浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 739-752.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.04.19
刘俊1(
), 朱德泉1,2,*(
), 于从羊1, 薛康1, 张顺1, 廖娟1
收稿日期:2020-09-03
出版日期:2021-04-25
发布日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:*朱德泉,E-mail:dqzhu@sina.com通讯作者:
朱德泉
基金资助:
LIU Jun1(
), ZHU Dequan11,2,*(
), YU Congyang1, XUE Kang1, ZHANG Shun1, LIAO Juan1
Received:2020-09-03
Online:2021-04-25
Published:2021-04-25
Contact:
ZHU Dequan1
摘要:
针对现有水稻排种器采用被动充种存在充种性能差、高速排种精度低的问题,设计了一种舀勺型孔轮式水稻精量排种器。阐述了该排种器的基本结构和工作原理,确定了排种轮、舀勺、型孔、护种板等关键零部件的结构参数,建立了排种器充种过程的力学模型。以冈优898 种子为试验材料,利用离散元法,选取排种轮转速、型孔倾角为试验因素,以排种合格率、重播率和漏播率为评价指标,进行单因素试验、对比试验和二因素五水平正交旋转组合试验,建立排种性能指标与试验因素之间的回归模型,利用响应面法分析了各试验因素对排种性能的影响规律,并采用多目标优化方法,确定了最佳参数组合。优化结果表明:排种轮转速为25.94 r·min -1、型孔倾角为34.75°时,排种器的排种性能最佳,排种合格率、重播率、漏播率分别为87.55%、9.79%、2.66%。为验证仿真结果的可靠性和排种器的适应性,以丰两优3948、冈优898、冈优3551 3个水稻品种种子为试验材料,对排种器进行台架性能试验和田间播种试验。试验结果表明:台架试验与仿真结果基本一致,丰两优3948、冈优898、冈优3551种子的排种合格率分别为84.40%、84.53%、83.74%;田间播种合格率分别为81.34%、82.13%、80.67%,3个水稻品种种子排种性能皆满足水稻精量播种要求。研究结果可为舀勺型孔轮式水稻精量排种器的结构优化和性能提升提供参考。
中图分类号:
刘俊, 朱德泉, 于从羊, 薛康, 张顺, 廖娟. 舀勺型孔轮式水稻精量排种器设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(4): 739-752.
LIU Jun, ZHU Dequan1, YU Congyang, XUE Kang, ZHANG Shun, LIAO Juan. Design and experiment on scoop hole-wheel precision seed-metering device for rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(4): 739-752.
图1 排种器结构与工作原理图 a,排种器轴侧图;b,工作原理与排种过程。1,法兰盘;2,排种轴;3,排种轮;4,限种板;5,壳体;6,清种毛刷;7,型孔;8,护种板;9,阻种毛刷;10,舀勺。
Fig.1 Diagram of structure and working principle of seed-metering device a, Isometric view of seed-metering device; b, Working principle and seed-metering process. 1, Flange; 2, Seeding shaft; 3, Seeding wheel; 4, Limit plate; 5, Shield shell; 6, Cleaning brush; 7, Shaped hole; 8, Protection guard; 9, Resist brush; 10, Scoop.
图2 舀勺结构示意图 a,排种轮局部剖视图;b,舀勺示意图。1,舀勺;2,型孔;3,排种轮。w1为舀勺宽度,mm;t1为舀勺厚度,mm;l1为舀勺内长度,mm。
Fig.2 Schematic diagram of scoop structure a, Partial sectional view of seeding wheel; b, Schematic diagram of scoop. 1, Scoop; 2, Shaped hole; 3, Seeding wheel. w1 was the width of scoop, mm; t1 was the thickness of scoop, mm; l1 was the length of scoop, mm.
| 品种(尺寸等级) Variety (Size level) | 平均长度 Average length/mm | 平均宽度 Average width/mm | 平均厚度 Average thickness/mm | 种子球度 Seed sphericity/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948(大)Fengliangyou3948(Large) | 9.63 | 2.52 | 2.08 | 38.38 |
| 冈优898(中) Gangyou898(Medium) | 8.29 | 2.96 | 2.10 | 44.89 |
| 冈优3551(小) Gangyou3551(Small) | 7.77 | 3.14 | 2.16 | 48.25 |
表1 三个水稻品种种子尺寸和球度
Table 1 Seed size and sphericity of three varieties of rice
| 品种(尺寸等级) Variety (Size level) | 平均长度 Average length/mm | 平均宽度 Average width/mm | 平均厚度 Average thickness/mm | 种子球度 Seed sphericity/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948(大)Fengliangyou3948(Large) | 9.63 | 2.52 | 2.08 | 38.38 |
| 冈优898(中) Gangyou898(Medium) | 8.29 | 2.96 | 2.10 | 44.89 |
| 冈优3551(小) Gangyou3551(Small) | 7.77 | 3.14 | 2.16 | 48.25 |
| 品种 Variety | 平躺 Lying down | 侧卧 Side lying | 竖立 Erect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948 | 48.98 | 40.43 | 10.59 |
| Fengliangyou 3948 | |||
| 冈优898 | 50.59 | 36.59 | 12.82 |
| Gangyou 898 | |||
| 冈优3551 | 50.88 | 34.98 | 14.14 |
| Gangyou 3551 |
表2 水稻种子充入型孔姿态概率
Table 2 Pose probability of rice seed in filling hole %
| 品种 Variety | 平躺 Lying down | 侧卧 Side lying | 竖立 Erect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948 | 48.98 | 40.43 | 10.59 |
| Fengliangyou 3948 | |||
| 冈优898 | 50.59 | 36.59 | 12.82 |
| Gangyou 898 | |||
| 冈优3551 | 50.88 | 34.98 | 14.14 |
| Gangyou 3551 |
图3 护种板结构 a,弧形护种板;b,开有槽口的弧形护种板;c,槽口内装毡毛的弧形护种板。H为护种板宽度,单位mm;H1为槽口宽度,单位mm。
Fig.3 Structure of protection guard a, Curved seed protection belt; b, Curved seed protection belt with notch; c,Curved seed protection belt with felted hair in large notch. H was the width of seed protection belt, mm; H1 was the width of notch, mm.3种护种板厚度H均为32 mm,槽口宽度H1长度应满足式(9)要求。
| 护种板类型 Type of protection guard | 合格率 Qualified rate/% | 重播率 Replay rate/% | 漏播率 Missing rate/% | 穴距变异系数 Variation coefficient of hole distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 弧形护种板Curved seed protection guard | 76.54 | 16.93 | 6.53 | 15.57 |
| 开有槽口的弧形护种板Curved seed protection guard with small notch | 82.27 | 12.80 | 4.93 | 9.60 |
| 槽口内装毡毛的弧形护种板 | 84.00 | 11.33 | 4.67 | 8.57 |
| Curved seed protection guard with felted hair in large notch |
表3 试验结果
Table 3 Test results
| 护种板类型 Type of protection guard | 合格率 Qualified rate/% | 重播率 Replay rate/% | 漏播率 Missing rate/% | 穴距变异系数 Variation coefficient of hole distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 弧形护种板Curved seed protection guard | 76.54 | 16.93 | 6.53 | 15.57 |
| 开有槽口的弧形护种板Curved seed protection guard with small notch | 82.27 | 12.80 | 4.93 | 9.60 |
| 槽口内装毡毛的弧形护种板 | 84.00 | 11.33 | 4.67 | 8.57 |
| Curved seed protection guard with felted hair in large notch |
图4 水稻种子充种过程受力分析 Fr为种子的离心力,单位N;F1为舀勺对种子的支持力,单位N;F2为种子群的挤压力,单位N;G为种子自身的重力,单位N;f1为舀勺内壁对种子的摩擦力,单位N;f2为种子群内摩擦力,单位N;α为重力方向与x轴方向的夹角,单位(°);β为F1方向与x轴方向的夹角,单位(°)。
Fig.4 Stress analysis of rice seed in seed-filling process Fr was centrifugal force of seed, N; F1 was support force of scoop to seed, N; F2 was pushing force among seed groups, N; G was gravity of seed, N; f1 was friction force between inner surface of scoop and seed, N; f2 was friction force in seed groups, N; α was the angle between direction of gravity and x axis, (°); β was the angle between direction of F1 and x axis, (°).
| 项目 Item | 剪切模量 Shear modulus/Pa | 泊松比 Poisson’s ratio | 密度 Density/ (kg·m-3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 种子Seed | 1.15×107 | 0.30 | 1 163 |
| 不锈钢Stainless steel | 7.00×1010 | 0.28 | 7 800 |
| 塑料Plastic | 1.77×106 | 0.50 | 1 180 |
| 毡毛Felt | 1.00×108 | 0.40 | 1 150 |
表4 材料属性
Table 4 Material properties
| 项目 Item | 剪切模量 Shear modulus/Pa | 泊松比 Poisson’s ratio | 密度 Density/ (kg·m-3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 种子Seed | 1.15×107 | 0.30 | 1 163 |
| 不锈钢Stainless steel | 7.00×1010 | 0.28 | 7 800 |
| 塑料Plastic | 1.77×106 | 0.50 | 1 180 |
| 毡毛Felt | 1.00×108 | 0.40 | 1 150 |
图5 水稻模型 a,三轴尺寸;b,EDEM模型。l为水稻种子长度,单位mm;w为水稻种子宽度,单位mm;t为水稻种子厚度,单位mm。
Fig.5 Rice model a, Triaxial size; b, EDEM model. l was length of rice seeds, mm; w was width of rice seeds, mm; t was thickness of rice seeds, mm.
| 项目 Item | 恢复系数 Coefficient of restitution | 静摩擦系数 Coefficient of static friction | 动摩擦系数 Coefficient of rolling friction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 种子-种子Seed-seed | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.01 |
| 种子-塑料 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 |
| Seed-plastic | |||
| 种子-不锈钢 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.01 |
| Seed-stainless steel | |||
| 种子-毡毛 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.02 |
| Seed-felt |
表5 材料接触系数
Table 5 Coefficients of materials
| 项目 Item | 恢复系数 Coefficient of restitution | 静摩擦系数 Coefficient of static friction | 动摩擦系数 Coefficient of rolling friction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 种子-种子Seed-seed | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.01 |
| 种子-塑料 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 |
| Seed-plastic | |||
| 种子-不锈钢 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.01 |
| Seed-stainless steel | |||
| 种子-毡毛 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.02 |
| Seed-felt |
图6 EDEM排种过程种子运动仿真 a,充种过程;b,排种过程。
Fig.6 EDEM simulation of seed motion of seed-metering process a. Process of seed-filling; b. Process of seed-metering.
图9 不同转速下2种排种器的排种性能 a.不同转速下2种排种器的合格率;b.不同转速下2种排种器的漏播率。
Fig.9 Seeding performance of the two seed-metering devices at different speeds a, Qualified rate of the two seed-metering devices at different speeds; b, Missing rate of the two seed-metering devices at different speeds.
| 编码 Code | X1:排种轮转速 Rotating speed of seeding wheel/(r·min-1) | X2:型孔倾角 Hole inclination of seeding wheel/(°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.414 | 37.50 | 50.00 |
| 1 | 33.84 | 45.60 |
| 0 | 25.00 | 35.00 |
| -1 | 16.16 | 24.40 |
| -1.414 | 12.50 | 20.00 |
表6 试验因素编码与水平设置
Table 6 Test factors coding and levels setting
| 编码 Code | X1:排种轮转速 Rotating speed of seeding wheel/(r·min-1) | X2:型孔倾角 Hole inclination of seeding wheel/(°) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.414 | 37.50 | 50.00 |
| 1 | 33.84 | 45.60 |
| 0 | 25.00 | 35.00 |
| -1 | 16.16 | 24.40 |
| -1.414 | 12.50 | 20.00 |
| 试验号 No. | 排种轮转速 Rotating speed of seeding wheel | 型孔倾角 Hole inclination of seeding wheel | Y1:合格率 Qualified rate/% | Y2:重播率 Replay rate/% | Y3:漏播率 Missing rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 81.60 | 7.60 | 10.80 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 83.60 | 12.80 | 3.60 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 82.00 | 12.40 | 5.60 |
| 4 | -1 | -1 | 81.20 | 16.00 | 2.80 |
| 5 | 1.414 | 0 | 82.00 | 9.20 | 8.80 |
| 6 | -1.414 | 0 | 78.40 | 19.20 | 2.40 |
| 7 | 0 | 1.414 | 83.60 | 6.40 | 10.00 |
| 8 | 0 | -1.414 | 82.00 | 12.80 | 5.20 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 86.00 | 9.60 | 4.40 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 87.20 | 10.00 | 2.80 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 88.40 | 9.60 | 2.00 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 89.20 | 9.20 | 1.60 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 88.40 | 8.80 | 2.80 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 86.80 | 11.20 | 2.00 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 86.80 | 10.80 | 2.40 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 87.20 | 10.80 | 2.00 |
表7 仿真试验结果
Table 7 Results of simulation experiments
| 试验号 No. | 排种轮转速 Rotating speed of seeding wheel | 型孔倾角 Hole inclination of seeding wheel | Y1:合格率 Qualified rate/% | Y2:重播率 Replay rate/% | Y3:漏播率 Missing rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 81.60 | 7.60 | 10.80 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 83.60 | 12.80 | 3.60 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 82.00 | 12.40 | 5.60 |
| 4 | -1 | -1 | 81.20 | 16.00 | 2.80 |
| 5 | 1.414 | 0 | 82.00 | 9.20 | 8.80 |
| 6 | -1.414 | 0 | 78.40 | 19.20 | 2.40 |
| 7 | 0 | 1.414 | 83.60 | 6.40 | 10.00 |
| 8 | 0 | -1.414 | 82.00 | 12.80 | 5.20 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 86.00 | 9.60 | 4.40 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 87.20 | 10.00 | 2.80 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 88.40 | 9.60 | 2.00 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 89.20 | 9.20 | 1.60 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 88.40 | 8.80 | 2.80 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 86.80 | 11.20 | 2.00 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 86.80 | 10.80 | 2.40 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 87.20 | 10.80 | 2.00 |
| 差异来源 Source of variation | 合格率Qualified rate | 重播率Replay rate | 漏播率Missing rate | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | F | P | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | F | P | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | F | P | |||
| 模型Model | 145.10 | 5 | 25.60 | ** | 139.72 | 5 | 27.87 | ** | 125.67 | 5 | 26.63 | ** | ||
| X1 | 6.29 | 1 | 5.54 | * | 61.28 | 1 | 61.13 | ** | 28.32 | 1 | 30.01 | ** | ||
| X2 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.12 | 39.83 | 1 | 39.73 | ** | 35.23 | 1 | 37.33 | ** | |||
| X1X2 | 1.96 | 1 | 1.73 | 0.64 | 1 | 0.64 | 4.84 | 1 | 5.13 | * | ||||
| 97.99 | 1 | 86.54 | ** | 37.85 | 1 | 37.75 | ** | 14.04 | 1 | 14.88 | ** | |||
| 38.71 | 1 | 34.14 | ** | 0.13 | 1 | 0.12 | 43.24 | 1 | 45.82 | ** | ||||
| 残差 | 11.34 | 10 | 10.03 | 10 | 9.44 | 10 | ||||||||
| Residual | ||||||||||||||
| 失拟 | 3.42 | 3 | 1.01 | 0.444 4 | 4.91 | 3 | 2.24 | 0.171 6 | 4.08 | 3 | 1.77 | 0.239 3 | ||
| Lack of fit | ||||||||||||||
| 误差 | 7.92 | 7 | 5.12 | 7 | 5.36 | 7 | ||||||||
| Pure error | ||||||||||||||
| 总和Total | 156.44 | 15 | 149.75 | 15 | 135.11 | 15 | ||||||||
表8 回归方程方差分析结果
Table 8 Variance analysis of regression equations
| 差异来源 Source of variation | 合格率Qualified rate | 重播率Replay rate | 漏播率Missing rate | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | F | P | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | F | P | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | F | P | |||
| 模型Model | 145.10 | 5 | 25.60 | ** | 139.72 | 5 | 27.87 | ** | 125.67 | 5 | 26.63 | ** | ||
| X1 | 6.29 | 1 | 5.54 | * | 61.28 | 1 | 61.13 | ** | 28.32 | 1 | 30.01 | ** | ||
| X2 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.12 | 39.83 | 1 | 39.73 | ** | 35.23 | 1 | 37.33 | ** | |||
| X1X2 | 1.96 | 1 | 1.73 | 0.64 | 1 | 0.64 | 4.84 | 1 | 5.13 | * | ||||
| 97.99 | 1 | 86.54 | ** | 37.85 | 1 | 37.75 | ** | 14.04 | 1 | 14.88 | ** | |||
| 38.71 | 1 | 34.14 | ** | 0.13 | 1 | 0.12 | 43.24 | 1 | 45.82 | ** | ||||
| 残差 | 11.34 | 10 | 10.03 | 10 | 9.44 | 10 | ||||||||
| Residual | ||||||||||||||
| 失拟 | 3.42 | 3 | 1.01 | 0.444 4 | 4.91 | 3 | 2.24 | 0.171 6 | 4.08 | 3 | 1.77 | 0.239 3 | ||
| Lack of fit | ||||||||||||||
| 误差 | 7.92 | 7 | 5.12 | 7 | 5.36 | 7 | ||||||||
| Pure error | ||||||||||||||
| 总和Total | 156.44 | 15 | 149.75 | 15 | 135.11 | 15 | ||||||||
图11 台架试验图 1,种床带;2,油泵;3,固定支架;4,控制台;5,照明装置;6,电机;7,排种器。
Fig.11 Diagram of bench test 1, Seed bed belt; 2, Oil pump; 3, Fixed bracket; 4, Control console; 5, Lighting installation; 6, Motor; 7, Seed-metering device.
| 品种 Variety | 合格率 Qualified rate/% | 重播率 Replay rate/% | 漏播率 Missing rate/% | 穴距 Hill distance/mm | 穴距变异系数 Variation coefficient of hill distance/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948 | 84.40 | 8.27 | 7.33 | 205.32 | 7.98 |
| Fengliangyou 3948 | |||||
| 冈优898 | 84.53 | 10.67 | 4.80 | 206.34 | 8.32 |
| Gangyou 898 | |||||
| 冈优3551 | 83.74 | 12.13 | 4.13 | 208.84 | 9.22 |
| Gangyou 3551 |
表9 台架试验结果
Table 9 Results of bench tests
| 品种 Variety | 合格率 Qualified rate/% | 重播率 Replay rate/% | 漏播率 Missing rate/% | 穴距 Hill distance/mm | 穴距变异系数 Variation coefficient of hill distance/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948 | 84.40 | 8.27 | 7.33 | 205.32 | 7.98 |
| Fengliangyou 3948 | |||||
| 冈优898 | 84.53 | 10.67 | 4.80 | 206.34 | 8.32 |
| Gangyou 898 | |||||
| 冈优3551 | 83.74 | 12.13 | 4.13 | 208.84 | 9.22 |
| Gangyou 3551 |
| 品种 Variety | 合格率 Qualified rate/% | 重播率 Replay rate/% | 漏播率 Missing rate/% | 穴距 Hill distance/mm | 穴距变异系数 Variation coefficient of hill distance/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948 | 81.34 | 10.93 | 7.73 | 209.57 | 15.36 |
| Fengliangyou 3948 | |||||
| 冈优898 | 82.13 | 11.87 | 6.00 | 209.12 | 16.48 |
| Gangyou 898 | |||||
| 冈优3551 | 80.67 | 13.73 | 5.60 | 212.73 | 18.36 |
| Gangyou3551 |
表10 田间试验结果
Table 10 Results of field test
| 品种 Variety | 合格率 Qualified rate/% | 重播率 Replay rate/% | 漏播率 Missing rate/% | 穴距 Hill distance/mm | 穴距变异系数 Variation coefficient of hill distance/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰两优3948 | 81.34 | 10.93 | 7.73 | 209.57 | 15.36 |
| Fengliangyou 3948 | |||||
| 冈优898 | 82.13 | 11.87 | 6.00 | 209.12 | 16.48 |
| Gangyou 898 | |||||
| 冈优3551 | 80.67 | 13.73 | 5.60 | 212.73 | 18.36 |
| Gangyou3551 |
| [1] | 罗锡文, 王在满, 曾山, 等. 水稻机械化直播技术研究进展[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019,40(5):1-13. |
| LUO X W, WANG Z M, ZENG S, et al. Recent advances in mechanized direct seeding technology for rice[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019,40(5):1-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | ZHANG M A, WANG Z M, LUO X W, et al. Review of precision rice hill-drop drilling technology and machine for paddy[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2018,11(3):1-11. |
| [3] | 张顺, 杨继涛, 李勇, 等. 水稻内充气力式精量穴直播排种器吸种性能试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019,31(8):1379-1387. |
| ZHANG S, YANG J T, LI Y, et al. Experiment of sucking performance of inside-filling pneumatic type precision hill-drop drilling seed-metering device for rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2019,31(8):1379-1387. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 邢赫, 臧英, 王在满, 等. 水稻气力式播量可调排种器设计与参数优化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(4):20-28. |
| XING H, ZANG Y, WANG Z M, et al. Design and parameter optimization of rice pneumatic seeding metering device with adjustable seeding rate[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(4):20-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 张明华, 罗锡文, 王在满, 等. 水稻精量穴直播机仿形与滑板机构的优化设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017,33(6):18-26. |
| ZHANG M H, LUO X W, WANG Z M, et al. Optimization design and experiment of profiling and slide board mechanism of precision rice hill-drop drilling machine[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(6):18-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | WANG J W, ZHOU W Q, TIAN LI Q, et al. Virtual simulation analysis and verification of seed-filling mechanism for dipper hill-drop precision direct rice seeder[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017,10(6):77-85. |
| [7] | JIA H L, CHEN Y L, ZHAO J L, et al. Design and key parameter optimization of an agitated soybean seed metering device with horizontal seed filling[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2018,11(2):76-87. |
| [8] | 李大鹏, 刘飞, 赵满全, 等. 气力式谷子精量排种器结构设计及性能试验[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019,24(11):141-151. |
| LI D P, LIU F, ZHAO M Q, et al. Structural design and performance test of one pneumatic millet precision seed metering device[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019,24(11):141-151. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 李兰兰. 滑片型孔轮式水稻精量穴播排种器设计与试验[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2019. |
| LI L L. Design and experiment of slider-hole-wheel precision hill direct seed metering device for rice[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | MALEKI M R, JAFARI J F, RAUFAT M H, et al. Evaluation of seed distribution uniformity of a multi-flight auger as a grain drill metering device[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2006,94(4):535-543. |
| [11] | MALEKI M R, MOUAZEN A M, DE KETELAERE B, et al. A new index for seed distribution uniformity evaluation of grain drills[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2006,94(3):471-475. |
| [12] | 刘彩玲, 王亚丽, 都鑫, 等. 摩擦复充种型孔带式水稻精量排种器充种性能分析与验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(4):29-36. |
| LIU C L, WANG Y L, DOU X, et al. Filling performance analysis and verification of cell-belt rice precision seed-metering based on friction and repeated filling principle[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(4):29-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 李兰兰, 朱德泉, 张顺, 等. 滑片型孔轮式水稻精量穴直播排种器设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018,30(12):2153-2160. |
| LI L L, ZHU D Q, ZHANG S, et al. Design and experiment of slider-hole-wheel precision hill-direct-seeding metering device for rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018,30(12):2153-2160. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 王在满, 黄逸春, 王宝龙, 等. 播量无级调节水稻精量排种装置设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(11):9-16. |
| WANG Z M, HUANG Y C, WANG B L, et al. Design and experiment of rice precision metering device with sowing amountstepless adjusting[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(11):9-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 张国忠, 张沙沙, 杨文平, 等. 双腔侧充种式水稻精量穴播排种器的设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(8):9-17. |
| ZHANG G Z, ZHANG S S, YANG W P, et al. Design and experiment of double cavity side-filled precision hole seed metering device for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016,32(8):9-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 中国农业机械化科学研究院. 农业机械设计手册:上册[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007. |
| [17] | 都鑫, 刘彩玲, 姜萌, 等. 自扰动内充型孔轮式玉米精量排种器设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(13):23-34. |
| DU X, LIU C L, JIANG M, et al. Design and experiment of self-disturbance inner-filling cell wheel maize precision seed-metering device[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(13):23-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 周祖锷. 农业物料学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1994. |
| [19] | 田立权, 王金武, 唐汉, 等. 螺旋槽式水稻穴直播排种器设计与性能试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016,47(5):46-52. |
| TIAN L Q, WANG J W, TANG H, et al. Design an performance experiment of helix grooved rice seeding device[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016,47(5):46-52. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 胡国明. 颗粒系统的离散元素法分析仿真[M]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社, 2010. |
| [21] | 朱德泉, 李兰兰, 文世昌, 等. 滑片型孔轮式水稻精量排种器排种性能数值模拟与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(21):17-26. |
| ZHU D Q, LI L L, WEN S C, et al. Numerical simulation and experiment on seeding performance of slide hole-wheel precision seed-metering device for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(21):17-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 任明磊, 樊啟洲. 水稻往复拨叉式排种器设计及其运动过程的离散元法仿真分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016,45(11):139-144. |
| REN M L, FAN Q Z. Design of rice reciprocating fork type metering device and its motion process simulation analysis by discrete element method[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016,45(11):139-144. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 文世昌. 水稻穴直播精量排种器设计与试验研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2018. |
| WEN S C. Design and experimental study of rice precision hill direct seed metering device[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 铺膜穴播机作业质量: NY/T 987—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006. |
| [25] | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 水稻覆土直播机: GB/T 25418—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010. |
| [1] | 罗阳兰, 黄丽玲, 黄世旅, 阎勇, 王灿琴. 羊肚菌WSJD-1的基质配方优化及其在广西地区的栽培技术[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1881-1890. |
| [2] | 裴惠民, 巫明明, 翟荣荣, 叶靖, 金月, 朱仪, 侯建军, 朱国富, 叶胜海. 低镉水稻基因功能与新品种培育研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 2012-2020. |
| [3] | 谭诗逸, 俞国红, 薛向磊, 赵颖雷, 许宝玉, 张成浩. 工厂化水稻育秧盘搬运装置设计与试验[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1545-1555. |
| [4] | 张智, 何豪豪, 郁妙, 许剑锋. 化肥减量配施土壤改良剂对土壤酸度、土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1301-1308. |
| [5] | 林小兵, 黎江, 成艳红, 王斌强, 何绍浪, 黄尚书, 黄欠如. 不同有机物料对土壤微生物生物量、矿质氮含量与水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1309-1318. |
| [6] | 苏扬, 商小兰, 钱忠明, 吴林根, 黄佳琦, 庄海峰, 赵宇飞, 党洪阳, 徐立军. 腐熟剂与生物炭协同强化秸秆还田对土壤质量和水稻生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1139-1148. |
| [7] | 应永飞, 韩东轩, 孟芳, 俞遴, 沈佳栾, 汪开英. 沼液替代化肥对水稻产量、品质和土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 880-891. |
| [8] | 宋欣录, 范书红, 武桄旗, 展梦琪, 侯倩, 李明月, 徐艳. 铜-菲复合污染对分蘖期水稻根系生理特性和污染物积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 521-529. |
| [9] | 雷志伟, 李新欣, 徐恒, 张恒, 朱英, 张华. 利用染色体片段替换系鉴定水稻二化螟抗性QTL[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 530-537. |
| [10] | 谢昶琰, 金雨濛, 张苗, 董青君, 李青, 纪力, 钟平, 陈川, 章安康. 利用河道淤泥开发机插水稻秧苗营养土及其应用效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(3): 538-547. |
| [11] | 兰雪成, 赵凤亮, 张光旭, 李杨, 郭晓红. 纳米氧化锌和纳米氧化硅对水稻种子萌发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 269-277. |
| [12] | 李建强, 魏倩倩, 刘晓霞, 张均华, 朱春权. 优化施肥措施对水稻产量和土壤养分平衡的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 438-446. |
| [13] | 刘胜男, 朱建义, 李明, 赵浩宇, 熊涛, 汤永禄, 周小刚, 李朝苏. 稻茬免耕带旋播种小麦的田间杂草防除效果与小麦产量[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2129-2137. |
| [14] | 徐伟东, 陆强, 姚张良, 王晖, 王瑞森, 郎淑平. 水稻田夏熟杂草多样性特征对不同轮作模式的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2138-2149. |
| [15] | 刘婕, 疏再发, 刘林敏, 叶火香, 周慧娟, 吉庆勇, 何卫中. 茶叶全程机械化的研究与应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(10): 2235-2246. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||