叶面营养对杨梅果实品质及采后贮藏的影响

浙江农业学报

叶面营养对杨梅果实品质及采后贮藏的影响

（1浙江省亚热带作物研究所，浙江温州 325005；2浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所，浙江杭州 310021）

出版日期:2014-11-25 发布日期:2014-12-02

Effects of foliar nutrition on fruit quality and postharvest storage of Chinese bayberry

（1 Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops， Wenzhou 325005， China;2 Institute of Horticulture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences， Hangzhou 310021， China）

Online:2014-11-25 Published:2014-12-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以丁岙杨梅为试材，研究叶面肥对杨梅果实品质及采后贮藏的影响。结果表明，喷施叶面肥可显著提高杨梅果实品质，爱农氨基酸处理效果最佳，果实固形物、总糖含量平均比对照提高130、152个百分点，总酸含量平均比对照降低022个百分点，糖酸比、固酸比明显提高，其次为美钙镁和翠康钙宝。喷施叶面肥可显著降低果实失水率、烂果率，其中美钙镁、翠康钙宝处理失水率分别比对照降低507和407个百分点，烂果率分别比对照减少784和790个百分点。喷施叶面肥还可延缓杨梅品质变化，降低果实POD活性及变化幅度，其中翠康钙宝处理果实的品质下降幅度和POD活性变化幅度最小。

关键词: 杨梅, 叶面营养, 品质, 采后贮藏

Abstract: The fruit quality and postharvest storage characteristics in ‘Dingao Chinese bayberry （Myrica rubra Sieb.& Zucc.） treated with foliar nutrition were investigated in this study. The results showed that treatment of foliar nutrition significantly increased fruit quality of Chinese bayberry， and the effect of Ainong amino acid on Chinese bayberry fruit quality was the best. The fruit soluble solids and total sugar contents, increased by 130% and 152%, respectively， while total acid content was 022% lower than the control group. In addition， the sugar acid ratio and soluble solid content to titration acid ratio were significantly increased compared with the control. The effects of Meigaimei and Cuikanggaibao were lower than Ainong amino acid. In addition， treatment of foliar nutrition significantly reduced fruit water loss rate and rotting\|pod rate. Among them， effects of Meigaimei on water loss rate and rotting\|pod rate were reduced by 507% and 784% compared with the control， respectively， while the effects of Cuikanggaibao on water loss rate and rotting\|pod rate were reduced 407% and 790% compared with the control, respectively. The results also showed that fruit quality changes were slowed down and POD activities were reduced after foliar nutrition treatment， and Cuikanggaibao showed the best effect.

Key words: Chinese bayberry, foliar nutrition, fruit quality, postharvest storage

陈巍1，梁森苗2，郭秀珠1，黄品湖1，求盈盈2，戚行江2，*. 叶面营养对杨梅果实品质及采后贮藏的影响 [J]. 浙江农业学报.

[1]	温明霞, 张顺昌, 吴韶辉, 胡丽鹏, 王鹏, 黄贝. 蛋白水解氨基酸肥料对红美人杂柑果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 422-428.
[2]	田培, 赵慧宇, 刘之炜, 王娇, 狄珊珊, 徐浩, 汪志威, 王新全, 齐沛沛. 杨梅中灭蝇胺及其代谢物检测方法与风险评估[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 534-540.
[3]	陈丹, 汤翠凤, 董超, 甘树仙, 李俊, 阿新祥, 张斐斐, 杨雅云, 牛赛赛, 戴陆园. 云南软米地方品种籽粒淀粉品质特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 203-214.
[4]	李甜竹, 孙玉文, 汪季涛, 甘德芳, 胡克玲. 不同贮藏温度对糙皮侧耳采后品质及木质素积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 248-258.
[5]	崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 向江, 李明山, 吴江, . 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 52-61.
[6]	廖朝美, 游敏芳, 谭光辉, 李杰章, 张依裕, 覃媛钰, 刘若余. 三穗鸭PRKCB基因内含子14的变异对蛋壳品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1574-1580.
[7]	李金武, 郁继华, 吕剑, 冯致, 杨海兴, 车旭升, 秦启杰, 张洋, 金宁. 不同覆盖方式对高原夏季露地松花菜产量、品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[8]	喻宗岗, 蒋隽, 姚亚铃, 郭英, 李闯, 燕海峰. 雪峰乌骨鸡HSP70基因多态性与精液品质关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1378-1384.
[9]	王同林, 叶红霞, 郑积荣, 李明. 番茄果实中主要风味物质研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1513-1522.
[10]	顾赛麒, 王苏宁, 鲍嵘斌, 胡彬超, 杨晓霞, 张继磊, 陈景滢, 林招永, 丁玉庭, 柯志刚. 食品改良剂对丁香鱼干品质特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1263-1273.
[11]	韩立杰, 董伟欣, 张月辰. 不同水肥处理对小麦冠层结构、产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 953-962.
[12]	邓倩, 王羊, 邓群仙, 辛亚宁, 李雷, 龙星雨, 祝进, 张慧芬, 夏惠, 梁东. 蜀脆枣果实发育规律及品质积累特性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 644-652.
[13]	王长进, 徐运林, 程昕昕, 周毅, 余海兵. 甜玉米种子营养品质主要性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 383-389.
[14]	柯福艳, 徐知渊, 占金荣. 农产品质量安全消费者满意评价影响因素分析——来自浙江的调查[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 2271-2281.
[15]	马小华, 俞浙萍, 郑锡良, 胡晓金, 张淑文, 戚行江, 马靖艳. 靖州杨梅引种试验与表型聚类分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 1987-1993.