浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 1144-1152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230718
收稿日期:
2023-06-05
出版日期:
2024-05-25
发布日期:
2024-05-29
作者简介:
刘晨星(1994—),男,浙江义乌人,硕士,研究实习员,研究方向为食药同源植物加工及活性研究。E-mail cxliuzaas@163.com
通讯作者:
* 夏其乐,E-mail: cookxql@163.com
基金资助:
LIU Chenxing(), CAO Yan, XIA Qile*(
)
Received:
2023-06-05
Online:
2024-05-25
Published:
2024-05-29
摘要:
多花黄精根须一直以来被认为是利用价值低的加工副产物,极少有相关研究报道。该研究旨在明确多花黄精根须皂苷的较优提取工艺,并了解其抗氧化活性。响应面分析表明,最佳提取工艺为:72%乙醇体积分数,1:25 g·mL-1料液比,41 min提取时间。通过拟合分析得到提取率(Y)与乙醇体积分数(A)、料液比(B)、提取时间(C)的关系方程为:Y=5.58+0.516 2A+0.078 8B+0.05C-0.02AB-0.007 5AC-0.002 5BC-1.38A2-0.439 5B2-0.257C2。通过验证表明,最优条件下皂苷提取率为5.62%,与理论最高值5.628%非常接近。体外抗氧化试验结果表明,皂苷IC50 DPPH值为0.87 mg·mL-1, IC50 ABTS值为0.68 mg·mL-1,具有良好的抗氧化性。综上,多花黄精根须中的皂苷成分具有可观的利用价值。研究结果可为多花黄精根须综合利用提供重要依据,也为其他副产物活性成分提取提供参考。
中图分类号:
刘晨星, 曹艳, 夏其乐. 多花黄精根须皂苷的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1144-1152.
LIU Chenxing, CAO Yan, XIA Qile. Study on the extraction processing and antioxidant activities of saponins from Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua roots[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1144-1152.
水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
乙醇体积分数 Ethanol volume fraction/% | 料液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(g·mL-1) | 提取时间 Extraction time/min | |
-1 | 60 | 1:20 | 35 |
0 | 70 | 1:25 | 40 |
1 | 80 | 1:30 | 45 |
表1 响应面试验设计
Table 1 Response surface experimental design
水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
乙醇体积分数 Ethanol volume fraction/% | 料液比 Solid-liquid ratio/(g·mL-1) | 提取时间 Extraction time/min | |
-1 | 60 | 1:20 | 35 |
0 | 70 | 1:25 | 40 |
1 | 80 | 1:30 | 45 |
编号 No. | A | B | C | 提取率 Extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.56 |
2 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 3.37 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.62 |
4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.55 |
5 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 3.47 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.59 |
7 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 4.94 |
8 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 4.76 |
9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.01 |
10 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 3.19 |
11 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 4.84 |
12 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 4.20 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.59 |
14 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 3.33 |
15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.30 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.56 |
17 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 4.44 |
表2 响应面试验结果
Table 2 Response surface test results
编号 No. | A | B | C | 提取率 Extraction rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.56 |
2 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 3.37 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.62 |
4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.55 |
5 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 3.47 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.59 |
7 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 4.94 |
8 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 4.76 |
9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.01 |
10 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 3.19 |
11 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 4.84 |
12 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 4.20 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.59 |
14 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 3.33 |
15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.30 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.56 |
17 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 4.44 |
图5 不同乙醇体积分数和料液比的相互作用 A,3D响应面图;B,等高线图。图5-图7同。
Fig.5 Interaction of ethanol volume fractions and solid-liquid ratios A, 3D response surface map; B, Contour map.The same as in Figure 5-7.
来源 Source | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Sum of square | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 9 | 11.87 | 1.32 | 756.83 | <0.000 1 |
A | 1 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1 223.84 | <0.000 1 |
B | 1 | 0.049 6 | 0.049 6 | 28.48 | 0.001 1 |
C | 1 | 0.020 0 | 0.020 0 | 11.48 | 0.011 6 |
AB | 1 | 0.001 6 | 0.001 6 | 0.918 4 | 0.369 8 |
AC | 1 | 0.000 2 | 0.000 2 | 0.129 2 | 0.729 9 |
BC | 1 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.014 4 | 0.908 0 |
A2 | 1 | 8.01 | 8.01 | 4 599.35 | <0.000 1 |
B2 | 1 | 0.813 3 | 0.813 3 | 466.84 | <0.000 1 |
C2 | 1 | 0.278 1 | 0.278 1 | 159.63 | <0.000 1 |
失拟项Lack of fit | 3 | 0.009 7 | 0.003 2 | 5.12 | 0.074 3 |
误差Error | 4 | 0.002 5 | 0.000 6 | ||
总和Sum | 16 | 11.88 |
表3 回归方程系数显著性检验
Table 3 Significance test of the coefficients of the regression equation
来源 Source | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Sum of square | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 9 | 11.87 | 1.32 | 756.83 | <0.000 1 |
A | 1 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1 223.84 | <0.000 1 |
B | 1 | 0.049 6 | 0.049 6 | 28.48 | 0.001 1 |
C | 1 | 0.020 0 | 0.020 0 | 11.48 | 0.011 6 |
AB | 1 | 0.001 6 | 0.001 6 | 0.918 4 | 0.369 8 |
AC | 1 | 0.000 2 | 0.000 2 | 0.129 2 | 0.729 9 |
BC | 1 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.014 4 | 0.908 0 |
A2 | 1 | 8.01 | 8.01 | 4 599.35 | <0.000 1 |
B2 | 1 | 0.813 3 | 0.813 3 | 466.84 | <0.000 1 |
C2 | 1 | 0.278 1 | 0.278 1 | 159.63 | <0.000 1 |
失拟项Lack of fit | 3 | 0.009 7 | 0.003 2 | 5.12 | 0.074 3 |
误差Error | 4 | 0.002 5 | 0.000 6 | ||
总和Sum | 16 | 11.88 |
图8 DPPH自由基清除率(A)及样品和阳性对照的比较(B)拟合曲线 图(A)中红线代表阳性对照VC,黑线代表样品溶液。下同。
Fig.8 DPPH scavenging rate (A) and comperison of samples and positive control (B) fitting curve Red line stands for positive control (VC), black line stands for samples in Fig (A). The same as below.
[1] | NIE X H, WANG L Y, WANG S Y, et al. In vitro hypoglycemic and antioxidant activities of steamed Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua with various steaming degrees: relationship with homoisoflavonoids[J]. Food Bioscience, 2023, 53: 102518. |
[2] | 斯金平, 朱玉贤. 黄精:一种潜力巨大且不占农田的新兴优质杂粮[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2021, 51(11):1477-1484. |
Si J P, Zhu Y X. Polygonati rhizome: a new high-quality crop with great potential and not occupying farmland[J]. Scientia Sinica(Vitae), 2021, 51(11):1477-1484. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | SHI Y, SI D, CHEN D H, et al. Bioactive compounds from Polygonatum genus as anti-diabetic agents with future perspectives[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 408: 135183. |
[4] | LUO L, QIU Y X, GONG L M, et al. A review of Polygonatum Mill. genus: its taxonomy, chemical constituents, and pharmacological effect due to processing changes[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(15): 4821. |
[5] | YANG H J, ZHANG X H. Polysaccharides from Polygonatum odoratum strengthen antioxidant defense system and attenuate lipid peroxidation against exhaustive exercise-induced oxidative stress in mice[J]. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2017, 16(4): 795. |
[6] | 张英朔. 黄精皂苷的制备、抗癌活性及其机理[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2019. |
ZHANG Y S. Preparation, anti-cancer activity and molecule mechanism of saponins from Polygonatum sibiricum[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | XU C F, XIA B H, ZHANG Z M, et al. Research progress in steroidal saponins from the genus Polygonatum: chemical components, biosynthetic pathways and pharmacological effects[J]. Phytochemistry, 2023, 213: 113731. |
[8] | BI J Y, FANG H Y, ZHANG J Y, et al. A review on the application, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Polygonatum odoratum, an edible medicinal plant[J]. Journal of Future Foods, 2023, 3(3): 240-251. |
[9] | 邓宇, 潘广涛, 陈朝俊. 黄芪皂苷治疗阿尔茨海默病研究进展[J]. 中医学报, 2023, 38(5): 921-926. |
DENG Y, PAN G T, CHEN C J. Research progress of astragaloside in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Acta Chinese Medicine, 2023, 38(5): 921-926. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | GITANJALI J, DINESH RAM D S, KAVITHA R, et al. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, and antithrombotic, competency of saponins from the root of Decalepis hamiltonii[J]. Environmental Research, 2023, 231: 116096. |
[11] | WANG T T, SONG Y G, XU H H, et al. Study on the mechanism of reducing biofilm toxicity and increasing antioxidant activity in vinegar processing phytomedicines containing pentacyclic triterpenoid saponins[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2022, 290: 115112. |
[12] | KOŁODZIEJ B, S ȨCZYK Ł, SUGIER D, et al. Determination of the yield, saponin content and profile, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of three Gypsophila species[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2019, 138: 111422. |
[13] | 高海燕, 余欢迎, 金传山, 等. 多花黄精须根营养成分及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 中南药学, 2022, 20(6): 1262-1266. |
GAO H Y, YU H Y, JIN C S, et al. Nutrient compositions and antioxidant activity of fibrous root of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2022, 20(6): 1262-1266. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 王天梅, 王华磊, 李丹丹, 等. 多花黄精非药用部位活性成分及抗氧化性比较[J]. 食品与机械, 2022, 38(1): 57-60. |
WANG T M, WANG H L, LI D D, et al. Comparison of active components and antioxidant activity of non-medicinal parts of Polygonatum cyrtonema[J]. Food & Machinery, 2022, 38(1): 57-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | YAP J Y, HII C L, ONG S P, et al. Effects of drying on total polyphenols content and antioxidant properties of Carica papaya leaves[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020, 100(7): 2932-2937. |
[16] | 张莉, 李元祥, 向德轩. 黄精皂苷的结构特点及皂苷的提取工艺研究进展[J]. 怀化学院学报, 2022, 41(5): 14-18. |
ZHANG L, LI Y X, XIANG D X. Research progress in the structural characteristics and extraction technology of saponins in Polygonatum sibiricum[J]. Journal of Huaihua University, 2022, 41(5): 14-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 权利娜, 王露, 王嘉雯, 等. 多花黄精总皂苷的提取工艺及体外抗氧化研究[J]. 现代中医药, 2022, 42(5): 47-51. |
QUAN L N, WANG L, WANG J W, et al. Study on extraction technology and in vitro antioxidant activity of total saponins from Polygonatum multiflorum[J]. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2022, 42(5): 47-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | CUI Q, LIU J Z, XU W J, et al. Enhanced extraction and preconcentration of main target saponins from Panax notoginseng root using green and efficient formulated surfactant aqueous systems[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 210: 1507-1516. |
[19] | HU Y P, CUI X M, ZHANG Z J, et al. Optimisation of ethanol-reflux extraction of saponins from steamed Panax notoginseng by response surface methodology and evaluation of hematopoiesis effect[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23(5): 1206. |
[20] | GONG X C, CHEN H L, PAN J Y, et al. Optimization of Panax notoginseng extraction process using a design space approach[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 141: 197-206. |
[21] | YU X J, ZHAO Z M, YAN X L, et al. Extraction optimization of tea saponins from Camellia oleifera seed meal with deep eutectic solvents: composition identification and properties evaluation[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 427: 136681. |
[22] | LI X F, YANG Z, GAO Y T, et al. A novel electrochemical micro-titration method for quantitative evaluation of the DPPH free radical scavenging capacity of caffeic acid[J]. Open Chemistry, 2023, 21(1): DOI: 10.1515/chem-2022-0228. |
[23] | CHANG Y, WANG S Q, XU J Y, et al. Optimization of extraction process of Dioscorea nipponica Makino saponins and their UPLC-QTOF-MS profiling, antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2023, 16(4): 104630. |
[24] | SHARMA K, KAUR R, KUMAR S, et al. Saponins: a concise review on food related aspects, applications and health implications[J]. Food Chemistry Advances, 2023, 2: 100191. |
[25] | 陶新, 吴宛澐, 孙雨晴, 等. 正交设计优化中药类植物提取物组方[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2295-2303. |
TAO X, WU W Y, SUN Y Q, et al. Optimization of Chinese medicine plant extract compounds with orthogonal design[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(12): 2295-2303. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | SHI Y, LIU J J, SI D, et al. Huangjing-from medicine to healthy food and diet[J]. Food Frontiers, 2023, 4(3): 1068-1090. |
[27] | LI X L, MA R H, ZHANG F, et al. Evolutionary research trend of Polygonatum species: a comprehensive account of their transformation from traditional medicines to functional foods[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2023, 63(19): 3803-3820. |
[1] | 马波, 陶震, 周瑞, 王雪, 吕茜茜, 孙士红, 王寒, 高金秋, 张楚涵, 陈凤清. 花叶万年青功能成分提取条件优化与活性探究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(2): 383-393. |
[2] | 孙凤婷, 许振岚, 朱作艺, 张春荣, 汤涛, 赵学平, 盛清, 王强. 铁皮石斛的黄酮类成分测定及其生物可及性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(11): 2710-2719. |
[3] | 邵宇辰, 穆宏磊, 陈杭君, 殷军艺, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 刘瑞玲, 韩延超, 郜海燕. 肠道条件和粒径对加工山核桃体外消化的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1734-1742. |
[4] | 刘晶, 胡晓, 杨贤庆, 陈胜军, 吴燕燕, 李来好, 戚勃, 邓建朝. 龙须菜蛋白质的提取及其酶解产物的抗氧化特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1061-1072. |
[5] | 陈勤, 刘美佳, 刘迪秋, 曲媛, 崔秀明, 葛锋. PjFPS和Pjβ-AS双基因协同作用对珠子参皂苷生物合成的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 428-436. |
[6] | 沈留红, 钱柏霖, 尤留超, 张钺, 莘余, 吕尚揆, 肖劲邦, 余树民, 苏柘僮, 董可, 杨世林, 冯育林, 曹随忠. 白头翁皂苷B4对临床型奶牛乳房炎疗效和血清炎性因子、免疫因子的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1184-1191. |
[7] | 李雪, 张玉, 王君虹, 朱作艺, 孙素玲, 刘志, 朱申龙, 沈国新, Agusti ROMERO, 王伟. 初榨橄榄油中多酚化合物的UPLC-FLD检测及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(5): 907-915. |
[8] | 李园成, 孙宏, 吴逸飞, 姚晓红, 沈琦, 汤江武. 固态发酵棉籽仁的营养成分及其抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 610-615. |
[9] | 杨志, 李文义, 高云涛, 熊华斌, 陈毅坚, 杨慧娟. 响应面法优化针叶樱桃总黄酮的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1866-1872. |
[10] | 高帆, 夏惠, 王秀, 王进, 周琼, 吕秀兰, 梁东. 不同甜樱桃品种抗氧化物质及抗氧化活性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 926-932. |
[11] | 柴新义, 倪瓒鹏, 于士军, 张微微, 殷培峰. 黑木耳菌丝体液体发酵富硒条件优化及其多糖抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(11): 1903-1911. |
[12] | 唐宏刚,肖朝耿,叶梦迪,朱培培,陈黎洪*. 猪骨蛋白酶解液美拉德反应产物的抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(8): 1396-. |
[13] | 张强1,2,吴彩娥1,*. 羊肚菌菌丝体蛋白的理化特性及抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(8): 1408-. |
[14] | 金群力,张作法, 范丽军, 蔡为明*. 棕色双孢蘑菇子实体不同生长阶段抗氧化活性比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 797-. |
[15] | 郑雪良1,刘春荣1,*,王登亮1,毕旭灿2,杨波2,孙崇德3. 胡柚小青果的黄酮类化合物及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(7): 1185-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||