浙江农业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 225-238.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250315
刘和1,2(
), 寇枘1,2, 李君丽1,2, 彭实亮1,2, 连天境1,2, 麦力文1,2, 杨霞1,2, 王定美1,2, 邵明英3,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-04-17
出版日期:2026-02-25
发布日期:2026-03-24
作者简介:刘和,研究方向为发酵技术与微生物。E-mail:shadowshade@163.com
通讯作者:
*邵明英,E-mail: mingshao2013@aliyun.com
基金资助:
LIU He1,2(
), KOU Rui1,2, LI Junli1,2, PENG Shiliang1,2, LIAN Tianjing1,2, MAI Liwen1,2, YANG Xia1,2, WANG Dingmei1,2, SHAO Mingying3,*(
)
Received:2025-04-17
Online:2026-02-25
Published:2026-03-24
摘要:
针对黑水虻(Hermetia illucens)蛹壳几丁寡糖传统提取方法环境压力大的问题,本研究旨在建立一种环境友好的预处理与酶解工艺,实现将黑水虻蛹壳高效转化为几丁寡糖。以黑水虻蛹壳为原料,采用超微粉碎结合超声进行物理预处理;选用甲酸、草酸、柠檬酸等有机酸进行脱矿处理;随后使用角蛋白酶等不同几丁质水解酶进行酶解,并考察温度、酶添加量与金属离子辅助因子对酶解效果的影响;同时探究酸性纤维素酶替代几丁质酶的可行性。结果表明:柠檬酸对蛹壳中碳酸钙的脱除效果最佳;超声处理对后续降解效率无显著提升;几丁质酶的降解效率随温度与酶添加量的增加而提高;金属离子对不同几丁质水解酶的活性具有促进或抑制作用;酸性纤维素酶可有效降解蛹壳几丁质,其效果与几丁质酶相当。本研究建立了一种基于有机酸脱矿与酶法降解的黑水虻蛹壳几丁寡糖绿色提取工艺,证实酸性纤维素酶可作为几丁质酶的有效替代,为黑水虻蛹壳的高值化利用提供了可行的预处理策略与酶选用依据,有助于提升黑水虻生物资源利用率,推动农业有机废弃物的循环发展。
中图分类号:
刘和, 寇枘, 李君丽, 彭实亮, 连天境, 麦力文, 杨霞, 王定美, 邵明英. 黑水虻蛹壳几丁寡糖的高效提取技术[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2026, 38(2): 225-238.
LIU He, KOU Rui, LI Junli, PENG Shiliang, LIAN Tianjing, MAI Liwen, YANG Xia, WANG Dingmei, SHAO Mingying. Highly efficient extraction technology of chitooligosaccharides in the chrysalis shell of Hermetia illucens[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 225-238.
| 编号 Serial number | 葡萄糖体积/mL Volume of glucose/mL | 葡萄糖质量浓度/(mg·mL-1) Concentration of glucose/(mg·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 6 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
表1 还原糖标准曲线绘制
Table 1 Plotting of the reducing sugar standard curve
| 编号 Serial number | 葡萄糖体积/mL Volume of glucose/mL | 葡萄糖质量浓度/(mg·mL-1) Concentration of glucose/(mg·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 6 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 水平 Level | (A)几丁质酶 质量/g Chitinase mass/g | (C)超声时 间/min Ultrasonic time/min | (D)酶解时间/d Enzymatic hydrolysis time/d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.1 | 10 | 1 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 30 | 2 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 60 | 3 |
表2 正交试验的因素和水平
Table 2 Orthogonal experimental factors and levels
| 水平 Level | (A)几丁质酶 质量/g Chitinase mass/g | (C)超声时 间/min Ultrasonic time/min | (D)酶解时间/d Enzymatic hydrolysis time/d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.1 | 10 | 1 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 30 | 2 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 60 | 3 |
图1 黑水虻蛹壳(a)和超微粉碎后的黑水虻蛹壳粉(b)
Fig.1 Chrysalis shell of the black soldier fly(a) and chrysalis shell powder of the black soldier fly after ultramicro grinding(b)
图3 不同处理的还原糖含量 柱上无相同小写字母表示差异显著(p<0.05)。下同。
Fig.3 Reducing sugar content under different treatments Bars marked without the same lowercase letter indicated significant differences at p<0.05. The same as below.
图4 几丁质粉末的电镜图 a,超声前的几丁质粉末;b,超声后的几丁质粉末;c,酶解超声后的几丁质粉末。
Fig.4 Scanning electron microscopy image of chitin powder a, Chitin powder before ultrasound; b, Chitin powder after ultrasound; c, Chitin after enzymatic and ultrasound.
| 试验号 Test No. | A | C | D | 空列 Blank column | 降解率/% Degradation rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11.0 g |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5.0 i |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7.0 h |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 29.0 e |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 42.5 d |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 26.7 f |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 58.0 a |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 53.5 b |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 54.7 c |
表3 正交试验设计与结果
Table 3 Orthogonal experimental design and the results
| 试验号 Test No. | A | C | D | 空列 Blank column | 降解率/% Degradation rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11.0 g |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5.0 i |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7.0 h |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 29.0 e |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 42.5 d |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 26.7 f |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 58.0 a |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 53.5 b |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 54.7 c |
| 因素 Factor | k1/% | k2/% | k3/% | R | 最优水平 The optimal level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 7.67 | 32.72 | 55.40 | 47.73 | 3 |
| C | 32.67 | 33.67 | 29.46 | 4.20 | 2 |
| D | 30.39 | 29.57 | 35.83 | 6.27 | 3 |
表4 极差分析结果
Table 4 Results of range analysis
| 因素 Factor | k1/% | k2/% | k3/% | R | 最优水平 The optimal level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 7.67 | 32.72 | 55.40 | 47.73 | 3 |
| C | 32.67 | 33.67 | 29.46 | 4.20 | 2 |
| D | 30.39 | 29.57 | 35.83 | 6.27 | 3 |
图8 MnSO4催化几丁质酶条件下几丁质的降解率 不同数值间没有相同小写字母表示差异显著(p<0.05)。下同。
Fig.8 Degradation rate of chitin by chitinase in the presence of MnSO4 The values without the same lowercase letters indicate significant (p<0.05) difference. The same as below.
图12 草酸和柠檬酸脱矿后几丁质酶水解产生的还原糖含量
Fig.12 Reducing sugar content produced by chitinase hydrolysis following demineralization using oxalic acid or citric acid
图13 不同柠檬酸质量对酸性纤维素酶降解几丁质的还原糖含量的影响
Fig.13 Influence of different masses of citric acid on the reducing sugar content in chitin degradation by acidic cellulase
图16 降解产物的HPLC检测结果 a为样品检测结果,峰1为几丁三糖,峰2为富集的主要杂糖混合物;b为几丁二糖至七糖标准品检测结果。
Fig.16 HPLC analysis results of the degradation products a, Detection results of the sample, peak 1 is chitotriose, and peak 2 is the enriched main mixture of heterosaccharides; b, Detection results of chitobiose-chitoheptaose standards.
| [1] | 陶兴华. 易腐垃圾黑水虻转化工程中溶解性有机质光谱及微生物群落变化特征研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021. |
| TAO X H. Dynamic features on spectra of dissolved organic matter and microbial community during full-scale black soldier fly larvae bioconversion for biodegradable domestic waste[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021. | |
| [2] | LI Z Z, MAO R Y, TENG D, et al. Antibacterial and immunomodulatory activities of insect defensins-DLP2 and DLP4 against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 12124. |
| [3] | 侯雪阳, 李林, 许长峰, 等. 黑水虻特性及应用研究进展[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2022, 25(4): 56-60. |
| HOU X Y, LI L, XU C F, et al. Research progress on characteristics and application of black Hydrangea[J]. Special Economic Animals and Plants, 2022, 25(4): 56-60. | |
| [4] | RATCLIFFE N, AZAMBUJA P, MELLO C B. Recent advances in developing insect natural products as potential modern day medicines[J]. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014, 2014: 904958. |
| [5] | 强敬雯, 王晚晴, 唐曼玉, 等. 黑水虻转化厨余垃圾及产品应用相关研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(6): 25-32. |
| QIANG J W, WANG W Q, TANG M Y, et al. Research progress of kitchen waste transformation and product application of black soldier fly[J]. Feed Industry, 2023, 44(6): 25-32. | |
| [6] | 赵燕, 宋斌, 侯凤香, 等. 黑水虻幼虫粉替代豆粕对蛋鸡产蛋性能、血清指标及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59(3): 240-246. |
| ZHAO Y, SONG B, HOU F X, et al. Effects of black Hydrangea larva powder instead of soybean meal on laying performance, serum indexes and immune function of laying hens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59(3): 240-246. | |
| [7] | 孙星照. 虻粪二次堆肥过程中溶解性有机质波谱与微生物群落动态变化特征的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019. |
| SUN X Z. Dynamic features on spectrum of dissolved organic matter and microbial community in black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) vermicompost during secondary composting[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019. | |
| [8] | HENRY M, GASCO L, PICCOLO G, et al. Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: past and future[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 203: 1-22. |
| [9] | ISHAK S, KAMARI A. Biodiesel from black soldier fly larvae grown on restaurant kitchen waste[J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2019, 17(2): 1143-1150. |
| [10] | FURMAN D P, YOUNG R D, CATTS P E. Hermetia illucens(Linnaeus) as a factor in the natural control of Musca domestica Linnaeus[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1959, 52(5): 917-921. |
| [11] | 王成成, 贾昭炎, 刘洋, 等. 黑水虻转化有机生活废弃物相关研究进展[J]. 生物加工过程, 2021, 19(4): 432-439. |
| WANG C C, JIA Z Y, LIU Y, et al. Progress in transformation of organic domestic waste by black soldier fly[J]. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2021, 19(4): 432-439. | |
| [12] | 张建旭, 王旭旭, 孙一丹, 等. 电解水在小龙虾壳脱矿物质和蛋白质中的应用[J]. 中国食品学报, 2021, 21(1): 157-165. |
| ZHANG J X, WANG X X, SUN Y D, et al. The application of electrolyzed water in demineralization and deproteinization of crayfish shell[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 21(1): 157-165. | |
| [13] | 廖晶. 猴头菇加工余渣中几丁质的提取、改性及多尺度结构变化对凝胶性能的影响机制[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2021. |
| LIAO J. Extraction and modification of chitin from the Hericium erinaceus residue and the effect mechanism of multi-scale structural changes on gel properties[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2021. | |
| [14] | MERZENDORFER H. Insect chitin synthases: a review[J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology, 2006, 176(1): 1-15. |
| [15] | ARNOLD N D, BRÜCK W M, GARBE D, et al. Enzymatic modification of native chitin and conversion to specialty chemical products[J]. Marine Drugs, 2020, 18(2): 93. |
| [16] | DEGUCHI S, TSUJII K, HORIKOSHI K. In situ microscopic observation of chitin and fungal cells with chitinous cell walls in hydrothermal conditions[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 11907. |
| [17] | ZHOU Y, LI S Y, LI D D, et al. Enzymatic preparation of chitooligosaccharides and their anti-obesity application[J]. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2020, 84(7): 1460-1466. |
| [18] | MONREAL J, REESE E T. The chitinase of Serratia marcescens[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1969, 15(7): 689-696. |
| [19] | 姚婉生, 王雪, 侯海荣, 等. 几丁寡糖制备的研究进展[J]. 山东科学, 2006, 19(3): 27-31. |
| YAO W S, WANG X, HOU H R, et al. Advances in preparation of chitooligosaccharides[J]. Shandong Science, 2006, 19(3): 27-31. | |
| [20] | KHAN F I, RAHMAN S, QUEEN A, et al. Implications of molecular diversity of chitin and its derivatives[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 101(9): 3513-3536. |
| [21] | LOMBARD V, GOLACONDA RAMULU H, DRULA E, et al. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(Database issue): D490-D495. |
| [22] | FUNKHOUSER J D, ARONSON N N Jr. Chitinase family GH18: evolutionary insights from the genomic history of a diverse protein family[J]. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 7: 96. |
| [23] | DUTTA B, DESKA J, BANDOPADHYAY R, et al. In silico characterization of bacterial chitinase: illuminating its relationship with archaeal and eukaryotic cousins[J]. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 2021, 19(1): 19. |
| [24] | 陈龙, 董飞龙, 寇峰, 等. 春尺蠖几丁质酶AcinCht10基因的克隆及在逆境胁迫下的表达[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(9): 2068-2076. |
| CHEN L, DONG F L, KOU F, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of chitinase AcinCht10 from Apocheima cinerarius under stress[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(9): 2068-2076. | |
| [25] | 朱景一, 马振宇, 肖敏, 等. 壳聚糖与细菌细胞膜相互作用的分子动力学研究[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2023, 50(8): 1995-2005. |
| ZHU J Y, MA Z Y, XIAO M, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of the interaction between chitosan and bacterial membranes[J]. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2023, 50(8): 1995-2005. | |
| [26] | 朱先玉, 丛海花, 尹恒. 几丁质脱乙酰酶的特点及应用[J]. 渔业研究, 2019, 41(2): 167-174. |
| ZHU X Y, CONG H H, YIN H. Characteristics and application of chitin deacetylase[J]. Journal of Fisheries Research, 2019, 41(2): 167-174. | |
| [27] | 赵祥杰, 邝哲师, 叶明强, 等. 蚕蛹几丁质开发利用研究进展[J]. 蚕业科学, 2008, 34(3): 575-580. |
| ZHAO X J, KUANG Z S, YE M Q, et al. Advances on comprehensive utilization of chitin from silkworm Pupa[J]. Science of Sericulture, 2008, 34(3): 575-580. | |
| [28] | 武大引. 甲壳低聚糖的制备及性能测定[D]. 青岛: 青岛科技大学, 2017. |
| WU D Y. Preparation and properties of chitooligosaccharide[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University of Science & Technology, 2017. | |
| [29] | KUMAR A, KUMAR D, GEORGE N, et al. A process for complete biodegradation of shrimp waste by a novel marine isolate Paenibacillus sp. AD with simultaneous production of chitinase and chitin oligosaccharides[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 109: 263-272. |
| [30] | POSHINA D N, RAIK S V, SUKHOVA A A, et al. Nonspecific enzymatic hydrolysis of a highly ordered chitopolysaccharide substrate[J]. Carbohydrate Research, 2020, 498: 108191. |
| [31] | 杜敬河. 甲壳素酶产生菌的筛选及酶法制备甲壳低聚糖的研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016. |
| DU J H. Screening of chitinase producing bacteria and preparation of chitin oligosaccharides by enzymatic hydrolysis[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2016. | |
| [32] | 张群. 几丁质资源生物加工关键技术研究[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2022, 41(5): 112. |
| ZHANG Q. Study on key technologies of chitin resource bioprocessing[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2022, 41(5): 112. | |
| [33] | HORN S J, SØRBOTTEN A, SYNSTAD B, et al. Endo/exo mechanism and processivity of family 18 chitinases produced by Serratia marcescens[J]. The FEBS Journal, 2006, 273(3): 491-503. |
| [34] | VAAJE-KOLSTAD G, HORN S J, VAN AALTEN D M F, et al. The non-catalytic chitin-binding protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens is essential for chitin degradation[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2005, 280(31): 28492-28497. |
| [35] | REYNOLDS S E, SAMUELS R I. Physiology and biochemistry of insect moulting fluid[J]. Advances in Insect Physiology, 1996, 26: 157-232. |
| [36] | 李妍, 李家磊, 师献雪, 等. 昆虫几丁质酶功能研究、酶学性质及应用研究进展[J]. 科技视界, 2021(32): 69-72. |
| LI Y, LI J L, SHI X X, et al. Research progress on function, enzymatic properties and application of insect chitinase[J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2021(32): 69-72. | |
| [37] | LEVIN R M, KRIEGER N N, WINZLER R J. Glucmsumine and acetylglucosamine tolerance in man[J]. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 1961, 58: 927-932. |
| [38] | 时杰. 废弃虾蟹壳的资源化利用技术研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2011. |
| SHI J. Studies on shrimp and crab shell waste of the resource utilization[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2011. | |
| [39] | 肖宇, 于宏伟, 马爱进, 等. 球磨、超声和盐酸处理对几丁质的微观结构和酶促脱乙酰效率的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(7): 114-122. |
| XIAO Y, YU H W, MA A J, et al. Effects of ball milling, ultrosonic or hydrochloric acid treatment on the microstructure and enzymatic deacetylation efficiency of chitin[J]. Food Science, 2023, 44(7): 114-122. | |
| [40] | 侯福荣. 超声在酶促降解几丁质过程中的作用研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021. |
| HOU F R. Study on the role of ultrasound in the enzymatic degradation of chitin[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021. | |
| [41] | 刘洋, 肖宇, 马爱进, 等. 超微粉碎和高压均质联合处理对几丁质理化性质及微观结构的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(19): 102-109. |
| LIU Y, XIAO Y, MA A J, et al. Effect of combined treatment of ultra-micro grinding and high pressure homogenization on the physicochemical properties and microstructure of chitin[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(19): 102-109. | |
| [42] | LERTWATTANASERI T, ICHIKAWA N, MIZOGUCHI T, et al. Microwave technique for efficient deacetylation of chitin nanowhiskers to a chitosan nanoscaffold[J]. Carbohydrate Research, 2009, 344(3): 331-335. |
| [43] | AJAVAKOM A, SUPSVETSON S, SOMBOOT A, et al. Products from microwave and ultrasonic wave assisted acid hydrolysis of chitin[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2012, 90(1): 73-77. |
| [44] | ZHANG W C, ZHAO Y, XU L, et al. Superfine grinding induced amorphization and increased solubility of α-chitin[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 237: 116145. |
| [45] | ZHANG Q, DUAN L R, LI Y C. Positive effects and mechanism of ultrasound on chitin preparation from shrimp shells by co-fermentation[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2022, 88: 106066. |
| [46] | 宁为民. 一株几丁质降解菌的分离鉴定、酶基因克隆表达及对凡纳对虾生长和肠道菌群影响[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学, 2021. |
| NING W M. Isolation and identification of a chitin-degrading bacterium, cloning and expression of chitinase genes, and its effect on the growth and intestinal microbiota of Penaeus vannamei[D]. Zhanjiang: Guangdong Ocean University, 2021. | |
| [47] | OH S H, VO T S, NGO D H, et al. Prevention of H2O2-induced oxidative stress in murine microglial BV-2 cells by chitin-oligomers[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2016, 51(12): 2170-2175. |
| [48] | ALLAN G G, PEYRON M. Molecular weight manipulation of chitosan. I: kinetics of depolymerization by nitrous acid[J]. Carbohydrate Research, 1995, 277(2): 257-272. |
| [49] | CHANG K L, TAI M C, CHENG F H. Kinetics and products of the degradation of chitosan by hydrogen peroxide[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2001, 49(10): 4845-4851. |
| [50] | LI Z Y, LIU C Z, HONG S, et al. Recent advances in extraction and processing of chitin using deep eutectic solvents[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 446: 136953. |
| [51] | RAIMUNDO I, SILVA R, MEUNIER L, et al. Functional metagenomics reveals differential chitin degradation and utilization features across free-living and host-associated marine microbiomes[J]. Microbiome, 2021, 9(1): 43. |
| [52] | WANG X Y, ISBRANDT T, STRUBE M L, et al. Chitin degradation machinery and secondary metabolite profiles in the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas rubra S4059[J]. Marine Drugs, 2021, 19(2): 108. |
| [53] | UNGKULPASVICH U, BARAMEE S, UKE A, et al. Symbiotic chitin degradation by a novel anaerobic thermophilic bacterium Hydrogenispora sp. UUS1-1 and the bacterium Tepidanaerobacter sp. GT38[J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2021, 144: 109740. |
| [54] | 吴昊, 刘嘉荔, 杨静文, 等. 双酶协同降解胶体几丁质及其作用机制[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(6): 74-80. |
| WU H, LIU J L, YANG J W, et al. Synergistic enzymatic degradation of colloidal chitin and its mechanism[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(6): 74-80. | |
| [55] | EGGERT F M, GERMAIN J P. Rapid demineralization in acidic buffers[J]. Histochemistry, 1979, 59(3): 215-224. |
| [1] | 马园, 郝陆瑶, 张艳妮, 李倩楠, 王瑞. 厚垣普可尼亚菌原生质体的制备、再生与遗传体系构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 800-807. |
| [2] | 张妮, 陶文扬, 罗梦帆, 周万怡, 郑晓杰, 李彦坡, 金火喜, 杨颖. 酶解辅助提取对铁皮石斛多糖结构和菌群调节功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2099-2109. |
| [3] | 张晋, 吴晓丽, 田雨薇, 赵珂, 李欢欢, 达色, 次仁达杰, 陈黎洪, 唐宏刚. 超声波辅助酶解牦牛血粉提取氯化血红素的响应面工艺优化及品质表征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1357-1367. |
| [4] | 杨松花, 石贵阳, 王晶琴, 陈竹. 低磷胁迫下大豆根系分泌物对土壤中难溶性磷的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1396-1406. |
| [5] | 吴娇, 龚成宇, 陈超群, 陈红旭, 刘俊宏, 唐文静, 初元琦, 杨文龙, 张瑶, 龚荣高. 不同海拔黄果柑果实有机酸代谢的生态响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 853-861. |
| [6] | 刘晶, 胡晓, 杨贤庆, 陈胜军, 吴燕燕, 李来好, 戚勃, 邓建朝. 龙须菜蛋白质的提取及其酶解产物的抗氧化特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1061-1072. |
| [7] | 彭才望, 周婷, 孙松林, 谢烨林, 魏源. 基于堆积试验的黑水虻离散元仿真参数标定与分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 814-823. |
| [8] | 王同林, 叶红霞, 郑积荣, 李明. 番茄果实中主要风味物质研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1513-1522. |
| [9] | 张继磊, 周欢, 曾小红, 蔡燕萍, 丁玉庭, 刘书来. 蛋白酶解对鲣鱼肉乳化特性的改善[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 160-167. |
| [10] | 贡莎莎, 孟庆玲, 乔军, 钟文强, 黄运福, 张国武, 陈英, 才学鹏. 少孢节丛孢菌XJ-A1几丁质酶AO-483基因的克隆及生物学活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2): 222-228. |
| [11] | 代琳, 徐媛媛, 熊博, 黄胜佳, 孙国超, 汪志辉. 黄果柑果实抗坏血酸、谷胱甘肽和有机酸积累特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(8): 1341-1348. |
| [12] | 应泉盛, 何勇, 王迎儿, 曹婷婷, 古斌权, 王毓洪. 不同砧木嫁接对西瓜果实品质的影响机理研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(4): 590-596. |
| [13] | 唐宏刚,肖朝耿,叶梦迪,朱培培,陈黎洪*. 猪骨蛋白酶解液美拉德反应产物的抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(8): 1396-. |
| [14] | 柳林浩1,2,汪玉2,李国华1,方国东2,王磊3,4,*. 小分子有机酸对纳米零价铁还原脱氯4\|氯联苯的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 1451-. |
| [15] | 陈新峰1,李归浦1,钱锋1,黄强1,卢凯2,李亚军1,何光华1,黄焘2,*. 婴幼儿营养米粉酶法工艺优化 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5): 848-. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||