Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 1517-1528.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250285
• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Wei1(
), MA Xiansen1, NIE Hongyan1, SONG Zhihao1, ZHOU Yi1, CHEN Guangxun1, CHEN Zhengwu2,*(
)
Received:2025-04-07
Online:2026-08-25
Published:2026-09-14
CLC Number:
GUO Wei, MA Xiansen, NIE Hongyan, SONG Zhihao, ZHOU Yi, CHEN Guangxun, CHEN Zhengwu. Diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of biochemical components of 35 accessions of tea plants in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1517-1528.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20250285
| 生化成分 Biochemical component | 含量/(mg·g-1) Content/(mg·g-1) | CV/% | H' |
|---|---|---|---|
| TB | 9.34±2.64 | 28.32 | 1.74 |
| TP | 0.13±0.06 | 46.58 | 1.90 |
| CAF | 33.78±4.91 | 14.55 | 1.91 |
| GA | 0.51±0.15 | 28.32 | 1.88 |
| EGC | 14.76±3.57 | 24.18 | 2.00 |
| C | 0.49±0.11 | 21.34 | 1.83 |
| EC | 6.82±1.81 | 26.54 | 2.00 |
| EGCG | 56.68±13.01 | 22.95 | 1.78 |
| GCG | 7.80±3.95 | 50.66 | 0.66 |
| ECG | 18.79±6.77 | 36.04 | 1.77 |
| TC | 105.35±19.33 | 18.35 | 1.91 |
| THE | 28.87±5.96 | 20.65 | 1.76 |
| ASP | 2.48±0.82 | 33.12 | 1.79 |
| SER | 1.18±0.28 | 23.67 | 1.96 |
| GLU | 5.31±1.71 | 32.19 | 1.66 |
| GLY | 0.09±0.04 | 48.34 | 1.84 |
| HIS | 4.87±2.66 | 54.71 | 1.82 |
| ARG | 6.00±3.00 | 50.02 | 1.98 |
| THR | 0.15±0.11 | 69.19 | 1.88 |
| ALA | 0.26±0.16 | 63.44 | 1.90 |
| PRO | 1.18±0.46 | 38.73 | 1.91 |
| CYS | 0.01±0.01 | 117.40 | 1.60 |
| TYR | 0.06±0.05 | 79.75 | 1.73 |
| VAL | 3.41±1.27 | 37.27 | 2.01 |
| MET | 0.16±0.11 | 66.27 | 1.84 |
| LYS | 0.08±0.06 | 81.58 | 1.80 |
| LEU | 0.14±0.06 | 44.05 | 1.63 |
| PHE | 0.24±0.06 | 26.90 | 2.09 |
Table 1 Biochemical components content and Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') of tested materials
| 生化成分 Biochemical component | 含量/(mg·g-1) Content/(mg·g-1) | CV/% | H' |
|---|---|---|---|
| TB | 9.34±2.64 | 28.32 | 1.74 |
| TP | 0.13±0.06 | 46.58 | 1.90 |
| CAF | 33.78±4.91 | 14.55 | 1.91 |
| GA | 0.51±0.15 | 28.32 | 1.88 |
| EGC | 14.76±3.57 | 24.18 | 2.00 |
| C | 0.49±0.11 | 21.34 | 1.83 |
| EC | 6.82±1.81 | 26.54 | 2.00 |
| EGCG | 56.68±13.01 | 22.95 | 1.78 |
| GCG | 7.80±3.95 | 50.66 | 0.66 |
| ECG | 18.79±6.77 | 36.04 | 1.77 |
| TC | 105.35±19.33 | 18.35 | 1.91 |
| THE | 28.87±5.96 | 20.65 | 1.76 |
| ASP | 2.48±0.82 | 33.12 | 1.79 |
| SER | 1.18±0.28 | 23.67 | 1.96 |
| GLU | 5.31±1.71 | 32.19 | 1.66 |
| GLY | 0.09±0.04 | 48.34 | 1.84 |
| HIS | 4.87±2.66 | 54.71 | 1.82 |
| ARG | 6.00±3.00 | 50.02 | 1.98 |
| THR | 0.15±0.11 | 69.19 | 1.88 |
| ALA | 0.26±0.16 | 63.44 | 1.90 |
| PRO | 1.18±0.46 | 38.73 | 1.91 |
| CYS | 0.01±0.01 | 117.40 | 1.60 |
| TYR | 0.06±0.05 | 79.75 | 1.73 |
| VAL | 3.41±1.27 | 37.27 | 2.01 |
| MET | 0.16±0.11 | 66.27 | 1.84 |
| LYS | 0.08±0.06 | 81.58 | 1.80 |
| LEU | 0.14±0.06 | 44.05 | 1.63 |
| PHE | 0.24±0.06 | 26.90 | 2.09 |
Fig.1 Heat map of correlation analysis of biochemical components TB, Theobromine; TP, Theophylline; CAF, Caffeine; GA, Gallic acid;EGC, Epigallocatechin; C, Catechin; EC, Epicatechin; EGCG, Epigallocatechin gallate; GCG, Gallocatechin gallate; ECG, Epicatechin gallate; TC, Total catechins; THE, Theanine; ASP, Aspartic acid; SER, Serine; GLU, Glutamate; GLY, Glycine; HIS, Histidine; ARG, Arginine; THR, Threonine; ALA, Alanine; PRO, Proline; CYS, Cysteine; TYR, Tyrosine; VAL, Valine; MET, Methionine; LYS, Lysine; LEU, Leucine; PHE, Phenylalanine. The same as below. “*” and “**” indicate significant correlation at p<0.05 and p<0.01 level, respectively.
| 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 方差贡献率/% Variance contribution rate/% | 累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.429 | 30.101 | 30.101 |
| 2 | 4.218 | 15.066 | 45.167 |
| 3 | 2.611 | 9.325 | 54.492 |
| 4 | 2.318 | 8.280 | 62.772 |
| 5 | 1.921 | 6.862 | 69.634 |
| 6 | 1.428 | 5.099 | 74.733 |
| 7 | 1.041 | 3.717 | 78.451 |
Table 2 Eigenvalues of principal components and variance contribution rate
| 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 方差贡献率/% Variance contribution rate/% | 累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.429 | 30.101 | 30.101 |
| 2 | 4.218 | 15.066 | 45.167 |
| 3 | 2.611 | 9.325 | 54.492 |
| 4 | 2.318 | 8.280 | 62.772 |
| 5 | 1.921 | 6.862 | 69.634 |
| 6 | 1.428 | 5.099 | 74.733 |
| 7 | 1.041 | 3.717 | 78.451 |
| 生化成分 Biochemical component | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | |
| TB | -0.571 | -0.068 | 0.466 | 0.110 | -0.276 | -0.106 | -0.061 | -0.026 | 0.270 | 0.140 | -0.039 | -0.027 | -0.022 | -0.021 |
| TP | -0.627 | -0.074 | 0.223 | 0.053 | -0.098 | -0.037 | 0.119 | 0.051 | 0.104 | 0.054 | -0.009 | -0.006 | -0.094 | -0.090 |
| CAF | -0.639 | -0.076 | 0.351 | 0.083 | 0.426 | 0.163 | -0.022 | -0.009 | 0.030 | 0.016 | 0.074 | 0.052 | -0.081 | -0.078 |
| GA | -0.263 | -0.031 | 0.576 | 0.136 | 0.035 | 0.013 | -0.211 | -0.091 | 0.107 | 0.056 | 0.047 | 0.033 | 0.316 | 0.304 |
| EGC | -0.194 | -0.023 | -0.564 | -0.134 | 0.649 | 0.249 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.169 | 0.088 | -0.017 | -0.012 | -0.110 | -0.105 |
| C | -0.543 | -0.064 | 0.316 | 0.075 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.276 | 0.119 | -0.440 | -0.229 | -0.206 | -0.145 | 0.247 | 0.238 |
| EC | -0.027 | -0.003 | -0.127 | -0.030 | 0.481 | 0.184 | 0.643 | 0.277 | 0.167 | 0.087 | -0.135 | -0.094 | 0.317 | 0.305 |
| EGCG | -0.813 | -0.096 | 0.155 | 0.037 | 0.154 | 0.059 | 0.044 | 0.019 | -0.039 | -0.020 | 0.229 | 0.160 | -0.230 | -0.221 |
| GCG | -0.198 | -0.024 | 0.177 | 0.042 | -0.495 | -0.189 | -0.135 | -0.058 | 0.574 | 0.299 | 0.318 | 0.222 | -0.105 | -0.101 |
| ECG | -0.719 | -0.085 | 0.550 | 0.130 | -0.033 | -0.013 | 0.256 | 0.110 | 0.090 | 0.047 | -0.184 | -0.129 | 0.107 | 0.103 |
| TC | -0.881 | -0.105 | 0.219 | 0.052 | 0.156 | 0.060 | 0.156 | 0.067 | 0.167 | 0.087 | 0.138 | 0.097 | -0.128 | -0.123 |
| THE | 0.689 | 0.082 | -0.027 | -0.006 | -0.127 | -0.048 | 0.363 | 0.157 | 0.040 | 0.021 | -0.299 | -0.209 | -0.067 | -0.065 |
| ASP | 0.513 | 0.061 | 0.115 | 0.027 | -0.037 | -0.014 | 0.486 | 0.210 | -0.186 | -0.097 | 0.419 | 0.294 | 0.237 | 0.227 |
| SER | 0.610 | 0.072 | 0.676 | 0.160 | -0.002 | -0.001 | 0.089 | 0.039 | -0.011 | -0.006 | -0.165 | -0.115 | -0.014 | -0.014 |
| GLU | 0.756 | 0.090 | 0.145 | 0.034 | -0.065 | -0.025 | 0.350 | 0.151 | -0.242 | -0.126 | 0.171 | 0.120 | -0.013 | -0.013 |
| GLY | 0.146 | 0.017 | -0.278 | -0.066 | 0.610 | 0.233 | 0.254 | 0.109 | 0.486 | 0.253 | 0.273 | 0.191 | 0.055 | 0.052 |
| HIS | 0.625 | 0.074 | 0.198 | 0.047 | -0.260 | -0.100 | 0.440 | 0.190 | -0.153 | -0.080 | 0.263 | 0.184 | -0.281 | -0.270 |
| ARG | 0.848 | 0.101 | 0.172 | 0.041 | -0.034 | -0.013 | -0.042 | -0.018 | 0.266 | 0.138 | 0.089 | 0.062 | -0.120 | -0.116 |
| THR | 0.503 | 0.060 | 0.733 | 0.174 | -0.057 | -0.022 | -0.030 | -0.013 | 0.035 | 0.018 | 0.054 | 0.038 | -0.033 | -0.031 |
| ALA | 0.543 | 0.064 | 0.536 | 0.127 | -0.033 | -0.013 | 0.276 | 0.119 | 0.278 | 0.145 | -0.172 | -0.120 | -0.184 | -0.177 |
| PRO | -0.398 | -0.047 | 0.305 | 0.072 | 0.300 | 0.115 | 0.454 | 0.196 | -0.269 | -0.140 | 0.458 | 0.321 | -0.072 | -0.070 |
| CYS | 0.303 | 0.036 | -0.028 | -0.007 | -0.232 | -0.089 | -0.030 | -0.013 | 0.563 | 0.293 | 0.246 | 0.172 | 0.572 | 0.550 |
| TYR | 0.343 | 0.041 | 0.519 | 0.123 | 0.497 | 0.190 | -0.391 | -0.169 | -0.046 | -0.024 | 0.053 | 0.037 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| VAL | 0.275 | 0.033 | -0.263 | -0.062 | 0.130 | 0.050 | 0.422 | 0.182 | 0.421 | 0.219 | -0.462 | -0.324 | -0.199 | -0.191 |
| MET | -0.611 | -0.072 | 0.553 | 0.131 | -0.074 | -0.028 | 0.254 | 0.110 | 0.075 | 0.039 | -0.326 | -0.229 | 0.058 | 0.056 |
| LYS | 0.431 | 0.051 | 0.476 | 0.113 | 0.473 | 0.181 | -0.244 | -0.105 | 0.191 | 0.099 | -0.125 | -0.088 | -0.018 | -0.018 |
| LEU | 0.466 | 0.055 | 0.460 | 0.109 | 0.440 | 0.168 | -0.283 | -0.122 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.121 | 0.085 | -0.169 | -0.162 |
| PHE | 0.569 | 0.067 | 0.140 | 0.033 | 0.316 | 0.121 | -0.278 | -0.120 | -0.308 | -0.161 | -0.151 | -0.106 | 0.247 | 0.238 |
Table 3 Loadings(Lo) and score coefficients(SC) of each biochemical component on principal components
| 生化成分 Biochemical component | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | Lo | SC | |
| TB | -0.571 | -0.068 | 0.466 | 0.110 | -0.276 | -0.106 | -0.061 | -0.026 | 0.270 | 0.140 | -0.039 | -0.027 | -0.022 | -0.021 |
| TP | -0.627 | -0.074 | 0.223 | 0.053 | -0.098 | -0.037 | 0.119 | 0.051 | 0.104 | 0.054 | -0.009 | -0.006 | -0.094 | -0.090 |
| CAF | -0.639 | -0.076 | 0.351 | 0.083 | 0.426 | 0.163 | -0.022 | -0.009 | 0.030 | 0.016 | 0.074 | 0.052 | -0.081 | -0.078 |
| GA | -0.263 | -0.031 | 0.576 | 0.136 | 0.035 | 0.013 | -0.211 | -0.091 | 0.107 | 0.056 | 0.047 | 0.033 | 0.316 | 0.304 |
| EGC | -0.194 | -0.023 | -0.564 | -0.134 | 0.649 | 0.249 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.169 | 0.088 | -0.017 | -0.012 | -0.110 | -0.105 |
| C | -0.543 | -0.064 | 0.316 | 0.075 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.276 | 0.119 | -0.440 | -0.229 | -0.206 | -0.145 | 0.247 | 0.238 |
| EC | -0.027 | -0.003 | -0.127 | -0.030 | 0.481 | 0.184 | 0.643 | 0.277 | 0.167 | 0.087 | -0.135 | -0.094 | 0.317 | 0.305 |
| EGCG | -0.813 | -0.096 | 0.155 | 0.037 | 0.154 | 0.059 | 0.044 | 0.019 | -0.039 | -0.020 | 0.229 | 0.160 | -0.230 | -0.221 |
| GCG | -0.198 | -0.024 | 0.177 | 0.042 | -0.495 | -0.189 | -0.135 | -0.058 | 0.574 | 0.299 | 0.318 | 0.222 | -0.105 | -0.101 |
| ECG | -0.719 | -0.085 | 0.550 | 0.130 | -0.033 | -0.013 | 0.256 | 0.110 | 0.090 | 0.047 | -0.184 | -0.129 | 0.107 | 0.103 |
| TC | -0.881 | -0.105 | 0.219 | 0.052 | 0.156 | 0.060 | 0.156 | 0.067 | 0.167 | 0.087 | 0.138 | 0.097 | -0.128 | -0.123 |
| THE | 0.689 | 0.082 | -0.027 | -0.006 | -0.127 | -0.048 | 0.363 | 0.157 | 0.040 | 0.021 | -0.299 | -0.209 | -0.067 | -0.065 |
| ASP | 0.513 | 0.061 | 0.115 | 0.027 | -0.037 | -0.014 | 0.486 | 0.210 | -0.186 | -0.097 | 0.419 | 0.294 | 0.237 | 0.227 |
| SER | 0.610 | 0.072 | 0.676 | 0.160 | -0.002 | -0.001 | 0.089 | 0.039 | -0.011 | -0.006 | -0.165 | -0.115 | -0.014 | -0.014 |
| GLU | 0.756 | 0.090 | 0.145 | 0.034 | -0.065 | -0.025 | 0.350 | 0.151 | -0.242 | -0.126 | 0.171 | 0.120 | -0.013 | -0.013 |
| GLY | 0.146 | 0.017 | -0.278 | -0.066 | 0.610 | 0.233 | 0.254 | 0.109 | 0.486 | 0.253 | 0.273 | 0.191 | 0.055 | 0.052 |
| HIS | 0.625 | 0.074 | 0.198 | 0.047 | -0.260 | -0.100 | 0.440 | 0.190 | -0.153 | -0.080 | 0.263 | 0.184 | -0.281 | -0.270 |
| ARG | 0.848 | 0.101 | 0.172 | 0.041 | -0.034 | -0.013 | -0.042 | -0.018 | 0.266 | 0.138 | 0.089 | 0.062 | -0.120 | -0.116 |
| THR | 0.503 | 0.060 | 0.733 | 0.174 | -0.057 | -0.022 | -0.030 | -0.013 | 0.035 | 0.018 | 0.054 | 0.038 | -0.033 | -0.031 |
| ALA | 0.543 | 0.064 | 0.536 | 0.127 | -0.033 | -0.013 | 0.276 | 0.119 | 0.278 | 0.145 | -0.172 | -0.120 | -0.184 | -0.177 |
| PRO | -0.398 | -0.047 | 0.305 | 0.072 | 0.300 | 0.115 | 0.454 | 0.196 | -0.269 | -0.140 | 0.458 | 0.321 | -0.072 | -0.070 |
| CYS | 0.303 | 0.036 | -0.028 | -0.007 | -0.232 | -0.089 | -0.030 | -0.013 | 0.563 | 0.293 | 0.246 | 0.172 | 0.572 | 0.550 |
| TYR | 0.343 | 0.041 | 0.519 | 0.123 | 0.497 | 0.190 | -0.391 | -0.169 | -0.046 | -0.024 | 0.053 | 0.037 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| VAL | 0.275 | 0.033 | -0.263 | -0.062 | 0.130 | 0.050 | 0.422 | 0.182 | 0.421 | 0.219 | -0.462 | -0.324 | -0.199 | -0.191 |
| MET | -0.611 | -0.072 | 0.553 | 0.131 | -0.074 | -0.028 | 0.254 | 0.110 | 0.075 | 0.039 | -0.326 | -0.229 | 0.058 | 0.056 |
| LYS | 0.431 | 0.051 | 0.476 | 0.113 | 0.473 | 0.181 | -0.244 | -0.105 | 0.191 | 0.099 | -0.125 | -0.088 | -0.018 | -0.018 |
| LEU | 0.466 | 0.055 | 0.460 | 0.109 | 0.440 | 0.168 | -0.283 | -0.122 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.121 | 0.085 | -0.169 | -0.162 |
| PHE | 0.569 | 0.067 | 0.140 | 0.033 | 0.316 | 0.121 | -0.278 | -0.120 | -0.308 | -0.161 | -0.151 | -0.106 | 0.247 | 0.238 |
| 材料Material | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F | 排名Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT-AS-70 | -10.92 | 11.29 | 11.71 | 21.37 | 12.80 | 9.19 | -25.68 | 2.14 | 1 |
| GT-AS-83 | -12.92 | 12.07 | 12.45 | 22.52 | 14.00 | 11.22 | -29.21 | 1.80 | 2 |
| GT-AS-79 | -13.76 | 11.81 | 14.09 | 20.16 | 15.94 | 10.56 | -29.70 | 1.47 | 3 |
| GT-AS-81 | -14.44 | 11.89 | 14.53 | 20.50 | 13.87 | 13.70 | -28.50 | 1.40 | 4 |
| GT-AS-62 | -10.79 | 8.99 | 11.66 | 18.55 | 12.66 | 9.39 | -27.38 | 1.36 | 5 |
| HJY-F1-73 | -10.52 | 8.72 | 11.75 | 16.15 | 12.57 | 9.08 | -24.86 | 1.26 | 6 |
| E-38-7 | -11.50 | 9.76 | 11.38 | 16.07 | 12.00 | 11.05 | -23.81 | 1.16 | 7 |
| GT-AS-57 | -13.87 | 11.36 | 14.16 | 17.08 | 13.55 | 12.23 | -26.38 | 1.08 | 8 |
| GT-GY-05 | -14.31 | 12.40 | 13.13 | 18.39 | 14.25 | 11.73 | -28.10 | 1.08 | 9 |
| GT-AS-72 | -14.26 | 10.11 | 15.18 | 19.76 | 14.70 | 11.36 | -28.40 | 1.05 | 10 |
| HJY-F1-107 | -15.81 | 13.12 | 11.99 | 18.08 | 13.75 | 19.37 | -31.87 | 0.75 | 11 |
| HJY-F1-102 | -18.03 | 11.32 | 19.85 | 19.67 | 17.72 | 13.97 | -30.22 | 0.73 | 12 |
| GT-AS-82 | -16.17 | 10.77 | 16.72 | 18.16 | 16.02 | 11.11 | -26.39 | 0.65 | 13 |
| HJY-F1-76 | -14.40 | 10.43 | 13.88 | 16.98 | 14.74 | 10.56 | -26.67 | 0.64 | 14 |
| GT-AS-19 | -19.52 | 13.98 | 17.73 | 20.40 | 17.07 | 14.80 | -29.52 | 0.52 | 15 |
| HJY-F1-55 | -16.55 | 11.19 | 15.43 | 19.06 | 14.85 | 12.53 | -26.89 | 0.49 | 16 |
| GZL | -17.93 | 14.43 | 14.58 | 18.95 | 14.28 | 13.93 | -27.61 | 0.48 | 17 |
| GT-AS-77 | -15.62 | 10.49 | 15.50 | 16.40 | 14.58 | 11.46 | -27.80 | 0.31 | 18 |
| GT-DZ-06 | -17.12 | 10.70 | 16.24 | 18.47 | 14.19 | 16.10 | -29.54 | 0.26 | 19 |
| HJY-F1-23 | -16.00 | 10.72 | 15.55 | 15.73 | 14.46 | 14.96 | -30.52 | 0.23 | 20 |
| HJY-F1-8 | -16.92 | 11.71 | 15.58 | 16.02 | 14.79 | 15.78 | -30.43 | 0.19 | 21 |
| NW2 | -18.75 | 14.12 | 14.96 | 18.80 | 15.06 | 15.89 | -31.81 | 0.13 | 22 |
| GT-AS-58 | -16.11 | 11.39 | 13.60 | 15.79 | 14.22 | 14.52 | -29.03 | 0.11 | 23 |
| HJY-F1-64 | -16.59 | 10.57 | 15.78 | 16.08 | 14.31 | 15.82 | -30.78 | 0.07 | 24 |
| ZN21 | -19.73 | 15.04 | 15.17 | 18.44 | 16.25 | 15.24 | -30.66 | 0.03 | 25 |
| QC1 | -20.53 | 15.52 | 17.22 | 17.26 | 15.75 | 19.72 | -34.20 | 0.02 | 26 |
| GT-CR-29 | -22.10 | 17.08 | 10.62 | 18.33 | 25.71 | 21.72 | -36.04 | -0.05 | 27 |
| KM-F1-03 | -20.52 | 12.74 | 19.62 | 19.36 | 17.21 | 14.87 | -33.25 | -0.15 | 28 |
| MT0801 | -22.26 | 17.37 | 14.45 | 20.25 | 17.62 | 13.74 | -28.13 | -0.24 | 29 |
| GT-AS-55 | -20.90 | 13.70 | 17.33 | 17.87 | 16.05 | 15.69 | -31.18 | -0.49 | 30 |
| NW1 | -25.02 | 16.50 | 21.42 | 20.79 | 18.04 | 20.46 | -36.43 | -0.50 | 31 |
| YGS0840 | -25.60 | 16.01 | 21.60 | 21.89 | 18.81 | 20.70 | -37.63 | -0.65 | 32 |
| GT-LP-22 | -22.88 | 14.74 | 18.18 | 19.40 | 17.27 | 17.79 | -33.90 | -0.67 | 33 |
| GT-LP-55 | -30.71 | 20.61 | 22.42 | 24.97 | 21.24 | 24.83 | -46.14 | -1.23 | 34 |
| ZK | -28.35 | 16.50 | 23.02 | 18.49 | 17.78 | 26.48 | -39.44 | -1.60 | 35 |
Table 4 Comprehensive scores and rankings of principal component analysis
| 材料Material | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F | 排名Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT-AS-70 | -10.92 | 11.29 | 11.71 | 21.37 | 12.80 | 9.19 | -25.68 | 2.14 | 1 |
| GT-AS-83 | -12.92 | 12.07 | 12.45 | 22.52 | 14.00 | 11.22 | -29.21 | 1.80 | 2 |
| GT-AS-79 | -13.76 | 11.81 | 14.09 | 20.16 | 15.94 | 10.56 | -29.70 | 1.47 | 3 |
| GT-AS-81 | -14.44 | 11.89 | 14.53 | 20.50 | 13.87 | 13.70 | -28.50 | 1.40 | 4 |
| GT-AS-62 | -10.79 | 8.99 | 11.66 | 18.55 | 12.66 | 9.39 | -27.38 | 1.36 | 5 |
| HJY-F1-73 | -10.52 | 8.72 | 11.75 | 16.15 | 12.57 | 9.08 | -24.86 | 1.26 | 6 |
| E-38-7 | -11.50 | 9.76 | 11.38 | 16.07 | 12.00 | 11.05 | -23.81 | 1.16 | 7 |
| GT-AS-57 | -13.87 | 11.36 | 14.16 | 17.08 | 13.55 | 12.23 | -26.38 | 1.08 | 8 |
| GT-GY-05 | -14.31 | 12.40 | 13.13 | 18.39 | 14.25 | 11.73 | -28.10 | 1.08 | 9 |
| GT-AS-72 | -14.26 | 10.11 | 15.18 | 19.76 | 14.70 | 11.36 | -28.40 | 1.05 | 10 |
| HJY-F1-107 | -15.81 | 13.12 | 11.99 | 18.08 | 13.75 | 19.37 | -31.87 | 0.75 | 11 |
| HJY-F1-102 | -18.03 | 11.32 | 19.85 | 19.67 | 17.72 | 13.97 | -30.22 | 0.73 | 12 |
| GT-AS-82 | -16.17 | 10.77 | 16.72 | 18.16 | 16.02 | 11.11 | -26.39 | 0.65 | 13 |
| HJY-F1-76 | -14.40 | 10.43 | 13.88 | 16.98 | 14.74 | 10.56 | -26.67 | 0.64 | 14 |
| GT-AS-19 | -19.52 | 13.98 | 17.73 | 20.40 | 17.07 | 14.80 | -29.52 | 0.52 | 15 |
| HJY-F1-55 | -16.55 | 11.19 | 15.43 | 19.06 | 14.85 | 12.53 | -26.89 | 0.49 | 16 |
| GZL | -17.93 | 14.43 | 14.58 | 18.95 | 14.28 | 13.93 | -27.61 | 0.48 | 17 |
| GT-AS-77 | -15.62 | 10.49 | 15.50 | 16.40 | 14.58 | 11.46 | -27.80 | 0.31 | 18 |
| GT-DZ-06 | -17.12 | 10.70 | 16.24 | 18.47 | 14.19 | 16.10 | -29.54 | 0.26 | 19 |
| HJY-F1-23 | -16.00 | 10.72 | 15.55 | 15.73 | 14.46 | 14.96 | -30.52 | 0.23 | 20 |
| HJY-F1-8 | -16.92 | 11.71 | 15.58 | 16.02 | 14.79 | 15.78 | -30.43 | 0.19 | 21 |
| NW2 | -18.75 | 14.12 | 14.96 | 18.80 | 15.06 | 15.89 | -31.81 | 0.13 | 22 |
| GT-AS-58 | -16.11 | 11.39 | 13.60 | 15.79 | 14.22 | 14.52 | -29.03 | 0.11 | 23 |
| HJY-F1-64 | -16.59 | 10.57 | 15.78 | 16.08 | 14.31 | 15.82 | -30.78 | 0.07 | 24 |
| ZN21 | -19.73 | 15.04 | 15.17 | 18.44 | 16.25 | 15.24 | -30.66 | 0.03 | 25 |
| QC1 | -20.53 | 15.52 | 17.22 | 17.26 | 15.75 | 19.72 | -34.20 | 0.02 | 26 |
| GT-CR-29 | -22.10 | 17.08 | 10.62 | 18.33 | 25.71 | 21.72 | -36.04 | -0.05 | 27 |
| KM-F1-03 | -20.52 | 12.74 | 19.62 | 19.36 | 17.21 | 14.87 | -33.25 | -0.15 | 28 |
| MT0801 | -22.26 | 17.37 | 14.45 | 20.25 | 17.62 | 13.74 | -28.13 | -0.24 | 29 |
| GT-AS-55 | -20.90 | 13.70 | 17.33 | 17.87 | 16.05 | 15.69 | -31.18 | -0.49 | 30 |
| NW1 | -25.02 | 16.50 | 21.42 | 20.79 | 18.04 | 20.46 | -36.43 | -0.50 | 31 |
| YGS0840 | -25.60 | 16.01 | 21.60 | 21.89 | 18.81 | 20.70 | -37.63 | -0.65 | 32 |
| GT-LP-22 | -22.88 | 14.74 | 18.18 | 19.40 | 17.27 | 17.79 | -33.90 | -0.67 | 33 |
| GT-LP-55 | -30.71 | 20.61 | 22.42 | 24.97 | 21.24 | 24.83 | -46.14 | -1.23 | 34 |
| ZK | -28.35 | 16.50 | 23.02 | 18.49 | 17.78 | 26.48 | -39.44 | -1.60 | 35 |
| 生化成分 Biochemical component | 不同类群的含量/(mg·g-1) Content in different clusters /(mg·g-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 类群Ⅰ Cluster Ⅰ | 类群Ⅱ Cluster Ⅱ | 类群Ⅲ Cluster Ⅲ | 类群Ⅳ Cluster Ⅳ | |
| TB | 12.70±3.07 a | 10.66±2.91 ab | 9.07±2.82 b | 8.34±1.62 b |
| TP | 0.18±0.08 a | 0.19±0.06 a | 0.11±0.06 b | 0.11±0.03 b |
| CAF | 39.44±6.23 a | 39.79±3.07 a | 30.93±2.70 b | 32.32±3.67 b |
| GA | 0.64±0.07 a | 0.51±0.16 ab | 0.45±0.14 b | 0.53±0.15 ab |
| EGC | 13.19±3.92 a | 16.87±2.79 a | 16.55±3.82 a | 12.92±2.63 a |
| C | 0.65±0.12 a | 0.58±0.11 a | 0.43±0.06 b | 0.47±0.08 b |
| EC | 6.37±1.99 a | 7.12±0.89 a | 6.65±2.46 a | 6.93±1.64 a |
| EGCG | 65.82±8.95 a | 75.99±15.38 a | 53.62±4.89 b | 49.37±7.46 b |
| GCG | 7.19±0.35 a | 7.59±1.17 a | 8.92±6.96 a | 7.18±1.14 a |
| ECG | 28.54±8.58 a | 24.80±5.56 a | 15.09±4.38 b | 17.15±5.16 b |
| TC | 121.76±11.71 a | 132.95±19.31 a | 101.26±11.18 b | 94.02±11.41 b |
| THE | 23.44±3.01 b | 24.92±6.30 b | 27.84±2.67 ab | 32.29±6.27 a |
| ASP | 2.21±0.36 ab | 1.82±0.67 b | 2.24±0.51 ab | 2.97±0.87 a |
| SER | 1.41±0.07 a | 0.79±0.18 c | 1.05±0.13 b | 1.39±0.17 a |
| GLU | 4.36±0.92 b | 3.41±0.77 b | 5.02±0.71 ab | 6.48±1.77 a |
| GLY | 0.06±0.03 b | 0.07±0.04 ab | 0.11±0.06 a | 0.08±0.03 ab |
| HIS | 3.73±2.49 b | 2.75±1.28 b | 3.93±1.32 b | 6.63±2.88 a |
| ARG | 4.82±3.93 b | 1.81±1.32 c | 6.33±1.64 ab | 7.67±2.49 a |
| THR | 0.26±0.09 a | 0.04±0.03 b | 0.09±0.05 b | 0.23±0.09 a |
| ALA | 0.21±0.03 b | 0.10±0.06 b | 0.17±0.08 b | 0.40±0.15 a |
| PRO | 1.57±0.27 ab | 1.61±0.43 a | 0.94±0.25 c | 1.11±0.48 bc |
| CYS | — | — | 0.01±0.01 a | 0.01±0.01 a |
| TYR | 0.14±0.12 a | 0.02±0.02 b | 0.05±0.03 b | 0.07±0.03 b |
| VAL | 2.03±0.32 b | 3.21±2.39 ab | 3.69±0.84 a | 3.57±0.93 a |
| MET | 0.33±0.21 a | 0.24±0.07 ab | 0.10±0.07 c | 0.14±0.07 bc |
| LYS | 0.15±0.03 a | 0.01±0.01 c | 0.07±0.06 bc | 0.09±0.06 ab |
| LEU | 0.20±0.11 a | 0.08±0.05 c | 0.13±0.03 bc | 0.16±0.05 ab |
| PHE | 0.26±0.06 a | 0.17±0.04 b | 0.24±0.08 ab | 0.26±0.05 a |
Table 5 Content of biochemical components in different clusters
| 生化成分 Biochemical component | 不同类群的含量/(mg·g-1) Content in different clusters /(mg·g-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 类群Ⅰ Cluster Ⅰ | 类群Ⅱ Cluster Ⅱ | 类群Ⅲ Cluster Ⅲ | 类群Ⅳ Cluster Ⅳ | |
| TB | 12.70±3.07 a | 10.66±2.91 ab | 9.07±2.82 b | 8.34±1.62 b |
| TP | 0.18±0.08 a | 0.19±0.06 a | 0.11±0.06 b | 0.11±0.03 b |
| CAF | 39.44±6.23 a | 39.79±3.07 a | 30.93±2.70 b | 32.32±3.67 b |
| GA | 0.64±0.07 a | 0.51±0.16 ab | 0.45±0.14 b | 0.53±0.15 ab |
| EGC | 13.19±3.92 a | 16.87±2.79 a | 16.55±3.82 a | 12.92±2.63 a |
| C | 0.65±0.12 a | 0.58±0.11 a | 0.43±0.06 b | 0.47±0.08 b |
| EC | 6.37±1.99 a | 7.12±0.89 a | 6.65±2.46 a | 6.93±1.64 a |
| EGCG | 65.82±8.95 a | 75.99±15.38 a | 53.62±4.89 b | 49.37±7.46 b |
| GCG | 7.19±0.35 a | 7.59±1.17 a | 8.92±6.96 a | 7.18±1.14 a |
| ECG | 28.54±8.58 a | 24.80±5.56 a | 15.09±4.38 b | 17.15±5.16 b |
| TC | 121.76±11.71 a | 132.95±19.31 a | 101.26±11.18 b | 94.02±11.41 b |
| THE | 23.44±3.01 b | 24.92±6.30 b | 27.84±2.67 ab | 32.29±6.27 a |
| ASP | 2.21±0.36 ab | 1.82±0.67 b | 2.24±0.51 ab | 2.97±0.87 a |
| SER | 1.41±0.07 a | 0.79±0.18 c | 1.05±0.13 b | 1.39±0.17 a |
| GLU | 4.36±0.92 b | 3.41±0.77 b | 5.02±0.71 ab | 6.48±1.77 a |
| GLY | 0.06±0.03 b | 0.07±0.04 ab | 0.11±0.06 a | 0.08±0.03 ab |
| HIS | 3.73±2.49 b | 2.75±1.28 b | 3.93±1.32 b | 6.63±2.88 a |
| ARG | 4.82±3.93 b | 1.81±1.32 c | 6.33±1.64 ab | 7.67±2.49 a |
| THR | 0.26±0.09 a | 0.04±0.03 b | 0.09±0.05 b | 0.23±0.09 a |
| ALA | 0.21±0.03 b | 0.10±0.06 b | 0.17±0.08 b | 0.40±0.15 a |
| PRO | 1.57±0.27 ab | 1.61±0.43 a | 0.94±0.25 c | 1.11±0.48 bc |
| CYS | — | — | 0.01±0.01 a | 0.01±0.01 a |
| TYR | 0.14±0.12 a | 0.02±0.02 b | 0.05±0.03 b | 0.07±0.03 b |
| VAL | 2.03±0.32 b | 3.21±2.39 ab | 3.69±0.84 a | 3.57±0.93 a |
| MET | 0.33±0.21 a | 0.24±0.07 ab | 0.10±0.07 c | 0.14±0.07 bc |
| LYS | 0.15±0.03 a | 0.01±0.01 c | 0.07±0.06 bc | 0.09±0.06 ab |
| LEU | 0.20±0.11 a | 0.08±0.05 c | 0.13±0.03 bc | 0.16±0.05 ab |
| PHE | 0.26±0.06 a | 0.17±0.04 b | 0.24±0.08 ab | 0.26±0.05 a |
| [1] | 唐璐, 李长乐, 葛悦, 等. 茶树地方群体种资源叶片表型及生化组分多样性分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(4): 473-488. |
| Tang L, Li C L, Ge Y, et al. Diversity analysis of leaf phenotype and biochemical components in tea local population resources[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2023, 43(4): 473-488. | |
| [2] | 朱艳宇, 于文涛, 高水练, 等. 福建安溪茶树种质资源遗传多样性与铁观音衍生品种遗传关系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1591-1601. |
| Zhu Y Y, Yu W T, Gao S L, et al. The diversity of tea germplasm resources and genetic relationship of ‘Tieguanyin’-derived varieties in Anxi, Fujian, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1591-1601. | |
| [3] | 郑美慧, 田玉凤, 桂荣娟, 等. 茶叶中生物碱检测方法的研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2019, 10(21): 7194-7199. |
| Zheng M H, Tian Y F, Gui R J, et al. Research progress on detection methods of alkaloids in tea[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2019, 10(21): 7194-7199. | |
| [4] | 刘昕, 吴建铭. 高效液相色谱法同时检测茶叶提取物中9种儿茶素类和3种生物碱类化合物[J]. 香料香精化妆品, 2024(1): 114-118. |
| Liu X, Wu J M. Simultaneous determination of nine catechins and three alkaloids in tea extracts by HPLC[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2024(1): 114-118. | |
| [5] | 刘培琴, 胡超琼, 邹燕, 等. HPLC-MS/MS法测定茶叶中儿茶素类、茶黄素类物质[J]. 中国测试, 2024, 50(7): 63-69. |
| Liu P Q, Hu C Q, Zou Y, et al. Determination of catechins and theaflavins in tea by HPLC-MS/MS[J]. China Measurement & Test, 2024, 50(7): 63-69. | |
| [6] | 王河川. 闽南地区19株野生茶树主要活性成分研究[J]. 中国茶叶, 2024, 46(10): 37-42. |
| Wang H C. Study on the main active ingredients of 19 wild tea trees in southern Fujian[J]. China Tea, 2024, 46(10): 37-42. | |
| [7] | 罗英, 罗弘禹. 72份武汉茶叶氨基酸检测与高茶氨酸品种筛选[J]. 江西化工, 2024, 40(4): 33-36. |
| Luo Y, Luo H Y. Amino acid detection of 72 Wuhan teas and screening of high theanine varieties[J]. Jiangxi Chemical Industry, 2024, 40(4): 33-36. | |
| [8] | 张致玮, 李梁, 杨小俊, 等. 茶叶中游离氨基酸的检测与其生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2024, 15(10): 82-89. |
| Zhang Z W, Li L, Yang X J, et al. Research progress on detection and biological activity of free amino acids in tea[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2024, 15(10): 82-89. | |
| [9] | 黄芳, 钱佳佳, 傅秀敏. 茶叶氨基酸合成代谢及转化研究进展[J]. 中国茶叶, 2023, 45(9): 10-18. |
| Huang F, Qian J J, Fu X M. Research advances in amino acid metabolism and transformation of tea plants(Camellia sinensis)[J]. China Tea, 2023, 45(9): 10-18. | |
| [10] | Wang C, Han J X, Pu Y T, et al. Tea (Camellia sinensis): a review of nutritional composition, potential applications, and omics research[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(12): 5874. |
| [11] | 董方, 李小飞, 沈思言, 等. 江西茶树资源的遗传多样性分析及优异种质筛选[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2022, 44(6): 1466-1477. |
| Dong F, Li X F, Shen S Y, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and screening of excellent germplasm of tea plant resources in Jiangxi[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2022, 44(6): 1466-1477. | |
| [12] | 喻云春, 林开勤, 魏杰, 等. 贵州茶树育种研究史略:上篇[J]. 贵茶, 2023(3): 61-72. |
| Yu Y C, Lin K Q, Wei J, et al. History of tea breeding in Guizhou: part 1[J]. Journal of Guizhou Tea, 2023(3): 61-72. | |
| [13] | 曹雨, 乔大河, 赵华富, 等. 25份贵州镇宁野生茶树种质资源的表型及生化组分多样性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(14): 81-88. |
| Cao Y, Qiao D H, Zhao H F, et al. Diversity analysis of 25 wild tea germplasms in Zhenning, Guizhou: phenotype and biochemical components[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(14): 81-88. | |
| [14] | 谢文钢, 李晓松, 谭礼强, 等. 四川茶树资源遗传多样性及高EGCG资源筛选[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(12): 2430-2438. |
| Xie W G, Li X S, Tan L Q, et al. Genetic diversity of tea resources and screening high EGCG germplasms in Sichuan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(12): 2430-2438. | |
| [15] | 陈潇敏, 赵峰, 王淑燕, 等. 福建野生茶树资源嘌呤生物碱构成评价及特异资源筛选[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(1): 18-28. |
| Chen X M, Zhao F, Wang S Y, et al. Purine alkaloid evaluation and excellent resources screening of Fujian wild tea[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2022, 42(1): 18-28. | |
| [16] | 靖翠翠, 杨秀芳, 谭蓉, 等. 微波制样对茶叶内质成分的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2015, 6(4): 1265-1270. |
| Jing C C, Yang X F, Tan R, et al. Effect of microwave fixation on tea chemical components[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2015, 6(4): 1265-1270. | |
| [17] | 杨春, 梁思慧, 陈正武, 等. 黄色芽叶茶树新品种黄金芽自然杂交后代的生化品质分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(9): 1859-1868. |
| Yang C, Liang S H, Chen Z W, et al. Biochemical quality analysis and evaluation of natural hybrid progenies from new tea variety with yellow bud leaf ‘Huangjinya’[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 36(9): 1859-1868. | |
| [18] | 乌凤章, 张润梅, 尹泽宇, 等. 基于主成分分析的高丛蓝莓品种果实品质综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(22): 262-269. |
| Wu F Z, Zhang R M, Yin Z Y, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of highbush blueberry cultivars based on principal component analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(22): 262-269. | |
| [19] | Jiang H, Zhang M T, Wang D X, et al. Analytical strategy coupled to chemometrics to differentiate Camellia sinensis tea types based on phenolic composition, alkaloids, and amino acids[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2020, 85(10): 3253-3263. |
| [20] | 郑红发, 黄亚辉, 黄怀生, 等. 高EGCG茶资源筛选及适制地域研究[J]. 福建茶叶, 2007, 29(2): 16-18. |
| Zheng H F, Huang Y H, Huang H S, et al. Selection for resource and suitable region of high EGCG tea[J]. Tea in Fujian, 2007, 29(2): 16-18. | |
| [21] | 杨春, 杨代星, 李燕, 等. 贵州大树茶形态学特征及生化成分综合分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(19): 3894-3919. |
| Yang C, Yang D X, Li Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of morphologic characters and biochemical components of Guizhou Dashu tea germplasms[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(19): 3894-3919. | |
| [22] | 莫岚, 黄亚辉, 赵文芳, 等. 金秀野生茶树群体中儿茶素和氨基酸组分含量分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 33(4): 690-695. |
| Mo L, Huang Y H, Zhao W F, et al. Contents of catechin and amino acid of wild tea colonies in Jinxiu[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Natural Science), 2018, 33(4): 690-695. | |
| [23] | 陈潇敏, 章进汕, 金珊, 等. 福建大田茶树品种资源生化成分特征分析与评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(2): 381-390. |
| Chen X M, Zhang J S, Jin S, et al. Analysis of biochemical components of tea variety resources in Datian, Fujian[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2022, 53(2): 381-390. | |
| [24] | 王治会, 彭华, 岳翠男, 等. 江西茶树资源功能成分综合评价与种质优选[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(8): 54-62. |
| Wang Z H, Peng H, Yue C N, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and germplasm selection of functional tea resources in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(8): 54-62. | |
| [25] | 刘梦月, 孙悦, 韦朝领, 等. 茶树功能性成分的遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 28-38. |
| Liu M Y, Sun Y, Wei C L, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation on functional components of tea tree (Camellia sinensis)[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 28-38. | |
| [26] | 梁思慧, 郭维, 杨春, 等. 贵州姑箐古茶树种质资源的生化成分特征分析与评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2025, 53(4): 94-103. |
| Liang S H, Guo W, Yang C, et al. Analysis and evaluation of biochemical component characteristics of Guqing ancient tea tree germplasm resources in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 53(4): 94-103. | |
| [27] | 马林龙, 金孝芳, 曹丹, 等. 湖北引种高氨基酸茶树品种的绿茶适制性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(2): 251-260. |
| Ma L L, Jin X F, Cao D, et al. Suitability for processing green tea from high amino acid content of tea introduced to Hubei Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(2): 251-260. | |
| [28] | 赵洋, 刘振, 杨培迪, 等. 黄金茶种质资源生化成分的多样性分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2021, 37(5): 1285-1291. |
| Zhao Y, Liu Z, Yang P D, et al. Diversity analysis of biochemical components in Huangjincha (Camellia sinensis) germplasm resources[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 37(5): 1285-1291. | |
| [29] | 江新凤, 李琛, 石旭平, 等. 高效液相色谱法对“黄金菊” 茶中儿茶素和氨基酸组分含量的测定[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(5): 172-176. |
| Jiang X F, Li C, Shi X P, et al. HPLC determination of catechin and amino acid components in Camellia sinensis ‘Huangjinju’[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(5): 172-176. | |
| [30] | 杨春, 乔大河, 郭燕, 等. 115份贵州茶树资源氨基酸和茶氨酸分析与特异资源筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1351-1360. |
| Yang C, Qiao D H, Guo Y, et al. Analysis into amino acids and theanine contents of 115 tea germplasms and special germplasm resource screening in Guizhou, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(7): 1351-1360. |
| [1] | MU Haoxin, CHEN Xiaoqi, FANG Pingping, LI Chaosen, WEI Jing, WANG Xueyan, ZHANG Ting, YANG Lifei, ZHAO Dongfeng. Evaluation of the morphological diversity of Luffa seeds and comparison of the contents of ribosome-inactivating proteins [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1563-1573. |
| [2] | QIN Douwen, TIAN Jiting, JU Xiuting. Phenotypic diversity of flower color of Tulipa iliensis in Xinjiang of China and its correlation with geographical factors [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(8): 1589-1597. |
| [3] | LAN Huijie, GAO Hongwei, JI Jiaruo, CAI Ruiguo, ZHANG Min, LIN Xiaohu, YANG Min. Comprehensive evaluation of 45 adzuki bean germplasms [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1177-1186. |
| [4] | DENG Yundan, LU Chengrui, LI Lushan, XU Yongyan. Determination and evaluation of nutrient contents in bulbs of 10 lily varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(6): 1228-1235. |
| [5] | LI Jiaqi, HU Kuanlian, SHEN Zijing, SHI Jianguo, HE Yun. Changes in the quality of frost mulberry leaf under different frost stress periods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(5): 934-943. |
| [6] | MA Huifang, WANG Juanfei, XUE Hongli, REN Guoxiang, SHI Guanyan. Genetic analysis of yield and phenotypic traits in new foxtail millet hybrid lines [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(3): 428-439. |
| [7] | LIU Jing, WANG Jian, HUANG Yu, WU Xiaohua, GUO Xuanhe, WANG Ying, LI Guojing, XU Xiaojiang. Indicator screening and model development for evaluating pumpkin fruit quality [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 248-257. |
| [8] | ZHONG Hongrui, CHU Yunxia, DENG Shan, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Yongchun, REN Li, ZHAO Hong, ZHANG Yiying, LIU Kun, CAO Jianguo, CHEN Hairong. Genetic diversity analysis of Hippeastrum breed resources based on distinctness, uniformity, and stability testing [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(2): 258-268. |
| [9] | HE Suyue, LI Yan, DING Yunqian, LI Xinze, HAN Qinghui, CHEN Xiaoyang. Phylogenetic analysis of maize landraces in Zhejiang Province of China based on SSR markers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2026, 38(1): 24-34. |
| [10] | XU Weimeng, XU Yan, CHEN Guoli. Comprehensive evaluation of waxy corn quality based on various analytical methods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848. |
| [11] | LIU Guomin, ZHENG Xu, LIAO Yujiao, QIN Yexin, QIN Weizhi. Effect of grafting on cold resistance of potato seedlings under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1615-1623. |
| [12] | TAN Yali, GAO Mengxiang, LI Xiaojie, ZHOU Yingjie, XIONG Jian, ZENG Ziqi, LI Xiao, YANG Hua. Quality of mainly cultivated walnuts in Hubei Province of China at different harvest periods [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1459-1468. |
| [13] | JIANG Zhenlan, CHEN Fuxun, LUO Shuangfei, LUO Yeqin, SHA Jinming. Inversion of soil total iron content using random forest model based on multi-spectral transformation and principle compoment analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1521-1532. |
| [14] | HONG Xia, LU Jilai, QI Huijuan, CHEN Xiaoshang. Genetic diversity analysis and core collection construction of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) germplasm accessions [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1233-1243. |
| [15] | YUE Li, ZHUANG Hongmei, ZULIPIYA· Maimaiti, WANG Jiamin, MAO Hongyan, ZHANG Yingxian, NIGARY· Yadikar, YU Ming. Comprehensive evaluation of the texture quality of turnip succulent root based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||