浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 115-125.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240296
收稿日期:
2024-03-28
出版日期:
2025-01-25
发布日期:
2025-02-14
作者简介:
黄浩(1999—),男,湖北天门人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为农产品质量与安全。E-mail:hwang1217@126.com
通讯作者:
*赵学平,E-mail:zhaoxueping@tom.com
基金资助:
HUANG Hao1,2(), TANG Tao2, XU Zhenlan2, ZHAO Xueping2,*(
)
Received:
2024-03-28
Online:
2025-01-25
Published:
2025-02-14
摘要: 本文研究了吡唑醚菌酯在铁皮石斛中的残留动态及其对多糖和黄酮含量的影响,并采用代谢组学探讨了吡唑醚菌酯对铁皮石斛多糖和黄酮含量影响的潜在机制。结果表明:末次施药后7 d,LC(推荐剂量处理)和HC(高剂量处理)组多糖含量相较BC(空白对照)组下降31%和38%(P<0.01),7~15 d回升至无显著差异直至采样结束;0~15 d,3组黄酮含量差异不显著,30~90 d,LC和HC组黄酮含量显著高于BC组,60 d差异最显著,分别升高31%和34%(P<0.01)。末次施药后7 d,LC和HC相较BC组多种代谢物含量显著上升,苯丙氨酸含量上升100%和70%(P<0.05),酪氨酸含量上升120%和97%(P<0.05),苯丙氨酸、酪氨酸和色氨酸合成,氮代谢等代谢通路显著上调;60 d,LC组相较BC组,根皮素含量、木犀草素含量、7-O-甲基圣草酚含量下调66%、18%和89%(P<0.05),黄酮和黄酮醇的生物合成与苯丙氨酸生物合成代谢通路显著下调,HC组与BC组间未出现差异富集代谢通路。结合残留动态推测,末次施药后7 d,LC和HC组铁皮石斛通过提升氨基酸浓度提高了铁皮石斛对吡唑醚菌酯胁迫的抗性,苯丙氨酸等黄酮前体物质含量的上升也促进了黄酮的合成;60 d LC组铁皮石斛应激反应逐渐减弱,HC组为应对较高浓度的吡唑醚菌酯残留,保持着较高的应激反应强度。7 d LC和HC组铁皮石斛可能促进多糖分解为可溶性糖以调节植株渗透压,从而降低了多糖含量。该研究结果可为铁皮石斛种植过程中的吡唑醚菌酯合理施用提供依据。
中图分类号:
黄浩, 汤涛, 许振岚, 赵学平. 吡唑醚菌酯对铁皮石斛中多糖和黄酮的影响研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
HUANG Hao, TANG Tao, XU Zhenlan, ZHAO Xueping. Effects of pyraclostrobin on polysaccharide and flavone in Dendrobium officinale[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
添加浓度 Additive concentration/ (mg·L-1) | 平均添加回收率 Average recovery | 相对标准偏差 RSD |
---|---|---|
0.001 | 117.6 | 10.1 |
0.01 | 108.1 | 5.7 |
0.1 | 106.2 | 4.7 |
表1 吡唑醚菌酯在铁皮石斛中的平均回收率及相对标准偏差
Table 1 Average recovery and relative standard deviation (RSD) of pyraclostrobin in Dendrobium officinale matrix %
添加浓度 Additive concentration/ (mg·L-1) | 平均添加回收率 Average recovery | 相对标准偏差 RSD |
---|---|---|
0.001 | 117.6 | 10.1 |
0.01 | 108.1 | 5.7 |
0.1 | 106.2 | 4.7 |
采样时间 Sampling time/d | LC | HC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
残留量 Residual concentration/(mg·kg-1) | 消解率 Digestion rate/% | 残留量 Residual concentration/(mg·kg-1) | 消解率 Digestion rate/% | |
0 | 5.07±0.88 | — | 10.05±1.56 | — |
7 | 3.83±0.72 | 24 | 7.74±1.16 | 23 |
15 | 3.64±0.56 | 28 | 7.02±0.88 | 30 |
30 | 3.44±0.45 | 32 | 6.24±0.94 | 38 |
60 | 2.53±0.39 | 50 | 5.27±0.8 | 48 |
90 | 1.87±0.37 | 63 | 4.05±0.64 | 60 |
表2 吡唑醚菌酯在铁皮石斛中的残留量和消解率
Table 2 Residue and digestion rate of pyraclostrobin in Dendrobium officinale samples
采样时间 Sampling time/d | LC | HC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
残留量 Residual concentration/(mg·kg-1) | 消解率 Digestion rate/% | 残留量 Residual concentration/(mg·kg-1) | 消解率 Digestion rate/% | |
0 | 5.07±0.88 | — | 10.05±1.56 | — |
7 | 3.83±0.72 | 24 | 7.74±1.16 | 23 |
15 | 3.64±0.56 | 28 | 7.02±0.88 | 30 |
30 | 3.44±0.45 | 32 | 6.24±0.94 | 38 |
60 | 2.53±0.39 | 50 | 5.27±0.8 | 48 |
90 | 1.87±0.37 | 63 | 4.05±0.64 | 60 |
编号No. | 化合物Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | R-芳樟基β-葡萄糖苷R-cinnamyl β-glucoside | 3.30 | 3.69 | 3.65×10-2 |
2 | 9-氧代十八碳-1012-二烯酸9-oxooctadecane-1012-dienoic acid | 3.05 | 4.10 | 4.83×10-2 |
3 | 谷氨酰胺Glutamine | 2.84 | 3.84 | 2.04×10-2 |
4 | L-谷胱甘肽(氧化形式)L-Glutathione (oxidized form) | 2.69 | 3.05 | 3.20×10-2 |
5 | 酪氨酸Tyrosine | 2.35 | 2.20 | 4.07×10-2 |
6 | 色氨酸Tryptophan | 2.01 | 1.65 | 2.69×10-2 |
7 | 苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine | 1.91 | 2.00 | 3.59×10-2 |
8 | 天冬酰胺Asparagine | 1.82 | 7.55 | 2.36×10-2 |
9 | L-异亮氨酸L-isoleucine | 1.70 | 3.42 | 2.53×10-2 |
10 | 苯甲醛Benzaldehyde | 1.68 | 0.76 | 7.61×10-3 |
11 | (6β,22E)-6-羟基豆甾-4,22-二烯-3-酮(6 β, 22E)-6-Hydroxystigmastan-4,22-dien-3-one | 1.36 | 2.25 | 3.90×10-2 |
12 | 尿苷Uridine | 1.33 | 2.61 | 3.83×10-3 |
13 | DL-异亮氨酸DL-isoleucine | 1.28 | 5.74 | 2.02×10-3 |
14 | 组氨酸Histidine | 1.27 | 2.82 | 9.79×10-3 |
15 | L-焦谷氨酸L-pyroglutamic acid | 1.26 | 2.66 | 4.45×10-2 |
16 | N-环己基甲酰胺N-cyclohexylformamide | 1.26 | 0.79 | 3.88×10-2 |
17 | 哌啶Piperidine | 1.21 | 5.24 | 2.38×10-3 |
18 | 叶黄Xanthophyll | 1.18 | 2.74 | 2.23×10-2 |
19 | 谷氨酰胺类似物,1 Glutamine analogues, 1 | 1.15 | 4.06 | 8.78×10-3 |
表3 末次施药后7 d时LC组与BC组间差异代谢物
Table 3 Metabolites of difference between LC group and BC group on the 7th day after the last application
编号No. | 化合物Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | R-芳樟基β-葡萄糖苷R-cinnamyl β-glucoside | 3.30 | 3.69 | 3.65×10-2 |
2 | 9-氧代十八碳-1012-二烯酸9-oxooctadecane-1012-dienoic acid | 3.05 | 4.10 | 4.83×10-2 |
3 | 谷氨酰胺Glutamine | 2.84 | 3.84 | 2.04×10-2 |
4 | L-谷胱甘肽(氧化形式)L-Glutathione (oxidized form) | 2.69 | 3.05 | 3.20×10-2 |
5 | 酪氨酸Tyrosine | 2.35 | 2.20 | 4.07×10-2 |
6 | 色氨酸Tryptophan | 2.01 | 1.65 | 2.69×10-2 |
7 | 苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine | 1.91 | 2.00 | 3.59×10-2 |
8 | 天冬酰胺Asparagine | 1.82 | 7.55 | 2.36×10-2 |
9 | L-异亮氨酸L-isoleucine | 1.70 | 3.42 | 2.53×10-2 |
10 | 苯甲醛Benzaldehyde | 1.68 | 0.76 | 7.61×10-3 |
11 | (6β,22E)-6-羟基豆甾-4,22-二烯-3-酮(6 β, 22E)-6-Hydroxystigmastan-4,22-dien-3-one | 1.36 | 2.25 | 3.90×10-2 |
12 | 尿苷Uridine | 1.33 | 2.61 | 3.83×10-3 |
13 | DL-异亮氨酸DL-isoleucine | 1.28 | 5.74 | 2.02×10-3 |
14 | 组氨酸Histidine | 1.27 | 2.82 | 9.79×10-3 |
15 | L-焦谷氨酸L-pyroglutamic acid | 1.26 | 2.66 | 4.45×10-2 |
16 | N-环己基甲酰胺N-cyclohexylformamide | 1.26 | 0.79 | 3.88×10-2 |
17 | 哌啶Piperidine | 1.21 | 5.24 | 2.38×10-3 |
18 | 叶黄Xanthophyll | 1.18 | 2.74 | 2.23×10-2 |
19 | 谷氨酰胺类似物,1 Glutamine analogues, 1 | 1.15 | 4.06 | 8.78×10-3 |
编号No. | 化合物Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 蔗糖Sucrose | 5.89 | 2.68 | 4.03×10-2 |
2 | Hydron;2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylate | 2.69 | 2.49 | 1.79×10-2 |
3 | 谷氨酰胺Glutamine | 2.65 | 3.23 | 1.16×10-2 |
4 | (4-羟基-3,5-二甲氧基苯基)甲基-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷 | 2.41 | 2.25 | 4.88×10-2 |
(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl) methyl-β-D-glucopyranoside | ||||
5 | 酪氨酸Tyrosine | 2.29 | 1.97 | 2.4×10-3 |
6 | 色氨酸Tryptophan | 1.98 | 1.77 | 3.94×10-2 |
7 | R-芳樟基β-葡萄糖苷R-cinnamyl β-glucoside | 1.64 | 3.63 | 3.32×10-2 |
8 | 苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine | 1.33 | 1.70 | 3.27×10-2 |
9 | 叶黄Xanthophyll | 1.21 | 2.33 | 3.84×10-2 |
10 | 2-糠酸2-Furoic acid | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.82×10-2 |
11 | 葡萄糖Glucose | 1.13 | 1.71 | 3.87×10-2 |
12 | 91213-Trihydroxyoctadeca-1015-dienoic acid | 1.12 | 3.53 | 4.3×10-3 |
13 | 焦谷氨酸Pyroglutamic acid | 1.12 | 2.49 | 1.06×10-2 |
表4 末次施药后7 d时HC组与BC组间差异代谢物
Table 4 Metabolites of difference between HC group and BC group on the 7th day after the last application
编号No. | 化合物Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 蔗糖Sucrose | 5.89 | 2.68 | 4.03×10-2 |
2 | Hydron;2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylate | 2.69 | 2.49 | 1.79×10-2 |
3 | 谷氨酰胺Glutamine | 2.65 | 3.23 | 1.16×10-2 |
4 | (4-羟基-3,5-二甲氧基苯基)甲基-β-D-吡喃葡萄糖苷 | 2.41 | 2.25 | 4.88×10-2 |
(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl) methyl-β-D-glucopyranoside | ||||
5 | 酪氨酸Tyrosine | 2.29 | 1.97 | 2.4×10-3 |
6 | 色氨酸Tryptophan | 1.98 | 1.77 | 3.94×10-2 |
7 | R-芳樟基β-葡萄糖苷R-cinnamyl β-glucoside | 1.64 | 3.63 | 3.32×10-2 |
8 | 苯丙氨酸Phenylalanine | 1.33 | 1.70 | 3.27×10-2 |
9 | 叶黄Xanthophyll | 1.21 | 2.33 | 3.84×10-2 |
10 | 2-糠酸2-Furoic acid | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.82×10-2 |
11 | 葡萄糖Glucose | 1.13 | 1.71 | 3.87×10-2 |
12 | 91213-Trihydroxyoctadeca-1015-dienoic acid | 1.12 | 3.53 | 4.3×10-3 |
13 | 焦谷氨酸Pyroglutamic acid | 1.12 | 2.49 | 1.06×10-2 |
编号No. | 化合物Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 根皮素Phloretin | 2.99 | 0.34 | 3.26×10-2 |
2 | 芥子碱Sinapine | 2.61 | 0.18 | 1.42×10-2 |
3 | 莽草酸Shikimic acid | 2.52 | 0.22 | 5.94×10-3 |
4 | 2',4',6'-三羟基二氢查耳酮2', 4', 6'-trihydroxydihydrochalcone | 1.61 | 0.25 | 4.77×10-2 |
5 | 2'-羟基-4,4',6'-三甲氧基查耳酮2'-hydroxy-4,4', 6'-trimethoxychalcone | 1.49 | 0.47 | 5.8×10-3 |
6 | 异丹叶大黄素Isorhapontigenin | 1.42 | 0.23 | 4.88×10-3 |
7 | 木犀草Luteolin | 1.41 | 0.82 | 2.27×10-2 |
8 | NΩ-单甲基-L-精氨酸乙酸盐NΩ-Monomethyl-L-arginine Acetate | 1.38 | 0.19 | 4.30×10-2 |
9 | 3-(2,4-二羟基苯基)-7-羟基-6,8-双(3-甲基丁-2-烯基)-2,3-二氢罗马烯-4-酮 | 1.35 | 4.19 | 1.87×10-3 |
3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-hydroxy-6,8-bis (3-methylbut-2-enyl)-2,3-dihydroRomane-4-one | ||||
10 | 茶碱Theophylline | 1.31 | 0.22 | 3.57×10-2 |
11 | 7-O-甲基圣草酚7-O-methylcatechol | 1.26 | 0.11 | 1.53×10-2 |
12 | 2-巯基苯并噻唑2-Mercaptobenzothiazole | 1.15 | 1.62 | 4.63×10-2 |
表5 60 d时LC组与BC组间差异代谢物
Table 5 Metabolites of difference between LC group and BC group on the 60th day
编号No. | 化合物Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 根皮素Phloretin | 2.99 | 0.34 | 3.26×10-2 |
2 | 芥子碱Sinapine | 2.61 | 0.18 | 1.42×10-2 |
3 | 莽草酸Shikimic acid | 2.52 | 0.22 | 5.94×10-3 |
4 | 2',4',6'-三羟基二氢查耳酮2', 4', 6'-trihydroxydihydrochalcone | 1.61 | 0.25 | 4.77×10-2 |
5 | 2'-羟基-4,4',6'-三甲氧基查耳酮2'-hydroxy-4,4', 6'-trimethoxychalcone | 1.49 | 0.47 | 5.8×10-3 |
6 | 异丹叶大黄素Isorhapontigenin | 1.42 | 0.23 | 4.88×10-3 |
7 | 木犀草Luteolin | 1.41 | 0.82 | 2.27×10-2 |
8 | NΩ-单甲基-L-精氨酸乙酸盐NΩ-Monomethyl-L-arginine Acetate | 1.38 | 0.19 | 4.30×10-2 |
9 | 3-(2,4-二羟基苯基)-7-羟基-6,8-双(3-甲基丁-2-烯基)-2,3-二氢罗马烯-4-酮 | 1.35 | 4.19 | 1.87×10-3 |
3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7-hydroxy-6,8-bis (3-methylbut-2-enyl)-2,3-dihydroRomane-4-one | ||||
10 | 茶碱Theophylline | 1.31 | 0.22 | 3.57×10-2 |
11 | 7-O-甲基圣草酚7-O-methylcatechol | 1.26 | 0.11 | 1.53×10-2 |
12 | 2-巯基苯并噻唑2-Mercaptobenzothiazole | 1.15 | 1.62 | 4.63×10-2 |
编号 No. | 化合物 Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 芥子碱Sinapine | 2.33 | 0.09 | 3.49×103 |
表6 60 d时HC组与BC组间差异代谢物
Table 6 Metabolites of difference between HC group and BC group on the 60th day
编号 No. | 化合物 Compound | VIP | Fold change | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 芥子碱Sinapine | 2.33 | 0.09 | 3.49×103 |
[1] | 国家卫生健康委员会. 关于对党参等9种物质开展按照传统既是食品又是中药材的物质管理试点工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-01-06) [2024-03-27]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/sps/s7885/202001/1ec2cca04146450d9b14acc2499d854f.shtml |
[2] | 张雪琴, 赵庭梅, 刘静, 等. 石斛化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2018, 49(13): 3174-3182. |
ZHANG X Q, ZHAO T M, LIU J, et al. Advances in chemical compounds and pharmacological effects of Dendrobii caulis[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2018, 49(13): 3174-3182. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | LIN T, CHEN X L, WANG J, et al. Application of time of flight mass spectrometry in the identification of Dendrobium devonianum paxt and Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo grown in Longling area of Yunnan, China[J]. Separations, 2022, 9(5): 108. |
[4] | ZHANG K, ZHOU X T, WANG J Q, et al. Dendrobium officinale polysaccharide triggers mitochondrial disorder to induce colon cancer cell death via ROS-AMPK-autophagy pathway[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021, 264: 118018. |
[5] | TANG H X, ZHAO T W, SHENG Y J, et al. Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo: a review on its ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and industrialization[J]. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2017, 2017: 7436259. |
[6] | 邱道寿, 刘晓津, 郑锦荣, 等. 棚栽铁皮石斛的主要病害及其防治[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011(S1): 118-120. |
QIU D S, LIU X J, ZHENG J R, et al. The main diseases of Dendrobium officinale and their control in greenhouse[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2011(S1): 118-120. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王鹏思. 金银花和铁皮石斛上农药残留状况调研及风险评估研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2019. |
WANG P S. Investigation and risk assessment of pesticide residues on honeysuckle and Dendrobium candidum[D]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 李小青. 化学农药对青菜及其根际微环境的影响机制研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2021. |
LI X Q. Study on the influence mechanism of chemical pesticides on chinese cabbage and its rhizosphere microenvironment[D]. Guilin: Guilin University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 吕朝耕. “膨大剂”对根与根茎类中药材质量影响[D]. 北京: 中国中医科学院, 2021. |
LYU C G. Effect of “swelling agent” on that quality of root and rhizome Chinese herbal medicines[D]. Beijing: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 李瑞瑆. 麦冬中农药残留风险评估及多效唑对其品质影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020. |
LI R X. Risk assessment of pesticide residues in ophiopogon japonicus and study on the effect of paclobutrazol on its quality[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | MESARA S N, DAVE K P, SUBRAMANIAN R B. Comparative transcriptome analysis elucidates positive physiological effects of foliar application of pyraclostrobin on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2022, 28(5): 971-986. |
[12] | 段媛媛, 吴佳奇, 王帆帆, 等. 不同药剂浸种处理对苍术生长及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(23): 53-56, 64. |
DUAN Y Y, WU J Q, WANG F F, et al. Effects of seed soaking with different chemicals on growth and yield of Atractylodes lancea[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(23): 53-56, 64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 张媛媛, 张彬. 苯酚-硫酸法与蒽酮-硫酸法测定绿茶茶多糖的比较研究[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(4): 158-163. |
ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG B. Comparison of phenol-sulfuric acid and anthrone-sulfuric methods for determination of polysaccharide in green tea[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(4): 158-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 王丽丽, 林清霞, 宋振硕, 等. 分光光度法测定茶叶中总黄酮含量[J]. 茶叶学报, 2021, 62(1): 1-6. |
WANG L L, LIN Q X, SONG Z S, et al. Spectrophotometric determination of total flavonoids in tea[J]. Acta Tea Sinica, 2021, 62(1): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | GU Z B, LI L, TANG S K, et al. Metabolomics reveals that crossbred dairy buffaloes are more thermotolerant than Holstein cows under chronic heat stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(49): 12889-12897. |
[16] | LUO D, DENG T T, YUAN W, et al. Plasma metabolomic study in Chinese patients with wet age-related macular degeneration[J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 2017, 17(1): 165. |
[17] | 林江波, 王伟英, 邹晖, 等. 基于转录组测序的铁皮石斛黄酮代谢途径及相关基因解析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(9): 1019-1025. |
LIN J B, WANG W Y, ZOU H, et al. Transcriptome analysis on pathway of and genes related to flavonoid synthesis in Dendrobium officinale[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(9): 1019-1025. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | LIU Y H, LV J H, LIU Z B, et al. Integrative analysis of metabolome and transcriptome reveals the mechanism of color formation in pepper fruit (Capsicum annuum L.)[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 306: 125629. |
[19] | JENDRESEN C B, STAHLHUT S G, LI M J, et al. Highly active and specific tyrosine ammonia-lyases from diverse origins enable enhanced production of aromatic compounds in bacteria and Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 81(13): 4458-4476. |
[20] | 林春草, 陈大伟, 戴均贵. 黄酮类化合物合成生物学研究进展[J]. 药学学报, 2022, 57(5): 1322-1335. |
LIN C C, CHEN D W, DAI J G. Advances of synthetic biology of flavonoids[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2022, 57(5): 1322-1335. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 张明霞. 基于代谢组学技术研究毒死蜱对水稻植株及根际微环境的影响机制[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2022. |
ZHANG M X. Effects of chlorpyrifos on rice plants and rhizosphere microenvironment based on metabolomics technology[D]. Guilin: Guilin University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 刘天乐, 朱田田, 张明惠, 等. 当归活性成分生物合成与调控研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(22): 7545-7553. |
LIU T L, ZHU T T, ZHANG M H, et al. Advances in biosynthesis and regulation of active ingredients of Angelicae sinensis Radix[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2023, 54(22): 7545-7553. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李晓岗, 张雪, 俞捷, 等. 药用植物质量标志物多糖生物合成通路及关键酶研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2021, 52(15): 4752-4762. |
LI X G, ZHANG X, YU J, et al. Research progress on biosynthesis pathway of quality marker polysaccharide and involved key enzymes for medicinal plants[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2021, 52(15): 4752-4762. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 巫晓璐. 干旱胁迫与复水对细茎石斛生理及次生代谢产物的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2017. |
WU X L. Effects of drought stress and rewatering on physiology and secondary metabolites of Dendrobium moniliforme[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | WU S W, HU C X, TAN Q L, et al. Effects of molybdenum on water utilization, antioxidative defense system and osmotic-adjustment ability in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) under drought stress[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2014, 83: 365-374. |
[1] | 张妮, 陶文扬, 罗梦帆, 周万怡, 郑晓杰, 李彦坡, 金火喜, 杨颖. 酶解辅助提取对铁皮石斛多糖结构和菌群调节功能的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2099-2109. |
[2] | 展梦琪, 苏傲雪, 侯倩, 张皓宇, 姜欣蕊, 徐艳. 水稻对林丹的吸收累积与代谢组学研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2110-2121. |
[3] | 赵小亮, 鲁雲, 康兴兴, 龙则宇, 郑晓杰. 雁荡山铁皮石斛多糖的提取、结构表征与体外抗氧化活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1898-1908. |
[4] | 曾洪学, 屈兴红. 低温胁迫对3份葛种质萌发过程中脯氨酸和抗坏血酸-谷胱甘肽循环代谢的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1558-1568. |
[5] | 诸燕, 丁兰, 陈忆乾, 黄秀静, 姜伟伟, 陈东红. 铁皮石斛CLE基因家族鉴定与功能分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1583-1590. |
[6] | 王晓梅, 骆玉琴, 赵学平, 陆兰菲, 方楠, 王祥云, 蒋金花, 何红梅, 张昌朋, 王强. 氟吡菌酰胺在铁皮石斛中的残留与膳食风险[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1666-1676. |
[7] | 曹乃馨, 罗阳兰, 阎勇, 解修超, 张雯龙. 桑树桑黄JM-1胞外多糖液态培养基优化及其抗氧化性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1245-1255. |
[8] | 李亚萍, 金福来, 黄宗贵, 张涛, 段晓婧, 姜武, 陶正明, 陈家栋. 铁皮石斛糖苷水解酶GH3基因家族鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 790-799. |
[9] | 陈晓涓, 罗军, 王富敏, 李拓键, 屈燕. 全缘叶绿绒蒿黄色花形成关键基因的挖掘[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 811-824. |
[10] | 秦凯鹏, 门小明, 徐子伟. 猪肉鲜味物质及其形成机理研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(3): 719-728. |
[11] | 虎丽霞, 张婧, 高彦强, 毛尔晔, 韩康宁, 杨滟, 颉建明. 长时间镁胁迫对芹菜叶绿素荧光特性与抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 295-307. |
[12] | 刘筱琳, 孙婷婷, 杨捷, 何恒斌. 天香百合、药百合黄酮醇合成酶FLS基因克隆和表达分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(2): 344-357. |
[13] | 吕国英, 王梦雨, 张作法. 猴头菇多糖对小鼠肠道菌群的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2794-2802. |
[14] | 叶涛, 孙钦玉, 陈伟立, 单文书, 连文旭, 牛婷婷, 张家侠. 植物病原真菌bZIP基因家族研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2885-2894. |
[15] | 张旭娟, 周历萍, 俞可欣, 柴伟国, 潘念, 傅潇霞, 施建军. 绿芦笋品种间产量及主要营养成分周年变化测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(10): 2238-2246. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||