调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230072

浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1256-1269.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230072

调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析

许立婷(), 齐广平^*(), 康燕霞, 银敏华, 马彦麟, 贾琼, 汪精海, 姜渊博

甘肃农业大学水利水电工程学院,甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2023-01-16 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-02
作者简介:许立婷(1995—),女,甘肃兰州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为节水灌溉与农业生态研究。E-mail:1767573800@qq.com
通讯作者: *齐广平,E-mail:qigp@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51969003);国家自然科学基金(52069001);甘肃省高等学校产业支撑计划(2021CYZC-20);甘肃省高等学校青年博士基金(2022QB-088);甘肃省高等学校创新基金(2022B-101);甘肃省高等学校创新基金(2021CXZX-405);甘肃农业大学水利水电工程学院科研团队建设专项(Gaucwky-01)

Meta-analysis of effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of alfalfa

XU Liting(), QI Guangping^*(), KANG Yanxia, YIN Minhua, MA Yanlin, JIA Qiong, WANG Jinghai, JIANG Yuanbo

College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2023-01-16 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究不同影响因素条件下苜蓿产量和品质对调亏灌溉的响应,为苜蓿种植提供理论依据,通过整合已发表的相关田间试验数据,采用荟萃分析(meta-analysis),定量研究以充分灌溉为对照的调亏灌溉下苜蓿产量、品质的综合效应及其主要影响因素。结果表明:与充分灌溉相比,调亏灌溉的苜蓿产量降低19.3%(95%置信区间-22.5%~16.0%),但品质极显著(P<0.01)提升,粗蛋白含量平均提高14.5%(95%置信区间12.4%~16.6%),酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量分别平均降低10.8%(95%置信区间-12.3%~-9.2%)和13.2%(95%置信区间-14.4%~-11.9%)。综合产量和品质效应,在年平均气温0~5 ℃和>10~15 ℃、年降水量<200 mm和>400~800 mm的地区,种植密度>20~25 kg·hm^-2时,调亏灌溉有利于苜蓿稳产,且品质较高。在不同的农业生产区,以滴灌配合分生育期调亏、调亏度75%~85%(以田间持水量为基准)能够维持苜蓿较优的生产效应。

关键词: 苜蓿, 调亏灌溉, 产量, 品质, 荟萃分析

Abstract:

To explore the response of alfalfa yield and quality to regulated deficit irrigation under different influencing factors and provide theoretical basis for alfalfa planting, the comprehensive effect was quantitatively studied in the present study, as well as the main influencing factors under regulated deficit irrigation with full irrigation as the control by integrating published relevant field test data and using meta-analysis method. The results showed that, compared with the full irrigation, the yield of alfalfa under regulated deficit irrigation decreased by 19.3% (95% confidence interval:-22.5%-16.0%), but the quality was significantly (P<0.01) improved. The crude protein content was increased by 14.5% (95% confidence interval: 12.4%-16.6%), while the acid detergent fiber content and neutral detergent fiber content were decreased by 10.8% (95% confidence interval:-12.3%--9.2%) and 13.2% (95% confidence interval:-14.4%--11.9%), respectively. Given the yield and quality effects, annual average temperature of 0-5 ℃ and>10-15 ℃, annual precipitation of <200 mm and >400-800 mm, the regulated deficit irrigation would be conducive for the alfalfa yield and quality with planting density of >20-25 kg·hm^-2. In different agricultural production areas, the regulated deficit irrigation with drip irrigation, regulated deficit at different growth period, and a regulated deficit degree of 75%-85% (based on the field capacity) would maintain sound production effect of alfalfa.

Key words: alfalfa, deficit irrigation, yield, quality, meta-analysis

中图分类号:

S275.9

许立婷, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 银敏华, 马彦麟, 贾琼, 汪精海, 姜渊博. 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.

XU Liting, QI Guangping, KANG Yanxia, YIN Minhua, MA Yanlin, JIA Qiong, WANG Jinghai, JIANG Yuanbo. Meta-analysis of effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of alfalfa[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1256-1269.

图/表 8

图1 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量和品质影响的频次分布直方图和高斯分布曲线 n,样本量;AVE,平均值。下同。

Fig.1 Frequency distribution histogram and Gaussian distribution curve of regulated deficit irrigation on alfalfa yield and quality n, Sample size; AVE, Average. The same as below.

图2 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量(a)、粗蛋白含量(b)、酸性洗涤纤维含量(c)、中性洗涤纤维含量(d)的敏感性分析

Fig.2 Sensitivity analysis of regulated deficit irrigation on alfalfa yield (a), crude protein content (b), acid detergent fiber content (c) and neutral detergent fiber content (d)

表1 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量和品质的综合效应量

Table 1 Comprehensive effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of alfalfa

指标 Index	变化率 Change rate/%	95%置信区间 95% confidence interval/%		效应量检验结果 Effect test result		异质性检验结果 Heterogeneity test result		样本量 Sample size
指标 Index	变化率 Change rate/%	下限 Lower limit	上限 Upper limit	Z	P	Q	P	样本量 Sample size
产量Yield	-19.3	-22.5	16.0	-11.7	<0.000 1	243 615.5	<0.000 1	280
粗蛋白含量	14.5	12.4	16.6	13.6	<0.000 1	9 470.9	<0.000 1	109
Crude protein content
酸性洗涤纤维含量	-10.8	-12.3	-9.2	-13.3	<0.000 1	4 866.7	<0.000 1	83
Acid detergent fiber content
中性洗涤纤维含量	-13.2	-14.4	-11.9	-20.7	<0.000 1	3 530.8	<0.000 1	78
Neutral detergent fiber content

图3 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量(a)、粗蛋白含量(b)、酸性洗涤纤维含量(c)、中性洗涤纤维含量(d)的累计荟萃分析

Fig.3 Cumulative meta-analysis of regulated deficit irrigation on alfalfa yield (a), crude protein content (b), acid detergent fiber content (c) and neutral detergent fiber content (d)

图4 调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量的影响因素分析调亏度以田间持水量为基准。下同。

Fig.4 Analysis on influencing factors of regulated deficit irrigation on alfalfa yield The deficient degree is measured based on the field capacity.The same as below.

图5 调亏灌溉对苜蓿粗蛋白含量的影响因素分析

Fig.5 Analysis on influencing factors of regulated deficit irrigation on crude protein content of alfalfa

图6 调亏灌溉对苜蓿酸性洗涤纤维含量的影响因素分析

Fig.6 Analysis on influencing factors of regulated deficit irrigation on acid detergent fiber content of alfalfa

图7 调亏灌溉对苜蓿中性洗涤纤维含量的影响因素分析

Fig.7 Analysis on influencing factors of regulated deficit irrigation on neutral detergent fiber content of alfalfa

参考文献 37

[1]	孙延亮, 赵宇哲, 魏孔钦, 等. 不同秋眠级紫花苜蓿茎和叶的碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(5): 9-19.
	SUN Y L, ZHAO Y Z, WEI K Q, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in stems and leaves of alfalfa with different fall dormancy levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(5): 9-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	王瑞港, 徐伟平. 我国苜蓿产业发展特征与趋势分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 7-12.
	WANG R G, XU W P. Development characteristics and trend of alfalfa industry in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	陶莎, 王玉庭, 张峭. 国内苜蓿草供需现状及中美贸易摩擦带来的影响与对策[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2019, 40(10): 46-50.
	TAO S, WANG Y T, ZHANG Q. Situation of domestic alfalfa market and the impact from sino-US trade frictions and its countermeasures[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2019, 40(10): 46-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	YIN M H, MA Y L, KANG Y X, et al. Optimized farmland mulching improves alfalfa yield and water use efficiency based on meta-analysis and regression analysis[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 267: 107617.
[5]	康绍忠. 贯彻落实国家节水行动方案推动农业适水发展与绿色高效节水[J]. 中国水利, 2019(13): 1-6.
	KANG S Z. National water conservation initiative for promoting water-adapted and green agriculture and highly-efficient water use[J]. China Water Resources, 2019(13): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	姜渊博, 齐广平, 银敏华, 等. 水分调控与种植模式对人工草地土壤水分及产量品质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 260-270.
	JIANG Y B, QI G P, YIN M H, et al. Effects of water regulation and planting patterns on soil moisture, yield and quality in artificial grassland[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(6): 260-270. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	董姗, 王皓, 贾倩民, 等. 灌溉模式与种植方式对河西地区青贮玉米生长、产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1111-1120.
	DONG S, WANG H, JIA Q M, et al. Effects of irrigation modes and planting patterns on the growth, yield and economic benefits of silage maize in Hexi region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1111-1120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 等. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
	LI P Z, ZHAO D Q, DENG B, et al. Effects of biochar addition and drought stress on photosynthetic efficiency and growth of alfalfa inoculated with rhizobia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	李昊, 李世平, 南灵. 中国农户土地流转意愿影响因素: 基于29篇文献的Meta分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(7): 78-93.
	LI H, LI S P, NAN L. Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to transfer land in china: meta-analysis based on 29 literatures[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017(7): 78-93. (in Chinese)
[10]	陆姣云, 熊军波, 张鹤山, 等. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿产量、品质和微量元素的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 126-133.
	LU J Y, XIONG J B, ZHANG H S, et al. Effects of water stress on yield, quality and trace element composition of alfalfa[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 126-133. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	潘玲, 魏臻武, 武自念, 等. 施肥和播种量对扬州地区苜蓿生长特性和产草量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(6): 1099-1104.
	PAN L, WEI Z W, WU Z N, et al. Effects of fertilizers and sowing rates on growth characteristics and forage yields of alfalfa in Yangzhou region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(6): 1099-1104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	LIU M G, WANG Z K, MU L, et al. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation on alfalfa performance under two irrigation systems in the inland arid area of Midwestern China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 248: 106764.
[13]	寇丹, 苏德荣, 吴迪, 等. 地下调亏滴灌对紫花苜蓿耗水、产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(2): 116-123.
	KOU D, SU D R, WU D, et al. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on water consumption, hay yield and quality of alfalfa under subsurface drip irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(2): 116-123. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	孟洋洋, 李茂娜, 王云玲, 等. 灌水下限对紫花苜蓿产量、品质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(2): 1-9.
	MENG Y Y, LI M N, WANG Y L, et al. Effects of the irrigation low limits on alfalfa yield, quality and water use efficiency[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2020, 39(2): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	徐文婷, 苏德荣, 刘自学, 等. 地下滴灌条件下水钾耦合对紫花苜蓿的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(3): 52-56.
	XU W T, SU D R, LIU Z X, et al. Effect of potassium coupled with water on alfalfa under drip irrigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(3): 52-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	银敏华, 马彦麟, 康燕霞, 等. 氮素添加对中国苜蓿产量与品质效应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(9): 36-49.
	YIN M H, MA Y L, KANG Y X, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on alfalfa yield and quality in China: a meta-analysis[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 36-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	才璐, 罗珠珠, 王林林, 等. 施肥对苜蓿土壤水分、养分和产量的影响:基于定位试验数据的Meta分析[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(1): 160-170.
	CAI L, LUO Z Z, WANG L L, et al. Meta-analysis on response of soil moisture, nutrients, and alfalfa yield to fertilization based on location test data[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(1): 160-170. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	ZHAO X, HE C, LIU W S, et al. Responses of soil pH to no-till and the factors affecting it: a global meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28(1): 154-166.
[19]	莫启顺, 秦王菲, 张清平, 等. 整合分析施氮与水分输入梯度对中国北方玉米产量、氮肥生产力及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(2): 399-411.
	MO Q S, QIN W F, ZHANG Q P, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen and water input gradients on maize yield, nitrogen fertilizer productivity, and water use efficiency in Northern China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(2): 399-411. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 等. 中国苜蓿施肥产量效应的Meta分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(3): 838-848.
	CAI L, WANG L L, LUO Z Z, et al. Meta-analysis of yield effects of fertilization on alfalfa in China[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(3): 838-848. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	吴克宁, 赵瑞. 土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(1): 227-241.
	WU K N, ZHAO R. Soil texture classification and its application in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2019, 56(1): 227-241. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	陶雪, 苏德荣, 寇丹, 等. 西北旱区灌溉方式对苜蓿生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 114-120.
	TAO X, SU D R, KOU D, et al. Effects of irrigation methods on growth and water use efficiency of alfalfa in arid northwest China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 114-120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	苏鹏海, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 等. 枸杞苜蓿间作模式下调亏灌溉对苜蓿光合特性和生物量的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2019(8): 71-75.
	SU P H, QI G P, KANG Y X, et al. The effects of deficit irrigation on photosynthetic and biomass of alfalfa in wolfberry-alfalfa intercropping pattern[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019(8): 71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	汪精海, 李广, 银敏华, 等. 调亏灌溉对高寒荒漠区人工混播草地土壤环境与牧草生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(1): 95-106.
	WANG J H, LI G, YIN M H, et al. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on the soil environment and forage growth of mixed-species forage plantings in China’s high-cold desert area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 95-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	银敏华, 李援农, 申胜龙, 等. 中国可降解膜覆盖对玉米产量效应的Meta分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(19): 1-9.
	YIN M H, LI Y N, SHEN S L, et al. Meta-analysis on effect of degradable film mulching on maize yield in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(19): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	吴晓茜, 夏桂敏, 李永发, 等. 调亏灌溉对黑花生生长、光合特性及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2018, 49(1): 57-64.
	WU X Q, XIA G M, LI Y F, et al. Effect of regulated deficited irrigation on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of black peanut[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018, 49(1): 57-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	方瑞元, 曾翰国, 郑万菊, 等. 两种滴灌方式下紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦单播与混播草地第一茬牧草生产力研究[J]. 草学, 2023(1): 40-44.
	FANG R Y, ZENG H G, ZHENG W J, et al. Study on the productivity of alfalfa and smooth bromegrass in mono-culture and mixed-culture under two drip irrigation methods[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2023(1): 40-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	解艳玲, 陈萍, 卜建华. 不同灌水及施肥方式对苜蓿生长的影响研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2019, 60(8): 10-14.
	XIE Y L, CHEN P, BU J H. The study of effects of different irrigation and fertilization methods on the growth and yield of alfalfa[J]. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 60(8): 10-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	赵瑞芬, 程滨, 郑普山, 等. 不同灌水量对吕梁山区微灌核桃生长特性、耗水规律和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(7): 110-117.
	ZHAO R F, CHENG B, ZHENG P S, et al. Effects of different irrigation amounts on growth characteristics, water consumption laws and yield of walnut in Lüliang Mountain[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(7): 110-117. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	潘新雅, 李军保, 陈阳, 等. 6个紫花苜蓿品种根系形态结构对低磷胁迫的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2494-2504.
	PAN X Y, LI J B, CHEN Y, et al. Response of root morphology and anatomical structure of six alfalfa cultivars to phosphorus deficiency[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2494-2504. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	吴龙龙, 田仓, 张露, 等. 稻田水氮氧环境因子对水稻生长发育、光合作用和氮利用的调控研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1498-1508.
	WU L L, TIAN C, ZHANG L, et al. Research advance in the roles of water-nitrogen-oxygen factors in mediating rice growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen utilization in paddy soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4): 1498-1508. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	柳佳, 罗永忠, 陈国鹏. 土壤水分胁迫对新疆大叶苜蓿构件生物量分配的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(3): 639-644.
	LIU J, LUO Y Z, CHEN G P. Effects of soil moisture stress on biomass allocation of Medicago sativa cv. Xinjiangdaye[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(3): 639-644. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 等. 高寒地区燕麦与豌豆不同混播组合和比例对饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 487-494.
	FENG T X, DE K J, XIANG X M, et al. Effects of different mixtures and proportions of Avena sativa and pea on forage yield and quality in alpine cold region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 487-494. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	张春雨, 白晶, 丁相鹏, 等. 错株增密种植对夏玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3928-3941.
	ZHANG C Y, BAI J, DING X P, et al. Effects of staggered planting with increased density on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 3928-3941. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	王彦华, 王成章, 李德锋, 等. 播种量和品种对紫花苜蓿植株动态变化、产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 123-135.
	WANG Y H, WANG C Z, LI D F, et al. Effects of seeding rate on plant number, production performance, and quality of alfalfa[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(2): 123-135. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 等. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27-38.
	CAI L, WANG L L, LUO Z Z, et al. Meta-analysis of alfalfa yield and WUE response to growing ages in China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 27-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	HUANG Z, LIU Y, CUI Z, et al. Soil water storage deficit of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) grasslands along ages in arid area (China)[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 221: 1-6.

调亏灌溉对苜蓿产量品质效应的荟萃分析

Meta-analysis of effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of alfalfa

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱学慧, 谢辉, 韩守安, 王敏, 白世践, 马云龙, 王艳蒙, 麦斯乐, 潘明启, 张雯. 两种植物生长调节剂对无核白鸡心葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1309-1319.
[2]	赵黎明, 王亚新, 蒋文鑫, 段绍彪, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰. 植物生长调节剂对优质粳稻产量、品质与光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014.
[3]	高虎, 穆晓国, 李海俊, 高富成, 张莹, 李建设, 叶林. 粉垄耕作对坝地土壤特性及甘蓝产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1113-1123.
[4]	陈俊霖, 蒋娜, 刘鑫, 卓红, 田昌, 韩永亮, 张玉平, 荣湘民. 控释氮肥减量对作物产量、氮素吸收与径流损失的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 846-858.
[5]	汪颖, 王尖, 冯子珊, 汪宝根, 吴新义, 鲁忠富, 孙玉燕, 董文其, 李国景, 吴晓花. 瓠瓜果实品质性状因子分析和综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 334-343.
[6]	罗莎莎, 王如月, 甄紫怡, 吴嘉龙, 徐业勇, 巴合提牙儿·克热木, 孙雅丽, 虎海防. 灌溉时间和灌溉量对杏李裂果率与果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 365-372.
[7]	张玥, 陈慧, 郑雅丹, 杨鹏, 柯志刚, 戴央章, 金友定, 丁玉庭, 刘书来. 贻贝糟制过程中的品质变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 416-423.
[8]	刘智成, 严良文, 陈瑶瑶, 欧雪婷. 福建地区不同栽培模式下百香果的产量与品质特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 134-147.
[9]	宗自豪, 何丁生, 牛犇, 黄俊, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 陈杭君, 郜海燕. 不同镂空包装对雨天采收杨梅贮运品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 196-204.
[10]	岳宗伟, 李嘉骁, 孙向阳, 刘国梁, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 查贵超, 魏宁娴. 化肥有机肥配施对土壤性质、樱桃果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2192-2201.
[11]	张博, 刘泽慈, 汪洁, 李兆壮, 李录山, 胡琳莉, 郁继华. 不同农业废弃物肥料化配方对露地甘蓝生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1782-1792.
[12]	张宁, 陶荣浩, 刘佩诗, 胡含秀, 高琳琳, 郭龙, 祝尊友, 马友华. 不同种类有机肥配施化肥对茶叶生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.
[13]	王迪, 杨汉梅, 李阳倩, 贾梦婷, 邹亮, 杨帆. 苦荞麦“品、质、效、用”的多维评价及其活性成分高值化利用的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1960-1974.
[14]	田玉刚, 万素梅, 林皎, 陈国栋, 李浩, 胡宇凯, 李燕芳, 胡守林, 毛廷勇, 赵书珍. 不同地膜类型与灌溉量对棉花光合参数和产量、品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1523-1531.
[15]	雷联. 膜下滴灌调亏对制种玉米植株生长、产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(7): 1542-1549.