Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen and organic manure substitution on potato root morphology and yield

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.12.01

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 2111-2118.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.12.01

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen and organic manure substitution on potato root morphology and yield

HAN Tiqian¹(), LIU Zhen²^,³, LIU Yuhui², ZHANG Xiaojing⁴, WANG Li¹^,²^,^*(), ZHANG Junlian²^,³^,^*()

1. College of Life Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science/Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic and Germplasm Enhancement, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3. College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
4. Dingxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dingxi 743000, China

Received:2020-04-14 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2020-12-25
Contact: WANG Li,ZHANG Junlian

Abstract

Abstract:

Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of reduced chemical nitrogen and organic manure substitution on root growth in different developmental stages and yield of potato in the semi-arid area under film drip irrigation, in order to provide an efficient nitrogen management method in the cultivation of potato. Potato cultivar Qingshu9 was used in the test. The conventional N rate of 225 kg·hm^-2 was used as the control (CK), 70% chemical nitrogen fertilizer (RN) and 50% chemical nitrogen fertilizer (LN) were set up for reduced chemical nitrogen application treatments, and 80% chemical nitrogen fertilizer+20% organic nitrogen manure (LO) and 60% chemical nitrogen fertilizer+40% organic nitrogen manure (HO) were set up for organic manure substitution application treatments. The results showed that compared with CK, the number of tuber per plant, medium tuber rate and small tuber rate did not change significantly under RN treatment, however, the large tuber rate was decreased by 0.32 percent points and the yield were decreased by 10.93%. The number of tuber per plant were increased by 11.77%, the large tuber rate and medium tuber rate were increased by 0.43 and 6.47 percent points under HO treatment, respectively, and the yield was increased by 19.01%. The potato root under HO treatment had longer root length, larger projected root area, root volume, more tips and forks during the tuber initiation stage, and more tips during the tuber bulking stage compared with CK. The yield was significantly (P<0.01) positively related to the root length during the seedling, tuber bulking and starch formation stage, and the root surface area, the root volume, the number of tips and the number of forks during the tuber bulking stage. Therefore, 90 kg·hm^-2 organic nitrogen and 81 kg·hm^-2 chemical nitrogen as base fertilizers, and 54 kg·hm^-2 chemical nitrogen as topdressing in the tuber formation stage could improve the root growth effectively, promote the formation of effective tuber during the early growth stage, increase the number of tuber per plant and the expansion of tubers, and thus produce a higher yield of potato.

Key words: potato, reduced nitrogen, organic manure substitution, root characteristics, yield

CLC Number:

S532

HAN Tiqian, LIU Zhen, LIU Yuhui, ZHANG Xiaojing, WANG Li, ZHANG Junlian. Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen and organic manure substitution on potato root morphology and yield[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2111-2118.

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

[1]	王火焰, 周健民. 根区施肥: 提高肥料养分利用率和减少面源污染的关键和必需措施[J]. 土壤, 2013,45(5):785-790.
	WANG H Y, ZHOU J M. Root-zone fertilization: a key and necessary approach to improve fertilizer use efficiency and reduce non-point source pollution from the cropland[J]. Soils, 2013,45(5):785-790.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	冯跃华, 邹应斌, ROLAND J, 等. 不同耕作方式对杂交水稻根系特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006,39(4):693-701.
	FENG Y H, ZOU Y B, ROLAND J, et al. Effects of different tillage system on the root properties and the yield in hybrid rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006,39(4):693-701.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	WISHART J, GEORGE T S, BROWN L K, et al. Measuring variation in potato roots in both field and glasshouse: the search for useful yield predictors and a simple screen for root traits[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013,368(1/2):231-249.
[4]	孙磊, 王弘, 李明月, 等. 马铃薯生产的氮肥管理策略[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2013,27(5):314-318.
	SUN L, WANG H, LI M Y, et al. Nitrogen management strategies for potato production[J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2013,27(5):314-318.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	修凤英, 朱丽丽, 李井会. 不同施氮量对马铃薯氮素利用特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(3):36-38.
	XIU F Y, ZHU L L, LI J H. Characteristics of nitrogen utilization under different nitrogen strategies of potato[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2009(3):36-38.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	王亚艺, 李松龄, 张荣. 不同栽培模式对马铃薯产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015,27(10):1802-1806.
	WANG Y Y, LI S L, ZHANG R. Effect of different cropping patterns on potato yield and fertilizer use efficiency[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015,27(10):1802-1806.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	李燕山, 肖石江, 王晓瑞, 等. 氮肥用量对膜下滴灌冬马铃薯产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 土壤, 2020,52(1):25-32.
	LI Y S, XIAO S J, WANG X R, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield and economic benefit of winter potato with drip irrigation under mulch[J]. Soils, 2020,52(1):25-32.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	孙磊, 邰枫, 张亮, 等. 不同氮肥配施对马铃薯块茎形成及发育的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2018,49(6):32-39.
	SUN L, TAI F, ZHANG L, et al. Effect of different nitrogen fertilizer combinations on formation and development of potato tuber[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2018,49(6):32-39.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	贾立国, 陈玉珍, 苏亚拉其其格, 等. 灌溉马铃薯水分高效利用途径及其机理[J]. 土壤通报, 2018,49(1):226-231.
	JIA L G, CHEN Y Z, SUYALA Q, et al. Pathways and mechanism of increasing water use efficiency on irrigated potato[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2018,49(1):226-231.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	王泽义, 张恒嘉, 王玉才, 等. 马铃薯膜下滴灌水肥一体化研究进展[J]. 农业工程, 2018,8(10):86-89.
	WANG Z Y, ZHANG H J, WANG Y C, et al. Research status of water and fertilizer integration under mulch drip irrigation for potato[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 2018,8(10):86-89.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	RENS L R, ZOTARELLI L, CANTLIFFE D J, et al. Biomass accumulation, marketable yield, and quality of Atlantic potato in response to nitrogen[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2015,107(3):931-942. DOI URL
[12]	BUSSAN A J. The canon of potato science: 45. brown centre and hollow heart[J]. Potato Research, 2007,50(3):395-398. DOI URL
[13]	LAUER D A. Nitrogen uptake patterns of potatoes with high-frequency sprinkler-applied N fertilizer 1[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1985,77(2):193-197. DOI URL
[14]	LIEBIG M A, DORAN J W. Impact of organic production practices on soil quality indicators[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1999,28(5):1601-1609.
[15]	CHANG E H, CHUNG R S, TSAI Y H. Effect of different application rates of organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activity and microbial population[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2007,53(2):132-140. DOI URL
[16]	程万莉, 刘星, 高怡安, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对马铃薯根际土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2015,46(6):1459-1465.
	CHENG W L, LIU X, GAO Y A, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer partially replaced with organic fertilizer on functional diversity of microbial community in potato rhizosphere soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015,46(6):1459-1465.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	张绪成, 于显枫, 王红丽, 等. 半干旱区减氮增钾、有机肥替代对全膜覆盖垄沟种植马铃薯水肥利用和生物量积累的调控[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(5):852-864. DOI URL
	ZHANG X C, YU X F, WANG H L, et al. Regulations of reduced chemical nitrogen, potassium fertilizer application and organic manure substitution on potato water fertilizer utilization and biomass assimilation under whole field plastics mulching and ridge-furrow planting system on semi-arid Ar[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(5):852-864.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[18]	EL-SAYED S F, HASSAN H A, EL-MOGY M M. Impact of bio-and organic fertilizers on potato yield, quality and Tuber weight loss after harvest[J]. Potato Research, 2015,58(1):67-81. DOI URL
[19]	李艳, 陈义, 唐旭, 等. 长期不同施肥模式下南方水稻土有机碳的平衡特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018,30(12):2094-2101.
	LI Y, CHEN Y, TANG X, et al. Balance characteristics of soil organic carbon under different long-term fertilization models in rice soil in South China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018,30(12):2094-2101.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	吴愉萍, 孙辉, 孙鑫, 等. 基于绿色食品生产的氮肥减量施用技术对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 宁波大学学报(理工版), 2018,31(6):32-37.
	WU Y P, SUN H, SUN X, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on yield and quality of potato based on Green Food standard[J]. Journal of Ningbo University (Natural Science & Engineering Edition), 2018,31(6):32-37.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	谷浏涟, 孙磊, 石瑛, 等. 氮肥施用时期对马铃薯干物质积累转运及产量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2013,45(4):610-615.
	GU L L, SUN L, SHI Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen application time on dry matter accumulation and translocation and Tuber yield of potato[J]. Soils, 2013,45(4):610-615.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	商美新, 房增国, 梁斌, 等. 不同水氮处理对膜下滴灌马铃薯产量、品质及土壤硝态氮运移的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2019,34(6):118-125.
	SHANG M X, FANG Z G, LIANG B, et al. Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on potato yield, quality and soil nitrate nitrogen transport under drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019,34(6):118-125.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	岳超, 肖石江, 王怀义, 等. 氮肥用量对不同冬马铃薯品种产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2):119-125.
	YUE C, XIAO S J, WANG H Y, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of different winter potato varieties[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2019(2):119-125.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	王国兴, 徐福利, 王渭玲, 等. 氮磷钾及有机肥对马铃薯生长发育和干物质积累的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013,31(3):106-111.
	WANG G X, XU F L, WANG W L, et al. Effects of N-P-K and organic fertilizers on growth and dry matter accumulation of potato[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013,31(3):106-111.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	曹正鹏, 刘玉汇, 张小静, 等. 亏缺灌溉对马铃薯生长产量及水分利用的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(4):114-123.
	CAO Z P, LIU Y H, ZHANG X J, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation on growth, yield and water use of potato plants[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(4):114-123.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	陈杨, 秦永林, 于静, 等. 内蒙古灌溉马铃薯氮肥减施依据及措施[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(6):90-93.
	CHEN Y, QIN Y L, YU J, et al. Basis and measures for reducing nitrogen fertilizer on irrigated potato in Inner Mongolia[J]. Crops, 2019(6):90-93.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	段玉, 张君, 李焕春, 等. 马铃薯氮磷钾养分吸收规律及施肥肥效的研究[J]. 土壤, 2014,46(2):212-217.
	DUAN Y, ZHANG J, LI H C, et al. Fertilization effect and nutrition use efficiency of potato in Inner Mongolia[J]. Soils, 2014,46(2):212-217.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	黄继川, 彭智平, 于俊红, 等. 不同氮肥用量对冬种马铃薯产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2014,35(2):266-270.
	HUANG J C, PENG Z P, YU J H, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on yield, quality and nitrogen efficiency of winter potato[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2014,35(2):266-270.(in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	化学氮肥用量Application amount of chemical nitrogen fertilizer		有机氮用量 Application amount of organic nitrogen	折合有机肥用量 Equivalent of organic fertilizer
处理 Treatment	基施Base fertilizer	追施Top dressing	有机氮用量 Application amount of organic nitrogen	折合有机肥用量 Equivalent of organic fertilizer
常规施化学氮肥(CK) Routine application of chemical nitrogen fertilizer	135.0	90	0	0
70%化学氮肥(RN) 70% chemical nitrogen fertilizer	94.5	63	0	0
50%化学氮肥(LN) 50% chemical nitrogen fertilizer	67.5	45	0	0
80%化学氮+20%有机氮(LO) 80% chemical nitrogen and 20% organic nitrogen fertilizer	108.0	72	45	1000 (基施Base fertilizer)
60%化学氮+40%有机氮(HO) 60% chemical nitrogen and 40% organic nitrogen fertilizer	81.0	54	90	2000 (基施Base fertilizer)

处理 Treatment	化学氮肥用量Application amount of chemical nitrogen fertilizer		有机氮用量 Application amount of organic nitrogen	折合有机肥用量 Equivalent of organic fertilizer
处理 Treatment	基施Base fertilizer	追施Top dressing	有机氮用量 Application amount of organic nitrogen	折合有机肥用量 Equivalent of organic fertilizer
常规施化学氮肥(CK) Routine application of chemical nitrogen fertilizer	135.0	90	0	0
70%化学氮肥(RN) 70% chemical nitrogen fertilizer	94.5	63	0	0
50%化学氮肥(LN) 50% chemical nitrogen fertilizer	67.5	45	0	0
80%化学氮+20%有机氮(LO) 80% chemical nitrogen and 20% organic nitrogen fertilizer	108.0	72	45	1000 (基施Base fertilizer)
60%化学氮+40%有机氮(HO) 60% chemical nitrogen and 40% organic nitrogen fertilizer	81.0	54	90	2000 (基施Base fertilizer)

处理 Treatment	产量 Yield/(t·hm^-2)	单株结薯数 Number of tuber per plant	大薯率 Large tuber rate/%	中薯率 Medium tuber rate/%	小薯率 Small tuber rate/%
CK	43.56±0.23 b	14.70±0.14 b	2.26±0.04 b	57.39±0.87 b	40.35±0.83 b
RN	38.80±0.19 c	13.50±0.45 bc	1.94±0.06 c	54.02±0.79 bc	44.05±0.79 ab
LN	35.04±0.25 d	13.28±0.32 c	1.35±0.01 d	48.95±2.47 c	49.71±2.47 a
LO	41.69±0.08 bc	14.38±0.13 bc	2.13±0.10 bc	56.30±0.76 b	41.57±0.86 b
HO	51.84±1.49 a	16.43±0.22 a	2.69±0.03 a	63.86±1.09 a	33.45±1.08 c

处理 Treatment	产量 Yield/(t·hm^-2)	单株结薯数 Number of tuber per plant	大薯率 Large tuber rate/%	中薯率 Medium tuber rate/%	小薯率 Small tuber rate/%
CK	43.56±0.23 b	14.70±0.14 b	2.26±0.04 b	57.39±0.87 b	40.35±0.83 b
RN	38.80±0.19 c	13.50±0.45 bc	1.94±0.06 c	54.02±0.79 bc	44.05±0.79 ab
LN	35.04±0.25 d	13.28±0.32 c	1.35±0.01 d	48.95±2.47 c	49.71±2.47 a
LO	41.69±0.08 bc	14.38±0.13 bc	2.13±0.10 bc	56.30±0.76 b	41.57±0.86 b
HO	51.84±1.49 a	16.43±0.22 a	2.69±0.03 a	63.86±1.09 a	33.45±1.08 c

发育时期 Stage	根长 Root length	根投影面积 Root projected area	根表面积 Root surface area	根直径 Root diameter	根体积 Root volume	根尖数 Number of tips	根分叉数 Number of forks
苗期Seedling	0.59^**	0.34	0.34	0.10	0.40	0.47^*	0.36
块茎形成期Tuber initiation	0.14	0.12	0.07	0.30	0.24	0.19	0.01
块茎膨大期Tuber bulking	0.63^**	0.43	0.58^**	0.19	0.49^*	0.64^**	0.59^**
淀粉形成期Starch formation	0.54^*	0.18	0.35	0.06	0.03	0.25	0.30
成熟期Maturation	-0.43	-0.18	-0.12	0.27	0.13	-0.54^*	-0.40

Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen and organic manure substitution on potato root morphology and yield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XIE Ziyu, WANG Ke’er, ZHAO Wenliang, WEN Zuhui, CHEN Linrun, XU Lishan. Nutritional components and bioactivities of sweet potatoes with different flesh colors [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 183-192.
[2]	LIANG Liqin, YANG Rui, GAO Gang. Bioinformatics analysis of StUOXs gene family in potato [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1523-1532.
[3]	LI Jinwu, YU Jihua, LYU Jian, FENG Zhi, YANG Haixing, CHE Xusheng, QIN Qijie, ZHANG Yang, JIN Ning. Effects of different mulching methods on yield, quality and soil nutrients of open-air loose-curd cauliflower on plateau in summer [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[4]	ZHENG Xusong, ZHONG Liequan, WANG Huifu, CHEN Fangjing, CHENG Liping, XU Qiqiang, LI Yang, ZHONG Xuhua, LYU Zhongxian. Demonstration on rice pests control by fertilizer regulation technique in different geographic rice growing areas of Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1656-1664.
[5]	ZHANG Tongshuai, YAN Lijuan, LI Guang, CHEN Guopeng, LUO Yongzhong. Effects of no tillage and straw mulching on soil nitrogen, water content and yield of spring wheat in dryland farming area [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[6]	HAN Lijie, DONG Weixin, ZHANG Yuechen. Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on canopy structure, yield and grain quality of wheat [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 953-962.
[7]	XU Jianmin, SHI Hedi, SHI Peihua, ZHANG Zeyang, XU Zhigang. Comparison of fitting models of light response curve of potato under different light quality [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 753-761.
[8]	LIU Ziying, YUAN Bin, XIAO Huamei, WU Yongfei, LIU Xiaolin, HU Xiangfei. Screening, identification of Phytophthora infestans and its antagonistic bacterial strain [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 840-848.
[9]	REN Yun, LI Qiang, LI Zhexin, LIU Yiqing, TANG Jianmin. Differences in matter production characteristics and yield formation of tissue culture gingers in different generations [J]. , 2020, 32(4): 661-670.
[10]	WU Weicheng, DAI Jianbo, CAO Yan, XIA Qile, CHEN Jianbing, MENG Xianghe. Effects of physical modification on content, polysaccharide composition and structure of dietary fiber in sweet potato peels [J]. , 2020, 32(3): 490-498.
[11]	LI Le, TIAN Minjiao, GAO Yanming, LI Jianshe. Effect of selenium fertilizer on growth and mineral element accumulation of tomato in substrate culture [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 253-261.
[12]	BAO Lie, WANG Mantao, LIU Jiangchuan, WEN Bo, MING Yue. Estimation method of wheat yield based on convolution neural network [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2244-2252.
[13]	SHEN Shengfa, XIANG Chao, WU Liehong, LI Bing, LUO Zhigao. Determination and difference analysis of soluble sugar content in 11 sweetpotato germplasm resources [J]. , 2020, 32(11): 1934-1940.
[14]	MA Ruifang, MA Jinchuan, MA Junwei, ZHOU Dayun, WANG Qiang, DING Chaohong. Growth dynamic and nutrient uptake law of common bean cultivar Liyun 2 [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 80-85.
[15]	TAO Jing, WU Qifeng, SHI Jiang, LI Songhao, GE Jiangfei, CHEN Junhui, XU Qiufang, LIANG Chenfei, QIN Hua. Impact of intercropping and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil fertility and corn yield in a newly cultivated mountain land [J]. , 2020, 32(1): 115-123.