Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer application on yield, quality, and soil properties of broccoli

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230430

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1657-1665.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230430

• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer application on yield, quality, and soil properties of broccoli

HU Tiejun()

Yuyao Agricultural Technology Extension Service Station, Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, China

Received:2023-03-30 Online:2024-07-25 Published:2024-08-05

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore a suitable fertilization method, which could both reduce the input of chemical fertilizers and increase the efficiency of broccoli production, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different fertilization modes on the yield, quality, fertilizer utilization efficiency, and soil nutrients and enzymes activities of broccoli. There were four treatments: CK, no fertilizer applied; W1, conventional fertilization mode; W2, chemical fertilizer reduction by 10% (compared with the W1 treatment, the same as below)+microbial fertilizer 1 200 kg·hm^-2; W3, chemical fertilizer reduction by 20%+microbial fertilizer 1 500 kg·hm^-2; W4, chemical fertilizer reduction by 30%+microbial fertilizer 1 800 kg·hm^-2. The results showed that compared with the conventional fertilization mode, application of appropriate reduction of chemical fertilizer combined with microbial fertilizer could improve the biological traits and yield of broccoli, improve its quality, increase the utilization efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizers, and enhance the soil nutrients content and enzymes activities. The subordinate function method was used to comprehensively evaluate the characteristics and quality of broccoli under different fertilization modes, and the W3 treatment exhibited the best performance, as well as the highest economic benefit, which could be promoted in agricultural production.

Key words: broccoli, chemical fertilizer reduction, yield, quality, soil nutrient

CLC Number:

S606.2

HU Tiejun. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer application on yield, quality, and soil properties of broccoli[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1657-1665.

Figures/Tables 10

References 22

[1]	王建升, 沈钰森, 虞慧芳, 等. 西兰花浙青80的高效制种与纯度鉴定技术[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(1): 75-78.
	WANG J S, SHEN Y S, YU H F, et al. Efficient seed production and purity identification technology of broccoli cultivar Zheqing 80[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(1): 75-78.(in Chinese)
[2]	武兴友. 微生物菌肥对农业生产的影响及研究趋势分析[J]. 中国果菜, 2018, 38(4): 9-11.
	WU X Y. Analysis of the effect on microbial fertilizer on agricultural production and research trends[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2018, 38(4): 9-11.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	吴珏, 王伟群, 瞿洁, 等. 化肥减量配施微生物肥料对青菜生长的影响[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2020(2): 52-54.
	WU J, WANG W Q, QU J, et al. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer combined with microbial fertilizer on the growth of Chinese cabbage[J]. Shanghai Vegetables, 2020(2): 52-54.(in Chinese)
[4]	刘华, 李明, 田永强, 等. 化肥减量配施微生物肥对黄芪生长及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022(1): 67-70.
	LIU H, LI M, TIAN Y Q, et al. Effects of reducing chemical fertilizer combined with microbial fertilizer on the growth and yield of Astragalus membranaceus[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022(1): 67-70.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[6]	茹朝, 郁继华, 武玥, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对露地大白菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637.
	RU C, YU J H, WU Y, et al. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying bio-organic fertilizer on yield and quality of Chinese cabbage in open field[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1626-1637.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	刘彦均, 李菊, 高天科, 等. 生物有机肥部分代替化肥对结球甘蓝养分吸收分配、品质和产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(6): 88-96.
	LIU Y J, LI J, GAO T K, et al. Effect of partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with bio-organic fertilizers on nutrient utilization, quality and yield of cabbage[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2022, 57(6): 88-96.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[9]	关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
[10]	缪桂红, 高建国, 赵丹, 等. 复合微生物肥替代化肥在如东县西兰花上的应用效果试验初报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2019(6): 104-105.
	MIAO G H, GAO J G, ZHAO D, et al. Preliminary report on the application effect of compound microbial fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer in broccoli in Rudong County[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(6): 104-105.(in Chinese)
[11]	朱望帅, 韩震, 胡一涵, 等. 化肥减施配施微生物菌肥对盐碱地土壤质量及玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(12): 91-96.
	ZHU W S, HAN Z, HU Y H, et al. Effects of fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer on soil quality and maize yield and quality in saline-alkali land[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 54(12): 91-96.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	孙梅, 孙耿, 马颢榴, 等. 氨基酸叶面肥对不同蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2018(2): 34-37.
	SUN M, SUN G, MA H L, et al. Effects of amino acid foliar fertilizer on yield and quality of different vegetables[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2018(2): 34-37.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	杨志刚, 叶英杰, 常海文, 等. 微生物菌肥及土壤修复剂对干制辣椒生长、品质及产量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(19): 1-7.
	YANG Z G, YE Y J, CHANG H W, et al. Effects of microbial fertilizer and soil amendment on the growth, quality and yield of dry pepper[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(19): 1-7.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	谢静静. 化肥减量配施生物菌肥对不结球白菜生长及产量和品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015.
	XIE J J. Effects of bio-bacterial manure with reduction of chemical fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of non-heading Chinese cabbage[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	张玉霞, 张国平, 钟攀, 等. 不同肥料组合对生姜产量和品质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2007, 39(6): 973-977.
	ZHANG Y X, ZHANG G P, ZHONG P, et al. Effect of different fertilizer combinations on yield and quality of ginger[J]. Soils, 2007, 39(6): 973-977.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	沈莹, 高强, 时超, 等. 双孢菇菌糠微生物菌肥对叶菜品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2014(12): 55-58.
	SHEN Y, GAO Q, SHI C, et al. Effect of Agaricus bisporus residue microorganism bacterial manure on the quality of leaf vegetables[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014(12): 55-58.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	何宇, 吕卫光, 李双喜, 等. γ-聚谷氨酸发酵液对小白菜生长及氮磷肥料利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 329-337.
	HE Y, LYU W G, LI S X, et al. Effects of γ-polyglutamic acid fermentation broth on growth of pakchoi and utilization rate of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 329-337.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	胡铁军, 张怀杰. 化肥减量配施微生物肥对稻麦轮作养分吸收、周年产量和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(1): 99-103.
	HU T J, ZHANG H J. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer on nutrient absorption, annual yield and soil nutrients in rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(1): 99-103.(in Chinese)
[19]	张杰, 马亚君, 贺志斌, 等. 微生物肥料替代化肥在苹果种植中的应用效果研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(7): 128-135.
	ZHANG J, MA Y J, HE Z B, et al. Application of microbial fertilizer instead of fertilizer in apple planting[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 128-135.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	王燕云, 赵龙杰, 郝春莉, 等. 生物有机肥对不同连作年限设施黄瓜土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 631-638.
	WANG Y Y, ZHAO L J, HAO C L, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil microbial population and enzymes activities under different continuous cropping years of protected cucumber[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31(4): 631-638.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	殷琳毅, 李进, 袁春新, 等. 生物有机肥替代化肥对土壤及荠菜产量、品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(1): 85-89.
	YIN L Y, LI J, YUAN C X, et al. Bioorganic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer affects the soil and shepherd’s purse yield and quality[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(1): 85-89.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	赵玲玉, 索升州, 赵祺, 等. 梭梭根际促生菌(PGPR)菌肥对番茄产量、品质和土壤特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(3): 42-51.
	ZHAO L Y, SUO S Z, ZHAO Q, et al. Effects of biofertilizers with PGPR strains from rhizosphere of Haloxylon ammodendron on fruit yield, quality and soil characteristics of tomato[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2022, 57(3): 42-51.(in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/ cm	花球横径 Transverse diamter of curd/cm	花球纵径 Height of curd in longitudinal section/cm	花球重 Curd weight/kg	产量 Yield/ (t·hm^-2)
CK	31.24 d	10.81 c	10.16 c	0.34 d	13.12 d
W1	40.51 c	13.83 b	12.57 b	0.43 c	15.81 c
W2	44.13 ab	15.95 a	13.94 ab	0.48 ab	17.13 ab
W3	45.97 a	16.32 a	14.21 a	0.49 a	17.96 a
W4	43.33 b	15.44 a	13.28 b	0.46 b	16.88 b

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/ cm	花球横径 Transverse diamter of curd/cm	花球纵径 Height of curd in longitudinal section/cm	花球重 Curd weight/kg	产量 Yield/ (t·hm^-2)
CK	31.24 d	10.81 c	10.16 c	0.34 d	13.12 d
W1	40.51 c	13.83 b	12.57 b	0.43 c	15.81 c
W2	44.13 ab	15.95 a	13.94 ab	0.48 ab	17.13 ab
W3	45.97 a	16.32 a	14.21 a	0.49 a	17.96 a
W4	43.33 b	15.44 a	13.28 b	0.46 b	16.88 b

处理 Treatment	产量 Yield/(t·hm^-2)	产值 Output/(yuan·hm^-2)	肥料成本 Fertilizer cost/(yuan·hm^-2)	收入 Income/(yuan·hm^-2)
CK	13.12	52 471.80	0	52 471.80
W1	15.81	63 225.60	5 272.05	57 953.55
W2	17.13	68 533.80	8 344.80	60 189.00
W3	17.96	71 847.00	8 717.70	63 129.30
W4	16.88	67 537.20	9 090.45	58 446.75

处理 Treatment	产量 Yield/(t·hm^-2)	产值 Output/(yuan·hm^-2)	肥料成本 Fertilizer cost/(yuan·hm^-2)	收入 Income/(yuan·hm^-2)
CK	13.12	52 471.80	0	52 471.80
W1	15.81	63 225.60	5 272.05	57 953.55
W2	17.13	68 533.80	8 344.80	60 189.00
W3	17.96	71 847.00	8 717.70	63 129.30
W4	16.88	67 537.20	9 090.45	58 446.75

处理 Treatment	Ph	TD	LH	CW	Y	V_C	SS	Ni	CF	SP	TC	M	排名 Ranking
CK	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.00	0	0	0.09	5
W1	0.63	0.55	0.59	0.60	0.56	0.65	0.52	1.00	0.53	1.00	0.32	0.63	4
W2	0.88	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.83	0.78	0.81	0.94	0.42	0.88	0.62	0.81	2
W3	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.83	0.15	0.66	1.00	0.88	1
W4	0.82	0.84	0.77	0.80	0.78	0.71	0.73	0.75	0	0.36	0.56	0.65	3

Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer application on yield, quality, and soil properties of broccoli

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 22

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

处理 Treatment	氮素吸收量 N uptake/ (kg·hm^-2)	氮肥表观利用率 Apparent N recovery efficiency/%	氮肥农学效率 N agronomic efficiency/ (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity for applied N/(kg·kg^-1)
CK	124.21 c	—	—	—
W1	204.60 a	28.66 b	9.58 c	56.35 d
W2	201.38 ab	30.57 b	15.91 b	67.87 c
W3	206.99 a	36.89 a	21.59 a	80.04 b
W4	189.81 b	33.41 ab	19.18 a	85.99 a

处理 Treatment	磷素吸收量 P uptake/ (kg·hm^-2)	磷肥表观利用率 Apparent P recovery efficiency/%	磷肥农学效率 P agronomic efficiency/ (kg·kg^-1)	磷肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity for applied P/(kg·kg^-1)
CK	60.12 d	—	—	—
W1	106.46 b	16.52 b	9.58 c	56.35 d
W2	107.93 b	18.94 b	15.91 b	67.87 c
W3	111.44 a	22.87 a	21.59 a	80.04 b
W4	100.21 c	20.42 a	19.18 a	85.99 a

处理 Treatment	钾素吸收量 K uptake/ (kg·hm^-2)	钾肥表观利用率 Apparent K recovery efficiency/%	钾肥农学效率 K agronomic efficiency/ (kg·kg^-1)	钾肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity for applied K/(kg·kg^-1)
CK	223.18 d	—	—	—
W1	322.65 b	35.46 c	9.58 c	56.35 d
W2	331.66 a	42.97 b	15.91 b	67.87 c
W3	332.31 a	48.63 a	21.59 a	80.04 b
W4	313.09 c	45.79 ab	19.18 a	85.99 a

处理 Treatment	pH	有机质含量 Organic matter content/(g·kg^-1)	碱解氮含量 Alkali hydrolyzed nitrogen content/(mg·kg^-1)	有效磷含量 Available phosphorus content/(mg·kg^-1)	速效钾含量 Available potassium content/(mg·kg^-1)
CK	5.98 a	15.15 c	101.51 c	10.94 c	105.13 e
W1	5.86 a	15.37 c	109.65 b	12.46 b	116.24 d
W2	5.91 a	16.92 b	113.24 b	12.87 b	121.35 c
W3	5.98 a	18.33 a	119.72 a	13.52 ab	127.64 b
W4	5.97 a	19.52 a	122.56 a	13.97 a	132.31 a

处理 Treatment	蔗糖酶活性 Sucrase activity/ (mg·g^-1)	脲酶活性 Urease activity/ (mg·g^-1)	过氧化氢酶活性 Catalase activity/ (mg·g^-1)	纤维素酶活性 Cellulase activity/ (mg·g^-1)
CK	13.08 d	1.52 c	0.64 d	58.14 d
W1	15.47 c	1.68 b	0.78 c	62.47 c
W2	18.92 b	1.72 b	0.84 bc	67.35 b
W3	20.34 a	1.88 a	0.96 a	71.94 a
W4	19.02 ab	1.97 a	0.88 b	69.43 ab

[1]	XU Weimeng, XU Yan, CHEN Guoli. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848.
[2]	WU Ju, YANG Fei, WU Guoquan, FU Xian, XU Chenguang. Effects of sand culture and soil culture on growth, yield, and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913.
[3]	ZHU Weijing, WU Jia, HONG Chunlai, ZHU Fengxiang, HONG Leidong, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Shuo, ZHU Huifen. Effects of straw mulching on water, heat, fertility status of soil and yield and quality of flat peach [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932.
[4]	HE Shixiong, YANG Lei, QI Anmin, CHENG Ji, WANG Min, LI Yingkui, HONG Lin. Effects of interstock on leaf photosynthetic characteristics, physicochemical properties and fruit quality of three mandarin hybrids [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693.
[5]	ZHANG Shunchang, XU Jigen, FU Chengyue, PU Zhanxu, HU Lipeng, WU Hao, LI Junbing, XIN Liang, LEI Yuanjun. Effect of amino acid calcium spraying on peel cracking and quality of citrus hybrid Hongmeiren [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715.
[6]	ZHANG Zhiying, QIU Qin, HOU Lijuan, XU Ping, JIANG Ning, LIN Jinsheng, LI Huiping, QU Shaoxuan, MA Lin, WANG Weixia, LI Fuhou. Evaluation on the safety of insecticides application on Pleurotus pulmonarius and Auricularia cornea [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742.
[7]	YAN Fulin, LANG Yunhu, JIAN Yingquan, CHEN Xiongfei, WEI Wei, WANG Zhiwei, AN Jiangyong, REN Deqiang, DING Ning, WEI Shenghua. Response of yield and quality of Radix Ardisia to soil physiochemical properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775.
[8]	FENG Yiyu, REN Hongjie. Quantitative assessment of new quality productive forces in China’s livestock industry: based on panel data in 2007-2021 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1805-1816.
[9]	HUANG Xianke, HUANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Xiang, LI Min, CAI Yilong, CHEN Ran. Effects of oyster shells on the growth performance of Penaeus vannamei and water quality, and microbial community characteristics on shell surfaces [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1441-1450.
[10]	WANG Chengyang, LIU Jieya, WU Minyi, XIE Boyi, HONG Decheng, LENG Feng, WU Guoquan. Effect of calcium treatment on the fruit quality of Reliance grape under waterlogging [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458.
[11]	ZHANG Yuanyuan, LI Meng. The estimation of new quality productive forces level, developmental retardation and cultivation path of feed enterprises [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1580-1594.
[12]	ZHANG Ruonan, MEN Xiaoming, QIN Kaipeng, WANG Binbin, WU Jie, DING Xiangbin, XU Ziwei, QI Keke. Comparative study on growth performance, carcass quality, meat performance and profitability of different crossbreed combinations of Lvjiahei pigs [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211.
[13]	XIANG Ying, CONG Jianmin, PAN Danhong, TAO Yonggang. Comprehensive evaluation of the growth process of different tomato varieties under spring organic greenhouse planting [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261.
[14]	LIU Wenqi, HU Qizan, YUE Zhichen, TAO Peng, LEI Juanli, LI Biyuan, ZHAO Yanting, WANG Huasen. Effects of high temperature in summer on the appearance and nutritional quality of Brassica juncea [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1262-1271.
[15]	ZHANG Zhi, HE Haohao, YU Miao, XU Jianfeng. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with soil conditioner on soil acidity, soil nutrients and rice yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308.