Effect of natamycin treatment on grape quality in e-commerce logistics process

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.17

Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 916-922.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.05.17

• Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of natamycin treatment on grape quality in e-commerce logistics process

WU Jian(), WANG Jiangong, CHU Weixiong^*()

Jiaxing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiaxing 314016, China

Received:2020-06-29 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-05-25
Contact: CHU Weixiong

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the effect of concentration and treatment method of namycin on the quality of grape in the process of logistics and transportation, the Shine-Muscat grape was selected as the material. Two groups of 0.5 and 1.0 g·L^-1 natamycin were used to treat grapes by two ways of soaking and spraying respectively.The results showed that compared with the control group, different concentrations of natamycin treatment had a certain freshness preservation effect. Among them, in the 1.0 g·L^-1 spray treatment, the threshing rate of grapes was only 4.69%, the decay rate was less than 2%, and the content of soluble solids decreased by 0.69 percentage points, total acid content decreased by 20.0%, respiratory intensity was 39.46 mg CO₂·kg^-1·h^-1, fruit hardness was 5.04 kg·cm^-2, which effectively reduced the nutrient loss of grapes, maintained the appearance and flavor of grapes, and made grapes still maintain a high commodity value after logistics transportion. Therefore, it is completely feasible to use natamycin for the preservation of grape e-commerce logistics.

Key words: grapes, e-commerce, natamycin, preservation quality

CLC Number:

S663.1

WU Jian, WANG Jiangong, CHU Weixiong. Effect of natamycin treatment on grape quality in e-commerce logistics process[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(5): 916-922.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1 Effect of different treatments on grape fruit color CK, Control; T1, 0.5 g·L-1 soaking treatment; T2, 1.0 g·L-1 soaking treatment; T3, 0.5 g·L-1 spraying treatment; T4, 1.0 g·L-1 spraying treatment. The same as below.

Fig.2 Effect of different treatments on weight loss rate of grape fruit

Fig.3 Effects of different treatments on the threshing rate and rot rate of grape

Fig.4 Effects of different treatments on the nutrient content of grape fruit

Fig.5 Effect of different treatments on grape fruit firmness

Fig.6 Effects of different treatments on the respiratory intensity of grape fruit

Table 1 Effect of different treatments on the fresh quality of grape fruit in the process of transportation

处理 Treatment	模拟运输时间Simulated transportation time/d
处理 Treatment	0	2	4	6
CK	4.0	4.5	4.0	3.0
T1	4.0	4.0	4.5	3.8
T2	4.0	3.5	4.0	3.5
T3	4.0	4.2	4.0	3.5
T4	4.0	4.0	4.4	4.0

References 19

[1]	李时珍. 本草纲目[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1975.
[2]	国际葡萄与葡萄酒组织发布《世界葡萄品种分布报告》[J]. 中国食品学报, 2018,18(3):72.
	The world grape variety distribution report was released by International Grape and Wine Organization[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2018,18(3):72.(in Chinese)
[3]	张演义, 宋长年, 房经贵, 等. 鲜食葡萄品种资源果实性状分析及育种目标的制定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2012,24(4):567-573.
	ZHANG Y Y, SONG C N, FANG J G, et al. Statistical analysis of some important fruit characters on table grape variety resources and setting of breeding goal[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2012,24(4):567-573.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	徐垚, 张哲, 董丽玮, 等. 贮藏过程中葡萄保鲜方法研究进展[J]. 冷藏技术, 2017,40(4):56-59.
	XU Y, ZHANG Z, DONG L W, et al. Research progress of preservation of grapes in store[J]. Journal of Refrigeration Technology, 2017,40(4):56-59.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	张凯. 食品中纳他霉素使用注意事项的讨论[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2020(12):55.
	ZHANG K. Discussion on matters needing attention in the use of natamycin in food[J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2020(12):55.(in Chinese)
[6]	常虹, 吴毓炜, 唐明, 等. 贡柑的复合涂膜保鲜效果研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020,48(6):163-169.
	CHANG H, WU Y W, TANG M, et al. Preservation effects of compound coating on the tribute Citrus[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020,48(6):163-169.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	曹森, 吉宁, 巴良杰, 等. 采前喷施不同保鲜剂对采后蓝莓贮藏品质的影响[J/OL]. 食品与机械:1-7.(2020-03-10)[2020-07-06]. https://kns.cnki.netkcmsdetail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST&filename=SPJX20200309001&v=p28InTYh5POytjHjWflOnOAouyMxtKP7%25mmd2BFjARIwuX3%25mmd2FH6vFVBSkuT%25mmd2FGgew84UEVp.
	CAO S, JI N, BA L J, et al. Effects of preharvest different preservation spraying on postharvest storage quality of blueberry[J/OL]. Food & Mechinary, (2020-03-10)[2020-07-06]. https://kns.cnki.netkcmsdetail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST&filename=SPJX20200309001&v=p28InTYh5POytjHjWflOnOAouyMxtKP7%25mmd2BFjARIwuX3%25mmd2FH6vFVBSkuT%25mmd2FGgew84UEVp.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	梁美, 耿阳阳, 王纪辉, 等. 新型鲜核桃贮藏保鲜剂的研究进展[J]. 四川农业科技, 2020(1):52-54.
	LIANG M, GENG Y Y, WANG J H, et al. Research progress of new fresh walnut preservatives[J]. Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(1):52-54. (in Chinese)
[9]	倪世杰. 不同冷藏保鲜处理对甜樱桃贮藏防腐效果研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018.
	NI S J. Effects of different cold storage and preservation on storage decay control of sweet cherry[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	李鑫, 张鹏, 李江阔, 等. 1-甲基环丙烯、纳他霉素处理对富士苹果贮后货架品质和风味的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2016,42(9):241-250.
	LI X, ZHANG P, LI J K, et al. Effects of 1-MCP and natamycin on quality and flavor change in different Brix Fuji apple during ambient storage[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2016,42(9):241-250.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 中华人民共和国推荐性国家标准: 葡萄酒、果酒通用分析方法 GB/T 15038—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[12]	韩雅姗. 食品化学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1992.
[13]	HOLCROFT D M, KADER A A. Controlled atmosphere-induced changes in pH and organic acid metabolism may affect color of stored strawberry fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1999,17(1):19-32. DOI URL
[14]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 中华人民共和国推荐性国家标准: 食品中总酸的测定 GB/T 12456—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[15]	张桂. 果蔬采后呼吸强度的测定方法[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2005,41(8):596-597.
	ZHANG G. Method of determination of respiration strength for vegetables and fruits after reaping[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part B (Chemical Analysis), 2005,41(8):596-597.(in Chinese)
[16]	姜爱丽, 胡文忠, 田密霞, 等. 纳他霉素在草莓保鲜中应用的研究[J]. 食品科学, 2007,28(12):515-520.
	JIANG A L, HU W Z, TIAN M X, et al. Study on utilization of natamycin in storage of strawberry fruit[J]. Food Science, 2007,28(12):515-520.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	彭永彬, 李玉, 徐鹏程, 等. 葡萄果实硬度及影响硬度的主要因素[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014,26(5):1227-1234.
	PENG Y B, LI Y, XU P C, et al. Grape fruit firmness and the main influencing factors[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2014,26(5):1227-1234.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 中华人民共和国国家标准: 食品安全国家标准食品添加剂使用标准 GB 2760—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
[19]	王建国. 纳他霉素对冬枣的保鲜效应及低温贮藏残留动态[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2007.
	WANG J G. Effect of natamycin on preservation of winter jujube and residue dynamics during low temperature storage[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2007.(in Chinese with English abstract)

Effect of natamycin treatment on grape quality in e-commerce logistics process

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 19

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CUI Pengfei, WEI Lingzhu, CHENG Jianhui, XIANG Jiang, LI Mingshan, WU Jiang2, . Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 52-61.
[2]	YANG Mingxia, LIAN Hongjuan, WANG Xiaofang, DU Yiyang, DONG Zhigang, JI Wei. Identification and expression analysis of grape MPT gene family [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(12): 2173-2185.
[3]	GE Jintao, WANG Jiangying, ZHAO Wenjing, SHAO Xiaobin, ZHU Pengbo, TANG Xueyan, SUN Mingwei, LIU Xingman. Transcriptome analysis on development of aerial root in grape of Weike [J]. , 2020, 32(9): 1645-1655.
[4]	SHANG Jiayin, LI Kai, WANG Chaoxia, JI Xian, SUN Jianjun, WANG Dan, SU Hong, TIAN Shufen. Effects of leaf-to-fruit ratio on pruning efficiency and leaf physiological characteristics of Kyoho grape [J]. , 2019, 31(11): 1855-1862.
[5]	ZHANG Anshi, PANG Jincheng, LIU Ying, GAO Dengtao, WEI Zhifeng. Genetic diversity analysis and fingerprinting construction of Muscat Hamburg grapevine series by iPBS marker [J]. , 2019, 31(10): 1624-1631.
[6]	CAO Yuehua, WEI Lingzhu, SHEN Biwei, CHENG Jianhui, XIANG Jiang, WU Jiang. Effects of rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Xinyu grape [J]. , 2019, 31(6): 908-914.
[7]	CHEN Hongqiang, XIA Hui, WANG Jin, DENG Qunxian, LIANG Dong, LYU Xiulan, TANG Liping. Identification and expression analysis of STS gene family in grape [J]. , 2019, 31(3): 401-407.
[8]	ZHENG Ting, ZHANG Kekun, ZHU Xudong, GUAN Le, SHANGGUAN Lingfei, JIA Haifeng, FANG Jinggui. Rules of sap flow in grapevine during bleeding period [J]. , 2019, 31(2): 250-259.
[9]	CHEN Tianyu, GAO Xiaoyang, WU Xiang, WU Jiling, YAN Renzhe, LI Hongling. Dynamic simulation model for branch growth of Red Globe grape [J]. , 2017, 29(7): 1208-1215.
[10]	ZHANG Hao, ZHANG Yiwen, LING Shuping, ZHANG Liang, CHEN Ruoxia, WU Yinliang, ZHU Yong. Effects and risk assessment of imazalil treatment on grape storage [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 840-844.