Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 2447-2455.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231125
• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIAO Xuehuan(
), ZHANG Keyuan, AER Lise, ZHOU Lin, YANG Erluo, DENG Jun, ZHANG Rongping(
)
Received:2023-09-19
Online:2024-11-25
Published:2024-11-27
CLC Number:
LIAO Xuehuan, ZHANG Keyuan, AER Lise, ZHOU Lin, YANG Erluo, DENG Jun, ZHANG Rongping. Effects of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer on growth and yield of hybrid rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2447-2455.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231125
Fig.1 Effect of branch fertilizer on dynamics of tiller and stem in rice F1, Ordinary compound fertilizer; F2, Branch fertilizer. T1, Longliangyou534; T2, Longliangyou1813; T3, Mengliangyousimiao; T4, Quanyou967; T5, Hengfengyouyuxiang; T6, Chuankangyou6308. The same as below.
Fig.2 Effect of branch fertilizer and functional fertilizer on leaf area index (LAI) of rice P1, Spray water; P2, Functional fertilizer. Bars marked without the same letters indicate significant differences within treatments at P<0.05 for the same variety. The same as below.
| 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 抽穗后干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation after heading/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物质转运量 Transport volume of dry matter from stem and leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物质转运率 Transport rate of dry matter from stem and leaves/% | 对籽粒贡 献率 Contribution rate to grains/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 成熟期 Mature stage | ||||||
| T1 | F2P1 | 13 103.20 b | 18 089.27 b | 4 986.07 c | 3 224.97 a | 28.67 a | 32.04 a |
| F2P2 | 13 844.17 a | 21 972.65 a | 8 128.48 a | 2 457.6b c | 20.76 d | 19.51 d | |
| F1P1 | 11 381.32 d | 17 271.93 d | 5 890.61 b | 2 275.54 c | 23.20 c | 23.37 c | |
| F1P2 | 11 933.95 c | 17 876.67 c | 5 942.72 b | 2 648.60 b | 25.78 b | 25.84 b | |
| T2 | F2P1 | 14 163.57 b | 18 341.08 b | 4 177.50 c | 3 760.06 a | 30.80 b | 37.97 a |
| F2P2 | 14 553.66 a | 20 113.52 a | 5 559.86 a | 3 651.70 a | 30.06 b | 31.43 b | |
| F1P1 | 10 637.26 d | 14 056.24 d | 3 418.99 d | 3 002.07 b | 33.85 a | 36.65 a | |
| F1P2 | 12 183.69 c | 16 974.72 c | 4 791.02 b | 2 803.40 b | 27.04 c | 29.77 b | |
| T3 | F2P1 | 10 274.51 c | 16 934.98 b | 6 660.47 a | 1 328.17 d | 15.75 c | 13.51 c |
| F2P2 | 12 746.90 a | 19 626.94 a | 6 880.03 a | 2 314.24 b | 21.68 b | 20.49 b | |
| F1P1 | 9 789.48 d | 15 557.79 d | 5 768.32 b | 1 672.86 c | 20.20 b | 18.69 b | |
| F1P2 | 11 830.75 b | 16 421.05 c | 4 590.30 c | 3 285.86 a | 32.97 a | 33.73 a | |
| T4 | F2P1 | 10 500.52 b | 18 887.51 b | 8 387.00 b | 1 029.93 a | 11.42 a | 9.45 a |
| F2P2 | 11 118.68 a | 21 795.15 a | 10 676.47 a | 488.65 b | 5.23 b | 3.77 b | |
| F1P1 | 7 830.75 d | 16 091.85 d | 8 261.09 b | 236.33 c | 3.48 bc | 2.48 b | |
| F1P2 | 8 772.96 c | 17 047.47 c | 8 274.51 b | 236.84 c | 3.17 c | 2.41 b | |
| T5 | F2P1 | 9 913.83 b | 14 892.16 b | 4 978.33 c | 2 856.55 a | 35.09 a | 29.72 a |
| F2P2 | 10 534.57 a | 20 502.58 a | 9 968.01 a | 324.04 c | 3.74 c | 2.67 c | |
| F1P1 | 7 208.98 d | 13 166.67 c | 5 957.69 b | 267.80 c | 4.58 c | 3.53 c | |
| F1P2 | 8 259.54 c | 12 592.36 d | 4 332.82 d | 1 406.60 b | 20.92 b | 19.32 b | |
| T6 | F2P1 | 11 520.64 b | 19 577.40 a | 8 056.76 a | 1 889.06 c | 19.57 d | 15.98 d |
| F2P2 | 13 004.64 a | 18 256.97 b | 5 252.32 c | 3 557.79 a | 34.21 b | 31.16 b | |
| F1P1 | 8 617.13 d | 12 175.44 d | 3 558.31 d | 2 664.09 b | 36.55 a | 35.26 a | |
| F1P2 | 9 059.86 c | 14 712.59 c | 5 652.73 b | 2 062.44 c | 27.29 c | 22.37 c | |
Table 1 Dry matter accumulation and transportation of rice under treatments
| 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 抽穗后干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation after heading/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物质转运量 Transport volume of dry matter from stem and leaves/ (kg·hm-2) | 茎叶干物质转运率 Transport rate of dry matter from stem and leaves/% | 对籽粒贡 献率 Contribution rate to grains/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 成熟期 Mature stage | ||||||
| T1 | F2P1 | 13 103.20 b | 18 089.27 b | 4 986.07 c | 3 224.97 a | 28.67 a | 32.04 a |
| F2P2 | 13 844.17 a | 21 972.65 a | 8 128.48 a | 2 457.6b c | 20.76 d | 19.51 d | |
| F1P1 | 11 381.32 d | 17 271.93 d | 5 890.61 b | 2 275.54 c | 23.20 c | 23.37 c | |
| F1P2 | 11 933.95 c | 17 876.67 c | 5 942.72 b | 2 648.60 b | 25.78 b | 25.84 b | |
| T2 | F2P1 | 14 163.57 b | 18 341.08 b | 4 177.50 c | 3 760.06 a | 30.80 b | 37.97 a |
| F2P2 | 14 553.66 a | 20 113.52 a | 5 559.86 a | 3 651.70 a | 30.06 b | 31.43 b | |
| F1P1 | 10 637.26 d | 14 056.24 d | 3 418.99 d | 3 002.07 b | 33.85 a | 36.65 a | |
| F1P2 | 12 183.69 c | 16 974.72 c | 4 791.02 b | 2 803.40 b | 27.04 c | 29.77 b | |
| T3 | F2P1 | 10 274.51 c | 16 934.98 b | 6 660.47 a | 1 328.17 d | 15.75 c | 13.51 c |
| F2P2 | 12 746.90 a | 19 626.94 a | 6 880.03 a | 2 314.24 b | 21.68 b | 20.49 b | |
| F1P1 | 9 789.48 d | 15 557.79 d | 5 768.32 b | 1 672.86 c | 20.20 b | 18.69 b | |
| F1P2 | 11 830.75 b | 16 421.05 c | 4 590.30 c | 3 285.86 a | 32.97 a | 33.73 a | |
| T4 | F2P1 | 10 500.52 b | 18 887.51 b | 8 387.00 b | 1 029.93 a | 11.42 a | 9.45 a |
| F2P2 | 11 118.68 a | 21 795.15 a | 10 676.47 a | 488.65 b | 5.23 b | 3.77 b | |
| F1P1 | 7 830.75 d | 16 091.85 d | 8 261.09 b | 236.33 c | 3.48 bc | 2.48 b | |
| F1P2 | 8 772.96 c | 17 047.47 c | 8 274.51 b | 236.84 c | 3.17 c | 2.41 b | |
| T5 | F2P1 | 9 913.83 b | 14 892.16 b | 4 978.33 c | 2 856.55 a | 35.09 a | 29.72 a |
| F2P2 | 10 534.57 a | 20 502.58 a | 9 968.01 a | 324.04 c | 3.74 c | 2.67 c | |
| F1P1 | 7 208.98 d | 13 166.67 c | 5 957.69 b | 267.80 c | 4.58 c | 3.53 c | |
| F1P2 | 8 259.54 c | 12 592.36 d | 4 332.82 d | 1 406.60 b | 20.92 b | 19.32 b | |
| T6 | F2P1 | 11 520.64 b | 19 577.40 a | 8 056.76 a | 1 889.06 c | 19.57 d | 15.98 d |
| F2P2 | 13 004.64 a | 18 256.97 b | 5 252.32 c | 3 557.79 a | 34.21 b | 31.16 b | |
| F1P1 | 8 617.13 d | 12 175.44 d | 3 558.31 d | 2 664.09 b | 36.55 a | 35.26 a | |
| F1P2 | 9 059.86 c | 14 712.59 c | 5 652.73 b | 2 062.44 c | 27.29 c | 22.37 c | |
| 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(104 hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 穗粒数 Kernel number per spike | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 收获指数 Harvest index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | F2P1 | 281.59 b | 93.62 a | 23.56 b | 158.97 c | 9 352.75 c | 0.55 b |
| F2P2 | 297.33 a | 91.74 b | 24.37 a | 189.98 a | 11 964.41 a | 0.57 a | |
| F1P1 | 251.87 c | 93.33 a | 23.52 b | 175.66 b | 9 201.78 c | 0.56 a | |
| F1P2 | 250.76 c | 91.72 b | 23.73 b | 190.20 a | 9 830.08 b | 0.55 b | |
| T2 | F2P1 | 210.02 b | 86.39 d | 26.68 ab | 254.08 b | 11 653.24 b | 0.56 b |
| F2P2 | 223.04 a | 94.58 a | 26.97 a | 232.18 d | 12 512.04 a | 0.60 a | |
| F1P1 | 164.82 d | 90.67 c | 26.47 b | 235.40 c | 8 820.36 d | 0.57 b | |
| F1P2 | 178.32 c | 92.50 b | 26.30 b | 260.70 a | 10 715.57 c | 0.53 c | |
| T3 | F2P1 | 217.37 c | 91.51 c | 24.36 b | 208.25 c | 9 559.86 c | 0.61 a |
| F2P2 | 243.63 a | 96.32 a | 24.83 a | 217.25 a | 11 988.76 a | 0.59 b | |
| F1P1 | 214.05 c | 93.51 b | 24.45 ab | 193.91 d | 8 991.45 d | 0.56 c | |
| F1P2 | 228.54 b | 95.39 a | 24.29 b | 214.54 b | 10 758.72 b | 0.59 b | |
| T4 | F2P1 | 222.44 a | 94.38 a | 27.86 a | 193.34 c | 10 708.85 b | 0.60 b |
| F2P2 | 220.04 a | 92.79 ab | 27.78 a | 218.54 a | 11 743.74 a | 0.61 ab | |
| F1P1 | 168.79 c | 92.08 b | 27.58 ab | 208.48 b | 8 536.30 c | 0.62 a | |
| F1P2 | 201.80 b | 93.40 ab | 27.30 b | 218.41 a | 10 645.41 b | 0.60 b | |
| T5 | F2P1 | 228.54 b | 84.28 c | 23.56 a | 227.65 d | 9 784.84 b | 0.57 c |
| F2P2 | 243.19 a | 89.48 a | 23.70 a | 253.89 b | 12 405.74 a | 0.59 b | |
| F1P1 | 146.73 d | 88.65 a | 23.61 a | 250.13 c | 7 276.97 d | 0.61 a | |
| F1P2 | 156.97 c | 86.11 b | 23.52 a | 260.75 a | 7 848.21 c | 0.60 a | |
| T6 | F2P1 | 208.55 b | 85.28 c | 27.66 a | 191.95 b | 8 946.98 b | 0.57 c |
| F2P2 | 231.75 a | 91.33 b | 27.55 a | 191.15 b | 10 561.57 a | 0.60 a | |
| F1P1 | 163.40 d | 93.22 a | 26.75 b | 196.55 a | 7 586.94 d | 0.59 b | |
| F1P2 | 188.62 c | 92.10 ab | 27.08 b | 181.41 c | 8 085.43 c | 0.60 ab |
Table 2 Yield and its components of rice under treatments
| 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(104 hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 穗粒数 Kernel number per spike | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 收获指数 Harvest index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | F2P1 | 281.59 b | 93.62 a | 23.56 b | 158.97 c | 9 352.75 c | 0.55 b |
| F2P2 | 297.33 a | 91.74 b | 24.37 a | 189.98 a | 11 964.41 a | 0.57 a | |
| F1P1 | 251.87 c | 93.33 a | 23.52 b | 175.66 b | 9 201.78 c | 0.56 a | |
| F1P2 | 250.76 c | 91.72 b | 23.73 b | 190.20 a | 9 830.08 b | 0.55 b | |
| T2 | F2P1 | 210.02 b | 86.39 d | 26.68 ab | 254.08 b | 11 653.24 b | 0.56 b |
| F2P2 | 223.04 a | 94.58 a | 26.97 a | 232.18 d | 12 512.04 a | 0.60 a | |
| F1P1 | 164.82 d | 90.67 c | 26.47 b | 235.40 c | 8 820.36 d | 0.57 b | |
| F1P2 | 178.32 c | 92.50 b | 26.30 b | 260.70 a | 10 715.57 c | 0.53 c | |
| T3 | F2P1 | 217.37 c | 91.51 c | 24.36 b | 208.25 c | 9 559.86 c | 0.61 a |
| F2P2 | 243.63 a | 96.32 a | 24.83 a | 217.25 a | 11 988.76 a | 0.59 b | |
| F1P1 | 214.05 c | 93.51 b | 24.45 ab | 193.91 d | 8 991.45 d | 0.56 c | |
| F1P2 | 228.54 b | 95.39 a | 24.29 b | 214.54 b | 10 758.72 b | 0.59 b | |
| T4 | F2P1 | 222.44 a | 94.38 a | 27.86 a | 193.34 c | 10 708.85 b | 0.60 b |
| F2P2 | 220.04 a | 92.79 ab | 27.78 a | 218.54 a | 11 743.74 a | 0.61 ab | |
| F1P1 | 168.79 c | 92.08 b | 27.58 ab | 208.48 b | 8 536.30 c | 0.62 a | |
| F1P2 | 201.80 b | 93.40 ab | 27.30 b | 218.41 a | 10 645.41 b | 0.60 b | |
| T5 | F2P1 | 228.54 b | 84.28 c | 23.56 a | 227.65 d | 9 784.84 b | 0.57 c |
| F2P2 | 243.19 a | 89.48 a | 23.70 a | 253.89 b | 12 405.74 a | 0.59 b | |
| F1P1 | 146.73 d | 88.65 a | 23.61 a | 250.13 c | 7 276.97 d | 0.61 a | |
| F1P2 | 156.97 c | 86.11 b | 23.52 a | 260.75 a | 7 848.21 c | 0.60 a | |
| T6 | F2P1 | 208.55 b | 85.28 c | 27.66 a | 191.95 b | 8 946.98 b | 0.57 c |
| F2P2 | 231.75 a | 91.33 b | 27.55 a | 191.15 b | 10 561.57 a | 0.60 a | |
| F1P1 | 163.40 d | 93.22 a | 26.75 b | 196.55 a | 7 586.94 d | 0.59 b | |
| F1P2 | 188.62 c | 92.10 ab | 27.08 b | 181.41 c | 8 085.43 c | 0.60 ab |
| [1] | 赵秉强. 传统化肥增效改性提升产品性能与功能[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1): 1-7. |
| ZHAO B Q. Modification of conventional fertilizers for enhanced property and function[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(1): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 许祥富, 林明义. 我国新型肥料的研究现状及在水稻上的应用进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(7): 17-19. |
| XU X F, LIN M Y. Research status of new fertilizer in China and its application in rice[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(7): 17-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 李平远, 沈兵, 裴友良, 等. 超高产水稻专用复合肥肥效试验[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2011, 26(1): 68-69. |
| LI P Y, SHEN B, PEI Y L, et al. Fertilizer effect test of specialty fertilizer for super-high-yielding rice[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2011, 26(1): 68-69. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 冯恩位. 不同水稻专用新型肥料减肥增效对比效果分析[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2022(3): 7-9. |
| FENG E W. Analysis on the comparative effects of different new special fertilizers for rice on weight loss and efficiency[J]. Agricultural Technology & Equipment, 2022(3): 7-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 伍龙梅, 李惠芬, 张彬, 等. 中微量元素肥料对超级杂交籼稻株型和干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(28): 1-6. |
| WU L M, LI H F, ZHANG B, et al. Medium and microelements fertilizer: effects on plant type and dry matter accumulation of super hybrid indica rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(28): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 卢俊, 陈锦珠, 朱孔志, 等. 不同新型高效肥料在苏北地区水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(7): 10-11. |
| LU J, CHEN J Z, ZHU K Z, et al. Application effect of different new high-efficiency fertilizers on rice in northern Jiangsu Province[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(7): 10-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 袁亚莉. 黑道白道生物返青肥在寒地水稻上应用效果[J]. 现代化农业, 2010(11): 10. |
| YUAN Y L. Application effect of biofertilizer on rice in cold area[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2010(11): 10. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 易靖, 隗华军, 刘伟, 等. 分蘖肥施用时期对水稻机插秧群体及产量的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2021, 15(16): 43-45. |
| YI J, KUI H J, LIU W, et al. Effect of tillering fertilizer application period on population and yield of machine-transplanted rice seedling[J]. South China Agriculture, 2021, 15(16): 43-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 王文华. 吡唑醚菌酯+芸苔素内酯+叶面肥“高产套餐” 混配施用技术[J]. 河南农业, 2021(22): 18. |
| WANG W H. Application technology of pyraclostrobin+brassinolide+foliar fertilizer[J]. Agriculture of Henan, 2021(22): 18. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 骆琴, 周宇杰, 何信富. 芸苔素内酯与吡唑醚菌酯对水稻抗病性及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1): 72-74. |
| LUO Q, ZHOU Y J, HE X F. Effects of brassinolide and pyrazole ethermycin on disease resistance and quality of rice[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(1): 72-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 殷敏, 丁颖, 庄东英, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂复配对水稻产量性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(5): 5-8. |
| YIN M, DING Y, ZHUANG D Y, et al. Effects of different plant growth regulator groups on rice yield traits[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(5): 5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 吴挺. 胺鲜酯·芸苔素内酯对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 上海农业科技, 2019(4): 48-49. |
| WU T. Effects of brassinolide on rice growth and yield[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(4): 48-49. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 赵黎明, 李明, 冯乃杰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对寒地水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(3): 43-48. |
| ZHAO L M, LI M, FENG N J, et al. Effect of plant growth regulators on yield and quality of rice in the cold region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(3): 43-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 褚世海, 李林, 朱文达. 0.01%芸苔素内酯水剂对水稻生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(24): 6445-6448. |
| CHU S H, LI L, ZHU W D. Effect of 0.01% brassinolide AS on the growth, yield and quality of rice[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 55(24): 6445-6448. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 吴玉成, 王勇, 吴志青, 等. 芸苔素内酯对水稻生长的调节作用研究[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2015, 38(3): 228-230. |
| WU Y C, WANG Y, WU Z Q, et al. Regulating effect of 0.1% brassinolide soluble powder on rice[J]. Biological Disaster Science, 2015, 38(3): 228-230. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 徐建林, 宋金华, 张夕林, 等. 芸苔素内酯水溶液调节水稻生长试验[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2006, 12(2): 40-41. |
| XU J L, SONG J H, ZHANG X L, et al. Regulation of rice growth by brassinolide solution[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 12(2): 40-41. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 孙淑琴, 杨秀荣, 李月娇. 0.007 5%高芸苔素内酯可溶液剂在水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(13): 108-109. |
| SUN S Q, YANG X R, LI Y J. Study on the application effect of 0.007 5% 28-homobrassinolide SL on rice[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(13): 108-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 顾俊荣, 董明辉, 杨代凤, 等. 一种新型水稻生长调节剂对超级稻籽粒结实与品质特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(12): 8-13. |
| GU J R, DONG M H, YANG D F, et al. Effects of a kind of new-type rice growth regulator on grain setting traits and quality of super rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(12): 8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 刘伟, 郑建国, 王兆燕. 植物生长调节剂与肥料复配的研究与应用[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2015, 30(3): 28-29. |
| LIU W, ZHENG J G, WANG Z Y. Research and application of compounding of plant growth regulator and fertilizer[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2015, 30(3): 28-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 张姿, 于海燕, 李威, 等. 大量元素水溶肥和植物生长调节剂GGR 6号配施对辣椒农艺性状的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(9): 54-59. |
| ZHANG Z, YU H Y, LI W, et al. Effects of macronutrient water soluble fertilizer and plant growth regulator GGR 6 combination on agronomic characters of pepper[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(9): 54-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 胡鹏. 4种新型肥料对水稻生长影响效果的研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(15): 90-92. |
| HU P. Study on effects of four new fertilizers on rice growth[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 25(15): 90-92. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | 吴文革, 习敏, 李红春, 等. 不同水稻专用新型肥料减肥增效对比研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(2): 135-137. |
| WU W G, XI M, LI H C, et al. Comparative study on the effects of fertilizer reduction with efficiency increase by appling different rice-specific new type fertilizers[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(2): 135-137. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 聂俊, 史亮亮, 邱俊荣, 等. 有机肥和化肥配施对抛栽水稻群体干物质生产和产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(3): 579-583. |
| NIE J, SHI L L, QIU J R, et al. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizers on dry matter production and yield of rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(3): 579-583. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 唐乐丹. 新型专用肥料对水稻生长发育、产量及抗倒性的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019. |
| TANG L D. Effects of new special fertilizer on growth development, yield and lodging resistance of rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 郑乐娅, 吴文革, 阎川, 等. 植物生长调节剂对水稻光合速率和产量构成因素的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2011(3): 63-66. |
| ZHENG L Y, WU W G, YAN C, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on photosynthetic rate and yield components of rice[J]. Crops, 2011(3): 63-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 吕洪九. 新型高效肥料施用对水稻根系发育及产量的影响[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2022, 33(18): 44-46. |
| LÜ H J. Effects of new high-efficiency fertilizer application on root development and yield of rice[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2022, 33(18): 44-46. (in Chinese) | |
| [27] | 蒿呈龙, 姚继刚, 屈天元, 等. 不同类型新型肥料在水稻生产上应用效果的研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(10): 65-69. |
| HAO C L, YAO J G, QU T Y, et al. Study on the application effect of different types of new fertilizers on rice production[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(10): 65-69. (in Chinese) | |
| [28] | 徐淑英. 新型肥料对水稻福香占产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3): 109-111. |
| XU S Y. Effects of new fertilizations on yield and grain quality of rice variety Fuxiangzhan[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(3): 109-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 宋伟丰, 韦庆慧, 刘凯, 等. 芸苔素甾醇复配磷酸二氢钾对耐盐碱水稻产量影响的研究[J]. 现代农药, 2022, 21(2): 62-64. |
| SONG W F, WEI Q H, LIU K, et al. Study on the effect of the mixture of brasszinoszteroid and potassium dihydngen phosphate on saline-tolerant rice yield[J]. Modern Agrochemicals, 2022, 21(2): 62-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | WU Ju, YANG Fei, WU Guoquan, FU Xian, XU Chenguang. Effects of sand culture and soil culture on growth, yield, and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913. |
| [2] | ZHU Weijing, WU Jia, HONG Chunlai, ZHU Fengxiang, HONG Leidong, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Shuo, ZHU Huifen. Effects of straw mulching on water, heat, fertility status of soil and yield and quality of flat peach [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932. |
| [3] | ZHANG Zhiying, QIU Qin, HOU Lijuan, XU Ping, JIANG Ning, LIN Jinsheng, LI Huiping, QU Shaoxuan, MA Lin, WANG Weixia, LI Fuhou. Evaluation on the safety of insecticides application on Pleurotus pulmonarius and Auricularia cornea [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1733-1742. |
| [4] | YAN Fulin, LANG Yunhu, JIAN Yingquan, CHEN Xiongfei, WEI Wei, WANG Zhiwei, AN Jiangyong, REN Deqiang, DING Ning, WEI Shenghua. Response of yield and quality of Radix Ardisia to soil physiochemical properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775. |
| [5] | ZHANG Zhi, HE Haohao, YU Miao, XU Jianfeng. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with soil conditioner on soil acidity, soil nutrients and rice yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308. |
| [6] | LIN Xiaobing, LI Jiang, CHENG Yanhong, WANG Binqiang, HE Shaolang, HUANG Shangshu, HUANG Qianru. Effects of organic materials on soil microbial biomass, mineral nitrogen content and rice yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318. |
| [7] | ZOU Junyan, WANG Yunzhu, ZHAO Wanqiu, YIN Zhihao, DU Jianke, SUN Chongbo. Research progress of protocorm and protocorm-like body in Orchidaceae plants [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1372-1389. |
| [8] | HU Xinrou, WANG Mei, ZHANG Yafen, CAI Weiming, JIN Qunli. Effect of abiotic stress on growth development and response mechanism of Ganoderma [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1182-1190. |
| [9] | DONG Zhichao, YUE Ningyan, LYU Wei, YU Xiaoyi, ZHENG Kaiwen, SONG Haixing, CHEN Haifei. Differential responses of yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency to nitrogen application rate in high- and low-oil content rapeseed varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 998-1008. |
| [10] | LI Yancui, LI Fuqiang, ZHOU Bo. Effects of deficit irrigation at different growth stages on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 779-789. |
| [11] | QIN Yukun, CHEN Junying, WANG Yuping, ZHANG Lijuan. Effects of reducing nitrogen and increasing carbon on cotton production and nitrogen absorption and utilization in the Yangtze River Basin of China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 869-879. |
| [12] | YING Yongfei, HAN Dongxuan, MENG Fang, YU Lin, SHEN Jialuan, WANG Kaiying. Effects of biogas slurry substituting chemical fertilizer on rice yield and quality and soil characteristics [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(4): 880-891. |
| [13] | WAN Shaoyuan, LIU Xianbo, CAI Shuo, SHI Hong, CHENG Jie. Effect of irrigation and planting methods on the yield and quality of double-cropping rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 257-268. |
| [14] | LI Can, YANG Ting, SUN Yiming, CHEN Hongliang, CUI Qi, SHEN Xiaoxia. Selection and evaluation of superior germplasm resources of Rubus chingii Hu [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 349-364. |
| [15] | LI Jianqiang, WEI Qianqian, LIU Xiaoxia, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunquan. Effects of optimizing fertilization methods on rice yield and soil nutrient balance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 438-446. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||