不同种植年限茭白田土壤的有机碳含量与结构特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231086

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 2558-2565.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231086

不同种植年限茭白田土壤的有机碳含量与结构特征

艾然¹^,²(), 何杰³, 林海忠³, 翁丽青⁴, 陈照明², 马军伟², 王强²^,^*()

1.浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,浙江杭州 311300
2.浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所,浙江杭州 310021
3.台州市黄岩区农业农村局,浙江台州 318020
4.余姚市农业农村局,浙江余姚 315400

收稿日期:2023-09-11 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-11-27
作者简介:艾然(1999—),男,安徽马鞍山人,硕士,主要从事耕地质量培育与提升研究。E-mail: 719054708@qq.com
通讯作者: *王强,E-mail: qwang0571@126.com
基金资助:
台州市黄岩区农业绿色发展先行先试支持体系建设服务项目(HY202001);优质稻全产业链绿色发展模式集成示范(202201)

Soil organic carbon content and structural characteristics in water bamboo fields with different cultivation time

AI Ran¹^,²(), HE Jie³, LIN Haizhong³, WENG Liqing⁴, CHEN Zhaoming², MA Junwei², WANG Qiang²^,^*()

1. College of Environment and Resources, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2. Institute of Environmental Resources and Soil Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
3. Huangyan Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Taizhou 318020, Zhejiang, China
4. Yuyao Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, China

Received:2023-09-11 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究茭白种植年限对土壤有机碳(SOC)含量和结构特征的影响,以浙江余姚和黄岩两地不同种植年限的茭白田土壤(黄岩的种植年限为0、5、15、30 a,余姚的种植年限为1、5、15 a)为对象,采集0~20、>20~40 cm土层样品,测定土壤颗粒有机碳(POC)含量,并通过固态碳-13核磁共振技术(¹³C NMR)对SOC官能团丰度进行检测。结果表明:在黄岩试验点,0~20 cm茭白田的SOC含量随种植年限的增加而增加,但茭白种植年限对>20~40 cm土层的SOC含量无显著影响,与未种植茭白的农田相比,种植30 a茭白田的0~20 cm土层的SOC、POC含量分别显著(P<0.05)升高40.3%、86.4%,POC占SOC的比例显著增加12百分点,但土壤烷基碳比例显著降低5.96百分点,>20~40 cm土层的烷基碳比例显著下降9.53百分点,而芳香碳比例显著升高4.31百分点。在余姚试验点,各种植年限茭白田0~20、>20~40 cm土层的SOC官能团丰度和>20~40 cm土层的SOC、POC含量均无显著差异,但与种植1 a茭白的相比,种植5 a茭白田0~20 cm土层的SOC、 POC含量分别显著提高41.0%、87.1%,POC占SOC的比例显著增加10百分点。综上,茭白种植可以提高0~20 cm土层的SOC含量和POC含量,但随着种植年限的增加,土壤有机碳的稳定性减弱。

关键词: 茭白, 种植年限, 土壤有机碳, 有机碳组分, 碳-13核磁共振(¹³C NMR)

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of water bamboo cultivation time on soil organic carbon (SOC) content and structural characteristics, soil samples were collected from 0-20 cm and >20-40 cm layer from water bamboo fields with different planting years in Huangyan District and Yuyao City in Zhejiang Province, China, (in Huangyan, the water bamboo cultivation time was 0, 5, 15, 30 a, respectively; in Yuyao, the water bamboo cultivation time was 1, 5, 15 a, respectively). The soil particulate organic carbon (POC) content was determined, and the SOC functional group abundance was detected by solid-state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C NMR). The results showed that, the SOC content in 0-20 cm layer of water bamboo field increased with the prolonged cultivation time, but the cultivation time did not significantly affect the SOC content in >20-40 cm soil layer in Huangyan. Besides, compared with the filed without water bamboo cultivation, the contents of SOC and POC content in the 0-20 cm soil layer of water bamboo field cultivated for 30 a in Huangyan were significantly (P<0.05) increased by 40.3%, 86.4%, respectively, the proportion of POC in SOC in 0-20 cm soil layer was significantly increased by 12 percentage points, the proportion of alkyl-C was significantly decreased by 5.96, 9.53 percentage points in the 0-20, >20-40 cm soil layer, respectively, and the proportion of aromatic-C was significantly increased by 4.31 percentage points in the >20-40 soil layer. In Yuyao, the SOC functional group abundance in both 0-20 and >20-40 cm soil layer and the contents of SOC, POC in >20-40 cm soil layer were not significantly influenced by the cultivation time. Compared with the water bamboo field cultivated for 1 a, the contents of SOC and POC in the 0-20 cm soil layer of the water bamboo field cultivated for 5 a were significantly increased by 41.0%, 87.1%, respectively, and the proportion of POC in SOC was significantly increased by 10 percentage points. In general, water bamboo planting could increase the SOC content and POC content in 0-20 cm soil layer, yet the prolonged cultivation of water bamboo could weaken the stability of soil organic carbon.

Key words: water bamboo, cultivation time, soil organic carbon, organic carbon fraction, carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C NMR)

中图分类号:

S318

艾然, 何杰, 林海忠, 翁丽青, 陈照明, 马军伟, 王强. 不同种植年限茭白田土壤的有机碳含量与结构特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2558-2565.

AI Ran, HE Jie, LIN Haizhong, WENG Liqing, CHEN Zhaoming, MA Junwei, WANG Qiang. Soil organic carbon content and structural characteristics in water bamboo fields with different cultivation time[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2558-2565.

图/表 4

参考文献 42

[1]	OECHAIYAPHUM K, ULLAH H, SHRESTHA R P, et al. Impact of long-term agricultural management practices on soil organic carbon and soil fertility of paddy fields in Northeastern Thailand[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2020, 22: e00307.
[2]	WIESMEIER M, URBANSKI L, HOBLEY E, et al. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils: a review of drivers and indicators at various scales[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 333: 149-162.
[3]	LAL R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5677): 1623-1627.
[4]	LAN X J, SHAN J, HUANG Y, et al. Effects of long-term manure substitution regimes on soil organic carbon composition in a red paddy soil of Southern China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022, 221: 105395.
[5]	AHN J H, CHOI M Y, KIM B Y, et al. Effects of water-saving irrigation on emissions of greenhouse gases and prokaryotic communities in rice paddy soil[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2014, 68(2): 271-283.
[6]	ZHAO Z Z, ZHAO Z Y, FU B, et al. Characteristics of soil organic carbon fractions under different land use patterns in a tropical area[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21(2): 689-697.
[7]	KAMRAN M, HUANG L, NIE J, et al. Effect of reduced mineral fertilization (NPK) combined with green manure on aggregate stability and soil organic carbon fractions in a fluvo-aquic paddy soil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 211: 105005.
[8]	TANG H M, CHENG K K, SHI L H, et al. Effects of long-term organic matter application on soil carbon accumulation and nitrogen use efficiency in a double-cropping rice field[J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 213: 113700.
[9]	寿森炎, 姜芳, 陈可可, 等. 浙江设施茭白栽培技术综述与发展趋势[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2009(16): 102-103.
	SHOU S Y, JIANG F, CHEN K K, et al. Summarization and development orientation of Zizania latifolia Turcz. in Zhejiang in greenhouse[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2009(16): 102-103. (in Chinese)
[10]	CHENG H M, SHU K X, ZHU T Y, et al. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield, water and nitrogen use, and greenhouse gas emissions in rice paddy fields[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 349: 131487.
[11]	俞晓平, 李建荣, 施建苗, 等. 水生蔬菜茭白及其无害化生产技术[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2003, 15(3): 109-117.
	YU X P, LI J R, SHI J M, et al. The aquatic vegetable, Jiaobai (Zizania caduciflora L.) and its safe production in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2003, 15(3): 109-117. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	TIAN J, LU S H, FAN M S, et al. Integrated management systems and N fertilization: effect on soil organic matter in rice-rapeseed rotation[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 372(1): 53-63.
[13]	WU J. Carbon accumulation in paddy ecosystems in subtropical China: evidence from landscape studies[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 62(1): 29-34.
[14]	QASWAR M, HUANG J, AHMED W, et al. Yield sustainability, soil organic carbon sequestration and nutrients balance under long-term combined application of manure and inorganic fertilizers in acidic paddy soil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 198: 104569.
[15]	LI S, ZHANG S R, PU Y L, et al. Dynamics of soil labile organic carbon fractions and C-cycle enzyme activities under straw mulch in Chengdu Plain[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016, 155: 289-297.
[16]	BENBI D K, BOPARAI A K, BRAR K. Decomposition of particulate organic matter is more sensitive to temperature than the mineral associated organic matter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 70: 183-192.
[17]	SHARMA V, HUSSAIN S, SHARMA K R, et al. Labile carbon pools and soil organic carbon stocks in the foothill Himalayas under different land use systems[J]. Geoderma, 2014, 232: 81-87.
[18]	周正虎, 刘琳, 侯磊. 土壤有机碳的稳定和形成:机制和模型[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(10): 11-22.
	ZHOU Z H, LIU L, HOU L. Soil organic carbon stabilization and formation: mechanism and model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(10): 11-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	杭子清, 王国祥, 刘金娥, 等. 互花米草盐沼土壤有机碳库组分及结构特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(15): 4175-4182.
	HANG Z Q, WANG G X, LIU J E, et al. Characterization of soil organic carbon fractions at Spartina alterniflora saltmarsh in North Jiangsu[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(15): 4175-4182. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	WANG A N, ZHA T G, ZHANG Z Q. Variations in soil organic carbon storage and stability with vegetation restoration stages on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. CATENA, 2023, 228: 107142.
[21]	王学霞, 张磊, 梁丽娜, 等. 秸秆还田对麦玉系统土壤有机碳稳定性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(8): 1774-1782.
	WANG X X, ZHANG L, LIANG L N, et al. Effects of straw returning on the stability of soil organic carbon in wheat-maize rotation systems[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(8): 1774-1782. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	季淮. 洪泽湖河湖交汇区不同土地覆被/利用类型土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2021.
	JI H. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil organic carbon in different cover/use types of wetland at the confluence of Hongze Lake and Huai River[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	LI Z Q, ZHAO B Z, WANG Q Y, et al. Differences in chemical composition of soil organic carbon resulting from long-term fertilization strategies[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0124359.
[24]	BERNS A E, CONTE P. Effect of ramp size and sample spinning speed on CPMAS ¹³C NMR spectra of soil organic matter[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(8): 926-935.
[25]	KNICKER H. Solid state CPMAS ¹³C and ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy in organic geochemistry and how spin dynamics can either aggravate or improve spectra interpretation[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(8): 867-890.
[26]	CHEN X F, LIU M, KUZYAKOV Y, et al. Incorporation of rice straw carbon into dissolved organic matter and microbial biomass along a 100-year paddy soil chronosequence[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2018, 130: 84-90.
[27]	SIX J, ELLIOTT E, PAUSTIAN K, et al. Aggregation and soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1998, 62(5): 1367-1377.
[28]	LAGANIÈRE J, BOČA A, MIEGROET H, et al. A tree species effect on soil that is consistent across the species’ range: the case of aspen and soil carbon in North America[J]. Forests, 2017, 8: 113.
[29]	WANG H, HAGEDORN J, SVENDSEN A, et al. Variant of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase with improved kinetic stability: a candidate for enzyme replacement therapy[J]. Biophysical Chemistry, 2013, 172: 43-52.
[30]	GUAN S, AN N, ZONG N, et al. Climate warming impacts on soil organic carbon fractions and aggregate stability in a Tibetan alpine meadow[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 116: 224-236.
[31]	SINGH B, RENGEL Z. The role of crop residues in improving soil fertility[M]// MARSCHNER P, RENGEL Z. Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 183-214.
[32]	NDUNG’U M, NGATIA L W, ONWONGA R N, et al. The influence of organic and inorganic nutrient inputs on soil organic carbon functional groups content and maize yields[J]. Heliyon, 2021, 7(8): e07881.
[33]	SPACCINI R, MBAGWU J S C, CONTE P, et al. Changes of humic substances characteristics from forested to cultivated soils in Ethiopia[J]. Geoderma, 2006, 132(1/2): 9-19.
[34]	GHOSH B N, MEENA V S, SINGH R J, et al. Effects of fertilization on soil aggregation, carbon distribution and carbon management index of maize-wheat rotation in the north-western Indian Himalayas[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 105: 415-424.
[35]	杨良觎. 长期连作茭白和秸秆全量还田对农田土壤质量的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
	YANG L Y. Effects of long-term plantation of Zizania latifolia and straw total return on soil quality of farmland[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	李玮, 郑子成, 李廷轩, 等. 不同植茶年限土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(21): 6326-6336.
	LI W, ZHENG Z C, LI T X, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil aggregates and its organic carbon in different tea plantation age[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(21): 6326-6336. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	HOBLEY E U, BALDOCK J, WILSON B. Environmental and human influences on organic carbon fractions down the soil profile[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 223: 152-166.
[38]	DAI W, GAO H, SHA Z M, et al. Changes in soil organic carbon fractions in response to wheat straw incorporation in a subtropical paddy field in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2021, 184(2): 198-207.
[39]	WANG H, GUAN D S, ZHANG R D, et al. Soil aggregates and organic carbon affected by the land use change from rice paddy to vegetable field[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 70: 206-211.
[40]	WANG X T, CHEN R R, JING Z W, et al. Root derived carbon transport extends the rhizosphere of rice compared to wheat[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 122: 211-219.
[41]	GE T D, LUO Y, HE X H. Quantitative and mechanistic insights into the key process in the rhizodeposited carbon stabilization, transformation and utilization of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in paddy soil[J]. Plant and Soil, 2019, 445(1): 1-5.
[42]	徐颖菲, 姚玉才, 章明奎. 全年淹水种植茭白对水田土壤性态的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(1): 15-21.
	XU Y F, YAO Y C, ZHANG M K. Effects of Zizania latifolia plantation with the whole year water-logging on soil properties of paddy fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 50(1): 15-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)

土层 Soil layer/cm	种植年限 Cultivation time/a	SOC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/SOC
0~20	0	35.67±3.88 c	12.81±1.14 b	0.36±0.00 b
	5	46.26±2.32 ab	21.24±1.14 a	0.45±0.01 a
	15	41.26±2.54 b	14.93±1.00 b	0.36±0.04 b
	30	50.05±2.09 a	23.88±1.80 a	0.48±0.02 a
>20~40	0	29.51±5.67 a	6.68±0.07 a	0.25±0.05 a
	5	33.00±3.48 a	8.20±4.91 a	0.24±0.13 a
	15	30.05±8.39 a	6.55±0.00 a	0.22±0.08 a
	30	24.74±2.53 a	3.59±1.18 a	0.14±0.03 a

土层 Soil layer/cm	种植年限 Cultivation time/a	SOC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/SOC
0~20	0	35.67±3.88 c	12.81±1.14 b	0.36±0.00 b
	5	46.26±2.32 ab	21.24±1.14 a	0.45±0.01 a
	15	41.26±2.54 b	14.93±1.00 b	0.36±0.04 b
	30	50.05±2.09 a	23.88±1.80 a	0.48±0.02 a
>20~40	0	29.51±5.67 a	6.68±0.07 a	0.25±0.05 a
	5	33.00±3.48 a	8.20±4.91 a	0.24±0.13 a
	15	30.05±8.39 a	6.55±0.00 a	0.22±0.08 a
	30	24.74±2.53 a	3.59±1.18 a	0.14±0.03 a

土层 Soil layer/cm	种植年限 Cultivation time/a	SOC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/SOC
0~20	1	27.98±0.58 b	6.88±0.58 b	0.25±0.02 b
	5	39.46±4.25 a	12.87±1.23 a	0.35±0.01 a
	15	33.50±2.87 ab	11.74±0.50 a	0.33±0.02 a
>20~40	1	28.03±2.22 a	7.62±0.11 a	0.26±0.00 a
	5	28.69±1.43 a	6.92±1.71 a	0.25±0.05 a
	15	32.21±4.86 a	8.84±0.00 a	0.29±0.05 a

土层 Soil layer/cm	种植年限 Cultivation time/a	SOC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/(g·kg^-1)	POC/SOC
0~20	1	27.98±0.58 b	6.88±0.58 b	0.25±0.02 b
	5	39.46±4.25 a	12.87±1.23 a	0.35±0.01 a
	15	33.50±2.87 ab	11.74±0.50 a	0.33±0.02 a
>20~40	1	28.03±2.22 a	7.62±0.11 a	0.26±0.00 a
	5	28.69±1.43 a	6.92±1.71 a	0.25±0.05 a
	15	32.21±4.86 a	8.84±0.00 a	0.29±0.05 a

土层 Soil layer/cm	种植年限 Cultivation time/a	烷基碳比例 Proportion of alkyl C/%	烷氧碳比例 Proportion of O-alkyl C/%	芳香碳比例 Proportion of aromatic C/%	羰基碳比例 Proportion of carboxyl C/%	烷基度 Alkylation	疏水度 Hydrophobicity
0~20	0	39.23±1.81 a	39.16±9.37 a	11.52±2.50 a	10.08±8.76 a	1.03±0.21 a	1.03±0.03 a
	5	38.38±0.91 a	37.53±4.04 a	9.74±1.07 a	14.35±2.20 a	1.03±0.14 a	0.93±0.07 b
	15	36.66±0.84 a	37.79±1.27 a	11.33±0.36 a	14.22±0.88 a	0.97±0.05 a	0.92±0.02 b
	30	33.27±3.53 b	39.03±1.22 a	12.49±1.93 a	15.21±1.06 a	0.85±0.11 a	0.85±0.06 b
>20~40	0	43.38±4.87 a	41.16±8.40 a	6.88±2.43 b	8.58±7.47 a	1.10±0.35 a	1.02±0.14 a
	5	35.00±5.16 b	38.22±5.08 a	11.79±1.71 a	15.00±1.63 a	0.94±0.26 a	0.88±0.12 a
	15	38.94±1.48 ab	37.08±4.56 a	9.80±0.42 a	14.18±2.71 a	1.06±0.16 a	0.95±0.07 a
	30	33.85±2.60 b	42.12±3.02 a	11.19±1.23 a	12.85±1.62 a	0.81±0.12 a	0.82±0.05 a

不同种植年限茭白田土壤的有机碳含量与结构特征

Soil organic carbon content and structural characteristics in water bamboo fields with different cultivation time

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

土层 Soil layer/cm	种植年限 Cultivation time/a	烷基碳比例 Proportion of alkyl C/%	烷氧碳比例 Proportion of O-alkyl C/%	芳香碳比例 Proportion of aromatic C/%	羰基碳比例 Proportion of carboxyl C/%	烷基度 Alkylation	疏水度 Hydrophobicity
0~20	0	38.33±1.59 a	31.22±4.64 a	15.43±1.26 a	15.01±5.18 a	1.25±0.20 a	1.16±0.05 a
	5	37.99±2.92 a	31.15±2.09 a	15.47±1.76 a	15.38±1.03 a	1.23±0.17 a	1.15±0.09 a
	15	41.78±5.16 a	29.23±3.50 a	14.75±1.67 a	14.24±2.63 a	1.46±0.34 a	1.31±0.22 a
>20~40	0	38.40±4.60 a	31.44±7.62 a	13.47±0.15 a	16.69±3.10 a	1.29±0.40 a	1.09±0.19 a
	5	41.44±9.20 a	36.40±7.28 a	12.06±6.08 a	10.10±8.75 a	1.15±0.25 a	1.16±0.16 a
	15	37.45±1.25 a	34.39±2.15 a	15.12±0.28 a	13.04±2.49 a	1.09±0.07 a	1.11±0.05 a

[1]	徐君言, 裘高扬, 刘俊丽, 郭彬, 李华, 陈晓冬, 王鸢, 傅庆林. 蒙脱石、高岭石与玄武岩对土壤碳固存的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1867-1877.
[2]	郭威良, 吴剑, 张兴一龙, 吴可荆, 谢佳家, 冯海林. 茭白秆水解制备高价值呋喃平台化合物研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 870-880.
[3]	查贵超, 孙向阳, 李素艳, 于雷, 岳宗伟, 王晨晨, 魏宁娴, 徐浠婕. 北京市通州区不同绿地类型的土壤有机碳及其组分特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1699-1708.
[4]	单英杰, 任白琳, 陈宇航, 丁志峰, 章明奎. 茭白田土壤磷库特征及其与种植年限的关系和流失风险[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2645-2654.
[5]	简兴, 翟晓钰, 王喻, 蔡阳阳. 土地利用方式改变对湿地土壤总有机碳与可溶性有机碳的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 475-482.
[6]	朱伟成, 郜海燕, 韩延超, 李大祥, 陈杭君. 不同预冷方式对茭白采后降温速度和贮藏品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1873-1879.
[7]	陶利波, 王建军, 王国会, 于双, 李惠惠, 许冬梅. 封育对宁夏荒漠草原土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(9): 1549-1554.
[8]	虞舟鲁, 邱乐丰, 林霖. 土地利用方式变化对农业土壤有机碳空间分布的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(5): 806-811.
[9]	季波, 李娜, 马璠, 蔡进军, 董立国, 许浩, 韩新生. 宁南典型退耕模式对土壤有机碳固存的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(3): 483-488.
[10]	蓝家程, 肖时珍, 林俊清, 沈艳. 土地利用方式对岩溶山地土壤轻组和重组有机碳的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1720-1725.
[11]	王连晓1，史正涛1，*，刘新有2，3，杨帆1. 西双版纳橡胶林土壤有机碳分布特征研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(7): 1200-.
[12]	邵泱峰1，梅洪飞1，潘忠潮1，刘欢2，王超琦2. 玉米秸秆还田对土壤有机碳、微生物功能多样性及甘蓝产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 838-.
[13]	罗书吉1，2，3，王钫2，3，陈文学1，王伟2，3，胡桂仙2，3，王强1，2，3，*. 离子色谱法测定茭白中总亚硫酸盐的应用研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 870-.
[14]	周锦连1，陈建明2，*，王来亮3，张珏锋2，马雅敏3，王斌4，钟海英2. 敌磺钠对单季茭白产量和效益的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(4): 624-.
[15]	陈贵1，赵国华2，张红梅1，沈亚强1，杨继锋3，冯四海4，陈小忠3，程旺大1，*. 沼液浇灌对茭白氮磷钾养分吸收利用特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 474-.