Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 41-49.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.06
• Animal Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Xiaofan1(), WU Tao1, WEI Yuming2, YANG Farong2, CHEN Guoshun1, JIAO Ting3, CAI Yuan1,*(
), ZHAO Shengguo1
Received:
2021-04-29
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-02-05
Contact:
CAI Yuan
CLC Number:
JIANG Xiaofan, WU Tao, WEI Yuming, YANG Farong, CHEN Guoshun, JIAO Ting, CAI Yuan, ZHAO Shengguo. Effects of dietary oregano essential oil on growth performance, slaughter performance, organ indexes and intestinal morphology of Luhua chickens[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(1): 41-49.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.01.06
处理 | 成分Ingredients | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
玉米 Corn | 次粉 Wheat middling | 藜麦 Quinoa seeds | 去皮豆粕 Soybean meal | 石粉 Limestone | 磷酸氢钙 CaHPO4 | 饲料级 氯化钠 NaCl | 1%复合 预混料 1% pemix | 牛至精油 Oregano oil | 沸石粉 Zeolite powder | |
Q8 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0 | 0.300 |
QO50 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.295 |
QO100 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.010 | 0.290 |
QO150 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.015 | 0.285 |
Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of experiment diets (DM basis) %
处理 | 成分Ingredients | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
玉米 Corn | 次粉 Wheat middling | 藜麦 Quinoa seeds | 去皮豆粕 Soybean meal | 石粉 Limestone | 磷酸氢钙 CaHPO4 | 饲料级 氯化钠 NaCl | 1%复合 预混料 1% pemix | 牛至精油 Oregano oil | 沸石粉 Zeolite powder | |
Q8 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0 | 0.300 |
QO50 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.295 |
QO100 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.010 | 0.290 |
QO150 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.015 | 0.285 |
处理 | 代谢能 Metabolic energy/ (MJ·kg-1) | 营养水平Nutrient levels/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质 Dry matter | 粗蛋白质 Crude Protein | 粗纤维 Crude fiber | 粗脂肪 EE | 钙 Ca | TP | AP | Lys | Met | Met+Cys | Thr | Trp | ||
Q8 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
QO50 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
QO100 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
QO150 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
Table 2 Nutrient levels of experiment diets (DM basis)
处理 | 代谢能 Metabolic energy/ (MJ·kg-1) | 营养水平Nutrient levels/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质 Dry matter | 粗蛋白质 Crude Protein | 粗纤维 Crude fiber | 粗脂肪 EE | 钙 Ca | TP | AP | Lys | Met | Met+Cys | Thr | Trp | ||
Q8 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
QO50 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
QO100 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
QO150 | 12.4 | 84.66 | 16.25 | 2.74 | 3.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.2 | 0.84 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.18 |
处理 Treatment | 项目Items | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初始体重(49日龄) Initial body weight/g | 终末体重(121日龄) Final body weight/g | 平均日增重 Average daily gain/ (g·d-1) | 平均日采食量 Average daily feed intake/(g·d-1) | 料重比 F/G | ||
Q8 | 1 486.13±77.82 a | 2 787.04±176.46 a | 20.33±2.30 a | 106.55±4.07 a | 4.85±0.37 a | |
QO50 | 1 473.64±90.37 a | 2 790.37±151.75 a | 20.87±1.88 a | 105.97±4.30 a | 4.78±0.35 a | |
QO100 | 1 488.78±76.39 a | 2 797.04±192.59 a | 21.38±1.92 a | 106.47±4.36 a | 4.74±0.34 a | |
QO150 | 1 466.44±99.48 a | 2 714.44±205.36 a | 20.20±1.93 a | 104.70±4.47 a | 4.76±0.31 a | |
P值 | 处理Treatment | 0.753 | 0.308 | 0.189 | 0.370 | 0.800 |
P value | 线性Linear | 0.555 | 0.182 | 0.869 | 0.176 | 0.408 |
二次Quadratic | 0.804 | 0.195 | 0.134 | 0.311 | 0.602 |
Table 3 Effects of oregano oil on growth performance of Luhua chicken
处理 Treatment | 项目Items | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初始体重(49日龄) Initial body weight/g | 终末体重(121日龄) Final body weight/g | 平均日增重 Average daily gain/ (g·d-1) | 平均日采食量 Average daily feed intake/(g·d-1) | 料重比 F/G | ||
Q8 | 1 486.13±77.82 a | 2 787.04±176.46 a | 20.33±2.30 a | 106.55±4.07 a | 4.85±0.37 a | |
QO50 | 1 473.64±90.37 a | 2 790.37±151.75 a | 20.87±1.88 a | 105.97±4.30 a | 4.78±0.35 a | |
QO100 | 1 488.78±76.39 a | 2 797.04±192.59 a | 21.38±1.92 a | 106.47±4.36 a | 4.74±0.34 a | |
QO150 | 1 466.44±99.48 a | 2 714.44±205.36 a | 20.20±1.93 a | 104.70±4.47 a | 4.76±0.31 a | |
P值 | 处理Treatment | 0.753 | 0.308 | 0.189 | 0.370 | 0.800 |
P value | 线性Linear | 0.555 | 0.182 | 0.869 | 0.176 | 0.408 |
二次Quadratic | 0.804 | 0.195 | 0.134 | 0.311 | 0.602 |
处理 Treatment | 活体重 Live weight/g | 屠体重 Slaughte- ring weight/g | 半净膛重 Half-evis- cerated weight/g | 全净膛重 All evis- cerated weight/g | 腿肌重 Leg muscle weight/g | 胸肌重 Chest muscle weight/g | 腹脂重 Abdominal fat weight/g | 屠宰率 Slaughter percentage /% | 半净膛率 Half-evisce- rated per- centage/% | 全净膛率 Eviscerated percentage /% | 胸肌率 Pectoral muscle per- centage/% | 腿肌率 Leg muscle percentage /% | 腹脂率 Abdominal fat percent- age/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q8 | 2 890.00±92.09 a | 2 573.12±121.04 a | 2 339.45±89.21 b | 1 994.68±76.47 a | 470.94±35.80 a | 345.79±24.31 b | 53.40±1.12 b | 89.02±2.35 b | 80.96±2.02 b | 69.02±1.56 b | 16.34±2.01 b | 23.69±2.66 a | 2.80±0.06 a | |
QO50 | 2 898.33±64.01 a | 2 646.57±71.14 a | 2 466.75±59.35 a | 2 088.39±60.84 a | 509.22±33.66 a | 394.91±28.46 a | 58.15±1.83 a | 92.06±0.59 a | 85.15±2.87 a | 72.09±2.87 a | 18.90±1.01 a | 24.39±1.51 a | 2.85±0.13 a | |
QO100 | 2 898.33±86.58 a | 2 664.58±74.74 a | 2 454.39±66.34 a | 2 075.13±59.41 a | 483.40±42.86 a | 386.50±13.83 a | 58.61±1.92 a | 91.94±0.32 a | 84.70±1.61 a | 71.61±1.57 a | 18.64±0.77 a | 24.14±1.52 a | 2.82±0.06 a | |
QO150 | 2 805.00±131.11 a | 2 570.25±116.51 a | 2 403.82±123.38 ab | 2 035.69±117.67 a | 458.12±33.66 a | 363.97±26.10 ab | 56.18±3.00 a | 91.64±0.44 a | 85.68±0.98 a | 72.55±1.17 a | 17.88±0.80 ab | 22.50±0.95 a | 2.76±0.04 a | |
P值 | 处理 | 0.293 | 0.25 | 0.032 | 0.222 | 0.13 | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.02 | 0.017 | 0.305 | 0.581 |
P value | Treatment | |||||||||||||
线性Linear | 0.161 | 0.961 | 0.317 | 0.492 | 0.382 | 0.545 | 0.261 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.172 | 0.248 | 0.54 | |
二次 | 0.167 | 0.128 | 0.039 | 0.123 | 0.089 | 0.006 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.157 | 0.375 | |
Quadratic |
Table 4 Effects of oregano oil on slaughter performance of Luhua chickens
处理 Treatment | 活体重 Live weight/g | 屠体重 Slaughte- ring weight/g | 半净膛重 Half-evis- cerated weight/g | 全净膛重 All evis- cerated weight/g | 腿肌重 Leg muscle weight/g | 胸肌重 Chest muscle weight/g | 腹脂重 Abdominal fat weight/g | 屠宰率 Slaughter percentage /% | 半净膛率 Half-evisce- rated per- centage/% | 全净膛率 Eviscerated percentage /% | 胸肌率 Pectoral muscle per- centage/% | 腿肌率 Leg muscle percentage /% | 腹脂率 Abdominal fat percent- age/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q8 | 2 890.00±92.09 a | 2 573.12±121.04 a | 2 339.45±89.21 b | 1 994.68±76.47 a | 470.94±35.80 a | 345.79±24.31 b | 53.40±1.12 b | 89.02±2.35 b | 80.96±2.02 b | 69.02±1.56 b | 16.34±2.01 b | 23.69±2.66 a | 2.80±0.06 a | |
QO50 | 2 898.33±64.01 a | 2 646.57±71.14 a | 2 466.75±59.35 a | 2 088.39±60.84 a | 509.22±33.66 a | 394.91±28.46 a | 58.15±1.83 a | 92.06±0.59 a | 85.15±2.87 a | 72.09±2.87 a | 18.90±1.01 a | 24.39±1.51 a | 2.85±0.13 a | |
QO100 | 2 898.33±86.58 a | 2 664.58±74.74 a | 2 454.39±66.34 a | 2 075.13±59.41 a | 483.40±42.86 a | 386.50±13.83 a | 58.61±1.92 a | 91.94±0.32 a | 84.70±1.61 a | 71.61±1.57 a | 18.64±0.77 a | 24.14±1.52 a | 2.82±0.06 a | |
QO150 | 2 805.00±131.11 a | 2 570.25±116.51 a | 2 403.82±123.38 ab | 2 035.69±117.67 a | 458.12±33.66 a | 363.97±26.10 ab | 56.18±3.00 a | 91.64±0.44 a | 85.68±0.98 a | 72.55±1.17 a | 17.88±0.80 ab | 22.50±0.95 a | 2.76±0.04 a | |
P值 | 处理 | 0.293 | 0.25 | 0.032 | 0.222 | 0.13 | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.02 | 0.017 | 0.305 | 0.581 |
P value | Treatment | |||||||||||||
线性Linear | 0.161 | 0.961 | 0.317 | 0.492 | 0.382 | 0.545 | 0.261 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.172 | 0.248 | 0.54 | |
二次 | 0.167 | 0.128 | 0.039 | 0.123 | 0.089 | 0.006 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.157 | 0.375 | |
Quadratic |
处理 Treatment | 心指数 Cardiac index | 肝指数 Liver index | 肺指数 Lungs index | 肾指数 Kidney index | 胰腺指数 Pancreas index | 腺胃指数 Gland stomach index | 肌胃指数 Gizzard index | 脾脏指数 Spleen index | 法氏囊指数 Bursa of Fabricius index | 胸腺指数 Thymus index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q8 | 0.33±0.02 a | 1.73±0.40 a | 0.47±0.14 a | 0.14±0.03 a | 0.17±0.01 a | 0.19±0.02 b | 1.20±0.09 a | 0.13±0.03 ab | 0.12±0.02 a | 0.22±0.06 a | |
QO50 | 0.33±0.03 a | 1.57±0.20 a | 0.38±0.02 a | 0.14±0.02 a | 0.17±0.02 ab | 0.23±0.02 a | 1.25±0.11 a | 0.16±0.02 a | 0.09±0.01 a | 0.16±0.02 a | |
QO100 | 0.32±0.04 a | 1.66±0.26 a | 0.38±0.04 a | 0.17±0.04 a | 0.14±0.03 bc | 0.23±0.03 a | 1.30±0.15 a | 0.14±0.03 ab | 0.11±0.03 a | 0.18±0.04 a | |
QO150 | 0.34±0.04 a | 1.73±0.44 a | 0.36±0.04 a | 0.13±0.01 a | 0.13±0.02 c | 0.24±0.02 a | 1.32±0.20 a | 0.12±0.01 b | 0.10±0.02 a | 0.19±0.04 a | |
P值 | 处理Treatment | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.132 | 0.109 | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.447 | 0.099 | 0.187 | 0.182 |
Pvalue | 线性Linear | 0.517 | 0.923 | 0.038 | 0.976 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.102 | 0.235 | 0.325 | 0.277 |
二次Quadratic | 0.763 | 0.767 | 0.069 | 0.278 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 0.261 | 0.096 | 0.402 | 0.119 |
Table 5 Effects of oregano oilon organ index of Luhua chickens
处理 Treatment | 心指数 Cardiac index | 肝指数 Liver index | 肺指数 Lungs index | 肾指数 Kidney index | 胰腺指数 Pancreas index | 腺胃指数 Gland stomach index | 肌胃指数 Gizzard index | 脾脏指数 Spleen index | 法氏囊指数 Bursa of Fabricius index | 胸腺指数 Thymus index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q8 | 0.33±0.02 a | 1.73±0.40 a | 0.47±0.14 a | 0.14±0.03 a | 0.17±0.01 a | 0.19±0.02 b | 1.20±0.09 a | 0.13±0.03 ab | 0.12±0.02 a | 0.22±0.06 a | |
QO50 | 0.33±0.03 a | 1.57±0.20 a | 0.38±0.02 a | 0.14±0.02 a | 0.17±0.02 ab | 0.23±0.02 a | 1.25±0.11 a | 0.16±0.02 a | 0.09±0.01 a | 0.16±0.02 a | |
QO100 | 0.32±0.04 a | 1.66±0.26 a | 0.38±0.04 a | 0.17±0.04 a | 0.14±0.03 bc | 0.23±0.03 a | 1.30±0.15 a | 0.14±0.03 ab | 0.11±0.03 a | 0.18±0.04 a | |
QO150 | 0.34±0.04 a | 1.73±0.44 a | 0.36±0.04 a | 0.13±0.01 a | 0.13±0.02 c | 0.24±0.02 a | 1.32±0.20 a | 0.12±0.01 b | 0.10±0.02 a | 0.19±0.04 a | |
P值 | 处理Treatment | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.132 | 0.109 | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.447 | 0.099 | 0.187 | 0.182 |
Pvalue | 线性Linear | 0.517 | 0.923 | 0.038 | 0.976 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.102 | 0.235 | 0.325 | 0.277 |
二次Quadratic | 0.763 | 0.767 | 0.069 | 0.278 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 0.261 | 0.096 | 0.402 | 0.119 |
处理 Treatment | 十二指肠Duodenum | 空肠Jejunum | 回肠Ileal | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绒毛高度 Villus height/μm | 隐窝深度 Crypt depth/μm | 绒毛高度/ 隐窝深度 V/C | 绒毛高度 Villus height/μm | 隐窝深度 Crypt depth/μm | 绒毛高度/ 隐窝深度 V/C | 绒毛高度 Villus height/μm | 隐窝深度 Crypt depth/μm | 绒毛高度/ 隐窝深度 V/C | ||
Q8 | 1272.79±182.78b | 175.79±9.28 d | 7.52±0.81 a | 1120.73±77.11 a | 153.62±11.84 a | 7.53±0.59 a | 833.59±58.24 a | 138.27±14.62 a | 6.11±0.54 a | |
QO50 | 1195.92±52.33c | 197.34±13.97 b | 6.17±0.52 c | 869.33±67.33 d | 157.57±8.81 a | 5.43±0.54 d | 539.66±56.83 d | 129.88±8.31 b | 4.18±0.51 d | |
QO100 | 1239.18±86.00bc | 186.22±8.59 c | 6.84±0.72 b | 985.98±72.84 b | 145.77±12.46 b | 6.77±0.84 b | 610.22±36.27 c | 129.38±11.41 b | 4.65±0.56 c | |
QO150 | 1450.96±82.04a | 208.54±20.54 a | 6.89±0.53 b | 938.54±57.44 c | 146.78±12.29 b | 6.42±0.66 c | 728.91±41.54 b | 133.64±12.27 ab | 5.49±0.61 b | |
P值 | 处理Treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.024 | <0.001 |
P value | 线性Linear | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.552 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.126 | 0.066 |
二次Quadratic | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0 |
Table 6 Effects of oregano oil on intestinal mucosal morphology of Luhua chickens
处理 Treatment | 十二指肠Duodenum | 空肠Jejunum | 回肠Ileal | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绒毛高度 Villus height/μm | 隐窝深度 Crypt depth/μm | 绒毛高度/ 隐窝深度 V/C | 绒毛高度 Villus height/μm | 隐窝深度 Crypt depth/μm | 绒毛高度/ 隐窝深度 V/C | 绒毛高度 Villus height/μm | 隐窝深度 Crypt depth/μm | 绒毛高度/ 隐窝深度 V/C | ||
Q8 | 1272.79±182.78b | 175.79±9.28 d | 7.52±0.81 a | 1120.73±77.11 a | 153.62±11.84 a | 7.53±0.59 a | 833.59±58.24 a | 138.27±14.62 a | 6.11±0.54 a | |
QO50 | 1195.92±52.33c | 197.34±13.97 b | 6.17±0.52 c | 869.33±67.33 d | 157.57±8.81 a | 5.43±0.54 d | 539.66±56.83 d | 129.88±8.31 b | 4.18±0.51 d | |
QO100 | 1239.18±86.00bc | 186.22±8.59 c | 6.84±0.72 b | 985.98±72.84 b | 145.77±12.46 b | 6.77±0.84 b | 610.22±36.27 c | 129.38±11.41 b | 4.65±0.56 c | |
QO150 | 1450.96±82.04a | 208.54±20.54 a | 6.89±0.53 b | 938.54±57.44 c | 146.78±12.29 b | 6.42±0.66 c | 728.91±41.54 b | 133.64±12.27 ab | 5.49±0.61 b | |
P值 | 处理Treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.024 | <0.001 |
P value | 线性Linear | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.552 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.126 | 0.066 |
二次Quadratic | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0 |
[1] | 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中华人民共和国农业农村部公告第285号[EB/OL].(2020-03-26)[2021-04-29].http://www.moa.gov.cn/gk/tzgg_1/gg/202003/t20200326_6340015.htm. |
[2] |
HOU H, ZHANG X, ZHAO T, et al. Effects of Origanum vulgare essential oil and its two main components, carvacrol and thymol, on the plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8(2): e9626.
DOI URL |
[3] | 韩飞, 陈泣, 舒积成, 等. 湖北产牛至药材不同提取部位挥发油GC-MS分析[J]. 中草药, 2015, 46(13): 1887-1891. |
HAN F, CHEN Q, SHU JC, et al. GC-MS analysis on volatile oil extracted from different parts of Origanum vulgare growing in Hubei Province[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2015, 46(13): 1887-1891. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] |
HONG J C, STEINER T, AUFY A, et al. Effects of supplemental essential oil on growth performance, lipid metabolites and immunity, intestinal characteristics, microbiota and carcass traits in broilers[J]. Livestock Science, 2012, 144(3): 253-262.
DOI URL |
[5] |
ZENG Z K, ZHANG S, WANG H L, et al. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: a review[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2015, 6(1): 1-10.
DOI URL |
[6] | 邓奇风, 刘志强, 范觉鑫, 等. 牛至油的研究进展及其在猪生产中的应用[J]. 中国猪业, 2018, 13(2): 41-46. |
DENG Q F, LIU Z Q, FAN J X, et al. Research progress of oregano oil and its application in pig production[J]. China Swine Industry, 2018, 13(2): 41-46.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 牛彪, 梁剑平, 刘宇. 牛至精油在兽药基础研究中的进展[J]. 动物医学进展, 2018, 39(4): 92-96. |
NIU B, LIANG J P, LIU Y. Progress on oregano essential oil in basic veterinary drug research[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 39(4): 92-96.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 梁建勇, 李晓康, 焦婷, 等. 牛至精油在畜禽生产中的研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2017(9): 22-25. |
LIANG J Y, LI X K, JIAO T, et al. Research progress of oregano essential oil in livestock and poultry industry[J]. China Feed, 2017(9): 22-25.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 贾莉, 姜辉, 吴建平, 等. 日粮中添加牛至精油对河西绒山羊羊肉营养品质和脂肪酸的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2020, 41(17): 17-21. |
JIA L, JIANG H, WU J P, et al. Effects of dietary supplement of essential oregano oil on nutritional quality and fatty acid composition in meat of Hexi cashmere goats[J]. Feed Industry, 2020, 41(17): 17-21.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 刘婷, 吴建平, 宫旭胤, 等. 牛至精油对甘肃高山细毛羊肉品质、脂肪酸组成及含量和抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(9): 164-170. |
LIU T, WU J P, GONG X Y, et al. Effect of oregano essential oil on meat quality, fatty acid profiles and antioxidant capacity of Gansu Alpine fine-wool sheep[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(9): 164-170.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 陶春卫, 魏秀莲, 张娟霞, 等. 牛至香酚对肉鸡生长性能的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2015(10): 20-23. |
TAO C W, WEI X L, ZHANG J X, et al. Effects of oregano deodorant on growth performance of broilers[J]. Feed Research, 2015(10): 20-23.(in Chinese) | |
[12] | 姜南. 四种绿色饲料添加剂和金霉素对肉仔鸡免疫功能及其生产性能的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2015. |
JIANG N. Influence of four kinds of green feed additive andauromycin on immune function and production performance of broilers[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 王兰, 陈代文, 余冰, 等. 植物精油对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化能力和免疫机能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(2): 831-838. |
WANG L, CHEN D W, YU B, et al. Effects of essential oil on growth performance, antioxidant capacity and immune function of broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(2): 831-838.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | ZOU Y, XIANG Q H, WANG J, et al. Oregano essential oil improves intestinal morphology and expression of tight junction proteins associated with modulation of selected intestinal bacteria and immune status in a pig model[J]. BioMed Research International, 2016, 2016: 5436738. |
[15] | 孙厚法. 山东省四个地方鸡种产肉性能和肉品质的比较研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015. |
SUN H F. Comparative analysis of four kinds of Shandong indigenous chicken on meat performance and meat quality[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 周明, 吴东, 王孟春, 等. 牛至油替代肉用仔鸡日粮中抗生素效果的研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 89-94. |
ZHOU M, WU D, WANG M C, et al. Effects of oregano oil instead of antibiotics in diet of broiler chickens[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2019, 31(6): 89-94.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] |
KHATTAK F, RONCHI A, CASTELLI P, et al. Effects of natural blend of essential oil on growth performance, blood biochemistry, cecal morphology, and carcass quality of broiler chickens[J]. Poultry Science, 2014, 93(1): 132-137.
DOI URL |
[18] |
JANG I S, KO Y H, KANG S Y, et al. Effect of a commercial essential oil on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and intestinal microflora population in broiler chickens[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 134(3/4): 304-315.
DOI URL |
[19] |
JAMROZ D, WERTELECKI T, HOUSZKA M, et al. Influence of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the stomach and jejunum walls in chicken[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2006, 90(5/6): 255-268.
DOI URL |
[20] |
PIRGOZLIEV V, BRAVO D, MIRZA M W, et al. Growth performance and endogenous losses of broilers fed wheat-based diets with and without essential oils and xylanase supplementation[J]. Poultry Science, 2015, 94(6): 1227-1232.
DOI URL |
[21] | 陈秀琴. 牛至油在畜牧生产上的应用研究进展[J]. 湖北畜牧兽医, 2016, 37(3): 12-15. |
CHEN X Q. Research progress on application of oregano oil in livestock production[J]. Hubei Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2016, 37(3): 12-15.(in Chinese) | |
[22] | 孔繁云, 吴建平, 张科, 等. 饲粮中添加牛至精油、罗伊乳杆菌和莫能菌素对绵羊生长性能、屠宰性能、胴体性状、肉质性状及血清抗氧化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(8): 3771-3779. |
KONG F Y, WU J P, ZHANG K, et al. Effects of dietary oregano essential oil, Lactobacillus reuteri and monensin on growth performance, slaughter performance, carcass traits and serum antioxidant indices of sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(8): 3771-3779.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 初汉平. 牛至油对济宁青山羊生长性能、屠宰性能及肉质的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2019, 40(3): 15-18. |
CHU H P. Effects of oregano essential oil supplemental level on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality in Jining gray goats[J]. Feed Industry, 2019, 40(3): 15-18.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 姜辉. 日粮添加牛至油对河西绒山羊育肥及肉营养品质的研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018. |
JIANG H. Effects of oregano oil supplementation on fattening and meat quality from Hexi cashmere goats[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 韦胜, 郎侠, 王彩莲, 等. 牛至精油对绵羊生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(6): 2823-2829. |
WEI S, LANG X, WANG C L, et al. Effects of oregano essential oil on growth performance, slaughter performance and meat quality of sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(6): 2823-2829.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] |
PENG Q Y, LI J D, LI Z, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on growth performance, carcass traits and jejunal morphology in broiler chickens[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 214: 148-153.
DOI URL |
[27] | 刘记强, 田亚东, 康相涛, 等. 日粮添加苜蓿草粉对固始鸡体重、体尺指标和内脏器官发育的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2009, 21(5): 784-791. |
LIU J Q, TIAN Y D, KANG X T, et al. Effects of alfalfa meal addition in diet on body weight, body measurements and internal organs development of Gushi chickens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2009, 21(5): 784-791.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 程郁昕, 丁建华, 刘玉杰, 等. AA肉鸡生长期主要内脏器官与活重的回归分析[J]. 当代畜牧, 2006(10): 2-4. |
CHENG Y X, DING J H, LIU Y J, et al. Regression score of main visceral organs and live weight of AA broilers during growing period[J]. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2006(10): 2-4.(in Chinese) | |
[29] | 刘丽, 陈晓波, 余红心, 等. 品种与日粮营养水平对鸡内脏器官质量及指数的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2010(11): 49-51. |
LIU L, CHEN X B, YU H X, et al. Effects of varieties and dietary nutritional levels on quality and index of internal organs in chickens[J]. Feed Research, 2010(11): 49-51.(in Chinese) | |
[30] |
RIVAS A L, FABRICANT J. Indications of immunodepression in chickens infected with various strains of Marek’s disease virus[J]. Avian Diseases, 1988, 32(1): 1.
DOI URL |
[31] | SHAD H S, MAZHARI M, ESMAEILIPOUR O, et al. Effects of thymol and carvacrol on productive performance, antioxidant enzyme activity and certain blood metabolites in heat stressed broilers[J]. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2016, 6(1): 195-202. |
[32] | 燕磊, 朱正鹏, 吕尊周, 等. 饲粮中添加不同植物精油对肉仔鸡生长性能、肠道发育、免疫器官指数及屠宰性能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29(4): 1367-1375. |
YAN L, ZHU Z P, LYU Z Z, et al. Effects of dietary different plant essential oils on growth performance, intestinal development, immune organ indexes and slaughter performance of broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017, 29(4): 1367-1375.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 周洪彬, 魏景坤, 刘洋, 等. 植物精油对肉仔鸡生长性能、免疫功能及肠道发育的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(8): 3887-3895. |
ZHOU H B, WEI J K, LIU Y, et al. Effects of plant essential oil on growth performance, immune function and intestinal development of broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(8): 3887-3895.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] |
HASELMEYER A, ZENTEK J, CHIZZOLA R. Effects of thyme as a feed additive in broiler chickens on thymol in gut contents, blood plasma, liver and muscle[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2015, 95(3): 504-508.
DOI URL |
[35] | 张显东. 香芹酚和百里香酚的作用机理及其在单胃动物中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2017, 53(11): 25-30. |
ZHANG X D. The mode of action and application of carvacrol and thymol in monogastric animals: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 53(11): 25-30.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 周建民, 马友彪, 张海军, 等. 白酒糟酵母培养物对肉仔鸡生长性能、血清抗氧化指标和肠道形态结构的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(5): 2357-2366. |
ZHOU J M, MA Y B, ZHANG H J, et al. Effects of yeast culture using distiller’s grains on growth performance, serum antioxidant indices and intestinal morphology of broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(5): 2357-2366.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] |
PAIVA D, WALK C, MCELROY A. Dietary calcium, phosphorus, and phytase effects on bird performance, intestinal morphology, mineral digestibility, and bone ash during a natural necrotic enteritis episode[J]. Poultry Science, 2014, 93(11): 2752-2762.
DOI URL |
[38] | 陈祥宇, 耿浩川, 侯建库, 等. 复合植物提取物对蛋鸡生产性能、肠道黏膜形态及盲肠菌群结构的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(4): 2033-2043. |
CHEN X Y, GENG H C, HOU J K, et al. Effects of compound plant extracts on performance, intestinal mucosal morphology and cecal microflora structure of laying hens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(4): 2033-2043.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 于洁, 范雪, 赵敏孟, 等. 丁酸梭菌和枯草芽孢杆菌对肉鹅生长性能、消化酶活性、抗氧化功能和肠道形态的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(2): 860-868. |
YU J, FAN X, ZHAO M M, et al. Effects of Clostridium butyricum and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities, antioxidant function and intestinal morphology of meat geese[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(2): 860-868.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] |
BRAVO D, UTTERBACK P, PARSONS C M. Evaluation of a mixture of carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and Capsicum oleoresin for improving growth performance and metabolizable energy in broiler chicks fed corn and soybean meal[J]. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2011, 20(2): 115-120.
DOI URL |
[41] |
DU E C, WANG W W, GAN L P, et al. Effects of thymol and carvacrol supplementation on intestinal integrity and immune responses of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2016, 7: 19.
DOI URL |
[42] |
HALLIWELL B, ZHAO K C, WHITEMAN M. The gastrointestinal tract: a major site of antioxidant action?[J]. Free Radical Research, 2000, 33(6): 819-830.
DOI URL |
[43] | 魏爱春, 杨修仕, 么杨, 等. 藜麦营养功能成分及生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(15): 272-276. |
WEI A C, YANG X S, YAO Y, et al. Progress in research on nutritional and functional components and bioactivity of quinoa(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(15): 272-276.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||