Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.04.13

›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 661-670.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.04.13

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations

REN Yun, LI Qiang, LI Zhexin, LIU Yiqing, TANG Jianmin^*

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Special Plant Industry in Chongqing, Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China

Received:2010-10-25 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-04-26

Abstract

Abstract: To study the differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue cultured gingers in different generations, and to determine the best promotion generation of tissue cultured ginger in production, tissue cultured original-original seeds (T₁), original seeds (T₂) and production seeds (T₃) were used as experimental materials to conduct a two-year field experiment in 2017-2018. The results showed that the growth characteristics of T₃ and T₂ were significantly better than that of T₁, which showed the plant height and stem diameter of T₃ and T₂ grew rapidly, and ensured the rapid growth of shoot in the early growth stage. After entering the rhizome expansion period, the growth of plant height and stem diameter of ginger slowed down, and tillers occurred rapidly. T₃ and T₂ could effectively control the occurrence of tillering, reduce the consumption of photosynthetic products by excessive tillering, and ensure the supply of photosynthetic products of rhizomes, thereby increased the rate of dry matter accumulation, prolonged the rapid growth period, and significantly increased their dry matter accumulation, laid a material foundation for high yield. After rhizome expansion period, the lower proportion in stem, leaf and root of T₃ and T₂, which promoted the transfer of photosynthetic products to rhizomes and further promoted the expansion of rhizomes, thus achieved high yield. Therefore, compared with the original-original seeds and original seeds, the production seeds of ginger had obvious yield advantages, which could effectively improve the economic benefits of ginger production. Comprehensive considering the yield differences and economic benefits, and seeds degeneration law of tissue cultured ginger, the tissue cultured ginger production seeds (T₃) could be used as the best promotion generation for production, which could realize its yield potential, improve economic benefits and effectively control the occurrence of diseases.

Key words: ginger, generation, tissue culture, matter accumulation and distribution, yield

CLC Number:

S632.5

REN Yun, LI Qiang, LI Zhexin, LIU Yiqing, TANG Jianmin. Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations[J]. , 2020, 32(4): 661-670.

References

[1] VARAKUMAR S, UMESH K V, SINGHAL R S.Enhanced extraction of oleoresin from ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizome powder using enzyme-assisted three phase partitioning[J]. Food Chemistry, 2017, 216: 27-36.
[2] KRÜGER S, BERGIN A, MORLOCK G E. Effect-directed analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale) and its food products, and quantification of bioactive compounds via high-performance thin-layer chromatography and mass spectrometry[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 243: 258-268.
[3] GAGAOUA M, HOGGAS N, HAFID K.Three phase partitioning of zingibain, a milk-clotting enzyme from Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizomes[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2015, 73: 245-252.
[4] 陈正明, 战博, 杨守正, 等. 农业综合开发支持优势特色产业发展研究: 以重庆市为例[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2016(12): 2-3.
CHEN Z M, ZHAN B, YANG S Z, et al.Research on comprehensive agricultural development supporting the development of dominant and characteristic industries: a case study of Chongqing[J]. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2016(12): 2-3.(in Chinese)
[5] 李秀, 徐坤, 巩彪. 生姜种质遗传多样性和亲缘关系的SRAP分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(4): 718-726.
LI X, XU K, GONG B.Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of ginger germplasm resources revealed by SRAPs[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(4): 718-726.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] ZHANG N, PAN R H, SHEN Y F, et al.Development of a novel bio-organic fertilizer for plant growth promotion and suppression of rhizome rot in ginger[J]. Biological Control, 2017, 114: 97-105.
[7] 刘贵猛, 谭树朋, 孙文献, 等. AMF和PGPR对生姜青枯病的影响[J]. 菌物研究, 2017, 15(1): 1-7.
LIU G M, TAN S P, SUN W X, et al.Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on bacterial wilt of ginger[J]. Journal of Fungal Research, 2017, 15(1): 1-7.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 王莹, 姜永平, 杨凯. 香沙芋新品种“泰芋一号”脱毒组培技术研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2015(24): 7-8.
WANG Y, JIANG Y P, YANG K.Study on detoxification and tissue culture technology of a new taro variety of “Taiyu 1”[J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2015(24): 7-8.(in Chinese)
[9] 宋伯符, 王胜武, 谢开云, 等. 我国甘薯脱毒研究的现状及展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(6): 43-48.
SONG B F, WANG S W, XIE K Y, et al.Status and prospects of sweetpotato viruses elimination in China[J]. Scientia Agricutura Sinica, 1997, 30(6): 43-48.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 葛胜娟. 生姜组培苗的培育及其生产应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(5): 75-78.
GE S J.Study on culture of tube-plantlets of ginger and its application in production[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(5): 75-78.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 梅丽, 李仁崑, 王立征, 等. 脱毒甘薯不同世代的生长特性、产量及品质表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(35): 36-45.
MEI L, LI R K, WANG L Z, et al.Growth characteristics, yield and quality performance of virus-free sweet potato with different generations[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(35): 36-45.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 王林生, 孔祥生, 李友军, 等. 徐薯18脱毒薯苗不同世代干物质积累与分配规律研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2000, 19(2): 99-101.
WANG L S, KONG X S, LI Y J, et al.The law of accumulation and distribution of dry matter on four generation virus free cutting of Xushu 18[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural, 2000, 19(2): 99-101.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 汤青林, 王小佳, 宋明, 等. 组培芋苗不同世代的差异研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(2): 66-69.
TANG Q L, WANG X J, SONG M, et al.Research of the discrepancy of tissue culture-derived taro in different generations[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 29(2): 66-69.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] DONG F, ZHANG D W, ZHANG C F, et al.Study on virus-free culture and rapid propagation technology of Xiangshu series varieties of sweet potato[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18(12): 2197-2201.
[15] 唐学军, 黄盛, 李晓晖, 等. 组培生姜高温条件下覆盖不同遮光率遮阳网试验初报[J]. 南方园艺, 2014, 25(6): 31-32.
TANG X J, HUANG S, LI X H, et al.Preliminary report on tissue culture ginger shading nets covered with different shading rates under high temperature conditions[J]. Southern Horticulture, 2014, 25(6): 31-32.(in Chinese)
[16] SHI P J, MEN X Y, SANDHU H S, et al.The “general” ontogenetic growth model is inapplicable to crop growth[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2013, 266: 1-9.
[17] MOUSTAKAS N K, NTZANIS H.Dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. Field Crops Research, 2005, 94(1): 1-13.
[18] WU H I, CHAKRABORTY A, LI B L, et al.Formulating variable carrying capacity by exploring a resource dynamics-based feedback mechanism underlying the population growth models[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2009, 6(4): 403-412.
[19] 卢会翔, 唐道彬, 吴正丹, 等. 甘薯产量、品质及农艺性状的基因型与环境效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(9): 1158-1168.
LU H X, TANG D B, WU Z D, et al.Genotypic variation and environmental effects on yield, quality and agronomic traits of sweet potato[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(9): 1158-1168.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 李秀, 徐坤, 巩彪, 等. 生姜农艺性状与产量形成关系的多重分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2431-2437.
LI X, XU K, GONG B, et al.Multiple analysis of relationship of agronomic traits and yield formation in ginger[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2431-2437.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 刘子学. 不同世代脱毒马铃薯光合特性研究[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2011, 25(4): 206-209.
LIU Z X.Photosynthetic characters of different generations of virus-free potato[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2011, 25(4): 206-209.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 刘志超, 胡万群, 刘道敏, 等. 脱毒马铃薯不同世代种植比较[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2006, 12(8): 85.
LIU Z C, HU W Q, LIU D M, et al.Comparison of planting virus-free potatoes in different generations[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 12(8): 85.(in Chinese)
[23] 孟令文, 孙恩玉, 于晓莹. 脱毒马铃薯不同世代生长特性及产量的研究[J]. 杂粮作物, 2003, 23(6): 348-349.
MENG L W, SUN E Y, YU X Y.Studies on growth character and yield of different virus-free potato generation[J]. Rain Fed Crops, 2003, 23(6): 348-349.(in Chinese)

Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Jinwu, YU Jihua, LYU Jian, FENG Zhi, YANG Haixing, CHE Xusheng, QIN Qijie, ZHANG Yang, JIN Ning. Effects of different mulching methods on yield, quality and soil nutrients of open-air loose-curd cauliflower on plateau in summer [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[2]	ZHENG Xusong, ZHONG Liequan, WANG Huifu, CHEN Fangjing, CHENG Liping, XU Qiqiang, LI Yang, ZHONG Xuhua, LYU Zhongxian. Demonstration on rice pests control by fertilizer regulation technique in different geographic rice growing areas of Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1656-1664.
[3]	ZHANG Tongshuai, YAN Lijuan, LI Guang, CHEN Guopeng, LUO Yongzhong. Effects of no tillage and straw mulching on soil nitrogen, water content and yield of spring wheat in dryland farming area [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[4]	HAN Lijie, DONG Weixin, ZHANG Yuechen. Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on canopy structure, yield and grain quality of wheat [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 953-962.
[5]	KE Yiqiang, GUO Penghui, MA Hongxin, YANG Xuhua, GAO Dandan, LIU Xiangjun, MA Zhongren, DING Gongtao. Rapid propagation system establishment of Lanzhou lily [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 1000-1008.
[6]	LI Le, TIAN Minjiao, GAO Yanming, LI Jianshe. Effect of selenium fertilizer on growth and mineral element accumulation of tomato in substrate culture [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 253-261.
[7]	HAN Tiqian, LIU Zhen, LIU Yuhui, ZHANG Xiaojing, WANG Li, ZHANG Junlian. Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen and organic manure substitution on potato root morphology and yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2111-2118.
[8]	BAO Lie, WANG Mantao, LIU Jiangchuan, WEN Bo, MING Yue. Estimation method of wheat yield based on convolution neural network [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2244-2252.
[9]	MA Ruifang, MA Jinchuan, MA Junwei, ZHOU Dayun, WANG Qiang, DING Chaohong. Growth dynamic and nutrient uptake law of common bean cultivar Liyun 2 [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 80-85.
[10]	TAO Jing, WU Qifeng, SHI Jiang, LI Songhao, GE Jiangfei, CHEN Junhui, XU Qiufang, LIANG Chenfei, QIN Hua. Impact of intercropping and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil fertility and corn yield in a newly cultivated mountain land [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 115-123.
[11]	PAN Junfeng, ZHONG Xuhua, HUANG Nongrong, LIU Yanzhuo, TIAN Ka, LIANG Kaiming, PENG Bilin, FU Youqiang, HU Xiangyu. Effects of different cultivation patterns on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rice in South China [J]. , 2019, 31(6): 857-868.
[12]	WANG Baojun, CHENG Wangda, CHEN Gui, SHEN Yaqiang, ZHANG Hongmei. Effect of straw returning and nitrogen reduction on soil nutrition, carbon pool and rice yield in rice field [J]. , 2019, 31(4): 624-630.
[13]	WU Xinghui, ZHANG Yu, LI Zhenzhou, ZHOU Liang, HUANG Xiaoyan, CHEN Qingfu, HUANG Kaifeng. Effect of different tillage methods on senescence and grain filling characteristics of tartary buckwheat [J]. , 2019, 31(12): 1963-1970.
[14]	MA Peng, YANG Zhiyuan, LI Yu, LIN Dan, SUN Yongjian, MA Jun. Effects of nitrogen reduction in wheat/rape season and nitrogen fertilizer management in rice season on crop yield and nitrogen uptake in crop rotation system [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1769-1778.
[15]	LI Hongqiao, DUAN Qiuyu, LIU Shishan, YANG Yunfei, LI Mengying, WU Yongcheng. Comparative study of yield and nitrogen efficiency between dwarf variety and normal variety in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1796-1802.