粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.09.20

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 1759-1769.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.09.20

粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究

崔宁波(), 生世玉

东北农业大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150030

收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-09
作者简介:崔宁波(1980—),女,黑龙江依安人,博士,教授,主要从事农业经济理论与政策研究。E-mail: 82890000@163.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金(20BJY149)

Quantitative research on ecological compensation for cultivated land in black soil region in northeast China from perspective of food security

CUI Ningbo(), SHENG Shiyu

School of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Received:2021-01-11 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从粮食安全视角出发,在理论分析的基础上,运用基于碳足迹和产量因子修正的生态足迹模型,结合生态服务价值,量化2011—2018年东北黑土区部分城市的耕地生态补偿标准和迫切程度。结果发现:在粮食安全视角下,研究区均为耕地生态盈余区,约有54.1%的耕地生态承载的粮食产量供给到了耕地生态赤字区。受耕地生态盈余面积、单位耕地生态服务非市场价值和支付能力影响,研究区内各市的耕地生态补偿标准总量在研究期初有所提高,但随后均出现明显降低趋势,2018年的耕地生态补偿标准分别为哈尔滨市19.50亿元、绥化市23.60亿元、大庆市10.95亿元、长春市13.05亿元、四平市25.95亿元、铁岭市9.19亿元。考虑各市的经济发展水平,应当率先向四平市、绥化市支付耕地生态补偿。

关键词: 粮食安全, 生态足迹, 补偿标准, 东北黑土区

Abstract:

Black soil resources are the cornerstone of the comprehensive grain production capacity in northeast China. From the perspective of food security, on the basis of theoretical analysis, the ecological footprint model based on carbon footprint and yield factor correction was adopted, combined with the ecosystem service value, to quantify the ecological compensation standard of cultivated land and the urgency of some cities in black soil region in northeast China from 2011 to 2018. It is shown that the study area is the ecological surplus area of the cultivated land under food security, and 54.1% of the grain output carried by cultivated land is supplied to the ecological deficit areas in China. The compensation standards in 2018 should be Harbin 1.95 billion yuan, Suihua 2.36 billion yuan, Daqing 1.095 billion yuan, Changchun 1.305 billion yuan, Siping 2.595 billion yuan, Tieling 919 million yuan. By considering the economic development level of each city, Siping City and Suihua City have the highest priority in ecological compensation.

Key words: food security, ecological footprint, compensation standard, black soil region in northeast China

中图分类号:

F323.21

崔宁波, 生世玉. 粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1759-1769.

CUI Ningbo, SHENG Shiyu. Quantitative research on ecological compensation for cultivated land in black soil region in northeast China from perspective of food security[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1759-1769.

图/表 7

参考文献 29

[1]	陈红, 关博, 孙文娇. 我国粮食主产区不同环境规制下农业生产效率研究[J]. 商业研究, 2017(3):167-174.
	CHEN H, GUAN B, SUN W J. Research on agricultural production efficiency under different environmental regulations in major grain producing areas in China[J]. Commercial Research, 2017(3):167-174.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	LENZEN M, MURRAY S A. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37(2):229-255. DOI URL
[3]	宋敏, 金贵. 规划管制背景下差别化耕地保护生态补偿研究: 回顾与展望[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019, 40(12):77-85.
	SONG M, JIN G. Differentiated eco-compensation for cultivated land protection in the context of planning regulation: retrospect and prospect[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019, 40(12):77-85.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	WUNDER S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts[R]. Jawa Barat, Indonesia:Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 2005.
[5]	MURADIAN R, CORBERA E, PASCUAL U, et al. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(6):1202-1208. DOI URL
[6]	THUTHUY P, CAMPBELL B M, GARNETT S. Lessons for pro-poor payments for environmental services: an analysis of projects in Vietnam[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2009, 31(2):117-133. DOI URL
[7]	KOSOY N, MARTINEZ-TUNA M, MURADIAN R, et al. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2/3):446-455. DOI URL
[8]	马爱慧, 蔡银莺, 张安录. 基于土地优化配置模型的耕地生态补偿框架[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(10):97-102.
	MA A H, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. Eco-compensation of cultivated land and accounting framework based on the optimal allocation model of land[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(10):97-102.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1):3-15. DOI URL
[10]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5):911-919.
	XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5):911-919.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	苏浩, 雷国平, 李荣印. 基于生态系统服务价值和能值生态足迹的河南省耕地生态补偿研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2014, 48(6):765-769.
	SU H, LEI G P, LI R Y. Research on ecological compensation of plowland of Henan Province based on the value of ecosystem services and emergetic ecological footprint model[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2014, 48(6):765-769.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	白玮, 邱爱军, 张秋平, 等. 黄淮海地区水土资源粮食安全价值核算[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(1):66-70.
	BAI W, QIU A J, ZHANG Q P, et al. Grain security value estimation of land and water resources in Huang-Huai-Hai region[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(1):66-70.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	柯新利, 孟芬, 马才学. 基于粮食安全与经济发展区域差异的土地资源优化配置: 以武汉城市圈为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(8):1572-1578.
	KE X L, MENG F, MA C X. Optimizing land resource allocation based on food security and regional difference in economic development: a case study in Wuhan metropolitan[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(8):1572-1578.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	赵青, 许皞, 郭年冬. 粮食安全视角下的环京津地区耕地生态补偿量化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(7):1052-1059.
	ZHAO Q, XU H, GUO N D. Quantitative study on cultivated land ecological compensation in the area around Beijing and Tianjin from the perspective of grain security[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(7):1052-1059.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	刘利花, 刘向华, 杨洁. 粮食安全视角下的耕地生态补偿标准研究[J]. 学习与实践, 2020(8):38-47.
	LIU L H, LIU X H, YANG J. Research on cultivated land ecological compensation standards from the perspective of food security[J]. Study and Practice, 2020(8):38-47.(in Chinese)
[16]	孟凡杰, 于晓芳, 高聚林, 等. 黑土地保护性耕作发展的制约瓶颈和突破路径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(2):135-142.
	MENG F J, YU X F, GAO J L, et al. The bottleneck and breakthrough path of the conservation tillage development in black soil of northeast China[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, 41(2):135-142.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	韩晓增, 邹文秀. 我国东北黑土地保护与肥力提升的成效与建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):206-212.
	HAN X Z, ZOU W X. Effects and suggestions of black soil protection and soil fertility increase in northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(2):206-212.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	朱红波. 论粮食安全与耕地资源安全[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2006, 27(3):161-164.
	ZHU H B. On food security and cultivated land resource security[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2006, 27(3):161-164.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	刘利花, 杨永福, 李全新. 基于粮食安全的耕地保护补偿研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(1):30-38.
	LIU L H, YANG Y F, LI Q X. Research on compensation of arable land protection based on food security[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 17(1):30-38.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	GREINER R, STANLEY O. More than money for conservation: exploring social co-benefits from PES schemes[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31:4-10. DOI URL
[21]	赵玉明, 程立平, 李加加, 等. 东北典型黑土区的土类界定依据分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(4):123-129.
	ZHAO Y M, CHENG L P, LI J J, et al. Research on the definition of soil types in typical black soil regions of Northeast China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(4):123-129.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	刘某承, 李文华. 基于净初级生产力的中国各地生态足迹均衡因子测算[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(5):401-406.
	LIU M C, LI W H. Calculation of equivalence factor used in ecological footprint for China and its provinces based on net primary production[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010, 26(5):401-406. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	FANG J Y, GUO Z D, PIAO S L, et al. Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981-2000[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2007, 50(9):1341-1350. DOI URL
[24]	杭晓宁, 张健, 胡留杰, 等. 2006—2015年重庆市农田生态系统碳足迹分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 44(5):524-531.
	HANG X N, ZHANG J, HU L J, et al. Analysis of carbon footprints in farmland ecosystem of Chongqing City 2006-2015[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 44(5):524-531.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	靳亚亚, 柳乾坤, 李陈. 基于改进三维生态足迹模型的耕地承载力评价: 以江苏省为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(9):96-104.
	JIN Y Y, LIU Q K, LI C. Evaluation of cultivated land carrying capacity based on an improved three-dimension ecological footprint model: a case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(9):96-104.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	谢高地, 肖玉. 农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(6):645-651.
	XIE G D, XIAO Y. Review of agro-ecosystem services and their values[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(6):645-651.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[27]	李晓燕. 基于生态价值量和支付能力的耕地生态补偿标准研究: 以河南省为例[J]. 生态经济, 2017, 33(2):151-155.
	LI X Y. Study on the ecological compensation standard of cultivated land based on the ecological value and the ability of payment: taking Henan Province as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 2017, 33(2):151-155.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[28]	田义超, 白晓永, 黄远林, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的赤水河流域生态补偿标准核算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(11):312-322.
	TIAN Y C, BAI X Y, HUANG Y L, et al. Ecological compensation standard accounting of Chishui river basin based on ecosystem service value[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(11):312-322.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	刘祥鑫, 蒲春玲, 刘志有, 等. 区域耕地生态价值补偿量化研究: 以新疆为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(5):84-90.
	LIU X X, PU C L, LIU Z Y, et al. Quantitatively study on ecological value compensation of regional cultivated land: taking Xinjiang as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(5):84-90.(in Chinese with English abstract)

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

1272

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	7	0	0	1265

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	937	335
比例	74%	26%

摘要

967

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	967

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	964	3
比例	100%	0%

年份 Year	哈尔滨Harbin		绥化Suihua		大庆Daqing		长春Changchun		四平Siping		铁岭Tieling
年份 Year	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2
2011	59.1	39.1	34.6	38.0	16.8	12.3	62.4	97.6	28.0	44.5	10.5	36.8
2012	61.1	38.2	35.5	35.6	17.3	11.4	64.4	85.8	28.5	44.5	10.6	37.5
2013	63.3	43.9	35.4	40.9	18.0	13.4	66.3	82.2	28.8	43.2	9.0	37.2
2014	64.2	43.9	36.0	44.1	18.1	13.8	67.6	78.1	29.4	44.8	9.3	42.9
2015	64.9	42.0	37.0	41.8	18.7	13.8	70.3	82.6	30.4	46.3	9.6	33.4
2016	68.3	43.3	38.6	43.2	19.7	13.2	73.8	71.8	31.8	40.2	10.6	33.9
2017	67.8	50.4	37.4	48.0	19.7	25.9	73.6	65.8	31.4	37.2	10.0	31.1
2018	62.4	49.0	34.4	46.8	18.1	27.0	67.9	79.9	28.9	43.6	9.2	36.8

年份 Year	哈尔滨Harbin		绥化Suihua		大庆Daqing		长春Changchun		四平Siping		铁岭Tieling
年份 Year	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2	E_f1	E_f2
2011	59.1	39.1	34.6	38.0	16.8	12.3	62.4	97.6	28.0	44.5	10.5	36.8
2012	61.1	38.2	35.5	35.6	17.3	11.4	64.4	85.8	28.5	44.5	10.6	37.5
2013	63.3	43.9	35.4	40.9	18.0	13.4	66.3	82.2	28.8	43.2	9.0	37.2
2014	64.2	43.9	36.0	44.1	18.1	13.8	67.6	78.1	29.4	44.8	9.3	42.9
2015	64.9	42.0	37.0	41.8	18.7	13.8	70.3	82.6	30.4	46.3	9.6	33.4
2016	68.3	43.3	38.6	43.2	19.7	13.2	73.8	71.8	31.8	40.2	10.6	33.9
2017	67.8	50.4	37.4	48.0	19.7	25.9	73.6	65.8	31.4	37.2	10.0	31.1
2018	62.4	49.0	34.4	46.8	18.1	27.0	67.9	79.9	28.9	43.6	9.2	36.8

年份 Year	哈尔滨Harbin		绥化Suihua		大庆Daqing		长春Changchun		四平Siping		铁岭Tieling
年份 Year	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c
2011	78.7	213.7	53.7	192.1	22.9	69.9	111.2	146.1	50.3	137.0	28.9	58.8
2012	80.2	224.1	53.3	213.3	23.0	79.9	107.3	160.5	50.8	136.5	29.4	61.5
2013	85.3	187.7	55.8	178.0	24.7	66.3	107.4	171.5	50.4	140.2	27.6	62.5
2014	86.2	194.5	58.0	183.6	25.0	70.0	106.6	168.4	51.9	134.9	30.7	58.1
2015	85.9	191.2	57.9	178.3	25.6	69.3	111.6	163.7	53.6	131.3	26.3	65.8
2016	90.0	171.9	60.2	155.8	26.3	49.9	109.7	166.9	51.9	130.3	27.5	64.8
2017	93.0	161.5	61.5	131.5	32.7	64.8	106.5	174.1	50.0	127.6	25.6	63.1
2018	86.9	145.5	57.8	131.3	31.6	65.0	107.8	144.5	50.7	115.1	27.6	52.8

年份 Year	哈尔滨Harbin		绥化Suihua		大庆Daqing		长春Changchun		四平Siping		铁岭Tieling
年份 Year	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c	E_f	E_c
2011	78.7	213.7	53.7	192.1	22.9	69.9	111.2	146.1	50.3	137.0	28.9	58.8
2012	80.2	224.1	53.3	213.3	23.0	79.9	107.3	160.5	50.8	136.5	29.4	61.5
2013	85.3	187.7	55.8	178.0	24.7	66.3	107.4	171.5	50.4	140.2	27.6	62.5
2014	86.2	194.5	58.0	183.6	25.0	70.0	106.6	168.4	51.9	134.9	30.7	58.1
2015	85.9	191.2	57.9	178.3	25.6	69.3	111.6	163.7	53.6	131.3	26.3	65.8
2016	90.0	171.9	60.2	155.8	26.3	49.9	109.7	166.9	51.9	130.3	27.5	64.8
2017	93.0	161.5	61.5	131.5	32.7	64.8	106.5	174.1	50.0	127.6	25.6	63.1
2018	86.9	145.5	57.8	131.3	31.6	65.0	107.8	144.5	50.7	115.1	27.6	52.8

年份Year	哈尔滨Harbin	绥化Suihua	大庆Daqing	长春Changchun	四平Siping	铁岭Tieling
2011	135.06	138.45	47.04	34.83	86.75	29.94
2012	143.93	160.00	56.93	53.20	85.74	32.18
2013	102.43	122.24	41.56	64.13	89.76	34.87
2014	108.35	125.54	45.02	61.81	83.02	27.39
2015	105.33	120.35	43.73	52.07	77.76	39.50
2016	81.97	95.59	23.61	57.18	78.45	37.30
2017	68.48	70.02	32.08	67.64	77.57	37.48
2018	58.60	73.44	33.46	36.70	64.44	25.16

粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究

Quantitative research on ecological compensation for cultivated land in black soil region in northeast China from perspective of food security

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 29

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

年份Year	哈尔滨Harbin	绥化Suihua	大庆Daqing	长春Changchun	四平Siping	铁岭Tieling
2011	6.824	6.672	2.379	1.372	4.570	1.353
2012	7.467	8.323	3.165	2.239	4.433	1.455
2013	4.401	5.167	1.868	2.859	4.725	1.590
2014	4.695	5.329	2.049	2.659	4.063	1.108
2015	4.476	4.915	1.920	2.156	3.668	1.795
2016	3.216	3.570	0.865	2.407	3.726	1.675
2017	2.439	2.282	1.092	2.944	3.649	1.653
2018	1.950	2.360	1.095	1.305	2.595	0.919

[1]	罗海平, 周静逸, 何志文. 基于县域尺度的粮食主产区耕地压力空间分异及其影响因子实证研究与预警[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1493-1506.
[2]	李子琳, 韩逸, 郭熙, 国佳欣, 林雯璐. 基于结构方程模型的高安市耕地产能影响因素研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 866-877.
[3]	黄锦东. 福建省粮食生产的耕地利用效应时空分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 923-930.
[4]	罗海平, 潘柳欣, 余兆鹏. 基于粮食安全贡献度的中国粮食主产区粮食供求格局演变[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2077-2087.
[5]	张会芳, 尹海燕, 冀保毅, 卓文飞. 1980—2013年河南省粮食生产特点及安全保障机制研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(1): 1-7.
[6]	田秋霞;张仁陟*. 社会转型期县域耕地需求量组合研究[J]. , 2014, 26(1): 0-176.
[7]	史常亮;王忠平*. 基于供求视角的中国粮食安全影响因素研究[J]. , 2013, 25(5): 0-1152.
[8]	张慧芳;吴宇哲;*;何良将. 我国推行休耕制度的探讨[J]. , 2013, 25(1): 0-170.
[9]	胡清宇;陆尤尤;龚士东;杨冰;陈长青;*. 浙江文成县近10年生态足迹与生态可持续发展分析[J]. , 2012, 24(4): 0-692.
[10]	许连君;支炳义;刘卫东. 金华市区域土地利用变化及其驱动力分析[J]. , 2007, 19(2): 0-110.