Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1881-1890.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240872
• Horticultural Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
LUO Yanglan(
), HUANG Liling, HUANG Shilyu, YAN Yong(
), WANG Canqin
Received:2024-10-16
Online:2025-09-25
Published:2025-10-15
Contact:
YAN Yong
CLC Number:
LUO Yanglan, HUANG Liling, HUANG Shilyu, YAN Yong, WANG Canqin. Optimization of substrate formulation and cultivation techniques for Morchella eximia WSJD-1 in Guangxi region of China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1881-1890.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240872
| 水平 Level | 各因素的质量分数Mass fraction of factors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A)小麦Wheat | (B)木屑Sawdust | (C)谷壳Chaff | (D)KH2PO4 | (E)MgSO4 | (F)腐殖土Muck | |
| -1 | 75 | 5 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 1.5 |
| 1 | 85 | 10 | 5.0 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 2.5 |
Table 1 Plackett-Burman experiments design %
| 水平 Level | 各因素的质量分数Mass fraction of factors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A)小麦Wheat | (B)木屑Sawdust | (C)谷壳Chaff | (D)KH2PO4 | (E)MgSO4 | (F)腐殖土Muck | |
| -1 | 75 | 5 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 1.5 |
| 1 | 85 | 10 | 5.0 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 2.5 |
| 因素 Factor | 各因素的质量分数Mass fraction of factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (A)小麦 Wheat | (B)谷壳 Chaff | (C)KH2PO4 | |
| -1 | 75 | 1 | 0.20 |
| 0 | 80 | 2 | 0.25 |
| 1 | 85 | 3 | 0.30 |
Table 2 Box-Behnken design %
| 因素 Factor | 各因素的质量分数Mass fraction of factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (A)小麦 Wheat | (B)谷壳 Chaff | (C)KH2PO4 | |
| -1 | 75 | 1 | 0.20 |
| 0 | 80 | 2 | 0.25 |
| 1 | 85 | 3 | 0.30 |
| 序号 Number | 各因素的水平Level of factors | 每袋菌核干重 Dry weight of sclerotia per bag/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
| 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 8.010 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 18.045 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 16.112 |
| 4 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 11.254 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 18.981 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 17.012 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 15.548 |
| 8 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 9.784 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 14.002 |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 18.855 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 19.400 |
| 12 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 11.447 |
Table 3 Results of Plackett-Burman design
| 序号 Number | 各因素的水平Level of factors | 每袋菌核干重 Dry weight of sclerotia per bag/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
| 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 8.010 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 18.045 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 16.112 |
| 4 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 11.254 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 18.981 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 17.012 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 15.548 |
| 8 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 9.784 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 14.002 |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 18.855 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 19.400 |
| 12 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 11.447 |
| 项 Term | 效应 Effect | 系数 Coefficient | 系数标准误 Standard error of coefficient | t值 t value | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常量Constant | 14.871 | 0.521 | 28.55 | <0.001 | |
| A | 3.630 | 1.815 | 0.521 | 3.48 | 0.018 |
| B | 0.049 | 0.024 | 0.521 | 0.05 | 0.964 |
| C | -3.984 | -1.992 | 0.521 | -3.82 | 0.012 |
| D | 3.491 | 1.745 | 0.521 | 3.35 | 0.020 |
| E | 1.587 | 0.793 | 0.521 | 1.52 | 0.188 |
| F | 2.640 | 1.320 | 0.521 | 2.53 | 0.052 |
Table 4 Analysis of variance results
| 项 Term | 效应 Effect | 系数 Coefficient | 系数标准误 Standard error of coefficient | t值 t value | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常量Constant | 14.871 | 0.521 | 28.55 | <0.001 | |
| A | 3.630 | 1.815 | 0.521 | 3.48 | 0.018 |
| B | 0.049 | 0.024 | 0.521 | 0.05 | 0.964 |
| C | -3.984 | -1.992 | 0.521 | -3.82 | 0.012 |
| D | 3.491 | 1.745 | 0.521 | 3.35 | 0.020 |
| E | 1.587 | 0.793 | 0.521 | 1.52 | 0.188 |
| F | 2.640 | 1.320 | 0.521 | 2.53 | 0.052 |
| 序号 Number | 质量分数Mass fraction/% | 每袋菌核干重 Dry weight of sclerotia per bag/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小麦 Wheat | 谷壳 Chaff | KH2PO4 | ||
| 1 | 75 | 10 | 0.05 | 15.781 |
| 2 | 77 | 8 | 0.10 | 16.946 |
| 3 | 79 | 6 | 0.15 | 17.633 |
| 4 | 81 | 4 | 0.20 | 18.309 |
| 5 | 83 | 2 | 0.25 | 18.867 |
| 6 | 85 | 1 | 0.30 | 17.801 |
Table 5 Results of the steepest ascent test
| 序号 Number | 质量分数Mass fraction/% | 每袋菌核干重 Dry weight of sclerotia per bag/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小麦 Wheat | 谷壳 Chaff | KH2PO4 | ||
| 1 | 75 | 10 | 0.05 | 15.781 |
| 2 | 77 | 8 | 0.10 | 16.946 |
| 3 | 79 | 6 | 0.15 | 17.633 |
| 4 | 81 | 4 | 0.20 | 18.309 |
| 5 | 83 | 2 | 0.25 | 18.867 |
| 6 | 85 | 1 | 0.30 | 17.801 |
| 试验号 Test number | 各因素的水平 Level of factors | 每袋菌核干重 Dry weight of sclerotia per bag/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.993 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.878 |
| 3 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 16.895 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 14.437 |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 16.279 |
| 6 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 14.146 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.001 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 16.086 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16.988 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.301 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 19.660 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.985 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 15.001 |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 19.900 |
| 15 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17.259 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15.250 |
| 17 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 13.768 |
Table 6 Design and results of response surface experiment
| 试验号 Test number | 各因素的水平 Level of factors | 每袋菌核干重 Dry weight of sclerotia per bag/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.993 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.878 |
| 3 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 16.895 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 14.437 |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 16.279 |
| 6 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 14.146 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.001 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 16.086 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16.988 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.301 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 19.660 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.985 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 15.001 |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 19.900 |
| 15 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 17.259 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15.250 |
| 17 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 13.768 |
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 108.43 | 9 | 12.05 | 34.49 | < 0.000 1 |
| A | 2.72 | 1 | 2.72 | 7.78 | 0.026 9 |
| B | 0.36 | 1 | 0.36 | 1.04 | 0.342 2 |
| C | 28.15 | 1 | 28.15 | 80.59 | < 0.000 1 |
| AB | 2.70 | 1 | 2.70 | 7.73 | 0.027 3 |
| AC | 1.10 | 1 | 1.10 | 3.14 | 0.119 5 |
| BC | 5.89 | 1 | 5.89 | 16.85 | 0.004 5 |
| A2 | 29.28 | 1 | 29.28 | 83.84 | < 0.000 1 |
| B2 | 17.65 | 1 | 17.65 | 50.52 | 0.000 2 |
| C2 | 13.71 | 1 | 13.71 | 39.25 | 0.000 4 |
| 残差Residual | 2.44 | 7 | 0.35 | ||
| 失拟度 | 0.97 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.521 8 |
| Lack of fit | |||||
| 绝对误差 | 1.47 | 4 | 0.37 | ||
| Pure error | |||||
| 总离差 | 110.87 | 16 | |||
| Total variation |
Table 7 Results of variance analysis
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | p值 p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Model | 108.43 | 9 | 12.05 | 34.49 | < 0.000 1 |
| A | 2.72 | 1 | 2.72 | 7.78 | 0.026 9 |
| B | 0.36 | 1 | 0.36 | 1.04 | 0.342 2 |
| C | 28.15 | 1 | 28.15 | 80.59 | < 0.000 1 |
| AB | 2.70 | 1 | 2.70 | 7.73 | 0.027 3 |
| AC | 1.10 | 1 | 1.10 | 3.14 | 0.119 5 |
| BC | 5.89 | 1 | 5.89 | 16.85 | 0.004 5 |
| A2 | 29.28 | 1 | 29.28 | 83.84 | < 0.000 1 |
| B2 | 17.65 | 1 | 17.65 | 50.52 | 0.000 2 |
| C2 | 13.71 | 1 | 13.71 | 39.25 | 0.000 4 |
| 残差Residual | 2.44 | 7 | 0.35 | ||
| 失拟度 | 0.97 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.521 8 |
| Lack of fit | |||||
| 绝对误差 | 1.47 | 4 | 0.37 | ||
| Pure error | |||||
| 总离差 | 110.87 | 16 | |||
| Total variation |
Fig.1 Response surface results of the effects of wheat, chaff, and KH2PO4 mass fraction on the dry weight of Morchella eximia sclerotia A, Wheat mass fraction; B, Chaff mass fraction; C, KH2PO4 mass fraction.
| 播种期 Sowing date | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 4 | 45 | 54 | 65 | 0.383±0.019 e |
| T2 | 5 | 44 | 53 | 66 | 0.485±0.017 d |
| T3 | 5 | 45 | 56 | 66 | 0.584±0.034 c |
| T4 | 7 | 47 | 55 | 68 | 0.703±0.030 a |
| T5 | 7 | 48 | 56 | 68 | 0.716±0.012 a |
| T6 | 9 | 47 | 56 | 67 | 0.661±0.071 b |
| T7 | 9 | 46 | 57 | 67 | 0.436±0.048 d |
| T8 | 12 | 44 | 56 | 68 | 0.423±0.039 d |
Table 8 Growth and yield of Morchella eximia WSJD-1 at different sowing dates
| 播种期 Sowing date | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 4 | 45 | 54 | 65 | 0.383±0.019 e |
| T2 | 5 | 44 | 53 | 66 | 0.485±0.017 d |
| T3 | 5 | 45 | 56 | 66 | 0.584±0.034 c |
| T4 | 7 | 47 | 55 | 68 | 0.703±0.030 a |
| T5 | 7 | 48 | 56 | 68 | 0.716±0.012 a |
| T6 | 9 | 47 | 56 | 67 | 0.661±0.071 b |
| T7 | 9 | 46 | 57 | 67 | 0.436±0.048 d |
| T8 | 12 | 44 | 56 | 68 | 0.423±0.039 d |
| 播种量 Seeding rate | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 7 | 47 | 56 | 67 | 0.689±0.016 a |
| S2 | 6 | 47 | 55 | 66 | 0.677±0.023 a |
| S3 | 7 | 49 | 59 | 68 | 0.514±0.018 b |
Table 9 Growth and yield of Morchella eximia WSJD-1 under different seeding quantity treatments
| 播种量 Seeding rate | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 7 | 47 | 56 | 67 | 0.689±0.016 a |
| S2 | 6 | 47 | 55 | 66 | 0.677±0.023 a |
| S3 | 7 | 49 | 59 | 68 | 0.514±0.018 b |
| 覆膜方式 Mulching method | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 6 | 45 | 54 | 67 | 0.418±0.025 b |
| F2 | 7 | 44 | 53 | 66 | 0.431±0.019 b |
| F3 | 7 | 47 | 55 | 68 | 0.301±0.016 c |
| F4 | 6 | 46 | 56 | 67 | 0.669±0.027 a |
Table 10 Growth and yield of Morchella eximia WSJD-1 under different mulching methods
| 覆膜方式 Mulching method | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 6 | 45 | 54 | 67 | 0.418±0.025 b |
| F2 | 7 | 44 | 53 | 66 | 0.431±0.019 b |
| F3 | 7 | 47 | 55 | 68 | 0.301±0.016 c |
| F4 | 6 | 46 | 56 | 67 | 0.669±0.027 a |
| 处理 Treatment | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) | 病虫害发生程度 Degree of occurrence of pests and diseases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7 | 47 | 56 | 67 | 0.690±0.033 a | + |
| R2 | 7 | 50 | 58 | 68 | 0.365±0.014 b | ++ |
| R3 | 6 | 53 | 64 | 75 | 0.301±0.019 b | +++ |
| R4 | 7 | 57 | 66 | 78 | 0.243±0.023 c | +++ |
Table 11 Growth and yield of Morchella eximia WSJD-1 under different continuous cropping treatments
| 处理 Treatment | 菌丝萌发时间 Mycelium germination time/d | 原基形成时间 Primordium formation time/d | 幼菇出现时间 Young fruiting body emergence time/d | 生育期 Growth period/d | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) | 病虫害发生程度 Degree of occurrence of pests and diseases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7 | 47 | 56 | 67 | 0.690±0.033 a | + |
| R2 | 7 | 50 | 58 | 68 | 0.365±0.014 b | ++ |
| R3 | 6 | 53 | 64 | 75 | 0.301±0.019 b | +++ |
| R4 | 7 | 57 | 66 | 78 | 0.243±0.023 c | +++ |
| [1] | LIU Q Z, MA H S, ZHANG Y, et al. Artificial cultivation of true morels: current state, issues and perspectives[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2018, 38(2): 259-271. |
| [2] | 罗倩, 邹荣灿, 刘明月, 等. 羊肚菌多糖的提取分离纯化及保健功效研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(15): 211-216. |
| LUO Q, ZOU R C, LIU M Y, et al. Research progress of extraction, isolation, purification and health benefits of polysaccharides in Morchella[J]. Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(15): 211-216. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | MEI-HAN, QINGSHAN-WANG, BAIYINTALA, et al. The whole-genome sequence analysis of Morchella sextelata[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 15376. |
| [4] | SUN Y J, HE H Q, WANG Q, et al. A review of development and utilization for edible fungal polysaccharides: extraction, chemical characteristics, and bioactivities[J]. Polymers, 2022, 14(20): 4454. |
| [5] | LI D X, CHENG X, MA F P, et al. Identification of metabolites from edible mushroom Morchella sextelata and their biological evaluation[J]. Natural Product Research, 2023, 37(11): 1774-1781. |
| [6] | DU X H, ZHAO Q, XU J P, et al. High inbreeding, limited recombination and divergent evolutionary patterns between two sympatric morel species in China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 22434. |
| [7] | WU H S, CHEN J, LI J L, et al. Recent advances on bioactive ingredients of Morchella esculenta[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2021, 193(12): 4197-4213. |
| [8] | WANG Z, WANG H L, KANG Z L, et al. Antioxidant and anti-tumour activity of triterpenoid compounds isolated from Morchella mycelium[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2020, 202(7): 1677-1685. |
| [9] | QIAN L J, DU M X, YANG X Y, et al. Microanalysis characterization and immunomodulatory effect for selenium-enriched polysaccharide from Morchella esculenta(L.) pers[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(7): 2885. |
| [10] | SARIKURKCU C, SOLAK M H, TARKOWSKI P, et al. Minerals, phenolics, and biological activity of wild edible mushroom, Morchella steppicola Zerova[J]. Natural Product Research, 2022, 36(23): 6101-6105. |
| [11] | HUO W Y, QI P, CUI L J, et al. Polysaccharide from wild morels alters the spatial structure of gut microbiota and the production of short-chain fatty acids in mice[J]. Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health, 2020, 39(4): 219-226. |
| [12] | GURSOY N, SARIKURKCU C, CENGIZ M, et al. Antioxidant activities, metal contents, total phenolics and flavonoids of seven Morchella species[J]. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2009, 47(9): 2381-2388. |
| [13] | 武彬, 韩建东, 张元祺, 等. 羊肚菌栽培方法优化研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(16): 43-46. |
| WU B, HAN J D, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Optimization of cultivation methods for Morchella[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(16): 43-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 王静之, 柏秋月, 李存玲, 等. 商洛市羊肚菌产业发展现状及发展对策[J]. 食用菌, 2024, 46(3): 85-87. |
| WANG J Z, BAI Q Y, LI C L, et al. Development status and countermeasures of Morchella industry in Shangluo City[J]. Edible Fungi, 2024, 46(3): 85-87. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | 张琳, 王晓东, 赵安平, 等. 北京市羊肚菌产业发展现状及趋势[J]. 农业展望, 2024, 20(3): 76-82. |
| ZHANG L, WANG X D, ZHAO A P, et al. Status quo and trend of Morchella industry development in Beijing[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 2024, 20(3): 76-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 杨仁露, 杨杰仲, 张钦语. ‘黔羊肚菌1号’的生物学特性及大田栽培技术要点[J]. 食药用菌, 2024, 32(4): 277-280. |
| YANG R L, YANG J Z, ZHANG Q Y. Biological characteristic and cultivation techniques in field of ‘Qian Morel No. 1’[J]. Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms, 2024, 32(4): 277-280. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 李书霞, 牛文静, 谢颂朝, 等. 济南市羊肚菌越冬菌株筛选及不同栽培设施对比试验[J]. 中国种业, 2024(7): 136-140. |
| LI S X, NIU W J, XIE S C, et al. Selection experiments of overwintering Morchella strains and comparative experiments of different cultivation facilities in Jinan City[J]. China Seed Industry, 2024(7): 136-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 李文芝, 罗祥英, 李荣春, 等. 昆明地区羊肚菌大棚栽培温湿度条件分析[J]. 中国食用菌, 2024, 43(1): 105-113. |
| LI W Z, LUO X Y, LI R C, et al. Analysis of temperature and humidity conditions for greenhouse cultivation of Morchella in Kunming area[J]. Edible Fungi of China, 2024, 43(1): 105-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 孟祥麟, 赵书雪, 徐丽丽, 等. 羊肚菌的培养基和营养袋配方优化[J]. 中国食用菌, 2022, 41(3): 25-29. |
| MENG X L, ZHAO S X, XU L L, et al. Formula optimizing of medium and nutrient bag of Morchella importuna[J]. Edible Fungi of China, 2022, 41(3): 25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 陈天贵, 陆霞, 彭娟, 等. 羊肚菌在南方栽培的气候适宜性探讨: 以广西柳城种植为例[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2018, 39(3): 57-59. |
| CHEN T G, LU X, PENG J, et al. Climatic suitability of toadstools in Southern China: a case study of Liucheng[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research and Application, 2018, 39(3): 57-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 刘福阳, 王爱仙, 巫仁高, 等. 南方羊肚菌高产栽培技术研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(11): 3199-3205. |
| LIU F Y, WANG A X, WU R G, et al. High-yield cultivation techniques of Morchella spp. in South China[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(11): 3199-3205. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 贾乾义, 胡才科, 吴厚圣, 等. 南方地区羊肚菌高产栽培技术: 江西广昌模式为例[J]. 食用菌, 2023, 45(4): 39-42. |
| JIA Q Y, HU C K, WU H S, et al. High-yield cultivation techniques of Morchella in South China: taking Guangchang model in Jiangxi as an example[J]. Edible Fungi, 2023, 45(4): 39-42. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | DU X H, WU D M, HE G Q, et al. Six new species and two new records of Morchella in China using phylogenetic and morphological analyses[J]. Mycologia, 2019, 111(5): 857-870. |
| [24] | 朱丹, 冯锐, 刘鹏, 等. 宁夏地区设施羊肚菌与麒麟瓜轮作高效栽培技术[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(15): 152-155. |
| ZHU D, FENG R, LIU P, et al. Efficient cultivation techniques for rotation of morels and Qilin watermelon in Ningxia Region[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2024(15): 152-155. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 果禹鑫, 降玉清, 陈青君, 等. 北京地区羊肚菌栽培适应性研究[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2020, 35(3): 33-39. |
| GUO Y X, JIANG Y Q, CHEN Q J, et al. Research on cultivation adaptability of Morchella in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2020, 35(3): 33-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 代俊杰, 黎智文, 李晓. 响应面法优化羊肚菌栽培种培养基[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(24): 8162-8167. |
| DAI J J, LI Z W, LI X. Optimization of Morchella cultivars medium by response surface methodology[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(24): 8162-8167. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 陈留根, 刘红江, 沈明星, 等. 不同播种方式对小麦产量形成的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015, 31(4): 786-791. |
| CHEN L G, LIU H J, SHEN M X, et al. Effects of different seeding modes on grain yield formation of wheat[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 31(4): 786-791. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 马鑫旺. 湖南地区羊肚菌品种筛选与栽培关键技术研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2021. |
| MA X W. Screening of Morchella varieties in Hunan Province and study on key cultivation techniques[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 段丹, 林川, 张宇, 等. 羊肚菌连作障碍成因及防控技术研究进展[J]. 蔬菜, 2023(11): 30-34. |
| DUAN D, LIN C, ZHANG Y, et al. Research progress on the causes and technologies of control of continuous cropping obstacle of Morchella[J]. Vegetables, 2023(11): 30-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 康超, 曾维军, 郑旋, 等. 羊肚菌对覆土层理化性质、微生物多样性及群落结构的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(14): 221-228. |
| KANG C, ZENG W J, ZHENG X, et al. Impacts of Morchella on physicochemical properties, microbial diversity and community structure of overburden soil layer[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(14): 221-228. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 李雪松, 孙达锋, 华蓉, 等. 羊肚菌连作障碍土壤中病原微生物多样性分析[J]. 中国食用菌, 2024, 43(3): 96-106. |
| LI X S, SUN D F, HUA R, et al. Soil pathogenic microbial diversity analysis of Morchella spp. continuous cropping obstacle[J]. Edible Fungi of China, 2024, 43(3): 96-106. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 邱宇辰, 杨文杰, 王子瑄, 等. 陕西省城固县羊肚菌产业发展问题及对策[J]. 山西农经, 2024(14): 154-156. |
| QIU Y C, YANG W J, WANG Z X, et al. Problems and countermeasures of Morchella industry development in Chenggu County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2024(14): 154-156. (in Chinese) | |
| [33] | 蔡小艳, 史静, 王建文, 等. 广西冬闲田豆-禾牧草混播组合的遴选试验研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019(9): 122-125. |
| CAI X Y, SHI J, WANG J W, et al. Experimental study on selection of mixed sowing combination of bean and grass in winter fallow field in Guangxi[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2019(9): 122-125. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | GONG Na, LIU Guoli, CHEN Xun, MA Xiaoying, ZHAO Ying, XIAO Jun. Identification of a wild strain of Pleurotus pulmonarius and optimization of its liquid fermentation culture medium [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(11): 2535-2545. |
| [2] | MA Yihu, ZENG Xiaoyuan, HE Xianbiao, ZHOU Naidi, CHEN Jian. Response of grain yield and quality of high quality rice to climate factors at different sowing dates in southeastern Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(4): 736-751. |
| [3] | ZHANG Hongmei, WANG Baojun, SHEN Yaqiang, CHENG Wangda. Response of yield and quality of high-quality japonica rice with different grain shapes to regulation of sowing date in northern Zhejiang, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(12): 2751-2762. |
| [4] | YOU Cuicui, HE Yizhe, XU Peng, HUANG Yaru, WANG Hui, HE Haibing, KE Jian, WU Liquan. Injury effect of high temperature stress on growth and development of rice and its defense countermeasures [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(1): 10-22. |
| [5] | YE Ying, ZHAO Kaocheng, MA Jun, ZHU Ke, ZHUANG Hengyang. Effects of sowing date and nitrogen application rate on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of rice variety Nanjing 9108 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(5): 879-886. |
| [6] | WANG Tangang, SUN Ting, WANG Jichuan, LI Huiqin, GAO Zhen, SHI Yuanqiang. Effects of sowing date and density on population structure and lodging resistance of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 193-202. |
| [7] | SHEN Zhiguo, SUN Meng, DING Xin, CHENG Jianming, CHEN Dixin. Effects of different culture medium composition on pollen germination and pollen tube growth of 5 strains of Chimonanthus praecox [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 278-287. |
| [8] | LI Jinwu, YU Jihua, LYU Jian, FENG Zhi, YANG Haixing, CHE Xusheng, QIN Qijie, ZHANG Yang, JIN Ning. Effects of different mulching methods on yield, quality and soil nutrients of open-air loose-curd cauliflower on plateau in summer [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633. |
| [9] | YAO Jun\|meng1,2, LI Ying\|chun2, ZHANG Jin\|en2, SHU Ting3, LU Kui\|dong4. Effects of sowing date and temperature on growth and yield of late rice Yueyou 9113 [J]. , 2015, 27(5): 718-. |
| [10] | HU Gulang;XUE Zhankui;YAN Chuan;FANG Yuwei;WANG Xueqin;DING Xianghai;*. Effects of sowing date, seedling age and nitrogen application on the yield and production characteristics of hybrid japonica rice Chunyou 84 [J]. , 2014, 26(3): 0-564569. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||