Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1243-1252.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.02
• Crop Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xintong(
), WAN Zuliang, YANG Zhenzhong, WANG Guojiao*(
)
Received:2022-08-01
Online:2023-06-25
Published:2023-07-04
CLC Number:
WANG Xintong, WAN Zuliang, YANG Zhenzhong, WANG Guojiao. Effects of rice straw returning to fields by wet harrow in autumn on leaf-soil ecological stoichiometry of rice at different growth stages[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2023, 35(6): 1243-1252.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2023.06.02
| 处理 Treatment | 有机碳 Organic carbon/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/ (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus/ (g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium/ (g·kg-1) | 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 15.81±0.74 | 1.60±0.04 | 0.65±0.02 | 22.37±0.38 | 14.84±0.61 | 3.14±0.12 | 40.23±1.56 | 283.04±5.16 |
| S1 | 15.92±0.14 | 1.60±0.05 | 0.71±0.02 | 22.88±0.43 | 16.40±0.87 | 3.34±0.15 | 39.86±2.06 | 320.26±5.75 |
| S2 | 17.05±0.14 | 1.69±0.04 | 0.73±0.03 | 22.94±0.34 | 16.20±0.69 | 3.41±0.21 | 40.93±2.15 | 326.82±2.52 |
Table 1 Basic physiochemical properties of test soils
| 处理 Treatment | 有机碳 Organic carbon/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/ (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus/ (g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium/ (g·kg-1) | 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 15.81±0.74 | 1.60±0.04 | 0.65±0.02 | 22.37±0.38 | 14.84±0.61 | 3.14±0.12 | 40.23±1.56 | 283.04±5.16 |
| S1 | 15.92±0.14 | 1.60±0.05 | 0.71±0.02 | 22.88±0.43 | 16.40±0.87 | 3.34±0.15 | 39.86±2.06 | 320.26±5.75 |
| S2 | 17.05±0.14 | 1.69±0.04 | 0.73±0.03 | 22.94±0.34 | 16.20±0.69 | 3.41±0.21 | 40.93±2.15 | 326.82±2.52 |
Fig.1 Effects of different treatments on contents of organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in soil Bars marked without the same uppercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) differences within treatments at the same growth stage, while bars marked without the same lowercase letters indicate significant (P<0.05) differences within different stages under the same treatment. The same as below.
| 生育时期Growth stage | 处理Treatment | C/(g·kg-1) | N/(g·kg-1) | P/(g·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分蘖期Tillering | CK | 507.24±25.99 Aa | 46.73±1.78 Aa | 4.27±0.40 Aa |
| S1 | 503.00±25.77 Aa | 48.71±1.02 Aa | 4.24±0.29 Aa | |
| S2 | 509.68±16.16 Aa | 47.25±1.56 Aa | 4.23±0.16 Aa | |
| 拔节期Jointing | CK | 524.31±24.70 Aa | 37.08±1.53 Ab | 3.81±0.09 Ab |
| S1 | 520.38±26.96 Aa | 39.48±1.85 Ab | 3.79±0.20 Ab | |
| S2 | 534.95±25.65 Aa | 39.67±1.02 Ab | 4.04±0.19 Ab | |
| 抽穗期Heading | CK | 524.89±17.60 Aa | 28.45±1.76 Ac | 2.80±0.12 Ac |
| S1 | 530.01±25.19 Aa | 27.94±1.25 Ac | 2.65±0.08 Ac | |
| S2 | 508.13±20.24 Aa | 28.25±1.67 Ac | 2.86±0.12 Ac | |
| 成熟期Maturity | CK | 529.07±20.92 Aa | 18.79±1.4 Ad | 2.02±0.10 Ad |
| S1 | 526.97±21.53 Aa | 16.80±0.85 Bd | 1.95±0.15 Ad | |
| S2 | 504.75±23.48 Aa | 17.93±0.41 ABd | 1.96±0.22 Ad |
Table 2 Effect of different treatments on C, N, P contents of leaves
| 生育时期Growth stage | 处理Treatment | C/(g·kg-1) | N/(g·kg-1) | P/(g·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分蘖期Tillering | CK | 507.24±25.99 Aa | 46.73±1.78 Aa | 4.27±0.40 Aa |
| S1 | 503.00±25.77 Aa | 48.71±1.02 Aa | 4.24±0.29 Aa | |
| S2 | 509.68±16.16 Aa | 47.25±1.56 Aa | 4.23±0.16 Aa | |
| 拔节期Jointing | CK | 524.31±24.70 Aa | 37.08±1.53 Ab | 3.81±0.09 Ab |
| S1 | 520.38±26.96 Aa | 39.48±1.85 Ab | 3.79±0.20 Ab | |
| S2 | 534.95±25.65 Aa | 39.67±1.02 Ab | 4.04±0.19 Ab | |
| 抽穗期Heading | CK | 524.89±17.60 Aa | 28.45±1.76 Ac | 2.80±0.12 Ac |
| S1 | 530.01±25.19 Aa | 27.94±1.25 Ac | 2.65±0.08 Ac | |
| S2 | 508.13±20.24 Aa | 28.25±1.67 Ac | 2.86±0.12 Ac | |
| 成熟期Maturity | CK | 529.07±20.92 Aa | 18.79±1.4 Ad | 2.02±0.10 Ad |
| S1 | 526.97±21.53 Aa | 16.80±0.85 Bd | 1.95±0.15 Ad | |
| S2 | 504.75±23.48 Aa | 17.93±0.41 ABd | 1.96±0.22 Ad |
| 生育时期Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 碳氮比C/N ratio | 碳磷比C/P ratio | 氮磷比N/P ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分蘖期Tillering | CK | 10.85±0.14 Ad | 119.07±5.05 Ad | 10.98±0.61 Aa |
| S1 | 10.32±0.31 Bd | 118.59±1.91 Ad | 11.50±0.54 Aa | |
| S2 | 10.79±0.02 Ad | 120.38±0.76 Ad | 11.16±0.06 Aa | |
| 拔节期Jointing | CK | 14.14±0.08 Ac | 137.59±3.22 Ac | 9.73±0.17 Bbc |
| S1 | 13.18±0.07 Bc | 137.20±0.29 Ac | 10.41±0.07 Ab | |
| S2 | 13.48±0.30 Bc | 132.46±0.03 Bc | 9.83±0.22 Bb | |
| 抽穗期Heading | CK | 18.47±0.53 ABb | 187.66±1.79 Bb | 10.16±0.19 ABb |
| S1 | 18.97±0.05 Ab | 199.60±3.74 Ab | 10.52±0.17 Ab | |
| S2 | 18.00±0.35 Bb | 177.87±0.22 Cb | 9.88±0.18 Bb | |
| 成熟期Maturity | CK | 28.20±0.75 Ba | 262.09±2.65 Aa | 9.30±0.15 Ac |
| S1 | 31.22±0.29 Aa | 271.13±9.53 Aa | 8.68±0.22 Ac | |
| S2 | 28.14±0.67 Ba | 258.93±17.27 Aa | 9.21±0.84 Ac |
Table 3 Effect of different treatments on ecological stoichiometry of rice leaves
| 生育时期Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 碳氮比C/N ratio | 碳磷比C/P ratio | 氮磷比N/P ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分蘖期Tillering | CK | 10.85±0.14 Ad | 119.07±5.05 Ad | 10.98±0.61 Aa |
| S1 | 10.32±0.31 Bd | 118.59±1.91 Ad | 11.50±0.54 Aa | |
| S2 | 10.79±0.02 Ad | 120.38±0.76 Ad | 11.16±0.06 Aa | |
| 拔节期Jointing | CK | 14.14±0.08 Ac | 137.59±3.22 Ac | 9.73±0.17 Bbc |
| S1 | 13.18±0.07 Bc | 137.20±0.29 Ac | 10.41±0.07 Ab | |
| S2 | 13.48±0.30 Bc | 132.46±0.03 Bc | 9.83±0.22 Bb | |
| 抽穗期Heading | CK | 18.47±0.53 ABb | 187.66±1.79 Bb | 10.16±0.19 ABb |
| S1 | 18.97±0.05 Ab | 199.60±3.74 Ab | 10.52±0.17 Ab | |
| S2 | 18.00±0.35 Bb | 177.87±0.22 Cb | 9.88±0.18 Bb | |
| 成熟期Maturity | CK | 28.20±0.75 Ba | 262.09±2.65 Aa | 9.30±0.15 Ac |
| S1 | 31.22±0.29 Aa | 271.13±9.53 Aa | 8.68±0.22 Ac | |
| S2 | 28.14±0.67 Ba | 258.93±17.27 Aa | 9.21±0.84 Ac |
| 处理 Treatment | 穗数 Ear number/ (104 hm-2) | 穗粒数 Number of spikes | 千粒重 Thousand seeds weight/g | 结实率 Seeding rate/% | 理论产量 Theoretical yield/(t·hm-2) | 实测产量 Actual yield/ (t·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 498.14±22.49 A | 123.30±4.48 A | 24.08±0.81 B | 85.05±0.62 B | 12.47±0.15 B | 11.82±0.16 B |
| S1 | 500.89±25.24 A | 113.16±1.93 B | 24.97±0.15 A | 88.11±0.53 A | 12.31±0.16 B | 11.58±0.18 B |
| S2 | 526.68±20.12 A | 117.72±4.61 AB | 23.90±0.47 B | 87.52±1.72 A | 13.20±0.14 A | 12.52±0.20 A |
Table 4 Effects of different treatments on on grain yield and its components
| 处理 Treatment | 穗数 Ear number/ (104 hm-2) | 穗粒数 Number of spikes | 千粒重 Thousand seeds weight/g | 结实率 Seeding rate/% | 理论产量 Theoretical yield/(t·hm-2) | 实测产量 Actual yield/ (t·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 498.14±22.49 A | 123.30±4.48 A | 24.08±0.81 B | 85.05±0.62 B | 12.47±0.15 B | 11.82±0.16 B |
| S1 | 500.89±25.24 A | 113.16±1.93 B | 24.97±0.15 A | 88.11±0.53 A | 12.31±0.16 B | 11.58±0.18 B |
| S2 | 526.68±20.12 A | 117.72±4.61 AB | 23.90±0.47 B | 87.52±1.72 A | 13.20±0.14 A | 12.52±0.20 A |
Fig.3 Correlation within soil-leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents, stoichiometric characteristics and rice yield C, Soil organic carbon; N, Soil total nitrogen; P, Soil total phosphorus; C∶N, C/N ratio of soil; C∶P, C/P ratio of soil; N∶P, N/P ratio of soil; LC, C content of rice leaves; LN, N content of rice leaves; LP, P content of rice leaves; LC∶N, C/N ratio of rice leaves; LC∶P, C/P ratio of rice leaves; LN∶P, N/P ratio of rice leaves; T, Theoretical yield; A, Actual yield. “*” “**” represent significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.
| [1] | CHAI R S, HUANG J, LUO L C, et al. Distribution of rice straw phosphorus resources in China and its utilization potential under straw return[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(6): 1095-1104. |
| [2] | 李亚鑫, 张娟霞, 刘伟刚, 等. 玉米秸秆还田配施氮肥对冬小麦产量和土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(7): 38-44. |
| LI Y X, ZHANG J X, LIU W G, et al. Effects of maize straw return with nitrogen fertilizer on winter wheat yield and nitrate nitrogen[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(7): 38-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 王忍, 黄璜, 伍佳, 等. 稻草还田对土壤养分及水稻生物量和产量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2020, 34(1): 8-15. |
| WANG R, HUANG H, WU J, et al. Effects of rice straw returning on soil nutrients, rice biomass and yield[J]. Crop Research, 2020, 34(1): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 成臣, 汪建军, 程慧煌, 等. 秸秆还田与耕作方式对双季稻产量及土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(1): 247-257. |
| CHENG C, WANG J J, CHENG H H, et al. Effects of straw returning and tillage system on crop yield and soil fertility quality in paddy field under double-cropping-rice system[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(1): 247-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 栾天浩, 刘云强, 高阳, 等. 不同秸秆还田方式对玉米产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(6): 64-67. |
| LUAN T H, LIU Y Q, GAO Y, et al. Effects of different straw returning methods on maize yield and soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 45(6): 64-67. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 唐海明, 肖小平, 汤文光, 等. 冬季覆盖作物秸秆还田对水稻植株养分积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(8): 63-73. |
| TANG H M, XIAO X P, TANG W G, et al. Effects of covering paddy field by crop straw in winter on nutrition accumulation and translocation of rice plant[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 63-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. |
| WANG S Q, YU G R. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | DU C J, GAO Y H. Grazing exclusion alters ecological stoichiometry of plant and soil in degraded alpine grassland[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 308: 107256. |
| [9] | 田地, 严正兵, 方精云. 植物生态化学计量特征及其主要假说[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(7): 682-713. |
| TIAN D, YAN Z B, FANG J Y. Review on characteristics and main hypotheses of plant ecological stoichiometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(7): 682-713. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 林少颖, 赖清志, 刘旭阳, 等. 秸秆及配施生物炭对福州茉莉园土壤碳、氮、磷、铁含量及其生态化学计量学特征影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(9): 3777-3791. |
| LIN S Y, LAI Q Z, LIU X Y, et al. Effects of straw and biochar on soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and iron contents and ecological stoichiometric characteristics of jasmine garden in Fuzhou[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021, 41(9): 3777-3791. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 彭亚敏, 武均, 蔡立群, 等. 免耕及秸秆覆盖对春小麦-土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(4): 1062-1072. |
| PENG Y M, WU J, CAI L Q, et al. Effects of no-tillage and straw mulching on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in spring wheat and soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(4): 1062-1072. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 盘礼东, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 等. 西南喀斯特区坡耕地秸秆覆盖对土壤生态化学计量特征及产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(11): 4428-4438. |
| PAN L D, LI R, ZHANG Y S, et al. Effects of straw mulching on soil ecological stoichiometry characteristics and yield on sloping farmland in Karst area, Southwestern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(11): 4428-4438. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 孟祥宇, 冉成, 刘宝龙, 等. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对东北黑土稻区土壤养分及水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(3): 167-172. |
| MENG X Y, RAN C, LIU B L, et al. Effects of straw returning to field and nitrogen application on soil nutrients and rice yield in black soil areas of northeast China[J]. Crops, 2021(3): 167-172. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 卞景阳, 刘琳帅, 孙兴荣, 等. 施氮对寒地粳稻还田秸秆腐解及养分释放的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2019, 31(5): 22-28. |
| BIAN J Y, LIU L S, SUN X R, et al. Effect of nitrogen application on straw decomposition and nutrient release of japonica rice in cold region[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2019, 31(5): 22-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | SARDANS J, ALONSO R, JANSSENS I A, et al. Foliar and soil concentrations and stoichiometry of nitrogen and phosphorous across European Pinus sylvestris forests: relationships with climate, N deposition and tree growth[J]. Functional Ecology, 2016, 30(5): 676-689. |
| [16] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. |
| [17] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
| [18] | 张聪, 慕平, 尚建明. 长期持续秸秆还田对土壤理化特性、酶活性和产量性状的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1): 92-98. |
| ZHANG C, MU P, SHANG J M. Effects of continuous returning corn straw on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities and yield trait[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(1): 92-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 金强, 安婉丽, 刘旭阳, 等. 模拟酸雨对福州沿江稻田水稻叶片碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(9): 3085-3095. |
| JIN Q, AN W L, LIU X Y, et al. Effects of simulated acid rain on carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus contents and the ecological stoichiometry of rice leaves in Fuzhou rice fields along the river[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 3085-3095. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 刘迪, 邓强, 时新荣, 等. 黄土高原刺槐人工林根际和非根际土壤磷酸酶活性对模拟降水变化的响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 95-103. |
| LIU D, DENG Q, SHI X R, et al. Responses of phosphatase activity in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils to simulated precipitation changes in planted Robinia pseudoacacia forest on the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 95-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | TESSIER J T, RAYNAL D J. Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 40(3): 523-534. |
| [22] | 陈小雪, 李红丽, 董智, 等. 滨海盐碱地土壤化学计量特征与群落物种多样性及其相关关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 37-45. |
| CHEN X X, LI H L, DONG Z, et al. Characteristics of soil stoichiometry and species diversity of community and their coupling relationship in coastal saline-alkali land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(6): 37-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 唐美玲, 肖谋良, 袁红朝, 等. CO2倍增条件下不同生育期水稻碳氮磷含量及其计量比特征[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(12): 5708-5716. |
| TANG M L, XIAO M L, YUAN H Z, et al. Effect of CO2 doubling and different plant growth stages on rice carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus and their stoichiometric ratios[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(12): 5708-5716. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 武红艳, 王岩, 赵天宏, 等. 臭氧浓度升高条件下秸秆还田对大豆叶片生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(2): 355-364. |
| WU H Y, WANG Y, ZHAO T H, et al. Effects of straw returning on the ecological stoichiometry of soybean leaves under elevated ozone concentration[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 50(2): 355-364. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [25] | 李婷, 邓强, 袁志友, 等. 黄土高原纬度梯度上的植物与土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量学特征[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(8): 2988-2996. |
| LI T, DENG Q, YUAN Z Y, et al. Latitudinal changes in plant stoichiometric and soil C, N, P stoichiometry in Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(8): 2988-2996. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | 冯斌, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 等. 不同放牧方式对高寒草地功能群生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1063-1070. |
| FENG B, YANG X X, LIU W T, et al. Effects of different livestock assembly on the stoichiometry of alpine grassland functional groups[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1063-1070. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 陈云, 李玉强, 王旭洋, 等. 中国典型生态脆弱区生态化学计量学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 4213-4225. |
| CHEN Y, LI Y Q, WANG X Y, et al. Advances in ecological stoichiometry in typically and ecologically vulnerable regions of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 4213-4225. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | KOERSELMAN W, MEULEMAN A F M. The vegetation N∶P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33(6): 1441. |
| [29] | 盖霞普, 刘宏斌, 杨波, 等. 不同施肥年限下作物产量及土壤碳氮库容对增施有机物料的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(4): 676-689. |
| GAI X P, LIU H B, YANG B, et al. Responses of crop yields, soil carbon and nitrogen stocks to additional application of organic materials in different fertilization years[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 676-689. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 吴科生, 车宗贤, 包兴国, 等. 河西绿洲灌区灌漠土长期秸秆还田土壤肥力和作物产量特征分析[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(12): 59-70. |
| WU K S, CHE Z X, BAO X G, et al. Analysis of soil fertility and crop yield characteristics following long-term straw return to the field in a Hexi Oasis irrigated area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(12): 59-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | WU Ju, YANG Fei, WU Guoquan, FU Xian, XU Chenguang. Effects of sand culture and soil culture on growth, yield, and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1905-1913. |
| [2] | ZHU Weijing, WU Jia, HONG Chunlai, ZHU Fengxiang, HONG Leidong, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Shuo, ZHU Huifen. Effects of straw mulching on water, heat, fertility status of soil and yield and quality of flat peach [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932. |
| [3] | WEI Qingcui, JIANG Naying, SHEN Junyang, ZHANG Huanchao, ZHANG Hengfeng. Effects of reduced chemical fertilization and biochar application on nitrogen and phosphorus leaching and soil properties of sandy soil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 1943-1950. |
| [4] | PEI Huimin, WU Mingming, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Jing, JIN Yue, ZHU Yi, HOU Jianjun, ZHU Guofu, YE Shenghai. Research progress on gene function and breeding of low-cadmium rice cultivars [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(9): 2012-2020. |
| [5] | TAN Haixia, PENG Hongli, WANG Lianlong, WEI Jianmei. Differences in soil microbial community diversity between healthy and scab-diseased potato plants in root zone [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1743-1754. |
| [6] | GAO Yang, ZHANG Yuxin, BU Aiai, XU Jiayi, MA Jiawei, YE Zhengqian, LIU Dan, FANG Xianzhi. Evaluation of fertility quality in typical “non-grain” cultivated soils of Zhejiang Province of China based on the improved Nemerow method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1755-1765. |
| [7] | YAN Fulin, LANG Yunhu, JIAN Yingquan, CHEN Xiongfei, WEI Wei, WANG Zhiwei, AN Jiangyong, REN Deqiang, DING Ning, WEI Shenghua. Response of yield and quality of Radix Ardisia to soil physiochemical properties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775. |
| [8] | JIANG Zhenlan, CHEN Fuxun, LUO Shuangfei, LUO Yeqin, SHA Jinming. Inversion of soil total iron content using random forest model based on multi-spectral transformation and principle compoment analysis [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1521-1532. |
| [9] | TAN Shiyi, YU Guohong, XUE Xianglei, ZHAO Yinglei, XU Baoyu, ZHANG Chenghao. Design and experiment of tray handling device for industrialized rice seedling raising [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1545-1555. |
| [10] | ZHANG Zhi, HE Haohao, YU Miao, XU Jianfeng. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with soil conditioner on soil acidity, soil nutrients and rice yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308. |
| [11] | LIN Xiaobing, LI Jiang, CHENG Yanhong, WANG Binqiang, HE Shaolang, HUANG Shangshu, HUANG Qianru. Effects of organic materials on soil microbial biomass, mineral nitrogen content and rice yield [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318. |
| [12] | HE Xinyun, DENG Bichun, HU Qingyu, FENG Hong, GUO Yanbiao. Application of nitrogen fertilizer for banana based on nitrate nitrogen concentration in soil solution [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1319-1326. |
| [13] | REN Ning, YU Guohong, ZHENG Hang, CHEN Zhidong. Parameter calibration of tea garden soil based on discrete element method [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1353-1359. |
| [14] | ZHUO Wenqi, MA Wanzhu, ZHUO Zhiqing, ZHU Kangying. Comparison of properties between soils developed from eluvium and deluvium in subtropical low mountain forest land [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1121-1129. |
| [15] | SU Yang, SHANG Xiaolan, QIAN Zhongming, WU Lingen, HUANG Jiaqi, ZHUANG Haifeng, ZHAO Yufei, DANG Hongyang, XU Lijun. Effects of synergistic enhancement of straw returning to the field with decomposition agent and biochar on soil quality and rice growth [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(5): 1139-1148. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||