Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240544

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 349-364.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240544

• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu

LI Can¹(), YANG Ting¹, SUN Yiming¹^,²^,³, CHEN Hongliang¹^,², CUI Qi¹, SHEN Xiaoxia¹^,²^,³^,^*()

1. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 311402, China
2. Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Songyang Research Institute Co., Ltd., Songyang 323400, Zhejiang, China
3. Zhejiang Engineering Research Centre for Essential Oils of Chinese Medicines and Plants, Hangzhou 310053, China

Received:2024-06-24 Online:2025-02-25 Published:2025-03-20
Contact: SHEN Xiaoxia

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to screen out the advantageous germplasm resources suitable for the breeding of new varieties, the main agronomic traits and chemical components contents of 20 germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu in Zhejiang Province were counted and determined. Diversity analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were carried out. The results revealed significant variability and rich diversity in both agronomic traits and chemical composition contents among the 20 R. chingii samples. Correlation analysis between agronomic traits and chemical composition contents indicated significant positive correlations between traits such as fruit pedicel length, fruit shape, and contents of most chemical components. Positive correlations were also observed between traits like fruit yield, flower diameter, stem branching number, and contents of certain chemical components, while negative correlations were found between traits such as plant diameter, branch diameter, and contents of specific chemical components. Based on the principal component analysis scores for fruit yield and chemical composition contents of R. chingii, two superior germplasm resources, namely Y3 and Y9, were identified. This study provides valuable insights for the breeding of new R. chingii varieties and the evaluation of medicinal quality in authentic medicinal materials.

Key words: Rubus chingii, genetic resource, agronomic trait, chemical content, yield

CLC Number:

S663

LI Can, YANG Ting, SUN Yiming, CHEN Hongliang, CUI Qi, SHEN Xiaoxia. Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 349-364.

Figures/Tables 16

References 33

[1]	柯创, 张婷婷, 刘考铧, 等. 覆盆子的基原植物考证[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2021, 45(9): 1026-1032.
	KE C, ZHANG T T, LIU K H, et al. Research on original plants of rubi fructus[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 2021, 45(9): 1026-1032. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:一部[M]. 2020年版. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 399.
[3]	何伯伟, 姜娟萍, 徐丹彬. 道地药材“浙八味” 与新“浙八味”[J]. 新农村, 2020(5): 21-22.
	HE B W, JIANG J P, XU D B. Authentic medicinal materials “Zhe Eight Flavors” and the new “Zhe Eight Flavors”[J]. Xin Nongcun, 2020(5): 21-22. (in Chinese)
[4]	陈奎霖, 黄达荣, 黄少杰, 等. 覆盆子活性成分及其综合利用研究进展[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(9): 219-226.
	CHEN K L, HUANG D R, HUANG S J, et al. Research progress on active components and comprehensive utilization of Rubus chingii Hu[J]. Food & Machinery, 2022, 38(9): 219-226. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	夏轩轩, 李昆, 丁研华, 等. 覆盆子及有效部位对老年大鼠学习记忆能力的影响及机制初探[J]. 中药药理与临床, 2015, 31(3): 110-113.
	XIA X X, LI K, DING Y H, et al. Effects of Raspberry and it’s effective position on learning and memory impairment rats of natural aging[J]. Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica, 2015, 31(3): 110-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	SHENG J Y, WANG S Q, LIU K H, et al. Rubus chingii Hu: an overview of botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology[J]. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, 2020, 18(6): 401-416.
[7]	SUN N, WANG Y, LIU Y, et al. A new ent-labdane diterpene saponin from the fruits of Rubus chingii[J]. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 2013, 49(1): 49-53.
[8]	TANAKA T, KOHDA H, TANAKA O, et al. Rubusoside (Β-d-glucosyl ester of 13-O-β-d-glucosyl-steviol), a sweet principle of Rubus Chingii Hu (rosaceae)[J]. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1981, 45(9): 2165-2166.
[9]	季宇彬, 包晓威, 单宇, 等. 覆盆子提取物对ConA致小鼠急性肝损伤的保护作用研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2019, 44(4): 774-780.
	JI Y B, BAO X W, SHAN Y, et al. Protective effect of raspberry extract on ConA-induced acute liver injury in mice[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2019, 44(4): 774-780. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	ZENG H J, LIU Z, WANG Y P, et al. Studies on the anti-aging activity of a glycoprotein isolated from Fupenzi (Rubus chingii Hu.) and its regulation on klotho gene expression in mice kidney[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 119: 470-476.
[11]	HE B H, DAI L H, JIN L, et al. Bioactive components, pharmacological effects, and drug development of traditional herbal medicine Rubus chingii Hu (Fu-Pen-Zi)[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023, 9: 1052504.
[12]	KE H H, BAO T, CHEN W. Polysaccharide from Rubus chingii Hu affords protection against palmitic acid-induced lipotoxicity in human hepatocytes[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 133: 1063-1071.
[13]	LIANG W Q, XU G J, WENG D, et al. Anti-osteoporotic components of Rubus chingii[J]. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 2015, 51(1): 47-49.
[14]	陈亦权, 陈珍, 江景勇, 等. 掌叶覆盆子种内与种间遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(21): 183-188.
	CHEN Y Q, CHEN Z, JIANG J Y, et al. RAPD analysis of intra-and inter-specific genetic diversity in Rubus chingii Hu palmatus[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 61(21): 183-188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	WILLMAN M R, BUSHAKRA J M, BASSIL N, et al. Analysis of a multi-environment trial for black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) quality traits[J]. Genes, 2022, 13(3): 418.
[16]	GUAN L, ZHAO M Z, QIAN Y M, et al. Phenotypic analysis combined with tandem mass tags (TMT) labeling reveal the heterogeneity of strawberry stolon buds[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1): 505.
[17]	孙健, 任江剑, 华金渭, 等. 华东地区掌叶覆盆子的表型特征和基于ISSR标记的遗传分析[J]. 中国现代中药, 2021, 23(3): 426-431.
	SUN J, REN J J, HUA J W, et al. Phenotype characteristics and genetic analysis based on ISSR makers of Rubus chingii in East China[J]. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2021, 23(3): 426-431. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	刘云鹤, 王晓林, 钟方丽. 三氯化铝显色法测定刺玫叶提取物总黄酮的含量[J]. 特产研究, 2017, 39(2): 50-53.
	LIU Y H, WANG X L, ZHONG F L. Content determination of total flavonoids in extracts of Rosa davurica Pall. leaves with aluminium trichloride chromogenic method[J]. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research, 2017, 39(2): 50-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	朱仙慕, 陈丹, 马国萍, 等. 叶下珠薄层色谱鉴别及福林酚法测定总多酚含量研究[J]. 中国中医药科技, 2018, 25(4): 514-519.
	ZHU X M, CHEN D, MA G P, et al. Study on thin layer chromatographic identification and determination of total polyphenols by folin ciocalteu method of Yexiazhu(Phyllanthus urinaria L)[J]. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Science and Technology, 2018, 25(4): 514-519. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	吕亭亭, 杨志华, 韩永红, 等. 响应面法优化苯酚-硫酸法测定泡桐花多糖含量[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2020, 37(7): 62-68.
	LV T T, YANG Z H, HAN Y H, et al. Optimization in phenol-sulfuric acid method for determination of content of paulowniae flos polysaccharide by response surface methodology[J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2020, 37(7): 62-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	孙乙铭, 许寿增, 俞春英, 等. 覆盆子成熟过程颜色表征及其与品质指标消长的相关性研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2021, 46(6): 1379-1385.
	SUN Y M, XU S Z, YU C Y, et al. Color characterization and its correlation with quality index during ripening of Rubus chingii[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2021, 46(6): 1379-1385. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	于沐, 杨海棠, 胡延岭, 等. 河南省316份花生资源抗叶斑病的抗性评价分析[J]. 种子, 2024, 43(6): 86-90.
	YU M, YANG H T, HU Y L, et al. Evaluation and analysis of resistance to leaf spot of 316 peanut resources in Henan Province[J]. Seed, 2024, 43(6): 86-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	李宁. 常规育种技术在园林植物资源开发中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(10): 3405-3410.
	LI N. The application of conventional breeding techniques in the development of garden plant resources[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2024, 22(10): 3405-3410. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	张武君, 陈菁瑛, 刘保财, 等. 37份福建山药地方品种主要性状遗传变异研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(11): 1246-1254.
	ZHANG W J, CHEN J Y, LIU B C, et al. Genetic variations on major traits of 37 Chinese yam germplasms[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(11): 1246-1254. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	CUI H L, CHEN C R, HUANG N Z, et al. Association analysis of yield, oil and fatty acid content, and main phenotypic traits in Paeonia rockii as an oil crop[J]. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2018, 93(4): 425-432.
[26]	李华锋, 滕杰, 杨家干, 等. 连南栽培型古茶树资源叶片表型性状遗传多样性及聚类分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(36): 109-114.
	LI H F, TENG J, YANG J G, et al. Genetic diversity and cluster analysis of leaf phenotypic traits of Liannan cultivated ancient tea[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(36): 109-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	张翠琴, 姬志峰, 林丽丽, 等. 五角枫种群表型多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(16): 5343-5352.
	ZHANG C Q, JI Z F, LIN L L, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Acer mono maxim population[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(16): 5343-5352. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	张怀山, 夏曾润, 代立兰, 等. 中型狼尾草种质资源表型性状的多样性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(12): 51-59.
	ZHANG H S, XIA Z R, DAI L L, et al. Phenotypic diversity of Pennisetum longissimum var. intermedium germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(12): 51-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	朱丽, 薛新如, 梁宗旭, 等. 辣椒种质资源辣椒素含量与农艺性状的相关性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 862-872.
	ZHU L, XUE X R, LIANG Z X, et al. Correlation between capsaicin content and agronomic traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 862-872. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	冯链, 田翔, 乔治军, 等. 谷子农艺性状与蛋白质含量相关性分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(6): 43-53.
	FENG L, TIAN X, QIAO Z J, et al. Correlation analysis between protein content and agronomic traits of foxtail millet[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(6): 43-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	吴林, 张强, 王颖, 等. 中国树莓科学研究和产业发展的回顾与展望[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2021, 43(3): 265-274.
	WU L, ZHANG Q, WANG Y, et al. Review and prospect of scientific research and industrial development of raspberry in China[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2021, 43(3): 265-274. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	CHEN Z, JIANG J Y, SHU L Z, et al. Combined transcriptomic and metabolic analyses reveal potential mechanism for fruit development and quality control of Chinese raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu)[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2021, 40(10): 1923-1946.
[33]	LI X B, SUN J, CHEN Z, et al. Metabolite profile and genes/proteins expression in β-citraturin biosynthesis during fruit ripening in Chinese raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu)[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 163: 76-86.

种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source	种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source
Y1	丽水碧湖镇 Bihu Town, Lishui	Y11	丽水庆元 Qingyuan, Lishui
Y2	丽水大港头镇 Dagangtou Town, Lishui	Y12	金华兰溪 Lanxi, Jinhua
Y3	丽水老竹 Laozhu, Lishui	Y13	金华浦江 Pujiang, Jinhua
Y4	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y14	宁波宁海 Ninghai, Ningbo
Y5	丽水太平乡 Taiping Township, Lishui	Y15	杭州桐庐 Tonglu, Hangzhou
Y6	丽水松阳 Songyang, Lishui	Y16	杭州临岐 Linqi, Hangzhou
Y7	丽水丽新 Lixin, Lishui	Y17	台州天台 Tiantai, Taizhou
Y8	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou	Y18	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou
Y9	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y19	金华磐安 Pan’an, Jinhua
Y10	丽水云和 Yunhe, Lishui	Y20	温州乐清 Yueqing, Wenzhou

种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source	种质资源 Germplasm resource	来源 Source
Y1	丽水碧湖镇 Bihu Town, Lishui	Y11	丽水庆元 Qingyuan, Lishui
Y2	丽水大港头镇 Dagangtou Town, Lishui	Y12	金华兰溪 Lanxi, Jinhua
Y3	丽水老竹 Laozhu, Lishui	Y13	金华浦江 Pujiang, Jinhua
Y4	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y14	宁波宁海 Ninghai, Ningbo
Y5	丽水太平乡 Taiping Township, Lishui	Y15	杭州桐庐 Tonglu, Hangzhou
Y6	丽水松阳 Songyang, Lishui	Y16	杭州临岐 Linqi, Hangzhou
Y7	丽水丽新 Lixin, Lishui	Y17	台州天台 Tiantai, Taizhou
Y8	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou	Y18	杭州淳安 Chun’an, Hangzhou
Y9	丽水雅溪 Yaxi, Lishui	Y19	金华磐安 Pan’an, Jinhua
Y10	丽水云和 Yunhe, Lishui	Y20	温州乐清 Yueqing, Wenzhou

种质资源 Germplasm resource	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
Y1	2.45 ±0.19	密集 Dense	7	0.99 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.2	4.7 ±0.3	7.2 ±0.5	6±1	3.1 ±0.1	渐尖 Taper	1.04 ±0.33	193 ±16
Y2	2.42 ±0.18	中等 Middling	5	1.10 ±0.07	4.7 ±0.2	4.0 ±0.3	5.9 ±1.8	7±1	2.7 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.73 ±0.16	140 ±22
Y3	2.34 ±0.34	密集 Dense	7	1.07 ±0.09	6.2 ±0.3	4.7 ±0.4	5.0 ±1.0	7±2	4.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.63 ±0.20	184 ±25
Y4	2.38 ±0.28	中等 Middling	5	1.14 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.0 ±1.0	6±2	2.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	1.17 ±0.25	147 ±31
Y5	2.70 ±0.48	中等 Middling	7	1.19 ±0.14	5.5 ±0.2	5.0 ±0.4	6.0 ±1.0	8±2	3.0 ±0.2	截平 Truncation	1.28 ±0.28	220 ±11
Y6	2.71 ±0.20	中等 Middling	5	1.30 ±0.12	4.5 ±0.1	5.6 ±0.8	6.4 ±0.8	6±1	2.9 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.47 ±0.10	98 ±14
Y7	3.20 ±0.11	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.25 ±0.08	4.6 ±0.2	5.1 ±0.8	4.5 ±0.5	10±2	/	/	/	/
Y8	2.77 ±0.33	密集 Dense	7	1.17 ±0.13	5.0 ±0.3	5.4 ±0.5	6.2 ±0.6	7±1	3.6 ±0.1	截平 Truncation	1.50 ±0.29	198 ±28
Y9	2.31 ±0.53	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.01 ±0.09	4.7 ±0.6	4.7 ±0.6	5.4 ±0.6	8±2	2.9 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.95 ±0.14	199 ±34
Y10	2.53 ±0.48	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.13 ±0.16	4.4 ±0.3	5.8 ±0.5	6.7 ±0.9	6±1	4.0 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	1.12 ±0.28	94 ±18
Y11	1.90 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	0.85 ±0.10	5.0 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.3 ±1.3	12±3	3.7 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.44 ±0.16	46 ±11
Y12	2.56 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	1.13 ±0.14	4.6 ±0.2	4.6 ±0.3	6.7 ±1.3	8±2	3.6 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	0.70 ±0.28	57 ±15
Y13	3.18 ±0.59	密集 Dense	7	1.08 ±0.12	5.2 ±0.3	5.3 ±0.6	5.5 ±1.1	10±4	3.3 ±0.3	渐尖 Taper	1.31 ±0.33	67 ±22
Y14	3.16 ±0.15	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.19 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	5.2 ±0.3	5.7 ±1.1	9±2	3.5 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.80 ±0.26	96 ±15
Y15	2.21 ±0.33	中等 Middling	7	0.84 ±0.15	4.5 ±0.3	4.4 ±0.5	5.5 ±0.7	11±1	2.3 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.56 ±0.09	80 ±16
Y16	2.86 ±0.46	密集 Dense	7	1.09 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	3.8 ±0.2	4.9 ±0.8	12±4	3.0 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.62 ±0.19	134 ±26
Y17	2.86 ±0.71	密集 Dense	5	1.08 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.8 ±0.6	4.9 ±0.6	9±2	2.2 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.67 ±0.23	108 ±19
Y18	2.43 ±0.39	中等 Middling	5	0.96 ±0.08	4.9 ±0.3	4.0 ±0.1	5.3 ±0.4	8±2	2.5 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.64 ±0.15	137 ±26
Y19	2.65 ±0.29	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.03 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.1	4.8 ±0.6	6.8 ±1.2	9±2	3.1 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.12	133 ±21
Y20	1.80 ±0.25	中等 Middling	7	0.85 ±0.14	4.0 ±0.3	5.0 ±0.3	4.8 ±0.8	14±3	1.6 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.15	147 ±17

种质资源 Germplasm resource	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
Y1	2.45 ±0.19	密集 Dense	7	0.99 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.2	4.7 ±0.3	7.2 ±0.5	6±1	3.1 ±0.1	渐尖 Taper	1.04 ±0.33	193 ±16
Y2	2.42 ±0.18	中等 Middling	5	1.10 ±0.07	4.7 ±0.2	4.0 ±0.3	5.9 ±1.8	7±1	2.7 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.73 ±0.16	140 ±22
Y3	2.34 ±0.34	密集 Dense	7	1.07 ±0.09	6.2 ±0.3	4.7 ±0.4	5.0 ±1.0	7±2	4.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.63 ±0.20	184 ±25
Y4	2.38 ±0.28	中等 Middling	5	1.14 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.0 ±1.0	6±2	2.3 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	1.17 ±0.25	147 ±31
Y5	2.70 ±0.48	中等 Middling	7	1.19 ±0.14	5.5 ±0.2	5.0 ±0.4	6.0 ±1.0	8±2	3.0 ±0.2	截平 Truncation	1.28 ±0.28	220 ±11
Y6	2.71 ±0.20	中等 Middling	5	1.30 ±0.12	4.5 ±0.1	5.6 ±0.8	6.4 ±0.8	6±1	2.9 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.47 ±0.10	98 ±14
Y7	3.20 ±0.11	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.25 ±0.08	4.6 ±0.2	5.1 ±0.8	4.5 ±0.5	10±2	/	/	/	/
Y8	2.77 ±0.33	密集 Dense	7	1.17 ±0.13	5.0 ±0.3	5.4 ±0.5	6.2 ±0.6	7±1	3.6 ±0.1	截平 Truncation	1.50 ±0.29	198 ±28
Y9	2.31 ±0.53	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.01 ±0.09	4.7 ±0.6	4.7 ±0.6	5.4 ±0.6	8±2	2.9 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.95 ±0.14	199 ±34
Y10	2.53 ±0.48	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.13 ±0.16	4.4 ±0.3	5.8 ±0.5	6.7 ±0.9	6±1	4.0 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	1.12 ±0.28	94 ±18
Y11	1.90 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	0.85 ±0.10	5.0 ±0.4	4.4 ±0.1	5.3 ±1.3	12±3	3.7 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.44 ±0.16	46 ±11
Y12	2.56 ±0.37	密集 Dense	7	1.13 ±0.14	4.6 ±0.2	4.6 ±0.3	6.7 ±1.3	8±2	3.6 ±0.2	渐尖 Taper	0.70 ±0.28	57 ±15
Y13	3.18 ±0.59	密集 Dense	7	1.08 ±0.12	5.2 ±0.3	5.3 ±0.6	5.5 ±1.1	10±4	3.3 ±0.3	渐尖 Taper	1.31 ±0.33	67 ±22
Y14	3.16 ±0.15	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.19 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	5.2 ±0.3	5.7 ±1.1	9±2	3.5 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.80 ±0.26	96 ±15
Y15	2.21 ±0.33	中等 Middling	7	0.84 ±0.15	4.5 ±0.3	4.4 ±0.5	5.5 ±0.7	11±1	2.3 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.56 ±0.09	80 ±16
Y16	2.86 ±0.46	密集 Dense	7	1.09 ±0.17	4.4 ±0.2	3.8 ±0.2	4.9 ±0.8	12±4	3.0 ±0.3	近球 Subglobose	0.62 ±0.19	134 ±26
Y17	2.86 ±0.71	密集 Dense	5	1.08 ±0.11	4.6 ±0.4	4.8 ±0.6	4.9 ±0.6	9±2	2.2 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.67 ±0.23	108 ±19
Y18	2.43 ±0.39	中等 Middling	5	0.96 ±0.08	4.9 ±0.3	4.0 ±0.1	5.3 ±0.4	8±2	2.5 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.64 ±0.15	137 ±26
Y19	2.65 ±0.29	稀疏 Sparse	5	1.03 ±0.12	4.6 ±0.1	4.8 ±0.6	6.8 ±1.2	9±2	3.1 ±0.2	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.12	133 ±21
Y20	1.80 ±0.25	中等 Middling	7	0.85 ±0.14	4.0 ±0.3	5.0 ±0.3	4.8 ±0.8	14±3	1.6 ±0.1	近球 Subglobose	0.61 ±0.15	147 ±17

参数Parameter	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
最小值Minimum	1.80	0	5.00	0.84	4.35	3.80	4.55	5.00	1.57	1.00	0.44	0
最大值Maximum	3.20	30.00	7.00	1.30	6.18	5.77	7.16	12.00	4.28	3.00	1.50	220.40
平均值Average value	2.57	20.82	6.00	1.07	4.87	4.78	5.64	8.35	3.03	2.11	0.83	121.15
标准差Standard deviation	0.37	7.80	1.00	0.13	0.47	0.51	0.73	2.08	0.66	0.55	0.30	54.88
变异系数CV/%	14.41	37.44	16.67	11.64	9.68	10.60	12.92	24.86	21.92	26.22	36.60	45.30

Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 33

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

性状Trait	SD	ND	NLL	BD	FD	BP	PS	SBN	FSL	FS	SFW
ND	-0.143
NLL	-0.230	0.083
BD	0.732^**	-0.289	-0.116
FD	-0.067	0.129	0.224	0.197
BP	0.334	-0.339	0.334	0.456^*	0.311
PS	-0.020	-0.123	-0.088	0.110	0.194	0.286
SBN	-0.139	0.183	-0.008	-0.531^*	-0.401	-0.247	-0.527^*
FSL	-0.095	0.144	-0.050	-0.014	0.670^**	0.135	0.529^*	-0.290
FS	-0.217	0.221	-0.283	-0.297	0.258	-0.032	0.458^*	-0.150	0.569^**
SFW	0.100	0.100	0.090	0.133	0.339	0.271	0.348	-0.368	0.493^*	0.282
FY	-0.220	0.028	0.221	-0.046	-0.033	-0.110	0.221	-0.349	0.239	-0.008	0.626^**

性状 Trait	主成分Principal component
性状 Trait	1	2	3	4	5
SD	0.109	-0.764	-0.279	-0.047	0.413
ND	-0.045	0.532	-0.003	0.200	0.681
NLL	0.070	0.027	0.840	0.401	-0.101
BD	0.352	-0.845	-0.089	-0.052	0.243
FD	0.654	0.084	0.041	0.592	0.152
BP	0.459	-0.539	0.185	0.400	-0.263
PS	0.709	0.082	-0.226	-0.183	-0.395
SBN	-0.720	0.264	-0.036	0.241	0.063
FSL	0.770	0.368	-0.192	0.194	0.065
FS	0.463	0.549	-0.516	0.066	-0.113
SFW	0.729	0.119	0.254	-0.254	0.289
FY	0.410	0.250	0.555	-0.629	0.108
特征值Eigenvalue	3.310	2.468	1.556	1.309	1.069
贡献率	27.58	20.57	12.96	10.91	8.91
Contribution rate/%
累积贡献率	27.58	48.15	61.11	72.02	80.93
Cumulative contribution rate/%

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	总多酚含量 Total polyphenols content	总黄酮含量 Total flavone content	总多糖含量 Total polysaccharides content	鞣花酸含量 Ellagic acid content	椴树苷含量 Tiliroside content	山柰酚-3-O-芸香糖苷含量 Kaempferol- 3-O-rutinoside content
Y1	8.41±0.08	1.09±0.02	3.16±0.03	0.393±0.001	0.056±0.001	0.061±0.001
Y2	10.36±0.05	1.57±0.03	3.48±0.03	0.508±0.001	0.046±0.001	0.037±0.001
Y3	9.81±0.04	2.06±0.04	4.12±0.02	0.516±0.002	0.030±0.001	0.058±0.001
Y4	7.80±0.10	1.38±0.01	2.68±0.01	0.395±0.001	0.026±0.001	0.033±0.001
Y5	9.31±0.04	1.37±0.02	2.79±0.03	0.341±0.001	0.036±0.001	0.040±0.001
Y6	10.57±0.11	1.81±0.01	4.31±0.01	0.424±0.001	0.029±0.001	0.046±0.001
Y7	/	/	/	/	/	/
Y8	7.15±0.16	0.94±0.01	2.50±0.02	0.259±0.001	0.031±0.001	0.035±0.001
Y9	10.06±0.16	1.43±0.04	3.24±0.04	0.509±0.002	0.030±0.001	0.075±0.001
Y10	10.23±0.06	2.48±0.02	3.70±0.04	0.725±0.001	0.032±0.001	0.057±0.001
Y11	7.37±0.09	1.21±0.03	2.28±0.02	0.284±0.001	0.043±0.001	0.045±0.001
Y12	8.51±0.07	1.85±0.01	2.81±0.12	0.424±0.002	0.056±0.001	0.060±0.001
Y13	8.02±0.01	1.58±0.02	2.41±0.05	0.533±0.001	0.044±0.001	0.091±0.001
Y14	8.78±0.07	1.14±0.04	2.50±0.03	0.341±0.001	0.036±0.001	0.067±0.001
Y15	8.66±0.03	1.57±0.02	2.96±0.02	0.501±0.001	0.039±0.001	0.078±0.001
Y16	12.01±0.06	1.66±0.01	3.36±0.04	0.491±0.002	0.052±0.001	0.099±0.001
Y17	8.38±0.09	1.14±0.01	3.53±0.03	0.446±0.001	0.036±0.001	0.097±0.001
Y18	9.55±0.14	1.22±0.05	3.35±0.06	0.501±0.004	0.043±0.002	0.080±0.002
Y19	9.79±0.14	1.95±0.01	3.76±0.01	0.499±0.001	0.020±0.001	0.069±0.001
Y20	8.89±0.10	1.31±0.02	3.06±0.09	0.341±0.001	0.080±0.001	0.114±0.002
平均值Average value	9.14	1.51	3.11	0.444	0.040	0.065
标准差Standard deviation	1.19	0.38	0.57	0.11	0.01	0.02
变异系数CV	13.02	25.02	18.31	23.67	33.68	35.14

主成分 Principal component	总多酚含量 Total polyphenols content	总黄酮含量 Total flavone content	总多糖含量 Total polysaccharides content	鞣花酸含量 Ellagic acid content	椴树苷含量 Tiliroside content	山柰酚-3-O-芸香糖苷含量 Kaempferol-3-O- rutinoside content	特征值 Eigenvalue	贡献率 Contribution rate/%	累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/%
PC1	0.875	0.861	0.842	0.824	0.076	-0.286	2.982	49.70	49.70
PC2	-0.090	-0.059	0.117	0.238	0.896	0.815	1.550	25.82	75.52

种质资源 Germplasm resource	F1	F2	F	排序 Ranking
Y1	-0.94	0.69	-0.29	13
Y2	1.39	-0.40	0.59	5
Y3	2.16	-0.57	0.93	3
Y4	-1.11	-1.67	-0.98	17
Y5	-0.67	-1.16	-0.64	15
Y6	1.99	-1.07	0.72	4
Y7	/	/	/	/
Y8	-2.69	-1.56	-1.74	19
Y9	0.58	-0.19	0.24	9
Y10	3.46	-0.24	1.66	1
Y11	-2.36	-0.70	-1.35	18
Y12	-0.07	0.58	0.12	10
Y13	-0.74	1.02	-0.10	12
Y14	-1.61	-0.38	-0.90	16
Y15	-0.09	0.37	0.05	11
Y16	1.59	1.48	1.17	2
Y17	-1.50	0.63	-0.58	14
Y18	0.15	0.72	0.26	8
Y19	1.53	-0.85	0.54	6
Y20	-1.07	3.27	0.31	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	病害数 Number of disease	害虫侵害数 Infestation number
Y1	1	1
Y2	0	0
Y3	0	0
Y4	0	2
Y5	0	0
Y6	0	1
Y7	1	0
Y8	0	2
Y9	0	1
Y10	1	1
Y11	0	0
Y12	0	2
Y13	1	3
Y14	0	1
Y15	1	0
Y16	1	2
Y17	0	1
Y18	1	2
Y19	0	1
Y20	1	1
总感染率/病害率	4.00	10.50
Overall infection/ disease rate/%

种质资源 Germplasm resource	萌芽期 Stages in germination (month-day)		生长期 Growing stage (month-day)		花期 Flowering stage (month-day)		幼果期 Young fruit stage (month-day)		熟果期 Ripe fruit stage (month-day)
种质资源 Germplasm resource	始芽 Early bud	盛芽 Full bud	始叶 Early leaves	盛叶 Full leaves	始花 Early bloom	盛花 Full bloom	始果 Early productiv	盛果 Full productive	始果 Early productive	盛果 Full productive
Y3	02-09	02-21	03-08	03-20	03-19	04-01	04-08	04-22	04-28	05-11
Y3母株	02-07	02-18	03-05	03-15	03-17	03-27	04-05	04-20	04-25	05-09
Y3 stock plant
Y9	02-05	02-16	03-02	03-13	03-15	03-25	04-07	04-19	04-23	05-07
Y9母株	02-05	02-18	03-04	03-12	03-18	03-25	04-08	04-21	04-26	05-05
Y9 stock plant

种质资源 Germplasm resources	SD/cm	ND	NLL	BD/cm	FD/cm	BP/cm	PS/cm	SBN	FSL/cm	FS	SFW/g	FY/g
Y3	2.34	密集 Dense	7	1.07	6.2	4.7	5	7	4.3	近球 Subglobose	0.63	184
Y3母株 Y3 stock plant	2.29	密集 Dense	7	1.11	5.9	4.8	5.2	8	4.1	近球 Subglobose	0.65	170
Y9	2.31	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.01	4.7	4.7	5.4	8	2.9	近球 Subglobose	0.95	199
Y9母株 Y9 stock plant	2.37	稀疏 Sparse	7	1.08	4.9	4.5	5.1	9	3	近球 Subglobose	0.99	210

[1]	WAN Shaoyuan, LIU Xianbo, CAI Shuo, SHI Hong, CHENG Jie. Effect of irrigation and planting methods on the yield and quality of double-cropping rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 257-268.
[2]	LI Jianqiang, WEI Qianqian, LIU Xiaoxia, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunquan. Effects of optimizing fertilization methods on rice yield and soil nutrient balance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 438-446.
[3]	HAN Xiao, LIU Xujie, SHI Lyu, ZHANG Jin, SHAN Haiyong, SHI Xiaoxu, YAN Yini, LIU Jian, XUE Yaguang. Effects of reduced application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, quality and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under concentrated coverage of wheat straw between rows for returning to field [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 1-13.
[4]	LI Tengfei, YANG Guiling, RUAN Meiying, CHU Tianfen, QIN Hua, DENG Meihua. Effects of fertilizer and pesticide managements on soil health and tomato qualities in greenhouse tomato cultivation [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 145-158.
[5]	ZHANG Yuanyuan, FENG Juling, XIAO Jingfeng, GUAN Yu, LONG Chuer, YAO Lirong, MENG Yaxiong, SI Erjing, LI Baochun, MA Xiaole, WANG Huajun, ZHOU Xirong, LIU Meijin, WANG Juncheng. Genetic diversity and association analysis between agronomic traits and SSR markers in hulless barley [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 1977-1989.
[6]	CHEN Yutiao, YAN Chuan, HONG Xiaofu, SONG Jiayu. Effects of submergence at tillering stage on growth characters, yield formation and potassium uptake of japonica inbred rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999.
[7]	MIN Jiangyan, TANG Zhuolei, YANG Xue, HUANG Xiaoyan, HUANG Kaifeng, HE Peiyun. Effect of different drought-rewatering modes on growth and yield of Tartary buckwheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2000-2009.
[8]	SHEN Shengfa, XIANG Chao, MENG Yusha, LI Bing, WU Liehong. Breeding, yield and quality characteristics of Zheshu 86, a sweetpotato variety with high photosynthetic efficiency [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1469-1480.
[9]	PAN Zhijun, WU Xiaowen, WU Chenyang, CHENG Yu, CHEN Long, ZHANG Xiaohong, ZHANG Jinshan, ZHOU Bing, JIANG Bo, ZHANG Wenjing, CHE Zhao, SONG He. Analysis of yield and utilization of temperature and light resources of different types of ratoon rice varieties in central Anhui, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1492-1501.
[10]	LI Hui, TAN Xiaoqin, TANG Qian, YANG Yang, CHEN Wei. Effects of flower thinning on yield and quality components of Zi Yan tea plants [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1602-1615.
[11]	HU Tiejun. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer application on yield, quality, and soil properties of broccoli [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665.
[12]	XU Liting, QI Guangping, KANG Yanxia, YIN Minhua, MA Yanlin, JIA Qiong, WANG Jinghai, JIANG Yuanbo. Meta-analysis of effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of alfalfa [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.
[13]	ZHAO Liming, WANG Yaxin, JIANG Wenxin, DUAN Shaobiao, SHEN Xuefeng, ZHENG Dianfeng, FENG Naijie. Effects of plant growth regulators on yield, quality and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality japonica rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
[14]	GAO Hu, MU Xiaoguo, LI Haijun, GAO Fucheng, ZHANG Ying, LI Jianshe, YE Lin. Effect of Fenlong tillage on soil characteristics and cabbage yield in dam land [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123.
[15]	XUE Xianbin, JIA Qiong, CHEN Zhengfeng, LI Ruiyuan, CHEN Qingfu, SHI Taoxiong. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characteristics of recombinant inbred lines of Tartary buckwheat based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 748-759.

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7

种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking	种质资源 Germplasm resource	果产量 Fruit yield/g	排名 Ranking
Y1	193	4	Y11	46	19
Y2	140	8	Y12	57	18
Y3	184	5	Y13	67	17
Y4	147	6	Y14	96	14
Y5	220	1	Y15	80	16
Y6	98	13	Y16	134	10
Y7	0	20	Y17	108	12
Y8	198	3	Y18	137	9
Y9	199	2	Y19	133	11
Y10	94	15	Y20	147	7