浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1648-1660.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.09
收稿日期:
2021-11-06
出版日期:
2022-08-25
发布日期:
2022-08-26
通讯作者:
唐中祺
作者简介:
*唐中祺,E-mail: tangzq@gsau.edu.cn基金资助:
LI Wangxiong1(), ZHANG Yang1, TANG Zhongqi1,*(
), YU Jihua1,2
Received:
2021-11-06
Online:
2022-08-25
Published:
2022-08-26
Contact:
TANG Zhongqi
摘要:
为明确平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄的影响,以番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)184品种为试材,按照氮(N)、磷(P)、钾(K)平衡施肥原理设计4个处理,分别为不施肥(CK0)、常规施肥(CK,每667 m2施N肥23.7 kg、P2O5 38.4 kg、K2O 72.9 kg)、平衡施肥1(T1,每667 m2施N肥38.38 kg、P2O5 16.45 kg、K2O 53.18 kg)、平衡施肥2(T2,施肥量较T1减少10%,每667 m2施N肥33.58 kg、P2O5 14.4 kg、K2O 46.5 kg),研究平衡施肥对番茄生长、品质、产量与矿质元素含量的影响。结果表明,平衡施肥可不同程度促进番茄生长,改善品质,提高矿质元素含量和产量,平衡施肥1(T1)效果最优。与常规施肥(CK)相比,T1处理番茄的株高、叶片数、最大净光合速率和根系活力分别提高9.97%、5.19%、25.13%和95.79%;果实可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、铁、镁、钙元素含量与产量分别提高19.82%、16.09%、15.24%、11.30%、69.06%和15.25%。相关性和主成分分析结果表明,番茄品质和产量等指标之间存在一定的相关性与依存关系。根据综合得分模型发现,T1处理的得分最高,CK0最低,说明平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量和产量影响较大,其中,单果鲜重和维生素C(VC)、磷、钾、铁、锰、锌含量是影响番茄生长和品质的主要因素。因此,平衡施肥1(T1)处理可通过增强番茄叶片光合能力,提高产量和改善果实品质,成为肥料资源合理配置的施肥模式。
中图分类号:
李旺雄, 张洋, 唐中祺, 郁继华. 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄生长、品质、矿质元素含量与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660.
LI Wangxiong, ZHANG Yang, TANG Zhongqi, YU Jihua. Effects of balanced fertilization on growth, quality, mineral elements contents and yield of tomato cultivated in substrate in greenhouse[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1648-1660.
处理 Treatments | 施肥用量Fertilizer dosage | ||
---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CK | 23.70 | 38.40 | 72.90 |
T1 | 38.38 | 16.45 | 53.18 |
T2 | 33.58 | 14.40 | 46.50 |
表1 不同处理施肥用量
Table 1 Fertilizer dosage of different treatments kg·667 m-2
处理 Treatments | 施肥用量Fertilizer dosage | ||
---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | |
CK0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CK | 23.70 | 38.40 | 72.90 |
T1 | 38.38 | 16.45 | 53.18 |
T2 | 33.58 | 14.40 | 46.50 |
处理 Treatments | 株高 Stem length/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameters/mm | 叶片数 Leaf number | 根系活力 Root activity/(mg·g-1·h-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 96.26±2.10 c | 11.64 ±0.70 a | 14.40 ±0.68 b | 0.95±0.12 b |
CK | 115.14±1.42 b | 11.90 ±0.47 a | 15.40±0.40 ab | 0.95±0.15 b |
T1 | 126.62±1.35 a | 12.84 ±0.83 a | 16.20±0.20 a | 1.86±0.11 a |
T2 | 121.28±1.99 ab | 12.24 ±0.84 a | 15.80 ±0.37 ab | 1.11±0.04 b |
表2 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄植株生长的影响
Table 2 Effect of balanced fertilization on plant growth of tomato cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse
处理 Treatments | 株高 Stem length/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameters/mm | 叶片数 Leaf number | 根系活力 Root activity/(mg·g-1·h-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 96.26±2.10 c | 11.64 ±0.70 a | 14.40 ±0.68 b | 0.95±0.12 b |
CK | 115.14±1.42 b | 11.90 ±0.47 a | 15.40±0.40 ab | 0.95±0.15 b |
T1 | 126.62±1.35 a | 12.84 ±0.83 a | 16.20±0.20 a | 1.86±0.11 a |
T2 | 121.28±1.99 ab | 12.24 ±0.84 a | 15.80 ±0.37 ab | 1.11±0.04 b |
处理 Treatments | 叶绿素a Chl a | 叶绿素b Chl b | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids | 叶绿素a+b Chl a+b |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 1.23±0.03 b | 0.24±0.01 b | 0.53±0.01 b | 1.47±0.03 b |
CK | 1.28±0.05 b | 0.19±0.01 c | 0.54±0.01 b | 1.47±0.05 b |
T1 | 2.15±0.05 a | 0.39±0.01 a | 0.91±0.01 a | 2.54±0.02 a |
T2 | 2.09±0.03 a | 0.36±0.01 a | 0.86±0.01 a | 2.45±0.06 a |
表3 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄植株光合色素含量的影响
Table 3 Effect of balanced fertilization on photosynthetic pigment content of tomato plants cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse mg·g-1
处理 Treatments | 叶绿素a Chl a | 叶绿素b Chl b | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids | 叶绿素a+b Chl a+b |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 1.23±0.03 b | 0.24±0.01 b | 0.53±0.01 b | 1.47±0.03 b |
CK | 1.28±0.05 b | 0.19±0.01 c | 0.54±0.01 b | 1.47±0.05 b |
T1 | 2.15±0.05 a | 0.39±0.01 a | 0.91±0.01 a | 2.54±0.02 a |
T2 | 2.09±0.03 a | 0.36±0.01 a | 0.86±0.01 a | 2.45±0.06 a |
处理 Treatments | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 505.4±17.2 a | 6.48±0.57 c | 508.8±98.9 b | 16.32±2.09 c |
CK | 435.8 ±10.1 b | 8.88±0.24 b | 642.8±34.6 b | 19.90±0.49 bc |
T1 | 403.8±9.0 bc | 10.12±0.24 a | 1 020.8±152.2 a | 24.90±0.91 a |
T2 | 393.8±8.6 c | 10.84±0.25 a | 864.4±82.0 ab | 22.38±0.81 ab |
表4 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄光合作用的影响
Table 4 Effect of balanced fertilization on photosynthesis of tomato plants cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse
处理 Treatments | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 505.4±17.2 a | 6.48±0.57 c | 508.8±98.9 b | 16.32±2.09 c |
CK | 435.8 ±10.1 b | 8.88±0.24 b | 642.8±34.6 b | 19.90±0.49 bc |
T1 | 403.8±9.0 bc | 10.12±0.24 a | 1 020.8±152.2 a | 24.90±0.91 a |
T2 | 393.8±8.6 c | 10.84±0.25 a | 864.4±82.0 ab | 22.38±0.81 ab |
处理 Treatment | 果实硬度 Hardness/(kg·cm-2) | 单果鲜重 Single fruit fresh weight/g | 单果干重 Single fruit dry weight/g | 果形指数 Shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 1.72±0.09 c | 77.34±0.74 b | 6.07±0.24 c | 0.67±0.02 a |
CK | 2.17±0.15 b | 104.29±1.90 ab | 11.99±0.83 a | 0.67±0.01 a |
T1 | 2.94±0.07 a | 112.87±1.71 a | 12.17±0.86 a | 0.69±0.01 a |
T2 | 2.86±0.06 a | 103.81±1.78 ab | 9.22±0.17 b | 0.65±0.01 a |
表5 平衡施肥对设施番茄外观性状的影响
Table 5 Effect of balanced fertilization on fruit appearance of tomato cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse
处理 Treatment | 果实硬度 Hardness/(kg·cm-2) | 单果鲜重 Single fruit fresh weight/g | 单果干重 Single fruit dry weight/g | 果形指数 Shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 1.72±0.09 c | 77.34±0.74 b | 6.07±0.24 c | 0.67±0.02 a |
CK | 2.17±0.15 b | 104.29±1.90 ab | 11.99±0.83 a | 0.67±0.01 a |
T1 | 2.94±0.07 a | 112.87±1.71 a | 12.17±0.86 a | 0.69±0.01 a |
T2 | 2.86±0.06 a | 103.81±1.78 ab | 9.22±0.17 b | 0.65±0.01 a |
图1 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄品质的影响 不同处理间没有相同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。
Fig.1 Effect of balanced fertilization on quality of tomato cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse The bars without the same lowercase letters showed the significant difference(P<0.05).
处理 Treatments | 磷P | 钾K | 铜Cu | 铁Fe | 锰Mn | 锌Zn | 钙Ca | 镁Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 108.88± 1.29 c | 18 148± 541 c | 2.67± 0.06 a | 24.31± 1.37 b | 1.11± 0.05 b | 18.79± 1.47 b | 114.45± 2.03 d | 1 293.60± 69.64 b |
CK | 127.34± 1.36 b | 31 552± 692 a | 2.14± 0.07 a | 28.60± 0.74 b | 2.58± 0.18 a | 22.37± 1.15 ab | 145.41± 8.24 c | 1 689.30± 27.91 b |
T1 | 144.41± 2.29 a | 31 020± 286 ab | 2.4± 0.07 a | 32.96± 0.84 a | 2.74± 0.17 a | 27.52± 3.94 a | 245.83± 19.22 a | 1 880.20± 36.32 a |
T2 | 119.21± 0.24 b | 29 608± 296 b | 2.19± 0.31 a | 32.50± 3.34 a | 2.43± 0.26 a | 21.91± 1.59 ab | 165.67± 20.16 b | 1 804.00± 64.99 ab |
表6 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄果实矿质元素的影响
Table 6 Effects of balanced fertilization on mineral elements of tomato cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse mg·g-1
处理 Treatments | 磷P | 钾K | 铜Cu | 铁Fe | 锰Mn | 锌Zn | 钙Ca | 镁Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 108.88± 1.29 c | 18 148± 541 c | 2.67± 0.06 a | 24.31± 1.37 b | 1.11± 0.05 b | 18.79± 1.47 b | 114.45± 2.03 d | 1 293.60± 69.64 b |
CK | 127.34± 1.36 b | 31 552± 692 a | 2.14± 0.07 a | 28.60± 0.74 b | 2.58± 0.18 a | 22.37± 1.15 ab | 145.41± 8.24 c | 1 689.30± 27.91 b |
T1 | 144.41± 2.29 a | 31 020± 286 ab | 2.4± 0.07 a | 32.96± 0.84 a | 2.74± 0.17 a | 27.52± 3.94 a | 245.83± 19.22 a | 1 880.20± 36.32 a |
T2 | 119.21± 0.24 b | 29 608± 296 b | 2.19± 0.31 a | 32.50± 3.34 a | 2.43± 0.26 a | 21.91± 1.59 ab | 165.67± 20.16 b | 1 804.00± 64.99 ab |
处理 Treatments | 产量 Yield/(kg·667m-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate/% | 产值 Output value/(yuan·667m-2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 2 666.96±382.74 b | — | — |
CK | 4 627.96±173.25 b | 42.37±0.2015 b | 13 883.88±615.14 b |
T1 | 5 333.92±102.14 a | 50.00±0.3637 a | 16 001.76±783.42 a |
T2 | 5 137.82±440.37 a | 48.09±0.2913 a | 15 413.46±849.36 b |
表7 平衡施肥对番茄产量的影响
Table 7 Effect of balanced fertilization on tomato yield
处理 Treatments | 产量 Yield/(kg·667m-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate/% | 产值 Output value/(yuan·667m-2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK0 | 2 666.96±382.74 b | — | — |
CK | 4 627.96±173.25 b | 42.37±0.2015 b | 13 883.88±615.14 b |
T1 | 5 333.92±102.14 a | 50.00±0.3637 a | 16 001.76±783.42 a |
T2 | 5 137.82±440.37 a | 48.09±0.2913 a | 15 413.46±849.36 b |
指标 Index | FWSF | TSS | SP | 硝酸盐 Nitrate | SS | TA | 产量 Yield | VC | 磷P | 钾K | 铜Cu | 铁Fe | 锰Mn | 锌Zn | 钙Ca |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSS | 0.888 | ||||||||||||||
SP | 0.21 | 0.449 | |||||||||||||
硝酸盐 | -0.963* | -0.954* | -0.453 | ||||||||||||
Nitrate | |||||||||||||||
SS | 0.904 | 0.989* | 0.315 | -0.937 | |||||||||||
TA | 0.999** | 0.902 | 0.197 | -0.963* | 0.921 | ||||||||||
产量Yield | 0.955* | -0.977* | -0.286 | 0.965* | -0.990** | -0.967* | |||||||||
VC | 0.915 | 0.841 | -0.089 | -0.830 | 0.906 | 0.931 | -0.929 | ||||||||
磷P | 0.946 | 0.920 | 0.515 | -0.993** | 0.890 | 0.94 | -0.927 | 0.767 | |||||||
钾K | 0.925 | 0.708 | -0.176 | -0.792 | 0.775 | 0.927 | -0.842 | 0.946 | 0.753 | ||||||
铜Cu | -0.899 | -0.714 | 0.232 | 0.762 | -0.792 | -0.907 | 0.845 | -0.970* | -0.71 | -0.992** | |||||
铁Fe | 0.884 | 0.899 | 0.014 | -0.842 | 0.953* | 0.907 | -0.952* | 0.982* | 0.772 | 0.871 | -0.907 | ||||
锰Mn | 0.952* | 0.712 | 0.110 | -0.870 | 0.731 | 0.938 | -0.819 | 0.814 | 0.877 | 0.924 | -0.87 | 0.732 | |||
锌Zn | 0.900 | 0.980* | 0.563 | -0.982* | 0.948 | 0.904 | -0.952* | 0.773 | 0.971* | 0.681 | -0.662 | 0.819 | 0.761 | ||
钙Ca | 0.854 | 0.993** | 0.549 | -0.948 | 0.966* | 0.866 | -0.950 | 0.774 | 0.924 | 0.636 | -0.636 | 0.844 | 0.675 | 0.988* | |
镁Mg | 0.918 | 0.775 | -0.164 | -0.803 | 0.847 | 0.929 | -0.889 | 0.989* | 0.748 | 0.982* | -0.995** | 0.943 | 0.862 | 0.719 | 0.702 |
表8 平衡施肥条件下设施基质栽培番茄果实品质、矿质元素含量与产量的相关性分析
Table 8 Correlation analysis of balanced fertilization on fruit quality, mineral content and yield of tomato cultivated in substrate in the greenhouse
指标 Index | FWSF | TSS | SP | 硝酸盐 Nitrate | SS | TA | 产量 Yield | VC | 磷P | 钾K | 铜Cu | 铁Fe | 锰Mn | 锌Zn | 钙Ca |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSS | 0.888 | ||||||||||||||
SP | 0.21 | 0.449 | |||||||||||||
硝酸盐 | -0.963* | -0.954* | -0.453 | ||||||||||||
Nitrate | |||||||||||||||
SS | 0.904 | 0.989* | 0.315 | -0.937 | |||||||||||
TA | 0.999** | 0.902 | 0.197 | -0.963* | 0.921 | ||||||||||
产量Yield | 0.955* | -0.977* | -0.286 | 0.965* | -0.990** | -0.967* | |||||||||
VC | 0.915 | 0.841 | -0.089 | -0.830 | 0.906 | 0.931 | -0.929 | ||||||||
磷P | 0.946 | 0.920 | 0.515 | -0.993** | 0.890 | 0.94 | -0.927 | 0.767 | |||||||
钾K | 0.925 | 0.708 | -0.176 | -0.792 | 0.775 | 0.927 | -0.842 | 0.946 | 0.753 | ||||||
铜Cu | -0.899 | -0.714 | 0.232 | 0.762 | -0.792 | -0.907 | 0.845 | -0.970* | -0.71 | -0.992** | |||||
铁Fe | 0.884 | 0.899 | 0.014 | -0.842 | 0.953* | 0.907 | -0.952* | 0.982* | 0.772 | 0.871 | -0.907 | ||||
锰Mn | 0.952* | 0.712 | 0.110 | -0.870 | 0.731 | 0.938 | -0.819 | 0.814 | 0.877 | 0.924 | -0.87 | 0.732 | |||
锌Zn | 0.900 | 0.980* | 0.563 | -0.982* | 0.948 | 0.904 | -0.952* | 0.773 | 0.971* | 0.681 | -0.662 | 0.819 | 0.761 | ||
钙Ca | 0.854 | 0.993** | 0.549 | -0.948 | 0.966* | 0.866 | -0.950 | 0.774 | 0.924 | 0.636 | -0.636 | 0.844 | 0.675 | 0.988* | |
镁Mg | 0.918 | 0.775 | -0.164 | -0.803 | 0.847 | 0.929 | -0.889 | 0.989* | 0.748 | 0.982* | -0.995** | 0.943 | 0.862 | 0.719 | 0.702 |
主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalues | 贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% |
---|---|---|---|
第一主成分 | 12.97 | 81.05 | 81.05 |
First principal component | |||
第二主成分 | 2.57 | 16.06 | 97.10 |
Second principal component | |||
第三主成分 | 0.46 | 2.90 | 100 |
Third principal component |
表9 番茄果实产量与品质指标主成分分析
Table 9 Principal component analysis of tomato fruit yield and quality indexes
主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalues | 贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% |
---|---|---|---|
第一主成分 | 12.97 | 81.05 | 81.05 |
First principal component | |||
第二主成分 | 2.57 | 16.06 | 97.10 |
Second principal component | |||
第三主成分 | 0.46 | 2.90 | 100 |
Third principal component |
图2 平衡施肥对设施基质栽培番茄果实生长和品质的主成分分析旋转空间散点图
Fig.2 Principal component analysis of growth and quality of tomato fruit by balanced fertilization under the condition of substrate culture
指标 Indexes | 第一主成分 First principal components | 第二主成分 Second principal components | 第三主成分 Third principal components |
---|---|---|---|
单果鲜重FWSF | 0.816 | 0.244 | 0.524 |
可溶性固形物SS | 0.697 | 0.594 | 0.338 |
可溶性蛋白SP | 0.416 | 0.901 | 0.037 |
硝酸盐Nitrate | 0.230 | 0.932 | -0.090 |
VC | 0.864 | 0.257 | 0.366 |
可溶性糖SS | 0.788 | 0.415 | 0.097 |
可滴定酸TA | -0.833 | -0.322 | -0.152 |
产量Yield | 0.579 | 0.094 | 0.759 |
磷P | 0.826 | 0.351 | 0.401 |
钾K | 0.945 | 0.317 | 0.061 |
铜Cu | -0.945 | -0.284 | -0.080 |
铁Fe | 0.951 | 0.307 | -0.026 |
锰Mn | 0.801 | 0.470 | 0.316 |
锌Zn | 0.912 | 0.334 | 0.227 |
钙Ca | 0.708 | 0.648 | 0.202 |
镁Mg | 0.005 | -0.061 | 0.997 |
表10 番茄果实品质及品质指标3个主成分载荷矩阵
Table 10 Principal component load matrix of growth and quality index of tomato fruit
指标 Indexes | 第一主成分 First principal components | 第二主成分 Second principal components | 第三主成分 Third principal components |
---|---|---|---|
单果鲜重FWSF | 0.816 | 0.244 | 0.524 |
可溶性固形物SS | 0.697 | 0.594 | 0.338 |
可溶性蛋白SP | 0.416 | 0.901 | 0.037 |
硝酸盐Nitrate | 0.230 | 0.932 | -0.090 |
VC | 0.864 | 0.257 | 0.366 |
可溶性糖SS | 0.788 | 0.415 | 0.097 |
可滴定酸TA | -0.833 | -0.322 | -0.152 |
产量Yield | 0.579 | 0.094 | 0.759 |
磷P | 0.826 | 0.351 | 0.401 |
钾K | 0.945 | 0.317 | 0.061 |
铜Cu | -0.945 | -0.284 | -0.080 |
铁Fe | 0.951 | 0.307 | -0.026 |
锰Mn | 0.801 | 0.470 | 0.316 |
锌Zn | 0.912 | 0.334 | 0.227 |
钙Ca | 0.708 | 0.648 | 0.202 |
镁Mg | 0.005 | -0.061 | 0.997 |
处理 Treatments | Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | -2.86 | -6.89 | -13.19 | -3.81 | 4 |
CK1 | -0.02 | 1.62 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 3 |
T1 | 2.96 | 3.48 | 10.86 | 3.28 | 1 |
T2 | -0.08 | 1.79 | 2.14 | 0.29 | 2 |
表11 各处理综合得分和排序
Table 11 Comprehensive score and ranking under different treatments
处理 Treatments | Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK0 | -2.86 | -6.89 | -13.19 | -3.81 | 4 |
CK1 | -0.02 | 1.62 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 3 |
T1 | 2.96 | 3.48 | 10.86 | 3.28 | 1 |
T2 | -0.08 | 1.79 | 2.14 | 0.29 | 2 |
[1] | 庄妍, 周维博, 李云排, 等. 基于经济社会发展水平的延安市水资源承载力分析及预测[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2014, 25(3): 199-203. |
ZHUANG Y, ZHOU W B, LI Y P, et al. Analysis and forecast of carrying capacity of water resources in Yan'an based on development level of economy and society[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2014, 25(3): 199-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 吴雪, 王坤元, 牛晓丽, 等. 番茄综合营养品质指标构建及其对水肥供应的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(7): 119-127. |
WU X, WANG K Y, NIU X L, et al. Construction of comprehensive nutritional quality index for tomato and its response to water and fertilizer supply[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(7): 119-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 赵玉红, 孙涛, 朱柯钰, 等. 陕北基质栽培樱桃番茄品种的筛选[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(10): 73-82. |
ZHAO Y H, SUN T, ZHU K Y, et al. Selection of cherry tomato cultivars suitable for substrate cultivation in northern Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(10): 73-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 李通, 武占会, 王宝驹, 等. 不同栽培基质对温室茭白幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(4): 99-104. |
LI T, WU Z H, WANG B J, et al. Effects of different culture media on growth and photosynthesis of Zizania aquatica seedlings in greenhouse[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2021, 34(4): 99-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 于静湜, 齐长红, 陈明远, 等. 日光温室草莓立体基质栽培模式分析[J]. 蔬菜, 2021(3): 65-68. |
YU J S, QI C H, CHEN M Y, et al. Analyse of stereoscopic substrate cultivation mode of strawberry in greenhouse[J]. Vegetables, 2021(3): 65-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] |
王启璋, 张广楠, 王丽慧, 等. 不同栽培方式对韭菜生长和碳水化合物累积的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 288-297.
DOI |
WANG Q Z, ZHANG G N, WANG L H, et al. Effects of different cultivation methods on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of Chinese chives[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 288-297. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 余朝阁, 吕亭辉, 解智慧, 等. 人工营养基质对黄瓜连作土壤酸化和酚类物质积累的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(6): 115-119. |
YU C G, LÜ T H, XIE Z H, et al. Effects of artificial nutrient substrate on acidification and accumulation of phenols in continuous cropping cucumber soil[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(6): 115-119. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 孙永生, 刘术均, 张逸鸣, 等. 基质栽培对番茄部分表型性状的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2020(3): 68-70. |
SUN Y S, LIU S J, ZHANG Y M, et al. Efects on some phenotpe characteristics of tomatos with substrate culture[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2020(3): 68-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 刘中良, 高昕, 张艳艳, 等. 基质栽培与土壤栽培番茄品质产量的比较研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(1): 124-127. |
LIU Z L, GAO Xin, ZHANG Yanyan, et al. Comparative study on quality and yield of tomato under substrate cultivation and soil cultivation[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(1): 124-127. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 胡玥, 崔雯, 金敏凤, 等. 不同栽培方式对生菜生长和营养品质的影响[J]. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 48(5): 566-573. |
HU Y, CUI W, JIN M F, et al. Effects of different cultivation methods on the growth and nutritional qualities of lettuce[J]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2019, 48(5): 566-573. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 刘任源, 严妍, 刘艺, 等. 温室草莓有机基质栽培技术[J]. 天津农林科技, 2019(2): 25-26, 28. |
LIU R Y, YAN Y, LIU Y, et al. Organic substrate cultivation techniques of strawberry in greenhouse[J]. Science and Technology of Tianjin Agriculture and Forestry, 2019(2): 25-26, 28. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 马乐乐, 高宁, 杨百良, 等. 全有机营养模式下番茄综合品质评价及其对有机肥水耦合的响应[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(6): 63-72. |
MA L L, GAO N, YANG B L, et al. Construction of integrated quality index of tomato with total organic nutrition and its response to organic fertilizer and water coupling[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(6): 63-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 杨俊刚, 张冬雷, 徐凯, 等. 控释肥与普通肥料混施对设施番茄生长和土壤硝态氮残留的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(18): 3782-3791. |
YANG J G, ZHANG D L, XU K, et al. Effects of mixed application of controlled-release fertilizer and common fertilizers on greenhouse tomato growth, yield, root distribution, and soil nitrate residual[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(18): 3782-3791. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] |
MIN J, ZHAO X, SHI W M, et al. Nitrogen balance and loss in a greenhouse vegetable system in southeastern China[J]. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(4): 464-472.
DOI URL |
[15] | 高峻岭, 宋朝玉, 李祥云, 等. 不同有机肥配比对蔬菜产量和品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008(1): 48-51. |
GAO J L, SONG C Y, LI X Y, et al. Effect of different combinations of organic manures on vegetables yield, quality and soil fertility[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2008(1): 48-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 蒋虹, 张健, 王景明, 等. 《植物生理学实验指导》(第5版)中的几个不足之处[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(1): 11-15. |
JIANG H, ZHANG J, WANG J M, et al. Some deficiencies in experimental guidance of plant physiology(5th edn)[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(1): 11-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[17] | JONES R L, SOMERVILLE C R, WALBOT V. Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology. vol. 49[M]. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc., 1998. |
[18] | 王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. |
[19] | 牛天航, 何志学, 颉建明, 等. 不同施肥处理对大棚越冬韭菜产量、品质及养分利用的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(7): 64-70. |
NIU T H, HE Z X, XIE J M, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on yield, quality and nutrient utilization of wintering Chinese chives in greenhouse[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2020, 33(7): 64-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 王庆玲, 朱代强, 王成, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对蒜苗生理特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2020, 55(4): 69-75, 84. |
WANG Q L, ZHU D Q, WANG C, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction and bio-organic fertilizer on photosynthesis, yield and quality of garlic seedlings[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2020, 55(4): 69-75, 84. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 刘金平, 孙菲菲, 王夏, 等. 减量施肥对番茄生长和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(8): 52-56. |
LIU J P, SUN F F, WANG X, et al. Effects of different fertilization on growth and quality of tomato[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021(8): 52-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 张秋英, 李发东, 刘孟雨. 冬小麦叶片叶绿素含量及光合速率变化规律的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 95-98. |
ZHANG Q Y, LI F D, LIU M Y. Changing laws of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate in winter wheat leaves[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 95-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 陈思, 韩丽君. 不同施肥处理对刺用皂荚苗木生长的影响[J]. 山西林业科技, 2021, 50(2): 18-21. |
CHEN S, HAN L J. Effects of different fertilization treatments on the growth of thorn-used Gleditsia sinensis[J]. Shanxi Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 50(2): 18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 杨建超, 陈有福, 付湘, 等. 不同氮肥用量对甜瓜生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 塔里木大学学报, 2021, 33(2): 79-85. |
YANG J C, CHEN Y F, FU X, et al. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of melon[J]. Journal of Tarim University, 2021, 33(2): 79-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 闻婧, 杨其长, 魏灵玲, 等. 不同红蓝LED组合光源对叶用莴苣光合特性和品质的影响及节能评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(4): 761-769. |
WEN J, YANG Q C, WEI L L, et al. Influence of combined lighting with different red and blue LED on photosynthetic characteristics and quality of lettuce and evaluation of energy consumption[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2011, 38(4): 761-769. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 杨琛. 浅谈光质对植物光合作用的调控及其机理[J]. 种子科技, 2017, 35(8): 120, 122. |
YANG C. The regulation and mechanism of light quality on plant photosynthesis[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2017, 35(8): 120, 122. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 陈超群, 付勇, 龚荣高, 等. 不同时期采用不同配比施肥对甜樱桃果实品质的影响[J]. 四川农业科技, 2021(7): 36-38, 43. |
CHEN C Q, FU Y, GONG R G, et al. Effects of different proportions of fertilization in different periods on fruit quality of sweet cherry[J]. Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(7): 36-38, 43. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 焦可君. 氮磷钾施肥水平对番茄养分积累及品质的影响[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2020. |
JIAO K J. Effects of N, P, K fertilization levels on nutrient accumulation and quality of tomato[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 陆文龙, 赵宏孺, 王德芳, 等. 矿质营养对白菜硝酸盐含量的影响[J]. 农业环境保护, 1999, 18(3): 23-25. |
LU W L, ZHAO H R, WANG D F, et al. The effect of mineral nutrients on nitrate content of Chinese cabbage[J]. Agro-Environmental Protection, 1999, 18(3): 23-25. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 佟容, 王国臣, 乔建磊, 等. 减氮施肥对菠菜生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(14): 59-64. |
TONG R, WANG G C, QIAO J L, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction and fertilization on growth, development and quality of spinach[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2021(14): 59-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 张新建, 宁晓光, 郑桂亮, 等. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤肥力及番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(14): 59-63. |
ZHANG X J, NING X G, ZHENG G L, et al. Replacing chemical fertilizer with organic manure: effects on soil fertility and tomato yield and quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(14): 59-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] |
齐振宇, 蔡溧聪, 胡卫珍, 等. 水肥一体化模式中化肥减施与不同基追肥比例对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415.
DOI |
QI Z Y, CAI L C, HU W Z, et al. Effects of reduced application of chemical fertilizers and ratio of base and topdressing fertilizers on yield and quality of garlic in integrated mode of water and fertilizer[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(8): 1409-1415. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 褚屿, 骆洪义, 林举梅, 等. 番茄对氮磷钾及中微量元素的吸收规律研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(1): 247-255. |
CHU Y, LUO H Y, LIN J M, et al. Study on the absorption law of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and trace elements of tomatoes[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(1): 247-255. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 李杰, 贾豪语, 颉建明, 等. 生物肥部分替代化肥对花椰菜产量、品质、光合特性及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1): 47-55. |
LI J, JIA H Y, XIE J M, et al. Effects of partial substitution of mineral fertilizer by bio-fertilizer on yield, quality, photosynthesis and fertilizer utilization rate in broccoli[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(1): 47-55. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 王世明. 生物有机肥配施化肥改善苹果品质[J]. 中国果业信息, 2020, 37(9): 58. |
WANG S M. The quality of apple was improved by applying biological organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer[J]. China Fruit News, 2020, 37(9): 58. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | 任婷婷, 李天卫, 张永峰, 等. 三种有机肥对烤烟生长发育及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2020, 66(9): 54-59. |
REN T T, LI T W, ZHANG Y F, et al. Effects of three organic fertilizers on cured tobacco growth, development and yield[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 66(9): 54-59. (in Chinese) | |
[37] | CHOUDHARY M, MEENA V S, PANDAY S C, et al. Long-term effects of organic manure and inorganic fertilization on biological soil quality indicators of soybean-wheat rotation in the Indian mid-Himalaya[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 157: 103754. |
[38] | KHEROAR S, PATRA B, HALDER D, et al. Comparative efficacy of inorganic and bio-fertilizers on growth and yield of rainfed winter rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2018, 26(2): 1-13. |
[39] | 李晨曦, 周婷, 王川, 等. 炭基有机肥对烤烟生长及产量与质量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(21): 14-16. |
LI C X, ZHOU T, WANG C, et al. Effect of carbon based organic fertilizer on growth and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(21): 14-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 高怀军, 陈良兴, 蒋光月. 不同施肥方式对蓝莓产量及效益的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(21): 97-99, 104. |
GAO H J, CHEN L X, JIANG G Y. Effects of different fertilization methods on yield and benefit of blueberry[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(21): 97-99, 104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 周芳, 曹国璠, 李金玲, 等. 不同有机肥种类及用量对连作白术产量与品质的影响[J]. 中药材, 2020, 43(10): 2350-2356. |
ZHOU F, CAO G F, LI J L, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers and dosages on the yield and quality of continuous cropping Atractylodes macrocephala[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2020, 43(10): 2350-2356. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | 马忠明, 陈娟, 牛小霞, 等. 减施化肥和配施有机肥对酿酒葡萄梅鹿辄产量和品质的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(2): 188-193, 200. |
MA Z M, CHEN J, NIU X X, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction and chemical fertilizer applied with organic fertilizer on yield and quality of Vitis vinifera merlot[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 188-193, 200. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[43] | 王家宝, 孙义祥, 李虹颖, 等. 生物有机肥用量及部分替代化肥对小麦产量效应的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(36): 6-11. |
WANG J B, SUN Y X, LI H Y, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer and partial substitution of chemical fertilizer on wheat yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(36): 6-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王峰, 刘海天, 俞巧钢, 叶静, 何新华, 周杨, 马军伟. 高产和常规黄花菜品种的干物质和养分积累特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1669-1678. |
[2] | 邹振浩, 孙业良, 赵玉宝, 李鑫, 张丽平, 张兰, 董春旺, 付建玉, 韩文炎, 颜鹏. 采摘花芽对春茶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376. |
[3] | 杨肖芳, 李云端, 孙云帆, 李绍佳, 苗立祥, 张豫超, 蒋桂华. 基质栽培与土壤栽培对越心草莓蔗糖和柠檬酸积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1423-1430. |
[4] | 朱诗君, 金树权, 姚红燕, 徐志豪, 罗幼君, 陈若霞. 不同基肥及追肥配比对凤梨生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1217-1226. |
[5] | 朱铭, 刘琛, 林义成, 郭彬, 李华, 傅庆林. 不同调理剂组合对浙江红壤土壤肥力、微生物群落多样性和水稻产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1258-1267. |
[6] | 王晓丽, 赵英伟, 孔晓娜, 曹子林. 蓝桉根际菌根真菌的分离鉴定及其对蓝桉生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1015-1023. |
[7] | 叶迎, 赵考诚, 马军, 祝轲, 庄恒扬. 播期和施氮量组合对水稻南粳9108产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 879-886. |
[8] | 安雅雯, 杨晓东, 高智雄, 郭绍乾, 高爱武, 杨金丽, 王海荣. 高精饲粮中添加苦豆子对羔羊生长与血液生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 908-914. |
[9] | 胡开博, 杨清夏, 李扬, 吴开贤, 赵平, 龙光强. 化肥减氮配施氨基酸肥料对春玉米生产的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 661-670. |
[10] | 李景上, 章啸君, 陈胜昌, 蒋锦华, 项云, 屠平光, 楼芳芳, 杨华, 肖英平. 金华猪肌肉和血清氨基酸谱的发育性变化及其与肌肉生长的相关性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 687-694. |
[11] | 王慧茹, 李建设, 闫思华, 高艳明. 整枝方式对樱桃番茄冠层截获和荧光特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 525-533. |
[12] | 袁文雅, 康益晨, 杨昕宇, 张茹艳, 周春涛, 王勇, 陈喜鹏, 余慧芳, 秦舒浩. 清水苜蓿土壤浸提液对连作马铃薯根际土壤环境酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 240-247. |
[13] | 吴涛, 魏玉明, 江小帆, 黄杰, 杨发荣, 陈国顺, 蔡原, 焦婷, 赵生国. 日粮中添加藜麦对芦花鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、器官指数与肠道形态的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 255-265. |
[14] | 裴芸, 徐秀红, 陆锦彪, 陈阿敏, 张万萍. 151份贵州地方樱桃番茄资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 310-316. |
[15] | 龚伟杰, 刘洪, 黄萍, 王慧, 周倩. 番茄匍柄霉原生质体的制备与再生体系构建[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 337-342. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||