不同栽培基质对盆栽菊花生长的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231360

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 2521-2534.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231360

不同栽培基质对盆栽菊花生长的影响

岳莉然¹(), 倪星雨¹, 刘铭宇¹, 周蕴薇²^,^*()

1.东北林业大学园林学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040
2.吉林农业大学园艺学院,吉林长春 130118

收稿日期:2023-12-04 出版日期:2024-11-25 发布日期:2024-11-27
作者简介:岳莉然(1978—),女,吉林永吉人,博士,副教授,主要从事园林植物资源与应用研究。E-mail: ms_yueliran@163.com
通讯作者: *周蕴薇,E-mail: dlzhyw@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划子课题(2019YFD1001500)

Effects of different culture substrates on the growth of potted chrysanthemum

YUE Liran¹(), NI Xingyu¹, LIU Mingyu¹, ZHOU Yunwei²^,^*()

1. College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2. College of Horticulture, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China

Received:2023-12-04 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究不同栽培基质的理化性质及它们对盆栽菊花生长的影响,本试验以辉煌(Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Huihuang’)、波尔多红(C. morifolium ‘Boerduohong’)、黄芙蓉(C. morifolium ‘Huangfurong’)3个菊花品种为研究材料,共设置12种不同配比基质配方,即比较20种常见基质材料的理化性质后,筛选出河沙、珍珠岩、蛭石、泥炭、椰糠、腐叶和稻壳这7种容易获得、理化性质有所差异的栽培基质,再按照不同体积比混合配制成12组处理,通过分析各栽培基质的理化性质和它们对盆栽菊花生根率、成活率和根系形态的影响,拟筛选出适宜培育盆栽菊花的基质配方。结果表明:(1)与河沙、珍珠岩、蛭石等无机基质相比,腐叶、椰糠、稻壳、泥炭等有机基质具有容重低、孔隙度高、土壤电导率(EC值)高和氮磷钾养分含量高等特点;(2)3个菊花品种在河沙、珍珠岩、蛭石、泥炭(Z1~Z4处理)中生根率和成活率高,均为100%,但在椰糠(Z5处理)中生根率和成活率显著低于其他处理组,并在稻壳∶珍珠岩体积比4∶1的基质(Z12处理)中全部死亡;(3)3个菊花品种在Z1、Z2处理中根系又短又粗、形态弯折,在Z3、Z4处理中根系则又长又细、形态竖直,在泥炭∶珍珠岩体积比4∶1的基质(Z6处理)、泥炭∶珍珠岩∶腐叶∶稻壳体积比6∶2∶1∶1的基质(Z7处理)和泥炭∶珍珠岩∶腐叶∶稻壳体积比2∶1∶1∶1的基质(Z8处理)中根系最健壮,但在Z5处理中根系形态表现最差;(4)采用隶属函数法对各栽培基质下盆栽菊花的生长状况进行综合评价,辉煌、波尔多红和黄芙蓉分别在Z4、Z7、Z6处理中的综合评价指数最高,最适宜盆栽菊花的生长。综上,栽培基质的理化性质对盆栽菊花的生长具有显著的影响,并且常见农林废弃物中的腐叶和稻壳在一定程度上可以代替泥炭作为培育盆栽菊花的优质栽培基质。

关键词: 盆栽菊花, 栽培基质, 植物生长

Abstract:

To explore the physicochemical properties of different culture substrates and their effects on the growth of potted chrysanthemum, three chrysanthemum varieties, namely, Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Huihuang’, C. morifolium ‘Boerduohong’, C. morifolium ‘Huangfurong’ were used as the study materials in this experiment, a total of 12 different matrix formulations with different ratios were set up. In other words, after comparing the physicochemical properties of 20 common substrate materials, 7 kinds of culture substrates with different physicochemical properties were selected, inclduing river sand, perlite, vermiculite, peat, coconut bran, rotting leaves and rice hull, and then 12 groups were mixed according to different volume ratios. By analyzing the physicochemical properties of each culture substrate and its effects on the rooting rate, survival rate and root morphology of potted chrysanthemum, the appropriate matrix formula for cultivating potted chrysanthemum was selected. The results showed that: (1) Compared with the inorganic substrates such as river sand, perlite and vermiculite, the organic substrates such as rotten leaves, coconut bran, rice hull and peat had the characteristics of low bulk density, high porosity, high soil electrical conductivity (EC value) and high nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content. (2) The rooting rate and survival rate of the three chrysanthemum varieties were high in river sand, perlite, vermiculite, and peat (Z1-Z4 treatments), all of which were 100%, but the rooting and survival rates in coconut bran (Z5 treatment) were significantly lower than those in other treatment groups, and all of them died in rice hull: perlite volume ratio of 4∶1 substrate (Z12 treatment). (3) In the Z1 and Z2 treatments, the roots of the three chrysanthemum varieties were short, thick and curved; In the Z3 and Z4 treatments, the roots were long, thin and vertical. In peat∶perlite volume ratio of 4∶1 substrate (Z6 treatment), peat∶perlite∶rotten leaves∶rice hull volume ratio of 6∶2∶1∶1 substrate (Z7 treatment) and peat∶perlite∶rotten leaves∶rice hull volume ratio of 2∶1∶1∶1 substrate (Z8 treatment), the roots were the most robust, but in the Z5 treatment, the roots were the worst. (4) The membership function method was used to comprehensively evaluate the growth status of potted chrysanthemums under each culture substrate. The results showed that Z4, Z7 and Z6 treatments had the highest comprehensive evaluation index in C. morifolium ‘Huihuang’, C. morifolium ‘Boerduohong’, C. morifolium ‘Huangfurong’ respectively, and were the most suitable for the growth of potted chrysanthemums. In conclusion, the physicchemical properties of the culture substrates have a significant impact on the growth of potted chrysanthemum, and the rotten leaves and rice hull in common agricultural and forestry wastes can replace peat as the high-quality culture substrate for cultivating potted chrysanthemum to a certain extent.

Key words: potted chrysanthemum, culture substrate, plant growth

中图分类号:

S682.11

岳莉然, 倪星雨, 刘铭宇, 周蕴薇. 不同栽培基质对盆栽菊花生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2521-2534.

YUE Liran, NI Xingyu, LIU Mingyu, ZHOU Yunwei. Effects of different culture substrates on the growth of potted chrysanthemum[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2521-2534.

图/表 10

参考文献 35

[1]	苏江硕, 贾棣文, 王思悦, 等. 中国菊花遗传育种60年回顾与展望[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(10): 2143-2162.
	SU J S, JIA D W, WANG S Y, et al. Retrospection and prospect of Chrysanthemum genetic breeding for last six decades in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(10): 2143-2162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	李孟儒, 黄洪峰, 顾钊宇, 等. 菊花新品种‘粉舞蝶’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(S2):115-116.
	LI M R, HUANG H F, GU Z Y, et al. A new Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivar ‘Fenwudie’[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S2):115-116. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王可, 邵烨瑶, 张培云, 等. 园林废弃物混菌堆腐方法及其产物对泥炭的替代效果研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1680-1689.
	WANG K, SHAO Y Y, ZHANG P Y, et al. Study on composting method of green waste and its potential in replacing peat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1680-1689. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	郭文斌, 齐文静, 王志鹏, 等. 混配成型条件下农林废弃物资源化利用现状及发展分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(1): 143-150.
	GUO W B, QI W J, WANG Z P, et al. Analysis on the research status and development of agricultural and forestry waste resource utilization under the condition of blending and briquetting[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(1): 143-150. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	刘瑜, 赵佳颖, 周晚来, 等. 城市园林废弃物资源化利用研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(4): 32-38.
	LIU Y, ZHAO J Y, ZHOU W L, et al. Progress on resource utilization of urban garden waste[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 43(4): 32-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	闫永庆, 张艳艳, 刘威, 等. 不同栽培基质对二苞黄精植株生长发育的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2013, 44(10): 93-96.
	YAN Y Q, ZHANG Y Y, LIU W, et al. Effect of different culture substrates on plant growth of Polygonatum involucratum Maxim[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2013, 44(10): 93-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	AMERI A, TEHRANIFAR A, DAVARYNEJAD G, et al. Flowering times and some growth indicators of strawberry were affected by physical properties of the growing media[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 272: 109601.
[8]	余蓉培, 杨春梅, 阮继伟, 等. 不同椰糠配比基质对盆栽袋鼠花生长的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2020, 40(2): 15-20.
	YU R P, YANG C M, RUAN J W, et al. Effects of coir dust as substrate at different proportions on the growth of potted Anigozanthos flavidus[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2020, 40(2): 15-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	THAKUR T, GREWAL H S, KUKAL S S. Impact of growing medium composition on morphological development of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat cv. Snowball)[J]. Current science, 2018, 115(6):1198-1203.
[10]	邸葆, 杨际双, 何雪娜. 不同基质对菊花‘神马’扦插生根的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(4): 69-71.
	DI B, YANG J S, HE X N. Effect of different media on rooting of Chrysanthemum ‘Jinba’ cuttings[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2012(4): 69-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	王旭. 药菊扦插生根影响因子及技术研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2012.
	WANG X. Study on influencing factors and techniques of cutting rooting of Chrysanthemum morifolium[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	卫星, 李贵雨, 吕琳. 农林废弃物育苗基质的保水保肥效应[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(12): 26-34.
	WEI X, LI G Y, LÜ L. Water and nutrient preservation of agri-forest residues used as nursery matrix[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(12): 26-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	卜晓莉, 姬慧娟, 马青林, 等. 生物炭-泥炭复合基质对马缨杜鹃生长和生理的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2021, 30(5): 58-68.
	BU X L, JI H J, MA Q L, et al. Effects of biochar-peat composite substrates on growth and physiology of Rhododendron delavayi[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2021, 30(5): 58-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	季延海, 赵孟良, 武占会, 等. 番茄栽培基质中菊芋发酵秸秆的适宜配比研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(8): 1599-1608.
	JI Y H, ZHAO M L, WU Z H, et al. Research on proper proportions of fermented Helianthus tuberosus straw of tomatoes in substrate culture[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(8): 1599-1608. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	郝丹, 张璐, 孙向阳, 等. 园林废弃物堆肥和牛粪有机肥用于金盏菊育苗的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(4): 150-155.
	HAO D, ZHANG L, SUN X Y, et al. Effects of green waste compost and cow manure organic fertilizer on the emergence rate of Calendula officinalis[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(4): 150-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	马海龙, 刘忠华, 段志平, 等. 蚯蚓粪替代泥炭的栽培基质特性及对绿萝和吊兰花卉生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(5): 112-118.
	MA H L, LIU Z H, DUAN Z P, et al. The effect of vermicompost replacing peat on the physical and chemical properties of the substrate and the growth of two flowers of green radish and Chlorophytum[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(5): 112-118. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[18]	王贞升, 李彦雪, 于成龙, 等. 不同模拟降水量下草地早熟禾根系形态与解剖结构的动态变化[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 70-80.
	WANG Z S, LI Y X, YU C L, et al. Changes in root morphology and anatomical structure of Poa pratensis under different simulated precipitation rates[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(10): 70-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	彭丹丹, 陈大刚, 徐开未, 等. 椰糠复合基质对猕猴桃砧木幼苗生长及根系特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2364-2377.
	PENG D D, CHEN D G, XU K W, et al. Effects of coconut-bran compound substrate on the growth and root characteristics of kiwifruit rootstock seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(10): 2364-2377. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	国家林业局. 花木栽培基质: LY/T 2700—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[21]	郭世荣. 固体栽培基质研究、开发现状及发展趋势[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(S2): 1-4.
	GUO S R. Research progress, current exploitations and developing trends of solid cultivation medium[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(S2): 1-4. (in Chinese)
[22]	刘艳伟, 吴景贵. 有机栽培基质的研究现状与展望[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(10): 172-176.
	LIU Y W, WU J G. Review on researches of organic substrate for culture[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011(10): 172-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	艾娟娟. 不同林业废弃物基质及施肥配方对西南桦和柚木的生长效应[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2018.
	AI J J. Effects of different forest waste substrates and fertilization formulas on the growth of betula alnoides and teak[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	高丽红, 别之龙. 无土栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2017.
[25]	马义胜. 不同农业废弃物复配基质对草莓生长、产量和品质的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018.
	MA Y S. Effects of different agricultural waste compound substrates on growth, yield and quality of strawberry[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	孙敏, 奥岩松. 几种固形物料的物理、化学性状及其栽培基质化评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2004, 19(1): 102-106.
	SUN M, AO Y S. Evaluation as growing medium on physical and chemical characteristics of several solid materiels[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2004, 19(1): 102-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	许杰, 郭新勇, 段兆飞, 等. 不同木薯渣形态和添加比例对番茄产量品质及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1847-1857.
	XU J, GUO X Y, DUAN Z F, et al. Effects of adding form and proportion of cassava residues in soilless cultural substrate on the fruit yield and quality and antioxidant capacity of tomato[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(10): 1847-1857. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	尚秀华, 谢耀坚, 杨小红, 等. 不同配比的腐熟基质对桉树育苗效果影响的研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(12): 2150-2155.
	SHANG X H, XIE Y J, YANG X H, et al. Different mixing proportion media on Eucalyptus seedling[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012, 33(12): 2150-2155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	魏溧姣, 王晓明, 王湘莹, 等. 不同基质对紫叶紫薇容器苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(4): 10-19.
	WEI L J, WANG X M, WANG X Y, et al. Effects of different substrates on the growth and physiology of purple-leaf Lagerstroemia indica container seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(4): 10-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	VANDECASTEELE B, BLINDEMAN L, AMERY F, et al. Grow-Store-Steam-Re-peat: reuse of spent growing media for circular cultivation of chrysanthemum[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020: 276.
[31]	张丹, 钟坤, 蒋振华, 等. 基质和植物生长调节剂对阳光玫瑰葡萄硬枝扦插的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2022, 51(2): 125-128.
	ZHANG D, ZHONG K, JIANG Z H, et al. Effect of medium and plant growth regulators on hardbranch cutting of shine Muscat grape[J]. South China Fruits, 2022, 51(2): 125-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	赵艳红, 侯文焕, 廖小芳, 等. 不同处理方式对玫瑰茄插穗生根效果的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(4): 814-819.
	ZHAO Y H, HOU W H, LIAO X F, et al. Effects of different cuttings treatments on rooting in Roselle[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(4): 814-819. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	施旭丽, 王筠竹, 王萃铂, 等. 4个国庆盆菊品种扦插繁殖[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(1): 141-147.
	SHI X L, WANG Y Z, WANG C B, et al. Cutting propagation with four cultivars of pot chrysanthemums[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2013, 30(1): 141-147. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	王茹华, 贾志民, 逄兴杰, 等. 食用菊花扦插繁殖影响因素的初步研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2009(4): 60-62.
	WANG R H, JIA Z M, PANG X J, et al. Initial studies on factors influencing cutting reproduction of esculent chrysanthemum[J]. China Vegetables, 2009(4): 60-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	杨雪萌. 菊花扦插生根技术和机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2009.
	YANG X M. Study on rooting technology and mechanism of chrysanthemum cutting[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	基质种类 Rooting layer substrate	体积比 Volume ratio
Z1	河沙River sand
Z2	珍珠岩Perlite
Z3	蛭石Vermiculite
Z4	泥炭Peat
Z5	椰糠Coconut bran
Z6	泥炭、珍珠岩Peat, Perlite	4∶1
Z7	泥炭、珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	6∶2∶1∶1
	Peat, perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z8	泥炭、珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	2∶1∶1∶1
	Peat, perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z9	泥炭、珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	2∶2∶3∶3
	Peat, perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z10	珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	1∶2∶2
	Perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z11	腐叶、珍珠岩Rotten leaves, perlite	4∶1
Z12	稻壳、珍珠岩Rice hull, perlite	4∶1

处理 Treatment	基质种类 Rooting layer substrate	体积比 Volume ratio
Z1	河沙River sand
Z2	珍珠岩Perlite
Z3	蛭石Vermiculite
Z4	泥炭Peat
Z5	椰糠Coconut bran
Z6	泥炭、珍珠岩Peat, Perlite	4∶1
Z7	泥炭、珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	6∶2∶1∶1
	Peat, perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z8	泥炭、珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	2∶1∶1∶1
	Peat, perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z9	泥炭、珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	2∶2∶3∶3
	Peat, perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z10	珍珠岩、腐叶、稻壳	1∶2∶2
	Perlite, rotten leaves, rice hull
Z11	腐叶、珍珠岩Rotten leaves, perlite	4∶1
Z12	稻壳、珍珠岩Rice hull, perlite	4∶1

编号 No.	基质材料 Substrate	容重 Bulk density/ (g·cm^-3)	总孔隙度 Total porosity/%	通气孔隙度 Aeration porosity/%	持水孔隙度 Water-holding porosity/%	气水比 Gas-water ratio
1	硅藻土Diatomite	0.64±0.01	54.87±0.56	15.45±0.55	39.41±0.46	0.39±0.02
2	塘泥Pond mud	1.18±0.01	47.68±0.33	9.82±0.85	37.86±0.54	0.26±0.03
3	轻石Pumice	0.43±0.01	41.94±0.55	16.78±0.80	25.17±0.43	0.67±0.04
4	赤玉土Akadama	0.62±0.01	56.47±0.67	21.80±0.39	34.67±0.63	0.63±0.02
5	火山岩Volcanic rock	1.01±0.01	45.10±0.19	34.09±0.30	11.01±0.13	3.10±0.06
6	绿沸石Green zeolite	0.98±0.01	45.89±0.33	3.64±0.12	42.24±0.39	0.08±0.01
7	植金石Zhijin stone	0.56±0.01	54.77±0.39	5.00±0.29	49.76±0.66	0.10±0.01
8	麦饭石Maifan stone	1.41±0.01	36.51±0.57	19.34±0.63	17.18±0.27	1.13±0.05
9	蛭石Vermiculite	0.22±0.01	70.27±0.82	9.79±1.01	60.48±1.81	0.16±0.02
10	珍珠岩Perlite	0.08±0.01	61.77±0.76	33.39±0.65	28.39±0.74	1.18±0.05
11	河沙River sand	1.59±0.01	35.56±0.20	16.77±0.34	18.79±0.40	0.89±0.04
12	泥炭Peat	0.37±0.01	73.40±0.89	19.14±2.96	54.26±3.31	0.36±0.08
13	花生壳Peanut shell	0.14±0.01	73.99±0.80	36.86±0.87	37.14±0.08	0.99±0.03
14	锯末Sawdust	0.19±0.01	81.05±0.32	30.38±0.99	50.68±0.97	0.60±0.03
15	椰糠Coconut bran	0.15±0.01	76.95±0.86	3.53±0.45	73.42±0.88	0.05±0.01
16	牛粪堆肥Cow dung compost	0.68±0.01	59.07±0.17	8.47±0.39	50.60±0.34	0.10±0.01
17	松针Pine needle	0.28±0.01	77.06±0.54	23.19±0.56	53.88±0.41	0.43±0.01
18	腐叶Rotten leaves	0.13±0.01	78.38±0.08	46.02±0.64	32.37±0.57	1.42±0.04
19	稻壳Rice hull	0.15±0.01	74.53±2.61	53.75±3.24	20.78±0.91	2.61±0.25
20	稻壳炭Rice hull charcoal	0.18±0.01	72.57±0.23	0.84±0.08	71.74±0.25	0.01±0.01

编号 No.	基质材料 Substrate	容重 Bulk density/ (g·cm^-3)	总孔隙度 Total porosity/%	通气孔隙度 Aeration porosity/%	持水孔隙度 Water-holding porosity/%	气水比 Gas-water ratio
1	硅藻土Diatomite	0.64±0.01	54.87±0.56	15.45±0.55	39.41±0.46	0.39±0.02
2	塘泥Pond mud	1.18±0.01	47.68±0.33	9.82±0.85	37.86±0.54	0.26±0.03
3	轻石Pumice	0.43±0.01	41.94±0.55	16.78±0.80	25.17±0.43	0.67±0.04
4	赤玉土Akadama	0.62±0.01	56.47±0.67	21.80±0.39	34.67±0.63	0.63±0.02
5	火山岩Volcanic rock	1.01±0.01	45.10±0.19	34.09±0.30	11.01±0.13	3.10±0.06
6	绿沸石Green zeolite	0.98±0.01	45.89±0.33	3.64±0.12	42.24±0.39	0.08±0.01
7	植金石Zhijin stone	0.56±0.01	54.77±0.39	5.00±0.29	49.76±0.66	0.10±0.01
8	麦饭石Maifan stone	1.41±0.01	36.51±0.57	19.34±0.63	17.18±0.27	1.13±0.05
9	蛭石Vermiculite	0.22±0.01	70.27±0.82	9.79±1.01	60.48±1.81	0.16±0.02
10	珍珠岩Perlite	0.08±0.01	61.77±0.76	33.39±0.65	28.39±0.74	1.18±0.05
11	河沙River sand	1.59±0.01	35.56±0.20	16.77±0.34	18.79±0.40	0.89±0.04
12	泥炭Peat	0.37±0.01	73.40±0.89	19.14±2.96	54.26±3.31	0.36±0.08
13	花生壳Peanut shell	0.14±0.01	73.99±0.80	36.86±0.87	37.14±0.08	0.99±0.03
14	锯末Sawdust	0.19±0.01	81.05±0.32	30.38±0.99	50.68±0.97	0.60±0.03
15	椰糠Coconut bran	0.15±0.01	76.95±0.86	3.53±0.45	73.42±0.88	0.05±0.01
16	牛粪堆肥Cow dung compost	0.68±0.01	59.07±0.17	8.47±0.39	50.60±0.34	0.10±0.01
17	松针Pine needle	0.28±0.01	77.06±0.54	23.19±0.56	53.88±0.41	0.43±0.01
18	腐叶Rotten leaves	0.13±0.01	78.38±0.08	46.02±0.64	32.37±0.57	1.42±0.04
19	稻壳Rice hull	0.15±0.01	74.53±2.61	53.75±3.24	20.78±0.91	2.61±0.25
20	稻壳炭Rice hull charcoal	0.18±0.01	72.57±0.23	0.84±0.08	71.74±0.25	0.01±0.01

编号 No.	基质材料 Substrate	pH	EC/(mS· cm^-1)	碱解氮含量 Alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content/(mg·kg^-1)	有效磷含量 Available phosphate content/(mg·kg^-1)	速效钾含量 Availablepotassium content/(mg·kg^-1)
1	硅藻土Diatomite	5.47±0.04	0.11±0.01	14.00±1.76	13.68±0.02	371.39±7.30
2	塘泥Pond mud	8.74±0.05	0.07±0.01	5.37±2.03	5.95±0.04	55.27±0.91
3	轻石Pumice	6.05±0.07	0.06±0.01	14.70±0.40	2.73±0.01	86.37±0.89
4	赤玉土Akadama	7.34±0.08	0.02±0.01	100.33±6.55	5.49±0.13	132.57±1.08
5	火山岩Volcanic rock	8.75±0.01	0.04±0.01	5.37±0.23	2.35±0.02	72.57±1.47
6	绿沸石Green zeolite	6.36±0.07	0.02±0.01	6.53±1.63	3.05±0.12	1 731.31±10.87
7	植金石Zhijin stone	6.37±0.02	0.03±0.01	4.20±0.40	2.12±0.01	107.36±1.27
8	麦饭石Maifan stone	7.35±0.01	0.02±0.01	7.00±2.65	19.33±0.18	14.43±0.07
9	蛭石Vermiculite	6.17±0.03	0.06±0.01	7.70±0.40	0.84±0.05	108.41±1.56
10	珍珠岩Perlite	8.75±0.05	0.03±0.01	11.67±0.62	0.20±0.02	57.86±3.19
11	河沙River sand	6.53±0.05	0.03±0.01	14.00±0.40	12.49±0.38	91.16±0.89
12	泥炭Peat	5.26±0.03	0.13±0.01	471.80±1.46	42.28±0.28	127.38±10.15
13	花生壳Peanut shell	8.62±0.02	0.80±0.03	594.53±1.42	338.22±1.73	14 449.84±30.27
14	锯末Sawdust	6.08±0.01	0.11±0.01	142.80±2.52	60.66±0.02	1 224.20±13.44
15	椰糠Coconut bran	7.14±0.01	2.48±0.01	236.02±23.48	378.76±0.53	15 751.18±29.16
16	牛粪堆肥Cow dung compost	6.41±0.01	1.64±0.03	531.38±13.90	340.96±0.27	9 050.39±32.06
17	松针Pine needle	6.72±0.01	0.15±0.01	540.40±5.73	91.50±0.06	686.79±65.46
18	腐叶Rotten leaves	6.45±0.02	0.30±0.02	504.47±11.99	193.18±0.05	3 394.64±6.19
19	稻壳Rice hull	7.06±0.01	2.85±0.02	544.60±7.10	513.01±0.37	11 506.44±32.98
20	稻壳炭Rice hull charcoal	10.46±0.01	0.87±0.01	39.67±3.44	388.30±0.34	11 483.22±23.11

不同栽培基质对盆栽菊花生长的影响

Effects of different culture substrates on the growth of potted chrysanthemum

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

处理 Treatment	品种Cultivar
处理 Treatment	辉煌 Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Huihuang’	波尔多红 C. morifolium ‘Boerduohong’	黄芙蓉 C. morifolium ‘Huangfurong’
Z1	100.00 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z2	100.00 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z3	100.00 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z4	100.00 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z5	58.33 b	83.33 c	25.00 c
Z6	91.67 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z7	83.33 a	100.00 a	91.67 ab
Z8	91.67 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z9	83.33 a	91.67 a	91.67 ab
Z10	83.33 a	100.00 a	83.33 b
Z11	91.67 a	100.00 a	100.00 a
Z12	0 c	0 b	0 d

品种 Cultivars	处理 Treatment	总根长 Total root length/cm	根总表面积 Total root surface area/cm²	根平均直径 Average root diameter/mm	总根体积 Total root volume/cm³	根尖数 Number of root tip	根分叉数 Number of root fork
辉煌 Chrysanthemum	Z1	41.30± 4.02 cd	8.01± 0.62 bc	0.64± 0.05 bc	0.13± 0.01 b	109.80± 15.24 de	245.00± 28.50 cde
morifolium‘Huihuang’	Z2	21.78± 2.85 de	4.14± 0.69 cd	0.88± 0.05 a	0.09± 0.02 bc	58.33± 9.35 e	69.67± 15.45 ef
	Z3	36.14± 7.62 cde	5.22± 0.99 cd	0.49± 0.02 cd	0.06± 0.01 c	231.08± 44.91 bcd	133.33± 24.28 def
	Z4	95.11± 10.77 a	12.88± 1.44 ab	0.43± 0.02 d	0.14± 0.02 ab	624.91± 84.50 a	664.00± 90.19 a
	Z5	12.20± 4.20 e	3.22± 0.68 d	0.76± 0.07 ab	0.06± 0.01 c	47.67± 9.42 e	58.17± 15.41 f
	Z6	83.12± 11.35 ab	11.65± 1.63 ab	0.45± 0.02 d	0.13± 0.02 ab	303.83± 47.96 b	552.67± 98.28 ab
	Z7	57.07± 7.52 bc	10.95± 1.43 ab	0.50± 0.03 cd	0.15± 0.04 ab	252.00± 26.78 bcd	399.40± 51.18 bc
	Z8	78.41± 13.86 ab	13.95± 2.32 a	0.57± 0.03 cd	0.20± 0.03 a	271.17± 29.36 bcd	406.33± 71.74 bc
	Z9	47.32± 9.68 cd	12.33± 1.59 ab	0.82± 0.25 a	0.13± 0.01 ab	289.33± 17.38 bc	299.67± 43.17 cd
	Z10	45.36± 5.09 cd	14.37± 0.92 a	0.56± 0.03 cd	0.12± 0.03 bc	189.50± 20.64 bcde	331.50± 20.41 c
	Z11	46.17± 9.34 cd	14.97± 3.25 a	0.51± 0.02 cd	0.10± 0.02 bc	128.33± 24.79 cde	287.00± 38.33 cd
	Z12	—	—	—	—	—	—
波尔多红 C. morifolium	Z1	45.10± 5.29 de	10.58± 1.14 def	0.76± 0.02 a	0.20± 0.02 cde	80.33± 6.73 c	248.17± 27.54 e
‘Boerduohong’	Z2	39.11± 4.89 e	8.41± 0.99 ef	0.70± 0.03 a	0.14± 0.02 de	95.33± 9.53 c	160.50± 18.96 e
	Z3	124.94± 11.00 b	17.55± 1.67 bcd	0.45± 0.01 d	0.20± 0.02 cde	317.50± 37.11 b	545.33± 74.01 bcd
	Z4	116.83± 11.74 b	17.15± 1.68 bcd	0.47± 0.01 cd	0.20± 0.02 cde	423.33± 39.57 ab	773.50± 65.74 b
	Z5	46.96± 7.72 de	8.01± 1.33 f	0.55± 0.03 b	0.11± 0.02 e	126.67± 18.99 c	145.00± 35.23 e
	Z6	139.59± 9.83 ab	25.02± 2.66 ab	0.56± 0.03 b	0.36± 0.05 a	487.00± 53.85 a	1 222.50± 120.14 a
	Z7	174.10± 30.21 a	26.91± 4.56 a	0.49± 0.02 bcd	0.33± 0.06 ab	512.83± 78.00 a	1 090.67± 205.92 a
	Z8	138.65± 15.88 ab	21.97± 2.27 abc	0.51± 0.02 bcd	0.28± 0.03 abc	396.33± 73.98 ab	659.17± 62.59 bc
	Z9	113.19± 32.43 bc	18.30± 4.99 bcd	0.53± 0.02 bc	0.24± 0.06 bcd	181.00± 63.30 c	396.83± 137.94 cde
	Z10	90.39± 3.99 bcd	16.05± 1.19 cde	0.56± 0.02 b	0.23± 0.02 bcd	115.00± 7.20 c	330.17± 27.54 de
	Z11	66.77± 9.38 cde	10.47± 1.07 def	0.52± 0.03 bc	0.13± 0.01 de	131.17± 15.52 c	224.67± 35.01 e
	Z12	—	—	—	—	—	—
黄芙蓉 C. morifolium	Z1	125.57± 11.34 ab	27.02± 3.08 a	0.68± 0.03 a	0.47± 0.06 a	212.83± 14.84 bc	831.50± 121.28 ab
‘Huangfurong’	Z2	34.71± 1.37 c	7.93± 0.37 c	0.73± 0.03 a	0.15± 0.01 b	113.67± 17.97 c	168.33± 12.05 c
	Z3	115.44± 13.65 ab	15.26± 1.54 bc	0.43± 0.01 b	0.16± 0.01 b	397.67± 79.14 a	418.17± 57.17 bc
	Z4	155.97± 14.02 ab	20.34± 2.23 ab	0.41± 0.01 b	0.21± 0.03 b	469.50± 41.28 a	1 022.33± 116.65 a
	Z5	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Z6	167.34± 34.96 a	27.02± 5.17 a	0.44± 0.01 b	0.21± 0.06 b	478.17± 104.55 a	1 071.17± 299.02 a
	Z7	145.07± 3.59 ab	21.26± 1.47 ab	0.47± 0.03 b	0.25± 0.03 b	339.25± 13.70 ab	800.75± 59.81 ab
	Z8	142.57± 35.01 ab	18.79± 4.85 ab	0.41± 0.02 b	0.20± 0.05 b	324.00± 52.62 ab	552.83± 131.49 bc
	Z9	97.63± 16.30 b	16.36± 2.38 bc	0.42± 0.02 b	0.17± 0.03 b	129.00± 35.09 c	485.75± 71.92 bc
	Z10	99.89± 11.60 ab	14.15± 1.35 bc	0.46± 0.03 b	0.16± 0.01 b	125.50± 20.59 c	431.00± 37.52 bc
	Z11	113.75± 17.64 ab	16.16± 2.23 bc	0.46± 0.02 b	0.19± 0.02 b	187.83± 28.95 bc	402.50± 44.66 bc
	Z12	—	—	—	—	—	—

品种 Cultivar	处理 Treatment	生根率 Rooting rate	成活率 Survival rate	总根长 Total root length	根总表面积 Total root surface area	根平均直径 Average root diameter	总根体积 Total root volume	根尖数 Number of root tip	根分叉数 Number of root fork	综合评分 Comprehensive grade	排名 Ranking
辉煌	Z1	1.000	1.000	0.434	0.535	0.727	0.650	0.176	0.369	0.611	8
Chrysanthemum	Z2	1.000	1.000	0.229	0.277	1.000	0.450	0.093	0.105	0.519	10
morifolium	Z3	1.000	1.000	0.380	0.349	0.557	0.300	0.370	0.201	0.520	9
‘Huihuang’	Z4	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.860	0.489	0.700	1.000	1.000	0.881	1
	Z5	0.583	0.333	0.128	0.215	0.864	0.300	0.076	0.088	0.323	11
	Z6	0.917	0.917	0.874	0.778	0.511	0.650	0.486	0.832	0.746	3
	Z7	0.833	0.750	0.600	0.731	0.568	0.750	0.403	0.602	0.655	5
	Z8	0.917	0.917	0.824	0.932	0.648	1.000	0.434	0.612	0.785	2
	Z9	0.833	0.917	0.498	0.824	0.932	0.650	0.463	0.451	0.696	4
	Z10	0.833	0.833	0.477	0.960	0.636	0.600	0.303	0.499	0.643	6
	Z11	0.917	0.833	0.485	1.000	0.580	0.500	0.205	0.432	0.619	7
	Z12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	12
波尔多红	Z1	1.000	1.000	0.259	0.393	1.000	0.556	0.157	0.203	0.571	8
C. morifolium	Z2	1.000	1.000	0.225	0.313	0.921	0.389	0.186	0.131	0.521	10
‘Boerduohong’	Z3	1.000	1.000	0.718	0.652	0.592	0.556	0.619	0.446	0.698	5
	Z4	1.000	1.000	0.671	0.637	0.618	0.556	0.825	0.633	0.743	4
	Z5	0.833	0.667	0.270	0.298	0.724	0.306	0.247	0.119	0.433	11
	Z6	1.000	1.000	0.802	0.930	0.737	1.000	0.950	1.000	0.927	2
	Z7	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.645	0.917	1.000	0.892	0.932	1
	Z8	1.000	1.000	0.796	0.816	0.671	0.778	0.773	0.539	0.797	3
	Z9	0.917	0.917	0.650	0.680	0.697	0.667	0.353	0.325	0.651	6
	Z10	1.000	1.000	0.519	0.596	0.737	0.639	0.224	0.270	0.623	7
	Z11	1.000	1.000	0.384	0.389	0.684	0.361	0.256	0.184	0.532	9
	Z12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	12
黄芙蓉	Z1	1.000	1.000	0.750	1.000	0.932	1.000	0.445	0.776	0.863	2
C. morifolium	Z2	1.000	1.000	0.207	0.293	1.000	0.319	0.238	0.157	0.527	10
‘Huangfurong’	Z3	1.000	1.000	0.690	0.565	0.589	0.340	0.832	0.390	0.676	6
	Z4	1.000	1.000	0.932	0.753	0.562	0.447	0.982	0.954	0.829	3
	Z5	0.250	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.031	11
	Z6	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.603	0.447	1.000	1.000	0.881	1
	Z7	0.917	0.667	0.867	0.787	0.644	0.532	0.709	0.748	0.734	4
	Z8	1.000	1.000	0.852	0.695	0.562	0.426	0.678	0.516	0.716	5
	Z9	0.917	0.750	0.583	0.605	0.575	0.362	0.270	0.453	0.564	8
	Z10	0.833	0.667	0.597	0.524	0.630	0.340	0.262	0.402	0.532	9
	Z11	1.000	1.000	0.680	0.598	0.630	0.404	0.393	0.376	0.635	7
	Z12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	12

[1]	傅志强, 刘祯, 马春花, 温梦玲, 奚如春. 生物炭及炭基肥对土壤质量与植物生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1634-1645.
[2]	朱学慧, 谢辉, 韩守安, 王敏, 白世践, 马云龙, 王艳蒙, 麦斯乐, 潘明启, 张雯. 两种植物生长调节剂对无核白鸡心葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1309-1319.
[3]	赵黎明, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰. 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量、品质与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
[4]	鲁子正钢, 朱立新, 季宏兵, 汪康. 鞘氨醇单胞菌修复土壤重金属污染研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1208-1216.
[5]	廖雪环, 张坷塬, 阿尔力色, 周林, 杨尔倮, 邓俊, 张荣萍. 柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2447-2455.
[6]	王菲, 韩宇杰, 房义, 向海, 常潇, 钟荣珍. 不同培养时间金针菇栽培基质的饲用营养价值评定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 75-83.
[7]	陆兰菲, 赵学平, 马正, 方楠, 骆玉琴, 王晓梅, 叶会, 雷圆, 王强, 张昌朋. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱-质谱联用法测定铁皮石斛中2,4-表芸苔素内酯残留[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1896-1903.
[8]	尤翠翠, 贺一哲, 徐鹏, 黄亚茹, 王辉, 何海兵, 柯健, 武立权. 高温胁迫对水稻生长发育的伤害效应及其防御对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 10-22.
[9]	马义胜, 洪春来, 王卫平, 姚燕来, 朱凤香, 陈晓旸, 薛智勇. 铁皮石斛栽培废料和菇渣配制基质对草莓生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(7): 1175-1181.
[10]	佟静, 李素艳, 孙向阳, 刘克锋, 王宏伟, 杨美燕. 供磷水平对一串红橙香公主生长及根系发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(3): 386-392.
[11]	华晓琴1，刘高亮2，张庆辉2，张鲁1，章婷1，钟宇1， *. 大巴山粉葛组织培养技术[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(7): 1108-.
[12]	祁娟霞，韦峰，董艳，张亚红*. 不同补光时间对日光温室甜瓜生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(6): 979-.
[13]	徐敏;汪少敏;周虹;张海珍;付晓陆 . 植物生长调节剂NAA和6-BA对红蓝石蒜种球营养生长及内源激素的影响[J]. , 2013, 25(4): 0-771.
[14]	赵黎明;李建英;张志刚;项洪涛;郑殿峰 . 不同植物生长调节剂对大豆光合及产量特性的影响[J]. , 2009, 21(3): 0-258.
[15]	鲍滨福;马建义;张齐生;叶良明;王品维. 竹醋液作为植物生长调节剂的开发研究:(Ⅱ)田间试验[J]. , 2006, 18(4): 0-272.