浙江农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1898-1908.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230543
赵小亮1(
), 鲁雲1, 康兴兴1, 龙则宇1, 郑晓杰2,*(
)
收稿日期:2023-04-27
出版日期:2024-08-25
发布日期:2024-09-06
作者简介:*郑晓杰,E-mail: 852117648@qq.com通讯作者:
郑晓杰
基金资助:
ZHAO Xiaoliang1(
), LU Yun1, KANG Xingxing1, LONG Zeyu1, ZHENG Xiaojie2,*(
)
Received:2023-04-27
Online:2024-08-25
Published:2024-09-06
Contact:
ZHENG Xiaojie
摘要:
以雁荡山铁皮石斛鲜茎为材料,选取液料比、提取温度、提取时间、提取次数为因子,以铁皮石斛多糖得率为响应值,分别基于单因素试验和响应面法试验优化铁皮石斛多糖的提取工艺,通过傅里叶红外光谱和高效液相色谱法分析对其进行初步的结构表征,并对其清除自由基的活性进行研究。结果表明:雁荡山铁皮石斛多糖提取的最佳工艺条件为液料比55∶1(mL·g-1),提取温度80 ℃,提取时间130 min,提取次数2次。在此条件下,实际测得的多糖得率为31.02%。通过红外光谱分析,铁皮石斛多糖同时包含α和β型糖苷键,由甘露糖、葡萄糖醛酸、半乳糖醛酸、葡萄糖和木糖组成,其物质的量之比为1.57∶0.49∶0.99∶2.08∶1.00。铁皮石斛多糖清除1,1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼(DPPH)自由基、2,2'-联氮-双-3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸(ABTS)自由基、羟基自由基、超氧阴离子的半抑制浓度(IC50)分别为2.46、4.47、5.60、2.66 mg·mL-1,说明其具备一定的抗氧化活性。
中图分类号:
赵小亮, 鲁雲, 康兴兴, 龙则宇, 郑晓杰. 雁荡山铁皮石斛多糖的提取、结构表征与体外抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1898-1908.
ZHAO Xiaoliang, LU Yun, KANG Xingxing, LONG Zeyu, ZHENG Xiaojie. Extraction, structural characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Dendrobium officinale in Yandang Mountain, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1898-1908.
| 编码水平 Coding level | 各因素的设定值Setting values for factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM/(mL·g-1) | ET/min | ETP/℃ | ETS | |
| -1 | 30 | 60 | 50 | 1 |
| 0 | 45 | 120 | 70 | 2 |
| 1 | 60 | 180 | 90 | 3 |
表1 响应面分析的因素和水平
Table 1 Factors and levels in response surface analysis
| 编码水平 Coding level | 各因素的设定值Setting values for factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM/(mL·g-1) | ET/min | ETP/℃ | ETS | |
| -1 | 30 | 60 | 50 | 1 |
| 0 | 45 | 120 | 70 | 2 |
| 1 | 60 | 180 | 90 | 3 |
图1 液料比、提取时间、提取温度和提取次数对铁皮石斛多糖得率的影响
Fig.1 Effect of liquid-to-material ratio, extraction time, extraction temperature and extraction times on the yield of polysaccharides from Dendrobium of ficinale
| 编号 No. | 各因素的编码水平Coding levels of factor | Y/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | ||
| 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28.21 |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 26.82 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 25.31 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 24.63 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 28.26 |
| 6 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 27.86 |
| 7 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25.32 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 25.15 |
| 9 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 28.56 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 29.92 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.05 |
| 12 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 26.96 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 26.13 |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27.29 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.76 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.02 |
| 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 26.86 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31.13 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.45 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 29.80 |
| 21 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 24.09 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.86 |
| 23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 26.96 |
| 24 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 27.21 |
| 25 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 24.65 |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 28.16 |
| 27 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 26.36 |
| 28 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27.15 |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27.86 |
表2 响应面试验设计与结果
Table 2 Design and results of response surface experiment
| 编号 No. | 各因素的编码水平Coding levels of factor | Y/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | ||
| 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28.21 |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 26.82 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 25.31 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 24.63 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 28.26 |
| 6 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 27.86 |
| 7 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 25.32 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 25.15 |
| 9 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 28.56 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 29.92 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.05 |
| 12 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 26.96 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 26.13 |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27.29 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.76 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.02 |
| 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 26.86 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31.13 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.45 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 29.80 |
| 21 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 24.09 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.86 |
| 23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 26.96 |
| 24 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 27.21 |
| 25 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 24.65 |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 28.16 |
| 27 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 26.36 |
| 28 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27.15 |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27.86 |
| 来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 127.03 | 9.07 | 66.30 | <0.000 1 |
| X1 | 2.31 | 2.31 | 16.91 | 0.001 1 |
| X2 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 2.58 | 0.130 3 |
| X3 | 57.99 | 57.99 | 423.77 | <0.000 1 |
| X4 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 2.32 | 0.150 4 |
| X1X2 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 1.61 | 0.224 6 |
| X1X3 | 3.88 | 3.88 | 28.36 | 0.000 1 |
| X1X4 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 8.44 | 0.011 5 |
| X2X3 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 4.22 | 0.059 1 |
| X2X4 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.0029 | 0.957 6 |
| X3X4 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.2923 | 0.597 3 |
| 16.78 | 16.78 | 122.58 | <0.000 1 | |
| 35.05 | 35.05 | 256.09 | <0.000 1 | |
| 24.40 | 24.40 | 178.28 | <0.000 1 | |
| 15.85 | 15.85 | 115.82 | <0.000 1 | |
| 残差Residual | 1.92 | 0.14 | — | — |
| 失拟项Lack of Fit | 1.68 | 0.17 | 2.87 | 0.161 0 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.23 | 0.06 | — | — |
表3 回归模型的方差分析结果
Table 3 Analysis of variance of regression model
| 来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 127.03 | 9.07 | 66.30 | <0.000 1 |
| X1 | 2.31 | 2.31 | 16.91 | 0.001 1 |
| X2 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 2.58 | 0.130 3 |
| X3 | 57.99 | 57.99 | 423.77 | <0.000 1 |
| X4 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 2.32 | 0.150 4 |
| X1X2 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 1.61 | 0.224 6 |
| X1X3 | 3.88 | 3.88 | 28.36 | 0.000 1 |
| X1X4 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 8.44 | 0.011 5 |
| X2X3 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 4.22 | 0.059 1 |
| X2X4 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.0029 | 0.957 6 |
| X3X4 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.2923 | 0.597 3 |
| 16.78 | 16.78 | 122.58 | <0.000 1 | |
| 35.05 | 35.05 | 256.09 | <0.000 1 | |
| 24.40 | 24.40 | 178.28 | <0.000 1 | |
| 15.85 | 15.85 | 115.82 | <0.000 1 | |
| 残差Residual | 1.92 | 0.14 | — | — |
| 失拟项Lack of Fit | 1.68 | 0.17 | 2.87 | 0.161 0 |
| 纯误差Pure error | 0.23 | 0.06 | — | — |
图2 各因素相互作用对铁皮石斛多糖得率的响应面图和等高线图
Fig.2 Response surface and contour plots of the interaction of various factors to the polysaccharide yield of Dendrobium officinale
图5 单糖混合标准溶液(左)与铁皮石斛多糖水解液(右)的液相色谱图 1~9分别代表甘露糖、鼠李糖、葡萄糖醛酸、半乳糖醛酸、葡萄糖、半乳糖、木糖、阿拉伯糖、岩藻糖。
Fig.5 Liquid chromatograms of the mixed standard solution of monosaccharides and the polysaccharide hydrolysate of Dendrobium officinale 1-9 represent mannose, rhamnose, glucuronic acid, galacturonic acid, glucose, galactose, xylose, arabinose, fucose, respectively.
| [1] | 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:二部[M]. 2020年版. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 92-93. |
| [2] | LIU Y J, MO X L, TANG X Z, et al. Extraction optimization, characterization, and bioactivities of polysaccharides from pinelliae rhizoma praeparatum cum alumine employing ultrasound-assisted extraction[J]. Molecules, 2017, 22(6): 965. |
| [3] | 李玲, 邓晓兰, 赵兴兵, 等. 铁皮石斛化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 肿瘤药学, 2011, 1(2): 90-94. |
| LI L, DENG X L, ZHAO X B, et al. Advances in studies on chemical constituents in Dendrobium candidum and their pharmacological effects[J]. Anti-Tumor Pharmacy, 2011, 1(2): 90-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 陈利华, 王欣, 成家杨. 不同方法提取海洋硅藻粗多糖的比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(2): 280-289. |
| CHEN L H, WANG X, CHENG J Y. Comparison of crude polysaccharides extraction from marine diatom under different methods[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(2): 280-289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 张华, 夏占强, 叶萍, 等. 紫外分光光度法快速测定纤维蛋白粘合剂中蛋白质含量[J]. 亚太传统医药, 2012, 8(8): 38-40. |
| ZHANG H, XIA Z Q, YE P, et al. Rapid determination of content in the the protein of porcine fibrin sealant kit by UV spectrophotometric[J]. Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine, 2012, 8(8): 38-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | DOU J, MENG Y H, LIU L, et al. Purification, characterization and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from thinned-young apple[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2015, 72: 31-40. |
| [7] | SPADONI ANDREANI E, KARBOUNE S, LIU L. Extraction and characterization of cell wall polysaccharides from cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon var. stevens) pomace[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021, 267: 118212. |
| [8] | 柳菁菁, 施松善, 张彬锋, 等. 维药胡桐泪的多糖含量测定及其糖组成分析[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2022, 31(12): 31-37. |
| LIU J J, SHI S S, ZHANG B F, et al. Polysaccharide contents determination and monosaccharide composition analysis of uygur medicine Populus euphratica resins[J]. Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy, 2022, 31(12): 31-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 祝元婷, 吴文林, 张利, 等. 超声提取鼠尾草叶多糖工艺优化及其DPPH自由基清除能力评价[J]. 食品科学, 2011, 32(16): 76-79. |
| ZHU Y T, WU W L, ZHANG L, et al. Optimization of ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from Salvia officinalis L. leaves and their DPPH free radical scavenging activity[J]. Food Science, 2011, 32(16): 76-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | LUAN F, JI Y F, PENG L X, et al. Extraction, purification, structural characteristics and biological properties of the polysaccharides from Codonopsis pilosula: a review[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021, 261: 117863. |
| [11] | 郑晓杰, 李彦坡, 周环, 等. 一种超高压辅助水提取铁皮石斛多糖的方法: CN112300296A[P]. 2021-02-02. |
| [12] | 吴飞鹏, 蔡继业, 马淑媛, 等. 壳聚糖对超氧自由基的清除作用[J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2008, 24(8): 124-127. |
| WU F P, CAI J Y, MA S Y, et al. Scavenging activities of superoxide radical by chitosan[J]. Polymer Materials Science & Engineering, 2008, 24(8): 124-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | WANG L B, LIU F C, WANG A X, et al. Purification, characterization and bioactivity determination of a novel polysaccharide from pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) seeds[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2017, 66: 357-364. |
| [14] | QIN L, HE M J, YANG Y J, et al. Anticoagulant-active sulfated arabinogalactan from Chaetomorpha linum: structural characterization and action on coagulation factors[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 242: 116394. |
| [15] | CHEN Y, YIN L Y, ZHANG X J, et al. Optimization of alkaline extraction and bioactivities of polysaccharides from rhizome of Polygonatum odoratum[J]. BioMed Research International, 2014, 2014: 504896. |
| [16] | 柴美灵, 李娜, 乔宏萍, 等. Box-Behnken法优化甘草多糖提取工艺及其体外抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(23): 192-200. |
| CHAI M L, LI N, QIAO H P, et al. Application of box-Behnken design for ultrasonic-assisted extraction of Glycyrrhiza polysaccharide and its antioxidant activity analysis in vitro[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(23): 192-200. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 加列西·马那甫, 马福东, 陈锐. 响应面法优化牛蒡根多糖的提取工艺及含量预测[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2022, 57(20): 1703-1709. |
| MANAFU J, MA F D, CHEN R. Optimization of extraction process of polysaccharide from burdock root by response surface methodology and its content prediction[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2022, 57(20): 1703-1709. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | MA J S, LIU H, HAN C R, et al. Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Pouteria campechiana seed[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 229: 115409. |
| [19] | LIU X, HOU R L, XU K Q, et al. Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activity analysis of the polysaccharide from the solid-state fermentation substrate of Inonotus hispidus[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 123: 468-476. |
| [20] | 任玉珊, 李倩, 王贞香, 等. 响应面法优化双水相提取野生山楂叶茶中多糖及其含量测定[J]. 兰州大学学报(医学版), 2020, 46(6): 83-91. |
| REN Y S, LI Q, WANG Z X, et al. Response surface methodology for optimizing aqueous two-phase extraction of polysaccharides from wild hawthorn leaf tea and its content determination[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(Medical Sciences), 2020, 46(6): 83-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 邱现创, 赵宁, 李晨, 等. 铁皮石斛多糖提取工艺优化及对果蝇抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(2): 273-280. |
| QIU X C, ZHAO N, LI C, et al. Optimization of extraction of polysaccharide from Dendrobium officinale and its antioxidant effect on Drosophila melanogaster[J]. Food Science, 2018, 39(2): 273-280. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 陈琳, 顾青. 柳叶蜡梅多糖对大鼠急性胃黏膜损伤的保护机制研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1009-1016. |
| [2] | 朱潇, 朱颖, 李宏军, 陈善峰. 挤压制备燕麦鹰嘴豆复配米的工艺优化及其品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1149-1158. |
| [3] | 朱媛媛, 韩延超, 刘瑞玲, 邓尚贵, 陈慧芝, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 郜海燕. 蟹风味香肠的工艺优化与品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 920-933. |
| [4] | 孙凤婷, 王旭, 韩新雨, 许振岚, 吴声敢, 黄浩, 汤涛, 盛清, 王强, 沈国强, 赵学平. 复硝酚钠对铁皮石斛中黄酮含量和抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 934-942. |
| [5] | 乔慧茹, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 刘瑞玲, 陈杭君, 邓尚贵, 沙浩, 郜海燕. 蓝莓与铁皮石斛叶复合乳酸菌发酵饮料工艺优化与品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 654-666. |
| [6] | 黄浩, 汤涛, 许振岚, 赵学平. 吡唑醚菌酯对铁皮石斛中多糖和黄酮的影响研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 115-125. |
| [7] | 张妮, 陶文扬, 罗梦帆, 周万怡, 郑晓杰, 李彦坡, 金火喜, 杨颖. 酶解辅助提取对铁皮石斛多糖结构和菌群调节功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2099-2109. |
| [8] | 诸燕, 丁兰, 陈忆乾, 黄秀静, 姜伟伟, 陈东红. 铁皮石斛CLE基因家族鉴定与功能分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1583-1590. |
| [9] | 王晓梅, 骆玉琴, 赵学平, 陆兰菲, 方楠, 王祥云, 蒋金花, 何红梅, 张昌朋, 王强. 氟吡菌酰胺在铁皮石斛中的残留与膳食风险[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1666-1676. |
| [10] | 曹乃馨, 罗阳兰, 阎勇, 解修超, 张雯龙. 桑树桑黄JM-1胞外多糖液态培养基优化及其抗氧化性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1245-1255. |
| [11] | 刘晨星, 曹艳, 夏其乐. 多花黄精根须皂苷的提取工艺及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1144-1152. |
| [12] | 李亚萍, 金福来, 黄宗贵, 张涛, 段晓婧, 姜武, 陶正明, 陈家栋. 铁皮石斛糖苷水解酶GH3基因家族鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 790-799. |
| [13] | 邵雪, 牛犇, 房祥军, 吴伟杰, 吴来春, 郜海燕, 陈杭君. 方便粥的干燥方式优选与风味优化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 894-904. |
| [14] | 杨紫瀚, 吴伟杰, 高原, 刘瑞玲, 申屠旭萍, 郜海燕, 陈杭君. 莲藕解酒功能软糖的制备及功效评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 404-415. |
| [15] | 吕国英, 王梦雨, 张作法. 猴头菇多糖对小鼠肠道菌群的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2794-2802. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||