Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 383-393.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.02.16
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Bo1(), TAO Zhen2, ZHOU Rui2, WANG Xue2, LYU Qianqian2, SUN Shihong1, WANG Han2, GAO Jinqiu2, ZHANG Chuhan1, CHEN Fengqing2,*(
)
Received:
2022-04-21
Online:
2023-02-25
Published:
2023-03-14
Contact:
CHEN Fengqing
CLC Number:
MA Bo, TAO Zhen, ZHOU Rui, WANG Xue, LYU Qianqian, SUN Shihong, WANG Han, GAO Jinqiu, ZHANG Chuhan, CHEN Fengqing. Study on optimization of extraction conditions and activity of functional components from Dieffenbachia picta[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 383-393.
水平 Levels | 因素Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃ | B提取时间 Extraction time/h | C料液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(g·mL-1) | D提取次数 Extraction times | |
1 | 85 | 1.0 | 1∶30 | 1 |
2 | 90 | 1.5 | 1∶35 | 2 |
3 | 95 | 2.0 | 1∶40 | 3 |
Table 1 Levels and factors of orthogonal test for polysaccharide extraction
水平 Levels | 因素Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A提取温度 Extraction temperature/℃ | B提取时间 Extraction time/h | C料液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(g·mL-1) | D提取次数 Extraction times | |
1 | 85 | 1.0 | 1∶30 | 1 |
2 | 90 | 1.5 | 1∶35 | 2 |
3 | 95 | 2.0 | 1∶40 | 3 |
水平 Levels | 因素Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A料液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(g·mL-1) | B超声时间 Ultrasonic time/min | C超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature/℃ | D乙醇体积分数 Ethanol volume fraction/% | |
1 | 1∶30 | 40 | 58 | 85 |
2 | 1∶35 | 60 | 66 | 90 |
3 | 1∶40 | 80 | 74 | 95 |
Table 2 Levels and factors of orthogonal test for alkaloid extraction
水平 Levels | 因素Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A料液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(g·mL-1) | B超声时间 Ultrasonic time/min | C超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature/℃ | D乙醇体积分数 Ethanol volume fraction/% | |
1 | 1∶30 | 40 | 58 | 85 |
2 | 1∶35 | 60 | 66 | 90 |
3 | 1∶40 | 80 | 74 | 95 |
编号 No. | A浸渍次数 Impregnation times | B浸渍时间 Immersion time/s | C浸渍液生物碱浓度 Alkaloid concentration in impregnation solution/(mg·mL-1) | D培养温度 Culture temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 65 |
2 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 80 |
3 | 3 | 12 | 16 | 60 |
4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 75 |
5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 55 |
6 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 70 |
Table 3 Uniform design table
编号 No. | A浸渍次数 Impregnation times | B浸渍时间 Immersion time/s | C浸渍液生物碱浓度 Alkaloid concentration in impregnation solution/(mg·mL-1) | D培养温度 Culture temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 65 |
2 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 80 |
3 | 3 | 12 | 16 | 60 |
4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 75 |
5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 55 |
6 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 70 |
序号 Serial number | A提取温度 Extraction temperature | B提取时间 Extraction time | C料液比 Solid-liquid ratio | D提取次数 Extraction times | 得率 Yield/(mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 72.89 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 31.43 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 72.53 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 72.89 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 49.41 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 71.79 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 56.58 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 76.37 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 43.12 |
Table 4 Design and results of orthogonal test for polysaccharide extraction from D. picta
序号 Serial number | A提取温度 Extraction temperature | B提取时间 Extraction time | C料液比 Solid-liquid ratio | D提取次数 Extraction times | 得率 Yield/(mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 72.89 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 31.43 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 72.53 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 72.89 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 49.41 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 71.79 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 56.58 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 76.37 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 43.12 |
因素 Factor | 得率Yield | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/(mg·g-1) | k2/(mg·g-1) | k3/(mg·g-1) | 极差Range | 最优水平Optimum level | |
A提取温度Extraction temperature | 58.95 | 64.70 | 58.69 | 6.01 | 2 |
B提取时间Extraction time | 67.45 | 52.41 | 62.48 | 15.05 | 1 |
C料液比Solid-liquid ratio | 73.68 | 49.15 | 59.51 | 24.54 | 1 |
D提取次数Extraction times | 55.14 | 53.27 | 73.93 | 20.66 | 3 |
Table 5 Range analysis results
因素 Factor | 得率Yield | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/(mg·g-1) | k2/(mg·g-1) | k3/(mg·g-1) | 极差Range | 最优水平Optimum level | |
A提取温度Extraction temperature | 58.95 | 64.70 | 58.69 | 6.01 | 2 |
B提取时间Extraction time | 67.45 | 52.41 | 62.48 | 15.05 | 1 |
C料液比Solid-liquid ratio | 73.68 | 49.15 | 59.51 | 24.54 | 1 |
D提取次数Extraction times | 55.14 | 53.27 | 73.93 | 20.66 | 3 |
评价指标 Evaluating indicator | 样品号Number of samples | 平均值 Average value | 极差 Range | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||
多糖得率 | 81.046 | 80.688 | 80.225 | 80.628 | 80.554 | 80.598 | 80.623 | 0.821 | 0.3 |
Polysaccharide yield/(mg·g-1) | |||||||||
生物碱得率 | 2.215 | 2.215 | 2.161 | 2.223 | 2.223 | 2.206 | 2.207 | 0.017 | 1.1 |
Alkaloid yield/(mg·g-1) |
Table 6 Precision of polysaccharides and alkaloids extraction from D. picta
评价指标 Evaluating indicator | 样品号Number of samples | 平均值 Average value | 极差 Range | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||
多糖得率 | 81.046 | 80.688 | 80.225 | 80.628 | 80.554 | 80.598 | 80.623 | 0.821 | 0.3 |
Polysaccharide yield/(mg·g-1) | |||||||||
生物碱得率 | 2.215 | 2.215 | 2.161 | 2.223 | 2.223 | 2.206 | 2.207 | 0.017 | 1.1 |
Alkaloid yield/(mg·g-1) |
评价指标 Evaluating indicator | 测定时间Determination time/h | 平均值 Average value | 极差 Range | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 24 | ||||
多糖得率 | 80.695 | 80.457 | 80.419 | 80.621 | 80.404 | 80.519 | 0.291 | 0.2 |
Polysaccharide yield/(mg·g-1) | ||||||||
生物碱得率 | 2.213 | 2.216 | 2.222 | 2.225 | 2.215 | 2.218 | 0.0118 | 0.2 |
Alkaloid yield/(mg·g-1) |
Table 7 Stability of polysaccharides and alkaloids extraction from D. picta
评价指标 Evaluating indicator | 测定时间Determination time/h | 平均值 Average value | 极差 Range | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 24 | ||||
多糖得率 | 80.695 | 80.457 | 80.419 | 80.621 | 80.404 | 80.519 | 0.291 | 0.2 |
Polysaccharide yield/(mg·g-1) | ||||||||
生物碱得率 | 2.213 | 2.216 | 2.222 | 2.225 | 2.215 | 2.218 | 0.0118 | 0.2 |
Alkaloid yield/(mg·g-1) |
试验号 No. | 试验设计方案Test design scheme | 得率 Yield/(mg·g-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A料液比 Solid-liquid ratio | B超声时间 Ultrasonic time | C超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature | D乙醇体积分数 Ethanol volume fraction | ||
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.720 475 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.184 306 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1.989 296 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.970 469 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1.781 770 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1.782 198 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1.851 943 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.832 154 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2.204 310 |
Table 8 Design and results of orthogonal test for alkaloid extraction from D. picta
试验号 No. | 试验设计方案Test design scheme | 得率 Yield/(mg·g-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A料液比 Solid-liquid ratio | B超声时间 Ultrasonic time | C超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature | D乙醇体积分数 Ethanol volume fraction | ||
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.720 475 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.184 306 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1.989 296 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.970 469 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1.781 770 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1.782 198 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1.851 943 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.832 154 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2.204 310 |
因素 Factors | 得率Yield | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/(mg·g-1) | k2/(mg·g-1) | k3/(mg·g-1) | 极差Range | 最优水平Optimum level | |
A料液比Solid-liquid ratio | 1.964 692 | 1.844 812 | 1.962 802 | 0.119 880 | 1 |
B超声时间Ultrasonic time | 1.847 629 | 1.932 743 | 1.991 934 | 0.144 305 | 3 |
C超声温度Ultrasonic temperature | 1.778 275 | 2.119 695 | 1.874 336 | 0.245 359 | 2 |
D乙醇体积分数Ethanol volume fraction | 1.902 185 | 1.939 482 | 1.930 639 | 0.037 297 | 2 |
Table 9 Range analysis results
因素 Factors | 得率Yield | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/(mg·g-1) | k2/(mg·g-1) | k3/(mg·g-1) | 极差Range | 最优水平Optimum level | |
A料液比Solid-liquid ratio | 1.964 692 | 1.844 812 | 1.962 802 | 0.119 880 | 1 |
B超声时间Ultrasonic time | 1.847 629 | 1.932 743 | 1.991 934 | 0.144 305 | 3 |
C超声温度Ultrasonic temperature | 1.778 275 | 2.119 695 | 1.874 336 | 0.245 359 | 2 |
D乙醇体积分数Ethanol volume fraction | 1.902 185 | 1.939 482 | 1.930 639 | 0.037 297 | 2 |
Fig.5 Antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from D. picta A, DPPH free radical scavenging ability; B, ABTS free radical scavenging ability; C, Scavenging ability on hydroxyl radical; D, Fe3+ reduction ability.
分组 Group | 虫体死亡率Insect mortality/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera | 小菜夜蛾Plutella xylostella | 大麦虫Zophobas atratus | |||||||
12 h | 24 h | 36 h | 12 h | 24 h | 36 h | 12 h | 24 h | 36 h | |
1 | 82.22 ±3.33 a | 84.44 ±2.22 ab | 90.00 ±0.01 a | 84.44 ±2.22 b | 87.78 ±3.33 b | 87.78 ±3.33 b | 42.22 ±2.32 d | 61.11 ±5.32 d | 64.44 ±1.32 f |
2 | 82.22 ±3.33 a | 86.67 ±3.33 a | 92.22 ±2.22 a | 92.22 ±2.22 a | 94.44 ±1.23 ab | 95.56 ±1.23 a | 57.78 ±3.33 b | 78.89 ±3.33 c | 85.56 ±2.22 d |
3 | 64.44 ±2.22 c | 81.11 ±2.22 b | 86.67 ±3.33 a | 82.22 ±1.23 b | 87.78 ±2.22 b | 90.00 ±0.01 b | 51.11 ±3.33 c | 61.11 ±2.22 d | 67.78 ±2.22 e |
4 | 53.33 ±3.33 d | 63.33 ±3.33 c | 71.11 ±3.33 b | 55.56 ±3.33 c | 71.11 ±1.23 c | 76.67 ±3.33 c | 83.33 ±0.01 a | 87.78 ±1.23 b | 88.89 ±3.33 c |
5 | 74.45 ±2.22 b | 84.45 ±2.22 ab | 87.78 ±3.33 a | 54.44 ±1.23 c | 63.33 ±3.33 c | 72.22 ±3.33 c | 80.00 ±3.33 a | 88.89 ±2.22 ab | 93.33 ±0.01 b |
6 | 72.22 ±1.23 b | 83.33 ±0.01 ab | 88.89 ±1.23 a | 88.89 ±1.23 a | 96.67 ±0.01 a | 96.67 ±0.01 a | 78.78 ±3.33 a | 93.33 ±0.01 a | 96.67 ±0.01 a |
Table 10 Insecticidal results of alkaloids from D. picta
分组 Group | 虫体死亡率Insect mortality/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera | 小菜夜蛾Plutella xylostella | 大麦虫Zophobas atratus | |||||||
12 h | 24 h | 36 h | 12 h | 24 h | 36 h | 12 h | 24 h | 36 h | |
1 | 82.22 ±3.33 a | 84.44 ±2.22 ab | 90.00 ±0.01 a | 84.44 ±2.22 b | 87.78 ±3.33 b | 87.78 ±3.33 b | 42.22 ±2.32 d | 61.11 ±5.32 d | 64.44 ±1.32 f |
2 | 82.22 ±3.33 a | 86.67 ±3.33 a | 92.22 ±2.22 a | 92.22 ±2.22 a | 94.44 ±1.23 ab | 95.56 ±1.23 a | 57.78 ±3.33 b | 78.89 ±3.33 c | 85.56 ±2.22 d |
3 | 64.44 ±2.22 c | 81.11 ±2.22 b | 86.67 ±3.33 a | 82.22 ±1.23 b | 87.78 ±2.22 b | 90.00 ±0.01 b | 51.11 ±3.33 c | 61.11 ±2.22 d | 67.78 ±2.22 e |
4 | 53.33 ±3.33 d | 63.33 ±3.33 c | 71.11 ±3.33 b | 55.56 ±3.33 c | 71.11 ±1.23 c | 76.67 ±3.33 c | 83.33 ±0.01 a | 87.78 ±1.23 b | 88.89 ±3.33 c |
5 | 74.45 ±2.22 b | 84.45 ±2.22 ab | 87.78 ±3.33 a | 54.44 ±1.23 c | 63.33 ±3.33 c | 72.22 ±3.33 c | 80.00 ±3.33 a | 88.89 ±2.22 ab | 93.33 ±0.01 b |
6 | 72.22 ±1.23 b | 83.33 ±0.01 ab | 88.89 ±1.23 a | 88.89 ±1.23 a | 96.67 ±0.01 a | 96.67 ±0.01 a | 78.78 ±3.33 a | 93.33 ±0.01 a | 96.67 ±0.01 a |
[1] | 孙淑萍, 毕兆东, 王靓, 等. 花叶万年青与白掌水培技术研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(2): 181-183. |
SUN S P, BI Z D, WANG L, et al. Study on hydroponics technology of evergreen mosaic and white palm[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(2): 181-183. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 祁春艳, 王晶, 武旭, 等. 天南星炮制前后主要化学成分含量变化研究[J]. 中草药, 2022, 53(1): 87-98. |
QI C Y, WANG J, WU X, et al. Study on chemical composition changes of Arisaematis Rhizoma before and after processing[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2022, 53(1): 87-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 安晓娟, 冯琳, 宋红平, 等. 植物多糖的结构分析及药理活性研究进展[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2012, 47(16): 1271-1275. |
AN X J, FENG L, SONG H P, et al. Research progress on structural analysis and pharmacological activity of plant polysaccharides[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2012, 47(16): 1271-1275. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 董文燊, 谭兴起, 邵留英, 等. 正交试验法优选假蒟中总生物碱的提取工艺[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2019, 22(7): 750-753. |
DONG W S, TAN X Q, SHAO L Y, et al. Optimization of extraction process of total alkaloids from Piper sarmentosum Roxb. by orthogonal experimental design[J]. Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies, 2019, 22(7): 750-753. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 梁永锋, 李嘉会, 曹江平. 杏花中多糖提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(7): 208-210. |
LIANG Y F, LI J H, CAO J P. Study on extracting technology and antioxidant activities of polysaccharide from apricot flower[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(7): 208-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 杨玲, 陈阳, 杨小生, 等. 响应面法优化仙茅多糖酶解工艺及体外免疫活性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(8): 229-237. |
YANG L, CHEN Y, YANG X S, et al. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis process of Curculigo orchioides polysaccharides by response surface methodology and in vitro immunostimulatory activities[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(8): 229-237. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 陈利华, 王欣, 成家杨. 不同方法提取海洋硅藻粗多糖的比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 280-289. |
CHEN L H, WANG X, CHENG J Y. Comparison of crude polysaccharides extraction from marine diatom under different methods[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(2): 280-289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 王瑜, 高畅, 张娜, 等. 芋头多糖的提取及生物活性的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2006, 27(6): 73-75. |
WANG Y, GAO C, ZHANG N, et al. Study on extraction of taro polysaccharides and their bioactivity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2006, 27(6): 73-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 曹书立, 孟宪泽, 魏品康. 半夏多糖对希罗达干预下小鼠腺癌细胞MHC-Ⅱ分子表达的增效作用[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2010, 10(11): 2034-2036. |
CAO S L, MENG X Z, WEI P K. Synergism of Pinellia ternate polysaccharide on capecitabine tablets in inhibition of colon cancer in mice[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2010, 10(11): 2034-2036. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 赵永娟, 王蕾, 侯琳, 等. 半夏多糖抗肿瘤作用研究[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2006, 22(3): 368-371. |
ZHAO Y J, WANG L, HOU L, et al. A study on the anti-tumor effect of polysaccharides from Pinellia tuber[J]. Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin, 2006, 22(3): 368-371. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 徐馨, 周庆民, 冯万宇, 等. 二次回归正交旋转组合设计优化苦参生物碱薄层层析条件研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2013(9): 141-142. |
XU X, ZHOU Q M, FENG W Y, et al. Optimization of TLC conditions of Sophora flavescens alkaloids by quadratic regression orthogonal rotation combination design[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2013(9): 141-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 潘诗哲, 但凡, 樊洁敏, 等. 响应面法优化荷叶生物碱盐提取工艺及其纯化[J]. 精细化工, 2019, 36(8): 1598-1603. |
PAN S Z, DAN F, FAN J M, et al. Optimization of extraction process by response surface methodology and purification of alkaloid salts from lotus leaves[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2019, 36(8): 1598-1603. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 陈凤清, 孙秋芹, 傅玉全, 等. 黄瓜籽粉止咳成分提取工艺及生物活性探究[J]. 白城师范学院学报, 2020, 34(5): 27-32. |
CHEN F Q, SUN Q Q, FU Y Q, et al. Study on extraction technology and biological activity of cough relieving ingredient of cucumber seed powder[J]. Journal of Baicheng Normal University, 2020, 34(5): 27-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 邵金华, 李涛, 杨佳. 微波辅助大蒜多糖的提取及其抗氧化活性的研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2013, 25(4): 868-872. |
SHAO J H, LI T, YANG J. Study on microwave-assisted extraction of garlic polysaccharide and its antioxidant activity[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2013, 25(4): 868-872. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | FENG Y Q, ZHANG J X, WEN C T, et al. Recent advances in Agaricus bisporus polysaccharides: extraction, purification, physicochemical characterization and bioactivities[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2020, 94: 39-50. |
[16] | 何瑞阳, 王锋, 苏小军, 等. 玉竹多糖低共熔溶剂提取工艺优化及其抗氧化和抗糖基化活性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(8): 190-198. |
HE R Y, WANG F, SU X J, et al. Optimization of extraction process of Polygonatum odoratum polysaccharide by deep eutectic solvent and its antioxidant and anti glycosylation activities[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(8): 190-198. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 罗冬兰, 黎晓燕, 曹森, 等. 贵州不同种类茶叶的几种抗氧化成分及其抗氧化能力分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 49(17): 35-41. |
LUO D L, LI X Y, CAO S, et al. Comparison on several antioxidant components and activity for different kinds of Guizhou tea[J]. Food Research and Development, 2019, 49(17): 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 敖苏, 林小漫, 张旭, 等. 3种入侵植物乙醇提取物对椰子木蛾的杀虫活性研究[J]. 中国果树, 2018(3): 19-22. |
AO S, LIN X M, ZHANG X, et al. Insecticidal activity of 3 species of invasive plants ethanol extracts against Opisina arenosella[J]. China Fruits, 2018(3): 19-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 李波, 赵永田, 高甜甜, 等. 5种植物乙醇提取物抑菌杀虫活性[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(4): 451-457. |
LI B, ZHAO Y T, GAO T T, et al. Antibacterial and insecticidal activities of ethanol plant extracts[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(4): 451-457. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 孔维宝, 杨树玲, 霍焕燃, 等. 油橄榄叶提取物的抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国油脂, 2020, 45(2): 95-100. |
KONG W B, YANG S L, HUO H R, et al. Antibacterial activity of olive leaves extract[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2020, 45(2): 95-100. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 霍达, 李琳, 张霞, 等. 玉竹多糖的提取工艺优化、结构表征及抗氧化活性的研究[J]. 食品科技, 2020, 45(7):200-208. |
HUO D, LI L, ZHANG X, et al. Optimization of extraction process, structural characterization and antioxidant activity of polygonatum odoratum polysaccharides[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2020, 45 (7): 200-208. | |
[22] | 初维, 李兰兰, 李岩, 等. 白鲜皮多糖的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2017, 35(7): 1809-1812. |
CHU W, LI L L, LI Y, et al. Extraction process and antioxidation activities of cortex dictamni polysaccharide[J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2017, 35(7): 1809-1812. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李珊, 梁俭, 冯彬, 等. 响应面法优化超声波辅助提取山竹果皮多糖的工艺及其体外抗氧活性研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(10): 103-110. |
LI S, LIANG J, FENG B, et al. Response surface methodology promoted ultrasound-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from mangosteen peels and evaluation of antioxidant activity in vitro[J]. Food Research and Development, 2020, 41(10): 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 王丽波, 程龙, 徐雅琴, 等. 南瓜籽多糖热水提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(9): 284-290. |
WANG L B, CHENG L, XU Y Q, et al. Extraction technology optimization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from pumpkin seeds[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(9): 284-290. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | SHAO Yuchen, MU Honglei, CHEN Hangjun, YIN Junyi, FANG Xiangjun, WU Weijie, LIU Ruiling, HAN Yanchao, GAO Haiyan. Effects of intestinal conditions and particle size on in vitro digestion of processed Carya cathayensis Sarg. [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1734-1742. |
[2] | LIU Jing, HU Xiao, YANG Xianqing, CHEN Shengjun, WU Yanyan, LI Laihao, QI Bo, DENG Jianchao. Extraction and antioxidant activity of enzymolysis products of Gracilaria lemaneiformis protein [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 1061-1072. |
[3] | LU Linghong, MA Yuanyuan, GU Xianbin, XIAO Jinping, SONG Genhua, ZHANG Huiqin. Changes of polysaccharide content and pectin degradation related enzyme activities in cell wall during softening of kiwifruit [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2648-2658. |
[4] | LIN Yuqing, LU Shengmin, ZHOU Wanyi, XING Jianrong, YANG Ying. Preliminary investigation about structure and probiotic properties of polysaccharides from Dendrobium officinale leaves [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2504-2511. |
[5] | LI Xue, ZHANG Yu, WANG Junhong, ZHU Zuoyi, SUN Suling, LIU Zhi, ZHU Shenlong, SHEN Guoxin, Agusti ROMERO, WANG Wei. UPLC-FLD determination and antioxidant activity of polyphenols in virgin olive oil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 907-915. |
[6] | LI Yuancheng, SUN Hong, WU Yifei, YAO Xiaohong, SHEN Qi, TANG Jiangwu. Nutritional components and antioxidant activity of solid-state fermented cottonseed kernel [J]. , 2020, 32(4): 610-615. |
[7] | WU Weicheng, DAI Jianbo, CAO Yan, XIA Qile, CHEN Jianbing, MENG Xianghe. Effects of physical modification on content, polysaccharide composition and structure of dietary fiber in sweet potato peels [J]. , 2020, 32(3): 490-498. |
[8] | WANG Mingzhe, YANG Ying, TANG Weimin, LIU Zhe, SUN Peilong, LU Shengmin. Optimization of fermentation techniques on yield of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus pentosae YY112 [J]. , 2020, 32(2): 327-336. |
[9] | YANG Zhi, LI Wenyi, GAO Yuntao, XIONG Huabin, CHEN Yijian, YANG Huijuan. Optimization of extraction process of total flavonoids from Acerola cherry by response surface methodology and their antioxidant activities [J]. , 2020, 32(10): 1866-1872. |
[10] | ZHANG Wenping, WANG Qing, HUANG Shichen, WU Peijia, CHENG Xin. Effects of exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria on rice growth and soil physicochemical properties [J]. , 2019, 31(1): 130-138. |
[11] | HAN Chunyang, YANG Mingchuan, YANG Zisheng, FENG Kangli, LIU Cuiyan. Study on extraction of Polygonatum sibiricum polysaccharides and its protective effect on CCl4-induced acute liver injury in rats [J]. , 2018, 30(4): 537-547. |
[12] | CHEN Lihua, WANG Xin, CHENG Jiayang. Comparison of crude polysaccharides extraction from marine diatom under different methods [J]. , 2018, 30(2): 280-289. |
[13] | WANG Chuyan, CHENG Junwen, ZHU Chao. Optimization of extracellular polysaccharide production from Fructificatio amaurodermatis Rudae by liquid submerged fermentation and its antioxidant activity [J]. , 2018, 30(11): 1938-1945. |
[14] | QIN Yi, LYU Guoying, ZHANG Zuofa. Studies on immunomodulatory and antioxidant activities in vitro of recombinant human lactoferrin from transgenic rice [J]. , 2018, 30(1): 1-6. |
[15] | HUANG Fangfang, YIN Jie, YAN Zhipeng, XIAO Weiqiang, BI Yiming, YANG Yanqin, ZHOU Guojun, NIU Fangfang, YANG Jun. Moisture retentiveness, pyrolysis productions and biological safety of polysaccharides extracts from Sargassum horneri in cut tobacco [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 831-839. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 633
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 331
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||