and soil environment of tea garden in the Danjiangkou reservoir area[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(3): 543-549. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 赵雪淞, 宋王芳, 高欣, 等. 秸秆还田和耕作方式对花生土壤微生物量、酶活性和产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(3): 126-132. |
ZHAO X S, SONG W F, GAO X, et al. Effects of straw returning and tillage methods on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity and yield of peanut[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(3): 126-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 方丽, 王涛, 柏德林, 等. 适宜茶园种植的生态绿肥: 鼠茅草[J]. 中国茶叶, 2021, 43(4): 59-61. |
FANG L, WANG T, BAI D L, et al. Ecological green manure suitable for tea garden planting: Salvia[J]. China Tea, 2021, 43(4): 59-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] |
樊志龙, 柴强, 曹卫东, 等. 绿肥在我国旱地农业生态系统中的服务功能及其应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1389-1402.
DOI |
FAN Z L, CHAI Q, CAO W D, et al. Ecosystem service function of green manure and its application in dryland agriculture of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(4): 1389-1402. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 丁怡飞, 曹永庆, 姚小华, 等. 油茶-鼠茅草复合系统细根空间分布及地下竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 981-986. |
DING Y F, CAO Y Q, YAO X H, et al. Spatial distribution of fine roots and underground competition in Camellia oleifera-Vulpia myuros intercropping system[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(4): 981-986. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 郝淑英, 刘蝴蝶, 牛俊玲, 等. 黄土高原区果园生草覆盖对土壤物理性状、水分及产量的影响[J]. 土壤肥料, 2003(1): 25-27. |
HAO S Y, LIU H D, NIU J L, et al. Effects of herbage-mulching to the apple yield and soil water and other soil physical properties in the Loess Plateau[J]. Soils and Fertilizers, 2003(1): 25-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. |
[16] | 刘燕青, 王计磊, 李子忠. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水分和侵蚀的影响研究进展[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6): 429-436. |
LIU Y Q, WANG J L, LI Z Z. Research process on the effects of straw mulch on soil moisture and soil erosion[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(6): 429-436. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] |
COMINO J R, RUIZ SINOGA J D, SENCIALES GONZÁLEZ J M, et al. High variability of soil erosion and hydrological processes in Mediterranean hillslope vineyards (Montes de Málaga, Spain)[J]. CATENA, 2016, 145: 274-284.
DOI URL |
[18] | 白永会, 查轩, 查瑞波, 等. 秸秆覆盖红壤径流养分流失效益及径流剪切力影响研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(6): 94-99. |
BAI Y H, ZHA X, ZHA R B, et al. Effects of straw mulching on soil erosion benefits and runoff shear force under simulated rainfall[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(6): 94-99. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] |
YANG J H, LIU H Q, LEI T W, et al. Effect of straw-incorporation into farming soil layer on surface runoff under simulated rainfall[J]. CATENA, 2021, 199: 105082.
DOI URL |
[20] | 马立锋, 杨向德, 王涛, 等. “鼠茅草+有机肥+茶树专用肥”高效施用技术模式[J]. 中国茶叶, 2020, 42(4): 48-49. |
MA L F, YANG X D, WANG T, et al. ‘Vulpia myuros+organic fertilizer+tea specific fertilizer’ efficient application technology mode[J]. China Tea, 2020, 42(4): 48-49. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 李海茹, 广彗冰, 刘刚, 等. 有机质影响溅蚀破坏土壤团聚体的主要作用机制[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1): 106-114. |
LI H R, GUANG H B, LIU G, et al. Mechanism of effects of soil organic matter on splash erosion disintegrating aggregates[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(1): 106-114. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 李成亮, 孔宏敏, 何园球. 施肥结构对旱地红壤有机质和物理性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(6): 116-119. |
LI C L, KONG H M, HE Y Q. Effect of fertilization structures on soil organic matter and physical properties of upland field in red soil area[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2004, 18(6): 116-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[23] | 徐畅, 谢德体, 高明, 等. 三峡库区小流域旱坡地氮磷流失特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(1): 1-5. |
XU C, XIE D T, GAO M, et al. Study on the nitrogen and phosphorus loss characteristics from sloping uplands in small watershed of Three Gorges reservoir region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 吴志丹, 江福英, 尤志明, 等. 亚热带茶园土壤酸度特征研究: 以福建省武夷山市为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(1): 181-189. |
WU Z D, JIANG F Y, YOU Z M, et al. Acidic characteristics of subtropical tea garden soil: a case study in Wuyishan City, Fujian Province, Southeast China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016, 36(1): 181-189. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 付海曼, 贾黎明. 土壤对氮、磷吸附/解吸附特性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(21): 198-203. |
FU H M, JIA L M. Study progress of nitrogen and phosphate adsorption & desorption in soils[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(21): 198-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] |
杨洪晓, 周美华, 李俊良, 等. 温带果园护土生草鼠茅草的腐解和养分释放[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4): 208-213.
DOI |
YANG H X, ZHOU M H, LI J L, et al. Decay and nutrient release in Vulpia myuros grasses, a species suitable for soil conservation in temperate zone orchards[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(4): 208-213. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 夏苏敬, 乔月, 朱建强. 调整氮肥基追比减少稻田氮素损失和保证直播稻产量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2482-2490. |
[2] | 刘琛, 张莉, 林义成, 郭彬, 傅庆林, 李华, 丁能飞. 不同施肥模式下苕溪流域水稻田和蔬菜地氮磷流失规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2): 297-306. |
[3] | 陈重军, 刘玉学, 冯宇, 王建芳. 添加竹炭对设施菜地土壤氮磷流失和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 123-128. |
[4] | 金树权1,陈若霞1,罗艳2,姚红燕1,周金波1. 不同施肥处理对苗木地地表径流氮磷流失的影响 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(3): 412-. |
[5] | 吴才武,夏建新*. 保护性耕作的水土保持机理及其在东北黑土区的推广建议[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(2): 254-. |
[6] | 焦瑞锋;张鸿睿;卞新民;*. 稻田降雨径流扰动系数的解析分析[J]. , 2012, 24(5): 0-903. |
[7] | 王京文;孙吉林;张奇春;杨文叶. 西湖名胜区茶园地表径流水的氮磷流失研究[J]. , 2012, 24(4): 0-679. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||