Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 338-345.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.02.11
• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Nan(), YAN Guochao, HE Yong, ZHU Zhujun(
)
Received:
2022-04-09
Online:
2023-02-25
Published:
2023-03-14
Contact:
ZHU Zhujun
CLC Number:
SUN Nan, YAN Guochao, HE Yong, ZHU Zhujun. Rapid determination of silicon content in Cucurbitaceae leaves by silicon molybdenum blue method[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(2): 338-345.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.02.11
处理 Treatment | 水浴时间 Water bath time/min | 硅钼蓝还原反应时间 Reduction reaction time of silicon molybdenum blue/min |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 2 | 2 |
3 | 3 | 4 |
4 | 4 | 6 |
5 | 5 | 8 |
Table 1 Conditions of silicon molybdenum blue
处理 Treatment | 水浴时间 Water bath time/min | 硅钼蓝还原反应时间 Reduction reaction time of silicon molybdenum blue/min |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 2 | 2 |
3 | 3 | 4 |
4 | 4 | 6 |
5 | 5 | 8 |
水平 Level | 因素Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
S样品种类 Sample kinds | E浸提时间 Extraction time/min | G研磨时间 Grinding time/s | |
1 | 黄瓜Cucumber | 5 | 20 |
2 | 南瓜Pumpkin | 10 | 30 |
3 | 西瓜Watermelon | 15 | 40 |
Table 2 Factors and levels in orthogonal experiment
水平 Level | 因素Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
S样品种类 Sample kinds | E浸提时间 Extraction time/min | G研磨时间 Grinding time/s | |
1 | 黄瓜Cucumber | 5 | 20 |
2 | 南瓜Pumpkin | 10 | 30 |
3 | 西瓜Watermelon | 15 | 40 |
Fig.2 Effects of grinding temperature on determined results Bars marked without the same lowercase letter indicated significant differences at P<0.05. S1, Cucumber; S2, Pumpkin; S3, Watermelon. The same as below.
Fig.3 Effects of water bathing time and silicon molybdenum blue reduction reaction time on determined results A, Water bathing time; B, Silicon molybdenum blue reduction reaction time. W1, Water bathing for 1 min; W2, Water bathing for 2 min; W3, Water bathing for 3 min; W4, Water bathing for 4 min; W5, Water bathing for 5 min. R1, Reduction reaction for 0 min; R2, Reduction reaction for 2 min; R3, Reduction reaction for 4 min; R4, Reduction reaction for 6 min; R5, Reduction reaction for 8 min.
样品种类 Sample kinds | 试验号 Test number | 浸提时间 Extraction time | 研磨时间 Grinding time |
---|---|---|---|
S1 | 1 | E1 | G1 |
2 | E1 | G2 | |
3 | E1 | G3 | |
4 | E2 | G1 | |
5 | E2 | G2 | |
6 | E2 | G3 | |
7 | E3 | G1 | |
8 | E3 | G2 | |
9 | E3 | G3 | |
S2 | 10 | E1 | G1 |
11 | E1 | G2 | |
12 | E1 | G3 | |
13 | E2 | G1 | |
14 | E2 | G2 | |
15 | E2 | G3 | |
16 | E3 | G1 | |
17 | E3 | G2 | |
18 | E3 | G3 | |
S3 | 19 | E1 | G1 |
20 | E1 | G2 | |
21 | E1 | G3 | |
22 | E2 | G1 | |
23 | E2 | G2 | |
24 | E2 | G3 | |
25 | E3 | G1 | |
26 | E3 | G2 | |
27 | E3 | G3 |
Table 3 Full factorial design of experiments
样品种类 Sample kinds | 试验号 Test number | 浸提时间 Extraction time | 研磨时间 Grinding time |
---|---|---|---|
S1 | 1 | E1 | G1 |
2 | E1 | G2 | |
3 | E1 | G3 | |
4 | E2 | G1 | |
5 | E2 | G2 | |
6 | E2 | G3 | |
7 | E3 | G1 | |
8 | E3 | G2 | |
9 | E3 | G3 | |
S2 | 10 | E1 | G1 |
11 | E1 | G2 | |
12 | E1 | G3 | |
13 | E2 | G1 | |
14 | E2 | G2 | |
15 | E2 | G3 | |
16 | E3 | G1 | |
17 | E3 | G2 | |
18 | E3 | G3 | |
S3 | 19 | E1 | G1 |
20 | E1 | G2 | |
21 | E1 | G3 | |
22 | E2 | G1 | |
23 | E2 | G2 | |
24 | E2 | G3 | |
25 | E3 | G1 | |
26 | E3 | G2 | |
27 | E3 | G3 |
试验号 Test number | S样品种类 Sample kinds | E浸提时间 Extraction time | G研磨时间 Grinding time | 硅含量 Si content/(μg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 97.09±0.94 c |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 114.59±1.96 a |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 115.18±2.30 a |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 98.07±0.89 c |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 103.28±0.84 b |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 94.68±3.59 c |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 84.29±1.00 e |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 83.18±1.55 e |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 89.89±0.38 d |
Table 4 Design and results of orthogonal test
试验号 Test number | S样品种类 Sample kinds | E浸提时间 Extraction time | G研磨时间 Grinding time | 硅含量 Si content/(μg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 97.09±0.94 c |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 114.59±1.96 a |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 115.18±2.30 a |
4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 98.07±0.89 c |
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 103.28±0.84 b |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 94.68±3.59 c |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 84.29±1.00 e |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 83.18±1.55 e |
9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 89.89±0.38 d |
变异来源 Sources of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
S样品种类Sample kinds | 8 | 303.247 | 127.384 | 0.008 |
E浸提时间Extraction time | 8 | 36.665 | 15.402 | 0.061 |
G研磨时间Grinding time | 8 | 63.932 | 26.856 | 0.036 |
误差Error | 8 | 2.381 | 0.028 | |
总计Sum | 26 | 124.992 |
Table 5 Analysis of variance of factors
变异来源 Sources of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
S样品种类Sample kinds | 8 | 303.247 | 127.384 | 0.008 |
E浸提时间Extraction time | 8 | 36.665 | 15.402 | 0.061 |
G研磨时间Grinding time | 8 | 63.932 | 26.856 | 0.036 |
误差Error | 8 | 2.381 | 0.028 | |
总计Sum | 26 | 124.992 |
因素 Factor | 硅含量Si content | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/(μg·g-1) | k2/(μg·g-1) | k3/(μg·g-1) | R/(μg·g-1) | 最优水平Optimal level | |
S样品种类Sample kinds | 108.95 | 98.68 | 85.79 | 23.16 | 1 |
E浸提时间Extraction time | 93.15 | 100.35 | 99.92 | 7.2 | 2 |
G研磨时间Grinding time | 91.65 | 100.85 | 100.92 | 9.27 | 3 |
Table 6 Rang analysis of orthogonal test
因素 Factor | 硅含量Si content | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/(μg·g-1) | k2/(μg·g-1) | k3/(μg·g-1) | R/(μg·g-1) | 最优水平Optimal level | |
S样品种类Sample kinds | 108.95 | 98.68 | 85.79 | 23.16 | 1 |
E浸提时间Extraction time | 93.15 | 100.35 | 99.92 | 7.2 | 2 |
G研磨时间Grinding time | 91.65 | 100.85 | 100.92 | 9.27 | 3 |
样品 Sample | 编号 No. | 50 μg·g-1加标量 50 μg·g-1 scalar addition | 100 μg·g-1加标量 100 μg·g-1 scalar addition | 150 μg·g-1加标量 150 μg·g-1 scalar addition | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品硅含量 Si content/ (μg·g-1) | 测定值 Measured value/ (μg·g-1) | 回收率 Rate of recovery/ % | 样品硅含量 Si content/ (μg·g-1) | 测定值 Measured value/ (μg·g-1) | 回收率 Rate of recovery/ % | 样品硅含量 Si content/ (μg·g-1) | 测定值 Measured value/ (μg·g-1) | 回收率 Rate of recovery/ % | ||
黄瓜 | 1 | 116 | 169 | 102 | 116 | 211 | 98 | 116 | 264 | 99 |
Cucumber | 2 | 116 | 163 | 99 | 116 | 207 | 96 | 116 | 260 | 98 |
3 | 116 | 159 | 96 | 116 | 207 | 96 | 116 | 255 | 96 | |
4 | 116 | 154 | 93 | 116 | 214 | 99 | 116 | 272 | 102 | |
5 | 116 | 171 | 103 | 116 | 221 | 103 | 116 | 274 | 103 | |
6 | 116 | 158 | 95 | 116 | 210 | 97 | 116 | 260 | 98 | |
7 | 116 | 160 | 97 | 116 | 210 | 97 | 116 | 269 | 101 | |
8 | 116 | 168 | 101 | 116 | 214 | 99 | 116 | 270 | 102 | |
南瓜 | 1 | 105 | 161 | 104 | 105 | 206 | 100 | 105 | 259 | 102 |
Pumpkin | 2 | 105 | 151 | 98 | 105 | 199 | 97 | 105 | 260 | 102 |
3 | 105 | 148 | 95 | 105 | 210 | 103 | 105 | 263 | 103 | |
4 | 105 | 164 | 106 | 105 | 212 | 103 | 105 | 243 | 95 | |
5 | 105 | 159 | 102 | 105 | 191 | 93 | 105 | 249 | 98 | |
6 | 105 | 161 | 104 | 105 | 206 | 101 | 105 | 255 | 100 | |
7 | 105 | 154 | 100 | 105 | 213 | 104 | 105 | 252 | 99 | |
8 | 105 | 150 | 97 | 105 | 200 | 98 | 105 | 261 | 102 | |
西瓜 | 1 | 89 | 148 | 106 | 89 | 202 | 107 | 89 | 235 | 98 |
Watermelon | 2 | 89 | 150 | 108 | 89 | 203 | 107 | 89 | 240 | 100 |
3 | 89 | 143 | 102 | 89 | 196 | 103 | 89 | 229 | 96 | |
4 | 89 | 144 | 103 | 89 | 201 | 106 | 89 | 235 | 98 | |
5 | 89 | 136 | 98 | 89 | 184 | 97 | 89 | 241 | 101 | |
6 | 89 | 137 | 98 | 89 | 183 | 97 | 89 | 247 | 103 | |
7 | 89 | 140 | 101 | 89 | 199 | 105 | 89 | 230 | 96 | |
8 | 89 | 140 | 101 | 89 | 180 | 95 | 89 | 232 | 97 |
Table 7 Experimental results of recovery rate
样品 Sample | 编号 No. | 50 μg·g-1加标量 50 μg·g-1 scalar addition | 100 μg·g-1加标量 100 μg·g-1 scalar addition | 150 μg·g-1加标量 150 μg·g-1 scalar addition | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品硅含量 Si content/ (μg·g-1) | 测定值 Measured value/ (μg·g-1) | 回收率 Rate of recovery/ % | 样品硅含量 Si content/ (μg·g-1) | 测定值 Measured value/ (μg·g-1) | 回收率 Rate of recovery/ % | 样品硅含量 Si content/ (μg·g-1) | 测定值 Measured value/ (μg·g-1) | 回收率 Rate of recovery/ % | ||
黄瓜 | 1 | 116 | 169 | 102 | 116 | 211 | 98 | 116 | 264 | 99 |
Cucumber | 2 | 116 | 163 | 99 | 116 | 207 | 96 | 116 | 260 | 98 |
3 | 116 | 159 | 96 | 116 | 207 | 96 | 116 | 255 | 96 | |
4 | 116 | 154 | 93 | 116 | 214 | 99 | 116 | 272 | 102 | |
5 | 116 | 171 | 103 | 116 | 221 | 103 | 116 | 274 | 103 | |
6 | 116 | 158 | 95 | 116 | 210 | 97 | 116 | 260 | 98 | |
7 | 116 | 160 | 97 | 116 | 210 | 97 | 116 | 269 | 101 | |
8 | 116 | 168 | 101 | 116 | 214 | 99 | 116 | 270 | 102 | |
南瓜 | 1 | 105 | 161 | 104 | 105 | 206 | 100 | 105 | 259 | 102 |
Pumpkin | 2 | 105 | 151 | 98 | 105 | 199 | 97 | 105 | 260 | 102 |
3 | 105 | 148 | 95 | 105 | 210 | 103 | 105 | 263 | 103 | |
4 | 105 | 164 | 106 | 105 | 212 | 103 | 105 | 243 | 95 | |
5 | 105 | 159 | 102 | 105 | 191 | 93 | 105 | 249 | 98 | |
6 | 105 | 161 | 104 | 105 | 206 | 101 | 105 | 255 | 100 | |
7 | 105 | 154 | 100 | 105 | 213 | 104 | 105 | 252 | 99 | |
8 | 105 | 150 | 97 | 105 | 200 | 98 | 105 | 261 | 102 | |
西瓜 | 1 | 89 | 148 | 106 | 89 | 202 | 107 | 89 | 235 | 98 |
Watermelon | 2 | 89 | 150 | 108 | 89 | 203 | 107 | 89 | 240 | 100 |
3 | 89 | 143 | 102 | 89 | 196 | 103 | 89 | 229 | 96 | |
4 | 89 | 144 | 103 | 89 | 201 | 106 | 89 | 235 | 98 | |
5 | 89 | 136 | 98 | 89 | 184 | 97 | 89 | 241 | 101 | |
6 | 89 | 137 | 98 | 89 | 183 | 97 | 89 | 247 | 103 | |
7 | 89 | 140 | 101 | 89 | 199 | 105 | 89 | 230 | 96 | |
8 | 89 | 140 | 101 | 89 | 180 | 95 | 89 | 232 | 97 |
[1] | MA J F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2004, 50(1): 11-18. |
[2] | 韩科峰, 陈余平, 胡铁军, 等. 硅钙钾镁肥对浙江省酸性水稻土壤的改良效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1): 117-122. |
HAN K F, CHEN Y P, HU T J, et al. Effects of silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer on acid paddy soil improvement in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(1): 117-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 扈晓杰, 朱祝军. 硅对黄瓜白粉病抗性及叶片质外体抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2008, 20(1): 67-71. |
HU X J, ZHU Z J. Effects of silicon on resistance of powdery mildew and the activities of antioxidative enzymes in leaf apoplast of cucumber[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2008, 20(1): 67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 焦云, 舒巧云, 赵秀花. 稀土与硅叶面肥对桃果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(6): 997-999. |
JIAO Y, SHU Q Y, ZHAO X H. Effect of rare earth-silane foliar fertilizers on quality of peach fruit[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(6): 997-999. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 侯双霞, 侯宏涛. 二氧化硅常见测定方法的探讨[J]. 科技视界, 2015(18): 137. |
HOU S X, HOU H T. Discussion on common determination methods of silicon dioxide[J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2015(18): 137. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 胡军, 向成钢, 王长林, 等. 嫁接对不同黄瓜接穗硅和果面蜡粉含量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(2): 16-19. |
HU J, XIANG C G, WANG C L, et al. Effect of rootstock on silicon and fruit surface wax powder content in grafted cucumber[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(2): 16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王华, 熊升伟, 盛强. 硅钼蓝分光光度法测定进口玉米中的二氧化硅[J]. 粮食储藏, 2012, 41(5): 42-44. |
WANG H, XIONG S W, SHENG Q. Determination of silica in import corn by silicon molybdenum blue spectrophotometric[J]. Grain Storage, 2012, 41(5): 42-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 华海霞, 于慧国, 刘德君. 硅钼蓝比色法测定植株中的硅[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(24): 173-174. |
HUA H X, YU H G, LIU D J. Determination of silicon concentration in the plants by colorimetric molybdenum blue method[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013(24): 173-174. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 李换丽. 硅对番茄幼苗抗盐性的影响及机理初探[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015. |
LI H L. The effect and mechanism of exogenous silicon on salt resistance of tomato seedlings[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 梁永超, 陈兴华, 王大平. 水稻植株体内TCA-Si(三氯乙酸溶性硅)含量变化及其分布[J]. 江苏农业学报, 1991, 7(4): 41-43. |
LIANG Y C, CHEN X H, WANG D P. Changes and distribution of TCA-Si (trichloroacetic acid soluble silicon) content in rice plants[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1991, 7(4): 41-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 陈秋娟, 谢微, 韦师. 硅钼蓝-紫外可见分光光度法测定里松温泉水中硅的含量[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(12): 210-214. |
CHEN Q J, XIE W, WEI S. Determination of silicon content in Lisong hot spring water by silicon molybdenum blue UV-visible spectrophotometry[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(12): 210-214. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 杨帆, 李璇, 司升云. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定黄瓜中啶虫脒残留[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2019(24): 70-73. |
YANG F, LI X, SI S Y. Determination of acetamiprid residues in cucumber by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2019(24): 70-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | ZHU Shisong, MA Wanli, ZHAO Lishan, ZHENG Yanmei, ZHENG Xianbo, LU Bibo. Apple leaf image segmentation algorithm based on improved LinkNet [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 202-214. |
[2] | GUO Han, LU Zhou, XU Feifei, LUO Ming, ZHANG Xu. Leaf area index estimation of winter wheat based on global sensitivity analysis and machine learning [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(9): 2020-2031. |
[3] | YANG Ling, SHA Nanjing, PAN Pengju, WU Bozhi. Identification and main biological characteristics of pathogen of Clematis leaf blight in Yunnan [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1449-1456. |
[4] | LI Hanfen, LI Dingli, WANG Ran, MA Chunhui. Effects of different dwarfing interstocks on Whangkumbae pear growth and correlation analysis of graft-compatibility [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1175-1182. |
[5] | TANG Xiao, MA Ming. Antibacterial activity and stability of Extracts of four common rice dumplings leaves [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(6): 1287-1397. |
[6] | TANG Weidong, LIU Zhenwen, LIU Dongsheng, HU Xuehua. Effects of low temperature and weak light stress on leaf area and dry matter of cucumber in greenhouse [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 517-524. |
[7] | CAI Yao, MIAO Yuxuan, WU Hao, WANG Dan. Hyperspectral characteristics and leaf area index (LAI) and SPAD value inversion of winter wheat under elevated CO2 concentration [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(3): 582-589. |
[8] | DUAN Yuanyuan, LIU Xiaohong, WU Jiaqi, GUO Xiaoliang, WANG Fanfan, TANG Tao, YOU Jingmao, GUO Jie. Effects of Magnolia officinalis leaf litter decomposition on growth trait and physiological characteristic of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2358-2367. |
[9] | LIN Yuqing, LU Shengmin, ZHOU Wanyi, XING Jianrong, YANG Ying. Preliminary investigation about structure and probiotic properties of polysaccharides from Dendrobium officinale leaves [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(11): 2504-2511. |
[10] | LI Fang, LIU Xia, HUANG Zheng, HE Yingqin, SONG Qinfei, NIU Suzhen. Change regularity of leaf color of tea plant P113 (Camellia tachangensis F. C. Zhang) by metabolomics [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2121-2131. |
[11] | ZHANG Ziting, HAN Jinyu, ZHANG Donghui, LI Han, LI Mingyuan, DENG Zhiping, SUN Xiaoyong. Anomaly detection of potato, maize and apple leaf diseases based on color moments [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2230-2239. |
[12] | GUO Yang, GUO Junxian, SHI Yong, LI Xuelian, HUANG Hua. SPAD inversion model of cantaloupe canopy leaf based on BiPLS-CARS-PLS [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(10): 2286-2295. |
[13] | XIE Wengang, CHEN Wei, TAN Liqiang, YANG Yang, TANG Qian. Analysis of main biochemical components in new shoots of tea cultivars Emeiwenchun and Chuancha No. 2 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(9): 1592-1601. |
[14] | HUANG Shuchao, HOU Dong, YUE Hongzhong, KONG Weiping, ZHANG Dongqin, LI Yali, HAN Dongrong, XIE Bojie. Effects of three growth promoting bacteria and their mixed microbial agents on growth and quality of lettuce [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(7): 1212-1221. |
[15] | ZHAO Hu, ZHANG Yueting, LIU Yonghua. Effects of sugar content on resistance of tomato leaf to bacterial leaf spot and possible underlying mechanisms [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(6): 1001-1011. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||