Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 1957-1968.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240340
• Crop Seience • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Haofeng1(), LIN Zhaoyang1,2, SHEN Zhicheng1,*(
)
Received:
2024-04-12
Online:
2024-09-25
Published:
2024-09-30
CLC Number:
WU Haofeng, LIN Zhaoyang, SHEN Zhicheng. A transgenic rice resistant to glyphosate and flazasulfuron[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 1957-1968.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnyxb.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240340
除草剂浓度 Herbicide concentration | 41%草甘膦异丙胺盐水剂用量 41% Glyphosate isopropylamine aqueous solution dosage | 25%啶嘧磺隆水分散粒剂用量 25% Flazasulfuron water dispersible granules dosage |
---|---|---|
0(清水Water control) | 0 | 0 |
1倍浓度Single concentration | 5 mL·L-1(900 g·hm-2) | 0.1 g·L-1(15 g·hm-2) |
2倍浓度Double concentration | 10 mL·L-1(1 800 g·hm-2) | 0.2 g·L-1(30 g·hm-2) |
4倍浓度Quadruple concentration | 20 mL·L-1(3 600 g·hm-2) | 0.4 g·L-1(60 g·hm-2) |
Table 1 List of compound herbicide ingredients
除草剂浓度 Herbicide concentration | 41%草甘膦异丙胺盐水剂用量 41% Glyphosate isopropylamine aqueous solution dosage | 25%啶嘧磺隆水分散粒剂用量 25% Flazasulfuron water dispersible granules dosage |
---|---|---|
0(清水Water control) | 0 | 0 |
1倍浓度Single concentration | 5 mL·L-1(900 g·hm-2) | 0.1 g·L-1(15 g·hm-2) |
2倍浓度Double concentration | 10 mL·L-1(1 800 g·hm-2) | 0.2 g·L-1(30 g·hm-2) |
4倍浓度Quadruple concentration | 20 mL·L-1(3 600 g·hm-2) | 0.4 g·L-1(60 g·hm-2) |
引物 Primer | 引物序列 Primer sequences(5'→3') |
---|---|
CP4-F | ATGGCGGCGACCATGGCGTCCAACG |
CP4-R | TCAAGCGGCCTTCGTGTCAGACAGTTC |
N-Z1-F | ATGGATAAGGCCTACGTGGCCCTCC |
N-Z1-R | TCAGAGCTCCTGCAAAACCTCACGC |
Table 2 PCR primer sequences for the foreign genes
引物 Primer | 引物序列 Primer sequences(5'→3') |
---|---|
CP4-F | ATGGCGGCGACCATGGCGTCCAACG |
CP4-R | TCAAGCGGCCTTCGTGTCAGACAGTTC |
N-Z1-F | ATGGATAAGGCCTACGTGGCCCTCC |
N-Z1-R | TCAGAGCTCCTGCAAAACCTCACGC |
引物Primer | 引物序列Primer sequences(5'→3') |
---|---|
LB-SPI | TTTCTCCATAATAATGTGTGAGTAGTTCCC |
LB-SP2a | ACGATGGACTCCAGTCCGGCCCTCATGTGTTGAGCATATAAGAAACCCTTAG |
LB-SPIII | CTAAAACCAAAATCCAGTACTAAAATCC |
RB-0b | CGTGACTGGGAAAACCCTGGCGTT |
RB-1b | ACGATGGACTCCAGTCCGGCCCAACTTAATCGCCTTGCAGCACATC |
RB-2b | GAAGAGGCCCGCACCGATCGCCCTT |
LAD1 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCVNVNNNGGAA |
LAD2 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCBNBNNNGGTT |
LAD3 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCVVNVNNNCCAA |
LAD4 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCBDNBNNNCGGT |
AC1 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAG |
Table 3 Primers sequences for high-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR
引物Primer | 引物序列Primer sequences(5'→3') |
---|---|
LB-SPI | TTTCTCCATAATAATGTGTGAGTAGTTCCC |
LB-SP2a | ACGATGGACTCCAGTCCGGCCCTCATGTGTTGAGCATATAAGAAACCCTTAG |
LB-SPIII | CTAAAACCAAAATCCAGTACTAAAATCC |
RB-0b | CGTGACTGGGAAAACCCTGGCGTT |
RB-1b | ACGATGGACTCCAGTCCGGCCCAACTTAATCGCCTTGCAGCACATC |
RB-2b | GAAGAGGCCCGCACCGATCGCCCTT |
LAD1 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCVNVNNNGGAA |
LAD2 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCBNBNNNGGTT |
LAD3 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCVVNVNNNCCAA |
LAD4 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAGCGGCCGCBDNBNNNCGGT |
AC1 | ACGATGGACTCCAGAG |
引物 Primer | 引物序列 Primer sequences(5'→3') |
---|---|
L1 | CTCCCCCATTCTGGCTTGGAA |
L2 | CATTGTGAAGCCCTCGAGTAATTGG |
L3 | ACCGGAGACATATAGTGCTGGTTT |
R1 | TGGGCGCTCTTCGACGGATT |
R2 | GGCCATCGCAGCCATTAAATCG |
R3 | TCCTCTGTGGGGCTTTGGAC |
Table 4 Boundary validation primer sequence
引物 Primer | 引物序列 Primer sequences(5'→3') |
---|---|
L1 | CTCCCCCATTCTGGCTTGGAA |
L2 | CATTGTGAAGCCCTCGAGTAATTGG |
L3 | ACCGGAGACATATAGTGCTGGTTT |
R1 | TGGGCGCTCTTCGACGGATT |
R2 | GGCCATCGCAGCCATTAAATCG |
R3 | TCCTCTGTGGGGCTTTGGAC |
Fig.2 Glyphosate tolerance test results of transgenic rice events in greenhouse Water, Water control; Glyphosate, Spary glyphosate at a rate of 900 g·hm-2 (based on acid equivalent); TG, GF series transgenic rice events; NT, Non-transgenic control.
Fig.3 Flazasulfuron tolerance test results of transgenic rice events in greenhouse Water, Water control; Flazasulfuron, Spary flazasulfuron at a rate of 15 g·hm-2 (based on active ingredient); TG, GF series transgenic rice events; NT, Non-transgenic control.
Fig.4 Images of weed control effects in paddy fields using compound herbicides A, Occurrence of weeds in rice fields 7 days after application of a mixed herbicide;B, Occurrence of weeds in rice fields 28 days after application of a mixed herbicide; TG, GF series transgenic rice events; NT, Non-transgenic control; Single, Single concentration compound herbicide treatment; Double, Double concentration compound herbicide treatment; Quadruple, Quadruple concentration compound herbicide treatment.
Fig.5 The damage situation of GF-9 after 28 days of treatment with different concentrations of herbicide TG, GF series transgenic rice events; NT, Non-transgenic control; Single, Single concentration compound herbicide treatment; Double, Double concentration compound herbicide treatment; Quadruple, Quadruple concentration compound herbicide treatment.
除草剂浓度 Herbicide concentration | GF-9 | 秀水134 XS-134 |
---|---|---|
0(清水Water control) | 83.57±2.44 Aa | 86.16±3.67 A |
1倍浓度Single concentration | 82.03±2.38 a | — |
2倍浓度Double concentration | 78.50±2.36 b | 00.00±0.00 |
4倍浓度 | 78.20±2.57 b | — |
Quadruple concentration |
Table 5 Plant height for GF-9 under different herbicide concentrations
除草剂浓度 Herbicide concentration | GF-9 | 秀水134 XS-134 |
---|---|---|
0(清水Water control) | 83.57±2.44 Aa | 86.16±3.67 A |
1倍浓度Single concentration | 82.03±2.38 a | — |
2倍浓度Double concentration | 78.50±2.36 b | 00.00±0.00 |
4倍浓度 | 78.20±2.57 b | — |
Quadruple concentration |
试验材料 Material | 除草剂浓度 Herbicide concentration | 穗长 Panicle length/cm | 分蘖数 Tiller number | 百粒重 Hundred-grain weight/g | 结实率 Setting rate% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GF-9 | 0(清水Water control) | 14.82±0.72 Aa | 9.00±1.18 Aa | 2.536±0.027 Aa | 68.29±4.60 Aa |
1倍浓度Single concentration | 15.84±0.81 a | 10.20±2.35 a | 2.575±0.025 a | 71.01±7.52 a | |
2倍浓度Double concentration | 15.72±1.05 a | 10.20±2.30 a | 2.519±0.048 a | 69.12±5.49 a | |
4倍浓度Quadruple concentration | 15.47±1.21 a | 8.58±2.50 a | 2.254±0.042 b | 55.20±2.60 b | |
秀水134 XS-134 | 0(清水Water control) | 14.32±1.57 A | 8.50±1.35 A | 2.543±0.051 A | 65.00±5.70 A |
Table 6 Agronomic performance of GF-9 under different concentrations of herbicide
试验材料 Material | 除草剂浓度 Herbicide concentration | 穗长 Panicle length/cm | 分蘖数 Tiller number | 百粒重 Hundred-grain weight/g | 结实率 Setting rate% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GF-9 | 0(清水Water control) | 14.82±0.72 Aa | 9.00±1.18 Aa | 2.536±0.027 Aa | 68.29±4.60 Aa |
1倍浓度Single concentration | 15.84±0.81 a | 10.20±2.35 a | 2.575±0.025 a | 71.01±7.52 a | |
2倍浓度Double concentration | 15.72±1.05 a | 10.20±2.30 a | 2.519±0.048 a | 69.12±5.49 a | |
4倍浓度Quadruple concentration | 15.47±1.21 a | 8.58±2.50 a | 2.254±0.042 b | 55.20±2.60 b | |
秀水134 XS-134 | 0(清水Water control) | 14.32±1.57 A | 8.50±1.35 A | 2.543±0.051 A | 65.00±5.70 A |
Fig.6 Panicle length and fruiting rate of GF-9 under different concentrations of herbicide NT, Non-transgenic control under water treatment; Single, Single concentration compound herbicide treatment; Double, Double concentration compound herbicide treatment; Quadruple, Quadruple concentration compound herbicide treatment.
Fig.7 PCR detection results of the transgenes in GF-9 A, PCR results of CP4-EPSPS gene; B, PCR results of P450-N-Z1 gene; M, DNA Marker; +, Positive plasmid; -, Non-transgenic control; 1, GF-9 T0 generation sample genome; 2-4, GF-9 T1 generation sample genome; 3-7, GF-9 T2 generation sample genome.
Fig.8 Boundary verification results of the event GF-9 A, PCR validation results of the left border of GF-9; B, PCR validation results of the right border of GF-9. M, DNA Marker; L1-L3, PCR results of the verification primers for three different distances outside the left border of T-DNA, respectively with LB-SPI; R1-R3, PCR results of the verification primers for three different distances outside the right border of T-DNA, respectively with RB-0b; -, Negative rice control.
Fig.9 Integration model of the foreign T-DNA in GF-9 and verification results of the boundary sequencing L1-L3, Primers for validating the left border of T-DNA.; R1-R3, Primers for validating the right border of T-DNA.
Fig.10 Schematic diagram of GF-9 restriction enzyme and CP4 probe location and expected hybridization signal band size Probe, Gene sequence used to make probe.
Fig.12 Western blot results of CP4-EPSPS protein M, Protein pageruler; +, CP4-EPSPS protein expressed in prokaryotes; -, Non-transgenic rice control group; 1-7, Seven independent plants of T1 generation transgenic line GF-9.
[1] | AKBAR N, EHSANULLAH, JABRAN K, et al. Weed management improves yield and quality of direct seeded rice[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2011, 5(6): 688-694. |
[2] |
DUKE S O, POWLES S B. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide[J]. Pest Management Science, 2008, 64(4): 319-325.
DOI PMID |
[3] | BENTLEY R. The shikimate pathway: a metabolic tree with many branches[J]. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1990, 25(5): 307-384. |
[4] |
DILL G M. Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status and future[J]. Pest Management Science, 2005, 61(3): 219-224.
DOI PMID |
[5] | 陈世国, 强胜, 毛婵娟. 草甘膦作用机制和抗性研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2): 17-24. |
CHEN S G, QIANG S, MAO C J. Mechanism of action of glyphosate and research advances in glyphosate resistance[J]. Plant Protection, 2017, 43(2): 17-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 沈国辉, 杨烈, 钱振官, 等. 秀百宫: 暖季型草坪广谱性除草剂[J]. 草原与草坪, 2001, 21(3): 49-51. |
SHEN G H, YANG L, QIAN Z G, et al. Shibagen: a broad spectrum herbicide for weed control in warm season turfgrass[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2001, 21(3): 49-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 范文政. 啶嘧磺隆: 葡萄、柑橘、橄榄、甘蔗和非耕地的新型除草剂[J]. 世界农药, 2004, 26(1): 48-49. |
FAN W Z. Flazasulfuron:the new herbicides for grapes, citrus, olives, sugarcane, and non-agricultural fields.[J]. World Pesticide, 2004, 26(1): 48-49. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | ZHENG T, YU X X, SUN Y Z, et al. Expression of a cytochrome P450 gene from Bermuda grass Cynodon dactylon in soybean confers tolerance to multiple herbicides[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(7): 949. |
[9] | HIEI Y, KOMARI T, KUBO T. Transformation of rice mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 1997, 35(1): 205-218. |
[10] | HEALEY A, FURTADO A, COOPER T, et al. Protocol: a simple method for extracting next-generation sequencing quality genomic DNA from recalcitrant plant species[J]. Plant Methods, 2014, 10(1): 21. |
[11] | LIU Y G, CHEN Y L. High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences[J]. BioTechniques, 2007, 43(5): 649-650, 652, 654. |
[12] |
胡江博, 任正鹏, 丁翔, 等. 稻田除草剂应用现状与抗除草剂水稻育种研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 13-19.
DOI |
HU J B, REN Z P, DING X, et al. Application of herbicides in rice fields and research progress on herbicide-resistant rice varieties breeding[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(4): 13-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
|
[13] | 刘庆虎, 陈国奇, 张玉华, 等. 不同叶龄千金子、稗和马唐对氰氟草酯和五氟磺草胺的敏感性[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(5): 771-776. |
LIU Q H, CHEN G Q, ZHANG Y H, et al. Sensitivities of Leptochloa chinensis, Echinochloa crusgalli and Digitaria sanguinalis at different leaf stages to cyhalofop-butyl and penoxsulam[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016, 39(5): 771-776. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | DAMALAS C A, KOUTROUBAS S D. Herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) in global rice production[J]. Weed Biology and Management, 2023, 23(1): 23-33. |
[15] |
KAWAHIGASHI H, HIROSE S, OHKAWA H, et al. Herbicide resistance of transgenic rice plants expressing human CYP1A1[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2007, 25(1): 75-84.
PMID |
[16] | HAN H P, YU Q, BEFFA R, et al. Cytochrome P450 CYP81A10v7 in Lolium rigidum confers metabolic resistance to herbicides a cross at least five modes of action[J]. The Plant Journal, 2021, 105(1): 79-92. |
[1] | CHEN Yutiao, YAN Chuan, HONG Xiaofu, SONG Jiayu. Effects of submergence at tillering stage on growth characters, yield formation and potassium uptake of japonica inbred rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 1990-1999. |
[2] | YAN Jingying, NI Liang, SHEN Xingyu, LI Yu. Effect of heat treatment on the degradation of recombinant protein and recombinant DNA in transgenic straws [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2079-2088. |
[3] | ZHAN Mengqi, SU Aoxue, HOU Qian, ZHANG Haoyu, JIANG Xinrui, XU Yan. Uptake and accumulation of lindane in rice and its metabolomics [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(9): 2110-2121. |
[4] | SHAO Yaxu, LIU Tao, WANG Shicheng, YAN Lei. Screening of proportions and molding conditions of seeding substrate with straw and organic fertilizer [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(8): 1856-1866. |
[5] | PAN Zhijun, WU Xiaowen, WU Chenyang, CHENG Yu, CHEN Long, ZHANG Xiaohong, ZHANG Jinshan, ZHOU Bing, JIANG Bo, ZHANG Wenjing, CHE Zhao, SONG He. Analysis of yield and utilization of temperature and light resources of different types of ratoon rice varieties in central Anhui, China [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1492-1501. |
[6] | TANG Jinyu, HUANG Fuyong, DAI Yangxin, LOU Bao, GUO Shuirong. The temporal characteristic of plankton community and their relationship with shrimp growth in the co-cultural farming of rice and redclaw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(7): 1537-1547. |
[7] | XIONG Rui, OUYANG Ning, OU Xi, ZHONG Kangyu, ZHOU Wentao, WANG Hongrui, LONG Pan, XU Ying, FU Zhiqiang. Effect of straw returning and tillage method on soil aggregates and carbon, nitrogen content in double-season rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(6): 1347-1356. |
[8] | ZHAO Liming, WANG Yaxin, JIANG Wenxin, DUAN Shaobiao, SHEN Xuefeng, ZHENG Dianfeng, FENG Naijie. Effects of plant growth regulators on yield, quality and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality japonica rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(5): 1003-1014. |
[9] | WANG Zhuoquan, LIN Zhenpeng, CHEN Xudong, QIAN Bin, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Shenghai, YE Jing, WU Mingming, ZHU Guofu, ZHANG Xiaoming. Effects of glutinous rice characteristics of different glutinous rice varieties on the quality of Shaoxing rice wine [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(4): 773-779. |
[10] | DONG Aiqin, CHEN Yuanhua, YANG Tao, XU Changxu, CHENG Liqun, XIE Jie. Effect of application of lime with Chinese milk vetch on the cadmium uptake in rice [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 600-612. |
[11] | YE Qin, MENG Xianghe, CHEN Lihong. Effects of rice bran curing on physicochemical quality and fat oxidation characteristics of sauce duck [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(3): 634-642. |
[12] | ZHANG Bin, YUAN Zhihui, PENG Lujun, ZHOU Xiangping, ZHOU Deying, WANG Xichun. Fermented rice husk affects the growth and development of tobacco seedlings by enhancing nitrogen metabolism pathway [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 237-246. |
[13] | ZHENG Han, DING Wenjin, HE Zhaoliang, HOU Fan, DAI Binfeng, ZHONG Liequan, ZHANG Haipeng, YANG Yong. Research progress on effects of high temperature on growth and development of rice during panicle initiation stage and mitigation measures [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(2): 470-480. |
[14] | YANG Xifan, GUO Bin, QIU Gaoyang, LIU Junli, TONG Wenbin, YANG Haijun, ZHU Weidong, MAO Congyan. Inhibiting effects of immobilization agents on cadmium, lead and arsenic in rice production [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 1-8. |
[15] | LUO Yingjie, CUI Weijun, WANG Zhonghua, WU Yueyan, LIN Hongyou, ZHOU Jie, YAN Chengqi, WANG Xuming. Interaction analysis between rice ubiquitin ligase D3 and the disease resistance associated protein VOZ2 [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(1): 9-17. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||