芒果蒂腐病拮抗放线菌A10和A17的分离、鉴定和特征化研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.03.11

浙江农业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 460-468.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.03.11

芒果蒂腐病拮抗放线菌A10和A17的分离、鉴定和特征化研究

郭雪松¹, 田丽波¹, 商桑^2,*, 邹凯茜¹, 陈虹容¹, 李婉豫¹, 岳晓琦¹

1.海南大学园艺学院/海南省热带园艺作物品质调控重点实验室,海南海口 570228;
2.海南大学生命科学与药学院,海南海口 570228

收稿日期:2019-11-23 出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-04-03
通讯作者: *商桑,E-mail: fair.play@163.com
作者简介:郭雪松(1996—),男,安徽淮北人,硕士研究生,主要从事园艺植物采后生防研究。E-mail:gxs943991580@163.com
基金资助:
海南省自然科学基金(317036); 园艺“3+2”专业分段培养试点学生创新课题(YY17-02); 海南大学大学生创新创业训练计划(201810589211); 2018年海南省研究生创新科研课题(Hys2018-34)

Isolation, identification and characterization of antagonistic actinomycetes A10 and A17 against Botryodiplodia theobromae

GUO Xuesong¹, TIAN Libo¹, SHANG Sang^2,*, ZOU Kaixi¹, CHEN Hongrong¹, LI Wanyu¹, YUE Xiaoqi¹

1.College of Horticulture, Hainan University/The Key Laboratory of Tropical Horticultural Crop Quality Regulation of Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China;
2.College of Life Science and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

Received:2019-11-23 Online:2020-03-25 Published:2020-04-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为丰富芒果蒂腐病拮抗菌资源,寻找替代化学杀菌剂的无毒无污染的采后防治方法,使用平板稀释法、划线纯化法、纸片扩散法从芒果树根际土壤中分离筛选对蒂腐病有拮抗作用的放线菌,明确其分类地位,优化其发酵条件,测试活体防效。共筛选到两株对采后芒果蒂腐病菌可可球二孢(Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat.)有较强抑菌活性的拮抗放线菌A10和A17,其中A17对另一种引起芒果蒂腐病的病原菌芒果拟茎点霉也有拮抗作用。经形态特征、生理生化特性和分子鉴定初步判断,2株放线菌均为链霉菌属(Streptomyces)。A10菌株的发酵培养基和发酵条件优化后为:2.5%乳糖,2.0%蛋白胨,初始pH 8.0,摇床转速200 r·min^-1,培养时间120 h;A17菌株的发酵培养基和发酵条件优化为:2.0%可溶性淀粉,2.0%蛋白胨,初始pH 7.0,摇床转速200 r·min^-1,培养时间120 h。活体实验中,第4天时,无菌水处理的对照组果实发病率和发病指数分别为81.7%、52.5,A10处理组分别为43.3%、21.7,A17处理组分别为36.7%、17.5,450 mg·kg^-1咪鲜胺处理组分别为16.7%、12.2,说明两株菌均对蒂腐病的发生和病斑扩展有一定的抑制效果,且A17对病斑扩展的抑制效果和450 mg·kg^-1咪鲜胺处理无显著差异。研究表明,这两种菌株均对蒂腐病菌有一定的拮抗作用,可进一步深入研究。

关键词: 芒果蒂腐病, 拮抗放线菌, 筛选, 鉴定, 防效

Abstract: In order to enrich the antagonistic and antibacterial resources of mango stem-end rot and find a non-toxic and non-polluting post-harvest control method instead of chemical fungicide, plate dilution method, scribing purification method and paper diffusion method were used to separate and screen the antagonistic actinomycetes against Botryodiplodia theobromae from mangrove rhizosphere soil. Their taxonomic status was identified, the fermentation conditions were optimized, and the biological control effect was tested. A total of two antagonistic actinomycetes A10 and A17 with strong antibacterial activity against postharvest mango rot fungus (Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat.) were screened. According to the morphological characteristics, physiological and biochemical characteristics and molecular identification, the two actinomycetes were all Streptomyces. The fermentation medium and fermentation conditions of A10 strain were optimized as follows: 2.5% lactose, 2.0% peptone, initial pH 8.0, shaking speed 200 r·min^-1, culture time 120 h. The fermentation medium and fermentation conditions of A17 strain were optimized as follows: 2.0% soluble starch, 2.0% peptone, initial pH 7.0, shaking speed 200 r·min^-1, culture time 120 h. In vivo experiment, on the 4th day, the incidence and disease index of the control group treated with sterile water were 81.7% and 52.5, respectively, 43.3% and 21.7 in the A10 group, 36.7% and 17.5 in the A17 group, and 16.7% and 12.2 in the 450 mg·kg^-1 prochloraz group. Both strains had a certain inhibition effect on the occurrence and expansion of the disease spot, and A17 had a certain inhibition effect on the expansion of the disease spot. There was no significant difference between the inhibitory effect of A17 and that of 450 mg·kg^-1 prochloraz. The results showed that the two strains had some antagonistic effect on the pathogen, which could be further studied.

Key words: mango stem-end rot, antagonistic actinomycetes, screening, identification, control effect

中图分类号:

S436.67

郭雪松, 田丽波, 商桑, 邹凯茜, 陈虹容, 李婉豫, 岳晓琦. 芒果蒂腐病拮抗放线菌A10和A17的分离、鉴定和特征化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 460-468.

GUO Xuesong, TIAN Libo, SHANG Sang, ZOU Kaixi, CHEN Hongrong, LI Wanyu, YUE Xiaoqi. Isolation, identification and characterization of antagonistic actinomycetes A10 and A17 against Botryodiplodia theobromae[J]. , 2020, 32(3): 460-468.

参考文献

[1] 贺瑞, 赵磊, 符瑞, 等. 海南芒果蒂腐病菌对吡唑醚菌酯的抗药性测定[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(4): 188-193.
HE R, ZHAO L, FU R, et al.Resistance of Botryodiplodia theobromae caused mango stem end rot to pyraclostrobin in Hainan[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(4): 188-193.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 胡美姣, 高兆银, 李敏, 等. 杧果果实潜伏侵染真菌种类研究[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(1): 105-110.
HU M J, GAO Z Y, LI M, et al.Investigation of latent infection of pathogenic fungi in mango fruits[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012, 29(1): 105-110.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] HONG S K, LEE S Y, CHOI H W, et al.Occurrence of stem-end rot on mango fruits caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae in Korea[J]. The Plant Pathology Journal, 2012, 28(4): 455.
[4] DROBY S, WISNIEWSKI M, MACARISIN D, et al.Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: is it time for a new paradigm?[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2009, 52(2): 137-145.
[5] SPADARO D, GULLINO M L.State of the art and future prospects of the biological control of postharvest fruit diseases[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2004, 91(2): 185-194.
[6] 王兰英, 王琴, 冉杜, 等. 三桠苦拮抗内生真菌SCK-Y₉筛选及其抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2014, 34(8): 10-13.
WANG L Y, WANG Q, RAN D, et al.Screening of antagonistic endophytic fungi SCK-Y9 in Evodia lepta and its fungicidal activities bioassay[J]. China Plant Protection, 2014, 34(8): 10-13.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 赵超, 胡美姣, 李敏, 等. 芒果采后病害拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定及其生防效果研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(2): 385-389.
ZHAO C, HU M J, LI M, et al.Antagonists selection and control effect on postharvest diseases of mango fruit[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(2): 385-389.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] LUGTENBERG B, KAMILOVA F.Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology, 2009, 63(1): 541-556.
[9] LI R, SHEN Z Z, SUN L, et al.Novel soil fumigation method for suppressing cucumber Fusarium wilt disease associated with soil microflora alterations[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 101: 28-36.
[10] 马喆. 根结线虫拮抗放线菌NZ-5菌株的鉴定及其发酵条件优化[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(13): 59-67.
MA Z.Identification of nematicidal actinomycete NZ-5 and optimization of ferment conditions[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019(13): 59-67.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 张凯, 吴曼莉, 辜柳霜, 等. 胶孢炭疽菌生防放线菌gz-8的鉴定及生物活性初步评价[J]. 农药学学报, 2017, 19(6): 708-715.
ZHANG K, WU M L, GU L S, et al.Identification and preliminary evaluation of a biocontrol actinomycete strain gz-8 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2017, 19(6): 708-715.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 曹利, 车程川, 刘金锋, 等. 拮抗黄曲霉海洋放线菌的筛选及发酵条件优化[J]. 中国酿造, 2019, 38(3): 104-109.
CAO L, CHE C C, LIU J F, et al.Screening and fermentation conditions optimization of marine actinomycetes of antagonistic Aspergillus flavus[J]. China Brewing, 2019, 38(3): 104-109.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 赵淑莉, 任飞娥, 刘金亮, 等. 玉米大斑病生防放线菌的筛选鉴定及发酵条件优化[J]. 微生物学报, 2012, 52(10): 1228-1236.
ZHAO S L, REN E R, LIU J L, et al.Screening, identification and optimization of fermentation conditions of an antagonistic actinomycetes strain to Setosphaeria Turcica[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2012, 52(10): 1228-1236.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 刘雪梅. 微生物分析仪法与常规纸片扩散法在细菌耐药表型检测中的调查分析[J].中国卫生产业,2017,14(17):51-52.
LIU X M.Investigation and analysis of microbial analyzer method and conventional disc diffusion method in detection of bacterial resistance phenotypes[J].China Health Industry,2017,14(17):51-52. (in Chinese)
[15] 刘建玲, 陈宝宝, 刘永红, 等. 半夏内生菌的分离与初步鉴定[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2009, 34(18): 2305-2307.
LIU J L, CHEN B B, LIU Y H, et al.Isolation and identification of endophytes from Pinellia[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2009, 34(18): 2305-2307.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] XU C N, ZHANG H J, ZHOU Z S, et al.Identification and distribution of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with blueberry stem blight in China[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2015, 143(4): 737-752.
[17] ZHOU Y, GONG G S, CUI Y L, et al.Identification of Botryosphaeriaceae species causing kiwifruit rot in Sichuan Province, China[J]. Plant Disease, 2015, 99(5): 699-708.
[18] 徐志周, 王明元, 杜锦鹏, 等. 一株香蕉枯萎病拮抗菌HQB-1的分离鉴定及其发酵条件优化[J]. 微生物学通报, 2019, 46(7): 1611-1618.
XU Z Z, WANG M Y, DU J P, et al.Isolation, identification and fermentation optimization of an antagonistic bacterial strain HQB-1 against banana wilt disease[J]. Microbiology China, 2019, 46(7): 1611-1618.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] SADEGHIAN M, SHAHIDI BONJAR G H, SHARIFI SIRCHI G R. Post harvest biological control of apple bitter rot by soil-borne actinomycetes and molecular identification of the active antagonist[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2016, 112: 46-54.
[20] 孙平平, 贾晓辉, 崔建潮, 等. 梨灰霉病拮抗放线菌L-30的筛选、鉴定及作用机制研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(12): 2335-2346.
SUN P P, JIA X H, CUI J C, et al.Selection, identification and characterization of Actinomyces L-30 for the biocontrol of pear gray mold[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43(12): 2335-2346.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] VELA GUROVIC M S, OLIVERA N L. Antibacterial producing actinomycetes from Extra-Andean Patagonia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2017, 144: 216-219.
[22] 武峥. 防治苹果采后病害拮抗酵母菌的分离、筛选及其抑菌效果的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2005.
WU Z.Study on screening yeasts in biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apples and the inhibition effects of the selected antagonists[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2005.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 马龙传. SA、MeJA及O₃增强拮抗酵母对水果采后病害的控制效应[D].镇江:江苏大学,2009.
MA L C.SA, MEJA and O₃ enhanced the biocontrol efficacy of antagonistic yeast to the postharvest disease of fruits[D].Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University,2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 石晶盈, 刘爱媛, 李雪萍, 等. 番木瓜果实内生细菌MGP3菌株的鉴定及拮抗作用[J]. 微生物学报, 2011, 51(9): 1240-1247.
SHI J Y, LIU A Y, LI X P, et al.Identification and antagonistic activities of an endophytic bacterium MGP3 isolated from Papaya fruit[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2011, 51(9): 1240-1247.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 李敏, 杨谦, 王疏, 等. 哈茨木霉与多菌灵复合使用对水稻苗期立枯病的防治[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2009, 35(1): 65-70.
LI M, YANG Q, WANG S, et al.Trichoderma harzianum in combination with carbendazim for integrated control of rice seedling blight[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2009, 35(1): 65-70.(in Chinese with English abstract)

芒果蒂腐病拮抗放线菌A10和A17的分离、鉴定和特征化研究

Isolation, identification and characterization of antagonistic actinomycetes A10 and A17 against Botryodiplodia theobromae

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨梅, 胡小兰, 申涛, 谭康, 刘代铃, 邱红波. 玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 383-389.
[2]	刘磊, 王讯, 罗毅, 梁继元, 颜培祺, 李昕怡, 刘薇, 刘辰恺, 李佳佳. 鸽小肠上皮细胞的分离培养与鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 239-247.
[3]	忻晓庭, 刘大群, 张程程, 吴敏, 陈登高, 章检明. 我国特色发酵蔬菜降解亚硝酸盐菌株的筛选鉴定及应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 335-345.
[4]	许双燕, 张涛, 张成, 林辉, 水贤磊, 郑华宝. 一株红霉素降解菌的筛选、鉴定与降解特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 131-141.
[5]	陈文强, 汪小福, 陈笑芸, 彭城, 徐俊锋, 蔡健. 基于ITS2和SNP技术鉴定浙江铁皮石斛的初步研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 69-76.
[6]	黄振东, 蒲占湑, 胡秀荣, 陈国庆, 吕佳, 占红木. 矿物油乳剂对柑橘木虱定殖行为的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 87-95.
[7]	徐雪芬, 倪春辉, 李惠霞, 李焕宇, 李文豪, 陈垣, 胡芳弟. 党参根腐病病原菌鉴定及其室内毒力测定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 96-103.
[8]	廖朝美, 游敏芳, 谭光辉, 李杰章, 张依裕, 覃媛钰, 刘若余. 三穗鸭PRKCB基因内含子14的变异对蛋壳品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1574-1580.
[9]	孙筱君, 沈琦, 吴逸飞, 姚晓红, 李园成, 孙宏, 王新, 汤江武, 葛向阳. 氨氮降解微生物的筛选和初步应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1683-1691.
[10]	张小彦, 何静, 侯彩霞, 张树衡. 枸杞根腐病菌拮抗菌株的筛选与鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 858-865.
[11]	俞洁雅, 倪梦萍, 丁良长, 胡洲铭, 肖建中, 郑强. 一株猪粪降解菌的筛选、评价及鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 586-592.
[12]	李戌清, 严建立, 阮松林. 三叶青炭疽病病原菌的鉴定与生物学特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(11): 2009-2019.
[13]	袁献宇, 杨龙斌, 何赞赞, 毛天骄, 何长生, 占松鹤, 孙裴, 魏建忠, 李郁. 安徽省猪伪狂犬病毒的分离鉴定及其主要毒力基因分子特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 43-56.
[14]	易可可, 阴文奇, 周远成, 蒋金蓁, 张白玉, 李中银, 颜其贵. 四株猪伪狂犬病毒株的分离鉴定与主要毒力基因分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(9): 1429-1436.
[15]	杨移斌, 艾晓辉, 宋怿, 董靖, 胥宁, 姜兰. 黄颡鱼溶血性腹水病初探[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(8): 1239-1248.