Effects of different shading rates on fruit quality and photosynthetic characteristics of sweet cherry

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221338

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2346-2353.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221338

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of different shading rates on fruit quality and photosynthetic characteristics of sweet cherry

TANG Wenjing¹(), GONG Ronggao¹^,^*(), CHU Yuanqi¹, CHEN Chaoqun¹, CHEN Hongxu¹, RAN Maosheng², ZHANG Yao¹, YANG Wenlong¹

1. College of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130,China
2. Wenchuan County Bureau of Science and Technology, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Wenchuan 623000, Sichuan, China

Received:2022-09-14 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-10-31

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the effects of different shading intensity on fruit quality and photosynthetic characteristics of sweet cherry, and to screen the optimal light conditions for the growth of sweet cherry, with Hongdeng as the material, the top of the tree was covered with sunshade net to simulate five treatments of full illumination (CK), shading rate 15% (A), shading rate 30% (B), shading rate 45% (C) and shading rate 60% (D) under different light intensities. To analyze the effects of different shading treatments on photosynthetic pigment content, net photosynthetic rate (P_n), transpiration rate (T_r), stomatal conductance (G_s), apparent quantum efficiency (AQY), light compensation point (LCP), dark respiration rate (R_d), light saturation point (LSP) and fruit quality of sweet cherry leaves. The results showed as follows: The sugar-acid ratio of sweet cherry fruits in treatment A was significantly higher than that in other treatments. With the increase of shading rate, anthocyanin, antioxidant capacity and total phenol increased first and then decreased, and there was no significant difference between treatment A and CK. The total amount of chlorophyll and carotenoid content of sweet cherry leaves were D>C>B>A>CK and C>D>B>CK>A. With the increase of shading rate, net photosynthetic rate (P_n), transpiration rate (T_r), stomatal conductance (G_s), apparent quantum efficiency (AQY), light compensation point (LCP), dark respiration rate (R_d) and light saturation point (LSP) increased first and then decreased. The photosynthetic capacity of treatment A was the strongest, while the growth and development of treatment B, C and D were limited by the severe lack of light energy. With the increase of shading rate, the color parameters lightness (L), red green (a) and yellow blue (b) values of A and B treatments and CK treatments were not significantly different, while the color parameters of C and D treatments was significantly higher than that of the control. The color difference pattern was the same as the color. It indicates that light shading is beneficial to improve the commercial property, and the best shading degree is within 15%.

Key words: sweet cherry, quality, photosynthetic characteristic, shading rate

CLC Number:

S662.5

TANG Wenjing, GONG Ronggao, CHU Yuanqi, CHEN Chaoqun, CHEN Hongxu, RAN Maosheng, ZHANG Yao, YANG Wenlong. Effects of different shading rates on fruit quality and photosynthetic characteristics of sweet cherry[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(10): 2346-2353.

Figures/Tables 8

References 28

[1]	苍晶, 李唯. 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017.
[2]	ALERIC K M, KIRKMAN L K. Growth and photosynthetic responses of the federally endangered shrub, Lindera melissifolia(Lauraceae), to varied light environments[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2005, 92(4): 682-689.
[3]	石凯, 李泽, 张伟建, 等. 不同光照对油桐幼苗生长、光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(8): 35-42, 50.
	SHI K, LI Z, ZHANG W J, et al. Influence of different light intensity on the growth, diurnal change of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of tung tree seedling[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(8): 35-42, 50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	杜杰, 徐金光, 吕梦雯, 等. 夏季遮光减缓芍药叶片衰老的光合机制研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(5): 773-782.
	DU J, XU J G, LÜ M W, et al. Study on photosynthetic mechanism of summer shading slowing aging of herbaceous peony(Paeonia lactiflora) leaves[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2018, 54(5): 773-782. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张云, 夏国华, 马凯, 等. 遮阴对堇叶紫金牛光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(7): 1940-1948.
	ZHANG Y, XIA G H, MA K, et al. Effects of shade on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence of Ardisia violacea[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(7): 1940-1948. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	URBAN O, KOŠVANCOVÁ M, MAREK M V, et al. Induction of photosynthesis and importance of limitations during the induction phase in sun and shade leaves of five ecologically contrasting tree species from the temperate zone[J]. Tree Physiology, 2007, 27(8): 1207-1215.
[7]	胡文海, 张斯斯, 肖宜安, 等. 两种杜鹃花属植物对长期遮阴后全光照环境的生理响应及其光保护机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(11): 1093-1100.
	HU W H, ZHANG S S, XIAO Y A, et al. Physiological responses and photo-protective mechanisms of two Rhododendron plants to natural sunlight after long term shading[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(11): 1093-1100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	倪志婧, 马文平, 宋长冰, 等. 光照强度对“梅鹿辄”葡萄品质的影响[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 43(10): 1422-1425, 1434.
	NI Z J, MA W P, SONG C B, et al. Effects of light intensity on the quality of Merlot grape[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2020, 43(10): 1422-1425, 1434. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	闫静, 王德炉, 郝家孝, 等. 光照强度对贵州兔眼蓝莓果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2017, 35(4): 118-123.
	YAN J, WANG D L, HAO J X, et al. Effects of light intensity on fruit quality of rabbiteye blueberry in Guizhou[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2017, 35(4): 118-123. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	魏海蓉, 宗晓娟, 谭钺, 等. 温室弱光条件下樱桃砧木幼苗移栽到自然光下的光合和荧光特性研究[J]. 果树学报, 2014, 31(S1): 78-83.
	WEI H R, ZONG X J, TAN Y, et al. Studies on characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of sweet cherry rootstock seedlings transplanted from lowlight-grown in greenhouse to sunlight[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 31(S1): 78-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	吴兰坤, 黄卫东, 战吉成. 弱光对大樱桃坐果及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2002, 7(3): 69-74.
	WU L K, HUANG W D, ZHAN J C. Effects of low light intensity on sweet cherry fruit setting and quality[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2002, 7(3): 69-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	何发. 酸橙与甜橙的遗传起源及柑橘糖酸变化初探[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2017.
	HE F. The genetic origin of sour orange and sweet orange and a preliminary study on the change of sugar and acid in citrus[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	梁芳菲, 王小容, 邓丽莉, 等. 采后柑橘果实糖酸代谢研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2018, 44(10): 268-274.
	LIANG F F, WANG X R, DENG L L, et al. Research advances in sugar and acid metabolism of postharvest citrus fruit[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2018, 44(10): 268-274. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	招雪晴, 苑兆和. 2个石榴品种果皮花色苷合成相关基因表达分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(5): 823-829.
	ZHAO X Q, YUAN Z H. Expression profiles of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in two cultivars of Punica granatum L[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(5): 823-829. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	GARCÍA-RUIZ A, GONZÁLEZ-ROMPINELLI E M, BARTOLOMÉ B, et al. Potential of wine-associated lactic acid bacteria to degrade biogenic amines[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2011, 148(2): 115-120.
[16]	BENZIE I F F, STRAIN J J. Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration[J]. Methods in Enzymology, 1999, 299:15-27.
[17]	ARNON D I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris[J]. Plant Physiology, 1949, 24(1): 1-15.
[18]	李斌斌. 不同栽培模式对樱桃生长发育及光合特性的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
	LI B B. Effects of different cultivation patterns on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of cherry[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	叶子飘, 于强. 光合作用光响应模型的比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1356-1361.
	YE Z P, YU Q. Comparison of new and several classical models of photo-synthesis in response to irradiance[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(6): 1356-1361. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	HARRISON W G, PLATT T. Photosynthesis-irradiance relationships in polar and temperate phytoplankton populations[J]. Polar Biology, 1986, 5(3): 153-164.
[21]	童立豪, 吴翔宇, 黄良夫, 等. 光照强度与琼枝藻生长、光合色素和颜色值的相关性分析[J]. 南方水产科学, 2021, 17(5): 79-85.
	TONG L H, WU X Y, HUANG L F, et al. Correlation analysis of light intensity and growth, photosynthetic pigment, color value of Betaphycus gelatinae[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2021, 17(5): 79-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	杜中军, 翟衡, 潘志勇, 等. 盐胁迫下苹果砧木光合能力及光合色素的变化[J]. 果树学报, 2001, 18(4): 200-203.
	DU Z J, ZHAI H, PAN Z Y, et al. Change of photosynthetic capability and pigment content of apple rootstocks under salt stress[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2001, 18(4): 200-203. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	MATSUBARA S, KRAUSE G H, SELTMANN M, et al. Lutein epoxide cycle, light harvesting and photoprotection in species of the tropical tree genus Inga[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2008, 31(4): 548-561.
[24]	迟伟, 王荣富, 张成林. 遮荫条件下草莓的光合特性变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(4): 566-568.
	CHI W, WANG R F, ZHANG C L. Changes of photosynthetic characteristics of strawberry leaf under shading[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(4): 566-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	文静, 胡红玲, 陈洪, 等. 巨桉幼树对镉胁迫的光合生理响应[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(3): 30-39.
	WEN J, HU H L, CHEN H, et al. Response of photosynthetic physiology of Eucalyptus grandis saplings to cadmium stress[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(3): 30-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	RICHARDSON A D, BERLYN G P. Spectral reflectance and photosynthetic properties of Betula papyrifera(Betulaceae) leaves along an elevational gradient on Mt. Mansfield, Vermont, USA[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89(1): 88-94.
[27]	代大川, 胡红玲, 陈洪, 等. 遮阴对桢楠幼苗生长和光合生理特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(4): 56-64, 74.
	DAI D C, HU H L, CHEN H, et al. Effects of shading on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Phoebe zhennan seedlings[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(4): 56-64, 74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	邵婉璐, 李月灵, 高松, 等. 光照强度对成熟红颜草莓果实着色和花青素生物合成的影响及可能的分子机制[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(5): 661-668.
	SHAO W L, LI Y L, GAO S, et al. Effects of light intensity on the fruit coloration and anthocyanian biosynthesis in Fragaria×ananassa Duch. ‘Benihoppe’ and the possible molecular mechanism[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(5): 661-668. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content/(mg·g^-1)	可滴定酸含量 Titratable acid content/(mg·g^-1)	糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio
CK	103.52±4.27 a	5.49±0.10 b	18.86±0.59 b
A	106.58±5.32 a	4.84±0.11 c	22.00±2.40 a
B	103.73±0.88 a	5.94±0.05 a	17.45±0.40 b
C	100.13±1.86 a	5.75±0.01 ab	17.41±0.52 b
D	84.57±4.88 b	5.06±0.04 c	16.73±1.19 b

处理 Treatment	可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content/(mg·g^-1)	可滴定酸含量 Titratable acid content/(mg·g^-1)	糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio
CK	103.52±4.27 a	5.49±0.10 b	18.86±0.59 b
A	106.58±5.32 a	4.84±0.11 c	22.00±2.40 a
B	103.73±0.88 a	5.94±0.05 a	17.45±0.40 b
C	100.13±1.86 a	5.75±0.01 ab	17.41±0.52 b
D	84.57±4.88 b	5.06±0.04 c	16.73±1.19 b

处理 Treatment	叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content	叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content	叶绿素总含量 Total chlorophyll content	类胡萝卜素含量 Carotenoids content
CK	1.073±0.031 b	0.475±0.005 b	1.549±0.026 c	0.525±0.003 b
A	1.089±0.005 b	0.463±0.005 b	1.552±0.008 c	0.493±0.016 b
B	1.208±0.015 a	0.463±0.003 b	1.670±0.017 b	0.533±0.010 b
C	1.202±0.019 a	0.493±0.015 b	1.695±0.006 b	0.664±0.044 a
D	1.223±0.037 a	0.578±0.075 a	1.801±0.040 a	0.652±0.071 a

处理 Treatment	叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content	叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content	叶绿素总含量 Total chlorophyll content	类胡萝卜素含量 Carotenoids content
CK	1.073±0.031 b	0.475±0.005 b	1.549±0.026 c	0.525±0.003 b
A	1.089±0.005 b	0.463±0.005 b	1.552±0.008 c	0.493±0.016 b
B	1.208±0.015 a	0.463±0.003 b	1.670±0.017 b	0.533±0.010 b
C	1.202±0.019 a	0.493±0.015 b	1.695±0.006 b	0.664±0.044 a
D	1.223±0.037 a	0.578±0.075 a	1.801±0.040 a	0.652±0.071 a

处理	P_n/(μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	T_r/(mol·m^-2·s^-1)	G_s/(mol·m^-2·s^-1)	C_i/(μmol ·mol^-1)	T/℃
Treatment
CK	11.097 1±0.062 1 b	0.001 2±0.001 1 b	0.140 4±0.001 6 b	243.926 6±2.307 3 a	30.200 0±1.000 a
A	12.323 6±0.163 1 a	0.001 4±0.004 0 a	0.151 8±0.004 1 a	244.943 6±1.553 3 a	28.300 0±1.100 b
B	10.953 3±0.248 5 b	0.001 2±0.003 4 b	0.124 4±0.003 7 c	234.481 7±1.093 6 b	25.300 0±0.900 c
C	10.160 9±0.171 4 c	0.001 1±0.001 3 c	0.126 1±0.001 6 c	247.407 5±3.877 6 a	25.200 0±0.700 c
D	8.424 9±0.136 0 d	0.000 9±0.001 0 d	0.098 0±0.001 0 d	241.549 4±1.724 6 a	24.600 0±0.500 c

Effects of different shading rates on fruit quality and photosynthetic characteristics of sweet cherry

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 28

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

处理 Treatment	AQY	P_n (max)/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	LSP/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	LCP/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	R_d/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)
CK	0.081 5±0.001 5 b	11.319 6±0.090 0 b	961.420 6±45.593 6 ab	27.492 2±0.500 5 a	2.005 5±0.000 6 a
A	0.089 1±0.000 4 a	13.758 6±0.266 5 a	1 069.426 7±22.457 9 a	28.868 0±1.102 1 a	2.314 6±0.068 5 a
B	0.078 6±0.000 1 b	10.786 8±0.056 8 b	912.118 6±73.851 6 ab	14.955 8±2.818 7 b	1.096 7±0.193 1 b
C	0.070 7±0.001 3 c	8.374 0±0.434 7 c	752.342 2±95.986 7 b	9.695 9±0.591 0 c	0.650 6±0.027 4 c
D	0.069 1±0.001 9 c	7.121 1±0.178 5 d	737.983 5±25.311 7 b	9.269 9±0.038 0 c	0.604 9±0.013 5 c

处理 Treatment	数量 Quantity	明度L Lightness	红绿值a Red green degree	黄蓝值b Yellow blue degree
CK	20	26.16±1.82 c	15.69±3.45 b	4.06±1.11 b
A	20	26.63±1.46 c	19.06±4.58 b	1.41±1.74 b
B	20	25.95±1.86 c	14.35±2.99 b	3.77±0.91 b
C	20	30.64±2.93 b	27.95±4.43 a	9.40±2.96 a
D	20	32.94±2.14 a	34.14±5.21 a	13.34±3.36 a

[1]	YUE Zongwei, LI Jiaxiao, SUN Xiangyang, LIU Guoliang, LI Suyan, WANG Chenchen, ZHA Guichao, WEI Ningxian. Effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on soil properties, cherry fruit quality and yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201.
[2]	ZHANG Bo, LIU Zeci, WANG Jie, LI Zhaozhuang, LI Lushan, HU Linli, YU Jihua. Effects of different fertilizer formulations of agricultural wastes on growth, yield and quality of cabbage [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792.
[3]	ZHANG Ning, TAO Ronghao, LIU Peishi, HU Hanxiu, GAO Linlin, GUO Long, ZHU Zunyou, MA Youhua. Effects of organic fertilizer coupled with chemical fertilizer on growth and quality of tea and soil fertility [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.
[4]	WANG Di, YANG Hanmei, LI Yangqian, JIA Mengting, ZOU Liang, YANG Fan. Multidimensional evaluation of “variety, quality, efficiency and application” of Tartary buckwheat and research progress of high-value utilization of active ingredients [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974.
[5]	TIAN Yugang, WAN Sumei, LIN Jiao, CHEN Guodong, LI Hao, HU Yukai, LI Yanfang, HU Shoulin, MAO Tingyong, ZHAO Shuzhen. Effect of mulch types and irrigation amounts on photosynthetic parameters, yield and quality of cotton [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1523-1531.
[6]	YANG Kun, HOU Guanjun, ZHAO Xiuxia, FANG Ting, WANG Lijun. Effects of aquatic animals-plants synergistic purification system on water quality and economic benefit in mandarin fish pond [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1709-1719.
[7]	BU Yuanpeng, LIU Na, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming, XU Linying. Diversity evaluation of agronomic traits and construction of core collection and taste quality evaluation system in vegetable soybean germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314.
[8]	CHAI Guanqun, ZHOU Wei, LIANG Hong, FAN Feifei, ZHU Dayan, FAN Chengwu. Effect of foliar spraying of zinc fertilizer and citric acid on yield, quality and Cd absorption and transport ation of pepper [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1069-1079.
[9]	XIAO Lihan, XIN Meiguo, LU Wenjing, YE Qin, ZHANG Cen, XIAO Chaogeng, CHEN Di. Effects of different storage conditions on quality of royal jelly from three pollen sources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(5): 1161-1167.
[10]	MA Yihu, ZENG Xiaoyuan, HE Xianbiao, ZHOU Naidi, CHEN Jian. Response of grain yield and quality of high quality rice to climate factors at different sowing dates in southeastern Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 736-751.
[11]	ZENG Xiaochun, LI Suicheng, SHI Guanqing, XING Zeyu. Comprehensive evaluation of China’s regional agricultural quality development level based on entropy weight TOPSIS under background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals: from perspective of change speed [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 962-972.
[12]	WANG Jinfeng, ZHOU Qi, LYU Yulong, CHEN Zhuomei. Effects of intercropping tea with landscape trees on ecosystem of tea garden and tea production [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 523-533.
[13]	WANG Longwei, BAI Junyan, JIA Xiaoping, LEI Ying, CHEN Mengke, FAN Hongdeng, LU Xiaoning, HE Yuhan, ZENG Fanlin, ZHANG Rongkai. Association analysis between GnRH-1 gene polymorphism and egg quality in quail [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 565-574.
[14]	LIN Yong, DAI Weiwei, BAO Encai, WANG Qiang, BAI Zongchun, XIA Liru, ZHANG Yao, SUN Yulun, OUYANG Lihu. Optimization and computational fluid dynamics analysis of fan operation for cascading cage-rearing meat duck house in summer [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 666-675.
[15]	ZHANG Yanbin, GENG Bin, LIANG Ying, XU Tiaojuan, XU Baogen, ZENG Xin, ZHANG Yueyue. Research on promotion mechanism of “standard land” reform to high quality development of modern agriculture [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 688-697.

处理 Treatment	CK	A	B	C
A	4.31
B	1.39	5.31
C	14.10	12.61	15.45
D	21.74	20.24	23.07	7.69

处理 Treatment	CK	A	B	C
A	4.31
B	1.39	5.31
C	14.10	12.61	15.45
D	21.74	20.24	23.07	7.69