干旱胁迫下不同绣球品种生理响应与抗旱性评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.08

浙江农业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1852-1860.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.10.08

干旱胁迫下不同绣球品种生理响应与抗旱性评价

任倩倩¹^,²(), 孙纪霞¹, 张德顺³, 丁兆堂⁴, 张英杰¹, 张京伟²^,^*()

1.山东省烟台市农业科学研究院蔬菜花卉研究所,山东烟台 265500
2.烟台大学生命科学学院,山东烟台 264005
3.同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,上海 200092
4.青岛农业大学园艺学院,山东青岛 266109

收稿日期:2020-08-25 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-11-02
作者简介:*张京伟,E-mail: jingweizhang.000@163.com
任倩倩(1995—),女,山东滨州人,硕士研究生,主要从事花卉种质评价筛选与生理生化研究。E-mail: rqx77520@163.com
通讯作者: 张京伟
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31770747);山东省农业科技资金(林业科技创新)(2019LY002);烟台市科技计划(2018NCGY056)

Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different Hydrangea varieties under drought stress

REN Qianqian¹^,²(), SUN Jixia¹, ZHANG Deshun³, DING Zhaotang⁴, ZHANG Yingjie¹, ZHANG Jingwei²^,^*()

1. Vegetable and Flower Research Institute, Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai 265500, China
2. College of Life Science, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
3. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
4. College of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China

Received:2020-08-25 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-02
Contact: ZHANG Jingwei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探究不同干旱胁迫对绣球生长的影响,评价其抗旱性。以6个绣球品种为试材,利用盆栽控水法,分别设置常态(CK)、轻度干旱胁迫(T1)、中度干旱胁迫(T2)、重干旱胁迫(T3)和特重干旱胁迫(T4)处理模拟干旱胁迫,测定其生物量、根冠比、叶片相对含水量、细胞膜透性、叶绿素(Chl)和类胡萝卜素(Car)、丙二醛(MDA)、脯氨酸(Pro)、过氧化物酶(POD)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、可溶性糖(SS)和可溶性蛋白(SP)等15个生理指标的动态变化,运用主成分分析法、隶属函数法和聚类分析法对其抗旱性进行综合评价。在干旱胁迫下,各绣球品种的生物量和相对含水量呈下降趋势,根冠比、相对电导率、MDA、Pro和SS呈上升趋势,但各品种上升幅度有所差异,SOD、POD和SP呈先上升后下降的趋势,绣球的光合色素变化规律不明显。6种绣球抗旱性由强到弱排序为:万华镜>爱你的吻>头花>白色天使>花手鞠>夏祭。

关键词: 绣球, 抗旱性评价, 主成分分析, 隶属函数法, 聚类分析

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different drought stresses on the growth of Hydrangea varieties and evaluate their drought resistance, six Hydrangea varieties were used as test materials, and were treated with normal (CK), mild drought stress (T1), moderate drought stress (T2), severe drought stress (T3) and extra severe drought stress (T4) to simulate drought stress. Their biomass, root-shoot ratio, leaf relative water content, cell membrane permeability, chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid (Car), malondialdehyde (MDA), proline (Pro), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), soluble sugar (SS) and soluble protein (SP) were measured. Under drought stress, the biomass and relative water content of each Hydrangea variety showed a downward trend, while the root-shoot ratio, relative conductivity, MDA, Pro and SS showed an upward trend. However, the increase range of each variety was different. SOD, POD and SP showed an upward trend first and then a decreased trend. The change rule of photosynthetic pigment of Hydrangea was not obvious. The order of drought resistance of 6 Hydrangea varieties from strong to weak was as follows: Mangek you>Love You Kiss>Corsage>White Angel>Stockings>Summer Sacrifice.

Key words: Hydrangea, drought resistance evaluation, principal component analysis, subordination function method, cluster analysis

中图分类号:

S685.99

任倩倩, 孙纪霞, 张德顺, 丁兆堂, 张英杰, 张京伟. 干旱胁迫下不同绣球品种生理响应与抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860.

REN Qianqian, SUN Jixia, ZHANG Deshun, DING Zhaotang, ZHANG Yingjie, ZHANG Jingwei. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different Hydrangea varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(10): 1852-1860.

图/表 8

参考文献 30

[1]	孙强, 虞秀明, 姚红军. 绣球属品种资源收集及扦插生根能力比较[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(11):71-73.
	SUN Q, YU X M, YAO H J. Resource collection and comparison of cuttings rooting ability for Hydrangea L.[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2016(11):71-73.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	杨春. 八仙花的栽培管理技术[J]. 农业工程技术(温室园艺), 2014, 34(1):42.
	YANG C. Cultivation and management techniques of Hydrangea[J]. Agriculture Engineering Technology (Greenhouse & Horticulture), 2014, 34(1):42.
[3]	章毅. 5个绣球品种的抗旱性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018.
	ZHANG Y. Study on drought tolerance of 5 cultivars of Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	陈丽飞, 刘越, 李雪萌, 等. 植物抗旱性研究进展[J]. 吉林农业, 2019(2):78-79.
	CHEN L F, LIU Y, LI X M, et al. Research progress of plant drought resistance[J]. Agriculture of Jilin, 2019(2):78-79.
[5]	李艳, 王庆, 刘国宇, 等. 4种地被植物干旱胁迫下的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6):9-15.
	LI Y, WANG Q, LIU G Y, et al. Responses of four ground cover plants to drought stress and the comprehensive evaluation on drought resistance capacity[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(6):9-15.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	谭艳, 彭尽晖. 植物抗旱机理及抗旱性鉴定方法研究进展[J]. 广西农业科学, 2010, 41(5):423-426.
	TAN Y, PENG J H. Research progress on mechanism and identification methods of drought resistance in plants[J]. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 41(5):423-426.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	孟祥丽, 徐坚, 陈文荣, 等. 4种砧木樱桃的抗旱生理特性及抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(3):533-537.
	MENG X L, XU J, CHEN W R, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of four cherry rootstocks by membership function analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(3):533-537.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	邹春蕾, 王丽萍, 辛彬, 等. 不同果形红干椒品系抗旱性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(5):792-797.
	ZOU C L, WANG L P, XIN B, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of chilli pepper with different fruit shapes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(5):792-797.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	许桂芳, 张朝阳, 向佐湘. 利用隶属函数法对4种珍珠菜属过路黄抗旱性的综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2009, 21(1):59-62.
	XU G F, ZHANG Z Y, XIANG Z X. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of four Lysimachia species by using subordinate function[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2009, 21(1):59-62.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	林蝉蝉, 何舟阳, 单文龙, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析综合评价杨凌地区红色鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(4):520-532.
	LIN C C, HE Z Y, SHAN W L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of 12 red table grape cultivars cultivated in Yangling area based on principal component and cluster analyses[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(4):520-532.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	郭燕, 张树航, 李颖, 等. 中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6):1033-1046.
	GUO Y, ZHANG S H, LI Y, et al. Studies on the leaf morphology, anatomical structure and drought resistance evaluation of 238 Chinese chestnut varieties(strains)[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(6):1033-1046.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 等. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11):1378-1382.
	ZHOU G S, MEI F Z, ZHOU Z Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of waterlogging resistance of different wheat varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(11):1378-1382.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	张庆华, 向发云, 曾祥国, 等. 干旱胁迫下不同品种草莓生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(2):30-37.
	ZHANG Q H, XIANG F Y, ZENG X G, et al. Physiological response of different strawberry cultivars under drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(2):30-37.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	邱权, 潘昕, 李吉跃, 等. 青藏高原20种灌木抗旱形态和生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6):562-575. DOI
	QIU Q, PAN X, LI J Y, et al. Morphological traits and physiological characteristics in drought tolerance in 20 shrub species on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(6):562-575.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[15]	董晓晓, 刘雪, 蒋亚蓉, 等. 干旱胁迫对24种宿根花卉生长的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3):125-131.
	DONG X X, LIU X, JIANG Y R, et al. Effect of drought stress on the growth of twenty four perennials[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(3):125-131.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	侯茹平, 蒋景龙, 阳妮, 等. 低温胁迫下8种柑橘的生理响应与抗寒性评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021(6):2013-2022.
	HOU R P, JIANG J L, YANG N, et al. Physiological response and cold resistance evaluation of eight citrus species under low temperature stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021(6):2013-2022. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	金胶胶, 宋子文, 马晓雨, 等. 大青杨对不同干旱胁迫强度的形态和生理响应[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(4):490-496.
	JIN J J, SONG Z W, MA X Y, et al. Morphological and physiological responses of Populus ussuriensis Kom. to drought stress[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(4):490-496.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	王平, 王沛, 孙万斌, 等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2):397-404.
	WANG P, WANG P, SUN W B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of eight Elymus germplasms at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2):397-404.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	李永华, 卢琦, 吴波, 等. 干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1):88-98.
	LI Y H, LU Q, WU B, et al. A review of leaf morphology plasticity linked to plant response and adaptation characteristics in arid ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(1):88-98.(in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
[20]	李州, 王晓娟, 彭丹丹, 等. Na⁺对水分胁迫下白三叶抗氧化防御和有机渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5):175-183.
	LI Z, WANG X J, PENG D D, et al. Effects of Na⁺ on antioxidant defence and accumulation of osmoregulatory substances in white clover under water deficit stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5):175-183.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	邵惠芳, 陈征, 许嘉阳, 等. 两种烟草幼苗叶片对不同强度干旱胁迫的生理响应比较[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(12):1861-1871.
	SHAO H F, CHEN Z, XU J Y, et al. Physiological responses of two tobacco cultivar leaves to different drought stresses during seedling stage[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(12):1861-1871.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	冯慧芳, 薛立, 任向荣, 等. 4种阔叶幼苗对PEG模拟干旱的生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(2):371-382.
	FENG H F, XUE L, REN X R, et al. Physiological responses of four broadleaved seedlings to drought stress simulated by PEG[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(2):371-382.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	卜贤盼, 纠凤凤, 王锋堂, 等. 五唇兰对PEG模拟的干旱胁迫响应研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2020, 28(1):53-61.
	BU X P, JIU F F, WANG F T, et al. Response to drought stress simulated by PEG of Phalaenopsis pulcherrima[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2020, 28(1):53-61.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	肖涵, 张鸿翎, 韩涛, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种宿根花卉生理生化指标的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(5):102-107.
	XIAO H, ZHANG H L, HAN T, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical indices of three species perennial flowers[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(5):102-107.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	曹晶, 姜卫兵, 翁忙玲, 等. 夏秋季旱涝胁迫对红叶石楠光合特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(1):163-172.
	CAO J, JIANG W B, WENG M L, et al. Effects of drought and flooding stress on photosynthetic characteristics of Photinia frasery in summer and autumn[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, 34(1):163-172.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	董小云, 米超, 刘自刚, 等. PEG模拟水分胁迫对白菜型冬油菜幼苗生长及生长特性的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2018, 52(3):313-321.
	DONG X Y, MI C, LIU Z G, et al. Response of winter rapessed seeding growth and physiological characteristics under PEG drought tolerance[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018, 52(3):313-321.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	王好运, 吴峰, 吴昌明, 等. 马尾松不同叶型幼苗对干旱及复水的生长及生理响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(1):1-6.
	WANG H Y, WU F, WU C M, et al. Growth and physiological responses of seedlings with different leaf shapes to drought and re-watering in Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46(1):1-6.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	孔维鹏, 张小艾. 四个无花果品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(增刊1):105-113.
	KONG W P, ZHANG X A. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of four fig varieties to drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(S1):105-113.(in Chinesewith English abstract)
[29]	余家林. 农业多元试验统计[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993:141-192.
[30]	田治国, 王飞, 张文娥, 等. 多元统计分析方法在万寿菊品种抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12):3315-3320.
	TIAN Z G, WANG F, ZHANG W E, et al. Drought-resistance evaluation of marigold cultivars based on multiple statistics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12):3315-3320.(in Chinese with English abstract)

光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment	处理 Treat- ment	品种Variety
光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment	处理 Treat- ment	花手鞠 Stockings	头花 Corsage	爱你的吻 Love You Kiss	白色天使 White Angel	夏祭 Summer Sacrifice	万华镜 Mangek you
Chla	CK	1.22±0.10 Aa	1.28±0.12 Aa	1.21±0.15 Bab	1.18±0.21 Bb	1.06±0.17 ABa	1.10±0.08 Bc
	T1	1.46±0.29 Aa	1.11±0.32 Aa	1.08±0.16 Ba	0.96±0.09 Aa	1.05±0.29Ba	1.10±0.30 Aa
	T2	1.58±0.08 Aa	1.53±0.08 Aa	1.44±0.18 Aa	1.35±0.11 Aa	1.45±0.34 ABa	1.42±0.14 Aa
	T3	1.35±0.22 Ab	1.45±0.18 Ab	1.43±0.12 ABb	1.40±0.07 Ab	1.39±0.09 Aa	1.40±0.11 ABc
	T4	1.54±0.13 Aa	1.41±0.31 Aa	1.35±0.30 ABa	1.34±0.15 Aa	1.48±0.16 ABa	1.44±0.07 Aa
Chlb	CK	0.50±0.06 Aab	0.79±0.49 Aa	0.77±0.06 Bab	0.76±0.08 Cb	0.45±0.10 Bab	0.46±0.02 Cb
	T1	0.98±0.17 Aa	0.86±0.20 Ab	0.72±0.03 Bb	0.57±0.04 Cb	0.49±0.19 Bb	0.52±0.14 Ab
	T2	0.77±0.13 Aa	0.72±0.05 Aa	0.62±0.22 Aa	0.56±0.09 Aa	0.71±0.24 Ba	0.69±0.07 Ba
	T3	0.58±0.14 Ab	0.62±0.14 Ab	0.61±0.08 ABb	0.59±0.04 ABb	0.61±0.17 Aa	0.60±0.06 BCb
	T4	1.19±0.83 Ab	1.12±1.16 Ab	1.27±0.14 Bb	1.68±0.14 Cb	1.75±0.74 Ba	1.07±0.02 BCb
Chla+b	CK	2.48±0.11 Aab	1.94±0.77 Ab	1.93±0.07 Aab	1.87±0.08 ABa	2.35±0.07 Aab	2.39±0.15 Aab
	T1	1.49±0.17 Ca	1.26±0.99 Aa	1.66±0.40 Aa	1.91±0.12 ABa	2.20±0.19 Aa	2.12±0.70 Aa
	T2	2.07±0.21 ABCa	2.16±0.11 Aa	2.32±0.35 Aa	2.41±0.11 Ba	2.15±0.24 Aa	2.16±0.05 Aa
	T3	2.37±0.18 ABa	2.38±0.28 Aa	2.36±0.08 Aa	2.42±0.02 ABa	2.34±0.23 Bb	2.37±0.25 Aa
	T4	1.68±0.84 BCab	1.77±1.14 Abc	1.70±0.11 Aab	1.31±0.63 Aa	1.22±0.15 Cc	1.86±0.15 Aab
Chla/b	CK	0.50±0.16 Bab	0.64±0.60 ABa	0.69±0.20 Babc	0.78±0.29 Cbc	0.66±0.26 BCa	0.56±0.09 Dc
	T1	0.98±0.45 ABa	0.92±0.18 Bb	0.85±0.14 Bb	0.72±0.13 Bb	0.59±0.49 Cb	0.53±0.16 Aab
	T2	0.77±0.21 ABa	0.75±0.13 ABa	0.71±0.40 Aa	0.64±0.19 Aa	0.63±0.56 BCa	0.65±0.21 ABa
	T3	0.58±0.37 ABbc	0.60±0.31 ABb	0.60±0.20 ABb	0.61±0.09 Ab	0.60±0.26 Ba	0.60±0.15 Cc
	T4	1.19±0.90 Ab	1.16±1.44 Ab	1.19±0.44 Bb	1.36±0.29 Bb	1.57±0.58 Aa	1.50±0.08 BCb
Car	CK	2.48±0.05 Ca	2.21±0.08 Aa	2.12±0.06 Bab	1.91±0.07 b	2.05±0.07 Ba	2.21±0.01 Cb
	T1	1.49±0.08 Aa	1.37±0.02 Ab	1.47±0.03 ABb	1.61±0.04 ABb	1.92±0.12 Bb	2.08±0.04 Ab
	T2	2.07±0.05 ABCa	2.12±0.04 Aa	2.18±0.10 Aa	2.30±0.06 Aa	2.30±0.14 Ba	2.24±0.04 Ba
	T3	2.37±0.08 BCbc	2.37±0.07 Abc	2.37±0.04 ABbc	2.39±0.06 Ab	2.37±0.05 ABa	2.38±0.05 Bc
	T4	1.68±0.14 ABab	1.73±0.27 Aab	1.72±0.11 Bb	1.60±0.16 ABb	1.41±0.03 Aa	1.47±0.02 Bb

光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment	处理 Treat- ment	品种Variety
光合色素 Photosynthetic pigment	处理 Treat- ment	花手鞠 Stockings	头花 Corsage	爱你的吻 Love You Kiss	白色天使 White Angel	夏祭 Summer Sacrifice	万华镜 Mangek you
Chla	CK	1.22±0.10 Aa	1.28±0.12 Aa	1.21±0.15 Bab	1.18±0.21 Bb	1.06±0.17 ABa	1.10±0.08 Bc
	T1	1.46±0.29 Aa	1.11±0.32 Aa	1.08±0.16 Ba	0.96±0.09 Aa	1.05±0.29Ba	1.10±0.30 Aa
	T2	1.58±0.08 Aa	1.53±0.08 Aa	1.44±0.18 Aa	1.35±0.11 Aa	1.45±0.34 ABa	1.42±0.14 Aa
	T3	1.35±0.22 Ab	1.45±0.18 Ab	1.43±0.12 ABb	1.40±0.07 Ab	1.39±0.09 Aa	1.40±0.11 ABc
	T4	1.54±0.13 Aa	1.41±0.31 Aa	1.35±0.30 ABa	1.34±0.15 Aa	1.48±0.16 ABa	1.44±0.07 Aa
Chlb	CK	0.50±0.06 Aab	0.79±0.49 Aa	0.77±0.06 Bab	0.76±0.08 Cb	0.45±0.10 Bab	0.46±0.02 Cb
	T1	0.98±0.17 Aa	0.86±0.20 Ab	0.72±0.03 Bb	0.57±0.04 Cb	0.49±0.19 Bb	0.52±0.14 Ab
	T2	0.77±0.13 Aa	0.72±0.05 Aa	0.62±0.22 Aa	0.56±0.09 Aa	0.71±0.24 Ba	0.69±0.07 Ba
	T3	0.58±0.14 Ab	0.62±0.14 Ab	0.61±0.08 ABb	0.59±0.04 ABb	0.61±0.17 Aa	0.60±0.06 BCb
	T4	1.19±0.83 Ab	1.12±1.16 Ab	1.27±0.14 Bb	1.68±0.14 Cb	1.75±0.74 Ba	1.07±0.02 BCb
Chla+b	CK	2.48±0.11 Aab	1.94±0.77 Ab	1.93±0.07 Aab	1.87±0.08 ABa	2.35±0.07 Aab	2.39±0.15 Aab
	T1	1.49±0.17 Ca	1.26±0.99 Aa	1.66±0.40 Aa	1.91±0.12 ABa	2.20±0.19 Aa	2.12±0.70 Aa
	T2	2.07±0.21 ABCa	2.16±0.11 Aa	2.32±0.35 Aa	2.41±0.11 Ba	2.15±0.24 Aa	2.16±0.05 Aa
	T3	2.37±0.18 ABa	2.38±0.28 Aa	2.36±0.08 Aa	2.42±0.02 ABa	2.34±0.23 Bb	2.37±0.25 Aa
	T4	1.68±0.84 BCab	1.77±1.14 Abc	1.70±0.11 Aab	1.31±0.63 Aa	1.22±0.15 Cc	1.86±0.15 Aab
Chla/b	CK	0.50±0.16 Bab	0.64±0.60 ABa	0.69±0.20 Babc	0.78±0.29 Cbc	0.66±0.26 BCa	0.56±0.09 Dc
	T1	0.98±0.45 ABa	0.92±0.18 Bb	0.85±0.14 Bb	0.72±0.13 Bb	0.59±0.49 Cb	0.53±0.16 Aab
	T2	0.77±0.21 ABa	0.75±0.13 ABa	0.71±0.40 Aa	0.64±0.19 Aa	0.63±0.56 BCa	0.65±0.21 ABa
	T3	0.58±0.37 ABbc	0.60±0.31 ABb	0.60±0.20 ABb	0.61±0.09 Ab	0.60±0.26 Ba	0.60±0.15 Cc
	T4	1.19±0.90 Ab	1.16±1.44 Ab	1.19±0.44 Bb	1.36±0.29 Bb	1.57±0.58 Aa	1.50±0.08 BCb
Car	CK	2.48±0.05 Ca	2.21±0.08 Aa	2.12±0.06 Bab	1.91±0.07 b	2.05±0.07 Ba	2.21±0.01 Cb
	T1	1.49±0.08 Aa	1.37±0.02 Ab	1.47±0.03 ABb	1.61±0.04 ABb	1.92±0.12 Bb	2.08±0.04 Ab
	T2	2.07±0.05 ABCa	2.12±0.04 Aa	2.18±0.10 Aa	2.30±0.06 Aa	2.30±0.14 Ba	2.24±0.04 Ba
	T3	2.37±0.08 BCbc	2.37±0.07 Abc	2.37±0.04 ABbc	2.39±0.06 Ab	2.37±0.05 ABa	2.38±0.05 Bc
	T4	1.68±0.14 ABab	1.73±0.27 Aab	1.72±0.11 Bb	1.60±0.16 ABb	1.41±0.03 Aa	1.47±0.02 Bb

渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance	处理 Treat- ment	品种Variety
渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance	处理 Treat- ment	花手鞠 Stockings	头花 Corsage	爱你的吻 Love You Kiss	白色天使 White Angel	夏祭 Summer Sacrifice	万华镜 Mangek you
Pro	CK	4.72±0.796 Ba	10.50±3.72 Ba	13.92±11.18 Ba	10.67±5.58 Da	6.86±2.50 Ca	10.33±2.49 Ca
	T1	5.56±1.35 Bc	11.71±6.43 Babc	15.55±2.80 Ba	14.33±1.26 CDab	8.22±3.19 Cbc	11.06±4.60 Cabc
	T2	15.95±2.43 Aab	12.23±2.49 Bab	20.23±7.75 Ba	19.41±1.90 BCa	8.04±1.55 Cb	15.75±5.69 Cab
	T3	22.66±3.05 Aa	19.14±7.73 Ba	22.04±8.26 Ba	21.79±1.28 ABa	24.27±3.92 Ba	18.60±4.48 ABa
	T4	23.69±8.95 Ac	33.14±12.54 Abc	10.89±8.46 Aab	26.94±1.81Abc	53.39±7.14Aa	26.07±6.37Abc
SS	CK	0.29±0.07 Ba	0.46±0.72 Ca	0.32±0.11 Ca	0.28±0.30 Ca	0.42±0.26 Ba	0.41±0.23 Da
	T1	0.65±0.30 Ba	0.74±0.11 Ca	0.89±0.24 Ca	1.38±1.12 BCa	1.69±1.05 Ba	0.96±0.14 CDa
	T2	1.48±0.80 Bc	1.06±0.31 BCc	3.99±2.52 Bab	2.09±1.20 ABbc	4.85±0.71 Aa	1.28±0.35 Cc
	T3	3.99±1.22 Aab	2.62±1.49 ABb	5.69±1.76 ABa	2.13±0.55 ABb	5.13±0.60 Aa	1.96±0.10 BBb
	T4	5.56±1.92 Aab	3.94±1.46 Ab	7.47±1.22 Aa	3.24±0.79 Ab	5.34±0.80 Aab	3.43±0.57 Ab
SP	CK	18.54±2.83 Aa	140.81±6.02Aab	15.71±0.65 Aab	7.18±2.34 Bc	10.19±4.74 Cbc	10.85±2.38 Bbc
	T1	22.38±2.73 Aab	25.68±9.81 Ab	16.85±3.06 Ab	16.25±3.54 Ab	38.48±6.57 Aa	17.94±1.27 Ab
	T2	19.86±5.97 Aab	21.54±2.22 Aab	15.71±8.63 Ab	14.45±2.88 Ab	27.97±5.31 ABa	16.07±1.62 Ab
	T3	19.14±2.50 Aab	18.35±6.16 Aab	12.95±2.56 Abc	12.83±0.83 Abc	24.66±3.71 Ba	11.81±2.09 Bc
	T4	15.17±4.07 Aa	16.01±6.55 Aa	12.23±3.16 Aa	10.97±3.85 ABa	21.36±10.58 BCa	11.03±0.65 Ba

渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance	处理 Treat- ment	品种Variety
渗透调节物质 Osmotic substance	处理 Treat- ment	花手鞠 Stockings	头花 Corsage	爱你的吻 Love You Kiss	白色天使 White Angel	夏祭 Summer Sacrifice	万华镜 Mangek you
Pro	CK	4.72±0.796 Ba	10.50±3.72 Ba	13.92±11.18 Ba	10.67±5.58 Da	6.86±2.50 Ca	10.33±2.49 Ca
	T1	5.56±1.35 Bc	11.71±6.43 Babc	15.55±2.80 Ba	14.33±1.26 CDab	8.22±3.19 Cbc	11.06±4.60 Cabc
	T2	15.95±2.43 Aab	12.23±2.49 Bab	20.23±7.75 Ba	19.41±1.90 BCa	8.04±1.55 Cb	15.75±5.69 Cab
	T3	22.66±3.05 Aa	19.14±7.73 Ba	22.04±8.26 Ba	21.79±1.28 ABa	24.27±3.92 Ba	18.60±4.48 ABa
	T4	23.69±8.95 Ac	33.14±12.54 Abc	10.89±8.46 Aab	26.94±1.81Abc	53.39±7.14Aa	26.07±6.37Abc
SS	CK	0.29±0.07 Ba	0.46±0.72 Ca	0.32±0.11 Ca	0.28±0.30 Ca	0.42±0.26 Ba	0.41±0.23 Da
	T1	0.65±0.30 Ba	0.74±0.11 Ca	0.89±0.24 Ca	1.38±1.12 BCa	1.69±1.05 Ba	0.96±0.14 CDa
	T2	1.48±0.80 Bc	1.06±0.31 BCc	3.99±2.52 Bab	2.09±1.20 ABbc	4.85±0.71 Aa	1.28±0.35 Cc
	T3	3.99±1.22 Aab	2.62±1.49 ABb	5.69±1.76 ABa	2.13±0.55 ABb	5.13±0.60 Aa	1.96±0.10 BBb
	T4	5.56±1.92 Aab	3.94±1.46 Ab	7.47±1.22 Aa	3.24±0.79 Ab	5.34±0.80 Aab	3.43±0.57 Ab
SP	CK	18.54±2.83 Aa	140.81±6.02Aab	15.71±0.65 Aab	7.18±2.34 Bc	10.19±4.74 Cbc	10.85±2.38 Bbc
	T1	22.38±2.73 Aab	25.68±9.81 Ab	16.85±3.06 Ab	16.25±3.54 Ab	38.48±6.57 Aa	17.94±1.27 Ab
	T2	19.86±5.97 Aab	21.54±2.22 Aab	15.71±8.63 Ab	14.45±2.88 Ab	27.97±5.31 ABa	16.07±1.62 Ab
	T3	19.14±2.50 Aab	18.35±6.16 Aab	12.95±2.56 Abc	12.83±0.83 Abc	24.66±3.71 Ba	11.81±2.09 Bc
	T4	15.17±4.07 Aa	16.01±6.55 Aa	12.23±3.16 Aa	10.97±3.85 ABa	21.36±10.58 BCa	11.03±0.65 Ba

指标 Index	主成分1 Principal component 1	主成分2 Principal component 2	主成分3 Principal component 3	主成分4 Principal component 4
类胡萝卜素含量Carotenoid content	0.439	0.832	0.138	-0.230
相对含水量Relative water content	-0.933	-0.165	-0.004	-0.176
POD活性Peroxidase activity	0.814	0.291	0.073	0.148
Chlb含量Chlorophyll-b content	0.759	0.545	0.132	-0.193
Pro含量Proline content	0.739	-0.086	0.483	-0.068
Chla+b含量Chlorophyll-a+b content	0.667	0.664	0.118	-0.185
MDA含量Malondialdehyde content	0.662	0.240	-0.495	0.206
Chla含量Chlorophyll-a content	-0.277	0.908	-0.039	-0.012
Chla/b含量Chlorophyll a/b content	-0.576	-0.720	-0.174	0.276
SP含量Soluble protein content	0.313	0.710	0.126	0.193
相对电导率Relative conductivity	0.526	0.704	0.109	0.057
SOD活性Superoxide dismutase activity	0.293	0.604	0.442	-0.210
SS含量Soluble sugar content	-0.031	0.148	0.857	0.163
根冠比Root-shoot ratio	-0.300	-0.283	-0.588	0.343
生物量Biomass	0.160	-0.064	0.004	0.869
方差贡献率Variance contribution rate/%	50.67	14.06	10.45	6.76
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/%	50.67	64.73	75.19	81.94

干旱胁迫下不同绣球品种生理响应与抗旱性评价

Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of different Hydrangea varieties under drought stress

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

品种Variety	U1	U2	U3	U4	D
花手鞠Stockings	0.07	0.00	0.98	1.00	0.250
头花Corsage	0.18	0.66	0.99	0.19	0.366
爱你的吻Love You Kiss	0.55	0.40	0.35	0.76	0.517
白色天使White Angel	0.10	0.56	1.00	0.09	0.294
夏祭Summer Sacrifice	0.00	0.54	0.00	0.00	0.092
万华镜Mangek you	1.00	1.00	0.81	0.34	0.920
权重Weight	0.617	0.172	0.128	0.083

[1]	许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848.
[2]	刘国敏, 郑虚, 廖玉娇, 覃叶欣, 覃维治. 嫁接对低温胁迫下马铃薯苗抗寒性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1615-1623.
[3]	谈亚丽, 高梦祥, 李晓洁, 周英杰, 熊健, 曾子琦, 李啸, 杨华. 湖北省主栽核桃在不同采收期的品质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1459-1468.
[4]	江振蓝, 陈付勋, 罗双飞, 罗烨琴, 沙晋明. 基于多光谱变换和主成分分析的土壤全铁含量随机森林模型反演[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1521-1532.
[5]	岳丽, 庄红梅, 祖力皮牙·买买提, 王佳敏, 毛红艳, 张英仙, 尼格尔热依·亚迪卡尔, 于明. 基于主成分分析与聚类分析的芜菁肉质根质地品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 1057-1071.
[6]	刘思彤, 侯宇, 潘家荃, 周桦楠, 崔亮, 万博, 于涛. 甘薯对低温胁迫的生理响应及耐寒性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(4): 767-778.
[7]	谈静如, 胡齐赞, 岳智臣, 陶鹏, 雷娟利, 李必元, 赵彦婷, 臧运祥. 基于叶绿素荧光参数的苗用型大白菜耐热性综合评价体系[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 288-299.
[8]	郭赛赛, 聂智星, 傅鸿妃, 王同林, 邵志勇, 王宏, 郑积荣. 37份辣椒种质资源的表型性状及SRAP遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 300-310.
[9]	潘志洪, 温雪婷, 杨华, 吕文涛, 张俊杰, 肖英平. 番鸭肌肉氨基酸谱发育性变化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(9): 2010-2019.
[10]	董莉莉, 徐志浩, 严灿龙, 范小平, 金泽兰, 王忠华. 基于表型与分子标记对浙贝母不同育种群体的分子鉴定与亲缘关系研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(8): 1719-1730.
[11]	李亚东, 罗小波, 彭潇, 杨光乾, 金月月, 祖贵东, 田欢, 张万萍. 萝卜SNP和InDel分子标记开发及与表型性状关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1055-1066.
[12]	薛贤滨, 贾琼, 陈峥峰, 黎瑞源, 陈庆富, 石桃雄. 基于主成分分析的苦荞麦重组自交系农艺性状综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(4): 748-759.
[13]	叶雷, 张波, 杨学圳, 李小林, 张小平, 谭伟. 竹屑替代木屑栽培毛木耳的可行性及其品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(6): 1416-1426.
[14]	娄茜棋, 梁燕. 五类不同果色番茄种质资源品质分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(3): 582-589.
[15]	张红梅, 王保君, 沈亚强, 程旺大. 浙北地区不同粒形优质粳稻产量和品质对播期调控的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(12): 2751-2762.