浙江农业学报

• 环境科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四种土壤重金属形态分析方法的对比研究

  

  1. (1 惠州学院 生命科学系,广东 惠州 516007;2 惠州市农产品质量安全监督检测中心,广东 惠州 516008)
  • 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-12-05

Comparison of four speciation analytical methods for soil heavy metals

  1. ( 1 Department of Life Science, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China; 2 Huizhou Agricultural Product Quality Safety Supervision and Inspection Center, Huizhou 516008, China )
  • Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-12-05

摘要: 为探寻一种适应性广、分析效果好的土壤重金属形态分析方法,选取当前重金属形态3种主流分析方法(Tessier法、修正BCR法、黄颜珠BCR法)和本文提出的优化五态法,以黄红壤为标品,对4种分析方法的分析效果进行对比研究。结果发现,黄颜珠BCR法测定土壤重金属全量时分析误差最小,其次是五态法。土壤重金属形态分析中,酸可提取态和可氧化态重金属的分析效果以修正BCR法较好,还原态重金属分析效果以Tessier法较好。五态法提取的重金属残渣态比例偏高,但较Tessier 法在分析酸可提取态重金属、可氧化态重金属和残渣态重金属方面具有明显优势。建议在今后的研究中,应根据不同研究目的和样本的实际情况选择相应的分析方法。

关键词: 重金属, 测定方法, 形态分析

Abstract: In order to explore an effective speciation analytical method for soil heavy metals with wide adaptability, a comparison of four determination methods was carried out on yellow red soil among Tessier method, modified BCR method, Huangyanzhu BCR method and the proposed five\|state method. It wa shown that Huang yan\|zhu BCR method exhibited the least analytical error on heavy metals total content, followed by five\|state method. For heavy metal form analysis, modified BCR method was more effective for the determination of acid extractable and oxidizable state heavy metal, while Tessier method was more effective in the determination of reduced state heavy metals. The proposed five\|state method would yield higher value for residual state heavy metal determination, but it exhibited better analytical effect on acid extractable heavy metals, oxidizable state heavy metal and residual state heavy metal than Tessier method. It is suggested that research aim and sample information should be well considered when selecting appropriate analytical method.

Key words: heavy metal, determination method, speciation analysis