Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1852-1860.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.08
• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
REN Qianqian1,2(
), SUN Jixia1, ZHANG Deshun3, DING Zhaotang4, ZHANG Yingjie1, ZHANG Jingwei2,*(
)
Received:2020-08-25
Online:2021-10-25
Published:2021-11-02
Contact:
ZHANG Jingwei
CLC Number:
REN Qianqian, SUN Jixia, ZHANG Deshun, DING Zhaotang, ZHANG Yingjie, ZHANG Jingwei. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different Hydrangea varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.08
| 光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
| Chla | CK | 1.22±0.10 Aa | 1.28±0.12 Aa | 1.21±0.15 Bab | 1.18±0.21 Bb | 1.06±0.17 ABa | 1.10±0.08 Bc |
| T1 | 1.46±0.29 Aa | 1.11±0.32 Aa | 1.08±0.16 Ba | 0.96±0.09 Aa | 1.05±0.29Ba | 1.10±0.30 Aa | |
| T2 | 1.58±0.08 Aa | 1.53±0.08 Aa | 1.44±0.18 Aa | 1.35±0.11 Aa | 1.45±0.34 ABa | 1.42±0.14 Aa | |
| T3 | 1.35±0.22 Ab | 1.45±0.18 Ab | 1.43±0.12 ABb | 1.40±0.07 Ab | 1.39±0.09 Aa | 1.40±0.11 ABc | |
| T4 | 1.54±0.13 Aa | 1.41±0.31 Aa | 1.35±0.30 ABa | 1.34±0.15 Aa | 1.48±0.16 ABa | 1.44±0.07 Aa | |
| Chlb | CK | 0.50±0.06 Aab | 0.79±0.49 Aa | 0.77±0.06 Bab | 0.76±0.08 Cb | 0.45±0.10 Bab | 0.46±0.02 Cb |
| T1 | 0.98±0.17 Aa | 0.86±0.20 Ab | 0.72±0.03 Bb | 0.57±0.04 Cb | 0.49±0.19 Bb | 0.52±0.14 Ab | |
| T2 | 0.77±0.13 Aa | 0.72±0.05 Aa | 0.62±0.22 Aa | 0.56±0.09 Aa | 0.71±0.24 Ba | 0.69±0.07 Ba | |
| T3 | 0.58±0.14 Ab | 0.62±0.14 Ab | 0.61±0.08 ABb | 0.59±0.04 ABb | 0.61±0.17 Aa | 0.60±0.06 BCb | |
| T4 | 1.19±0.83 Ab | 1.12±1.16 Ab | 1.27±0.14 Bb | 1.68±0.14 Cb | 1.75±0.74 Ba | 1.07±0.02 BCb | |
| Chla+b | CK | 2.48±0.11 Aab | 1.94±0.77 Ab | 1.93±0.07 Aab | 1.87±0.08 ABa | 2.35±0.07 Aab | 2.39±0.15 Aab |
| T1 | 1.49±0.17 Ca | 1.26±0.99 Aa | 1.66±0.40 Aa | 1.91±0.12 ABa | 2.20±0.19 Aa | 2.12±0.70 Aa | |
| T2 | 2.07±0.21 ABCa | 2.16±0.11 Aa | 2.32±0.35 Aa | 2.41±0.11 Ba | 2.15±0.24 Aa | 2.16±0.05 Aa | |
| T3 | 2.37±0.18 ABa | 2.38±0.28 Aa | 2.36±0.08 Aa | 2.42±0.02 ABa | 2.34±0.23 Bb | 2.37±0.25 Aa | |
| T4 | 1.68±0.84 BCab | 1.77±1.14 Abc | 1.70±0.11 Aab | 1.31±0.63 Aa | 1.22±0.15 Cc | 1.86±0.15 Aab | |
| Chla/b | CK | 0.50±0.16 Bab | 0.64±0.60 ABa | 0.69±0.20 Babc | 0.78±0.29 Cbc | 0.66±0.26 BCa | 0.56±0.09 Dc |
| T1 | 0.98±0.45 ABa | 0.92±0.18 Bb | 0.85±0.14 Bb | 0.72±0.13 Bb | 0.59±0.49 Cb | 0.53±0.16 Aab | |
| T2 | 0.77±0.21 ABa | 0.75±0.13 ABa | 0.71±0.40 Aa | 0.64±0.19 Aa | 0.63±0.56 BCa | 0.65±0.21 ABa | |
| T3 | 0.58±0.37 ABbc | 0.60±0.31 ABb | 0.60±0.20 ABb | 0.61±0.09 Ab | 0.60±0.26 Ba | 0.60±0.15 Cc | |
| T4 | 1.19±0.90 Ab | 1.16±1.44 Ab | 1.19±0.44 Bb | 1.36±0.29 Bb | 1.57±0.58 Aa | 1.50±0.08 BCb | |
| Car | CK | 2.48±0.05 Ca | 2.21±0.08 Aa | 2.12±0.06 Bab | 1.91±0.07 b | 2.05±0.07 Ba | 2.21±0.01 Cb |
| T1 | 1.49±0.08 Aa | 1.37±0.02 Ab | 1.47±0.03 ABb | 1.61±0.04 ABb | 1.92±0.12 Bb | 2.08±0.04 Ab | |
| T2 | 2.07±0.05 ABCa | 2.12±0.04 Aa | 2.18±0.10 Aa | 2.30±0.06 Aa | 2.30±0.14 Ba | 2.24±0.04 Ba | |
| T3 | 2.37±0.08 BCbc | 2.37±0.07 Abc | 2.37±0.04 ABbc | 2.39±0.06 Ab | 2.37±0.05 ABa | 2.38±0.05 Bc | |
| T4 | 1.68±0.14 ABab | 1.73±0.27 Aab | 1.72±0.11 Bb | 1.60±0.16 ABb | 1.41±0.03 Aa | 1.47±0.02 Bb | |
Table 1 Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic pigment content of six Hydrangea varieties
| 光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
| Chla | CK | 1.22±0.10 Aa | 1.28±0.12 Aa | 1.21±0.15 Bab | 1.18±0.21 Bb | 1.06±0.17 ABa | 1.10±0.08 Bc |
| T1 | 1.46±0.29 Aa | 1.11±0.32 Aa | 1.08±0.16 Ba | 0.96±0.09 Aa | 1.05±0.29Ba | 1.10±0.30 Aa | |
| T2 | 1.58±0.08 Aa | 1.53±0.08 Aa | 1.44±0.18 Aa | 1.35±0.11 Aa | 1.45±0.34 ABa | 1.42±0.14 Aa | |
| T3 | 1.35±0.22 Ab | 1.45±0.18 Ab | 1.43±0.12 ABb | 1.40±0.07 Ab | 1.39±0.09 Aa | 1.40±0.11 ABc | |
| T4 | 1.54±0.13 Aa | 1.41±0.31 Aa | 1.35±0.30 ABa | 1.34±0.15 Aa | 1.48±0.16 ABa | 1.44±0.07 Aa | |
| Chlb | CK | 0.50±0.06 Aab | 0.79±0.49 Aa | 0.77±0.06 Bab | 0.76±0.08 Cb | 0.45±0.10 Bab | 0.46±0.02 Cb |
| T1 | 0.98±0.17 Aa | 0.86±0.20 Ab | 0.72±0.03 Bb | 0.57±0.04 Cb | 0.49±0.19 Bb | 0.52±0.14 Ab | |
| T2 | 0.77±0.13 Aa | 0.72±0.05 Aa | 0.62±0.22 Aa | 0.56±0.09 Aa | 0.71±0.24 Ba | 0.69±0.07 Ba | |
| T3 | 0.58±0.14 Ab | 0.62±0.14 Ab | 0.61±0.08 ABb | 0.59±0.04 ABb | 0.61±0.17 Aa | 0.60±0.06 BCb | |
| T4 | 1.19±0.83 Ab | 1.12±1.16 Ab | 1.27±0.14 Bb | 1.68±0.14 Cb | 1.75±0.74 Ba | 1.07±0.02 BCb | |
| Chla+b | CK | 2.48±0.11 Aab | 1.94±0.77 Ab | 1.93±0.07 Aab | 1.87±0.08 ABa | 2.35±0.07 Aab | 2.39±0.15 Aab |
| T1 | 1.49±0.17 Ca | 1.26±0.99 Aa | 1.66±0.40 Aa | 1.91±0.12 ABa | 2.20±0.19 Aa | 2.12±0.70 Aa | |
| T2 | 2.07±0.21 ABCa | 2.16±0.11 Aa | 2.32±0.35 Aa | 2.41±0.11 Ba | 2.15±0.24 Aa | 2.16±0.05 Aa | |
| T3 | 2.37±0.18 ABa | 2.38±0.28 Aa | 2.36±0.08 Aa | 2.42±0.02 ABa | 2.34±0.23 Bb | 2.37±0.25 Aa | |
| T4 | 1.68±0.84 BCab | 1.77±1.14 Abc | 1.70±0.11 Aab | 1.31±0.63 Aa | 1.22±0.15 Cc | 1.86±0.15 Aab | |
| Chla/b | CK | 0.50±0.16 Bab | 0.64±0.60 ABa | 0.69±0.20 Babc | 0.78±0.29 Cbc | 0.66±0.26 BCa | 0.56±0.09 Dc |
| T1 | 0.98±0.45 ABa | 0.92±0.18 Bb | 0.85±0.14 Bb | 0.72±0.13 Bb | 0.59±0.49 Cb | 0.53±0.16 Aab | |
| T2 | 0.77±0.21 ABa | 0.75±0.13 ABa | 0.71±0.40 Aa | 0.64±0.19 Aa | 0.63±0.56 BCa | 0.65±0.21 ABa | |
| T3 | 0.58±0.37 ABbc | 0.60±0.31 ABb | 0.60±0.20 ABb | 0.61±0.09 Ab | 0.60±0.26 Ba | 0.60±0.15 Cc | |
| T4 | 1.19±0.90 Ab | 1.16±1.44 Ab | 1.19±0.44 Bb | 1.36±0.29 Bb | 1.57±0.58 Aa | 1.50±0.08 BCb | |
| Car | CK | 2.48±0.05 Ca | 2.21±0.08 Aa | 2.12±0.06 Bab | 1.91±0.07 b | 2.05±0.07 Ba | 2.21±0.01 Cb |
| T1 | 1.49±0.08 Aa | 1.37±0.02 Ab | 1.47±0.03 ABb | 1.61±0.04 ABb | 1.92±0.12 Bb | 2.08±0.04 Ab | |
| T2 | 2.07±0.05 ABCa | 2.12±0.04 Aa | 2.18±0.10 Aa | 2.30±0.06 Aa | 2.30±0.14 Ba | 2.24±0.04 Ba | |
| T3 | 2.37±0.08 BCbc | 2.37±0.07 Abc | 2.37±0.04 ABbc | 2.39±0.06 Ab | 2.37±0.05 ABa | 2.38±0.05 Bc | |
| T4 | 1.68±0.14 ABab | 1.73±0.27 Aab | 1.72±0.11 Bb | 1.60±0.16 ABb | 1.41±0.03 Aa | 1.47±0.02 Bb | |
| 渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
| Pro | CK | 4.72±0.796 Ba | 10.50±3.72 Ba | 13.92±11.18 Ba | 10.67±5.58 Da | 6.86±2.50 Ca | 10.33±2.49 Ca |
| T1 | 5.56±1.35 Bc | 11.71±6.43 Babc | 15.55±2.80 Ba | 14.33±1.26 CDab | 8.22±3.19 Cbc | 11.06±4.60 Cabc | |
| T2 | 15.95±2.43 Aab | 12.23±2.49 Bab | 20.23±7.75 Ba | 19.41±1.90 BCa | 8.04±1.55 Cb | 15.75±5.69 Cab | |
| T3 | 22.66±3.05 Aa | 19.14±7.73 Ba | 22.04±8.26 Ba | 21.79±1.28 ABa | 24.27±3.92 Ba | 18.60±4.48 ABa | |
| T4 | 23.69±8.95 Ac | 33.14±12.54 Abc | 10.89±8.46 Aab | 26.94±1.81Abc | 53.39±7.14Aa | 26.07±6.37Abc | |
| SS | CK | 0.29±0.07 Ba | 0.46±0.72 Ca | 0.32±0.11 Ca | 0.28±0.30 Ca | 0.42±0.26 Ba | 0.41±0.23 Da |
| T1 | 0.65±0.30 Ba | 0.74±0.11 Ca | 0.89±0.24 Ca | 1.38±1.12 BCa | 1.69±1.05 Ba | 0.96±0.14 CDa | |
| T2 | 1.48±0.80 Bc | 1.06±0.31 BCc | 3.99±2.52 Bab | 2.09±1.20 ABbc | 4.85±0.71 Aa | 1.28±0.35 Cc | |
| T3 | 3.99±1.22 Aab | 2.62±1.49 ABb | 5.69±1.76 ABa | 2.13±0.55 ABb | 5.13±0.60 Aa | 1.96±0.10 BBb | |
| T4 | 5.56±1.92 Aab | 3.94±1.46 Ab | 7.47±1.22 Aa | 3.24±0.79 Ab | 5.34±0.80 Aab | 3.43±0.57 Ab | |
| SP | CK | 18.54±2.83 Aa | 140.81±6.02Aab | 15.71±0.65 Aab | 7.18±2.34 Bc | 10.19±4.74 Cbc | 10.85±2.38 Bbc |
| T1 | 22.38±2.73 Aab | 25.68±9.81 Ab | 16.85±3.06 Ab | 16.25±3.54 Ab | 38.48±6.57 Aa | 17.94±1.27 Ab | |
| T2 | 19.86±5.97 Aab | 21.54±2.22 Aab | 15.71±8.63 Ab | 14.45±2.88 Ab | 27.97±5.31 ABa | 16.07±1.62 Ab | |
| T3 | 19.14±2.50 Aab | 18.35±6.16 Aab | 12.95±2.56 Abc | 12.83±0.83 Abc | 24.66±3.71 Ba | 11.81±2.09 Bc | |
| T4 | 15.17±4.07 Aa | 16.01±6.55 Aa | 12.23±3.16 Aa | 10.97±3.85 ABa | 21.36±10.58 BCa | 11.03±0.65 Ba | |
Table 2 Effect of drought stress on osmotic substances content of six Hydrangea varieties
| 渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance | 处理 Treat- ment | 品种Variety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花手鞠 Stockings | 头花 Corsage | 爱你的吻 Love You Kiss | 白色天使 White Angel | 夏祭 Summer Sacrifice | 万华镜 Mangek you | ||
| Pro | CK | 4.72±0.796 Ba | 10.50±3.72 Ba | 13.92±11.18 Ba | 10.67±5.58 Da | 6.86±2.50 Ca | 10.33±2.49 Ca |
| T1 | 5.56±1.35 Bc | 11.71±6.43 Babc | 15.55±2.80 Ba | 14.33±1.26 CDab | 8.22±3.19 Cbc | 11.06±4.60 Cabc | |
| T2 | 15.95±2.43 Aab | 12.23±2.49 Bab | 20.23±7.75 Ba | 19.41±1.90 BCa | 8.04±1.55 Cb | 15.75±5.69 Cab | |
| T3 | 22.66±3.05 Aa | 19.14±7.73 Ba | 22.04±8.26 Ba | 21.79±1.28 ABa | 24.27±3.92 Ba | 18.60±4.48 ABa | |
| T4 | 23.69±8.95 Ac | 33.14±12.54 Abc | 10.89±8.46 Aab | 26.94±1.81Abc | 53.39±7.14Aa | 26.07±6.37Abc | |
| SS | CK | 0.29±0.07 Ba | 0.46±0.72 Ca | 0.32±0.11 Ca | 0.28±0.30 Ca | 0.42±0.26 Ba | 0.41±0.23 Da |
| T1 | 0.65±0.30 Ba | 0.74±0.11 Ca | 0.89±0.24 Ca | 1.38±1.12 BCa | 1.69±1.05 Ba | 0.96±0.14 CDa | |
| T2 | 1.48±0.80 Bc | 1.06±0.31 BCc | 3.99±2.52 Bab | 2.09±1.20 ABbc | 4.85±0.71 Aa | 1.28±0.35 Cc | |
| T3 | 3.99±1.22 Aab | 2.62±1.49 ABb | 5.69±1.76 ABa | 2.13±0.55 ABb | 5.13±0.60 Aa | 1.96±0.10 BBb | |
| T4 | 5.56±1.92 Aab | 3.94±1.46 Ab | 7.47±1.22 Aa | 3.24±0.79 Ab | 5.34±0.80 Aab | 3.43±0.57 Ab | |
| SP | CK | 18.54±2.83 Aa | 140.81±6.02Aab | 15.71±0.65 Aab | 7.18±2.34 Bc | 10.19±4.74 Cbc | 10.85±2.38 Bbc |
| T1 | 22.38±2.73 Aab | 25.68±9.81 Ab | 16.85±3.06 Ab | 16.25±3.54 Ab | 38.48±6.57 Aa | 17.94±1.27 Ab | |
| T2 | 19.86±5.97 Aab | 21.54±2.22 Aab | 15.71±8.63 Ab | 14.45±2.88 Ab | 27.97±5.31 ABa | 16.07±1.62 Ab | |
| T3 | 19.14±2.50 Aab | 18.35±6.16 Aab | 12.95±2.56 Abc | 12.83±0.83 Abc | 24.66±3.71 Ba | 11.81±2.09 Bc | |
| T4 | 15.17±4.07 Aa | 16.01±6.55 Aa | 12.23±3.16 Aa | 10.97±3.85 ABa | 21.36±10.58 BCa | 11.03±0.65 Ba | |
| 指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 主成分4 Principal component 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 类胡萝卜素含量Carotenoid content | 0.439 | 0.832 | 0.138 | -0.230 |
| 相对含水量Relative water content | -0.933 | -0.165 | -0.004 | -0.176 |
| POD活性Peroxidase activity | 0.814 | 0.291 | 0.073 | 0.148 |
| Chlb含量Chlorophyll-b content | 0.759 | 0.545 | 0.132 | -0.193 |
| Pro含量Proline content | 0.739 | -0.086 | 0.483 | -0.068 |
| Chla+b含量Chlorophyll-a+b content | 0.667 | 0.664 | 0.118 | -0.185 |
| MDA含量Malondialdehyde content | 0.662 | 0.240 | -0.495 | 0.206 |
| Chla含量Chlorophyll-a content | -0.277 | 0.908 | -0.039 | -0.012 |
| Chla/b含量Chlorophyll a/b content | -0.576 | -0.720 | -0.174 | 0.276 |
| SP含量Soluble protein content | 0.313 | 0.710 | 0.126 | 0.193 |
| 相对电导率Relative conductivity | 0.526 | 0.704 | 0.109 | 0.057 |
| SOD活性Superoxide dismutase activity | 0.293 | 0.604 | 0.442 | -0.210 |
| SS含量Soluble sugar content | -0.031 | 0.148 | 0.857 | 0.163 |
| 根冠比Root-shoot ratio | -0.300 | -0.283 | -0.588 | 0.343 |
| 生物量Biomass | 0.160 | -0.064 | 0.004 | 0.869 |
| 方差贡献率Variance contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 14.06 | 10.45 | 6.76 |
| 累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 64.73 | 75.19 | 81.94 |
Table 3 Load matrix, variance contribution rate and cumulative contribution rate of each factor
| 指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 主成分4 Principal component 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 类胡萝卜素含量Carotenoid content | 0.439 | 0.832 | 0.138 | -0.230 |
| 相对含水量Relative water content | -0.933 | -0.165 | -0.004 | -0.176 |
| POD活性Peroxidase activity | 0.814 | 0.291 | 0.073 | 0.148 |
| Chlb含量Chlorophyll-b content | 0.759 | 0.545 | 0.132 | -0.193 |
| Pro含量Proline content | 0.739 | -0.086 | 0.483 | -0.068 |
| Chla+b含量Chlorophyll-a+b content | 0.667 | 0.664 | 0.118 | -0.185 |
| MDA含量Malondialdehyde content | 0.662 | 0.240 | -0.495 | 0.206 |
| Chla含量Chlorophyll-a content | -0.277 | 0.908 | -0.039 | -0.012 |
| Chla/b含量Chlorophyll a/b content | -0.576 | -0.720 | -0.174 | 0.276 |
| SP含量Soluble protein content | 0.313 | 0.710 | 0.126 | 0.193 |
| 相对电导率Relative conductivity | 0.526 | 0.704 | 0.109 | 0.057 |
| SOD活性Superoxide dismutase activity | 0.293 | 0.604 | 0.442 | -0.210 |
| SS含量Soluble sugar content | -0.031 | 0.148 | 0.857 | 0.163 |
| 根冠比Root-shoot ratio | -0.300 | -0.283 | -0.588 | 0.343 |
| 生物量Biomass | 0.160 | -0.064 | 0.004 | 0.869 |
| 方差贡献率Variance contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 14.06 | 10.45 | 6.76 |
| 累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 50.67 | 64.73 | 75.19 | 81.94 |
| 品种Variety | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花手鞠Stockings | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.250 |
| 头花Corsage | 0.18 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 0.366 |
| 爱你的吻Love You Kiss | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.76 | 0.517 |
| 白色天使White Angel | 0.10 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.294 |
| 夏祭Summer Sacrifice | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.092 |
| 万华镜Mangek you | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.920 |
| 权重Weight | 0.617 | 0.172 | 0.128 | 0.083 |
Table 4 Membership function value U(Xi), weight and comprehensive evaluation value (D) of various varieties
| 品种Variety | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花手鞠Stockings | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.250 |
| 头花Corsage | 0.18 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 0.366 |
| 爱你的吻Love You Kiss | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.76 | 0.517 |
| 白色天使White Angel | 0.10 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.294 |
| 夏祭Summer Sacrifice | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.092 |
| 万华镜Mangek you | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.920 |
| 权重Weight | 0.617 | 0.172 | 0.128 | 0.083 |
| [1] | 孙强, 虞秀明, 姚红军. 绣球属品种资源收集及扦插生根能力比较[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(11):71-73. |
| SUN Q, YU X M, YAO H J. Resource collection and comparison of cuttings rooting ability for Hydrangea L.[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(11):71-73.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 杨春. 八仙花的栽培管理技术[J]. 农业工程技术(温室园艺), 2014, 34(1):42. |
| YANG C. Cultivation and management techniques of Hydrangea[J]. Agriculture Engineering Technology (Greenhouse & Horticulture), 2014, 34(1):42. | |
| [3] | 章毅. 5个绣球品种的抗旱性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018. |
| ZHANG Y. Study on drought tolerance of 5 cultivars of Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 陈丽飞, 刘越, 李雪萌, 等. 植物抗旱性研究进展[J]. 吉林农业, 2019(2):78-79. |
| CHEN L F, LIU Y, LI X M, et al. Research progress of plant drought resistance[J]. Agriculture of Jilin, 2019(2):78-79. | |
| [5] | 李艳, 王庆, 刘国宇, 等. 4种地被植物干旱胁迫下的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6):9-15. |
| LI Y, WANG Q, LIU G Y, et al. Responses of four ground cover plants to drought stress and the comprehensive evaluation on drought resistance capacity[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(6):9-15.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 谭艳, 彭尽晖. 植物抗旱机理及抗旱性鉴定方法研究进展[J]. 广西农业科学, 2010, 41(5):423-426. |
| TAN Y, PENG J H. Research progress on mechanism and identification methods of drought resistance in plants[J]. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 41(5):423-426.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 孟祥丽, 徐坚, 陈文荣, 等. 4种砧木樱桃的抗旱生理特性及抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(3):533-537. |
| MENG X L, XU J, CHEN W R, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of four cherry rootstocks by membership function analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(3):533-537.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 邹春蕾, 王丽萍, 辛彬, 等. 不同果形红干椒品系抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5):792-797. |
| ZOU C L, WANG L P, XIN B, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of chilli pepper with different fruit shapes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(5):792-797.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 许桂芳, 张朝阳, 向佐湘. 利用隶属函数法对4种珍珠菜属过路黄抗旱性的综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2009, 21(1):59-62. |
| XU G F, ZHANG Z Y, XIANG Z X. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of four Lysimachia species by using subordinate function[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2009, 21(1):59-62.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 林蝉蝉, 何舟阳, 单文龙, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析综合评价杨凌地区红色鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(4):520-532. |
| LIN C C, HE Z Y, SHAN W L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of 12 red table grape cultivars cultivated in Yangling area based on principal component and cluster analyses[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(4):520-532.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 郭燕, 张树航, 李颖, 等. 中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6):1033-1046. |
| GUO Y, ZHANG S H, LI Y, et al. Studies on the leaf morphology, anatomical structure and drought resistance evaluation of 238 Chinese chestnut varieties(strains)[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(6):1033-1046.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 等. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11):1378-1382. |
| ZHOU G S, MEI F Z, ZHOU Z Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of waterlogging resistance of different wheat varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(11):1378-1382.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 张庆华, 向发云, 曾祥国, 等. 干旱胁迫下不同品种草莓生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(2):30-37. |
| ZHANG Q H, XIANG F Y, ZENG X G, et al. Physiological response of different strawberry cultivars under drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(2):30-37.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] |
邱权, 潘昕, 李吉跃, 等. 青藏高原20种灌木抗旱形态和生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6):562-575.
DOI |
|
QIU Q, PAN X, LI J Y, et al. Morphological traits and physiological characteristics in drought tolerance in 20 shrub species on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(6):562-575.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
| [15] | 董晓晓, 刘雪, 蒋亚蓉, 等. 干旱胁迫对24种宿根花卉生长的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3):125-131. |
| DONG X X, LIU X, JIANG Y R, et al. Effect of drought stress on the growth of twenty four perennials[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(3):125-131.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 侯茹平, 蒋景龙, 阳妮, 等. 低温胁迫下8种柑橘的生理响应与抗寒性评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021(6):2013-2022. |
| HOU R P, JIANG J L, YANG N, et al. Physiological response and cold resistance evaluation of eight citrus species under low temperature stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021(6):2013-2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 金胶胶, 宋子文, 马晓雨, 等. 大青杨对不同干旱胁迫强度的形态和生理响应[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(4):490-496. |
| JIN J J, SONG Z W, MA X Y, et al. Morphological and physiological responses of Populus ussuriensis Kom. to drought stress[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(4):490-496.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 王平, 王沛, 孙万斌, 等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2):397-404. |
| WANG P, WANG P, SUN W B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of eight Elymus germplasms at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2):397-404.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 李永华, 卢琦, 吴波, 等. 干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1):88-98. |
|
LI Y H, LU Q, WU B, et al. A review of leaf morphology plasticity linked to plant response and adaptation characteristics in arid ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(1):88-98.(in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
| [20] | 李州, 王晓娟, 彭丹丹, 等. Na+对水分胁迫下白三叶抗氧化防御和有机渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5):175-183. |
| LI Z, WANG X J, PENG D D, et al. Effects of Na+ on antioxidant defence and accumulation of osmoregulatory substances in white clover under water deficit stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5):175-183.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 邵惠芳, 陈征, 许嘉阳, 等. 两种烟草幼苗叶片对不同强度干旱胁迫的生理响应比较[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(12):1861-1871. |
| SHAO H F, CHEN Z, XU J Y, et al. Physiological responses of two tobacco cultivar leaves to different drought stresses during seedling stage[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(12):1861-1871.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 冯慧芳, 薛立, 任向荣, 等. 4种阔叶幼苗对PEG模拟干旱的生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(2):371-382. |
| FENG H F, XUE L, REN X R, et al. Physiological responses of four broadleaved seedlings to drought stress simulated by PEG[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(2):371-382.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 卜贤盼, 纠凤凤, 王锋堂, 等. 五唇兰对PEG模拟的干旱胁迫响应研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(1):53-61. |
| BU X P, JIU F F, WANG F T, et al. Response to drought stress simulated by PEG of Phalaenopsis pulcherrima[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2020, 28(1):53-61.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 肖涵, 张鸿翎, 韩涛, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种宿根花卉生理生化指标的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(5):102-107. |
| XIAO H, ZHANG H L, HAN T, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical indices of three species perennial flowers[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(5):102-107.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 曹晶, 姜卫兵, 翁忙玲, 等. 夏秋季旱涝胁迫对红叶石楠光合特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(1):163-172. |
| CAO J, JIANG W B, WENG M L, et al. Effects of drought and flooding stress on photosynthetic characteristics of Photinia frasery in summer and autumn[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, 34(1):163-172.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 董小云, 米超, 刘自刚, 等. PEG模拟水分胁迫对白菜型冬油菜幼苗生长及生长特性的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2018, 52(3):313-321. |
| DONG X Y, MI C, LIU Z G, et al. Response of winter rapessed seeding growth and physiological characteristics under PEG drought tolerance[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018, 52(3):313-321.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 王好运, 吴峰, 吴昌明, 等. 马尾松不同叶型幼苗对干旱及复水的生长及生理响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(1):1-6. |
| WANG H Y, WU F, WU C M, et al. Growth and physiological responses of seedlings with different leaf shapes to drought and re-watering in Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(1):1-6.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 孔维鹏, 张小艾. 四个无花果品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(增刊1):105-113. |
| KONG W P, ZHANG X A. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of four fig varieties to drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(S1):105-113.(in Chinesewith English abstract) | |
| [29] | 余家林. 农业多元试验统计[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993:141-192. |
| [30] | 田治国, 王飞, 张文娥, 等. 多元统计分析方法在万寿菊品种抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12):3315-3320. |
| TIAN Z G, WANG F, ZHANG W E, et al. Drought-resistance evaluation of marigold cultivars based on multiple statistics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12):3315-3320.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | XU Weimeng, XU Yan, CHEN Guoli. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [2] | LIU Guomin, ZHENG Xu, LIAO Yujiao, QIN Yexin, QIN Weizhi. Effect of grafting on cold resistance of potato seedlings under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1615-1623. |
| [3] | TAN Yali, GAO Mengxiang, LI Xiaojie, ZHOU Yingjie, XIONG Jian, ZENG Ziqi, LI Xiao, YANG Hua. Quality of mainly cultivated walnuts in Hubei Province of China at different harvest periods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1459-1468. |
| [4] | JIANG Zhenlan, CHEN Fuxun, LUO Shuangfei, LUO Yeqin, SHA Jinming. Inversion of soil total iron content using random forest model based on multi-spectral transformation and principle compoment analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1521-1532. |
| [5] | YUE Li, ZHUANG Hongmei, ZULIPIYA· Maimaiti, WANG Jiamin, MAO Hongyan, ZHANG Yingxian, NIGARY· Yadikar, YU Ming. Comprehensive evaluation of the texture quality of turnip succulent root based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071. |
| [6] | LIU Sitong, HOU Yu, PAN Jiaquan, ZHOU Huanan, CUI Liang, WAN Bo, YU Tao. Physiological response of sweetpotato to the low temperature and evaluation of cold tolerance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 767-778. |
| [7] | TAN Jingru, HU Qizan, YUE Zhichen, TAO Peng, LEI Juanli, LI Biyuan, ZHAO Yanting, ZANG Yunxiang. Comprehensive evaluation system for heat tolerance of seedling-edible Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp.) based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 288-299. |
| [8] | GUO Saisai, NIE Zhixing, FU Hongfei, WANG Tonglin, SHAO Zhiyong, WANG Hong, ZHENG Jirong. Phenotypic characters and SRAP genetic diversity analysis of 37 pepper germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 300-310. |
| [9] | PAN Zhihong, WEN Xueting, YANG Hua, LYU Wentao, ZHANG Junjie, XIAO Yingping. Study on developmental changes of amino acid spectrum in Muscovy duck muscle [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2010-2019. |
| [10] | DONG Lili, XU Zhihao, YAN Canlong, FAN Xiaoping, JIN Zelan, WANG Zhonghua. Molecular identification and genetic relationship of different breeding populations in Fritillaria thunbergii based on phenotype and molecular markers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1719-1730. |
| [11] | LI Yadong, LUO Xiaobo, PENG Xiao, YANG Guangqian, JIN Yueyue, ZU Guidong, TIAN Huan, ZHANG Wanping. Development of SNP and InDel markers in radish and their association with phenotypic characters [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1055-1066. |
| [12] | XUE Xianbin, JIA Qiong, CHEN Zhengfeng, LI Ruiyuan, CHEN Qingfu, SHI Taoxiong. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characteristics of recombinant inbred lines of Tartary buckwheat based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 748-759. |
| [13] | YE Lei, ZHANG Bo, YANG Xuezhen, LI Xiaolin, ZHANG Xiaoping, TAN Wei. Feasibility of Auricularia cornea cultivation with bamboo sawdust instead of wood sawdust and comprehensive evaluation of quality [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1416-1426. |
| [14] | LOU Qianqi, LIANG Yan. Quality analysis of five kinds of tomato germplasm resources with different fruit colors [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(3): 582-589. |
| [15] | ZHANG Hongmei, WANG Baojun, SHEN Yaqiang, CHENG Wangda. Response of yield and quality of high-quality japonica rice with different grain shapes to regulation of sowing date in northern Zhejiang, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(12): 2751-2762. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||