品种权开放许可——理论阐释、规范构造与运行保障

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.24

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 2055-2065.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.09.24

品种权开放许可——理论阐释、规范构造与运行保障

万志前(), 周贤桀()

华中农业大学文法学院, 农业农村法治创新研究中心, 湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2022-01-04 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-09-30
作者简介:*周贤桀,E-mail: 535900902@qq.com
万志前(1974—),男,湖北仙桃人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为农业知识产权。E-mail: wzihou@sina.com
通讯作者: 周贤桀
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金(16BFX168);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2662019PY042);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2662022WFYJ003);湖北2021年度专利转化专项计划(高校院所类)

Open license of variety rights: theoretical explanation, normative structure and operation guarantee

WAN Zhiqian(), ZHOU Xianjie()

Agricultural and Rural Laws Innovation Research Center, College of Humanities & Social Sciences,Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2022-01-04 Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-09-30
Contact: ZHOU Xianjie

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

品种权开放许可是一种遵循自愿原则,体现开放共享、责任规则精神的品种权许可创新模式。品种权开放许可制度具有减少交易成本、加速育种成果转化、促进育种开放式创新的功能。本文从理论阐释、规范构造和运行保障方面对我国引入品种权开放许可问题进行了学术探讨,认为应围绕申请主体、开放许可声明与合同订立、年费减免与撤回等方面构造品种权开放许可制度,通过明确行政部门职能,完善多元纠纷解决机制,建立失信行为惩戒机制等保障品种权开放许可制度的运行。建议在我国植物新品种保护制度中引入开放许可制度,同时考虑该制度的运行成本、吸引力,以及与我国国情的契合性,以充分发挥其制度功能,促进品种创新与转化,更好地保障国家粮食安全。

关键词: 品种权, 开放许可, 年费减免, 撤回

Abstract:

As an innovative model, the open license of variety rights follows the voluntary principle and embodies the spirit of open sharing and responsibility rules. Open license system can reduce transaction costs, accelerate the transformation of variety rights, and promote breeding innovation. In the present study, the open license of variety rights in China is discussed from theoretical explanation, normative structure and operation guarantee. The specification for the open license system of variety rights should be constructed around the subject of the application, the declaration of open license and the conclusion of the contract, the annual fee reduction and withdrawal. The operation of this system should be guaranteed by clarifying the functions of management departments, improving multiple dispute resolution mechanisms, and establishing a punishment mechanism for untrustworthy behaviors. It is suggested that an open license system should be introduced into China’s plant variety protection law. This system should have proper operating costs, attractiveness and should be suitable for China’s conditions, hence to promote the creation and transformation of variety rights, and ensure national food security with its special institutional function.

Key words: variety rights, open license, annual fee reduction, withdraw

中图分类号:

S-9
D923.4

万志前, 周贤桀. 品种权开放许可——理论阐释、规范构造与运行保障[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(9): 2055-2065.

WAN Zhiqian, ZHOU Xianjie. Open license of variety rights: theoretical explanation, normative structure and operation guarantee[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 2055-2065.

参考文献 50

[1]	乔金亮, 吉蕾蕾. 种业问题调查[N]. 经济日报, 2022-04-12( 1).
[2]	张彩霞, 陈会英. 植物品种权许可实施合同选择分析[J]. 农业科研经济管理, 2013(3): 21-26.
	ZHANG C X, CHEN H Y. Analysis of plant varieties right license contract selection[J]. Management for Economy in Agricultural Scientific Research, 2013(3): 21-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	MERGES R P. Contracting into liability rules: intellectual property rights and collective rights organizations[J]. California Law Review, 1996, 84(5): 1293. DOI URL
[4]	刘强. 专利开放许可费认定问题研究[J]. 知识产权, 2021, 31(7): 3-23.
	LIU Q. A study on the determination of patent open license royalties[J]. Intellectual Property, 2021, 31(7): 3-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	卜红星. “互联网+”时代专利开放许可的构建研究[J]. 科技与法律, 2020(3): 8-13.
	BU H X. Construction of patent open license in the era of “Internet+”[J]. Science Technology and Law, 2020(3): 8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	陈琼娣. 共享经济视角下的专利开放许可实践及制度价值[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(11): 86-93.
	CHEN Q D. Practice and value of open patenting license under the sharing economy[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018(11): 86-93. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	曹源. 论专利当然许可[J]. 私法, 2017, 27(1):128-259.
	CAO Y. Research on the patent license of right system[J]. Private Law Review, 2017, 27(01): 128-259. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	赵锐. 开放许可: 制度优势与法律构造[J]. 知识产权, 2017, 27(6): 56-61.
	ZHAO R. Open license: institutional advantages and legal construction[J]. Intellectual Property, 2017, 27(6): 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	罗莉. 专利行政部门在开放许可制度中应有的职能[J]. 法学评论, 2019, 37(2): 61-71.
	LUO L. Proper functions of patent administration department in open license system[J]. Law Review, 2019, 37(2): 61-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	张扬欢. 责任规则视角下的专利开放许可制度[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(5): 186-208.
	ZHANG Y H. The patent licencing system under the perspective of liability rules[J]. Tsinghua University Law Journal, 2019, 13(5): 186-208. (in Chinese)
[11]	KESAN J P, JANIS M D. U. S. plant variety protection: sound and fury...?[J]. Houston Law Review, 2002, 39(3):728-778.
[12]	VICENTE-SAEZ R, MARTINEZ-FUENTES C. Open science now: a systematic literature review for an integrated definition[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88: 428-436. DOI URL
[13]	LEE S M, OLSON D L, TRIMI S. Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values[J]. Management Decision, 2012, 50(5): 817-831. DOI URL
[14]	LAURSEN K, SALTER A J. The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(5): 867-878. DOI URL
[15]	CALABRESI G, MELAMED A D. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1972, 85(6): 1089. DOI URL
[16]	杨涛. 论知识产权法中停止侵害救济方式的适用: 以财产规则与责任规则为分析视角[J]. 法商研究, 2018, 35(1): 182-192.
	YANG T. On the application of stop infringement remedies in intellectual property law: from the perspective of property rules and liability rules[J]. Studies in Law and Business, 2018, 35(1): 182-192. (in Chinese)
[17]	凌斌. 法律救济的规则选择: 财产规则、责任规则与卡梅框架的法律经济学重构[J]. 中国法学, 2012(6): 5-25.
	LING B. Classifying rules and comparing efficiency of legal remedies: restructuring property rules, liability rules and Cameron framework from a legal and economic perspective[J]. China Legal Science, 2012(6): 5-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	孙浦阳, 张靖佳, 姜小雨. 电子商务、搜寻成本与消费价格变化[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(7): 139-154.
	SUN P Y, ZHANG J J, JIANG X Y. E-commerce, searching cost and consumer price change: evidence from the micro retailing market[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(7): 139-154. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	欧洲专利局. 未来知识产权制度的愿景[M]. 郭民生, 杜建慧, 刘卫红,译. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2008: 158.
[20]	CAVIGGIOLI F, UGHETTO E. The drivers of patent transactions: corporate views on the market for patents[J]. R&D Management, 2013, 43(4): 318-332.
[21]	吴汉东. 关于知识产权基本制度的经济学思考[J]. 法学, 2000(4): 33-41.
	WU H D. Economic thinking on the basic system of intellectual property[J]. Law Science, 2000(4): 33-41. (in Chinese)
[22]	冯晓青. 知识产权法利益平衡理论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2006: 555.
[23]	DAI Q, SHINI E, SMITH C. Open and inclusive collaboration in science: a framework[EB/OL].(2018-07-30) [2022-01-04]. https://doi.org/10.1787/2dbff737-en.
[24]	HARDT M, NEGRI A. Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire[M]. New York: Penguin, 2005:304.
[25]	VON HIPPEL E. Lead users: a source of novel product concepts[J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(7): 791-805. DOI URL
[26]	LÜTHJE C, HERSTATT C, VON HIPPEL E. User-innovators and “local” information: the case of mountain biking[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(6): 951-965. DOI URL
[27]	HARHOFF D, LAKHANI K R. 创新的革命: 开放式创新改变未来商业[M]. 崔毅, 杨阳, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 264.
[28]	余菲菲, 燕蕾. 创新社区中用户创新的创新效应及意见探究: 以海尔HOPE创新平台为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(2): 55-67.
	YU F F, YAN L. The innovation effect of user innovation in the innovation community and improvement strategy: a study of haier open innovation platform[J]. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2017, 38(2): 55-67. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	宋刚, 张楠. 创新2.0: 知识社会环境下的创新民主化[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(10): 60-66.
	SONG G, ZHANG N. Innovation 2.0: democratizing innovation in knowledge society[J]. China Soft Science, 2009(10): 60-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	STIGLITZ E J. Intellectual property rights, the pool of knowledge, and innovation[J]. NBER Working Paper, 2014 (w20014): 1-30.
[31]	冷博峰, 李谷成, 冯中朝, 等. 农户对油菜品种不同性状主观需求的变化趋势与群体间差异分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(2): 55-66.
	LENG B F, LI G C, FENG Z C, et al. Variation trend and group differences analysis on farmers’ subjective demand of rapeseed variety characters in China[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2021, 40(2): 55-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	HELLER M A. The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1998, 111(3): 621. DOI URL
[33]	蔡元臻, 薛原. 新《专利法》实施下我国专利开放许可制度的确立与完善[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2020(6): 83-94.
	CAI Y Z, XUE Y. The establishment and improvement of China’s patent open license system under the implementation of new patent law[J]. Business and Economic Law Review, 2020(6): 83-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	ALISON F. Licences of right “new existing patents” under the patents Act1977[J]. European Intellectual Property Review, 1986, 8(6):168-174.
[35]	谢嘉图. 缺陷与重构: 当然许可制度的经济分析: 以《专利法修稿草案(送审稿)》为中心[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 26(4): 97-103.
	XIE J T. Economic analysis of licences of right: centring on China patent law(manuscript)[J]. Journal of Xidian University (Social Science Edition), 2016, 26(4): 97-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	黄玉烨, 李建忠. 专利当然许可声明的性质探析: 兼评《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》[J]. 政法论丛, 2017(2): 145-152.
	HUANG Y Y, LI J Z. Exploratory analysis of the statement of license of right: focus on the draft amendment to the patent law(manuscript)[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2017(2): 145-152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	RUCKMAN K, MCCARTHY I. Why do some patents get licensed while others do not?[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2016, 26(4): 667-688. DOI URL
[38]	瀬川友史, 小林徹, 渡部俊也. 独におけるライセンス·オブ·ライト制度およびその利用実態[EB/OL].(2009-12-31)[2022-01-04]. https://pari.ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/WP09_02.html.
[39]	尹田. 法国现代合同法:契约自由与社会公正的冲突与平衡[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009:221-222.
[40]	张力. 实践性合同的诺成化变迁及其解释[J]. 学术论坛, 2007, 30(9): 140-145.
	ZHANG L. The promised changes of practical contracts and their interpretation[J]. Academic Forum, 2007, 30(9): 140-145. (in Chinese)
[41]	易继明. 评中国专利法第四次修订草案[J]. 私法, 2018(2): 2-81.
	YI J M. Comment on the fourth amendment to the patent law of China[J]. Private Law Review, 2018(2): 2-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	乔永忠. 专利收费制度影响专利行为程度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12): 155-162.
	QIAO Y Z. A research on the level of impact of patent charging system on patent behaviors[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 155-162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	易继明. 专利法的转型: 从二元结构到三元结构: 评《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》第8章及修改条文建议[J]. 法学杂志, 2017, 38(7): 41-51.
	YI J M. The transformation of patent law: from dualistic structure to triadic structure: comments on chapter viii of the revised draft of patent law (draft submitted) and amendment proposals[J]. Law Science Magazine, 2017, 38(7): 41-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44]	符晓波, 江耘. 唤醒“沉睡的生产力” 浙江率先试点“专利免费用”[N]. 科技日报, 2021-10-21(2).
[45]	王霞, 易建勋. 专利行政调解协议的效力及其固化[J]. 知识产权, 2017, 27(2): 81-87.
	WANG X, YI J X. Effectiveness of administrative mediation agreements and its reinforcement[J]. Intellectual Property, 2017, 27(2): 81-87. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46]	刘友华, 朱蕾. 专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认制度的困境与出路[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 44(6): 85-91.
	LIU Y H, ZHU L. The dilemma and outlet of judicial confirmation of administrative dispute agreement on patent disputes[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2020, 44(6): 85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47]	CARON D D. The world of intellectual property and the decision to arbitrate[J]. Arbitration International, 2014, 19(4): 441-450. DOI URL
[48]	杜焕芳. 知识产权仲裁机构建设: 理论证成、域外借鉴和制度设计[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2021(1): 96-115.
	DU H F. Arbitration institution of intellectual property: theoretical demonstration, overseas experience and system design[J]. Commercial Arbitration & Mediation, 2021(1): 96-115. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	刘俊海. 信用责任: 正在生长中的第四大法律责任[J]. 法学论坛, 2019, 34(6): 5-17.
	LIU J H. Credit liability as the fourth growing legal liability[J]. Legal Forum, 2019, 34(6): 5-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[50]	柯林霞. 诚信社会建设背景下知识产权失信行为的法律规制[J]. 电子知识产权, 2021(7): 21-34.
	KE L X. Legal regulation on dishonest behavior in the field of intellectual property in the context of building the integrity society[J]. Electronics Intellectual Property, 2021(7): 21-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)

品种权开放许可——理论阐释、规范构造与运行保障

Open license of variety rights: theoretical explanation, normative structure and operation guarantee

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 50

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	师帅, 周林庆. 中国农业碳中和评价——以2010—2020年为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1920-1933.
[2]	魏超, 陈盛伟, 牛浩, 李政. 农业保险保障水平与农业收入的“倒U型”关系——基于农业产业融合视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 225-234.
[3]	孙永朋, 徐萍, 毛文琳, 王美青, 王宇晗. 浙江农民收入结构优化、均衡增长的对策研究——基于县域数据的实证分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2742-2750.
[4]	张文斐. 农业自然资源资产监管模式的法经济学分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2265-2274.
[5]	韦小良, 王英. 基于旅游凝视理论的共同富裕背景下乡村旅游资源开发研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1950-1959.
[6]	张婉君, 朱利中, 陈丁江, 吴东雷, 王飞儿, 张清宇. 乡村环境治理现代化水平评价:以2019年为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 913-921.
[7]	曾小春, 李随成, 史官清, 邢泽宇. “双碳”目标背景下基于熵权TOPSIS法的区域农业高质量发展水平综合评价——基于变化速度特征视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(4): 962-972.
[8]	张艳彬, 耿槟, 梁颖, 许调娟, 徐保根, 曾新, 张悦悦. “标准地”政策促进现代农业产业高质量发展的作用机制研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 688-697.
[9]	王宁柯, 张瑞, 章胜勇. 机械化服务程度和农地经营规模对玉米生产效率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 698-707.
[10]	王萍萍. 土地确权对农业生产率的影响——基于中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)的双重差分研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 455-467.
[11]	王博, 陈秋霖, 万晶晶. 新发展阶段乡村发展的时空逻辑与突破方向[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 468-476.
[12]	罗海平, 潘柳欣, 胡学英, 刘祖光. 我国粮食主产区耕地利用变化的粮食与生态效应研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 226-237.
[13]	李宝值, 卓妮, 黄河啸, 朱奇彪. 基于绿色发展理念的浙江“26县”政策对城乡收入差距的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 238-248.
[14]	魏政, 曹光乔. 城市化有利于农业机械化吗?——基于中国县域面板数据的实证分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2778-2788.
[15]	刘恩玲, 罗小锋, 杜三峡, 闫阿倩, 王祥礼. 老龄化、种植目的与稻农化学农药减量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(12): 2789-2799.