浙江沿海涂地油橄榄适生品种筛选

›› 2011, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 15-19.

浙江沿海涂地油橄榄适生品种筛选

朱申龙1,王法格2,陈开茂2,曾光辉2,傅旭军1

1浙江省农业科学院作物与核技术利用研究所, 浙江杭州 310021;2温州市农业科学研究院,浙江温州 325006

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-01-25 发布日期:2011-01-25

Selection of olive varieties suitable for cultivation on coastal land in Zhejiang Province

ZHU Shen-long;WANG Fa-ge;CHEN Kai-mao;ZENG Guang-hui;Fu Xu-jun

1Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China; 2Wenzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wenzhou 325006, China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-01-25 Published:2011-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以Moraiolo等5个油橄榄品种为试材,在浙江温州进行引种试验。结果表明,Moraiolo 6～8年生树平均单株产量21.97 kg,同龄的Frantoio平均单株产量12.57 kg,产量分别居5个参试品种前两位,田间表现树势强健、营养生长旺盛、结果早、坐果率较高,综合性状明显优于其他3个品种,显示出对试验所在地的农业气候条件良好的适应性,具有潜在的推广应用价值。而其余3个品种Leccino,Pendolino和Maurino经济性状表现不好。

关键词: 浙江, 沿海涂地, 油橄榄, 品种

Abstract: Field experiment was carried out on five olive varieties (i.e. Moraiolo, Frantoio, Leccino, Pendolino, Maurino) introduced from Italy to test their adaptability and productivity on costal land in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province. The average yield per tree of Moraiolo was 21.97 kg at the age of six to eight years, being the highest among the five varieties; the yield of Frantoio was 12.57 kg and was the second among them. The trees of Moriolo and Frantoio grew strong with good vegetative growth, early fruitage and high setting percentage compared to the other three olive varieties (Leccino, Pendolino, Maurino). Thus, the adaptability of Moraiolo and Frantoio to the tested area was better than that of the other tested varieties, which indicated that Moraiolo and Frantoio had a potential value for practical utilization. However, the economic character of Leccino, Pendolino and Maurino was not well under the tested condition．

Key words: Zhejiang, coastal land, olive, variety

朱申龙;王法格;陈开茂;曾光辉;傅旭军. 浙江沿海涂地油橄榄适生品种筛选[J]. , 2011, 23(1): 15-19.

ZHU Shen-long;WANG Fa-ge;CHEN Kai-mao;ZENG Guang-hui;Fu Xu-jun. Selection of olive varieties suitable for cultivation on coastal land in Zhejiang Province[J]. , 2011, 23(1): 15-19.

[1]	孙达, 龚恕, 崔宏春, 郭敏明, 郑旭霞. 不同品种茶树春秋季鲜叶超微绿茶粉适制性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 437-446.
[2]	孟幼青, 汪恩国, 陈吴健, 李艳敏, 程帆, 孟敏霞. 浙江省亚洲柑橘木虱黄龙病病原分布与消长规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 464-469.
[3]	谢子玉, 王可尔, 赵雯靓, 文祖会, 程林润, 徐丽珊. 不同肉色甘薯的营养成分与生物活性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 183-192.
[4]	陈丹, 汤翠凤, 董超, 甘树仙, 李俊, 阿新祥, 张斐斐, 杨雅云, 牛赛赛, 戴陆园. 云南软米地方品种籽粒淀粉品质特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 203-214.
[5]	万志前, 陈晨. 植物新品种名称保护的再思考[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1103-1111.
[6]	许连君. 行为经济学视角的农户土地流转意愿分析——以浙江农户为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 367-372.
[7]	万志前, 张媛. 实质性派生品种制度的缘起、困境与因应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2067-2076.
[8]	傅琳琳, 毛小报, 毛晓红, 李海涛, 王瑾. 浙江农业可持续发展水平与区域差异综合评价——基于高质量发展视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1880-1889.
[9]	魏庆镇, 王五宏, 胡天华, 胡海娇, 汪精磊, 包崇来. 浙茄类型茄子品种DNA指纹图谱构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(11): 1863-1870.
[10]	陈星星, 吴越, 周朝生, 陆荣茂, 曾国权, 黄振华. 浙江沿海藻类重金属含量测定及健康风险评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(6): 1029-1034.
[11]	毛亚西, 符建荣, 马军伟, 邹平, 雷廷海, 李欢, 李袁玮, 黄益孝, 王玲莉. 不同水稻品种的镉吸收特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(5): 695-701.
[12]	程远, 万红建, 刘超超, 姚祝平, 叶青静, 李志邈, 王荣青, 周国治, 杨悦俭, 陈德梁, 阮美颖. 十六个樱桃番茄品种果实风味品质相关指标比较分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11): 1859-1869.
[13]	马利奋, 尹跃, 赵建华, 王亚军, 戴国礼, 安巍. 17个枸杞品种的SCoT遗传多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 1665-1670.
[14]	周林, 郭尚, 刘欣, 刘晓刚, 郭霄飞. 山西双孢蘑菇主栽菌种的抗重金属污染能力筛选初报[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 1680-1685.
[15]	赵学观, 王秀, 李翠玲, 高原源, 王松林, 冯青春. 基于主成分分析及LVQ神经网络的番茄种子品种识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 1375-1383.