贮藏期不同类型甘薯块根营养品质与淀粉特性变化

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.12.02

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2224-2233.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.12.02

贮藏期不同类型甘薯块根营养品质与淀粉特性变化

赵琳¹(), 叶夏芳², 董韦², 石江¹, 骆乐谈¹^,^*(), 陆国权²^,^*()

1.杭州市农业科学研究院农作物(生态)研究所,浙江杭州 310024
2.浙江农林大学农业与食品科学学院,浙江杭州 311300

收稿日期:2021-01-22 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2022-01-10
作者简介:骆乐谈,E-mail: 576267481@qq.com
* 陆国权,E-mail: lugq10@zju.edu.cn;
赵琳(1987—),女,河北邢台人,硕士,农艺师,主要从事旱粮育种与栽培相关工作。E-mail: zhaolin0227@163.com
通讯作者: 骆乐谈,陆国权
基金资助:
财政部和农业农村部——国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-10-B21);浙江省重点研发计划(2021C02057);杭州市财政项目(2021HNCT-05);杭州市科技发展计划(20191203B57)

Changes of nutritional quality and starch properties of different types of sweet potato roots during storage

ZHAO Lin¹(), YE Xiafang², DONG Wei², SHI Jiang¹, LUO Letan¹^,^*(), LUO Guoquan²^,^*()

1. Crop (Ecology) Research Institute, Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China
2. College of Agriculture and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China

Received:2021-01-22 Online:2021-12-25 Published:2022-01-10
Contact: LUO Letan,LUO Guoquan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

贮藏过程中甘薯的品质会发生变化,为深入研究不同贮藏时期甘薯品质和淀粉特性的变化规律,分析淀粉型甘薯ZH1042、鲜食型甘薯ZZ1-358和对照品种心香在贮藏期间的营养品质与淀粉特性变化。结果表明:随着贮藏时间的延长,不同类型甘薯的品质和淀粉特性变化规律不同。淀粉型甘薯在贮藏过程中失水率和腐烂率最高,心香在整个贮藏期的腐烂率最低。3个甘薯品种(系)的总淀粉酶活性和β-淀粉酶活性随着贮藏时间的延长呈现先上升后下降再上升的趋势且差异显著。ZH1042淀粉含量呈现先下降后上升的趋势,可溶性糖含量和蛋白质含量总体呈现先上升后下降趋势,整个贮藏期可溶性糖含量变化不显著,而蛋白质含量在贮藏100 d后显著下降。ZZ1-358淀粉含量呈现先下降后上升趋势,可溶性糖含量呈下降趋势,而蛋白质含量却先上升后下降又上升。心香的淀粉含量在贮藏100 d后显著上升,可溶性糖含量随着贮藏时间的延长而降低,蛋白质含量则随着贮藏时间的延长呈现先升高后降低再升高的趋势,差异显著,由此可见,甘薯中淀粉含量的高低直接影响甘薯的可溶性糖和蛋白质含量。贮藏70~100 d,不同类型甘薯材料提取的淀粉纯度最高,最高黏度、最终黏度、回复值和热浆黏度在甘薯贮藏100 d时显著下降,甘薯中淀粉含量的高低能够直接影响可溶性糖和蛋白质含量,贮藏会改变甘薯淀粉X射线的衍射强度但不改变其晶体结构,贮藏时间不宜超过130 d。

关键词: 甘薯, 贮藏, 失水率, 蛋白质, 淀粉, 可溶性糖

Abstract:

The quality of sweet potato changes during storage. In order to study of the changes of sweet potato quality and starch characteristics during different storage periods, changes in nutritional quality and starch properties of starchy sweet potato ZH1042, fresh food sweet potato ZZ1-358 and control variety Xinxiang during storage were analyzed. The results showed that: changes in quality and starch characteristics of different types of sweet potato varieties were different with time extension. The starchy sweet potato had the highest water loss rate and decay rate during storage, while Xinxiang had the lowest decay rate during the entire storage period. The total amylase activity and β-amylase activity of the three sweet potato varieties (lines) showed a trend of first rising, then falling and then rising with the extension of storage time, and differences were significant. The starch content of ZH1042 decreased first and then increased. Soluble sugar content and protein content generally increased first and then decreased. Content of soluble sugar did not change significantly before and after the storage period, while protein content decreased significantly after 100 days of storage. Starch content of ZZ1-358 first decreased and then increased, soluble sugar content decreased, while the protein content first increased, then decreased and then increased. Starch content of Xinxiang increased significantly after storage for 100 days, soluble sugar content decreased with extension of storage time, and protein content showed a trend of first increase, then decrease and then increase with extension of storage time, the difference was significant. This showed that level of starch content in sweet potato directly affected content of soluble sugar and protein in sweet potato. During the storage period of 70-100 d, the starch extracted from different types of sweet potato materials had the highest purity. The highest viscosity value, final viscosity value, recovery value and hot pulp viscosity value would decrease significantly when the sweet potato was stored for 100 d. The starch content in the sweet potato could directly affecting soluble sugar and protein content, storage would change X-ray diffraction intensity of sweet potato starch but not its crystal structure. The storage time of most varieties could not exceed 130 d.

Key words: sweet potato, storage, water loss rate, protein, starch, soluble sugar

中图分类号:

S531

赵琳, 叶夏芳, 董韦, 石江, 骆乐谈, 陆国权. 贮藏期不同类型甘薯块根营养品质与淀粉特性变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2224-2233.

ZHAO Lin, YE Xiafang, DONG Wei, SHI Jiang, LUO Letan, LUO Guoquan. Changes of nutritional quality and starch properties of different types of sweet potato roots during storage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2224-2233.

图/表 10

参考文献 22

[1]	史春余, 姚海兰, 张立明, 等. 不同类型甘薯品种块根淀粉粒粒度的分布特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(21): 4537-4543.
	SHI C Y, YAO H L, ZHANG L M, et al. Starch granule size distribution in storage roots of different types of sweet potato cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(21): 4537-4543.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	刘桂玲, 张鹏, 郑建利, 等. 不同类型甘薯品种主要经济性状和营养成分差异[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2012, 27(2): 10-13.
	LIU G L, ZHANG P, ZHENG J L, et al. Variation in major economic traits and nutrition composition among different types of sweet potato cultivars[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2012, 27(2): 10-13.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王佳佳. 甘薯淀粉含量与代谢关键酶基因表达差异性研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2018.
	WANG J J. Studies on the difference about starch content and gene relative expression of the key enzymes in Ipomoea batatas L[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2018.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	刘倩, 侯松, 刘庆, 等. 移栽时期对食用型甘薯品种烟薯25号产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017(5): 136-141.
	LIU Q, HOU S, LIU Q, et al. Effects of transplanting date on yield and quality of edible sweet potato cv. Yanshu No.25[J]. Crops, 2017(5): 136-141.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	唐忠厚, 魏猛, 陈晓光, 等. 不同肉色甘薯块根主要营养品质特征与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(9): 1705-1714.
	TANG Z H, WEI M, CHEN X G, et al. Characters and comprehensive evaluation of nutrient quality of sweet potato storage root with different flesh colors[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(9): 1705-1714.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	于振文. 作物栽培学各论: 北方本[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[7]	李长志, 李欢, 刘庆, 等. 不同生长时期干旱胁迫甘薯根系生长及荧光生理的特性比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(2): 511-517.
	LI C Z, LI H, LIU Q, et al. Comparison of root development and fluorescent physiological characteristics of sweet potato exposure to drought stress in different growth stages[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(2): 511-517.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	王钊, 刘明慧, 樊晓中, 等. 甘薯收获与安全贮藏[J]. 中国农村小康科技, 2008(2): 21-23.
	WANG Z, LIU M H, FAN X Z, et al. Sweet potato harvesting and safe storage[J]. Chinese Countryside Well-Off Technology, 2008(2): 21-23.(in Chinese)
[9]	连喜军, 李洁, 王吰, 等. 不同品种甘薯常温贮藏期间呼吸强度变化规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 310-313.
	LIAN X J, LI J, WANG H, et al. Regularity for change of respiration intensity of different sweet potato varieties at normal atmospheric temperature[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(6): 310-313. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	柳洪鹃, 史春余, 张海峰, 等. 甘薯贮藏过程中营养品质变化及生理机制研究进展[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 43(1): 159-162.
	LIU H J, SHI C Y, ZHANG H F, et al. Research progress on nutritional changes and physiological mechanism of sweet potato during storage[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 43(1): 159-162.(in Chinese)
[11]	吕尊富, 潘超, 崔鹏, 等. 短期储藏对不同大小甘薯理化特性的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2019, 34(6): 30-36.
	LÜ Z F, PAN C, CUI P, et al. Effects of short-term storage on physical and chemical characteristics of sweet potato in different sizes[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2019, 34(6): 30-36.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	陆国权. 甘薯重要品质性状的基因型差异及其环境效应研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2002.
	LU G Q. Genotype variation and environmental effects on some important quality traits of sweetpotatoes (Ipomoea batata (L)lam.)[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	马琴国, 王引权, 赵勇. 蒽酮-硫酸比色法测定党参中可溶性糖含量的研究[J]. 甘肃中医学院学报, 2009, 26(6): 46-48.
	MA Q G, WANG Y Q, ZHAO Y. Determination of soluble sugar in Codonopsis pilosula by anthrone sulfuric acid colorimetry[J]. Journal of Gansu College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2009, 26(6): 46-48.(in Chinese)
[14]	樊吴静, 罗兴录, 翟瑞宁, 等. 不同淀粉型木薯品种采后块根变质生理特性的比较[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(3): 39-44.
	FAN W J, LUO X L, ZHAI R N, et al. Comparison on the physiological characteristics of tuberous roots of cassava varieties with different starch content during post-harvest deterioration[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(3): 39-44.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	杨景峰, 罗志刚, 罗发兴. 淀粉晶体结构研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2007, 28(7): 240-243.
	YANG J F, LUO Z G, LUO F X. Research progress of starch crystal structure[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2007, 28(7): 240-243.(in Chinese)
[16]	文明富, 胡梅珍, 陈新, 等. 八个木薯品种(系)储藏根采后耐贮性生化指标的变化[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1): 172-176.
	WEN M F, HU M Z, CHEN X, et al. Biochemical indicators for storability of eight cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz) tuberous roots in postharvest storage process[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(1): 172-176.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[17]	简纯平. 采后木薯块根贮存能力及蛋白质组学分析[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2013.
	JIAN C P. Storage ability and proteomic analysis of post-harvest tuberous roots of cassava[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	林汝湘. 甘薯收获后短期存放营养的变化[J]. 食品科学, 1990, 11(11): 44-46.
	LIN R X. Nutritional changes of sweet potato during short-term storage after harvest[J]. Food Science, 1990, 11(11): 44-46.(in Chinese)
[19]	BALLS A K, WALDEN M K, THOMPSON R R. A crystalline β-amylase from sweet potatoes[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1948, 173(1): 9-19. PMID
[20]	LI H S, ÔBA K. Major soluble proteins of sweet potato roots and changes in proteins after cutting, infection, or storage[J]. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1985, 49(3): 737-744.
[21]	YOSHIDA N, NAKAMURA K. Molecular cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of cDNA encoding the subunit of sweet potato beta-amylase[J]. Journal of Biochemistry, 1991, 110(2): 196-201. DOI URL
[22]	王炜, 李鹏霞, 李建军, 等. 两种甘薯在中后期贮藏期间的品质变化研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(3): 136-139.
	WANG W, LI P X, LI J J, et al. Quality changes of two breeds of sweet potato at mid and late preservation stage[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2011, 23(3): 136-139.(in Chinese with English abstract)

品种 Varieties	贮藏期 Storage period/d	最高黏度 Maximum viscosity/cp	热浆黏度 Hot viscosity/cp	崩解值 Disintegration value/cp	最终黏度 Final viscosity/cp	回复值 Reply value/cp	峰值时间 Peak time/min	糊化温度 Gelatinization temperature/℃
ZH1042	40	4178.67± 69.87 h	1729.33± 31.57 g	2449.33± 59.37 j	2584.00± 23.43 h	854.67± 16.26 g	4.53± 0.12 d	81.27± 0.85 bc
	70	5826.00± 66.00 a	2601.00± 109.00 a	3223.00± 48.00 cde	3777.67± 89.50 a	1174.67± 17.50 b	4.53± 0.01 d	79.20± 0.05 fgh
	100	4907.67± 86.50 de	1799.00± 29.00 f	3108.67± 116.50 f	2730.00± 51.00 g	931.00± 14.00 f	4.60± 0.01 c	78.80± 0.10 ghi
	130	5220.00± 1.00 c	1889.00± 16.00 e	3331.00± 17.00 b	3056.67± 22.50 d	1167.67± 6.51 b	4.53± 0.01 d	77.75± 0.01 j
	160	5388.00± 15.00 b	1890.00± 7.00 e	3498.00± 22.00 a	3058.00± 3.00 d	1168.00± 10.00 b	4.53± 0.01 d	78.45± 0.01 ij
ZZ1-358	40	5371.00± 5.00 b	2403.00± 21.00 b	2968.00± 26.00 g	3449.00± 46.00 b	1046.00± 67.00 d	4.77± 0.03 b	83.02± 0.78 a
	70	4688.00± 83.00 g	1987.67± 23.50 d	2616.00± 144.00 i	2975.67± 21.50 de	978.00± 8.00 e	4.83± 0.03 a	81.45± 0.05 b
	100	3734.67± 42.50 i	1407.67± 9.50 i	2327.00± 80.00 k	2077.67± 11.50 i	670.00± 12.00 h	4.87± 0.01 a	81.45± 0.01 b
	130	5363.00± 7.00 b	2096.67± 3.51 c	3266.67± 3.51 bcd	3065.67± 17.50 d	969.00± 14.00 ef	4.87± 0.01 a	80.30± 0.40 de
	160	4628.67± 3.51 g	1833.00± 1.00 ef	2795.67± 4.51 h	2825.67± 4.51 fg	992.67± 5.51 e	4.84± 0.04 a	80.70± 0.05 cd
心香 Xinxiang	40	5247.00± 76.62 c	2100.67± 34.53 c	3146.33± 45.52 ef	3251.33± 41.50 c	1150.67± 17.56 b	4.62± 0.04 c	81.48± 0.75 b
	70	4805.67± 96.50 f	1618.00± 61.00 h	3187.67± 34.50 def	2725.67± 285.50 g	1107.67± 25.50 c	4.52± 0.02 d	80.00± 0.75 de
	100	3168.00± 34.00 j	833.67± 42.50 j	2334.67± 75.50 k	1344.00± 86.00 j	510.67± 43.50 i	4.43± 0.03 e	78.53± 0.03 hi
	130	4877.00± 6.00 ef	1666.00± 10.00 gf	3211.00± 16.00 def	2815.67± 10.50 fg	1149.67± 0.58 b	4.60± 0.01 c	79.60± 0.35 ef
	160	4974.67± 30.50 d	1654.00± 3.00 h	3320.67± 27.50 bc	2873.67± 6.51 ef	1219.67± 3.51 a	4.57± 0.04 cd	79.28± 0.03 fg

品种 Varieties	贮藏期 Storage period/d	最高黏度 Maximum viscosity/cp	热浆黏度 Hot viscosity/cp	崩解值 Disintegration value/cp	最终黏度 Final viscosity/cp	回复值 Reply value/cp	峰值时间 Peak time/min	糊化温度 Gelatinization temperature/℃
ZH1042	40	4178.67± 69.87 h	1729.33± 31.57 g	2449.33± 59.37 j	2584.00± 23.43 h	854.67± 16.26 g	4.53± 0.12 d	81.27± 0.85 bc
	70	5826.00± 66.00 a	2601.00± 109.00 a	3223.00± 48.00 cde	3777.67± 89.50 a	1174.67± 17.50 b	4.53± 0.01 d	79.20± 0.05 fgh
	100	4907.67± 86.50 de	1799.00± 29.00 f	3108.67± 116.50 f	2730.00± 51.00 g	931.00± 14.00 f	4.60± 0.01 c	78.80± 0.10 ghi
	130	5220.00± 1.00 c	1889.00± 16.00 e	3331.00± 17.00 b	3056.67± 22.50 d	1167.67± 6.51 b	4.53± 0.01 d	77.75± 0.01 j
	160	5388.00± 15.00 b	1890.00± 7.00 e	3498.00± 22.00 a	3058.00± 3.00 d	1168.00± 10.00 b	4.53± 0.01 d	78.45± 0.01 ij
ZZ1-358	40	5371.00± 5.00 b	2403.00± 21.00 b	2968.00± 26.00 g	3449.00± 46.00 b	1046.00± 67.00 d	4.77± 0.03 b	83.02± 0.78 a
	70	4688.00± 83.00 g	1987.67± 23.50 d	2616.00± 144.00 i	2975.67± 21.50 de	978.00± 8.00 e	4.83± 0.03 a	81.45± 0.05 b
	100	3734.67± 42.50 i	1407.67± 9.50 i	2327.00± 80.00 k	2077.67± 11.50 i	670.00± 12.00 h	4.87± 0.01 a	81.45± 0.01 b
	130	5363.00± 7.00 b	2096.67± 3.51 c	3266.67± 3.51 bcd	3065.67± 17.50 d	969.00± 14.00 ef	4.87± 0.01 a	80.30± 0.40 de
	160	4628.67± 3.51 g	1833.00± 1.00 ef	2795.67± 4.51 h	2825.67± 4.51 fg	992.67± 5.51 e	4.84± 0.04 a	80.70± 0.05 cd
心香 Xinxiang	40	5247.00± 76.62 c	2100.67± 34.53 c	3146.33± 45.52 ef	3251.33± 41.50 c	1150.67± 17.56 b	4.62± 0.04 c	81.48± 0.75 b
	70	4805.67± 96.50 f	1618.00± 61.00 h	3187.67± 34.50 def	2725.67± 285.50 g	1107.67± 25.50 c	4.52± 0.02 d	80.00± 0.75 de
	100	3168.00± 34.00 j	833.67± 42.50 j	2334.67± 75.50 k	1344.00± 86.00 j	510.67± 43.50 i	4.43± 0.03 e	78.53± 0.03 hi
	130	4877.00± 6.00 ef	1666.00± 10.00 gf	3211.00± 16.00 def	2815.67± 10.50 fg	1149.67± 0.58 b	4.60± 0.01 c	79.60± 0.35 ef
	160	4974.67± 30.50 d	1654.00± 3.00 h	3320.67± 27.50 bc	2873.67± 6.51 ef	1219.67± 3.51 a	4.57± 0.04 cd	79.28± 0.03 fg

贮藏期不同类型甘薯块根营养品质与淀粉特性变化

Changes of nutritional quality and starch properties of different types of sweet potato roots during storage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄伟红, 刘一, 郑富明. 表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯对葡萄糖淀粉酶的抑制机制[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1951-1957.
[2]	马荆鄂, 吴斯琪, 万淑敏, 熊信威, 许继国, 许晶, 饶友生, 周敏. 基于串联质量标签(TMT)技术的宁都黄鸡大小睾丸蛋白质组学研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1029-1044.
[3]	王闻琦, 王盼盼, 张严玲, 刘青青, 洪双双, 赵高鹏, 刘泓畅, 王翠玲. 玉米生物钟基因ZmPRR1-2互作蛋白质的筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 977-986.
[4]	刘思彤, 侯宇, 潘家荃, 周桦楠, 崔亮, 万博, 于涛. 甘薯对低温胁迫的生理响应及耐寒性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 767-778.
[5]	袁晓, 蒋园园, 朱云娜, 曲姗姗, 王玉昆, 原远, 王斌. JAZ家族基因在采后黄瓜低温贮藏条件下的表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1820-1831.
[6]	沈升法, 项超, 孟羽莎, 李兵, 吴列洪. 高光效甘薯品种浙薯86的选育、产量与品质特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1469-1480.
[7]	韩清宇, 程林润, 李月红, 仇智灵, 后猛, 楼兵干. 六十份甘薯种质资源对基腐病的抗性评价与抗病相关指标分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1616-1625.
[8]	柴荣耀, 游雨欣, 邱海萍, 郭峻宁, 张震, 李斌, 沈升法, 王艳丽. 甘薯抗茎腐病鉴定技术的建立及种质资源抗性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 569-578.
[9]	叶沁, 孟祥河, 陈黎洪. 添加米糠腌制对酱鸭理化品质与脂肪氧化特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 634-642.
[10]	谭宇虹, 周敏, 张华, 张恒, 王伏林, 宋涛, 朱英, 徐恒. 灌浆期高温对稻米品质影响的品种类型间差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2657-2665.
[11]	刘永安, 黄业昌, 岳高红, 高锡腾, 邓立章, 潘彬荣. 优质小麦品种温麦10号籽粒蛋白质组学分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2437-2446.
[12]	赵凌吉, 廖香娇, 刘德春, 胡威, 匡柳青, 宋杰, 易明亮, 刘勇, 杨莉. 桃溪蜜柚果实贮藏期有机酸含量变化及相关基因表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2510-2520.
[13]	张旭娟, 周历萍, 俞可欣, 柴伟国, 潘念, 傅潇霞, 施建军. 绿芦笋品种间产量及主要营养成分周年变化测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2238-2246.
[14]	宗自豪, 何丁生, 牛犇, 黄俊, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 不同镂空包装对雨天采收杨梅贮运品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 196-204.
[15]	宋传生, 康晓飞, 樊庆忠, 王俊刚, 石雪, 张子汝, 谭青青, 曾小娇, 刘芳, 李英赛, 侯常跃. 枣疯病植原体胸苷激酶基因的克隆、序列分析与原核表达[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1763-1772.