浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.04.20

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 753-760.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.04.20

浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析

苗苗(), 迮寒露, 吴永华^*()

浙江省农业科学院农村发展研究所,浙江杭州 310021

收稿日期:2020-12-23 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:*吴永华,E-mail:wuyh@zaas.ac.cn
苗苗(1988—),女,河南驻马店人,博士,助理研究员,从事城乡土地资源利用与农村发展问题研究。E-mail:blessmiumiu@163.com
通讯作者: 吴永华
基金资助:
浙江省发改委农业资源区划课题(2020R18A60C06)

Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang Province

MIAO Miao(), ZE Hanlu, WU Yonghua^*()

Institute of Rural Development, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2020-12-23 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-04-25
Contact: WU Yonghua

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于浙江省2000、2010、2020年3期土地利用数据,构建涉及耕地利用转型的图谱分析模型,利用ArcGIS 10.6软件揭示浙江省耕地利用转型的时空演变特征。结果表明,浙江省耕地利用转型以林地占补和向建设用地转出为主,空间上由杭嘉湖平原、杭绍甬地区、甬温沿海经济带向浙中盆地丘陵区呈“C”型集聚,“东占西补”特征明显;耕地利用转型数量和空间分离度增加,耕地面积“占大于补”,但占补缺口正在缩小;耕地利用转型以后期变化型(即变化发生在2010—2020年)为主,林地是耕地补充的主要来源,建设用地占用耕地问题严重。基于此,建议持续盘活存量、带动增量、应对变量,推动山水林田湖草系统治理逻辑下的耕地资源优化配置和土地利用空间正义,实现耕地补充和建设用地保障“双向平衡”,生态保护、粮食安全、发展空间“三位一体”。

关键词: 耕地利用转型, 时空特征, 地学信息图谱, 浙江省

Abstract:

Based on the land use data of Zhejiang in 2000, 2010 and 2020, geo-information tupu model regarding cultivated land use transition was constructed, and the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang Province were revealed by using ArcGIS 10.6 software. It was shown that the cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang mainly consisted of forestland occupation and supplementation, as well as transition to construction land, with a C-shaped spatial agglomeration, and presented remarkable characteristics of east-occupation-west-supplementation, and the spatial distribution changed from Hangjiahu plain, Hangshaoyong region and Yongwen coastal economic belt to the basin hilly region. The amount and separation degree of cultivated land use transition increased, and the occupation area was greater than the supplementation area, yet the gap narrowed. The cultivated land use transition mainly happened in the period of 2010-2020. The forestland was the main source for cultivated land supplementation, and the occupation of cultivated land by construction land was a major concern. In view of this, it was suggested that the stock should be revitalized, the increment should be promoted, and the variables should be tackled. What’s more, the allocation of cultivated land resources should be optimized and the justice of land use should be ensured to finally realize the bidirectional balance of cultivated land supplementation and construction land safeguard, as well as the coordination of trinity system, which consists of ecological protection, food security and development space.

Key words: cultivated land use transition, spatio-temporal characteristics, geo-information tupu, Zhejiang Province

中图分类号:

S-9
F301

苗苗, 迮寒露, 吴永华. 浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 753-760.

MIAO Miao, ZE Hanlu, WU Yonghua. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 753-760.

图/表 6

参考文献 24

[1]	宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(3):471-487.
	SONG X Q. Discussion on land use transition research framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(3):471-487.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	KIM I, KWON H. Assessing the impacts of urban land use changes on regional ecosystem services according to urban green space policies via the patch-based cellular automata model[J]. Environmental Management, 2021,67(1):192-204. URL PMID
[3]	YOKOTA S, AIHARA Y, THAITAKOO D. Land use transition and possibility of climate change adaptation by rice farmers around the industrial estate in Bangkok’s urban fringe[J]. Urban and Regional Planning Review, 2020,7:22-42.
[4]	KOGA N, SHIMODA S, SHIRATO Y, et al. Assessing changes in soil carbon stocks after land use conversion from forest land to agricultural land in Japan[J]. Geoderma, 2020,377:114487.
[5]	FERNANDES M M, FERNANDES M R D M, GARCIA J R, et al. Assessment of land use and land cover changes and valuation of carbon stocks in the Sergipe semiarid region, Brazil: 1992-2030[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,99:104795.
[6]	龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带土地利用变化时空模拟及其对策[J]. 地理研究, 2001,20(6):660-668.
	LONG H L, LI X B. Spatio-temporal modelling of land use changes in transect of the Yangtse River and corresponding countermeasures[J]. Geographical Research, 2001,20(6):660-668.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	龙花楼, 李秀彬. 中国耕地转型与土地整理: 研究进展与框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006,25(5):67-76.
	LONG H L, LI X B. Cultivated-land transition and land consolidation and reclamation in China: research progress and frame[J]. Progress in Geography, 2006,25(5):67-76.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012,31(2):131-138.
	LONG H L. Land use transition and rural transformation development[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(2):131-138.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	胡守庚, 刘越岩, 吴新群, 等. 鄂西北山区耕地压力动态变化特征及成因分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010,19(7):765-769.
	HU S G, LIU Y Y, WU X Q, et al. Analysis on characteristics and forming reasons of pressure of cultivated land in northwest mountainous area of Hubei Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2010,19(7):765-769.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	张佰林, 杨庆媛, 鲁春阳, 等. 不同经济发展阶段区域土地利用变化及对经济发展的影响: 以重庆市40个区县为例[J]. 经济地理, 2011,31(9):1539-1544.
	ZHANG B L, YANG Q Y, LU C Y, et al. Effect on economic development of regional land use change in different development phase: forty counties in Chongqing as the research object[J]. Economic Geography, 2011,31(9):1539-1544.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	刘永强, 龙花楼. 黄淮海平原农区土地利用转型及其动力机制[J]. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):666-679.
	LIU Y Q, LONG H L. Land use transitions and their dynamic mechanism in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(4):666-679.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	宋小青, 吴志峰, 欧阳竹. 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(4):435-447.
	SONG X Q, WU Z F, OUYANG Z. Changes of cultivated land function in China since 1949[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(4):435-447.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	黄锦东. 福建省粮食生产的耕地利用效应时空分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020,32(5):923-930.
	HUANG J D. Spatial and temporal analysis into effect of cultivated land use in grain production in Fujian Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020,32(5):923-930.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	吕冰, 王越, 李炆颖, 等. 沈阳经济区土地利用转型与社会经济发展的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):252-258.
	LYU B, WANG Y, LI W Y, et al. Relationship between land use transformation and social-economic development in Shenyang economic zone[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,40(4):252-258.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	卢新海, 唐一峰, 易家林, 等. 基于空间计量模型的耕地利用转型对农业经济增长影响研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(6):53-61.
	LU X H, TANG Y F, YI J L, et al. Study on the impact of cultivated land use transition on agricultural economic growth based on spatial econometric model[J]. China Land Science, 2019,33(6):53-61.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	苏康传, 杨庆媛, 张佰林, 等. 山区农村土地利用转型与小农经济变迁耦合机理[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(2):399-413.
	SU K C, YANG Q Y, ZHANG B L, et al. The coupling mechanism between rural land use transition and small-scale peasant economy change in mountainous areas[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(2):399-413.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	戈大专, 龙花楼, 杨忍. 中国耕地利用转型格局及驱动因素研究: 基于人均耕地面积视角[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(2):273-283.
	GE D Z, LONG H L, YANG R. The pattern and mechanism of farmland transition in China from the perspective of per capita farmland area[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(2):273-283.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	陈述彭, 岳天祥, 励惠国. 地学信息图谱研究及其应用[J]. 地理研究, 2000,19(4):337-343.
	CHEN S P, YUE T X, LI H G. Studies on geo-informatic tupu and its application[J]. Geographical Research, 2000,19(4):337-343.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	张文慧, 吕晓, 史洋洋, 等. 黄河流域土地利用转型图谱特征[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020,34(8):80-88.
	ZHANG W H, LYU X, SHI Y Y, et al. Graphic characteristics of land use transition in the Yellow River Basin[J]. China Land Science, 2020,34(8):80-88.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	CHEN W X, ZHAO H B, LI J F, et al. Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic tupu method[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,701:134690.
[21]	唐常春, 李亚平. 多中心城市群土地利用/覆被变化地学信息图谱研究: 以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020,39(11):2626-2641.
	TANG C C, LI Y P. Geo-information tupu process of land use/cover change in polycentric urban agglomeration: a case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(11):2626-2641.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	冉彩虹, 李阳兵, 梁鑫源. 重庆市耕地利用转型演变特征研究[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,37(3):119-128.
	RAN C H, LI Y B, LIANG X Y. Evolution characteristics and occurrence mechanisms of cultivated land use transition in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 2020,37(3):119-128.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	牛善栋, 方斌, 崔翠, 等. 乡村振兴视角下耕地利用转型的时空格局及路径分析: 以淮海经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(8):1908-1925.
	NIU S D, FANG B, CUI C, et al. The spatial-temporal pattern and path of cultivated land use transition from the perspective of rural revitalization: taking Huaihai Economic Zone as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(8):1908-1925.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	史洋洋, 吕晓, 郭贯成, 等. 基于GIS和空间计量的耕地利用转型时空格局及其驱动机制研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019,33(11):51-60.
	SHI Y Y, LYU X, GUO G C, et al. Temporal-spatial pattern and driving mechanism of cultivated land use transition based on GIS and spatial econometric model[J]. China Land Science, 2019,33(11):51-60.(in Chinese with English abstract)

时期 Period	转型类别 Transition type	图谱单元数 Number of tupu unit	面积 Area/km²	变化率 Rate of change/%	空间分离度 Degree of separation
2000—2010	2→1	7 609	5 364.92	25.12	1.19
	1→2	6 179	5 650.66	26.45	1.02
	1→5	2 584	3 090.95	14.47	1.20
	5→1	2 259	990.96	4.64	3.50
	4→1	1 083	552.72	2.59	4.35
	1→4	1 060	738.84	3.46	3.22
	3→1	746	238.89	1.12	8.36
	1→3	729	274.30	1.28	7.19
	1→6	12	4.27	0.02	59.22
	6→1	13	3.52	0.02	74.80
	合计Total	22 274	16 910.03	79.17	164.05
2010—2020	1→2	7 635	5 975.66	23.74	1.16
	2→1	6 277	5 810.98	23.08	1.08
	1→5	3 661	3 583.41	14.23	1.34
	5→1	2 669	1 825.55	7.25	2.25
	1→4	1 332	722.24	2.87	4.01
	4→1	1 062	773.94	3.07	3.34
	1→3	900	281.85	1.12	8.44
	3→1	754	247.16	0.98	8.81
	1→6	17	4.82	0.02	67.84
	6→1	13	2.86	0.01	100.09
	合计Total	24 320	19 228.47	76.37	198.36

时期 Period	转型类别 Transition type	图谱单元数 Number of tupu unit	面积 Area/km²	变化率 Rate of change/%	空间分离度 Degree of separation
2000—2010	2→1	7 609	5 364.92	25.12	1.19
	1→2	6 179	5 650.66	26.45	1.02
	1→5	2 584	3 090.95	14.47	1.20
	5→1	2 259	990.96	4.64	3.50
	4→1	1 083	552.72	2.59	4.35
	1→4	1 060	738.84	3.46	3.22
	3→1	746	238.89	1.12	8.36
	1→3	729	274.30	1.28	7.19
	1→6	12	4.27	0.02	59.22
	6→1	13	3.52	0.02	74.80
	合计Total	22 274	16 910.03	79.17	164.05
2010—2020	1→2	7 635	5 975.66	23.74	1.16
	2→1	6 277	5 810.98	23.08	1.08
	1→5	3 661	3 583.41	14.23	1.34
	5→1	2 669	1 825.55	7.25	2.25
	1→4	1 332	722.24	2.87	4.01
	4→1	1 062	773.94	3.07	3.34
	1→3	900	281.85	1.12	8.44
	3→1	754	247.16	0.98	8.81
	1→6	17	4.82	0.02	67.84
	6→1	13	2.86	0.01	100.09
	合计Total	24 320	19 228.47	76.37	198.36

类型 Type	转型变化 Transition	面积 Area/km²	贡献率 Contribution rate/%
Ⅰ	1→2→2	3 549.74	8.91
	1→5→5	1 608.41	4.04
	2→1→1	1 603.70	4.03
	5→1→1	596.03	1.50
	4→1→1	288.24	0.72
	小计Sub-total	7 977.08	20.03
Ⅱ	2→1→2	3 298.34	8.28
	1→2→1	1 578.73	3.96
	1→5→1	1 204.39	3.02
	1→4→1	364.78	0.92
	5→1→5	283.49	0.71
	小计Sub-total	6 968.13	17.50
Ⅲ	2→2→1	3 941.37	9.90
	1→1→5	2 859.75	7.18
	1→1→2	2 408.93	6.05
	1→1→4	485.87	1.22
	5→5→1	356.48	0.90
	小计Sub-total	10 531.70	26.45
Ⅳ	1→2→5	331.08	0.83
	2→1→5	288.93	0.73
	2→5→1	186.15	0.47
	1→5→2	176.17	0.44
	1→4→5	124.78	0.31
	1→3→2	107.5	0.27
	1→2→3	106.62	0.27
	5→2→1	105.81	0.27
	小计Sub-total	2 634.18	6.62
Ⅴ	1→1→1	11 707.75	29.40
总计Total	39 818.84	100.00

类型 Type	转型变化 Transition	面积 Area/km²	贡献率 Contribution rate/%
Ⅰ	1→2→2	3 549.74	8.91
	1→5→5	1 608.41	4.04
	2→1→1	1 603.70	4.03
	5→1→1	596.03	1.50
	4→1→1	288.24	0.72
	小计Sub-total	7 977.08	20.03
Ⅱ	2→1→2	3 298.34	8.28
	1→2→1	1 578.73	3.96
	1→5→1	1 204.39	3.02
	1→4→1	364.78	0.92
	5→1→5	283.49	0.71
	小计Sub-total	6 968.13	17.50
Ⅲ	2→2→1	3 941.37	9.90
	1→1→5	2 859.75	7.18
	1→1→2	2 408.93	6.05
	1→1→4	485.87	1.22
	5→5→1	356.48	0.90
	小计Sub-total	10 531.70	26.45
Ⅳ	1→2→5	331.08	0.83
	2→1→5	288.93	0.73
	2→5→1	186.15	0.47
	1→5→2	176.17	0.44
	1→4→5	124.78	0.31
	1→3→2	107.5	0.27
	1→2→3	106.62	0.27
	5→2→1	105.81	0.27
	小计Sub-total	2 634.18	6.62
Ⅴ	1→1→1	11 707.75	29.40
总计Total	39 818.84	100.00

浙江省耕地利用转型时空演变特征分析

Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land use transition in Zhejiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	褚田芬, 雷玲, 李勤锋, 吴平, 洪文杰, 郑蔚然. 浙江省西瓜中农药残留风险评估[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1153-1160.
[2]	冀玄玄, 姜军松. 中国化肥面源污染的时空特征及其影响因素——基于1997—2020年的省级面板数据[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1185-1198.
[3]	陈钰佩, 单英杰, 陆若辉, 朱伟锋, 孔海民. 浙江省主要作物的施肥现状与减施潜力[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2566-2574.
[4]	汪洁, 陆若辉, 朱伟锋, 陈钰佩, 单英杰. 浙江省主要粮食作物秸秆还田替代化肥的潜力[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1853-1863.
[5]	傅嘉艺, 童磊, 苏飞, 郑珂, 厉海林, 曹轶蓉, 苏娜. 浙江省“农创客”在乡村发展中的带动效应及其影响路径[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1796-1805.
[6]	郭亮玺, 胡豹. 浙江省政策性农业保险机制创新回顾与改革对策研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1081-1090.
[7]	王丽娟, 陈秧分, 徐梦洁. 乡村振兴视域下农业跨区域投资区位及其决策机制——以浙江省为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 841-850.
[8]	顾兴国, 闵庆文, 王英, 王斌. 浙江省农业文化遗产保护进展、问题与对策[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 397-408.
[9]	傅琳琳, 毛晓红, 毛小报, 蔡日旋. 浙江省2013—2018年粮食综合生产能力评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1748-1758.
[10]	叶晗, 吴博文, 许红卫, 干牧野, 张晶, 王珂. 基于地理大数据的省域休闲农业空间格局及其影响因素研究——以浙江省为例[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1264-1274.
[11]	张惠云, 秦丽杰, 贾利. 吉林省水稻生产的碳足迹与水足迹时空变化特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 974-983.
[12]	孟幼青, 汪恩国, 陈吴健, 李艳敏, 程帆, 孟敏霞. 浙江省亚洲柑橘木虱黄龙病病原分布与消长规律[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 464-469.
[13]	傅琳琳, 毛小报, 毛晓红, 李海涛, 王瑾. 浙江农业可持续发展水平与区域差异综合评价——基于高质量发展视角[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1880-1889.
[14]	汪玉磊, 汪洁, 单英杰, 朱有为. 基于耕地因素分解的浙江省粮食生产变化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1605-1610.
[15]	余鹏1， 2，王俊梅1， 2，叶胜海2，翟荣荣2，朱国富2，金庆生2，张小明2， *. 播期对浙江省常规晚粳稻品质性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(5): 724-.