Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 52-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape

CUI Pengfei¹^,²(), WEI Lingzhu², CHENG Jianhui², XIANG Jiang², LI Mingshan², WU Jiang2^*(),

1. College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2. Institute of Horticulture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2020-07-09 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-25
Contact: WU Jiang2

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the effects of different rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape in hot and humid area of South China, and screen the rootstock-scion combinations with good comprehensive quality, 7 kinds of rootstock were grafted with Tiangong Cuiyu, and self-grafted Tiangong Cuiyu were set as the control. The growth, economic characteristics and fruit quality of the plants were investigated and measured, the differences of the rootstock-scion combinations were analyzed, and the fruit quality of grape rootstock-scion combination was evaluated comprehensively by principal component analysis. The results showed that the flowering period of grafted plants with the rootstock of SO4, 5BB and Dogridge were earlier than that of the self-grafted plants. All 7 kinds of rootstocks could improve the fruiting rate. The yield per plant of grafted plants of SO4, 5BB and Macadams were higher than that of self-grafted plants, increasing by 1.9%, 2.4% and 10.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the thickness ratio of grafted plants of 5BB, Dogridge, Kangzhen No. 5, 101-14 and Macadams. The rootstocks of SO4, 5BB and Macadams could all improve the quality of grafted plants. The fruit hardness of grafted plants with 5BB was 4.07 N on average, which was 60.9% higher than that of self-grafted plants. The total sugar content of grafted plants with SO4, 5BB and Macadams was higher than that of self-grafted plants. The sucrose content of grafted plants with 5BB was higher than that of self-grafted plants, with an average of 7.97 mg·g^-1, which was 33.05% higher than that of self-grafted plants. According to the principal component analysis, 5BB was the best rootstock suitable for Tiangong Cuiyu grape.

Key words: grape, Tiangong Cuiyu, rootstock, quality, principal component analysis

CLC Number:

S663.1

CUI Pengfei, WEI Lingzhu, CHENG Jianhui, XIANG Jiang, LI Mingshan, WU Jiang2, . Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 52-61.

Figures/Tables 11

References 27

[1]	邓建平, 肖君泽. 砧木对葡萄生长与抗病性的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2005,34(4):50-52.
	DENG J P, XIAO J Z. Effect of rootstock on the growth and disease resistance of grape[J]. South China Fruits, 2005,34(4):50-52.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	刘勇翔, 郭金丽, 李连国. 葡萄砧木抗逆性研究概况[J]. 北方农业学报, 2017,45(2):105-108.
	LIU Y X, GUO J L, LI L G. Review of stress tolerance of grape rootstock[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017,45(2):105-108.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	李超, 白世践, 赵荣华, 等. 葡萄砧木及其应用的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2016,6(5):53-59.
	LI C, BAI S J, ZHAO R H, et al. Progresses in research and application of grapevine rootstocks[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2016,6(5):53-59.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	陈湘云. 不同砧木对鲜食葡萄生物学性状影响的研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2010.
	CHEN X Y. Study on the effects of grape rootstocks on different biological properties[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2010.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	魏灵珠, 程建徽, 李琳, 等. 两种多抗性砧木对大紫王葡萄生长与果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2013,25(1):64-67.
	WEI L Z, CHENG J H, LI L, et al. Effects of two multi-resistance rootstocks on growth and berry quality of Daziwang grapevine[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2013,25(1):64-67.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	房玉林, 孙伟, 张振文, 等. 葡萄砧木的研究和利用概况[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2010(7):74-80.
	FANG Y L, SUN W, ZHANG Z W, et al. Research and utilization situation on grape rootstocks[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2010(7):74-80.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	曹玥华, 魏灵珠, 沈碧薇, 等. 砧木对新郁葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019,31(6):908-914.
	CAO Y H, WEI L Z, SHEN B W, et al. Effects of rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Xinyu grape[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019,31(6):908-914.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	程建徽, 魏灵珠, 向江, 等. 鲜食葡萄新品种‘天工翠玉’的选育[J]. 果树学报, 2020,37(6):945-947.
	CHENG J H, WEI L Z, XIANG J, et al. A new table grape cultivar ‘Tiangong Cuiyu’[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020,37(6):945-947.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	刘崇怀, 沈育杰, 陈俊, 等. 葡萄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[10]	孔庆山, 王丽雪. 中国葡萄志[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004.
[11]	SINGLETON V L, ROSSI J A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1965,16(3):144-158.
[12]	KOMATSU A, TAKANOKURA Y, MORIGUCHI T, et al. Differential expression of three sucrose-phosphate synthase isoforms during sucrose accumulation in citrus fruits (Citrus unshiu Marc.)[J]. Plant Science, 1999,140(2):169-178.
[13]	READ P E, GU S J. A century of American viticulture[J]. HortScience, 2003,38(5):943-951. DOI URL
[14]	刘诗佳. 葡萄果实糖酸含量及硬度遗传趋势分析[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018.
	LIU S J. Inherited tendency analysis of sugar and acid content and hardness for grape berry[D]. Shengyang: Shengyang Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	LI X J, LI S Y, LIN J X. Effect of GA₃ spraying on lignin and auxin contents and the correlated enzyme activities in bayberry (Myrica rubra Bieb.) during flower-bud induction[J]. Plant Science, 2003,164(4):549-556.
[16]	周先艳, 朱春华, 李进学, 等. 果实有机酸代谢研究进展[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015,44(1):120-125.
	ZHOU X Y, ZHU C H, LI J X, et al. Research progress on fruit organic acid metabolism[J]. South China Fruits, 2015,44(1):120-125.(in Chinese)
[17]	梅军霞, 郑婷, 程建徽, 等. 7种砧木对红玛斯卡特葡萄生长与果实品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41(23):9548-9550,9559.
	MEI J X, ZHENG T, CHENG J H, et al. Effects of seven kinds of rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of ‘Red Muscat’ grape[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013,41(23):9548-9550,9559. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	蒋爱丽, 李世诚, 杨天仪, 等. 不同砧木对藤稔葡萄生长与果实品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2005,21(3):73-75.
	JIANG A L, LI S C, YANG T Y, et al. The effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry of fujiminori grapevines[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2005,21(3):73-75.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	李超, 白世践, 耿新丽, 等. 不同砧木对‘赤霞珠’葡萄生长发育的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2016,33(10):1241-1250.
	LI C, BAI S J, GENG X L, et al. Effects of rootstocks on growth and development of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016,33(10):1241-1250.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	李敏敏, 袁军伟, 刘长江, 等. 砧木对河北昌黎产区赤霞珠葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(1):59-63.
	LI M M, YUAN J W, LIU C J, et al. Effects of rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine in Changli zone, Hebei Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(1):59-63.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	林玲, 张瑛, 时晓芳, 等. 砧木对夏黑葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 南方园艺, 2017,28(4) : 11-13.
	LIN L, ZHANG Y, SHI X F, et al. Effects of rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Summer Black grape[J]. Southern Horticulture, 2017,28(4):11-13.(in Chinese)
[22]	周军永, 陆丽娟, 孙其宝, 等. 不同砧木对“醉金香”葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2015,42(1):130-133.
	ZHOU J Y, LU L J, SUN Q B, et al. Effects of different root stocks on the growth and fruit quality of ‘Zuijinxiang’ grape[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2015,42(1):130-133.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	魏灵珠, 程建徽, 李琳, 等. SO4和贝达砧木对鄞红葡萄生长与果实品质的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2012(4):23-25.
	WEI L Z, CHENG J H, LI L, et al. Effects of SO4 and Beta rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of Yinhong grapevine[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2012(4):23-25.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	沈碧薇, 魏灵珠, 崔鹏飞, 等. 不同砧木对‘瑞都红玉’葡萄生长结果与果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020,37(3):350-361.
	SHEN B W, WEI L Z, CUI P F, et al. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry quality in ‘Ruidu Hongyu’ grapevines[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020,37(3):350-361.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	钟海霞, 张付春, 周晓明, 等. 不同砧木对无核葡萄果实糖分积累的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018,55(6):1002-1010.
	ZHONG H X, ZHANG F C, ZHOU X M, et al. Effects of different rootstocks on the accumulation of sugar on crimson seedless grapes[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018,55(6):1002-1010.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	简小楠. 不同砧木对阳光玫瑰葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2017.
	JIAN X N. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of ‘Shine-Muscat’ grape[D]. Jinhua, China: Zhejiang Normal University, 2017.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	沈碧薇, 项帅, 郑婷, 等. 不同砧木对‘天工翡翠’葡萄生长结果和果实品质的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2019(5):39-46.
	SHEN B W, XIANG S, ZHENG T, et al. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of ‘Tiangong Feicui’ grapevine[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2019(5):39-46.(in Chinese with English abstract)

砧木 Rootstock	遗传来源 Genetic origin	品种特性 Varietal characteristic
SO4	V. riparia × V. berlandieri	耐湿性强,不抗旱,抗石灰质土壤,抗根瘤蚜弱,抗根癌病,抗根结线虫 Strong moisture resistance, drought sensitivity, limestone soil resistance, weak resistance to rhizoma aphid, root cancer resistance, root knot nematode resistance
5BB	V. berlandieri	抗根瘤蚜、抗线虫,耐石灰土,适合潮湿、黏性土壤,生根性好 Rhizoma aphid resistance, nematode resistance, lime soil tolerance, suitable for wet, cohesive soil, good rooting
Dogridge	V. champini	抗干旱,耐石灰质土壤,抗根结线虫,较抗根瘤蚜,扦插难生根 Drought resistance, calcareous soil tolerance, root-knot nematode resistance, phylloxera resistance, cutting difficult to root
抗砧5号 Kangzhen No.5	V. riparia× V. labrusca	极耐盐碱(0.7%NaCl和18%饱和石灰水),高抗葡萄根瘤蚜,高抗根结线虫,适应性广 Extremely saline-alkali resistance (0.7%NaCl and 18% saturated lime water), highly resistant to grape phylloxera, highly resistant to root-knot nematodes, highly adaptability
Riparia Gloire	V. riparia	矮化砧,树势强,生长量大,嫁接亲和性好,易小脚,抗根瘤蚜和真菌病害。喜新鲜,潮湿的土壤 Dwarfing rootstock, strong tree vigor, good growth, good grafting affinity, easy to small feet, resistant to phylloxera and fungal diseases, prefers fresh, moist soil
101-14	V. riparia× V. rupestris	矮化,早熟,嫁接后小脚不明显,耐涝性强,抗线虫 Dwarfism, early maturity, small feet not obvious after grafting, strong waterlogging resistance, nematode resistance
Macadams	V. riparia	根系抗寒性强,嫁接亲和性强,高抗真菌病害,高抗根瘤蚜,耐高温耐潮湿 The root system has strong cold resistance, strong grafting affinity, high resistance to fungal diseases, high resistance to phylloxera, high resistance to high temperature and humidity

砧木 Rootstock	遗传来源 Genetic origin	品种特性 Varietal characteristic
SO4	V. riparia × V. berlandieri	耐湿性强,不抗旱,抗石灰质土壤,抗根瘤蚜弱,抗根癌病,抗根结线虫 Strong moisture resistance, drought sensitivity, limestone soil resistance, weak resistance to rhizoma aphid, root cancer resistance, root knot nematode resistance
5BB	V. berlandieri	抗根瘤蚜、抗线虫,耐石灰土,适合潮湿、黏性土壤,生根性好 Rhizoma aphid resistance, nematode resistance, lime soil tolerance, suitable for wet, cohesive soil, good rooting
Dogridge	V. champini	抗干旱,耐石灰质土壤,抗根结线虫,较抗根瘤蚜,扦插难生根 Drought resistance, calcareous soil tolerance, root-knot nematode resistance, phylloxera resistance, cutting difficult to root
抗砧5号 Kangzhen No.5	V. riparia× V. labrusca	极耐盐碱(0.7%NaCl和18%饱和石灰水),高抗葡萄根瘤蚜,高抗根结线虫,适应性广 Extremely saline-alkali resistance (0.7%NaCl and 18% saturated lime water), highly resistant to grape phylloxera, highly resistant to root-knot nematodes, highly adaptability
Riparia Gloire	V. riparia	矮化砧,树势强,生长量大,嫁接亲和性好,易小脚,抗根瘤蚜和真菌病害。喜新鲜,潮湿的土壤 Dwarfing rootstock, strong tree vigor, good growth, good grafting affinity, easy to small feet, resistant to phylloxera and fungal diseases, prefers fresh, moist soil
101-14	V. riparia× V. rupestris	矮化,早熟,嫁接后小脚不明显,耐涝性强,抗线虫 Dwarfism, early maturity, small feet not obvious after grafting, strong waterlogging resistance, nematode resistance
Macadams	V. riparia	根系抗寒性强,嫁接亲和性强,高抗真菌病害,高抗根瘤蚜,耐高温耐潮湿 The root system has strong cold resistance, strong grafting affinity, high resistance to fungal diseases, high resistance to phylloxera, high resistance to high temperature and humidity

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	时期(月-日)Date
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	萌芽Sporut	初花Initial flower	盛花Profuse flower	转熟Veraison	成熟Mature
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	03-17	04-22	04-25	06-26	08-02
TC/SO4	03-15	04-22	04-24	06-21	07-30
TC/5BB	03-16	04-22	04-24	06-24	07-31
TC/Dogridge	03-15	04-22	04-24	06-26	08-02
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	03-16	04-23	04-25	06-26	08-03
TC/Riparia Gloire	03-18	04-24	04-25	06-27	08-04
TC/101-14	03-18	04-23	04-25	06-26	08-05
TC/Macadams	03-16	04-24	04-25	06-23	08-01

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	时期(月-日)Date
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	萌芽Sporut	初花Initial flower	盛花Profuse flower	转熟Veraison	成熟Mature
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	03-17	04-22	04-25	06-26	08-02
TC/SO4	03-15	04-22	04-24	06-21	07-30
TC/5BB	03-16	04-22	04-24	06-24	07-31
TC/Dogridge	03-15	04-22	04-24	06-26	08-02
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	03-16	04-23	04-25	06-26	08-03
TC/Riparia Gloire	03-18	04-24	04-25	06-27	08-04
TC/101-14	03-18	04-23	04-25	06-26	08-05
TC/Macadams	03-16	04-24	04-25	06-23	08-01

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	新梢节间粗 Shootinternode thickness/mm	新梢节间长 Shoot internode length/cm	主干茎粗 Main stem thickness/mm	接穗茎粗 Scion thickness/mm	穗砧粗度比 Ratio of main stem to scion thickness
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	7.83±1.58 b	10.80±1.28 a	29.72±2.60 bc	29.72±2.60 cd	1.00±0 bc
TC/SO4	7.50±0.77 b	12.50±0.50 a	29.70±1.40 bc	40.83±2.95 ab	1.38±0.05 a
TC/5BB	7.52±0.28 b	9.67±0.42 a	37.15±2.45 a	45.62±3.17 a	1.23±0.11 ab
TC/Dogridge	8.19±1.61 ab	9.77±2.18 a	36.41±0.38 ab	36.22±3.43 bc	1.00±0.08 bc
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	7.53±0.91 b	13.00±1.32 a	29.06±8.74 c	21.36±4.03 e	0.78±0.23 c
TC/Riparia Gloire	9.57±0.80 ab	12.00±1.80 a	21.05±2.37 d	28.40±3.87 cde	1.35±0.05 a
TC/101-14	9.32±0.63 ab	11.00±0.87 a	28.43±2.17 c	29.06±4.53 cde	1.02±0.15 bc
TC/Macadams	10.03±1.23 a	12.17±3.51 a	20.66±4.40 d	23.80±7.93 de	1.13±0.21 ab

Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	萌芽率 Germination rate/%	结果枝率 Percentage of fruiting branches/%	单株产量 Yield per plant/kg
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	70.42	68.00	4.21
TC/SO4	76.92	86.67	4.29
TC/5BB	67.50	85.19	4.31
TC/Dogridge	73.85	87.50	3.73
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	64.56	88.24	3.66
TC/Riparia Gloire	76.60	77.78	3.99
TC/101-14	78.05	68.75	3.87
TC/Macadams	69.57	81.25	4.63

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	穗重 Cluster weight/g	果穗长 Cluster length/cm	果穗宽 Cluster width/cm	粒重 Berry weight/g	果粒纵径 Vertical diameter/cm	果粒横径 Transverse diameter/cm	果形指数 Fruit shape index
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	300.36±1.70 a	17.00±1.50 ab	11.00±0.50 a	7.00±0.33 a	2.64±0.01 abc	2.25±0.03 a	1.18±0.02 a
TC/SO4	306.35±10.06 ab	15.00±1.32 bc	9.00±0.50 b	6.29±0.53 b	2.48±0.07 bc	2.08±0.06 b	1.19±0.01 a
TC/5BB	307.99±9.78 ab	15.83±1.26 ab	9.17±0.76 b	6.78±0.58 ab	2.47±0.13 c	2.18±0.07 ab	1.13±0.03 bc
TC/Dogridge	266.47±96.08 b	15.33±1.26 bc	9.37±1.00 b	6.73±1.31 ab	2.57±0.16 abc	2.20±0.16 ab	1.17±0.02 ab
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	261.74±9.65 b	13.33±0.29 c	9.20±0.80 b	7.41±0.25 ab	2.56±0.04 abc	2.29±0.06 a	1.12±0.03 c
TC/Riparia Gloire	284.79±56.53 b	16.33±0.29 ab	8.90±0.56 b	7.73±0.32 a	2.69±0.07 a	2.23±0.02 a	1.20±0.02 a
TC/101-14	276.66±65.78 b	13.70±1.21 c	9.47±0.50 b	7.12±0.10 ab	2.61±0.06 abc	2.21±0.03 ab	1.18±0.03 a
TC/Macadams	330.47±51.13 ab	17.67±0.76 a	9.00±0.50 b	7.41±0.37 ab	2.65±0.10 ab	2.20±0.05 ab	1.20±0.02 a

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	硬度 Hardness/N	总糖 Total sugar/ (mg·g^-1)	可溶性固形物 Soluble solids/%	可滴定酸含量 Titratable acid content/%	固酸比 Ratio of soluble solid to acid	总酚 Total phenol/ (mg·g^-1)
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	2.53±1.13 b	159.23±10.78 abc	19.40±0.44 b	0.56±0.07 bc	34.76±3.58 bcd	0.55±0.04 cd
TC/SO4	1.53±0.82 b	167.77±8.32 ab	20.40±0.44 a	0.42±0.02 d	48.77±3.35 a	0.84±0.02 a
TC/5BB	4.07±1.06 a	160.06±9.33 abc	19.37±0.25 b	0.57±0.02 bc	33.79±1.14 cde	0.47±0.01 f
TC/Dogridge	2.17±1.40 b	141.48±6.04 c	17.73±0.57 c	0.60±0.04 ab	29.84±2.17 e	0.60±0.02 b
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	1.58±0.34 b	153.00±21.85 abc	19.33±0.75 b	0.51±0.02 c	37.83±2.58 bc	0.52±0.02 de
TC/Riparia Gloire	1.74±0.73 b	146.86±10.44 bc	19.5±0.00 b	0.64±0.02 a	30.49±0.89 de	0.50±0.02 ef
TC/101-14	2.14±1.21 b	154.00±16.38 abc	20.20±0.40 ab	0.52±0.03 c	39.10±2.88 b	0.57±0.01 bc
TC/Macadams	2.51±0.39 b	172.00±6.40 a	19.77±0.40 ab	0.53±0.03 c	37.43±2.52 bc	0.57±0.02 bc

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	蔗糖 Sucrose/(mg·g^-1)	葡萄糖 Glucose/(mg·g^-1)	果糖 Fructose/(mg·g^-1)	果糖/葡萄糖 Fructose/Glucose
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	5.99±0.35 bcd	77.92±5.28 abc	75.32±5.19 abc	0.97±0.01 cd
TC/SO4	5.41±0.31 d	82.18±3.95 ab	80.18±4.05 ab	0.98±0.01 b
TC/5BB	7.97±0.40 a	77.46±4.50 abc	74.63±4.44 abc	0.96±0.00 d
TC/Dogridge	5.85±0.31 cd	68.14±2.93 c	67.49±2.84 c	0.99±0.01 a
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	6.29±0.90 bcd	74.47±10.58 abc	72.24±10.38 abc	0.97±0.00 bc
TC/Riparia Gloire	6.01±0.38 bcd	71.78±5.01 bc	69.07±5.05 bc	0.96±0.00 d
TC/101-14	6.86±0.74 b	75.41±7.92 abc	71.73±7.71 abc	0.95±0.00 e
TC/Macadams	6.66±0.21 bc	83.96±3.08 a	81.38±3.11 a	0.97±0.00 bc

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	草酸 Oxalic acid/ (mg·g^-1)	酒石酸 Tartaric acid/ (mg·g^-1)	苹果酸 Malic acid/ (mg·g^-1)	柠檬酸 Citric acid/ (mg·g^-1)	β
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	0.09±0.03 bc	2.03±0.25 a	2.45±0.13 bc	6.36±0.51 a	0.83±0.14 bc
TC/SO4	0.07±0.01 c	1.68±0.20 a	1.22±0.08 d	1.37±0.21 e	1.37±0.16 a
TC/5BB	0.11±0.04 b	2.00±0.97 a	2.64±0.09 ab	4.99±0.76 b	0.77±0.40 bc
TC/Dogridge	0.08±0.00 bc	1.92±0.33 a	2.65±0.11 ab	4.19±0.18 bc	0.72±0.12 bc
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	0.08±0.01 bc	1.83±0.27 a	2.87±0.41 a	4.32±0.71 bc	0.65±0.13 bc
TC/Riparia Gloire	0.09±0.01 bc	1.51±0.05 a	2.99±0.27 a	4.58±0.70 bc	0.51±0.04 c
TC/101-14	0.20±0.02 a	1.90±0.04 a	2.19±0.30 c	2.99±0.38 d	0.88±0.14 b
TC/Macadams	0.11±0.02 b	1.60±0.11 a	2.39±0.11 bc	3.91±0.25 c	0.67±0.03 bc

主成分编号 Principle component numbers	特征值 Eigenvalue	贡献率 Contribution ratio/%	累计贡献率 Accumulative contribution ratio/%
F1	9.311	31.037	31.037
F2	6.390	21.301	52.338
F3	4.344	14.478	66.817
F4	3.244	10.813	77.629
F5	3.128	10.427	88.056
F6	2.667	8.890	96.946

指标	成分1	成分2	成分3	成分4	成分5	成分6
Index	Component 1	Component 2	Component 3	Component 4	Component 5	Component 6
新梢节间粗Shoot internode thickness	-0.144	0.780	-0.044	-0.403	0.266	0.076
新梢节间长Shoot internode length	0.415	0.532	-0.303	-0.035	-0.607	0.191
主干茎粗Main stem thickness	-0.105	-0.946	0.063	0.171	0.117	-0.210
接穗茎粗Scion stem thickness	0.299	-0.727	0.196	-0.074	0.549	0.072
穗砧粗度比Ratio of main scion to stock thickness	0.485	0.094	0.078	-0.278	0.636	0.356
萌芽率Percentage of pullulation	0.372	0.277	-0.340	-0.210	0.659	-0.429
结果枝率Percentage of fruiting branches	0.190	-0.543	-0.436	-0.009	-0.213	0.648
单株产量Yield per plant	-0.426	-0.651	0.154	-0.510	-0.040	0.228
穗重Cluster weight	0.105	0.284	0.762	0.538	0.150	0.006
果穗长Cluster length	-0.065	0.406	0.480	0.321	0.477	0.514
果穗宽Cluster wide	-0.253	0.067	0.460	0.664	0.026	-0.515
粒重Berry weight	-0.622	0.691	0.185	0.145	-0.203	-0.012
果粒纵径Vertical diameter	-0.439	0.876	-0.080	0.086	0.131	-0.074
果粒横径Vertical diameter	-0.832	0.263	-0.024	0.117	-0.459	-0.117
果形指数Fruit shape index	0.349	0.718	-0.064	0.084	0.584	-0.033
硬度Hardness	-0.304	-0.442	0.750	-0.191	0.237	0.204
总糖Total sugar	0.658	0.195	0.627	-0.012	-0.226	0.261
可溶性固形物Soluble solids	0.626	0.376	0.355	-0.405	-0.237	-0.177
可滴定酸含量Titratable acid content	-0.859	0.125	-0.075	-0.033	0.448	0.181
固酸比Ratio of soluble solid to acid	0.921	-0.007	0.067	-0.054	-0.333	-0.174
总酚Total phenols	0.915	-0.060	-0.262	0.249	0.120	-0.115
蔗糖Sucrose	-0.358	-0.317	0.606	-0.604	-0.080	0.101
葡萄糖Glucose	0.671	0.246	0.615	-0.016	-0.230	0.221
果糖Fructose	0.709	0.193	0.550	0.088	-0.212	0.290
果糖/葡萄糖Fructose/Glucose	0.235	-0.290	-0.418	0.712	0.109	0.299
草酸Oxalic acid	-0.102	0.175	0.274	-0.633	0.048	-0.625
酒石酸Tartaric acid	-0.313	-0.630	0.402	0.278	-0.063	-0.502
苹果酸Malic acid	-0.954	0.082	-0.092	-0.079	-0.109	0.234
柠檬酸Citric acid	-0.816	0.049	0.409	0.362	0.007	0.094
β	0.891	-0.283	0.081	0.142	0.071	-0.295

砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	F₅	F₆	F	排名 Ranking
TC自根树Self-grafted TC	0.383	-0.087	0.415	-0.071	2.304	-0.319	0.365	2
TC/SO4	-2.147	-0.095	0.631	0.317	-0.390	-0.699	-0.664	8
TC/5BB	0.494	2.159	0.566	-0.576	-0.557	0.332	0.604	1
TC/Dogridge	-0.041	0.516	-1.692	0.149	0.104	-1.243	-0.231	6
TC/抗砧5号Kangzhen No.5	0.428	-1.191	-0.080	-1.985	-0.655	-0.261	-0.439	7
TC/Riparia Gloire	0.943	-0.530	-0.649	1.422	-0.754	0.113	0.171	4
TC/101-14	-0.710	-0.216	-0.712	-0.018	0.305	2.160	-0.148	5
TC/Macadams	0.649	-0.557	1.520	0.761	-0.357	-0.083	0.341	3

[1]	WEN Mingxia, ZHANG Shunchang, WU Shaohui, HU Lipeng, WANG Peng, HUANG Bei. Effect of protein hydrolysate-based amino-acid fertilizers on fruit quality of Hongmeiren citrus hybrid [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(3): 422-428.
[2]	CHEN Dan, TANG Cuifeng, DONG Chao, GAN Shuxian, LI Jun, A Xinxiang, ZHANG Feifei, YANG Yayun, NIU Saisai, DAI Luyuan. Grain starch quality characteristics of Yunnan soft rice landraces [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 203-214.
[3]	LI Tianzhu, SUN Yuwen, WANG Jitao, GAN Defang, HU Keling. Effects of different storage temperature on quality and lignin accumulation in postharvest oyster mushrooms [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 248-258.
[4]	ZHANG Faming, DING Feng, WANG Ping. Evaluation of high-quality agricultural development level in major grain producing areas in China and its spatial and temporal evolution [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 150-160.
[5]	DONG Yanmin, YAN Fengxian. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination of agricultural high-quality development in China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 170-182.
[6]	LIAO Chaomei, YOU Minfang, TAN Guanghui, LI Jiezhang, ZHANG Yiyu, QIN Yuanyu, LIU Ruoyu. Effect of variation of PRKCB gene intron 14 in Sansui ducks on eggshell quality [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1574-1580.
[7]	LI Jinwu, YU Jihua, LYU Jian, FENG Zhi, YANG Haixing, CHE Xusheng, QIN Qijie, ZHANG Yang, JIN Ning. Effects of different mulching methods on yield, quality and soil nutrients of open-air loose-curd cauliflower on plateau in summer [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[8]	GE Jintao, WANG Jiangying, ZHAO Wenjing, SHAO Xiaobin, ZHU Pengbo, TANG Xueyan, SUN Mingwei, LIU Xingman. Transcriptome analysis on development of aerial root in grape of Weike [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1645-1655.
[9]	YU Zonggang, JIANG Jun, YAO Yaling, GUO Ying, LI Chuang, YAN Haifeng. Correlation analysis of HSP70 gene polymorphism and semen quality in Xuefeng Black-bone chicken [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1378-1384.
[10]	WANG Tonglin, YE Hongxia, ZHENG Jirong, LI Ming. Research progress of main flavor compounds in tomato fruits [J]. , 2020, 32(8): 1513-1522.
[11]	GU Saiqi, WANG Suning, BAO Rongbin, HU Binchao, YANG Xiaoxia, ZHANG Jilei, CHEN Jingying, LIN Zhaoyong, DING Yuting, KE Zhigang. Effect of food improvers on quality characteristics of dried Engraulis japonicas [J]. , 2020, 32(7): 1263-1273.
[12]	HAN Lijie, DONG Weixin, ZHANG Yuechen. Effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on canopy structure, yield and grain quality of wheat [J]. , 2020, 32(6): 953-962.
[13]	XU Jianmin, SHI Hedi, SHI Peihua, ZHANG Zeyang, XU Zhigang. Comparison of fitting models of light response curve of potato under different light quality [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 753-761.
[14]	ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Ji, RONG Tao, OU Kewei, HUANG Guodi, SONG Hongxia. Analysis on genetic relationship of mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasms by CDDP markers [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 824-830.
[15]	HU Jian, HU Fengjun, ZHANG Hong, ZHU Ying. Optimization of wireless sensor network for water quality monitoring based on improved cuckoo search algorithm [J]. , 2020, 32(5): 897-903.