浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 1003-1014.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230798
赵黎明(), 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰*(
)
收稿日期:
2023-06-27
出版日期:
2024-05-25
发布日期:
2024-05-29
作者简介:
赵黎明(1980—),男,黑龙江海伦人,博士,副研究员,主要从事作物高效生产与智控抗逆研究。E-mail:nxyzlm@gdou.edu.cn
通讯作者:
* 冯乃杰,E-mail:DAQINGfnj@163.com
基金资助:
ZHAO Liming(), WANG Yaxin, JIANG Wenxin, DUAN Shaobiao, SHEN Xuefeng, ZHENG Dianfeng, FENG Naijie*(
)
Received:
2023-06-27
Online:
2024-05-25
Published:
2024-05-29
摘要:
为探究植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻光合特性、产量与品质的影响,以绥粳18、垦稻12和三江6为试验材料,研究剑叶展开期喷施脱落酸(ABA)、6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)、己酸二乙氨基乙醇酯(DA-6)、亚精胺(Spd)、3-吲哚丁酸(IBA)、3,5-二硝基水杨酸(SA)、油菜素内酯(BL)、玉米素(ZT)、三十烷醇(TRIA)、茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)和N6-呋喃甲基腺嘌呤(KT)对水稻产量、品质和光合特性的影响。结果表明:与对照(CK)相比,喷施BL提高了抽穗后水稻干物质积累和茎鞘物质转运能力,增加了每穗粒重、千粒重、结实率和粒叶比,两年平均增产7.61%;喷施6-BA有利于延长抽穗期至蜡熟期绿叶面积持续期,改善抽穗后光合特性,增加每穗粒数、每穗粒重、千粒重和粒叶比,两年平均增产6.40%;而喷施DA-6、ZT、ABA、Spd、IBA、SA和KT的增产效果存在品种和年份间稳定性差异。在品质上,喷施DA-6和ZT提高了精米率和整精米率,改善了稻米外观品质。综上,剑叶展开期喷施BL和6-BA有利于供试品种增产,而喷施DA-6和ZT则更有利于稳产或增产前提下提质。
中图分类号:
赵黎明, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰. 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量、品质与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
ZHAO Liming, WANG Yaxin, JIANG Wenxin, DUAN Shaobiao, SHEN Xuefeng, ZHENG Dianfeng, FENG Naijie. Effects of plant growth regulators on yield, quality and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality japonica rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
植物生长调节剂Plant growth regulator | 化学式 Chemical formula | 分子量 Molecular weight | 品牌 Brand | CAS号 Number of CAS | 最佳施用浓度 Optimum concentration | 溶解试剂 Reagent dissolution | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
简写 Abbreviation | 名称 Name | ||||||
ABA | 脱落酸Abscisic acid | C15H20O4 | 264.32 | Sigma-Aldrich® | 21293-29-8 | 20 mg·L-1★ | C2H5OH |
6-BA | 6-苄氨基腺嘌呤 | C12H11N5 | 225.26 | Phygene® | 162714-86-5 | 30 mg·L-1▲ | H2O |
6-Benzylaminopurine | |||||||
DA-6 | 己酸二乙氨基乙醇酯 | C12H25NO2 | 215.33 | YH® | 10369-83-2 | 50 mg·L-1▲ | H2O |
Diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate | |||||||
Spd | 亚精胺Spermidine | C7H19N3 | 145.20 | Aladdin® | 124-20-9 | 1 mmol·L-1▲ | H2O |
IBA | 3-吲哚丁酸 | C12H13NO2 | 203.24 | OKR® | 133-32-4 | 30 mg·L-1★ | C2H5OH |
Indole-3-butyric acid | |||||||
SA | 3,5二硝基水杨酸 | C7H4N2O7 | 228.12 | Aladdin® | 609-99-4 | 0.5 mmol·L-1★ | C2H5OH |
3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid | |||||||
BL | 油菜素内酯Brassinolide | C28H48O6 | 480.68 | Aladdin® | 72962-43-7 | 0.1 mg·L-1▲ | H2O |
ZT | 玉米素Zeatin | C10H13N5O | 219.24 | Tyuhk® | 1637-39-4 | 0.05 mmol·L-1▲ | C2H5OH |
TRIA | 三十烷醇Triacontanol | C30H62O | 438.82 | J&K® | 593-50-0 | 1.5 mg·L-1▲ | CHCl3 |
MeJA | 茉莉酸甲酯Methyl jasmonate | C13H20O3 | 224.30 | OKR® | 1211-29-6 | 0.15 mmol·L-1▲ | C2H5OH |
KT | N6-呋喃甲基腺嘌呤 | C10H9N5O | 215.21 | Aladdin® | 525-79-1 | 0.15 mmol·L-1★ | CH3COOH |
N6-Furfuryladenine | |||||||
CK | 水Water | H2O | 18.02 | 7732-18-5 | 225 L·hm-2 |
表1 植物生长调节剂简介与使用浓度
Table 1 Brief introduction and concentration of plant growth regulator
植物生长调节剂Plant growth regulator | 化学式 Chemical formula | 分子量 Molecular weight | 品牌 Brand | CAS号 Number of CAS | 最佳施用浓度 Optimum concentration | 溶解试剂 Reagent dissolution | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
简写 Abbreviation | 名称 Name | ||||||
ABA | 脱落酸Abscisic acid | C15H20O4 | 264.32 | Sigma-Aldrich® | 21293-29-8 | 20 mg·L-1★ | C2H5OH |
6-BA | 6-苄氨基腺嘌呤 | C12H11N5 | 225.26 | Phygene® | 162714-86-5 | 30 mg·L-1▲ | H2O |
6-Benzylaminopurine | |||||||
DA-6 | 己酸二乙氨基乙醇酯 | C12H25NO2 | 215.33 | YH® | 10369-83-2 | 50 mg·L-1▲ | H2O |
Diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate | |||||||
Spd | 亚精胺Spermidine | C7H19N3 | 145.20 | Aladdin® | 124-20-9 | 1 mmol·L-1▲ | H2O |
IBA | 3-吲哚丁酸 | C12H13NO2 | 203.24 | OKR® | 133-32-4 | 30 mg·L-1★ | C2H5OH |
Indole-3-butyric acid | |||||||
SA | 3,5二硝基水杨酸 | C7H4N2O7 | 228.12 | Aladdin® | 609-99-4 | 0.5 mmol·L-1★ | C2H5OH |
3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid | |||||||
BL | 油菜素内酯Brassinolide | C28H48O6 | 480.68 | Aladdin® | 72962-43-7 | 0.1 mg·L-1▲ | H2O |
ZT | 玉米素Zeatin | C10H13N5O | 219.24 | Tyuhk® | 1637-39-4 | 0.05 mmol·L-1▲ | C2H5OH |
TRIA | 三十烷醇Triacontanol | C30H62O | 438.82 | J&K® | 593-50-0 | 1.5 mg·L-1▲ | CHCl3 |
MeJA | 茉莉酸甲酯Methyl jasmonate | C13H20O3 | 224.30 | OKR® | 1211-29-6 | 0.15 mmol·L-1▲ | C2H5OH |
KT | N6-呋喃甲基腺嘌呤 | C10H9N5O | 215.21 | Aladdin® | 525-79-1 | 0.15 mmol·L-1★ | CH3COOH |
N6-Furfuryladenine | |||||||
CK | 水Water | H2O | 18.02 | 7732-18-5 | 225 L·hm-2 |
处理 Treatment | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 每穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle/g | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
ABA | 102.07 a | 97.46 a | 1.98 bc | 2.07 d | 25.42 ef | 25.91 e | 76.59 d | 82.41 c | 8 387.06 cd | 8 884.92 d |
6-BA | 97.98 b | 96.19 a | 2.08 a | 2.19 b | 25.94 cd | 26.43 b | 81.79 c | 89.38 a | 8 789.03 b | 9 722.27 a |
DA-6 | 95.59 c | 96.52 a | 2.00 b | 2.19 b | 25.82 cde | 26.33 bc | 82.47 c | 87.47 a | 8 538.12 c | 9 414.09 b |
Spd | 93.00 de | 93.49 b | 1.98 bc | 2.06 d | 25.81 cde | 26.30 bc | 82.71 c | 84.23 bc | 8 400.96 cd | 8 840.68 d |
IBA | 92.64 de | 96.37 a | 1.96 bc | 2.11 cd | 25.53 def | 26.02 de | 83.11 c | 84.53 bc | 8 347.94 cd | 9 052.15 cd |
SA | 91.81 e | 95.68 ab | 1.96 bc | 2.10 cd | 25.18 f | 25.67 f | 85.89 b | 86.50 ab | 8 347.17 cd | 9 025.43 cd |
BL | 92.77 de | 96.06 a | 2.12 a | 2.25 a | 26.64 a | 26.30 bc | 86.67 b | 89.32 a | 9 029.52 a | 9 675.90 a |
ZT | 83.54 g | 91.57 c | 2.00 b | 2.15 bc | 26.28 ab | 26.77 a | 92.01 a | 89.14 a | 8 520.66 c | 9 262.55 bc |
TRIA | 84.51 fg | 88.30 d | 1.95 c | 2.09 d | 26.35 ab | 26.67 a | 88.04 b | 89.21 a | 8 278.93 d | 8 947.96 d |
MeJA | 85.98 f | 91.17 c | 1.94 c | 2.10 cd | 25.95 bcd | 26.17 cd | 88.29 b | 88.57 a | 8 282.01 d | 9 016.15 cd |
KT | 94.52 cd | 95.97 a | 1.97 bc | 2.21 ab | 25.88 bcd | 26.37 bc | 80.76 c | 87.63 a | 8 323.11 cd | 9 498.82 ab |
CK | 94.81 cd | 96.20 a | 1.99 bc | 2.11 cd | 25.78 cde | 26.20 cd | 82.39 c | 84.40 bc | 8 311.27 cd | 9 081.09 cd |
SJ18 | 96.16 b | 97.95 b | 2.12 a | 2.25 b | 26.04 b | 26.46 b | 85.11 a | 86.94 b | 8 504.36 b | 8 999.30 a |
KD12 | 75.27 c | 78.19 c | 1.72 b | 1.90 c | 27.06 a | 27.29 a | 84.75 a | 89.15 a | 8 752.17 a | 9 239.89 a |
SJ6 | 105.88 a | 107.61 a | 2.15 a | 2.28 a | 24.54 c | 25.03 c | 82.81b | 84.61c | 8 177.41 c | 8 415.56 b |
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||
Y | 223.87** | 25.03* | 74.53** | 420.25** | 307.66** | |||||
P | 6.35* | 4.13* | 8.79** | 13.51** | 4.73* | 20.11** | 4.28** | 6.60** | 11.39** | 13.66** |
V | 906.78** | 691.07** | 76.80** | 543.72** | 5.21* | 381.46** | 140.26** | 33.11** | 74.82** | 72.72** |
P×V | 10.97** | 3.53** | 7.33** | 3.43* | 8.40* | 4.53* | 12.59** | 5.34* | 11.55** | 3.16* |
表2 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量及其构成的影响
Table 2 Effect of plant growth regulator on yield and its components of high-quality japonica rice
处理 Treatment | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 每穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle/g | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
ABA | 102.07 a | 97.46 a | 1.98 bc | 2.07 d | 25.42 ef | 25.91 e | 76.59 d | 82.41 c | 8 387.06 cd | 8 884.92 d |
6-BA | 97.98 b | 96.19 a | 2.08 a | 2.19 b | 25.94 cd | 26.43 b | 81.79 c | 89.38 a | 8 789.03 b | 9 722.27 a |
DA-6 | 95.59 c | 96.52 a | 2.00 b | 2.19 b | 25.82 cde | 26.33 bc | 82.47 c | 87.47 a | 8 538.12 c | 9 414.09 b |
Spd | 93.00 de | 93.49 b | 1.98 bc | 2.06 d | 25.81 cde | 26.30 bc | 82.71 c | 84.23 bc | 8 400.96 cd | 8 840.68 d |
IBA | 92.64 de | 96.37 a | 1.96 bc | 2.11 cd | 25.53 def | 26.02 de | 83.11 c | 84.53 bc | 8 347.94 cd | 9 052.15 cd |
SA | 91.81 e | 95.68 ab | 1.96 bc | 2.10 cd | 25.18 f | 25.67 f | 85.89 b | 86.50 ab | 8 347.17 cd | 9 025.43 cd |
BL | 92.77 de | 96.06 a | 2.12 a | 2.25 a | 26.64 a | 26.30 bc | 86.67 b | 89.32 a | 9 029.52 a | 9 675.90 a |
ZT | 83.54 g | 91.57 c | 2.00 b | 2.15 bc | 26.28 ab | 26.77 a | 92.01 a | 89.14 a | 8 520.66 c | 9 262.55 bc |
TRIA | 84.51 fg | 88.30 d | 1.95 c | 2.09 d | 26.35 ab | 26.67 a | 88.04 b | 89.21 a | 8 278.93 d | 8 947.96 d |
MeJA | 85.98 f | 91.17 c | 1.94 c | 2.10 cd | 25.95 bcd | 26.17 cd | 88.29 b | 88.57 a | 8 282.01 d | 9 016.15 cd |
KT | 94.52 cd | 95.97 a | 1.97 bc | 2.21 ab | 25.88 bcd | 26.37 bc | 80.76 c | 87.63 a | 8 323.11 cd | 9 498.82 ab |
CK | 94.81 cd | 96.20 a | 1.99 bc | 2.11 cd | 25.78 cde | 26.20 cd | 82.39 c | 84.40 bc | 8 311.27 cd | 9 081.09 cd |
SJ18 | 96.16 b | 97.95 b | 2.12 a | 2.25 b | 26.04 b | 26.46 b | 85.11 a | 86.94 b | 8 504.36 b | 8 999.30 a |
KD12 | 75.27 c | 78.19 c | 1.72 b | 1.90 c | 27.06 a | 27.29 a | 84.75 a | 89.15 a | 8 752.17 a | 9 239.89 a |
SJ6 | 105.88 a | 107.61 a | 2.15 a | 2.28 a | 24.54 c | 25.03 c | 82.81b | 84.61c | 8 177.41 c | 8 415.56 b |
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||
Y | 223.87** | 25.03* | 74.53** | 420.25** | 307.66** | |||||
P | 6.35* | 4.13* | 8.79** | 13.51** | 4.73* | 20.11** | 4.28** | 6.60** | 11.39** | 13.66** |
V | 906.78** | 691.07** | 76.80** | 543.72** | 5.21* | 381.46** | 140.26** | 33.11** | 74.82** | 72.72** |
P×V | 10.97** | 3.53** | 7.33** | 3.43* | 8.40* | 4.53* | 12.59** | 5.34* | 11.55** | 3.16* |
图2 不同品种优质粳稻的有效穗数 SJ18,绥粳18;KD12,垦稻12;SJ6,三江6;Y,年份;V,品种;Y×V,年份×品种。
Fig.2 Effective panicles of different high-quality japonica rice varieties SJ18, Suijing 18; KD12, Kendao 12; SJ6, Sanjiang 6; Y, Year; V, Variety; Y×V, Year×Variety.
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate | 垩百度 Chalkiness degree | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |||||||||||
ABA | 81.74 a | 81.53 d | 70.84 f | 70.98 f | 66.04 c | 66.16 bc | 8.65 b | 10.63 a | 3.54 de | 4.43 c | ||||||||||
6-BA | 81.97 a | 81.31 de | 71.25 de | 71.55 d | 67.29 ab | 66.06 bc | 7.27 c | 8.82 b | 2.95 ef | 3.88 d | ||||||||||
DA-6 | 82.00 a | 82.22 a | 71.91 ab | 72.23 b | 67.77 a | 67.22 a | 6.71 d | 5.64 d | 2.04 g | 2.58 e | ||||||||||
Spd | 81.83 a | 81.03 e | 71.65 bc | 71.36 e | 66.78 b | 65.63 cd | 11.66 a | 10.23 a | 8.27 a | 5.35 b | ||||||||||
IBA | 81.83 a | 81.83 c | 71.79 bc | 72.00 c | 66.04 c | 65.85 bc | 8.69 b | 4.35 e | 3.97 d | 5.10 bc | ||||||||||
SA | 81.81 a | 81.53 d | 71.55 bc | 71.90 c | 64.40 e | 64.83 de | 9.28 b | 6.77 cd | 6.52 b | 6.59 a | ||||||||||
BL | 81.20 a | 81.79 c | 71.40 cd | 71.78 c | 64.08 e | 65.58 cd | 9.49 b | 9.76 b | 5.68 c | 5.65 b | ||||||||||
ZT | 81.47 a | 82.13 ab | 72.43 a | 72.50 a | 65.81 c | 67.30 a | 6.37 cd | 3.24 f | 2.16 g | 2.19 e | ||||||||||
TRIA | 81.30 a | 81.72 cd | 72.03 ab | 71.98 c | 65.42 cd | 65.90 bc | 5.97 d | 4.94 e | 2.40 fg | 3.78 d | ||||||||||
MeJA | 81.33 a | 81.61 d | 71.27 de | 71.65 d | 62.13 f | 64.41 e | 6.54 d | 5.41 de | 3.10 ef | 3.79 d | ||||||||||
KT | 81.88 a | 82.08 b | 72.09 ab | 72.31 b | 65.09 d | 66.65 ab | 7.25 c | 7.80 c | 3.85 d | 4.13 cd | ||||||||||
CK | 81.89 a | 81.83 c | 71.14 e | 71.82 c | 62.31 f | 65.95 bc | 6.77 d | 5.91 d | 2.94 ef | 4.72 c | ||||||||||
SJ18 | 82.14 a | 81.84 a | 72.26 a | 72.31 a | 66.12 a | 66.18 b | 2.93 c | 5.15 b | 1.18 b | 5.05 a | ||||||||||
KD12 | 82.03 a | 82.01 a | 71.49 b | 71.79 b | 64.43 c | 67.05 a | 15.94 a | 9.52 a | 9.34 a | 4.53 a | ||||||||||
SJ6 | 80.81 b | 80.75 b | 71.08 c | 71.23 c | 65.24 b | 65.32 c | 4.87 b | 6.22 b | 1.33 b | 4.46 a | ||||||||||
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||
Y | 0.05ns | 10.23* | 2.79ns | 3.04ns | 1.35ns | |||||||||||||||
P | 2.41ns | 5.93* | 6.97* | 18.18* | 60.64** | 10.18** | 25.71** | 30.14** | 59.71** | 13.70** | ||||||||||
V | 104.21** | 414.52** | 47.31** | 214.83** | 54.25** | 379.06** | 1 823.22** | 28.49** | 1 415.24** | 2.83ns | ||||||||||
P×V | 1.16ns | 2.35ns | 1.27ns | 4.96* | 41.32** | 7.21* | 25.17** | 10.27** | 49.04** | 1.97ns |
表3 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻碾磨品质和外观品质的影响
Table 3 Effects of plant growth regulator on milling quality and appearance quality of high-quality japonica rice %
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate | 垩百度 Chalkiness degree | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |||||||||||
ABA | 81.74 a | 81.53 d | 70.84 f | 70.98 f | 66.04 c | 66.16 bc | 8.65 b | 10.63 a | 3.54 de | 4.43 c | ||||||||||
6-BA | 81.97 a | 81.31 de | 71.25 de | 71.55 d | 67.29 ab | 66.06 bc | 7.27 c | 8.82 b | 2.95 ef | 3.88 d | ||||||||||
DA-6 | 82.00 a | 82.22 a | 71.91 ab | 72.23 b | 67.77 a | 67.22 a | 6.71 d | 5.64 d | 2.04 g | 2.58 e | ||||||||||
Spd | 81.83 a | 81.03 e | 71.65 bc | 71.36 e | 66.78 b | 65.63 cd | 11.66 a | 10.23 a | 8.27 a | 5.35 b | ||||||||||
IBA | 81.83 a | 81.83 c | 71.79 bc | 72.00 c | 66.04 c | 65.85 bc | 8.69 b | 4.35 e | 3.97 d | 5.10 bc | ||||||||||
SA | 81.81 a | 81.53 d | 71.55 bc | 71.90 c | 64.40 e | 64.83 de | 9.28 b | 6.77 cd | 6.52 b | 6.59 a | ||||||||||
BL | 81.20 a | 81.79 c | 71.40 cd | 71.78 c | 64.08 e | 65.58 cd | 9.49 b | 9.76 b | 5.68 c | 5.65 b | ||||||||||
ZT | 81.47 a | 82.13 ab | 72.43 a | 72.50 a | 65.81 c | 67.30 a | 6.37 cd | 3.24 f | 2.16 g | 2.19 e | ||||||||||
TRIA | 81.30 a | 81.72 cd | 72.03 ab | 71.98 c | 65.42 cd | 65.90 bc | 5.97 d | 4.94 e | 2.40 fg | 3.78 d | ||||||||||
MeJA | 81.33 a | 81.61 d | 71.27 de | 71.65 d | 62.13 f | 64.41 e | 6.54 d | 5.41 de | 3.10 ef | 3.79 d | ||||||||||
KT | 81.88 a | 82.08 b | 72.09 ab | 72.31 b | 65.09 d | 66.65 ab | 7.25 c | 7.80 c | 3.85 d | 4.13 cd | ||||||||||
CK | 81.89 a | 81.83 c | 71.14 e | 71.82 c | 62.31 f | 65.95 bc | 6.77 d | 5.91 d | 2.94 ef | 4.72 c | ||||||||||
SJ18 | 82.14 a | 81.84 a | 72.26 a | 72.31 a | 66.12 a | 66.18 b | 2.93 c | 5.15 b | 1.18 b | 5.05 a | ||||||||||
KD12 | 82.03 a | 82.01 a | 71.49 b | 71.79 b | 64.43 c | 67.05 a | 15.94 a | 9.52 a | 9.34 a | 4.53 a | ||||||||||
SJ6 | 80.81 b | 80.75 b | 71.08 c | 71.23 c | 65.24 b | 65.32 c | 4.87 b | 6.22 b | 1.33 b | 4.46 a | ||||||||||
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||
Y | 0.05ns | 10.23* | 2.79ns | 3.04ns | 1.35ns | |||||||||||||||
P | 2.41ns | 5.93* | 6.97* | 18.18* | 60.64** | 10.18** | 25.71** | 30.14** | 59.71** | 13.70** | ||||||||||
V | 104.21** | 414.52** | 47.31** | 214.83** | 54.25** | 379.06** | 1 823.22** | 28.49** | 1 415.24** | 2.83ns | ||||||||||
P×V | 1.16ns | 2.35ns | 1.27ns | 4.96* | 41.32** | 7.21* | 25.17** | 10.27** | 49.04** | 1.97ns |
处理 Treatment | 抽穗期生物量 Biomass of heading stage/(g·m-2) | 成熟期生物量 Biomass of maturity stage/(g·m-2) | 输出量 Exportation/ (g·m-2) | 输出率 Export rate/% | 转化率 Translocation rate/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
ABA | 826.98 ab | 835.62 b | 1 451.33 b | 1 477.52 de | 178.50 e | 188.56 de | 28.95 de | 30.61e | 24.50 b | 23.08 bcd |
6-BA | 843.40 ab | 875.26 a | 1 433.55 bcd | 1 675.34 a | 216.25 b | 244.19 a | 33.69 b | 37.10 a | 26.34 a | 27.63 a |
DA-6 | 832.42 ab | 866.35 a | 1 420.98 cdef | 1 576.48 c | 213.05 b | 236.25 a | 35.65 a | 36.51 ab | 23.14 bc | 26.75 a |
Spd | 836.44 ab | 825.55 b | 1 405.22 ef | 1 446.58 e | 185.51 de | 195.68 d | 27.90 f | 29.75 f | 21.55 d | 21.20 e |
IBA | 830.05 ab | 829.63 b | 1 350.07 g | 1 409.27 f | 104.91 h | 175.36 e | 18.58 i | 25.64 i | 11.86 h | 17.90 f |
SA | 831.00 ab | 839.67 b | 1 401.26 f | 1 485.69 d | 145.29 g | 188.96 d | 22.15 h | 26.83 h | 17.21 g | 21.66 de |
BL | 838.42 ab | 859.76 ab | 1 673.90 a | 1 627.59 ab | 228.30 a | 248.01 a | 33.37 b | 36.34 b | 26.63 a | 27.53 a |
ZT | 849.20 a | 880.25 a | 1 449.25 bc | 1 609.38 bc | 216.08 b | 239.66 a | 32.68 c | 35.48 c | 23.97 b | 26.54 a |
TRIA | 827.28 b | 841.11 ab | 1 413.67 def | 1 466.63 e | 162.68 f | 185.63 de | 25.04 g | 28.09 g | 19.10 f | 22.52 cde |
MeJA | 833.82 ab | 840.05 b | 1 438.76 bcd | 1 500.01 d | 182.89 e | 210.35 c | 28.62 e | 33.26 d | 20.15 e | 24.40 b |
KT | 830.51 ab | 866.25 ab | 1 404.04 ef | 1 635.28 ab | 188.33 d | 228.76 b | 29.30 d | 35.45 c | 21.47 d | 26.65 a |
CK | 835.09 ab | 849.76 b | 1 398.07 f | 1 499.86 d | 208.72 c | 215.18 bc | 32.51 c | 33.43 d | 22.92 c | 23.95 bc |
SJ18 | 845.98 b | 870.19 a | 1 478.73 a | 1 558.76 a | 161.06 b | 210.08b | 24.96 b | 31.60 b | 18.66 b | 25.13 b |
KD12 | 864.66 a | 842.53 b | 1 416.82 b | 1 475.86 b | 256.78 a | 247.75 a | 34.09 a | 34.24 a | 26.31 a | 26.63 a |
SJ6 | 791.24 c | 839.42 b | 1 414.48 b | 1 567.64 a | 137.30 c | 181.25c | 23.48 c | 28.18 c | 16.35 c | 19.28 c |
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||
Y | 11.25* | 23.53* | 28.51** | 37.81** | 11.72* | |||||
P | 2.55ns | 4.39* | 70.95** | 6.85* | 660.05** | 32.55** | 657.22** | 330.97** | 167.79** | 30.89** |
V | 355.92** | 101.25** | 59.44** | 1014.11** | 88.06** | 855.26** | 570.04** | 66.83** | 1182.75** | 1289.11** |
P×V | 0.48ns | 1.98ns | 47.53** | 22.19** | 365.27** | 14.85** | 35.18** | 11.85* | 10.87** | 5.76* |
表4 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻生物量和茎鞘物质转运的影响
Table 4 Effects of plant growth regulator on biomass and dry matter transport in stem and sheath of high-quality japonica rice
处理 Treatment | 抽穗期生物量 Biomass of heading stage/(g·m-2) | 成熟期生物量 Biomass of maturity stage/(g·m-2) | 输出量 Exportation/ (g·m-2) | 输出率 Export rate/% | 转化率 Translocation rate/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
ABA | 826.98 ab | 835.62 b | 1 451.33 b | 1 477.52 de | 178.50 e | 188.56 de | 28.95 de | 30.61e | 24.50 b | 23.08 bcd |
6-BA | 843.40 ab | 875.26 a | 1 433.55 bcd | 1 675.34 a | 216.25 b | 244.19 a | 33.69 b | 37.10 a | 26.34 a | 27.63 a |
DA-6 | 832.42 ab | 866.35 a | 1 420.98 cdef | 1 576.48 c | 213.05 b | 236.25 a | 35.65 a | 36.51 ab | 23.14 bc | 26.75 a |
Spd | 836.44 ab | 825.55 b | 1 405.22 ef | 1 446.58 e | 185.51 de | 195.68 d | 27.90 f | 29.75 f | 21.55 d | 21.20 e |
IBA | 830.05 ab | 829.63 b | 1 350.07 g | 1 409.27 f | 104.91 h | 175.36 e | 18.58 i | 25.64 i | 11.86 h | 17.90 f |
SA | 831.00 ab | 839.67 b | 1 401.26 f | 1 485.69 d | 145.29 g | 188.96 d | 22.15 h | 26.83 h | 17.21 g | 21.66 de |
BL | 838.42 ab | 859.76 ab | 1 673.90 a | 1 627.59 ab | 228.30 a | 248.01 a | 33.37 b | 36.34 b | 26.63 a | 27.53 a |
ZT | 849.20 a | 880.25 a | 1 449.25 bc | 1 609.38 bc | 216.08 b | 239.66 a | 32.68 c | 35.48 c | 23.97 b | 26.54 a |
TRIA | 827.28 b | 841.11 ab | 1 413.67 def | 1 466.63 e | 162.68 f | 185.63 de | 25.04 g | 28.09 g | 19.10 f | 22.52 cde |
MeJA | 833.82 ab | 840.05 b | 1 438.76 bcd | 1 500.01 d | 182.89 e | 210.35 c | 28.62 e | 33.26 d | 20.15 e | 24.40 b |
KT | 830.51 ab | 866.25 ab | 1 404.04 ef | 1 635.28 ab | 188.33 d | 228.76 b | 29.30 d | 35.45 c | 21.47 d | 26.65 a |
CK | 835.09 ab | 849.76 b | 1 398.07 f | 1 499.86 d | 208.72 c | 215.18 bc | 32.51 c | 33.43 d | 22.92 c | 23.95 bc |
SJ18 | 845.98 b | 870.19 a | 1 478.73 a | 1 558.76 a | 161.06 b | 210.08b | 24.96 b | 31.60 b | 18.66 b | 25.13 b |
KD12 | 864.66 a | 842.53 b | 1 416.82 b | 1 475.86 b | 256.78 a | 247.75 a | 34.09 a | 34.24 a | 26.31 a | 26.63 a |
SJ6 | 791.24 c | 839.42 b | 1 414.48 b | 1 567.64 a | 137.30 c | 181.25c | 23.48 c | 28.18 c | 16.35 c | 19.28 c |
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||
Y | 11.25* | 23.53* | 28.51** | 37.81** | 11.72* | |||||
P | 2.55ns | 4.39* | 70.95** | 6.85* | 660.05** | 32.55** | 657.22** | 330.97** | 167.79** | 30.89** |
V | 355.92** | 101.25** | 59.44** | 1014.11** | 88.06** | 855.26** | 570.04** | 66.83** | 1182.75** | 1289.11** |
P×V | 0.48ns | 1.98ns | 47.53** | 22.19** | 365.27** | 14.85** | 35.18** | 11.85* | 10.87** | 5.76* |
处理 Treatment | 抽穗期叶面积指数 LAI of heading stage | 成熟期叶面积指数 LAI of maturity stage | 粒叶比 Grain-leaf ratio/ (mg·cm-2) | 群体生长速率 Population growth rate/(g·m-2·d-1) | 净同化率 Net assimilation rate/ (g·m-2·d-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
ABA | 4.85 ab | 4.93 ab | 2.57 a | 2.11 c | 17.35 d | 18.05 d | 12.92 e | 13.55 d | 3.62 f | 4.35 b |
6-BA | 4.90 a | 5.05 a | 2.08 de | 2.35 b | 17.98 b | 19.65 a | 13.7 bc | 15.47 a | 4.27 b | 5.10 a |
DA-6 | 4.85 ab | 4.99 a | 2.60 a | 2.49 ab | 17.55 bc | 18.63 bc | 13.51 cd | 15.01 b | 4.16 bc | 4.85 ab |
Spd | 4.80 ab | 4.86 bc | 2.36 bc | 1.98 d | 17.76 b | 18.17 d | 13.03 de | 13.85 d | 3.91 de | 3.99 c |
IBA | 4.88 a | 4.79 c | 2.16 cde | 2.41 ab | 17.16 de | 18.09 d | 11.82 f | 12.89 e | 3.64 f | 4.27 b |
SA | 4.86 a | 4.83 bc | 2.35 bc | 2.58 a | 17.72 bc | 18.33 cd | 13.19 de | 13.45 d | 3.82 e | 4.05 c |
BL | 4.83 ab | 4.96 a | 2.45 ab | 2.22 bc | 19.76 a | 19.28 ab | 19.31 a | 15.66 a | 5.54 a | 4.88 ab |
ZT | 4.91 a | 5.03 a | 2.02 de | 2.19 c | 17.59 c | 19.34 ab | 14.35 b | 15.57 a | 4.30 b | 5.07 a |
TRIA | 4.79 ab | 4.75 c | 2.19 cd | 2.46 ab | 17.01 e | 17.99 d | 13.08 de | 13.19 de | 4.07 cd | 4.01 c |
MeJA | 4.84 ab | 4.88 b | 1.97 e | 2.08 d | 17.66 c | 18.37 cd | 13.87 bc | 13.66 d | 4.00 cd | 4.38 b |
KT | 4.70 b | 4.95 ab | 2.30 bc | 2.33 b | 17.08 e | 19.55 a | 13.27 de | 14.58 bc | 3.79 e | 4.95 ab |
CK | 4.81 ab | 4.86 b | 2.07 de | 2.27 bc | 17.48 cd | 18.62 bc | 12.87 e | 14.33 c | 3.93 de | 4.33 b |
SJ18 | 4.92 a | 5.01 a | 2.46 b | 2.41 b | 17.41 b | 19.68 a | 14.59 a | 15.24 a | 4.14 b | 4.65 a |
KD12 | 4.76 b | 4.80 b | 1.62 c | 1.79 c | 18.89 a | 18.55 b | 12.48 c | 13.34 c | 4.27 a | 4.75 a |
SJ6 | 4.90 a | 5.06 a | 2.70 a | 2.68 a | 16.78 c | 17.83 c | 14.23 b | 14.27 b | 3.85 c | 4.01 b |
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||
Y | 11.46* | 0.24ns | 22.01** | 4.45* | 13.95** | |||||
P | 1.53ns | 4.89* | 10.01** | 6.37* | 26.95** | 17.58** | 107.09** | 5.83* | 93.83** | 12.98** |
V | 32.48** | 75.36** | 285.56** | 199.65** | 212.14** | 185.15** | 157.29** | 221.48** | 67.54** | 6.01* |
P×V | 0.57ns | 2.39ns | 5.16* | 4.98* | 19.98** | 9.66** | 62.82** | 17.85** | 56.02** | 4.25* |
表5 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻光合指标的影响
Table 5 Effect of plant growth regulator on photosynthetic indexes of high-quality japonica rice
处理 Treatment | 抽穗期叶面积指数 LAI of heading stage | 成熟期叶面积指数 LAI of maturity stage | 粒叶比 Grain-leaf ratio/ (mg·cm-2) | 群体生长速率 Population growth rate/(g·m-2·d-1) | 净同化率 Net assimilation rate/ (g·m-2·d-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | |
ABA | 4.85 ab | 4.93 ab | 2.57 a | 2.11 c | 17.35 d | 18.05 d | 12.92 e | 13.55 d | 3.62 f | 4.35 b |
6-BA | 4.90 a | 5.05 a | 2.08 de | 2.35 b | 17.98 b | 19.65 a | 13.7 bc | 15.47 a | 4.27 b | 5.10 a |
DA-6 | 4.85 ab | 4.99 a | 2.60 a | 2.49 ab | 17.55 bc | 18.63 bc | 13.51 cd | 15.01 b | 4.16 bc | 4.85 ab |
Spd | 4.80 ab | 4.86 bc | 2.36 bc | 1.98 d | 17.76 b | 18.17 d | 13.03 de | 13.85 d | 3.91 de | 3.99 c |
IBA | 4.88 a | 4.79 c | 2.16 cde | 2.41 ab | 17.16 de | 18.09 d | 11.82 f | 12.89 e | 3.64 f | 4.27 b |
SA | 4.86 a | 4.83 bc | 2.35 bc | 2.58 a | 17.72 bc | 18.33 cd | 13.19 de | 13.45 d | 3.82 e | 4.05 c |
BL | 4.83 ab | 4.96 a | 2.45 ab | 2.22 bc | 19.76 a | 19.28 ab | 19.31 a | 15.66 a | 5.54 a | 4.88 ab |
ZT | 4.91 a | 5.03 a | 2.02 de | 2.19 c | 17.59 c | 19.34 ab | 14.35 b | 15.57 a | 4.30 b | 5.07 a |
TRIA | 4.79 ab | 4.75 c | 2.19 cd | 2.46 ab | 17.01 e | 17.99 d | 13.08 de | 13.19 de | 4.07 cd | 4.01 c |
MeJA | 4.84 ab | 4.88 b | 1.97 e | 2.08 d | 17.66 c | 18.37 cd | 13.87 bc | 13.66 d | 4.00 cd | 4.38 b |
KT | 4.70 b | 4.95 ab | 2.30 bc | 2.33 b | 17.08 e | 19.55 a | 13.27 de | 14.58 bc | 3.79 e | 4.95 ab |
CK | 4.81 ab | 4.86 b | 2.07 de | 2.27 bc | 17.48 cd | 18.62 bc | 12.87 e | 14.33 c | 3.93 de | 4.33 b |
SJ18 | 4.92 a | 5.01 a | 2.46 b | 2.41 b | 17.41 b | 19.68 a | 14.59 a | 15.24 a | 4.14 b | 4.65 a |
KD12 | 4.76 b | 4.80 b | 1.62 c | 1.79 c | 18.89 a | 18.55 b | 12.48 c | 13.34 c | 4.27 a | 4.75 a |
SJ6 | 4.90 a | 5.06 a | 2.70 a | 2.68 a | 16.78 c | 17.83 c | 14.23 b | 14.27 b | 3.85 c | 4.01 b |
显著性分析Significance analysis | ||||||||||
Y | 11.46* | 0.24ns | 22.01** | 4.45* | 13.95** | |||||
P | 1.53ns | 4.89* | 10.01** | 6.37* | 26.95** | 17.58** | 107.09** | 5.83* | 93.83** | 12.98** |
V | 32.48** | 75.36** | 285.56** | 199.65** | 212.14** | 185.15** | 157.29** | 221.48** | 67.54** | 6.01* |
P×V | 0.57ns | 2.39ns | 5.16* | 4.98* | 19.98** | 9.66** | 62.82** | 17.85** | 56.02** | 4.25* |
处理 Treatment | SPAD值 SPAD value | 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1 ) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期Heading stage | 蜡熟期Waxy stage | 抽穗期Heading stage | 蜡熟期Waxy stage | ||||
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2020 | |
ABA | 44.27 de | 43.63 d | 34.18 ef | 34.50 f | 22.80 d | 23.60 cd | 15.18 de |
6-BA | 46.73 a | 46.53 a | 37.99 a | 38.26 a | 25.61 a | 25.75 a | 17.61 a |
DA-6 | 45.58 b | 45.77 b | 37.17 b | 37.26 b | 24.90 ab | 25.22 a | 16.84 ab |
Spd | 44.09 e | 43.44 de | 33.57 f | 33.99 f | 22.30 d | 22.78 d | 14.68 e |
IBA | 43.97 e | 43.60 d | 35.34 d | 35.10 e | 22.83 d | 23.56 cd | 15.35 de |
SA | 42.94 f | 42.68 ef | 36.72 bc | 35.89 d | 22.24 d | 22.64 d | 15.88 cd |
BL | 44.71 cd | 44.78 c | 36.19 c | 37.17 b | 24.20 bc | 24.68 ab | 16.93 ab |
ZT | 44.66 cd | 45.65 b | 37.33 ab | 38.58 a | 24.16 bc | 25.53 a | 17.14 ab |
TRIA | 41.56 f | 42.47 f | 33.99 f | 34.06 f | 20.86 e | 22.52 d | 14.75 e |
MeJA | 42.91 f | 42.69 ef | 31.93 g | 32.65 g | 23.32 cd | 23.05 cd | 14.71 e |
KT | 44.92 c | 45.59 b | 34.90 de | 36.51 c | 24.33 bc | 24.67 ab | 16.63 bc |
CK | 44.23 de | 43.64 d | 33.51 f | 34.51 f | 23.18 cd | 23.89 bc | 15.20 de |
SJ18 | 44.25 b | 44.74 b | 35.42 b | 36.02 b | 23.14 b | 24.50 b | 16.38 b |
KD12 | 42.20 c | 41.55 c | 33.25 c | 33.49 c | 21.08 c | 21.75 c | 14.04 c |
SJ6 | 46.20 a | 46.33 a | 37.04 a | 37.62 a | 24.19 a | 25.72 a | 17.30 a |
显著性分析Significance analysis | |||||||
Y | 0.22ns | 1.42ns | 2.75ns | ||||
P | 66.56** | 46.81** | 32.25** | 94.82** | 12.76** | 12.10** | 15.95** |
V | 619.23** | 195.12** | 369.54** | 407.73** | 157.50** | 263.83** | 133.60** |
P×V | 9.69* | 1.96ns | 6.12** | 5.34* | 1.29ns | 7.22** | 3.34* |
表6 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻SPAD值和剑叶净光合速率的影响
Table 6 Effects of plant growth regulator on SPAD value and net photosynthetic rate of flag leaves in high-quality japonica rice
处理 Treatment | SPAD值 SPAD value | 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1 ) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期Heading stage | 蜡熟期Waxy stage | 抽穗期Heading stage | 蜡熟期Waxy stage | ||||
2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2020 | |
ABA | 44.27 de | 43.63 d | 34.18 ef | 34.50 f | 22.80 d | 23.60 cd | 15.18 de |
6-BA | 46.73 a | 46.53 a | 37.99 a | 38.26 a | 25.61 a | 25.75 a | 17.61 a |
DA-6 | 45.58 b | 45.77 b | 37.17 b | 37.26 b | 24.90 ab | 25.22 a | 16.84 ab |
Spd | 44.09 e | 43.44 de | 33.57 f | 33.99 f | 22.30 d | 22.78 d | 14.68 e |
IBA | 43.97 e | 43.60 d | 35.34 d | 35.10 e | 22.83 d | 23.56 cd | 15.35 de |
SA | 42.94 f | 42.68 ef | 36.72 bc | 35.89 d | 22.24 d | 22.64 d | 15.88 cd |
BL | 44.71 cd | 44.78 c | 36.19 c | 37.17 b | 24.20 bc | 24.68 ab | 16.93 ab |
ZT | 44.66 cd | 45.65 b | 37.33 ab | 38.58 a | 24.16 bc | 25.53 a | 17.14 ab |
TRIA | 41.56 f | 42.47 f | 33.99 f | 34.06 f | 20.86 e | 22.52 d | 14.75 e |
MeJA | 42.91 f | 42.69 ef | 31.93 g | 32.65 g | 23.32 cd | 23.05 cd | 14.71 e |
KT | 44.92 c | 45.59 b | 34.90 de | 36.51 c | 24.33 bc | 24.67 ab | 16.63 bc |
CK | 44.23 de | 43.64 d | 33.51 f | 34.51 f | 23.18 cd | 23.89 bc | 15.20 de |
SJ18 | 44.25 b | 44.74 b | 35.42 b | 36.02 b | 23.14 b | 24.50 b | 16.38 b |
KD12 | 42.20 c | 41.55 c | 33.25 c | 33.49 c | 21.08 c | 21.75 c | 14.04 c |
SJ6 | 46.20 a | 46.33 a | 37.04 a | 37.62 a | 24.19 a | 25.72 a | 17.30 a |
显著性分析Significance analysis | |||||||
Y | 0.22ns | 1.42ns | 2.75ns | ||||
P | 66.56** | 46.81** | 32.25** | 94.82** | 12.76** | 12.10** | 15.95** |
V | 619.23** | 195.12** | 369.54** | 407.73** | 157.50** | 263.83** | 133.60** |
P×V | 9.69* | 1.96ns | 6.12** | 5.34* | 1.29ns | 7.22** | 3.34* |
[1] | TILMAN D, BALZER C, HILL J, et al. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(50): 20260-20264. |
[2] | HUANG L, LIU L L, ZHANG T, et al. An interventional study of rice for reducing cadmium exposure in a Chinese industrial town[J]. Environment International, 2019, 122: 301-309. |
[3] | 赵黎明, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 等. 耕作与植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(15): 93-103. |
ZHAO L M, ZHENG D F, FENG N J, et al. Effects of tillage and plant growth regulators on the yield and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality japonica rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(15): 93-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 胡世龙, 程博, 曹凑贵, 等. 不同氮肥水平下喷施木醋液对水稻产量和食味品质的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(1): 133-140. |
HU S L, CHENG B, CAO C G, et al. Effects of spraying wood vinegar on yield and taste quality of rice under different nitrogen levels[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2022, 41(1): 133-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 刘寒, 戴远兴, 吕明芳, 等. 外源水杨酸对水稻苗期生长与防卫相关基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1789-1796. |
LIU H, DAI Y X, LYU M F, et al. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on growth and defense-related genes of rice seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1789-1796. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | ZHANG M C, HE S Y, ZHAN Y C, et al. Exogenous melatonin reduces the inhibitory effect of osmotic stress on photosynthesis in soybean[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(12): e0226542. |
[7] | HUANG G M, LIU Y R, GUO Y L, et al. A novel plant growth regulator improves the grain yield of high-density maize crops by reducing stalk lodging and promoting a compact plant type[J]. Field Crops Research, 2021, 260: 107982. |
[8] | 赵宏伟, 李晓, 贾琰, 等. 水杨酸对孕穗期低温胁迫寒地粳稻颖花形成的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(6): 1-9. |
ZHAO H W, LI X, JIA Y, et al. Effect of salicylic acid on formation of spikelet in japonica rice under low-temperature stress at booting stage[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2019, 50(6): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 练华山, 李欣欣, 林立金, 等. 表油菜素内酯对夏黑葡萄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1889-1896. |
LIAN H S, LI X X, LIN L J, et al. Study on epibrassinolide (EBR) on growth and physiological response of Summer Black grape seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1889-1896. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | SHEHZAD M A, NAWAZ F, AHMAD F, et al. Protective effect of potassium and chitosan supply on growth, physiological processes and antioxidative machinery in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under drought stress[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 187: 109841. |
[11] | GONG L S, QU S J, HUANG G M, et al. Improving maize grain yield by formulating plant growth regulator strategies in North China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(2): 622-632. |
[12] | 丁凯鑫, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对赤豆鼓粒期光合特性及氮代谢的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(12): 2510-2518. |
DING K X, FENG N J, ZHENG D F, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen metabolism of adzuki bean during seed filling stage[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(12): 2510-2518. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | DEHGHAN M, BALOUCHI H, YADAVI A, et al. Improve wheat (Triticum aestivum) performance by brassinolide application under different irrigation regimes[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2020, 130: 259-267. |
[14] | 王娜, 杨思敏, 刘蓓蓓, 等. 植物生长调节剂对绿豆干物质积累动态与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(3): 10-17. |
WANG N, YANG S M, LIU B B, et al. Regulation of plant growth regulator on dry matter accumulation and yield of mung bean[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(3): 10-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | NAZ R, SARFRAZ A, ANWAR Z, et al. Combined ability of salicylic acid and spermidine to mitigate the individual and interactive effects of drought and chromium stress in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 159: 285-300. |
[16] | 吴琼, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对玉米幼苗生长、光合荧光特性及产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(3): 520-528. |
WU Q, ZHENG D F, FENG N J, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on maize seedling growth, photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics and yield[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(3): 520-528. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 杨雪, 彭静, 张明明, 等. 叶面喷施6-BA对玉米生殖期碳水化合物转运和分配的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(7): 62-70. |
YANG X, PENG J, ZHANG M M, et al. Effects of foliar spraying of 6-BA on carbohydrate transfer and allocation of maize at the reproductive stage[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(7): 62-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 罗凯, 谢琛, 汪锦, 等. 外源喷施植物生长调节剂对套作大豆碳氮代谢和花荚脱落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 752-760. |
LUO K, XIE C, WANG J, et al. Effect of exogenous plant growth regulators on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and flower-pod abscission of relay strip intercropping soybean[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 752-760. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 孔祥, 张鑫, 黄翠, 等. 外源亚精胺对水分亏缺下冬小麦小花发育及结实特性的调控效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(S1): 49-58. |
KONG X, ZHANG X, HUANG C, et al. Effects of exogenous spermidine on floret development and grain setting characteristics of winter wheat under water deficit[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(S1): 49-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 郑甲成, 詹兰兰, 刘婷, 等. 有机肥和茉莉酸甲酯配施对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(3): 519-525. |
ZHENG J C, ZHAN L L, LIU T, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer and methyl jasmonate on the yield and quality of rice[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2020, 35(3): 519-525. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 成臣, 雷凯, 程慧煌, 等. 苗期不同浓度多效唑对南方晚粳稻秧苗素质、茎蘖动态及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(2): 150-158. |
CHENG C, LEI K, CHENG H H, et al. Effects of different concentrations of paclobutrazol in seedling stage on seedling quality, tillering dynamics and grain yield of japonica rice during late cropping season in southern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 150-158. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 郑春风, 刘春增, 任伟, 等. 不同时期叶面喷施多效唑对紫云英结实性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(1): 172-178. |
ZHENG C F, LIU C Z, REN W, et al. Effects of spraying stages of paclobutrazol on seed setting characteristics of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.)[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(1): 172-178. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 王英杰, 唐才宝, 潘素君, 等. 外源6-BA和BR对不同灌溉方式下水稻光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(20): 6930-6938. |
WANG Y J, TANG C B, PAN S J, et al. Effects of 6-BA and BR on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice under different irrigation methods[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(20): 6930-6938. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 王文玉, 郑桂萍, 万思宇, 等. 15%调环酸钙对水稻产量与品质的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2019, 36(3): 11-17. |
WANG W Y, ZHENG G P, WAN S Y, et al. Effects of 15% prohexadione calcium on rice yield and quality[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2019, 36(3): 11-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 吴进东, 丁广礼, 朱旺生, 等. 氮肥后移与花后叶面喷施6-BA对冬小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28(2): 343-349. |
WU J D, DING G L, ZHU W S, et al. Effects of postponing nitrogen application and spraying foliar 6-BA after anthesis on grain yield and quality of winter wheat[J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica, 2014, 28(2): 343-349. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 金茜, 杨发荣, 黄杰, 等. 花期喷施外源ABA对藜麦生产性状以及籽实品质的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(5): 1643-1650. |
JIN Q, YANG F R, HUANG J, et al. Effects of exogenous ABA spraying at flowering stage on production characters and seed quality of quinoa[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(5): 1643-1650. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 冯彩军, 宋瑞娇, 宋凌宇, 等. 2, 4-表芸苔素内酯浸种对干旱胁迫下大麦种子萌发期淀粉代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2112-2120. |
FENG C J, SONG R J, SONG L Y, et al. Effects of soaking seeds with 2, 4-epbrassinolide on starch netabolism during germination of barley seeds under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2112-2120. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 赵海亮, 左璐, 张璐, 等. 低温胁迫下外源褪黑素对番茄幼苗光抑制的缓解效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 151-159. |
ZHAO H L, ZUO L, ZHANG L, et al. Mitigation of exogenous melatonin on photoinhibition of tomato seedlings under chilling stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 151-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 丁东霞, 李能慧, 李静, 等. 外源褪黑素对低温弱光胁迫下辣椒叶绿素荧光和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 1935-1944. |
DING D X, LI N H, LI J, et al. Effects of exogenous melatonin on chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant system of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under low temperature and low light stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 1935-1944. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 魏茜雅, 梁腊梅, 林欣琪, 等. 褪黑素种子引发处理对干旱胁迫下朝天椒生长与生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10): 2378-2388. |
WEI X Y, LIANG L M, LIN X Q, et al. Effects of melatonin seed priming on growth and physiological characteristics of Capsicum annuum under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(10): 2378-2388. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 李刘龙, 卫茗梅, 李秀, 等. 外源6-BA对不同时期遮光下江汉平原稻茬小麦产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3753-3761. |
LI L L, WEI M M, LI X, et al. Effects of exogenous 6-BA on the yield of wheat after rice in the Jianghan Plain under diffe-rent shading treatments[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(11): 3753-3761. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 郝青南, 汪嫒嫒, 龙泽福, 等. DA-6对南方大豆品种性状、产量和品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2021, 40(6): 799-804. |
HAO Q N, WANG A A, LONG Z F, et al. Effects of DA-6 on the characteristics, yield and quality of soybean varieties in South China[J]. Soybean Science, 2021, 40(6): 799-804. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 罗晓峰, 代宇佳, 宋艳, 等. 三种植物生长调节剂对大豆生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(4): 980-988. |
LUO X F, DAI Y J, SONG Y, et al. Effects of three plant growth regulators on growth and yield of soybean[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(4): 980-988. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 张振, 赵俊晔, 石玉, 等. 不同播幅对小麦花后叶片光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 981-990. |
ZHANG Z, ZHAO J Y, SHI Y, et al. Effects of different sowing space on photosynthetic characteristics after anthesis and grain yield of wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 981-990. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | HUANG M, JIANG L G, XIA B, et al. Yield gap analysis of super hybrid rice between two subtropical environments[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2013, 7(5): 600-608. |
[36] | LYNCH J P, DOYLE D, MCAULEY S, et al. The impact of variation in grain number and individual grain weight on winter wheat yield in the high yield potential environment of Ireland[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 87: 40-49. |
[37] | 顾俊荣, 董明辉, 杨代凤, 等. 一种新型水稻生长调节剂对超级稻籽粒结实与品质特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 8-13. |
GU J R, DONG M H, YANG D F, et al. Effects of A kind of new-type rice growth regulator on grain setting traits and quality of super rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(12): 8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | ZHENG C F, ZHU Y J, ZHU H J, et al. Floret development and grain setting characteristics in winter wheat in response to pre-anthesis applications of 6-benzylaminopurine and boron[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 169: 70-76. |
[39] | 郑光耀, 闫林林, 王成章, 等. 施用冷杉针叶三萜酸对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(1): 78-80. |
ZHENG G Y, YAN L L, WANG C Z, et al. Effects of spraying triterpene acids from fir needles on yield and quality of rice[J]. China Rice, 2017, 23(1): 78-80. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 凌启鸿. 作物群体质量[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2000. |
[41] | 宋佳琦, 王玉祥, 张博. 外源6-BA对紫花苜蓿盛花期叶片光合、生理特性及结荚率的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3): 720-728. |
SONG J Q, WANG Y X, ZHANG B. Effects of exogenous 6-BA on photosynthesis, physiological characteristics of alfalfa leaves at flowering stage and rate of podding[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 720-728. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | RASHEED R, YASMEEN H, HUSSAIN I, et al. Exogenously applied 5-aminolevulinic acid modulates growth, secondary metabolism and oxidative defense in sunflower under water deficit stress[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2020, 26(3): 489-499. |
[43] | 李志宏, 刘宏斌, 张云贵. 叶绿素仪在氮肥推荐中的应用研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(1): 125-132. |
LI Z H, LIU H B, ZHANG Y G. A review on chlorophyll meter application on nitrogen fertilizer recommendation[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006, 12(1): 125-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[44] | LIU C J, FENG N J, ZHENG D F, et al. Uniconazole and diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate increase soybean pod setting and yield by regulating sucrose and starch content[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(2): 748-758. |
[1] | 高虎, 穆晓国, 李海俊, 高富成, 张莹, 李建设, 叶林. 粉垄耕作对坝地土壤特性及甘蓝产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123. |
[2] | 陈俊霖, 蒋娜, 刘鑫, 卓红, 田昌, 韩永亮, 张玉平, 荣湘民. 控释氮肥减量对作物产量、氮素吸收与径流损失的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 846-858. |
[3] | 汪颖, 王尖, 冯子珊, 汪宝根, 吴新义, 鲁忠富, 孙玉燕, 董文其, 李国景, 吴晓花. 瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 334-343. |
[4] | 罗莎莎, 王如月, 甄紫怡, 吴嘉龙, 徐业勇, 巴合提牙儿·克热木, 孙雅丽, 虎海防. 灌溉时间和灌溉量对杏李裂果率与果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 365-372. |
[5] | 张玥, 陈慧, 郑雅丹, 杨鹏, 柯志刚, 戴央章, 金友定, 丁玉庭, 刘书来. 贻贝糟制过程中的品质变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 416-423. |
[6] | 刘智成, 严良文, 陈瑶瑶, 欧雪婷. 福建地区不同栽培模式下百香果的产量与品质特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 134-147. |
[7] | 宗自豪, 何丁生, 牛犇, 黄俊, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 不同镂空包装对雨天采收杨梅贮运品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 196-204. |
[8] | 岳宗伟, 李嘉骁, 孙向阳, 刘国梁, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 查贵超, 魏宁娴. 化肥有机肥配施对土壤性质、樱桃果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201. |
[9] | 张博, 刘泽慈, 汪洁, 李兆壮, 李录山, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 不同农业废弃物肥料化配方对露地甘蓝生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792. |
[10] | 张宁, 陶荣浩, 刘佩诗, 胡含秀, 高琳琳, 郭龙, 祝尊友, 马友华. 不同种类有机肥配施化肥对茶叶生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852. |
[11] | 陆兰菲, 赵学平, 马正, 方楠, 骆玉琴, 王晓梅, 叶会, 雷圆, 王强, 张昌朋. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱-质谱联用法测定铁皮石斛中2,4-表芸苔素内酯残留[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1896-1903. |
[12] | 王迪, 杨汉梅, 李阳倩, 贾梦婷, 邹亮, 杨帆. 苦荞麦“品、质、效、用”的多维评价及其活性成分高值化利用的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974. |
[13] | 田玉刚, 万素梅, 林皎, 陈国栋, 李浩, 胡宇凯, 李燕芳, 胡守林, 毛廷勇, 赵书珍. 不同地膜类型与灌溉量对棉花光合参数和产量、品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1523-1531. |
[14] | 雷联. 膜下滴灌调亏对制种玉米植株生长、产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1542-1549. |
[15] | 卜远鹏, 刘娜, 张古文, 冯志娟, 王斌, 龚亚明, 许林英. 菜用大豆种质资源的农艺性状多样性评价及核心种质与食味品质评价体系的构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1307-1314. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 682
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 294
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||