Analysis of rice blast resistance in rice varieties from regional trials in Zhejiang Province of China from 2014 to 2023

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240672

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 2449-2457.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240672

• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles

Analysis of rice blast resistance in rice varieties from regional trials in Zhejiang Province of China from 2014 to 2023

HAO Zhongna¹(), QIU Haiping¹, CHAI Rongyao¹, HAN Zhanyu², ZHANG Zhen¹, WANG Yanli¹, WANG Jiaoyu¹, LIU Xin²^,^*()

1. Zhejiang National Test Station for Resistance Identification of Crop Variety, Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
2. Seed Management Station of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310020, China

Received:2024-07-23 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2026-01-09

Abstract

Abstract:

From 2014 to 2023, a total of 1 498 new rice varieties from the regional trials in Zhejiang Province were evaluated for resistance to rice blast (including rice leaf and panicle blast), to analyze the resistance levels of new rice varieties in Zhejiang and compare the differences among different types of rice varieties. Rice leaf blast resistance was assessed by artificial inoculation, while panicle blast resistance was evaluated through natural infection in field.The results showed that, except for the disease grade of panicle blast incidence, the average values of disease grade of leaf blast, disease grade of panicle blast loss rate, composite index of rice blast, and the highest disease grade of panicle blast loss rate all indicated a moderate resistance level. The varieties tested in 2018 and 2020 exhibited the best overall blast resistance, while those from 2023 showed the poorest rice leaf blast resistance, and the varieties from 2016 performed the worst in both panicle blast resistance and comprehensive resistance. Among the tested varieties, the moderately resistant type accounted for the largest proportion, followed by the moderately susceptible type. Based on the composite index of rice blast, the compliance rate of the varieties was 94.9%, and the disease resistance rate (including highly resistant, resistant, and moderately resistant varieties) was 57.1%. Based on the highest disease grade of panicle blast loss rate, the compliance rate was 92.9%, and the disease resistance rate was 67.4%. According to the composite index of rice blast, the resistance levels of different types of rice varieties decreased as follows: single-season hybrid indica-japonica rice>early indica rice>single-season hybrid indica rice>continuous cropping hybrid late indica rice>single-season late japonica rice>continuous cropping late japonica rice.

Key words: rice variety, rice blast, resistance, Zhejiang Province, regional trial

CLC Number:

S432

HAO Zhongna, QIU Haiping, CHAI Rongyao, HAN Zhanyu, ZHANG Zhen, WANG Yanli, WANG Jiaoyu, LIU Xin. Analysis of rice blast resistance in rice varieties from regional trials in Zhejiang Province of China from 2014 to 2023[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(12): 2449-2457.

Figures/Tables 7

References 20

[1]	鄂志国, 孙红伟, 林海, 等. 浙江育成和审定水稻品种分析(1980—2019)[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(3): 542-548.
	E Z G, SUN H W, LIN H, et al. Analysis of rice varieties bred and certified in Zhejiang Province, China(1980-2019)[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(3): 542-548. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	施俊生, 王仁杯, 郁晓敏, 等. 浙江省水稻审定品种主要性状分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(6): 865-866, 868.
	SHI J S, WANG R B, YU X M, et al. Character analysis of approval rice varieties in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(6): 865-866, 868. (in Chinese)
[3]	杨仕华, 廖琴, 谷铁城, 等. 南方稻区国家水稻品种区域试验进展及建议[J]. 中国种业, 2009, 12: 12-14.
	YANG S H, LIAO Q, GU T C, et al. Progress and suggestions on regional trials of national rice varieties in southern rice-growing areas[J]. China Seed Industry, 2009, 12: 12-14. (in Chinese)
[4]	郝中娜, 毛雪琴, 柴荣耀, 等. 国家长江中下游稻区品种区域试验籼稻稻瘟病抗性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 152-157.
	HAO Z N, MAO X Q, CHAI R Y, et al. Analysis of resistance to rice blast in indica rice varieties from rice regional trials in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(2): 152-157. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	鄂志国, 程本义, 孙红伟, 等. 近40年我国水稻育成品种分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 523-531.
	E Z G, CHENG B Y, SUN H W, et al. Analysis on Chinese improved rice varieties in recent four decades[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 523-531. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	沈文杰, 陈晴晴, 胡逸群, 等. 安徽省水稻区试品种(系)稻瘟病抗性鉴定和评价[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(6): 1338-1341.
	SHEN W J, CHEN Q Q, HU Y Q, et al. Identification and evaluation of rice blast resistance of rice varieties from regional trials in Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(6): 1338-1341. (in Chinese)
[7]	齐中强, 于俊杰, 张荣胜, 等. 江苏省2016—2020年水稻新品种(系)和主栽品种对稻瘟病的抗病性评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(1): 91-96.
	QI Z Q, YU J J, ZHANG R S, et al. Identification and evaluation of resistance of new rice cultivars(lines) and main cultivars to rice blast in Jiangsu Province from 2016 to 2020[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(1): 91-96. (in Chinese)
[8]	李莉, 刘晓梅, 姜兆远, 等. 2015—2019年吉林省水稻区试品种(系)稻瘟病抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(5): 43-46.
	LI L, LIU X M, JIANG Z Y, et al. Identification and evaluation of blast resistance of rice varieties (lines) in the regional test in Jilin Province from 2015 to 2019[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 45(5): 43-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	姜秀英, 于永梅, 魏松红, 等. 2016—2020年辽宁省水稻区域试验参试品种(系)稻瘟病抗性评述[J]. 北方水稻, 2024, 54(1): 12-16.
	JIANG X Y, YU Y M, WEI S H, et al. Evaluation of resistance to rice blast in rice varieties (lines) from regional trails in Liaoning Province from 2016 to 2020[J]. Northern Rice, 2024, 54(1): 12-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	中华人民共和国农业部.水稻品种试验稻瘟病抗性鉴定与评价技术规程: NY/T 2646—2014[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015.
[11]	陶荣祥, 陈建明, 廖琴. 水稻病虫害田间手册:病虫害鉴别与抗性鉴定[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2006.
[12]	HAO Z N, QIU H P, ZHANG Z, et al. Mass cultivation of conidia of Pyricularia oryzae[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2022, 104: 363-368.
[13]	International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Standard evaluation system for rice (SES)[M]. Manila: IRRI, 2002.
[14]	肖丹凤, 张佩胜, 王玲, 等. 中国稻瘟病菌种群分布及优势生理小种的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 312-320.
	XIAO D F, ZHANG P S, WANG L, et al. Research progress on populations and physiological race distribution of rice blast pathogen(Magnaporthe grisea) in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(3): 312-320. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	ZHU L, SUN J, WU G C, et al. Identification of rice varieties and determination of their geographical origin in China using Raman spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2018, 82: 175-182.
[16]	郝中娜, 张红志, 朱旭东, 等. 籼、粳稻上分离的稻瘟病菌致病性分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 2006, 33(4): 337-340.
	HAO Z N, ZHANG H Z, ZHU X D, et al. Pathogenicity analysis of Magnaporthe grisea derive from indica and japonica rice[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2006, 33(4): 337-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	HAO Z N, ZHANG Z, QIU H P, et al. Differences in pathogenicity and physiologic races between Pyricularia oryzae isolates from indica and japonica rice varieties[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2021, 103: 1141-1146.
[18]	孙漱沅. 水稻稻瘟病及其防治[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1986.
[19]	林建荣, 宋昕蔚, 吴明国, 等. 籼粳超级杂交稻育种技术创新与品种培育[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(2): 207-218.
	LIN J R, SONG X W, WU M G, et al. Breeding technology innovation of indica-japonica super hybrid rice and varietal breeding[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2): 207-218. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	阮晓亮, 石建尧, 陆永法, 等. 浙江省籼粳杂交晚稻品种发展与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(4): 8-12.
	RUAN X L, SHI J Y, LU Y F, et al. Development and prospect of indica-japonica hybrid late rice cultivar in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Rice, 2016, 22(4): 8-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)

年份	菌株来源	菌株编号(生理小种)
Year	Source of strain	Number of strain (physiologic race )
2014	籼稻Indica rice	14-12(ZA₁)、14-24(ZA₉)、14-28(ZB₁)、14-15(ZB₅)、14-22(ZB₁₃)、14-20(ZC₅)、14-27(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	14-36(ZA₁₅)、14-39(ZA₄₁)、14-41(ZA₅₉)、14-32(ZA₆₃)、14-35(ZB₁₅)
2015	籼稻Indica rice	15-173(ZA₁)、15-116(ZA₁₃)、15-133(ZB₁)、15-166(ZB₅)、15-176(ZB₁₃)、15-117(ZC₁₃)、15-143(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	15-114(ZA₃₅)、15-108(ZA₅₁)、15-53(ZB₁)、15-13(ZC₁₅)、15-105(ZD₁)
2016	籼稻Indica rice	16-158(ZA₁)、16-59(ZA₃₃)、16-150(ZB₁)、16-164(ZB₅)、16-163(ZB₁₃)、16-36(ZC₁₃)、16-176(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	16-56(ZA₁₉)、16-174(ZA₅₉)、16-166(ZB₉)、16-82(ZC₁₁)、16-122(ZD₃)
2017	籼稻Indica rice	17-57(ZA₁)、17-49(ZA₅)、17-36(ZA₃₃)、17-1(ZB₁)、17-21(ZB₁₃)、17-20(ZC₁₃)、17-34(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	17-87(ZA₁)、17-63(ZA₃₃)、17-60(ZA₄₉)、17-18(ZC₁₅)、17-54(ZE₃)、17-230(ZF₁)
2018	籼稻Indica rice	18-59(ZA₁)、18-60(ZA₅)、18-65(ZA₉)、18-2(ZB₁)、18-68(ZB₁₃)、18-127(ZC₁₃)、18-13(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	18-51(ZA₁)、18-73(ZA₃₃)、18-75(ZA₄₉)、18-64(ZC₁₅)、18-56(ZD₃)、18-20(ZE₃)、18-11(ZF₁)
2019	籼稻Indica rice	19-12(ZA₃₃)、19-2(ZB₁₃)、19-4(ZC₁₃)、19-3(ZC₁₅)、19-20(ZE₃)
	粳稻Japonica rice	19-28(ZA₁)、19-34(ZA₉)、19-25(ZB₁)、19-37(ZC₁₃)、19-46(ZD₃)、19-54(ZE₃)、19-23(ZG₁)
2020	籼稻Indica rice	20-10(ZB₇)、20-4(ZB₃₂)、20-1(ZC₁₃)、20-13(ZC₁₅)、20-18(ZE₃)
	粳稻Japonica rice	20-20(ZA₁)、20-23(ZA₄₉)、20-27(ZB₂₅)、20-32(ZC₁₅)、20-39(ZE₁)、20-54(ZE₃)、20-33(ZG₁)
2021	籼稻Indica rice	21-20(ZA₃₃)、21-16(ZB₁)、21-100(ZB₉)、21-11(ZB₁₃)、21-9(ZC₁)、21-83(ZC₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	21-145(ZA₁)、21-138(ZA₃₃)、21-148(ZA₄₉)、21-142(ZB₁)、21-164(ZB₁₃)、21-126(ZC₁)、21-135(ZG₁)
2022	籼稻Indica rice	22-28(ZB₁)、22-48(ZB₁₁)、22-41(ZB₁₃)、22-13(ZC₁)、22-6(ZC₁₃)
	粳稻Japonica rice	22-51(ZA₁)、22-73(ZA₃₃)、22-75(ZA₄₉)、22-53(ZB₁)、22-91(ZB₁₃)、22-80(ZC₁)、22-71(ZG₁)
2023	籼稻Indica rice	23-145(ZA₁)、23-160(ZA₁₇)、23-140(ZB₁)、23-164(ZB₃)、23-116(ZB₅)、23-66(ZD₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	23-291(ZA₁)、23-311(ZA₉)、23-329(ZA₁₃)、23-319(ZA₂₅)、23-376(ZB₁)、23-323(ZB₅)

年份	菌株来源	菌株编号(生理小种)
Year	Source of strain	Number of strain (physiologic race )
2014	籼稻Indica rice	14-12(ZA₁)、14-24(ZA₉)、14-28(ZB₁)、14-15(ZB₅)、14-22(ZB₁₃)、14-20(ZC₅)、14-27(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	14-36(ZA₁₅)、14-39(ZA₄₁)、14-41(ZA₅₉)、14-32(ZA₆₃)、14-35(ZB₁₅)
2015	籼稻Indica rice	15-173(ZA₁)、15-116(ZA₁₃)、15-133(ZB₁)、15-166(ZB₅)、15-176(ZB₁₃)、15-117(ZC₁₃)、15-143(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	15-114(ZA₃₅)、15-108(ZA₅₁)、15-53(ZB₁)、15-13(ZC₁₅)、15-105(ZD₁)
2016	籼稻Indica rice	16-158(ZA₁)、16-59(ZA₃₃)、16-150(ZB₁)、16-164(ZB₅)、16-163(ZB₁₃)、16-36(ZC₁₃)、16-176(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	16-56(ZA₁₉)、16-174(ZA₅₉)、16-166(ZB₉)、16-82(ZC₁₁)、16-122(ZD₃)
2017	籼稻Indica rice	17-57(ZA₁)、17-49(ZA₅)、17-36(ZA₃₃)、17-1(ZB₁)、17-21(ZB₁₃)、17-20(ZC₁₃)、17-34(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	17-87(ZA₁)、17-63(ZA₃₃)、17-60(ZA₄₉)、17-18(ZC₁₅)、17-54(ZE₃)、17-230(ZF₁)
2018	籼稻Indica rice	18-59(ZA₁)、18-60(ZA₅)、18-65(ZA₉)、18-2(ZB₁)、18-68(ZB₁₃)、18-127(ZC₁₃)、18-13(ZC₁₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	18-51(ZA₁)、18-73(ZA₃₃)、18-75(ZA₄₉)、18-64(ZC₁₅)、18-56(ZD₃)、18-20(ZE₃)、18-11(ZF₁)
2019	籼稻Indica rice	19-12(ZA₃₃)、19-2(ZB₁₃)、19-4(ZC₁₃)、19-3(ZC₁₅)、19-20(ZE₃)
	粳稻Japonica rice	19-28(ZA₁)、19-34(ZA₉)、19-25(ZB₁)、19-37(ZC₁₃)、19-46(ZD₃)、19-54(ZE₃)、19-23(ZG₁)
2020	籼稻Indica rice	20-10(ZB₇)、20-4(ZB₃₂)、20-1(ZC₁₃)、20-13(ZC₁₅)、20-18(ZE₃)
	粳稻Japonica rice	20-20(ZA₁)、20-23(ZA₄₉)、20-27(ZB₂₅)、20-32(ZC₁₅)、20-39(ZE₁)、20-54(ZE₃)、20-33(ZG₁)
2021	籼稻Indica rice	21-20(ZA₃₃)、21-16(ZB₁)、21-100(ZB₉)、21-11(ZB₁₃)、21-9(ZC₁)、21-83(ZC₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	21-145(ZA₁)、21-138(ZA₃₃)、21-148(ZA₄₉)、21-142(ZB₁)、21-164(ZB₁₃)、21-126(ZC₁)、21-135(ZG₁)
2022	籼稻Indica rice	22-28(ZB₁)、22-48(ZB₁₁)、22-41(ZB₁₃)、22-13(ZC₁)、22-6(ZC₁₃)
	粳稻Japonica rice	22-51(ZA₁)、22-73(ZA₃₃)、22-75(ZA₄₉)、22-53(ZB₁)、22-91(ZB₁₃)、22-80(ZC₁)、22-71(ZG₁)
2023	籼稻Indica rice	23-145(ZA₁)、23-160(ZA₁₇)、23-140(ZB₁)、23-164(ZB₃)、23-116(ZB₅)、23-66(ZD₅)
	粳稻Japonica rice	23-291(ZA₁)、23-311(ZA₉)、23-329(ZA₁₃)、23-319(ZA₂₅)、23-376(ZB₁)、23-323(ZB₅)

病级	抗性类型	单穗损失率	穗瘟发病率	穗瘟损失率	稻瘟病综合指数
Disease grade	Resistance type	Loss rate per panicle/%	Incidence of panicle blast/%	Loss rate of panicle blast/%	Composite index
0	高抗Highly resistant	0	0	0	<0.1
1	抗Resistant	≤5.0	≤5.0	≤5.0	0.1~2.0
3	中抗Moderately resistant	5.1~20.0	5.1~10.0	5.1~15.0	2.1~4.0
5	中感Moderately susceptible	20.1~50.0	10.1~25.0	15.1~30.0	4.1~6.0
7	感Susceptible	50.1~70.0	25.1~50.0	30.1~50.0	6.1~7.5
9	高感Highly susceptible	≥70.1	≥50.1	≥50.1	7.6~9.0

病级	抗性类型	单穗损失率	穗瘟发病率	穗瘟损失率	稻瘟病综合指数
Disease grade	Resistance type	Loss rate per panicle/%	Incidence of panicle blast/%	Loss rate of panicle blast/%	Composite index
0	高抗Highly resistant	0	0	0	<0.1
1	抗Resistant	≤5.0	≤5.0	≤5.0	0.1~2.0
3	中抗Moderately resistant	5.1~20.0	5.1~10.0	5.1~15.0	2.1~4.0
5	中感Moderately susceptible	20.1~50.0	10.1~25.0	15.1~30.0	4.1~6.0
7	感Susceptible	50.1~70.0	25.1~50.0	30.1~50.0	6.1~7.5
9	高感Highly susceptible	≥70.1	≥50.1	≥50.1	7.6~9.0

Analysis of rice blast resistance in rice varieties from regional trials in Zhejiang Province of China from 2014 to 2023

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 20

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

水稻类型 Rice type	每年的水稻品种数量Number of rice varieties in different years										合计 Total
水稻类型 Rice type	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	合计 Total
早籼稻Early indica rice	24	13	12	24	23	25	25	25	25	27	223
单季杂交籼稻Single-season hybrid indica rice	27	37	24	25	34	34	28	36	34	38	317
单季籼粳杂交稻Single-season hybrid indica-japonica rice	26	26	36	24	24	36	39	50	51	51	363
单季晚粳稻Single-season late japonica rice	13	13	14	12	23	26	26	26	25	27	205
连作杂交晚籼稻Continuous cropping hybrid late indica rice	25	28	12	14	13	13	13	14	13	13	158
连作晚粳稻Continuous cropping late japonica rice	12	11	11	12	12	14	12	14	14	14	126
连作籼粳杂交稻Continuous cropping indica-japonica hybrid rice	0	7	0	0	0	0	14	14	13	14	62
特早熟晚粳稻Especially early maturing late japonica rice	7	0	0	0	0	13	12	0	0	0	32
特早熟籼稻Especial early maturing indica rice	0	0	0	0	0	12	0	0	0	0	12
合计Total	134	135	109	111	129	173	169	179	175	184	1 498

[1]	LIU Guomin, ZHENG Xu, LIAO Yujiao, QIN Yexin, QIN Weizhi. Effect of grafting on cold resistance of potato seedlings under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1615-1623.
[2]	WANG Yidi, WANG Jinglei, HU Tianhua, XU Yunmin, BAO Chonglai. Development of molecular markers for clubroot resistance and their application in Brassicaceae breeding [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1272-1284.
[3]	YI Ming, SUN Hong, SHEN Qi, TANG Jiangwu. Research progress on ectopic fermentation system in treatment of fecal residue and waste water of livestock and poultry [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1390-1396.
[4]	WANG Chao, LI Yanjie, NIU Yun, WEN Lianhao, CHEN Jingjing, WU Hongzhi, YANG Yuyong, WU Yandi. Biological characterization of black spot pathogens in Rosa chinensis and evaluation of varietal resistance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1087-1096.
[5]	HU Xinrou, WANG Mei, ZHANG Yafen, CAI Weiming, JIN Qunli. Effect of abiotic stress on growth development and response mechanism of Ganoderma [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1182-1190.
[6]	ZHAO Jiahao, XU Xing, ZHOU Weidong, YANG Hua, ZHAO Xihong, WANG Wen. Characteristics of bacteria community and antibiotic resistance genes in piggery wastewater and surrounding water environment [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(3): 621-632.
[7]	WU Jiaqi, ZHU Xueming, BAO Jiandong, WANG Caoyi, ZHOU Xiaoyu, LI Lin, LIN Fucheng. Research progress on biological control of rice blast [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(3): 736-744.
[8]	GU Xingguo, FANG Qiaokun. Distribution characteristics and value assessment of agricultural heritage systems in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(2): 493-506.
[9]	YANG Zhijian, RUAN Miaohong, LIN Shanshan, LIN Shiqiang, LIAO Sufeng, CHEN Xuanyang. Breeding and growth characteristics of purple sweet potato cultivar Jinshu 20 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(11): 2249-2257.
[10]	XU Wenwu, WANG Zhenzhen, LU Lizhi. Analysis on egg-laying performance and stress resistance of four egg duck breeds [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1773-1778.
[11]	HAN Qingyu, CHENG Linrun, LI Yuehong, QIU Zhiling, HOU Meng, LOU Binggan. Evaluation of resistance to foot rot and analysis of disease resistance related indexes of 60 sweet potato germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1616-1625.
[12]	CHU Tianfen, LEI Ling, LI Qinfeng, WU Ping, HONG Wenjie, ZHENG Weiran. Quality safety risk assessment of watermelon industry in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1153-1160.
[13]	LI Jingjing, LI Chuang, LU Yanan, ZHENG Wenming. Identification and expression analysis of Thionin-like gene family in wheat [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 729-737.
[14]	SONG Peng, LI Lixiang, JIANG Houlong, WANG Ru, LI Hui, ZHAO Pengyu, ZHANG Jun, QIN Pingwei, REN Jiangbo, CHEN Qingming. Effect of application of Brevibacillus laterosporus on potassium content of cured tobacco leaves and physiological characteristics of tobacco plants [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 494-502.
[15]	CHAI Rongyao, YOU Yuxin, QIU Haiping, GUO Junning, ZHANG Zhen, LI Bin, SHEN Shengfa, WANG Yanli. Establishment of sweet potato stem rot resistance identification technology and analysis of germplasm resource resistance [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 569-578.