Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 814-823.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.04.18
• Biosystems Engineening • Previous Articles Next Articles
PENG Caiwang(
), ZHOU Ting, SUN Songlin(
), XIE Yelin, WEI Yuan
Received:2020-10-23
Online:2022-04-25
Published:2022-04-28
Contact:
SUN Songlin
CLC Number:
PENG Caiwang, ZHOU Ting, SUN Songlin, XIE Yelin, WEI Yuan. Calibration of parameters of black soldier fly in discrete method simulation based on response angle of particle heap[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 814-823.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.04.18
| 参数Parameters | 数值Values |
|---|---|
| 黑水虻泊松比 X1 Poisson’s ratio of black soldier fly | 0.20~0.40a |
| 黑水虻密度X2 Density of black soldier fly/(kg·m-3) | 320~380a |
| 黑水虻剪切模量 X3 Shear modulus of black soldier fly/MPa | 8~14a |
| 不锈钢泊松比 Poisson’s ratio of steel | 0.30b |
| 不锈钢密度 Density of steel/(kg·m-3) | 7860b |
| 不锈钢剪切模量 Shear modulus of steel/Pa | 7.90×1010b |
| 黑水虻间碰撞恢复系数 X4 Black soldier fly restitution coefficient | 0.10~0.30a |
| 黑水虻间静摩擦系数 X5 Black soldier fly static friction coefficient | 0.40~0.60a |
| 黑水虻间滚动摩擦系数 X6 Black soldier fly rolling friction coefficient | 0.30~0.50a |
| 黑水虻-不锈钢碰撞恢复系数 X7 Black soldier fly-steel restitution coefficient | 0.20~0.40a |
| 黑水虻-不锈钢静摩擦系数 X8 Black soldier fly-steel static friction coefficient | 0.50~0.70a |
| 黑水虻-不锈钢滚动摩擦系数 X9 Black soldier fly-steel rolling friction coefficient | 0.35~0.55a |
| 黑水虻表面能 X10 Black soldier fly surface energy/(J·m-2) | 0.05~0.65a |
Table 1 Setting of simulation parameters
| 参数Parameters | 数值Values |
|---|---|
| 黑水虻泊松比 X1 Poisson’s ratio of black soldier fly | 0.20~0.40a |
| 黑水虻密度X2 Density of black soldier fly/(kg·m-3) | 320~380a |
| 黑水虻剪切模量 X3 Shear modulus of black soldier fly/MPa | 8~14a |
| 不锈钢泊松比 Poisson’s ratio of steel | 0.30b |
| 不锈钢密度 Density of steel/(kg·m-3) | 7860b |
| 不锈钢剪切模量 Shear modulus of steel/Pa | 7.90×1010b |
| 黑水虻间碰撞恢复系数 X4 Black soldier fly restitution coefficient | 0.10~0.30a |
| 黑水虻间静摩擦系数 X5 Black soldier fly static friction coefficient | 0.40~0.60a |
| 黑水虻间滚动摩擦系数 X6 Black soldier fly rolling friction coefficient | 0.30~0.50a |
| 黑水虻-不锈钢碰撞恢复系数 X7 Black soldier fly-steel restitution coefficient | 0.20~0.40a |
| 黑水虻-不锈钢静摩擦系数 X8 Black soldier fly-steel static friction coefficient | 0.50~0.70a |
| 黑水虻-不锈钢滚动摩擦系数 X9 Black soldier fly-steel rolling friction coefficient | 0.35~0.55a |
| 黑水虻表面能 X10 Black soldier fly surface energy/(J·m-2) | 0.05~0.65a |
| 序号 No. | 参数Parameters | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 45.25 |
| 2 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 54.02 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 43.02 |
| 4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 45.41 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 53.65 |
| 6 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 37.70 |
| 7 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 40.74 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 38.54 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 39.48 |
| 10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 38.89 |
| 11 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 39.94 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 38.19 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.58 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.02 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.15 |
Table 2 Design and results of Plackett-Burman test
| 序号 No. | 参数Parameters | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 45.25 |
| 2 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 54.02 |
| 3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 43.02 |
| 4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 45.41 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 53.65 |
| 6 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 37.70 |
| 7 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 40.74 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 38.54 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 39.48 |
| 10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 38.89 |
| 11 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 39.94 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 38.19 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.58 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.02 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.15 |
| 参数 Parameters | 标准化效应 Stdized effects | 均方和 Sum of mean squares | 贡献度/% Contribution degree | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | -3.48 | 36.37 | 10.08 | 0.052 9 |
| X2 | 1.39 | 5.81 | 1.61 | 0.337 8 |
| X3 | 3.86 | 44.74 | 12.39 | 0.039 2 |
| X4 | -2.40 | 17.30 | 4.79 | 0.133 7 |
| X5 | 7.20 | 155.45 | 43.07 | 0.004 9 |
| X6 | 4.92 | 72.67 | 20.13 | 0.018 3 |
| X7 | 0.98 | 2.91 | 0.81 | 0.484 3 |
| X8 | 0.94 | 2.68 | 0.74 | 0.501 1 |
| X9 | -0.90 | 2.42 | 0.67 | 0.521 3 |
| X10 | -0.57 | 0.97 | 0.27 | 0.679 8 |
Table 3 Variance analysis of Plackett-Burman test results
| 参数 Parameters | 标准化效应 Stdized effects | 均方和 Sum of mean squares | 贡献度/% Contribution degree | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | -3.48 | 36.37 | 10.08 | 0.052 9 |
| X2 | 1.39 | 5.81 | 1.61 | 0.337 8 |
| X3 | 3.86 | 44.74 | 12.39 | 0.039 2 |
| X4 | -2.40 | 17.30 | 4.79 | 0.133 7 |
| X5 | 7.20 | 155.45 | 43.07 | 0.004 9 |
| X6 | 4.92 | 72.67 | 20.13 | 0.018 3 |
| X7 | 0.98 | 2.91 | 0.81 | 0.484 3 |
| X8 | 0.94 | 2.68 | 0.74 | 0.501 1 |
| X9 | -0.90 | 2.42 | 0.67 | 0.521 3 |
| X10 | -0.57 | 0.97 | 0.27 | 0.679 8 |
| 序号 No. | 参数 Parameters | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) | 相对误差 Relative error/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X3/MPa | X5 | X6 | |||
| 1 | 7.0 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 31.73 | 8.4 |
| 2 | 8.5 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 34.54 | 0.3 |
| 3 | 10 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 37.44 | 8.0 |
| 4 | 11.5 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 40.06 | 15.6 |
| 5 | 13.0 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 43.46 | 25.4 |
| 6 | 14.5 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 45.47 | 31.2 |
Table 4 Design and results of steepest climbing test
| 序号 No. | 参数 Parameters | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) | 相对误差 Relative error/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X3/MPa | X5 | X6 | |||
| 1 | 7.0 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 31.73 | 8.4 |
| 2 | 8.5 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 34.54 | 0.3 |
| 3 | 10 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 37.44 | 8.0 |
| 4 | 11.5 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 40.06 | 15.6 |
| 5 | 13.0 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 43.46 | 25.4 |
| 6 | 14.5 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 45.47 | 31.2 |
| 水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| X3/MPa | X5 | X6 | |
| -1.682 | 6.0 | 0.32 | 0.22 |
| -1 | 7.0 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| 0 | 8.5 | 0.40 | 0.30 |
| 1 | 10.0 | 0.45 | 0.35 |
| 1.682 | 11.0 | 0.48 | 0.38 |
Table 5 Experiment factors and codes
| 水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| X3/MPa | X5 | X6 | |
| -1.682 | 6.0 | 0.32 | 0.22 |
| -1 | 7.0 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| 0 | 8.5 | 0.40 | 0.30 |
| 1 | 10.0 | 0.45 | 0.35 |
| 1.682 | 11.0 | 0.48 | 0.38 |
| 序号 No. | x3 | x5 | x6 | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 31.56 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 32.27 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 35.55 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 35.13 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 31.40 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 33.91 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 36.25 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 37.50 |
| 9 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 33.38 |
| 10 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 | 34.95 |
| 11 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 30.45 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 | 36.95 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 34.27 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 | 35.05 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.84 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.11 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.52 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.83 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.34 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.63 |
Table 6 Experiment scheme and results
| 序号 No. | x3 | x5 | x6 | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 31.56 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 32.27 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 35.55 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 35.13 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 31.40 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 33.91 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 36.25 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 37.50 |
| 9 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 33.38 |
| 10 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 | 34.95 |
| 11 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 30.45 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 | 36.95 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 34.27 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 | 35.05 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.84 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.11 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.52 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.83 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.34 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.63 |
| 方差来源 Soruce of variation | 平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 65.07 | 9 | 7.23 | <0.000 1 |
| x3 | 3.28 | 1 | 3.28 | 0.002 2 |
| x5 | 50.35 | 1 | 50.35 | <0.000 1 |
| x6 | 2.52 | 1 | 2.52 | 0.005 1 |
| x3x5 | 0.71 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.086 0 |
| x3x6 | 1.51 | 1 | 1.51 | 0.020 0 |
| x5x6 | 0.32 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.233 9 |
| | 2.15 | 1 | 2.15 | 0.008 0 |
| | 0.71 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.087 2 |
| | 4.54 | 1 | 4.54 | 0.000 7 |
| 残差Residual | 1.97 | 10 | 0.20 | |
| 失拟Lack of fit | 0.39 | 5 | 0.078 | 0.923 7 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 1.58 | 5 | 0.32 | |
| 总和Sum | 67.04 | 19 |
Table 7 Variance analysis of regression equation
| 方差来源 Soruce of variation | 平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 65.07 | 9 | 7.23 | <0.000 1 |
| x3 | 3.28 | 1 | 3.28 | 0.002 2 |
| x5 | 50.35 | 1 | 50.35 | <0.000 1 |
| x6 | 2.52 | 1 | 2.52 | 0.005 1 |
| x3x5 | 0.71 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.086 0 |
| x3x6 | 1.51 | 1 | 1.51 | 0.020 0 |
| x5x6 | 0.32 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.233 9 |
| | 2.15 | 1 | 2.15 | 0.008 0 |
| | 0.71 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.087 2 |
| | 4.54 | 1 | 4.54 | 0.000 7 |
| 残差Residual | 1.97 | 10 | 0.20 | |
| 失拟Lack of fit | 0.39 | 5 | 0.078 | 0.923 7 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 1.58 | 5 | 0.32 | |
| 总和Sum | 67.04 | 19 |
| [1] | 周晶, 青平. 规模化养殖对中国生猪粪便污染的影响研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(8): 920-924. |
| ZHOU J, QING P. Study on impact of scaled breeding on pig manure pollution in China[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2017, 39(8): 920-924. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 王天琪, 章萍, 周文斌. 养猪废水中氮磷及重金属的处理方法[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2013, 34(11): 85-88. |
| WANG T Q, ZHANG P, ZHOU W B. Treatments of nitrogen, phosphorus and heavy metals in swine wastewater[J]. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2013, 34(11): 85-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 喻国辉, 陈燕红, 喻子牛, 等. 黑水虻幼虫和预蛹的饲料价值研究进展[J]. 昆虫知识, 2009, 46(1): 41-45. |
| YU G H, CHEN Y H, YU Z N, et al. Research progression on the larvae and prepupae of black soldier fly Hermetia illucens used as animal feedstuff[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2009, 46(1): 41-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 柴志强, 王付彬, 郭明昉, 等. 水虻科昆虫及其资源化利用研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(10): 182-185. |
| CHAI Z Q, WANG F B, GUO M F, et al. Research of Stratiomyidae and its utilization[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 39(10): 182-185. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 陈杰, 邝哲师, 肖明, 等. 畜禽粪便处理的优质昆虫黑水虻[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(24): 8180-8182. |
| CHEN J, KUANG Z S, XIAO M, et al. High quality insect for animal manure treatment: Hermetia illucens[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(24): 8180-8182. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 马加康, 郭浩然, 王立新. 新鲜鸭粪对黑水虻幼虫生长发育及粪便转化率的影响[J]. 安徽科技学院学报, 2016, 30(1): 12-18. |
| MA J K, GUO H R, WANG L X. The influences of the fresh duck manure to blackwater fly larvae growth and rate of waste conversion[J]. Journal of Anhui Science and Technology University, 2016, 30(1): 12-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 王小波, 李景龙, 尚东维, 等. Cu2+、Zn2+、Cd2+对黑水虻幼虫生长的影响及在虫体和虫粪的积累[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(2): 387-393. |
| WANG X B, LI J L, SHANG D W, et al. Effect of Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+ on the growth of Hermetia illucens larvae and accumulation in larvae and feces[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2019, 41(2): 387-393. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 徐齐云, 龙镜池, 叶明强, 等. 黑水虻幼虫的发育速率及食物转化率研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(4): 561-564. |
| XU Q Y, LONG J C, YE M Q, et al. Development rate and food conversion efficiency of black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2014, 36(4): 561-564. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] |
XIAO X W, TAN Y Q, ZHANG H, et al. Experimental and DEM studies on the particle mixing performance in rotating drums: effect of area ratio[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 314: 182-194.
DOI URL |
| [10] | GHAZAVI M, HOSSEINI M, MOLLANOURI M. A comparison between angle of repose and friction angle of sand[C]// The 12th International Conference for International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), 2008. |
| [11] | FRIEDMAN S P, ROBINSON D A. Particle shape characterization using angle of repose measurements for predicting the effective permittivity and electrical conductivity of saturated granular media[J]. Water Resources Research, 2002, 38(11): 18-1-18-11. |
| [12] | FIELKE J M, UCGUL M, SAUNDERS C. Discrete element modeling of soil-implement interaction considering soil plasticity, cohesion and adhesion[C]// American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2013. |
| [13] | 徐泳, 孙其诚, 张凌, 等. 颗粒离散元法研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2003,(2): 251-260. |
| XU Y, SUN Q C, ZHANG L, et al. Advances in discrete element methods for particulate materials[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2003,(2): 251-260. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 王泳嘉, 邢纪波. 离散单元法同拉格朗日元法及其在岩土力学中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 1995, 16(2): 1-14. |
| WANG Y J, XING J B. Discrete element method and Lagrangian element method and their applications in geomechanics[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 1995, 16(2): 1-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 于建群, 付宏, 李红, 等. 离散元法及其在农业机械工作部件研究与设计中的应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(5): 1-6. |
| YU J Q, FU H, LI H, et al. Application of discrete element method to research and design of working parts of agricultural machines[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(5): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 马帅, 徐丽明, 袁全春, 等. 葡萄藤防寒土与清土部件相互作用的离散元仿真参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(1): 40-49. |
| MA S, XU L M, YUAN Q C, et al. Calibration of discrete element simulation parameters of grapevine antifreezing soil and its interaction with soil-cleaning components[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(1): 40-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 邢洁洁, 张锐, 吴鹏, 等. 海南热区砖红壤颗粒离散元仿真模型参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5): 158-166. |
| XING J J, ZHANG R, WU P, et al. Parameter calibration of discrete element simulation model for latosol particles in hot areas of Hainan Province[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(5): 158-166. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 袁全春, 徐丽明, 邢洁洁, 等. 机施有机肥散体颗粒离散元模型参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(18): 21-27. |
| YUAN Q C, XU L M, XING J J, et al. Parameter calibration of discrete element model of organic fertilizer particles for mechanical fertilization[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(18): 21-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 廖宜涛, 廖庆喜, 周宇, 等. 饲料油菜薹期收获茎秆破碎离散元仿真参数标定[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(6): 73-82. |
| LIAO Y T, LIAO Q X, ZHOU Y, et al. Parameters calibration of discrete element model of fodder rape crop harvest in bolting stage[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(6): 73-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] |
LENAERTS B, AERTSEN T, TIJSKENS E, et al. Simulation of grain-straw separation by Discrete Element Modeling with bendable straw particles[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2014, 101: 24-33.
DOI URL |
| [21] | 王国强, 郝万军, 王继新. 离散单元法及其在EDEM上的实践[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2010. |
| [22] | 林嘉聪, 罗帅, 袁巧霞, 等. 不同含水率蚯蚓粪颗粒物料流动性研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(9): 221-227. |
| LIN J C, LUO S, YUAN Q X, et al. Flow properties of vermicompost particle with different moisture contents[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(9): 221-227. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 徐莉. 3-DOF蛆料分离多维振动筛筛分特性影响因素的分析与试验[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019. |
| XU L. Analysis and tests of screening characteristics influencing factors of 3-DOF multi-dimensional vibrating screen for fly maggots and sputum[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 蔡静. 基于DEM的蛆粪混合物动力学与多维振动筛的优化设计[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2018. |
| CAI J. Dynamics of maggots and manure based on DEM and optimal design of the multi-dimensional sieving machine[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 汪志焕. 蝇蛆处理畜禽粪便中蛆料分离多维振动筛的设计[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2016. |
| WANG Z H. Design of the multidimensional maggots sieving machine among maggots handling livestock excrements[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 黄友良, 欧玲利. 黑水虻资源化利用研究[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2019, 37(7): 48-50. |
| HUANG Y L, OU L L. Study on the resource utilization of Tabanus nigra[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2019, 37(7): 48-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 吕丰喆. 蝇蛆对粪中养分的转化及蝇蛆对粪中养分利用率的研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016. |
| LÜ F Z. Study of maggot on nutrient transformation and manure on nutrient utilization[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 张锐, 韩佃雷, 吉巧丽, 等. 离散元模拟中沙土参数标定方法研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(3): 49-56. |
| ZHANG R, HAN D L, JI Q L, et al. Calibration methods of sandy soil parameters in simulation of discrete element method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(3): 49-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 刘文政, 何进, 李洪文, 等. 基于离散元的微型马铃薯仿真参数标定[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(5): 125-135. |
| LIU W Z, HE J, LI H W, et al. Calibration of simulation parameters for potato minituber based on EDEM[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(5): 125-135. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 石林榕, 赵武云, 孙伟. 基于离散元的西北旱区农田土壤颗粒接触模型和参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(21): 181-187. |
| SHI L R, ZHAO W Y, SUN W. Parameter calibration of soil particles contact model of farmland soil in northwest arid region based on discrete element method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(21): 181-187. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 胡国明. 颗粒系统的离散元素法分析仿真: 离散元素法的工业应用与EDEM软件简介[M]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社, 2010. |
| [1] | REN Ning, YU Guohong, ZHENG Hang, CHEN Zhidong. Parameter calibration of tea garden soil based on discrete element method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1353-1359. |
| [2] | ZHOU Maocuo, LU Jianxiong, GUO Xiaonong, FENG Yulan, CHAI Weiwei, GAO Pengfei. Optimization of quinoa straw fermentation process based on response surface methodology [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2020-2030. |
| [3] | XIONG Houquan, JIANG Jie. Discrete element parameter calibration and testing of interaction between yellow lateritic red soil and trenching components [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1400-1412. |
| [4] | KONG De, YE Ziran, TAN Xiangfeng, DAI Mengdi, ZHAO Xianliang, KONG Dedong. Measurement of physical contact parameters and discrete element simulation calibration of lettuce seeds [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 932-942. |
| [5] | XIN Yapeng, WANG Lin, SHI Yinyan, WANG Xiaochan, WU Changwei, LIU Hui. Numerical simulation and optimization of key structure for centrifugal variable fertilizer spreader [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1452-1461. |
| [6] | LYU Jing, WU Zhiyong, GUO Xiaonong, FENG Yulan, LU Jianxiong, CHAI Weiwei. Optimization of fermented quinoa straw with lactic acid bacteria by response surface methodology [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1866-1876. |
| [7] | LIU Mingyong, HU Chenglong, XIE Bolin. Simulation and optimization analysis and experiment of split plough based on discrete element method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2542-2552. |
| [8] | YANG Yeshuang, ZHANG Yingping, CHEN Yifan, ZHANG Jin, LI Huanhuan, CHEN Lihong, TANG Honggang, GAO Bin. Optimization of formulation of reconstituted liquid egg by response surface methodology [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 153-162. |
| [9] | QIN Kuan, LIANG Xiaolong, CAO Chengmao, FANG Liangfei, WU Zhengmin, GE Jun. Design and experiment of tea garden energy-saving ditching blade [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1320-1328. |
| [10] | WANG Feng, ZHANG Fengwei, DAI Fei, ZHANG Luhai, ZHAO Wei, YANG Xiaoping. Design and experiment of double layer flat screen type Pinellia ternate harvester [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1946-1955. |
| [11] | LI Weining, BAI Xuanbing, LI Bing. Optimization of structural parameters of drum type tea re-dryer [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 348-358. |
| [12] | YANG Zhi, LI Wenyi, GAO Yuntao, XIONG Huabin, CHEN Yijian, YANG Huijuan. Optimization of extraction process of total flavonoids from Acerola cherry by response surface methodology and their antioxidant activities [J]. , 2020, 32(10): 1866-1872. |
| [13] | WEN Huiping, XIAO Jianzhong, LEI Weimin, JI Jiana. Optimization of extraction process of total flavonoids from Chimonanthus salicifolius S.Y.H by HPLC combined with response surface methodology and its antibacterial activity [J]. , 2018, 30(2): 298-306. |
| [14] | WANG Chuyan, CHENG Junwen, ZHU Chao. Optimization of extracellular polysaccharide production from Fructificatio amaurodermatis Rudae by liquid submerged fermentation and its antioxidant activity [J]. , 2018, 30(11): 1938-1945. |
| [15] | JIN Li\|li1,2,JI Chang\|ying1,2,*,FANG Hui\|min1,2, TAN Ying1,2. Numerical simulation of mixing process of fertilizer particles in continuous mixer of variable rate fertilizer applicator [J]. , 2015, 27(2): 261-. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||