Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 301-309.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240999
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Quan1,2(
), LI Hui1,2, YANG Jing1,2, XU Songlin1,2, ZHANG Shukang1,2, LIU Zhongxian2,3,*(
), HE Jinhui3,*(
)
Received:2024-11-21
Online:2026-02-25
Published:2026-03-24
CLC Number:
CHEN Quan, LI Hui, YANG Jing, XU Songlin, ZHANG Shukang, LIU Zhongxian, HE Jinhui. Identification of the pathogen causing mulberry snags rotten leaves disease and resistance of 47 mulberry varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 301-309.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240999
| 扩增区域 Amplified region | 正向引物序列(5'→3') Forward primer sequence (5'→3') | 反向引物序列(5'→3') Reverse primer sequence (5'→3') |
|---|---|---|
| ITS | TCCGTAGGTGAACCTTGCGG | TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC |
| ACT | ATGTGCAAGGCCGGTTTCGC | TACGAGTCCTTCTGGCCCAT |
| TUB | GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC | AACCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC |
| TEF | CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG | TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC |
Table 1 Primer information
| 扩增区域 Amplified region | 正向引物序列(5'→3') Forward primer sequence (5'→3') | 反向引物序列(5'→3') Reverse primer sequence (5'→3') |
|---|---|---|
| ITS | TCCGTAGGTGAACCTTGCGG | TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC |
| ACT | ATGTGCAAGGCCGGTTTCGC | TACGAGTCCTTCTGGCCCAT |
| TUB | GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC | AACCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC |
| TEF | CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG | TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC |
| 序号 Code | 品种 Cultivar | 序号 Code | 品种 Cultivar | 序号 Code | 品种 Cultivar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 农桑14号Nongsang 14 | 17 | 嘉陵20号Jialing 20 | 33 | 川桑33 Chuansang 33 |
| 2 | 油桑Yousang | 18 | 嘉陵16号Jialing 16 | 34 | 川桑90-4 Chuansang 90-4 |
| 3 | 桂优62 Guiyou 62 | 19 | 桐桑Tongsang | 35 | 川桑826 Chuansang 826 |
| 4 | 桂优12 Guiyou 12 | 20 | 821 821 | 36 | 川桑7657 Chuansang 7657 |
| 5 | 云桑1号Yunsang 1 | 21 | 实钴11-6 Shigu 11-6 | 37 | 川桑3723 Chuansang 3723 |
| 6 | 云桑2号Yunsang 2 | 22 | 西农751 Xinong 751 | 38 | 选一号Xuan 1 |
| 7 | 湖桑32号Husang 32 | 23 | 蓬1号Peng 1 | 39 | 丰田5号Fengtian 5 |
| 8 | 秋茗Qiuming | 24 | 蓬2号Peng 2 | 40 | 蔬菜桑Shucaisang |
| 9 | 农桑8号Nongsang 8 | 25 | 小冠桑Xiaoguansang | 41 | 青皮湖桑Qingpihusang |
| 10 | 双头荷叶白Shuangtouheyebai | 26 | 辅射1号Fushe 1 | 42 | 湖桑7号Husang 7 |
| 11 | 荷叶白Heyebai | 27 | 强桑1号Qiangsang 1 | 43 | 充场Chongchang |
| 12 | 北场1号Beichang 1 | 28 | 茶叶桑Chayesang | 44 | 南1号Nan 1 |
| 13 | 西农1号Xinong 1 | 29 | 川桑48-3 Chuansang 48-3 | 45 | 陕桑305 Shansang 305 |
| 14 | 育711 Yu 711 | 30 | 川桑98-1 Chuansang 98-1 | 46 | 渝桑101 Yusang 101 |
| 15 | 云11 Yun 11 | 31 | 台桑14-1 Taisang 14-1 | 47 | 饲料桑Siliaosang |
| 16 | 新之一濑Xinzhiyilai | 32 | 川桑39 Chuansang 39 |
Table 2 Mulberry cultivars used in this study
| 序号 Code | 品种 Cultivar | 序号 Code | 品种 Cultivar | 序号 Code | 品种 Cultivar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 农桑14号Nongsang 14 | 17 | 嘉陵20号Jialing 20 | 33 | 川桑33 Chuansang 33 |
| 2 | 油桑Yousang | 18 | 嘉陵16号Jialing 16 | 34 | 川桑90-4 Chuansang 90-4 |
| 3 | 桂优62 Guiyou 62 | 19 | 桐桑Tongsang | 35 | 川桑826 Chuansang 826 |
| 4 | 桂优12 Guiyou 12 | 20 | 821 821 | 36 | 川桑7657 Chuansang 7657 |
| 5 | 云桑1号Yunsang 1 | 21 | 实钴11-6 Shigu 11-6 | 37 | 川桑3723 Chuansang 3723 |
| 6 | 云桑2号Yunsang 2 | 22 | 西农751 Xinong 751 | 38 | 选一号Xuan 1 |
| 7 | 湖桑32号Husang 32 | 23 | 蓬1号Peng 1 | 39 | 丰田5号Fengtian 5 |
| 8 | 秋茗Qiuming | 24 | 蓬2号Peng 2 | 40 | 蔬菜桑Shucaisang |
| 9 | 农桑8号Nongsang 8 | 25 | 小冠桑Xiaoguansang | 41 | 青皮湖桑Qingpihusang |
| 10 | 双头荷叶白Shuangtouheyebai | 26 | 辅射1号Fushe 1 | 42 | 湖桑7号Husang 7 |
| 11 | 荷叶白Heyebai | 27 | 强桑1号Qiangsang 1 | 43 | 充场Chongchang |
| 12 | 北场1号Beichang 1 | 28 | 茶叶桑Chayesang | 44 | 南1号Nan 1 |
| 13 | 西农1号Xinong 1 | 29 | 川桑48-3 Chuansang 48-3 | 45 | 陕桑305 Shansang 305 |
| 14 | 育711 Yu 711 | 30 | 川桑98-1 Chuansang 98-1 | 46 | 渝桑101 Yusang 101 |
| 15 | 云11 Yun 11 | 31 | 台桑14-1 Taisang 14-1 | 47 | 饲料桑Siliaosang |
| 16 | 新之一濑Xinzhiyilai | 32 | 川桑39 Chuansang 39 |
Fig.1 Symptoms of mulberry snags rotten leaves disease A, Symptoms on young leaves; B, Symptoms on mature leaves; C, Perforation symptoms on lower old leaves.
Fig.2 Colony and conidial morphology of strain HBB1 A, Upper surface of mycelial mat; B, Lower surface of mycelial mat; C, Young mycelia (5 d); D, Senescent mycelia (15 d); E, Conidia.
Fig.5 Symptoms on leaves of some mulberry varieties after inoculation with the mulberry snags rotten leaves disease pathogen A, PDA; B, Fushe 1; C, Nongsang 14; D, Guiyou 12; E, Yun 11; F, Chayesang; G, Yousang; H, Beichang 1; I, Heyebai; J, Chongchang; K, Chuansang 48-3; L, Chuansang 33.
| 品种 Variety | 发病率/% Incidence/% | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of infection sites/mm | 抗性 Resistance | 品种 Variety | 发病率/% Incidence/% | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of infection sites/mm | 抗性 Resis- tance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 川桑33 Chuansang 33 | 88.89±8.39 | 12.80±0.26 | HS | 饲料桑Siliaosang | 82.50±10.9 | 8.28±0.24 | MR |
| 川桑39 Chuansang 39 | 61.37±10.28 | 13.44±0.41 | HS | 双头荷叶白Shuangtouheyebai | 100.00±0 | 7.52±0.50 | MR |
| 川桑7657 Chuansang 7657 | 100.00±0 | 12.40±0.36 | HS | 云桑2号Yunsang 2 | 100.00±0 | 8.50±0.50 | MR |
| 川桑48-3 Chuansang 48-3 | 89.26±8.91 | 18.42±0.38 | HS | 南1号Nan 1 | 90.67±9.29 | 6.58±0.28 | MR |
| 川桑3723 Chuansang 3723 | 88.79±8.25 | 17.83±0.24 | HS | 丰田5号Fengtian 5 | 100.00±0 | 6.24±0.25 | MR |
| 台桑14-1 Taisang 14-1 | 80.61±10.05 | 13.99±0.19 | HS | 新之一濑Xinzhiyilai | 100.00±0 | 6.83±0.28 | MR |
| 川桑826 Chuansang 826 | 81.83±7.90 | 10.11±0.37 | S | 湖桑32 Husang 32 | 100.00±0 | 8.23±0.25 | MR |
| 川桑90-4 Chuansang 90-4 | 53.84±12.71 | 10.02±0.48 | S | 茶叶桑Chayesang | 98.67±2.31 | 5.74±0.25 | R |
| 选一号Xuan 1 | 88.64±8.05 | 11.42±0.38 | S | 821 821 | 88.61±8.01 | 5.33±0.28 | R |
| 充场Chongchang | 100.00±0 | 9.54±0.34 | S | 实钴11-6 Shigu 11-6 | 100.00±0 | 5.25±0.25 | R |
| 云桑1号Yunsang 1 | 100.00±0 | 9.98±0.53 | S | 西农751 Xinong 751 | 100.00±0 | 5.30±0.30 | R |
| 荷叶白Heyebai | 88.61±8.01 | 10.74±0.25 | S | 贵优62 Guiyou 62 | 71.94±12.54 | 5.38±0.34 | R |
| 北场1号Beichang 1 | 100.00±0 | 9.56±0.22 | S | 嘉陵16 Jialing 16 | 100.00±0 | 4.76±0.25 | R |
| 强桑1号Qiangsang 1 | 84.89±6.83 | 9.57±0.21 | S | 云11 Yun 11 | 100.00±0 | 5.39±0.36 | R |
| 西农1号Xinong 1 | 100.00±0 | 7.11±0.36 | MR | 嘉陵20 Jialing 20 | 71.39±10.08 | 5.04±0.26 | R |
| 蔬菜桑Shucaisang | 85.56±5.85 | 7.27±0.25 | MR | 蓬1号Peng 1 | 85.89±5.83 | 5.63±0.35 | R |
| 农桑14号Nongsang 14 | 100.00±0 | 6.59±0.37 | MR | 油桑Yousang | 78.99±8.52 | 5.28±0.25 | R |
| 陕桑305 Shansang 305 | 87.94±7.92 | 7.29±0.26 | MR | 青皮湖桑Qingpihusang | 78.06±7.56 | 3.58±0.19 | R |
| 秋茗Qiuming | 100.00±0 | 8.81±0.27 | MR | 湖桑7号Husang 7 | 79.17±8.78 | 4.76±0.25 | R |
| 渝桑101 Yusang 101 | 100.00±0 | 7.28±0.25 | MR | 桐桑Tongsang | 100.00±0 | 5.80±0.26 | R |
| 农桑8号Nongsang 8 | 100.00±0 | 6.24±0.25 | MR | 贵优12 Guiyou 12 | 69.72±9.59 | 4.53±0.50 | R |
| 蓬2号Peng 2 | 100.00±0 | 6.79±0.21 | MR | 小冠桑Xiaoguansang | 100.00±0 | 3.92±0.19 | R |
| 育711 Yu 711 | 83.89±8.39 | 6.55±0.43 | MR | 辐射1号Fushe 1 | 88.55±7.93 | 2.09±0.52 | HR |
| 川桑98-1 Chuansang 98-1 | 62.22±10.72 | 6.61±0.26 | MR |
Table 3 Disease development and resistance of 47 mulberry varieties at 6 days after inoculation with mulberry snags rotten leaves disease pathogen
| 品种 Variety | 发病率/% Incidence/% | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of infection sites/mm | 抗性 Resistance | 品种 Variety | 发病率/% Incidence/% | 病斑直径/mm Diameter of infection sites/mm | 抗性 Resis- tance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 川桑33 Chuansang 33 | 88.89±8.39 | 12.80±0.26 | HS | 饲料桑Siliaosang | 82.50±10.9 | 8.28±0.24 | MR |
| 川桑39 Chuansang 39 | 61.37±10.28 | 13.44±0.41 | HS | 双头荷叶白Shuangtouheyebai | 100.00±0 | 7.52±0.50 | MR |
| 川桑7657 Chuansang 7657 | 100.00±0 | 12.40±0.36 | HS | 云桑2号Yunsang 2 | 100.00±0 | 8.50±0.50 | MR |
| 川桑48-3 Chuansang 48-3 | 89.26±8.91 | 18.42±0.38 | HS | 南1号Nan 1 | 90.67±9.29 | 6.58±0.28 | MR |
| 川桑3723 Chuansang 3723 | 88.79±8.25 | 17.83±0.24 | HS | 丰田5号Fengtian 5 | 100.00±0 | 6.24±0.25 | MR |
| 台桑14-1 Taisang 14-1 | 80.61±10.05 | 13.99±0.19 | HS | 新之一濑Xinzhiyilai | 100.00±0 | 6.83±0.28 | MR |
| 川桑826 Chuansang 826 | 81.83±7.90 | 10.11±0.37 | S | 湖桑32 Husang 32 | 100.00±0 | 8.23±0.25 | MR |
| 川桑90-4 Chuansang 90-4 | 53.84±12.71 | 10.02±0.48 | S | 茶叶桑Chayesang | 98.67±2.31 | 5.74±0.25 | R |
| 选一号Xuan 1 | 88.64±8.05 | 11.42±0.38 | S | 821 821 | 88.61±8.01 | 5.33±0.28 | R |
| 充场Chongchang | 100.00±0 | 9.54±0.34 | S | 实钴11-6 Shigu 11-6 | 100.00±0 | 5.25±0.25 | R |
| 云桑1号Yunsang 1 | 100.00±0 | 9.98±0.53 | S | 西农751 Xinong 751 | 100.00±0 | 5.30±0.30 | R |
| 荷叶白Heyebai | 88.61±8.01 | 10.74±0.25 | S | 贵优62 Guiyou 62 | 71.94±12.54 | 5.38±0.34 | R |
| 北场1号Beichang 1 | 100.00±0 | 9.56±0.22 | S | 嘉陵16 Jialing 16 | 100.00±0 | 4.76±0.25 | R |
| 强桑1号Qiangsang 1 | 84.89±6.83 | 9.57±0.21 | S | 云11 Yun 11 | 100.00±0 | 5.39±0.36 | R |
| 西农1号Xinong 1 | 100.00±0 | 7.11±0.36 | MR | 嘉陵20 Jialing 20 | 71.39±10.08 | 5.04±0.26 | R |
| 蔬菜桑Shucaisang | 85.56±5.85 | 7.27±0.25 | MR | 蓬1号Peng 1 | 85.89±5.83 | 5.63±0.35 | R |
| 农桑14号Nongsang 14 | 100.00±0 | 6.59±0.37 | MR | 油桑Yousang | 78.99±8.52 | 5.28±0.25 | R |
| 陕桑305 Shansang 305 | 87.94±7.92 | 7.29±0.26 | MR | 青皮湖桑Qingpihusang | 78.06±7.56 | 3.58±0.19 | R |
| 秋茗Qiuming | 100.00±0 | 8.81±0.27 | MR | 湖桑7号Husang 7 | 79.17±8.78 | 4.76±0.25 | R |
| 渝桑101 Yusang 101 | 100.00±0 | 7.28±0.25 | MR | 桐桑Tongsang | 100.00±0 | 5.80±0.26 | R |
| 农桑8号Nongsang 8 | 100.00±0 | 6.24±0.25 | MR | 贵优12 Guiyou 12 | 69.72±9.59 | 4.53±0.50 | R |
| 蓬2号Peng 2 | 100.00±0 | 6.79±0.21 | MR | 小冠桑Xiaoguansang | 100.00±0 | 3.92±0.19 | R |
| 育711 Yu 711 | 83.89±8.39 | 6.55±0.43 | MR | 辐射1号Fushe 1 | 88.55±7.93 | 2.09±0.52 | HR |
| 川桑98-1 Chuansang 98-1 | 62.22±10.72 | 6.61±0.26 | MR |
| [1] | 商务部市场运行和消费促进司. 2020年中国茧丝绸行业发展报告[EB/OL]. (2021-07-29)[2024-11-21]. https://jscscyxs.mofcom.gov.cn/jscFile/jsc/_news/2021/7/1627538079755.html. |
| [2] | 刘率男, 刘泉, 刘玉玲, 等. 桑枝总生物碱片研发历程回顾(二): 现代药理学理念诠释中药的药效特点及药理作用机制[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2020, 28(8): 635-640. I) |
| LIU S N, LIU Q, LIU Y L, et al. Review of the research and development of Ramulus Mori (Sangzhi) alkaloids (II): modern pharmacological concepts interpret the characteristics of pharmacological effects and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicines[J]. Chinese Journal of Diabetes, 2020, 28(8): 635-640. | |
| [3] | 王春莉, 陈忠琴, 徐蕾蕾, 等. 绿色合成桑叶银纳米粒及其抗菌抗癌活性[J]. 精细化工, 2021, 38(1): 130-137. |
| WANG C L, CHEN Z Q, XU L L, et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with aqueous Folium Mori extracts and their antimicrobial and anticancer activities[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2021, 38(1): 130-137. | |
| [4] | 张猛. 三峡库区消落带桑树内生和根际真菌群落结构及其提升桑树抗逆性能的研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020. |
| ZHANG M. Research on the community structure of mulberry endophytic and rhizosphere fungi and their improvement of stress resistance in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the three gorges reservoir area[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2020. | |
| [5] | 张芳, 王晓红, 罗泽虎, 等. 桑树幼苗对重金属镉的分布与富集规律[J]. 农技服务, 2020, 37(10): 17-19. |
| ZHANG F, WANG X H, LUO Z H, et al. Distribution and accumulation of cadmium in mulberry seedlings[J]. Agricultural Technology Service, 2020, 37(10): 17-19. | |
| [6] | 涂亚婷. 桑断枝烂叶病菌(Boeremia exigua GXH1)生物学特性及致病机理探究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2022. |
| TU Y T. Biological characteristics and pathogenesis of Boeremia exigua GXH1[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2022. | |
| [7] | 浦冠勤, 黄艳君, 毛建萍, 等. 中国桑树病害名录(Ⅰ)[J]. 中国蚕业, 2012, 33(2): 21-24. |
| PU G Q, HUANG Y J, MAO J P, et al. List of mulberry diseases in China (Ⅰ)[J]. China Sericulture, 2012, 33(2): 21-24. | |
| [8] | 陈小青, 朱方容, 宾荣佩, 等. 桑断枝烂叶病病原菌对桑树不同部位的致病性测定[J]. 广西蚕业, 2016, 53(2): 12-15. |
| CHEN X Q, ZHU F R, BIN R P, et al. Pathogenicity assay of the pathogen causing mulberry branch break and leaf rot disease on different parts of the mulberry tree[J]. Guangxi Sericulture, 2016, 53(2): 12-15. | |
| [9] | 韦海玲. 桑断枝烂叶病的病原菌种类鉴定[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2015. |
| WEI H L. Identification of pathogen species of mulberry snags rotten leaves disease[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2015. | |
| [10] | MACHOWICZ-STEFANIAK Z, ZIMOWSKA B, ZALEWSKA E. The occurrence and pathogenicity of Phoma exigua Desm. var. Exigua for selected species of herbs[J]. Acta Agrobotanica, 2012, 61(2): 157-166. |
| [11] | AVESKAMP M M, WOUDENBERG J H C, DE GRUYTER J, et al. Development of taxon-specific sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers based on actin sequences and DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF): a case study in the Phoma exigua species complex[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2009, 10(3): 403-414. |
| [12] | TIWARI R, SINGH S, SINGH N, et al. Unwrapping the hydrolytic system of the phytopathogenic fungus Phoma exigua by secretome analysis[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2014, 49(10): 1630-1636. |
| [13] | MASI M, ZONNO M C, BOARI A, et al. Terpestacin, a toxin produced by Phoma exigua var. Heteromorpha, the causal agent of a severe foliar disease of oleander (Nerium oleander L.)[J]. Natural Product Research, 2022, 36(5): 1253-1259. |
| [14] | 王若琳, 徐伟芳, 王飞, 等. 桑树内生拮抗菌的分离鉴定及其对桑断枝烂叶病的生防初探[J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(11): 2130-2143. |
| WANG R L, XU W F, WANG F, et al. Isolation and identification of an antagonistic endophytic bacterium from mulberry for biocontrol against Boeremia exigua[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2019, 59(11): 2130-2143. | |
| [15] | 王若琳. 桑树内生拮抗菌的分离鉴定及其对桑断枝烂叶病生防机制的初探[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021. |
| WANG R L. Isolation and identification of an antagonistic endophyte from mulberry and preliminary exploration its biocontrol mechanism against Boeremia exigua[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2021. | |
| [16] | LAN Y R, DUAN T Y. Characterization of Boeremia exigua causing stem necrotic lesions on Luobuma in northwest China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12: 21609. |
| [17] | KOIKE S T, SUBBARAO K V, VERKLEY G J M, et al. Phoma basal rot of romaine lettuce in California caused by Phoma exigua: occurrence, characterization, and control[J]. Plant Disease, 2006, 90(10): 1268-1275. |
| [18] | 孙雅楠, 哀嘉彬, 唐爱妙, 等. 浙江桑葚菌核病的病原菌鉴定及其对4种杀菌剂的抗性检测[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(12): 1934-1940. |
| SUN Y N, AI J B, TANG A M, et al. Identification of pathogenic fungi causing mulberry fruit sclerotiniose and their resistance to four fungicides in Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(12): 1934-1940. | |
| [19] | 危玲, 刘刚, 熊丽平, 等. 4个果桑品种对桑椹小粒型菌核病的田间抗性鉴定[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(1): 267-268. |
| WEI L, LIU G, XIONG L P, et al. Field resistance identification of four mulberry varieties to mulberry sorosis disease[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(1): 267-268. | |
| [20] | 朱方容, 朱光书, 林强, 等. 76个桑树杂交组合对青枯病的抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 蚕业科学, 2014, 40(5): 781-789. |
| ZHU F R, ZHU G S, LIN Q, et al. Identification and evaluation on disease resistance of 76 mulberry hybridized combinations to bacterial wilt disease[J]. Acta Sericologica Sinica, 2014, 40(5): 781-789. | |
| [21] | 邵蝴蝶, 刘婉蓉, 唐翠明, 等. 桑树根结线虫病抗性品种鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 仲恺农业工程学院学报, 2019, 32(1): 9-12. |
| SHAO H D, LIU W R, TANG C M, et al. Evaluation of mulberry varieties resistance to root-knot nematode disease and screening of control agents[J]. Journal of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 9-12. | |
| [22] | 左媛媛. 桑树炭疽病抗性评价及抗病相关基因挖掘[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2023. |
| ZUO Y Y. Evaluation of mulberry anthracnose resistance and mining of resistance related genes[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2023. | |
| [23] | KATOH K, STANDLEY D M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2013, 30(4): 772-780. |
| [24] | CAPELLA-GUTIÉRREZ S, SILLA-MARTÍNEZ J M, GABALDÓN T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses[J]. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(15): 1972-1973. |
| [25] | ZHANG D, GAO F L, JAKOVLIć I, et al. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2020, 20(1): 248-255. |
| [26] | NGUYEN L T, SCHMIDT H A, VON HAESELER A, et al. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2015, 32(1): 268-274. |
| [1] | LIU Pengfei, ZHANG Shuhan, HONG Kai, SHAO Yue, LOU Binggan. Isolation and identification of the pathogen causing tomato canker in Zhejiang Province of China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1293-1300. |
| [2] | WANG Chao, LI Yanjie, NIU Yun, WEN Lianhao, CHEN Jingjing, WU Hongzhi, YANG Yuyong, WU Yandi. Biological characterization of black spot pathogens in Rosa chinensis and evaluation of varietal resistance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1087-1096. |
| [3] | JI Mengting, CHEN Changjiang, ZHU Ling, ZHAN Menglin, XIAO Shun, CAI Xueqing. Identification of etiological bacterium causing leaf spot disease on Ficus carica [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1097-1106. |
| [4] | REN Xiaorong, WANG Xinquan, ZHANG Shanying, WANG Meng, ZHU Hongming, ZHANG Chenghui, QI Peipei. Simultaneous determination of five bioactive substances in mulberry leaves by LC-MS/MS [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(10): 2179-2189. |
| [5] | HAN Qingyu, CHENG Linrun, LI Yuehong, QIU Zhiling, HOU Meng, LOU Binggan. Evaluation of resistance to foot rot and analysis of disease resistance related indexes of 60 sweet potato germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1616-1625. |
| [6] | LI Yani, CHEN Weiliang, MAO Bizeng. Pathogen identification of root rot of Curcuma wenyujin [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1086-1093. |
| [7] | LUO Zhihan, LIU Pengfei, YU Jun, QI He, CHEN Xiaoguang, LOU Binggan. Identification and biological characteristics of pathogen causing branch dieback on Styphnolobium japonicum (L.) Schott [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 579-588. |
| [8] | CHEN Henghui, WANG Junfeng, HAN Yanchao, CHEN Huizhi, WU Weijie, DING Yuting, TONG Chuan, GAO Haiyan. Effects of drying methods on quality of solid drinks made from mulberry leaves and barbary wolfberry fruits and its taste optimization [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 205-214. |
| [9] | ZHU Yan, WEI Jia, XU Zilong, LIN Tianbao, YANG Sheng, LIU Yan, LYU Zhiqiang, LIU Peigang. Effects of growth promoting hormones on physiological and biochemical indexes of mulberry leaves during senescence [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1278-1285. |
| [10] | YANG Ling, SHA Nanjing, PAN Pengju, WU Bozhi. Identification and main biological characteristics of pathogen of Clematis leaf blight in Yunnan [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1449-1456. |
| [11] | LU Jingwei, CHEN Guokang, ZHOU Na, WEI Jie, HU Yan, ZHENG Yang, TAO Weilin. Resistance evaluation of six towel gourd varieties to Meloidogyne incognita [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 959-965. |
| [12] | YANG Jifen, YANG Wen, DU Wei, LIAO Pengfei, LIU Yonghui, BAI Hongying, DING Zhiwei, DONG Zhanpeng. Effect of spraying water to mulberry in autumn on breeding of Bombyx mori original species by juvenile hormone pesticide pollution [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(4): 720-726. |
| [13] | LIU Na, FAN Qiaochu, ZHOU Jia, SONG Yajing, ZHANG Guwen, FENG Zhijuan, BO Yuanpeng, WANG Bin, GONG Yaming. Identification and control of anthracnose in vegetable soybean [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(12): 2682-2688. |
| [14] | REN Qianqian, SUN Jixia, ZHANG Deshun, DING Zhaotang, ZHANG Yingjie, ZHANG Jingwei. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different Hydrangea varieties under drought stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860. |
| [15] | FAN Ming, XIANG Lu, XU Wenhui, CAO Yan, LIU Zhe, LU Shengmin. Purification of α-amylase inhibitor from mulberry pomace by macroporous resin and analysis into its active components [J]. , 2019, 31(7): 1154-1160. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||