浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1256-1263.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.07.11
收稿日期:
2020-07-16
出版日期:
2021-07-25
发布日期:
2021-08-06
通讯作者:
龚榜初
作者简介:
*龚榜初,E-mail: gongbc@126.com基金资助:
WU Kaiyun(), GONG Bangchu*(
), XU Yang, ZHANG Pingsheng
Received:
2020-07-16
Online:
2021-07-25
Published:
2021-08-06
Contact:
GONG Bangchu
摘要:
从幼化的砧木采穗圃采集亚林6号插穗,进行硬枝扦插生根试验。利用植物生长调节IBA、ABT1、NAA、GGR6、IAA剂配制的不同浓度溶液及作为对照的清水浸泡插条切口,而后扦插于无菌基质。遮阴拱膜保湿环境下抚育45 d及露天滴灌环境下抚育15 d后,对生根效果进行取样检测、差异显著性分析和多重比较分析。结果表明,不同处理之间扦插生根效果差异显著,IAA、IBA、GGR6等在合适配比下有较高的生根率和萌梢生长量。其中处理A1、G3、G2生根率分别达到75.6%、56.9%和52.8%,均显著高于其他处理;生根率和愈伤发生率的规律不一致;生根类型有皮部生根、愈伤生根、混合生根3种类型;实验中扦插生根以皮部生根为主,混合生根为辅;IAA等处理有利于提高皮部生根发生,NAA、添加腐植酸的IBA等处理有利于促进愈伤组织生根。IAA 250 mg·L-1溶液处理的扦插生根效果最好,GGR6 500 mg·L-1扦插生根效果次之。综合成本优势和操作方便性,建议生产中使用GGR6 500 mg·L-1处理培育柿砧木扦插苗。
中图分类号:
吴开云, 龚榜初, 徐阳, 章平生. 不同植物生长调节剂对柿砧亚林6号硬枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1256-1263.
WU Kaiyun, GONG Bangchu, XU Yang, ZHANG Pingsheng. Effects of different plant growth regulators on hardwood cuttage of persimmon rootstock Yalin 6[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1256-1263.
处理 Treatment | 试剂 Agentia | 浓度 Concentration/(mg·L-1) | 处理 Treatment | 试剂 Agentia | 浓度 Concentration/(mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | IAA | 250 | H1 | IBA/腐植酸Humic acid | 150/100 |
A2 | IAA | 500 | H2 | IBA/腐植酸Humic acid | 300/200 |
A3 | IAA | 1 000 | N1 | NAA | 125 |
B1 | IBA | 150 | N2 | NAA | 250 |
B2 | IBA | 300 | N3 | NAA | 500 |
B3 | IBA | 600 | T1 | ABT1 | 250 |
G1 | GGR6 | 250 | T2 | ABT1 | 500 |
G2 | GGR6 | 500 | T3 | ABT1 | 1 000 |
G3 | GGR6 | 1 000 | CK | 纯净水Pure water | 0 |
表1 柿子砧木扦插试验中不同处理植物生长调节剂浓度
Table 1 Plant growth regulators concentration in cuttage propagation of persimmon
处理 Treatment | 试剂 Agentia | 浓度 Concentration/(mg·L-1) | 处理 Treatment | 试剂 Agentia | 浓度 Concentration/(mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | IAA | 250 | H1 | IBA/腐植酸Humic acid | 150/100 |
A2 | IAA | 500 | H2 | IBA/腐植酸Humic acid | 300/200 |
A3 | IAA | 1 000 | N1 | NAA | 125 |
B1 | IBA | 150 | N2 | NAA | 250 |
B2 | IBA | 300 | N3 | NAA | 500 |
B3 | IBA | 600 | T1 | ABT1 | 250 |
G1 | GGR6 | 250 | T2 | ABT1 | 500 |
G2 | GGR6 | 500 | T3 | ABT1 | 1 000 |
G3 | GGR6 | 1 000 | CK | 纯净水Pure water | 0 |
图1 不同植物生长调节剂处理对甜柿生根率、成活率、愈伤发生率的影响 不同处理间没有相同字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。
Fig.1 Effects of different plant growth regulators on rooting rate, survival rate, callus formation rate of persimmon The bars without the same letters indicated the significant difference(P<0.05). The same as below.
指标 Index | 根系干重 Weight of dried root | 根系发生数量 Number of root | 新梢粗度 Diameter of shoot | 新梢高度 Length of shoot | 根系长度 Length of rooting | 成活率 Survival rate | 生根率 Rooting rate | 愈伤发生率 Callus formation rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系干重根系干重 | 1 | |||||||
Weight of dried root | ||||||||
根系发生数量Number of root | 0.815** | 1 | ||||||
新梢粗度Diameter of shoot | 0.664** | 0.764** | 1 | |||||
新梢高度Length of shoot | 0.637** | 0.748** | 0.957** | 1 | ||||
根系长度Length of rooting | 0.728** | 0.837** | 0.875** | 0.926** | 1 | |||
成活率Survival rate | 0.686** | 0.782** | 0.974** | 0.942** | 0.861** | 1 | ||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.751** | 0.893** | 0.938** | 0.931** | 0.928** | 0.962** | 1 | |
愈伤发生率Callus formation rate | 0.343** | 0.491** | 0.406** | 0.395** | 0.427** | 0.342** | 0.365** | 1 |
表2 观察指标之间的相关性分析
Table 2 Correlation between each index
指标 Index | 根系干重 Weight of dried root | 根系发生数量 Number of root | 新梢粗度 Diameter of shoot | 新梢高度 Length of shoot | 根系长度 Length of rooting | 成活率 Survival rate | 生根率 Rooting rate | 愈伤发生率 Callus formation rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系干重根系干重 | 1 | |||||||
Weight of dried root | ||||||||
根系发生数量Number of root | 0.815** | 1 | ||||||
新梢粗度Diameter of shoot | 0.664** | 0.764** | 1 | |||||
新梢高度Length of shoot | 0.637** | 0.748** | 0.957** | 1 | ||||
根系长度Length of rooting | 0.728** | 0.837** | 0.875** | 0.926** | 1 | |||
成活率Survival rate | 0.686** | 0.782** | 0.974** | 0.942** | 0.861** | 1 | ||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.751** | 0.893** | 0.938** | 0.931** | 0.928** | 0.962** | 1 | |
愈伤发生率Callus formation rate | 0.343** | 0.491** | 0.406** | 0.395** | 0.427** | 0.342** | 0.365** | 1 |
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
不同处理Different treatments | 26 850.096 | 17 | 1 579.417** | 27.982 | 0 |
生长调节剂Kinds of plant growth regulator | 3 208.319 | 6 | 534.720** | 9.473 | 0 |
生长调节剂浓度梯度Concentration of plant growth regulator | 5 321.076 | 6 | 886.846** | 15.712 | 0 |
误差Error | 6 095.980 | 234 | 56.444 |
表3 扦插试验生根效果的方差分析
Table 3 Variance analysis of the cuttage test results
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
不同处理Different treatments | 26 850.096 | 17 | 1 579.417** | 27.982 | 0 |
生长调节剂Kinds of plant growth regulator | 3 208.319 | 6 | 534.720** | 9.473 | 0 |
生长调节剂浓度梯度Concentration of plant growth regulator | 5 321.076 | 6 | 886.846** | 15.712 | 0 |
误差Error | 6 095.980 | 234 | 56.444 |
[1] | 裴忺, 张青林, 郭大勇, 等. 完全甜柿遗传改良研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(2):313-321. |
PEI X, ZHANG Q L, GUO D Y, et al. Development of genetic improvement in Chinese PCNA persimmon[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 32(2):313-321.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 罗正荣, 张青林, 徐莉清, 等. 新中国果树科学研究70年: 柿[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(10):1382-1388. |
LUO Z R, ZHANG Q L, XU L Q, et al. Fruit scientific research in New China in the past 70 years: Persimmon[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(10):1382-1388.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 徐君驰, 干建平, 项俊, 等. 中国甜柿遗传改良技术体系研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(5):987-998. |
XU J C, GAN J P, XIANG J, et al. Advance of genetic improvement technology for Chinese PCNA persimmon[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(5):987-998.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 王元裕, 李伯均, 周碧英, 等. 甜柿砧穗组合嫁接亲和力研究[J]. 园艺学报, 1996, 23(2):110-114. |
WANG Y Y, LI B J, ZHOU B Y, et al. The graft compatibility of different rootstock-scion combinations of sweet persimmons[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1996, 23(2):110-114.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 汤丹, 龚榜初, 江锡兵, 等. 不同甜柿砧穗组合根系差异性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(1):85-92. |
TANG D, GONG B C, JIANG X B, et al. Effects of different scions on rootstock root system in persimmon[J]. Forest Research, 2016, 29(1):85-92.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 高焕章, 鲍新梅, 艾天成. 柿树硬枝扦插试验初报[J]. 湖北农学院学报, 2001(1):16-17. |
GAO H Z, BAO X M, AI T C. Study on stiff stem cuttage of persimmon[J]. Journal of Hubei Agricultural College, 2001(1):16-17.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] |
TETSUMURA T, TAO R, SUGIURA A. Some factors affecting the rooting of softwood cuttings of Japanese persimmon[J]. Engei Gakkai Zasshi, 2001, 70(3):275-280.
DOI URL |
[8] | 龚榜初, 王劲风. 日本科柿砧木类型选择的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1992, 5(6):706-711. |
GONG B C, WANG J F. Studies on the selection of combination of root stocks with scions of non-astringent persimmon (Diospyros) varieties[J]. Forest Research, 1992, 5(6):706-711.(in Chinese) | |
[9] | 汤丹, 江锡兵, 龚榜初, 等. ‘富有’甜柿中间砧的早期筛选和嫁接亲和性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5):54-62. |
TANG D, JIANG X B, GONG B C, et al. Early selection of interstocks for improving grafting compatibility in Diospyros kaki ‘Fuyu’[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(5):54-62.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 唐强, 李志辉, 吴际友, 等. 毛红椿无性系扦插繁殖试验研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(1):67-70. |
TANG Q, LI Z H, WU J Y, et al. Test on clonal cutting propagation of Toona ciliata var. pubesens[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015, 35(1):67-70.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 曹兴, 张秀省, 高祥斌, 等. ABT1号生根粉对聊红槐硬枝扦插的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2009, 36(2):278-281. |
CAO X, ZHANG X S, GAO X B, et al. Effect of ABT1 on hardwood-cutting rooting of Sophora japonica ‘Liaohong’[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2009, 36(2):278-281.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 张鹏, 张宇, 何梦雅. 黄榆硬枝扦插繁殖技术[J]. 经济林研究, 2014, 32(2):144-147. |
ZHANG P, ZHANG Y, HE M Y. Propagation techniques of hardwood cutting in Ulmus macrocarpa[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2014, 32(2):144-147.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 胡安鸿, 宋彬, 朱亚丽, 等. 不同浓度GGR生根粉对沙棘硬枝扦插成活率的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2017, 23(1):95-98. |
HU A H, SONG B, ZHU Y L, et al. Effects of different concentrations of GGR abt on survival rate of seabuckthorn hard branch by cutting[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 23(1):95-98.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 韩艳英, 叶彦辉, 魏丽萍, 等. 不同质量浓度吲哚乙酸对杨树硬枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(3):81-84. |
HAN Y Y, YE Y H, WEI L P, et al. Effect of different concentrations of IBA on rooting capacity of hardwood cuttings of Populus spp[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012, 32(3):81-84.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 李柠, 曹福亮, 李强, 等. 枫杨硬枝扦插生根的研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(10):1-8. |
LI N, CAO F L, LI Q, et al. Study on root rooting of hard branch cutting of Pterocaryastenoptera C. DC[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(10):1-8.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 姜宗庆, 李成忠, 余乐, 等. 外源IBA对薄壳山核桃嫩枝扦插及其生根过程中相关酶活性的调控效应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(7):152-154. |
JIANG Z Q, LI C Z, YU L, et al. Regulating effects of exogenous IBA on stem cutting and activity of related enzymes during rooting of Carya illinoensis[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(7):152-154.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 李阳, 严芳, 何卫中, 等. 不同生根剂对惠明白茶苗扦插的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(6):988-991. |
LI Y, YAN F, HE W Z, et al. Effect of different rooting agents on cutting propagation of Huiming baicha[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2012, 24(6):988-991.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] |
ROUT G R. Effect of auxins on adventitious root development from single node cuttings of Camellia sinensis(L.) kuntze and associated biochemical changes[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2006, 48(2):111-117.
DOI URL |
[19] | 王宏信, 李向林, 王楠, 等. ABT1处理对降香黄檀硬枝扦插生根及其关联酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(8):138-141. |
WANG H X, LI X L, WANG N, et al. Effect of ABT1 treatment on rooting and related enzyme activity of hardwood cutting of Dalbergia odorifera[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(8):138-141.(in Chinese) | |
[20] | 尹丹丹, 薛泽云, 徐迎春, 等. 外源NO及GGR6对五种石蒜属植物子球发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(6):992-997. |
YIN D D, XUE Z Y, XU Y C, et al. Effect of exogenous nitric oxide and GGR6 on cormel development of several plants of Lycoris[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2012, 24(6):992-997.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 向江, 李明山, 吴江, . 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 52-61. |
[2] | 黄科文, 李克强, 刘继, 岁立云, 刘磊, 王铤, 郑阳霞, 林立金, 廖明安. 不同砧穗组合对豆瓣菜扦插苗生理特性及硒积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 447-454. |
[3] | 曹玥华, 魏灵珠, 沈碧薇, 程建徽, 向江, 吴江. 砧木对新郁葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(6): 908-914. |
[4] | 丁小雪, 汪炳良, 海睿, 胡雨晴, 米月华, 叶红霞. 不同来源托鲁巴姆种子的发芽特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 420-427. |
[5] | 杨舟, 吕可, 吕珊, 王俊杰, 张荻. 百子莲2个ARF基因与2个Aux/IAA基因的全长克隆与序列分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(1): 86-97. |
[6] | 江林娟, 邹雪, 黄雪丽, 倪苏, 李立芹, 杨世民. 响应面法优化马铃薯茎段高效再生体系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(6): 918-925. |
[7] | 洪森荣, 宁本松, 叶思雨, 刘燕, 张铭心, 占学林. 黄独胚性愈伤组织冻后黑暗培养及其再生植株半薄切片观察[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 65-70. |
[8] | 戚甫友, 范伟军, 胡秀, 梁韩枝, 吴永清, 许炳强. 土党参茎段的愈伤组织诱导与植株再生[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1313-1320. |
[9] | 董然然, 陈瑞丹. 不同扦插日期美人梅嫩枝扦插生根特性及生理生化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 1522-1529. |
[10] | 刘新华1,2,曹春信1,刘林1,朱璞1,周秦1,江海东2,*. 不同砧木对嫁接西瓜生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(6): 966-. |
[11] | 郝婷*,丁小涛*,余纪柱**,张红梅,金海军. 丝瓜作砧木对黄瓜幼苗耐热性的影响 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(3): 365-. |
[12] | 马佩勇,贾赵东,边小峰,郭小丁,谢一芝*. 不同砧木与嫁接方式对甘薯开花结实的影响 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(6): 1425-. |
[13] | 王雪萍;龚自明*;高士伟;郑鹏程;叶飞;滕靖. 不同基质对茶树穴盘扦插繁育的影响[J]. , 2014, 26(2): 0-348350. |
[14] | 马常念;*;张慧琴;*;肖金平;张琛;石志军;谢鸣;**. 三种桃砧木茎尖培养技术的研究[J]. , 2013, 25(3): 0-508. |
[15] | 魏灵珠;程建徽;李琳;梅军霞;吴江*. 两种多抗性砧木对大紫王葡萄生长与果实品质的影响[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-67. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||