Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1666-1676.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230479
• Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xiaomei1,2(
), LUO Yuqin2, ZHAO Xueping2, LU Lanfei1,2, FANG Nan2, WANG Xiangyun2, JIANG Jinhua2, HE Hongmei2, ZHANG Changpeng2,*(
), WANG Qiang1,2,*(
)
Received:2023-04-11
Online:2024-07-25
Published:2024-08-05
CLC Number:
WANG Xiaomei, LUO Yuqin, ZHAO Xueping, LU Lanfei, FANG Nan, WANG Xiangyun, JIANG Jinhua, HE Hongmei, ZHANG Changpeng, WANG Qiang. Residues and dietary risk assessment of fluopyram in Dendrobium officinale[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1666-1676.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230479
| 化合物 Compound | 母离子 Precursor | 子离子 Product | 锥孔电压 Cone voltage/V | 碰撞电压 Collision energy/V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 氟吡菌酰胺Fluopyram | 397.1 | 208.0 | 30 | 40 |
| 173.0* | 30 | 30 | ||
| 2-(三氯甲基)苯甲酰胺 | 190.0 | 170.0* | 20 | 10 |
| 2-(Trifluoromethyl) benzamide | 130.0 | 20 | 20 |
Table 1 Parameters of fluopyram and 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzamide
| 化合物 Compound | 母离子 Precursor | 子离子 Product | 锥孔电压 Cone voltage/V | 碰撞电压 Collision energy/V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 氟吡菌酰胺Fluopyram | 397.1 | 208.0 | 30 | 40 |
| 173.0* | 30 | 30 | ||
| 2-(三氯甲基)苯甲酰胺 | 190.0 | 170.0* | 20 | 10 |
| 2-(Trifluoromethyl) benzamide | 130.0 | 20 | 20 |
Fig.3 Effect of different extraction solvents on the recovery of fluopyram and 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzamide in fresh (A) and dried (B) Dendrobium officinale Extract solvents of S1, S2, S3, and S4 are acetonitrile, 1% formic acid acetonitrile, methanol, and ethyl acetate, respectively.
Fig.4 Effect of application amount of PestiCarb (PC) on the recovery of fluopyram and 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzamide (BZM) in fresh (A) and dried (B) Dendrobium officinale
| 样品 Sample | 化合物 Compound | 线性范围 Linear range/ (mg·L-1) | 回归方程 Regression equation | 决定系数 Determination coefficient | 基质效应 Matrix effect | 检出限 LOD/ (mg·L-1) | 定量限 LOQ/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鲜茎 | 氟吡菌酰胺Fluopyram | 0.001~0.1 | y=4 250 459.188 1 x+3 037.381 8 | 0.998 1 | 0.93 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Fresh stem | BZM | 0.001~0.1 | y=2 938 537.804 7 x+1 388.699 0 | 0.998 9 | 0.89 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| 干茎 | 氟吡菌酰胺Fluopyram | 0.001~0.1 | y=1 834 865.947 1 x+394.743 1 | 1.000 0 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Dried stem | BZM | 0.001~0.1 | y=1 062 565.961 4x-416.343 0 | 1.000 0 | 0.71 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Table 2 Linear range, regression equation, determination coefficient, matrix effect, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for fluopyram and 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzamide (BZM)
| 样品 Sample | 化合物 Compound | 线性范围 Linear range/ (mg·L-1) | 回归方程 Regression equation | 决定系数 Determination coefficient | 基质效应 Matrix effect | 检出限 LOD/ (mg·L-1) | 定量限 LOQ/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鲜茎 | 氟吡菌酰胺Fluopyram | 0.001~0.1 | y=4 250 459.188 1 x+3 037.381 8 | 0.998 1 | 0.93 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Fresh stem | BZM | 0.001~0.1 | y=2 938 537.804 7 x+1 388.699 0 | 0.998 9 | 0.89 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| 干茎 | 氟吡菌酰胺Fluopyram | 0.001~0.1 | y=1 834 865.947 1 x+394.743 1 | 1.000 0 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Dried stem | BZM | 0.001~0.1 | y=1 062 565.961 4x-416.343 0 | 1.000 0 | 0.71 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 化合物 Compound | 样品 Sample | 添加水平 Spiking level/(mg·kg-1) | 回收率 Recovery/% | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 氟吡菌酰胺 | 鲜茎Fresh stem | 0.001 | 85.71 | 5.93 |
| Fluopyram | 0.1 | 91.80 | 2.48 | |
| 15 | 88.10 | 3.62 | ||
| 干茎Dried stem | 0.01 | 93.27 | 0.39 | |
| 0.1 | 96.52 | 0.99 | ||
| 15 | 97.98 | 2.72 | ||
| BZM | 鲜茎Fresh stem | 0.001 | 94.14 | 6.73 |
| 0.1 | 95.87 | 3.54 | ||
| 15 | 107.88 | 2.87 | ||
| 干茎Dried stem | 0.01 | 98.88 | 4.31 | |
| 0.1 | 98.61 | 1.22 | ||
| 15 | 112.21 | 1.93 |
Table 3 Recovery and relative standard deviation (RSD) of fluopyram and 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzamide (BZM) in Dendrobium officinale
| 化合物 Compound | 样品 Sample | 添加水平 Spiking level/(mg·kg-1) | 回收率 Recovery/% | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 氟吡菌酰胺 | 鲜茎Fresh stem | 0.001 | 85.71 | 5.93 |
| Fluopyram | 0.1 | 91.80 | 2.48 | |
| 15 | 88.10 | 3.62 | ||
| 干茎Dried stem | 0.01 | 93.27 | 0.39 | |
| 0.1 | 96.52 | 0.99 | ||
| 15 | 97.98 | 2.72 | ||
| BZM | 鲜茎Fresh stem | 0.001 | 94.14 | 6.73 |
| 0.1 | 95.87 | 3.54 | ||
| 15 | 107.88 | 2.87 | ||
| 干茎Dried stem | 0.01 | 98.88 | 4.31 | |
| 0.1 | 98.61 | 1.22 | ||
| 15 | 112.21 | 1.93 |
| 样品 Sample | 不同剂量下的回归方程 Regression equation under different doses | 不同剂量下的半衰期 Half-life under different doses/d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 推荐剂量 Recommended dose | 二倍推荐剂量 Double recommended does | 推荐剂量 Recommended dose | 二倍推荐剂量 Double recommended does | |
| 鲜茎Fresh stem | Ct=3.258 7e-0.036 1t(0.829 3) | Ct=5.126 8e-0.030 4t(0.849 4) | 19.20 | 22.80 |
| 干茎Dried stem | Ct=7.7800e-0.028 2t(0.878 2) | Ct=9.482 2e-0.024 1t(0.908 3) | 24.58 | 28.76 |
Table 4 Dynamics equation and half-life of fluopyram in fresh and dried Dendrobium officinale
| 样品 Sample | 不同剂量下的回归方程 Regression equation under different doses | 不同剂量下的半衰期 Half-life under different doses/d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 推荐剂量 Recommended dose | 二倍推荐剂量 Double recommended does | 推荐剂量 Recommended dose | 二倍推荐剂量 Double recommended does | |
| 鲜茎Fresh stem | Ct=3.258 7e-0.036 1t(0.829 3) | Ct=5.126 8e-0.030 4t(0.849 4) | 19.20 | 22.80 |
| 干茎Dried stem | Ct=7.7800e-0.028 2t(0.878 2) | Ct=9.482 2e-0.024 1t(0.908 3) | 24.58 | 28.76 |
| 登记作物 Registration crop | 食物种类 Food classification | 膳食量 Dietary intake/kg | 参考限量 Reference limit/(mg·kg-1) | NEDI/mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 马铃薯Potato | 薯类Tubers | 0.049 5 | 0.03 | 0.001 5 |
| 辣椒Pepper | 深色蔬菜Dark vegetables | 0.091 5 | 2 | 0.183 0 |
| 黄瓜Cucumber | 浅色蔬菜Light vegetables | 0.183 7 | 0.5 | 0.091 9 |
| 葡萄Grape | 水果Fruits | 0.045 7 | 2 | 0.091 4 |
| 坚果Nuts | 坚果Nuts | 0.003 9 | 0.04 | 0.000 2 |
| 铁皮石斛Dendrobium officinale | 酱油Soy sauce | 0.009 0 | 1.41 | 0.012 7 |
Table 5 The chronic dietary risk assessment of fluopyram in Dendrobium officinale at recommended does
| 登记作物 Registration crop | 食物种类 Food classification | 膳食量 Dietary intake/kg | 参考限量 Reference limit/(mg·kg-1) | NEDI/mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 马铃薯Potato | 薯类Tubers | 0.049 5 | 0.03 | 0.001 5 |
| 辣椒Pepper | 深色蔬菜Dark vegetables | 0.091 5 | 2 | 0.183 0 |
| 黄瓜Cucumber | 浅色蔬菜Light vegetables | 0.183 7 | 0.5 | 0.091 9 |
| 葡萄Grape | 水果Fruits | 0.045 7 | 2 | 0.091 4 |
| 坚果Nuts | 坚果Nuts | 0.003 9 | 0.04 | 0.000 2 |
| 铁皮石斛Dendrobium officinale | 酱油Soy sauce | 0.009 0 | 1.41 | 0.012 7 |
| [1] | 丰明凤, 高岩, 白嘉璇, 等. 铁皮石斛化学成分的分离与鉴定[J]. 沈阳药科大学学报, 2023, 40(5): 566-571. |
| FENG M F, GAO Y, BAI J X, et al. Isolation and identification of the chemical constituents from Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo[J]. Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 2023, 40(5): 566-571.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | TANG H X, ZHAO T W, SHENG Y J, et al. Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo: a review on its ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and industrialization[J]. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: ECAM, 2017, 2017: 7436259. |
| [3] | 奚航献, 刘晨, 刘京晶, 等. 铁皮石斛化学成分、药理作用及其质量标志物(Q-marker)的预测分析[J]. 中草药, 2020, 51(11): 3097-3109. |
| XI H X, LIU C, LIU J J, et al. Chemical components and pharmacological action for Dendrobium officinale and its prediction analysis on Q-marker[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2020, 51(11): 3097-3109.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | LIANG J, CHEN S X, HU Y D, et al. Protective roles and mechanisms of Dendrobium officinal polysaccharides on secondary liver injury in acute colitis[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 107: 2201-2210. |
| [5] | WU Y Y, LIANG C Y, LIU T T, et al. Protective roles and mechanisms of polysaccharides from Dendrobium officinal on natural aging-induced premature ovarian failure[J]. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2018, 101: 953-960. |
| [6] | 戴德江, 沈颖, 沈瑶, 等. 浙产特色中药材病虫害化学防治的研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2019, 21(S1): 759-771. |
| DAI D J, SHEN Y, SHEN Y, et al. Research progress on chemical control for main disease and insect pests of characteristic Chinese herbal medicines in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2019, 21(S1): 759-771.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 游景茂, 郭杰, 李哲, 等. 铁皮石斛灰霉病病原分离鉴定及防治[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2019, 44(18): 3954-3959. |
| YOU J M, GUO J, LI Z, et al. Isolation and identification of pathogen of Dendrobium officinale gray mold and its prevention and control[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2019, 44(18): 3954-3959.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 赵玲琳, 王国荣, 沈伟东, 等. 铁皮石斛炭疽病病原菌的分离鉴定及其有效杀菌剂的筛选[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(6): 185-190. |
| ZHAO L L, WANG G R, SHEN W D, et al. Isolation and identification of the pathogen of Dendrobium officinale anthracnose and fungicide screening in laboratory[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(6): 185-190.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 谢显彪, 沈云峰, 杨祚斌, 等. 4种杀菌剂对紫皮石斛锈病的田间药效评价[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(4): 239-242. |
| XIE X B, SHEN Y F, YANG Z B, et al. Field efficacy evaluation of four fungicides on dendrobium rust[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(4): 239-242.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 李静, 张敬泽, 吴晓鹏, 等. 铁皮石斛疫病及其病原菌[J]. 菌物学报, 2008, 27(2): 171-176. |
| LI J, ZHANG J Z, WU X P, et al. The causal agent of Dendrobium candidum blight disease[J]. Mycosystema, 2008, 27(2): 171-176.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | SHARMA N, MANDAL K, SHARMA S. Dissipation and risk assessment of fluopyram and trifloxystrobin on onion by GC-MS/MS[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(53): 80612-80623. |
| [12] | 赵建江, 王文桥, 马志强, 等. 两种新杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病的作用方式及田间防效[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016(5): 18-21. |
| ZHAO J J, WANG W Q, MA Z Q, et al. Action mode and field control efficiency of two new fungicides against tomato gray mould[J]. China Vegetables, 2016(5): 18-21.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 刘树林, 张娟, 郭飞. 50%氟吡菌酰胺悬浮剂对黄瓜灰霉病防控效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(18): 86-87. |
| LIU S L, ZHANG J, GUO F. Study on the control effect of 50% flupiromyl amide suspension concentrate on cucumber gray mold[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(18): 86-87.(in Chinese) | |
| [14] | 张晓柯, 韩絮, 马薇薇, 等. 江苏省草莓灰霉病菌对氟吡菌酰胺敏感性基线的建立及抗性风险评估[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2015, 38(5): 810-815. |
| ZHANG X K, HAN X, MA W W, et al. Baseline sensitivity of fluopyram and its resistance risk assessment against Botrytis cinerea from strawberry in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015, 38(5): 810-815.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | VARGAS-PÉREZ M, EGEA GONZÁLEZ F J, GARRIDO FRENICH A. Dissipation and residue determination of fluopyram and its metabolites in greenhouse crops[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020, 100(13): 4826-4833. |
| [16] | WEI P, LIU Y N, LI W Z, et al. Metabolic and dynamic profiling for risk assessment of fluopyram, a typical phenylamide fungicide widely applied in vegetable ecosystem[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 33898. |
| [17] | 于福利, 付萍萍, 王素琴, 等. 番茄中氟吡菌酰胺残留量的气相色谱分析[J]. 农药, 2016, 55(4): 278-279. |
| YU F L, FU P P, WANG S Q, et al. Determination of fluopyrac residues in tomato by gas chromatography[J]. Agrochemicals, 2016, 55(4): 278-279.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 赵成林, 王佛娇, 程小会, 等. 41.7%氟吡菌酰胺悬浮剂的高效液相色谱分析[J]. 农药, 2020, 59(1): 27-28. |
| ZHAO C L, WANG F J, CHENG X H, et al. Analysis of fluopyram 41.7% SC by HPLC[J]. Agrochemicals, 2020, 59(1): 27-28.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 李文卓, 钱圆, MATSUMOTO H, 等. 气相色谱-串联质谱检测蔬菜中氟吡菌酰胺及其代谢物残留[J]. 农药学学报, 2016, 18(6): 759-764. |
| LI W Z, QIAN Y, MATSUMOTO H, et al. Simultaneous determination of fluopyram and its metabolite in vegetables using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2016, 18(6): 759-764.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 李珊, 孙志洪, 郭伟伟, 等. 气相色谱-三重四级杆串联质谱法测定土壤中氟啶虫酰胺、氟吡菌酰胺、唑虫酰胺、杀虫脲和氟虫脲[J]. 中国测试, 2022, 48(6): 64-68. |
| LI S, SUN Z H, GUO W W, et al. Determination of flutamide, flupirimide, azolomide, chlorfenuron and flufenuron in soil by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry[J]. China Measurement & Test, 2022, 48(6): 64-68.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 范金平, 张盈, 魏进, 等. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定芒果中氟吡菌酰胺、肟菌酯及其代谢物残留量[J]. 农药, 2020, 59(7): 516-522. |
| FAN J P, ZHANG Y, WEI J, et al. Determination of fluopyram, trifloxystrobin and its metabolite in mango by QuEChERS-UHPLC-MS/MS[J]. Agrochemicals, 2020, 59(7): 516-522.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 马琳, 陈建波, 赵莉, 等. 固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定果蔬中6种酰胺类农药残留量[J]. 色谱, 2015, 33(10): 1019-1025. |
| MA L, CHEN J B, ZHAO L, et al. Determination of six amide pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits by solid phase extraction-ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(10): 1019-1025.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | CEBALLOS-ALCANTARILLA E, AGULLÓ C, ABAD-SOMOVILLA A, et al. Highly sensitive monoclonal antibody-based immunoassays for the analysis of fluopyram in food samples[J]. Food Chemistry, 2019, 288: 117-126. |
| [24] | YOGENDRAIAH MATADHA N, MOHAPATRA S, SIDDAMALLAIAH L. Distribution of fluopyram and tebuconazole in pomegranate tissues and their risk assessment[J]. Food Chemistry, 2021, 358: 129909. |
| [25] | TRIPATHY V, SHARMA K K, MOHAPATRA S, et al. Persistence evaluation of fluopyram+tebuconazole residues on mango and pomegranate and their risk assessment[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2022, 29(22): 33180-33190. |
| [26] | 吉小凤, 吕文涛, 汪建妹, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鲜鸡蛋中氟虫腈及其代谢物残留[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1849-1854. |
| JI X F, LV W T, WANG J M, et al. Determination of fipronil and its metabolites in fresh eggs by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(10): 1849-1854.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | FU Y, WANG Q S, ZHANG L, et al. Dissipation, occurrence, and risk assessment of 12 pesticides in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 222: 112487. |
| [28] | 秦世鹏, 胡继业. 马铃薯中氟吡菌胺、氰霜唑及相关代谢物的残留量及膳食风险评估[J]. 农药, 2022, 61(7): 500-506. |
| QIN S P, HU J Y. Residues and dietary risk assessment of fluopicolide, cyazofamid and related metabolites in potato[J]. Agrochemicals, 2022, 61(7): 500-506.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 谭菲菲, 高政绪, 高强, 等. 氟吡菌酰胺及其代谢物在烟草种植和加工过程中的降解特征[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(5): 69-74. |
| TAN F F, GAO Z X, GAO Q, et al. Residue degradation of fluopyram and its metabolites during tobacco planting and processing[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2021, 42(5): 69-74.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | CHAWLA S, PATEL D J, PATEL S H, et al. Behaviour and risk assessment of fluopyram and its metabolite in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) fruit and in soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(12): 11626-11634. |
| [31] | 林静, 张顺, 蔡挺, 等. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱技术同时测定大蒜中10种农药残留[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 159-166. |
| LIN J, ZHANG S, CAI T, et al. Determination of 10 pesticide residues in garlic by QuEChERS-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(1): 159-166.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | DONG B Z, HU J Y. Dissipation and residue determination of fluopyram and tebuconazole residues in watermelon and soil by GC-MS[J]. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 94(5): 493-505. |
| [33] | MOHAPATRA S, SIDDAMALLAIAH L, BUDDIDATHI R, et al. Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of fluopyram and tebuconazole in mango (Mangifera indica)[J]. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 98(3): 229-246. |
| [34] | PATEL B V, CHAWLA S, GOR H, et al. Residue decline and risk assessment of fluopyram+tebuconazole (400SC) in/on onion (Allium cepa)[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(20): 20871-20881. |
| [35] | FAO. Inventory of evaluations performed by the joint meeting on pesticide residue (JMPR)[DB/OL].[2023-04-11]. https://www.fao.org/pest-and-pesticide-management/guidelines-standards/faowho-joint-meeting-on-pesticide-residues-jmpr/pesticides-evaluated-by-jmpr-jmps/en/. |
| [1] | SUN Fengting, WANG Xu, HAN Xinyu, XU Zhenlan, WU Shenggan, HUANG Hao, TANG Tao, SHENG Qing, WANG Qiang, SHEN Guoqiang, ZHAO Xueping. Effect of sodium nitrophenolate on flavonoid content and antioxidant activity in Dendrobium officinale [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 934-942. |
| [2] | QIAO Huiru, FANG Xiangjun, WU Weijie, LIU Ruiling, CHEN Hangjun, DENG Shanggui, SHA Hao, GAO Haiyan. Process optimization and quality analysis of composite lactic acid bacteria fermented beverage with blueberries and Dendrobium officinale leaves [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(3): 654-666. |
| [3] | HUANG Hao, TANG Tao, XU Zhenlan, ZHAO Xueping. Effects of pyraclostrobin on polysaccharide and flavone in Dendrobium officinale [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(1): 115-125. |
| [4] | ZHANG Ni, TAO Wenyang, LUO Mengfan, ZHOU Wanyi, ZHENG Xiaojie, LI Yanpo, JIN Huoxi, YANG Ying. Effects of enzyme-assisted extraction on composition and gut microbiota regulation function of Dendrobium officinale polysaccharide [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2099-2109. |
| [5] | ZHAO Xiaoliang, LU Yun, KANG Xingxing, LONG Zeyu, ZHENG Xiaojie. Extraction, structural characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Dendrobium officinale in Yandang Mountain, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1898-1908. |
| [6] | ZHU Yan, DING Lan, CHEN Yiqian, HUANG Xiujing, JIANG Weiwei, CHEN Donghong. Identification and functional analysis of CLE gene family in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1583-1590. |
| [7] | CHU Tianfen, LEI Ling, LI Qinfeng, WU Ping, HONG Wenjie, ZHENG Weiran. Quality safety risk assessment of watermelon industry in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1153-1160. |
| [8] | LI Yaping, JIN Fulai, HUANG Zonggui, ZHANG Tao, DUAN Xiaojing, JIANG Wu, TAO Zhengming, CHEN Jiadong. Identification and expression pattern analysis of glycoside hydrolase GH3 gene family in Dendrobium officinale [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 790-799. |
| [9] | LIANG Xiumei, ZHANG Weiyi, CHEN Guanju, XIA Haitao, GUO Xiuzhu, HE Ruyi, JIANG Jiaming, LIN Dingpeng. Investigation of pesticide residues and heavy metal contamination characteristics and dietary risk assessment of Myrica rubra in Wenzhou, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(10): 2347-2357. |
| [10] | LI Jingrui, TAO Wenyang, YANG Ying, ZHOU Wanyi, LU Shengmin, WANG Yangguang. Comparative studies of polysaccharides of three Dendrobium species from Zhejiang Province and exploration of their physiological functions [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1888-1895. |
| [11] | LU Lanfei, ZHAO Xueping, MA Zheng, FANG Nan, LUO Yuqin, WANG Xiaomei, YE Hui, LEI Yuan, WANG Qiang, ZHANG Changpeng. Determination of 2, 4-epibrassinolide residues in Dendrobium officinale by solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(8): 1896-1903. |
| [12] | YE Hui, CHEN Yuting, LUO Yuqin, FAN Xuyan, LEI Yuan, LU Lanfei, HAO Peipei, CHENG Youpu, ZHANG Changpeng. Residue and dissipation dynamics of two formulations of pyraclostrobin in strawberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(7): 1720-1728. |
| [13] | ZHANG Chunrong, GUO Qian, KONG Liping, WU Yuanyuan, LIN Qin, XU Zhenlan, ZHAO Xueping, TANG Tao. Residue behavior and dietary exposure risk assessment of azoxystrobin in waxberry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 942-951. |
| [14] | SUN Fengting, XU Zhenlan, ZHU Zuoyi, ZHANG Chunrong, TANG Tao, ZHAO Xueping, SHENG Qing, WANG Qiang. Determination of flavonoids in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo and study on its bioavailability [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(11): 2710-2719. |
| [15] | LIN Yuqing, LU Shengmin, ZHOU Wanyi, XING Jianrong, YANG Ying. Preliminary investigation about structure and probiotic properties of polysaccharides from Dendrobium officinale leaves [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2504-2511. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||