十二个茶树品种对茶棍蓟马、茶小绿叶蝉抗性表现及抗性成分初步鉴定

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.15

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1713-1724.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.15

十二个茶树品种对茶棍蓟马、茶小绿叶蝉抗性表现及抗性成分初步鉴定

杨春(), 孟泽洪, 李帅, 梁思慧, 乔大河, 陈正武^*()

贵州省农业科学院茶叶研究所,贵州贵阳 550006

收稿日期:2021-03-01 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-26
通讯作者: 陈正武
作者简介:*陈正武,E-mail: zwchentea@163.com
杨春(1988—),女,湖南益阳人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事茶树资源育种研究。E-mail: 610681998@qq.com
基金资助:
贵州省科技计划(黔科合基础〔2020〕1Y119);贵州省科技计划(黔科合成果〔2018〕4317);贵州省农业科学院青年基金(黔农科院青年基金〔2018〕16号);国家自然科学基金(31560515)

Resistance of 12 tea cultivars to Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Empoasca Onukii Matsuda and a preliminary identification of resistant components

YANG Chun(), MENG Zehong, LI Shuai, LIANG Sihui, QIAO Dahe, CHEN Zhengwu^*()

Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China

Received:2021-03-01 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-26
Contact: CHEN Zhengwu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明确贵州主栽茶树品种对茶棍蓟马(Dendrothrips minowai Priesner)、茶小绿叶蝉(Empoasca onukii Matsuda)的抗性表现及相关抗性生化因子,利用为期1年的田间调查明确12个茶树品种抗性表现,采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)检测茶树中的咖啡碱、氨基酸组分、儿茶素组分等27种生化成分,用相关性分析判断生化含量与品种抗性间的关系。结果表明:12个茶树品种中,乌牛早、金观音和中茶108为茶棍蓟马高感品种,苔选0310和黔辐4号为茶棍蓟马高抗品种;福鼎大白茶为茶小绿叶蝉高感品种,黔湄601为茶小绿叶蝉高抗品种。咖啡碱含量与茶棍蓟马发生量呈显著负相关,大部分氨基酸含量与茶棍蓟马及茶小绿叶蝉发生量呈正相关,其中精氨酸含量与茶小绿叶蝉发生量呈显著正相关。除表没食子儿茶素外的5个儿茶素单体含量与茶棍蓟马及茶小绿叶蝉发生量呈负相关,其中儿茶素含量与茶小绿叶蝉发生量呈显著负相关。

关键词: 茶棍蓟马, 茶小绿叶蝉, 茶树, 抗性

Abstract:

This article aims to ascertain the resistance of 12 tea cultivars to Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Empoasca Onukii Matsuda, and to clarify the related resistance biochemical components. Through a one-year field survey, the resistance performance of 12 tea cultivars to D. minowai and E. onukii were confirmed. HPLC was used to analyze caffeine, amino acids, catechin components and the resistance biochemical components were also defined through correlation analysis. Results showed, Wuniuzao, Jinguanyin, Zhongcha 108 were more susceptible to D. minowai. In contrast, Taixuan 0310 and Qianfu 4 possessed higher resistance. Fuding Dabaicha was more susceptible to E. onukii. In contrast, Qianmei 601 possessed higher resistance. The occurrence quantity of D. minowai was negatively significant correlated with caffeine content. Most amino acids contribute to the susceptibility of E. onukii. Arginine was positively significant correlated to the occurrence quantity of E. onukii. Except epigallocatechin, the other 5 catechin monomers contribute to the resistance of E. onukii. The content of (+)-catechin was negatively significant correlated to the occurrence quantity of E. onukii.

Key words: Dendrothrips minowai Priesner, Empoasca onukii Matsuda, tea, resistance

中图分类号:

S435.711

杨春, 孟泽洪, 李帅, 梁思慧, 乔大河, 陈正武. 十二个茶树品种对茶棍蓟马、茶小绿叶蝉抗性表现及抗性成分初步鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1713-1724.

YANG Chun, MENG Zehong, LI Shuai, LIANG Sihui, QIAO Dahe, CHEN Zhengwu. Resistance of 12 tea cultivars to Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Empoasca Onukii Matsuda and a preliminary identification of resistant components[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1713-1724.

图/表 7

参考文献 52

[1]	IDRIS A L, FAN X, MUHAMMAD M H, et al. Ecologically controlling insect and mite pests of tea plants with microbial pesticides: a review[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2020, 202(6): 1275-1284. DOI URL
[2]	LEE S H, LIN S R, CHEN S F. Identification of tea foliar diseases and pest damage under practical field conditions using a convolutional neural network[J]. Plant Pathology, 2020, 69(9): 1731-1739. DOI URL
[3]	于晓飞, 孟泽洪, 杨茂发, 等. 贵州及南方其他部分省区茶树小绿叶蝉种类调查与考订[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2015, 52(5): 1277-1287.
	YU X F, MENG Z H, YANG M F, et al. Investigation and taxonomic revision of green tea leafhopper species of Guizhou and other provinces in South China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2015, 52(5): 1277-1287. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	LI X Y, QI P Y, ZHANG Q P, et al. Introduction of two predators to control Dendrothrips minowai (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in tea (Camellia sinensis) plantations in China[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2020, 30(5): 431-441. DOI URL
[5]	罗林丽, 孟泽洪, 李帅, 等. 基于mtDNA CO Ⅰ和mtDNA CO Ⅱ分子标记的贵州省茶棍蓟马种群遗传多样性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(7): 1684-1692.
	LUO L L, MENG Z H, LI S, et al. Genetic diversity among populations of Dendrothrips minowai Priesner in Guizhou based on mtDNA CO Ⅰ and mtDNA CO Ⅱ molecular markers[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2020, 51(7): 1684-1692. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	孟泽洪, 李帅, 杨文, 等. 锉吸有痕的茶棍蓟马[J]. 中国茶叶, 2019, 41(12): 20-22.
	MENG Z H, LI S, YANG W, et al. Dendrothrips minowai Priesner with suction marks[J]. China Tea, 2019, 41(12): 20-22. (in Chinese)
[7]	肖强. “张冠李戴”话茶小绿叶蝉[J]. 中国茶叶, 2019, 41(5): 14-16.
	XIAO Q. Talk about Empoasca onukii(Matsuda)[J]. China Tea, 2019, 41(5): 14-16. (in Chinese)
[8]	王瑶, 慕卫, 张丽霞, 等. 杀虫剂对茶园3种常见刺吸式口器害虫的室内毒力评价[J]. 茶叶科学, 2017, 37(4): 392-398.
	WANG Y, MU W, ZHANG L X, et al. Toxicity assessment of insecticides to three common piercing-sucking insects in tea plantations[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2017, 37(4): 392-398. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	董照锋, 张小平. 5种杀虫剂对茶棍蓟马、茶黄蓟马田间防效[J]. 东北农业科学, 2018, 43(5): 38-40.
	DONG Z F, ZHANG X P. Field control effect of 5 pesticides on Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 43(5): 38-40. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	张正伟, 王轶. 醚菊酯等3种药剂防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉的药效试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(3): 445-446.
	ZHANG Z W, WANG Y. Control effects of three fungicides including ethofenprox on Empoasca vitis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(3): 445-446. (in Chinese)
[11]	SCOTT E R, LI X, WEI J P, et al. Changes in tea plant secondary metabolite profiles as a function of leafhopper density and damage[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 636. DOI URL
[12]	LI P H, XU Y J, ZHANG Y R, et al. Metabolite profiling and transcriptome analysis revealed the chemical contributions of tea trichomes to tea flavors and tea plant defenses[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020, 68(41): 11389-11401. DOI URL
[13]	许宁, 陈雪芬, 陈华才, 等. 茶树品种抗茶橙瘿螨的形态与生化特征[J]. 茶叶科学, 1996, 16(2): 125-130.
	XU N, CHEN X F, CHEN H C, et al. Morphological and biochemical parameters of tea varieties resistante to pink mite (Acaphylla theae Watt)[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 1996, 16(2): 125-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	刘奕清, 徐泽, 周正科, 等. 茶树品种抗侧多食跗线螨的形态和生化特征[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1999, 17(2): 187-191.
	LIU Y Q, XU Z, ZHOU Z K, et al. Morphological and biochemical parameters of tea varieties resistance to Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1999, 17(2): 187-191. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	陈常颂, 王庆森, 黄建, 等. 茶树品种新梢主要生化成分与黑刺粉虱选择性的关系[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 36(6): 576-580.
	CHEN C S, WANG Q S, HUANG J, et al. Correlation between main biochemical components in new shoots of tea varieties and the selectivity of Aleurocanthus spiniferus(Quaintance)[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 36(6): 576-580. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	葛超美, 张家侠, 孙钦玉, 等. 灰茶尺蠖对不同茶树品种取食选择与适应性及与茶树叶片营养成分的关系[J]. 昆虫学报, 2018, 61(11): 1300-1309.
	GE C M, ZHANG J X, SUN Q Y, et al. Feeding preference and adaptation of Ectropis grisescens(Lepidoptera: Geometridae) to different tea cultivars and their relationship with nutritional components in leaves of tea plants[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2018, 61(11): 1300-1309. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	钟明跃. 不同茶树品种对茶蚜的抗性研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2018.
	ZHONG M Y. Study on the resistance of different tea varieties to Toxoptera aurantii Boyer[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	杨春, 李帅, 陈正武, 等. 茶树特征性生化成分与绿盲蝽的互作影响[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 32(3): 431-436.
	YANG C, LI S, CHEN Z W, et al. Interaction effects between characteristic biochemical components of tea plants and Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-dür)[J]. Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 32(3): 431-436. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	毛迎新, 邹武, 马新华, 等. 福建主要茶树品种间假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态及其抗虫性比较[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2009, 28(1): 16-19.
	MAO Y X, ZOU W, MA X H, et al. Comparison of the population dynamics of Empoasca vitis (Göthe) on six tea varieties and their resistance to pests[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009, 28(1): 16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	金珊, 孙晓玲, 张新忠, 等. 8个茶树品种生化成分分析及抗性成分的初步鉴定[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2016, 53(3): 516-527.
	JIN S, SUN X L, ZHANG X Z, et al. Chemical analysis of 8 tea cultivars with different levels of resistance to Empoasca vitis Göthe and a preliminary identification of the chemical basis of this resistance[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2016, 53(3): 516-527. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	郑雨婷, 王梦馨, 崔林, 等. 基于EPG技术分析茶树品种对茶小绿叶蝉的抗性及其相关的抗性物质[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(23): 8015-8028.
	ZHENG Y T, WANG M X, CUI L, et al. Resistance of tea cultivars to the tea green leafhopper analyzed by EPG technique and their resistance-related substances[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(23): 8015-8028. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	SUN Q Y, CHEN W L, GE C M, et al. Correlation of tea green leafhopper occurrence with leaf structure and biochemical components in different tea cultivars[J]. International Journal of Pest Management, 2020: 1-11.
[23]	吕召云, 郅军锐, 周玉锋, 等. 茶棍蓟马(Dendrothrips minowai Priesner)触角感器的扫描电镜观察[J]. 茶叶科学, 2015, 35(2): 185-195.
	LYU Z Y, ZHI J R, ZHOU Y F, et al. Scanning electron microscopic observations of antennal sensilla of tea stick thrips(Dendrothrips minowai Priesner)[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2015, 35(2): 185-195. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	LYU Z Y, ZHI J R, ZHOU Y F, et al. Genetic diversity and origin of Dendrothrips minowai (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Guizhou, China[J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2016, 19(4): 1035-1042. DOI URL
[25]	刘惠芳, 杨文, 陈瑶, 等. 4种杀虫剂对茶棍蓟马的防效及其在茶树上的残留动态[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(12): 48-51.
	LIU H F, YANG W, CHEN Y, et al. Control effect of four pesticides against Dendrothrips minowai and their residual dynamics in tea[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(12): 48-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	CHEN S C, JIANG H Y, PENG P, et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of the stick tea thrips Dendrothrips minowai(Thysanoptera: Thripidae)[J]. Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 2018, 3(1): 58-59. DOI URL
[27]	张莉, 杨春, 李帅, 等. 贵州中部地区茶园茶棍蓟马的空间分布[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(12): 52-54.
	ZHANG L, YANG C, LI S, et al. Spatial distribution pattern of Dendrothrips minowai in tea garden in central Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(12): 52-54. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	曾贞, 罗军武, 杨阳, 等. 微波固样方法研究与应用[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2007, 34(1): 4-6.
	ZENG Z, LUO J W, YANG Y, et al. Study and application of the microwave technique to tea sample[J]. Tea Communication, 2007, 34(1): 4-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	周顺珍, 龚雪, 周国兰, 等. HPLC法测定茶叶中儿茶素及咖啡碱[J]. 化学分析计量, 2013, 22(5): 27-29.
	ZHOU S Z, GONG X, ZHOU G L, et al. Determination of catechins and caffeine in tea by HPLC[J]. Chemical Analysis and Meterage, 2013, 22(5): 27-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	岳婕. 高茶氨酸茶树品种筛选及栽培技术研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2010.
	YUE J. Studies on the selection of tea species with high theanine and the caltivation technology[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	李江含, 雷鑫, 杨婷, 等. PITC柱前衍生HPLC测定乌梅17种氨基酸的含量[J]. 中药材, 2019, 42(6): 1334-1338.
	LI J H, LEI X, YANG T, et al. Determination of 17 amino acids in Fructus mume by HPLC with PITC precolumn derivatization[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2019, 42(6): 1334-1338. (in Chinese)
[32]	顾念念, 索亚然, 乔艺涵, 等. 柱前衍生-HPLC法对水蛭的指纹图谱及其16种氨基酸含量测定研究[J]. 环球中医药, 2020, 13(4): 592-599.
	GU N N, SUO Y R, QIAO Y H, et al. Study on finger print and 16 amino acids's content determination of Hirudo by pre-column derivatization-high performance liquid chromatography method[J]. Global Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020, 13(4): 592-599. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	禹田, 贾永超, 柴正群, 等. 玉米品种抗蚜性鉴定评价方法与标准研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(6): 1396-1403.
	YU T, JIA Y C, CHAI Z Q, et al. Study on the methodology and criterion for evaluating corn resistance to Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(6): 1396-1403. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	张中润, 高燕, 黄建峰, 等. 不同芒果品种对蓟马的抗虫性评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(7): 1591-1597.
	ZHANG Z R, GAO Y, HUANG J F, et al. Evaluation on the resistance of different mango varieties to thrips[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2020, 51(7): 1591-1597. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	陈强, 张金龙, 雷帅, 等. 不同玉米新品种田间抗蚜性比较[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(5): 162-168.
	CHEN Q, ZHANG J L, LEI S, et al. Comparison of aphid resistance of different common maize varieties in field[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(5): 162-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	谢小群, 贺望兴, 石旭平, 等. 小贯小绿叶蝉发生规律与预测预报研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 87-91.
	XIE X Q, HE W X, SHI X P, et al. Studies on occurrence characteristics of Empoasca(Matsumurasca) onukii and its regression forecasting[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2020, 32(3): 87-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	余金咏, 周印富, 林小虎, 等. 冀东地区不同玉米品种蓟马发生种类和种群动态[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(4): 31-34.
	YU J Y, ZHOU Y F, LIN X H, et al. The species and population dynamics of thrips on different maize varieties in Eastern Hebei Province[J]. China Plant Protection, 2020, 40(4): 31-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	LI J, YAO Y, WANG J, et al. Rutin, γ-aminobutyric acid, Gallic acid, and caffeine negatively affect the sweet-mellow taste of congou black tea infusions[J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(23): 4221. DOI URL
[39]	ZHOU X C, ZENG L T, CHEN Y J, et al. Metabolism of gallic acid and its distributions in tea (Camellia sinensis) plants at the tissue and subcellular levels[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(16): 5684. DOI URL
[40]	VAN DEN BERG B, DE JONG M, WOLDORFF M G, et al. Caffeine boosts preparatory attention for reward-related stimulus information[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2021, 33(1): 104-118. DOI URL
[41]	NAWROT P, JORDAN S, EASTWOOD J, et al. Effects of caffeine on human health[J]. Food Additives & Contaminants, 2003, 20(1): 1-30.
[42]	MEI C, YANG J, YAN P, et al. Full-length transcriptome and targeted metabolome analyses provide insights into defense mechanisms of Malus sieversii against Agrilus mali[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8: e8992. DOI URL
[43]	HOLLINGSWORTH R G, ARMSTRONG J W, CAMPBELL E. Caffeine as a repellent for slugs and snails[J]. Nature, 2002, 417(6892): 915-916. DOI URL
[44]	ZHOU D S, LONG J M, LIU J H, et al. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to caffeine of Helicoverpa armigera larvae and H. assulta larvae[J]. Agricultural Biotechnology, 2018, 7(5):127-129.
[45]	KHOSHRAFTAR Z, SHAMEL A, SAFEKORDI A A, et al. Chemical composition of an insecticidal hydroalcoholic extract from tea leaves against green peach aphid[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16(11): 7583-7590. DOI URL
[46]	张英娜, 嵇伟彬, 许勇泉, 等. 儿茶素呈味特性及其感官分析方法研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2017, 37(1): 1-9.
	ZHANG Y N, JI W B, XU Y Q, et al. Review on taste characteristic of catechins and its sensory analysis method[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2017, 37(1): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47]	于丹, 付明磊, 王娟, 等. EGCG对卵巢癌移植瘤生长及对VEGF和PCNA的影响[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2021, 37(1): 114-118.
	YU D, FU M L, WANG J, et al. Effects of EGCG on growth and expression of VEGF and PCNA in ovarian cancer xenografts of nude mice[J]. Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 114-118. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[48]	刘丽芳. 茶树不同品种和次生代谢物质对叶蝉取食行为影响的DC-EPG研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
	LIU L F. Studies on effect of various cultivars and secondary metabolites of tea plants to tea green leafhopper feeding by DC-EPG[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[49]	LONG Y H, ZHANG Y, ZHAO T, et al. Positive effects of the tea catechin, (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, on gut prophenoloxidase and the survival of Ectropis obliqua(Lepidoptera: Geometridae)[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2019, 48(5): 1173-1177. DOI URL
[50]	YOROZUYA H, OGINO A. The volumes and amino acid compositions of honeydew excreted by tea green leafhoppers, Empoasca onukii Matsuda feeding on tea germplasm accesions[J]. Japanese Journal of Entomology, 2014(17): 23-31.
[51]	张辉, 李慧玲, 李良德, 等. 茶树被茶跗线螨取食后重要生理生化指标的变化趋势分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(3): 632-639.
	ZHANG H, LI H L, LI L D, et al. Main physiological variation in tea leaves fed by broad mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus(Banks)[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2018, 45(3): 632-639. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[52]	任倩倩, 庄明珠, 蔡晓明, 等. 小贯小绿叶蝉取食诱导抗、感茶树品种挥发物的释放[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(6): 795-806.
	REN Q Q, ZHUANG M Z, CAI X M, et al. The release of volatiles in resistant and susceptible tea cultivars under Empoasca onukii feeding[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(6): 795-806. (in Chinese with English abstract)

调查时间 Sampling date	茶棍蓟马(DP)和茶小绿叶蝉(EM)虫口量/(头·50梢^-1) The number of D. minowai (DP) and E. onukii (EM) per 50 shoots
	TX0310	HJY	BJHJC	BY1	QM601	ZC108	FD	QC8	WNZ	QF4	QC1	JGY
	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM
2019-01-24	5/0	27/0	18/0	62/0	22/0	67/0	18/0	125/0	45/0	0/0	76/0	28/0
2019-04-01	0/0	7/2	0/2	2/0	0/0	45/4	0/0	0/0	3/0	0/0	11/1	0/0
2019-04-22	5/0	12/0	3/0	15/0	31/0	226/0	4/0	147/2	47/0	57/0	109/4	188/0
2019-05-08	34/0	183/0	119/3	169/0	65/0	319/0	50/1	333/0	468/0	45/0	287/0	252/0
2019-05-13	47/1	215/1	157/8	191/2	152/3	1 420/0	76/0	411/2	2 298/1	28/0	365/1	1 004/0
2019-05-20	356/5	1 819/23	815/12	1 084/3	1 498/7	4 344/6	541/1	2 249/3	2 865/7	79/6	3 116/16	3 466/16
2019-05-28	725/7	1 598/12	1 067/4	540/7	1 330/6	4 056/8	1 000/5	3 778/5	4 618/10	488/6	3 210/11	3 936/9
2019-06-04	682/3	858/5	1 276/15	786/6	1 072/2	1 748/6	1 080/2	1 962/2	1 900/3	656/5	1 072/6	1 184/9
2019-07-15	18/9	23/19	108/24	68/18	13/21	6/12	43/18	23/12	39/13	51/22	8/18	11/6
2019-07-22	4/15	18/21	36/32	59/33	13/22	7/14	14/27	4/11	4/45	26/26	10/29	3/24
2019-07-30	2/10	3/10	18/34	34/16	8/2	1/31	4/36	7/11	12/25	8/6	1/18	2/41
2019-08-06	6/3	10/3	12/23	89/12	8/1	16/7	8/7	7/2	37/14	3/18	7/1	14/24
2019-08-16	19/1	25/7	33/9	192/11	5/0	1/4	19/2	21/6	66/4	2/18	10/8	12/23
2019-08-27	90/3	226/2	152/2	683/1	35/1	12/2	118/0	234/0	71/2	58/4	77/1	63/1
2019-09-04	60/0	150/0	105/1	361/1	30/1	16/0	97/0	179/2	23/3	51/1	103/0	36/3
2019-09-13	51/3	358/6	143/4	771/11	83/3	16/2	308/2	257/9	28/8	41/4	246/6	66/6
2019-09-26	171/11	597/3	391/15	968/27	271/2	36/13	894/15	611/36	95/10	36/10	317/20	412/15
2019-10-07	82/10	348/12	160/30	516/12	173/3	56/15	462/22	320/27	37/11	67/12	171/40	345/25
2019-10-19	67/26	55/3	118/18	62/12	47/3	30/12	233/60	134/49	28/13	68/28	112/30	275/39
2019-10-31	27/15	29/7	33/24	11/9	7/2	22/5	111/73	71/25	20/14	34/14	28/21	95/34
2019-11-17	10/25	73/7	138/44	11/7	0/0	32/11	118/50	49/11	47/28	45/7	97/51	80/25
2019-12-07	0/0	12/0	2/1	2/0	0/0	7/3	8/3	5/2	3/0	0/0	7/3	6/2

调查时间 Sampling date	茶棍蓟马(DP)和茶小绿叶蝉(EM)虫口量/(头·50梢^-1) The number of D. minowai (DP) and E. onukii (EM) per 50 shoots
	TX0310	HJY	BJHJC	BY1	QM601	ZC108	FD	QC8	WNZ	QF4	QC1	JGY
	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM	DP/EM
2019-01-24	5/0	27/0	18/0	62/0	22/0	67/0	18/0	125/0	45/0	0/0	76/0	28/0
2019-04-01	0/0	7/2	0/2	2/0	0/0	45/4	0/0	0/0	3/0	0/0	11/1	0/0
2019-04-22	5/0	12/0	3/0	15/0	31/0	226/0	4/0	147/2	47/0	57/0	109/4	188/0
2019-05-08	34/0	183/0	119/3	169/0	65/0	319/0	50/1	333/0	468/0	45/0	287/0	252/0
2019-05-13	47/1	215/1	157/8	191/2	152/3	1 420/0	76/0	411/2	2 298/1	28/0	365/1	1 004/0
2019-05-20	356/5	1 819/23	815/12	1 084/3	1 498/7	4 344/6	541/1	2 249/3	2 865/7	79/6	3 116/16	3 466/16
2019-05-28	725/7	1 598/12	1 067/4	540/7	1 330/6	4 056/8	1 000/5	3 778/5	4 618/10	488/6	3 210/11	3 936/9
2019-06-04	682/3	858/5	1 276/15	786/6	1 072/2	1 748/6	1 080/2	1 962/2	1 900/3	656/5	1 072/6	1 184/9
2019-07-15	18/9	23/19	108/24	68/18	13/21	6/12	43/18	23/12	39/13	51/22	8/18	11/6
2019-07-22	4/15	18/21	36/32	59/33	13/22	7/14	14/27	4/11	4/45	26/26	10/29	3/24
2019-07-30	2/10	3/10	18/34	34/16	8/2	1/31	4/36	7/11	12/25	8/6	1/18	2/41
2019-08-06	6/3	10/3	12/23	89/12	8/1	16/7	8/7	7/2	37/14	3/18	7/1	14/24
2019-08-16	19/1	25/7	33/9	192/11	5/0	1/4	19/2	21/6	66/4	2/18	10/8	12/23
2019-08-27	90/3	226/2	152/2	683/1	35/1	12/2	118/0	234/0	71/2	58/4	77/1	63/1
2019-09-04	60/0	150/0	105/1	361/1	30/1	16/0	97/0	179/2	23/3	51/1	103/0	36/3
2019-09-13	51/3	358/6	143/4	771/11	83/3	16/2	308/2	257/9	28/8	41/4	246/6	66/6
2019-09-26	171/11	597/3	391/15	968/27	271/2	36/13	894/15	611/36	95/10	36/10	317/20	412/15
2019-10-07	82/10	348/12	160/30	516/12	173/3	56/15	462/22	320/27	37/11	67/12	171/40	345/25
2019-10-19	67/26	55/3	118/18	62/12	47/3	30/12	233/60	134/49	28/13	68/28	112/30	275/39
2019-10-31	27/15	29/7	33/24	11/9	7/2	22/5	111/73	71/25	20/14	34/14	28/21	95/34
2019-11-17	10/25	73/7	138/44	11/7	0/0	32/11	118/50	49/11	47/28	45/7	97/51	80/25
2019-12-07	0/0	12/0	2/1	2/0	0/0	7/3	8/3	5/2	3/0	0/0	7/3	6/2

茶树品种 Tea varieties	全年发生量/(头·50梢^-1) Occurrence quantity in whole year (pest per 50 shoots)		全年虫量比值 Pest number ratio in whole year		全年抗性等级 Resistance classification in whole year
茶树品种 Tea varieties	DP	EM	DP	EM	DP	EM
苔选0310 TX0310	2 461	147	0.329	0.694	HR	R
黄金芽HJY	6 646	143	0.889	0.675	MR	R
保靖黄金茶BJHJC	4 904	305	0.656	1.440	R	S
白叶1号BY1	6 676	188	0.893	0.887	MR	MR
黔湄601 QM601	4 863	79	0.651	0.373	R	HR
中茶108ZC108	12 483	155	1.670	0.732	HS	R
福鼎大白茶FD	5 206	324	0.697	1.530	R	HS
黔茶8号QC8	10 927	217	1.462	1.024	S	MR
乌牛早WNZ	12 754	211	1.707	0.996	HS	MR
黔辐4号QF4	1 843	187	0.247	0.883	HR	MR
黔茶1号QC1	9 440	285	1.263	1.345	S	S
金观音JGY	11 478	301	1.536	1.421	HS	S

茶树品种 Tea varieties	全年发生量/(头·50梢^-1) Occurrence quantity in whole year (pest per 50 shoots)		全年虫量比值 Pest number ratio in whole year		全年抗性等级 Resistance classification in whole year
茶树品种 Tea varieties	DP	EM	DP	EM	DP	EM
苔选0310 TX0310	2 461	147	0.329	0.694	HR	R
黄金芽HJY	6 646	143	0.889	0.675	MR	R
保靖黄金茶BJHJC	4 904	305	0.656	1.440	R	S
白叶1号BY1	6 676	188	0.893	0.887	MR	MR
黔湄601 QM601	4 863	79	0.651	0.373	R	HR
中茶108ZC108	12 483	155	1.670	0.732	HS	R
福鼎大白茶FD	5 206	324	0.697	1.530	R	HS
黔茶8号QC8	10 927	217	1.462	1.024	S	MR
乌牛早WNZ	12 754	211	1.707	0.996	HS	MR
黔辐4号QF4	1 843	187	0.247	0.883	HR	MR
黔茶1号QC1	9 440	285	1.263	1.345	S	S
金观音JGY	11 478	301	1.536	1.421	HS	S

茶树品种 Tea varieties	全年虫量比值 Pest number ratio in whole year		高峰期虫量比值 Pest number ratio in peak section		全年抗性等级 Resistance classification in whole year		高峰期抗性等级 Resistance classification in peak section
茶树品种 Tea varieties	DP	EM	DP	EM	DP	EM	DP	EM
苔选0310 TX0310	0.329	0.694	0.337	0.737	HR	R	HR	R
黄金芽HJY	0.889	0.675	0.816	0.458	MR	R	MR	R
保靖黄金茶BJHJC	0.656	1.440	0.603	1.206	R	S	R	S
白叶1号BY1	0.893	0.887	0.460	0.781	MR	MR	R	R
黔湄601 QM601	0.651	0.373	0.745	0.324	R	HR	R	HR
中茶108ZC108	1.670	0.732	1.937	0.692	HS	R	HS	R
福鼎大白茶FD	0.697	1.530	0.500	2.188	R	HS	R	HS
黔茶8号QC8	1.462	1.024	1.525	1.072	S	MR	HS	MR
乌牛早WNZ	1.707	0.996	1.791	1.083	HS	MR	HS	MR
黔辐4号QF4	0.247	0.883	0.233	0.826	HR	MR	HR	MR
黔茶1号QC1	1.263	1.345	1.412	1.094	S	S	S	MR
金观音JGY	1.536	1.421	1.639	1.540	HS	S	HS	HS

十二个茶树品种对茶棍蓟马、茶小绿叶蝉抗性表现及抗性成分初步鉴定

Resistance of 12 tea cultivars to Dendrothrips minowai Priesner and Empoasca Onukii Matsuda and a preliminary identification of resistant components

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 52

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

茶树品种 Tea varieties	没食子酸 GA	咖啡碱 CAF	表没食子儿茶素 EGC	儿茶素 C	表儿茶素 EC	表没食子儿茶素- 3-没食子酸酯 EGCG	没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯 GCG	表儿茶素-3- 没食子酸酯 ECG
苔选0310 TX0310	0.17± 0.006 C	4.02± 0.291 AB	2.20± 0.073 D	0.27± 0.011 B	0.89± 0.039 EF	9.90± 0.188 A	1.75± 0.230 A	2.64± 0.176 BC
黄金芽HJY	0.07± 0.003 FG	3.47± 0.251 BC	2.92± 0.098 B	0.24± 0.010 C	1.63± 0.072 A	6.45± 0.122 D	0.32± 0.042DEFG	3.82± 0.254 A
保靖黄金茶BJHJC	0.05± 0.002 H	3.46± 0.251 BC	3.12± 0.104 A	0.16± 0.007 E	1.03± 0.045 C	6.70± 0.127 D	0.37± 0.049 DEF	2.09± 0.139 DE
白叶1号BY1	0.12± 0.005 E	2.70± 0.195 DE	2.22± 0.074 D	0.19± 0.008 D	0.74± 0.033 GH	5.93± 0.112 E	0.44± 0.057 CDE	1.23± 0.082 G
黔湄601 QM601	0.06± 0.002 G	3.90± 0.282 ABC	1.71± 0.057 E	0.26± 0.011 BC	0.90± 0.040 DE	5.13± 0.097 F	0.26± 0.035 EFG	2.18± 0.145 DE
中茶108ZC108	0.15± 0.006 D	3.28± 0.238 CD	2.24± 0.075 D	0.13± 0.005 F	0.67± 0.030 H	5.73± 0.109 E	0.54± 0.072 CD	1.97± 0.131 EF
福鼎大白茶FD	0.05± 0.002 H	2.82± 0.204 DE	2.53± 0.085 C	0.11± 0.004 G	0.79± 0.035 FG	4.63± 0.088 G	0.15± 0.020 FG	1.19± 0.080 G
黔茶8号QC8	0.08± 0.003 F	3.28± 0.237 CD	2.43± 0.081 C	0.18± 0.008 DE	0.87± 0.038 EF	7.63± 0.145 C	0.48± 0.063 CDE	2.29± 0.152 CDE
乌牛早WNZ	0.08± 0.003 F	2.62± 0.190 E	3.24± 0.108 A	0.18± 0.007 DE	1.19± 0.053 B	4.01± 0.076 H	0.13± 0.017 G	1.69± 0.113 F
黔辐4号QF4	0.18± 0.007 C	4.49± 0.325 A	2.45± 0.082 C	0.39± 0.016 A	0.99± 0.044 CD	7.88± 0.149 C	0.99± 0.130 B	2.78± 0.185 B
黔茶1号QC1	0.27± 0.010 A	3.72± 0.269 BC	2.06± 0.069 D	0.17± 0.007 DE	0.72± 0.032 GH	8.25± 0.156 B	0.64± 0.084 C	2.12± 0.141 DE
金观音JGY	0.19± 0.007 B	3.76± 0.272 BC	1.36± 0.045 F	0.18± 0.008 DE	0.68± 0.030 H	5.31± 0.101 F	0.49± 0.064 CDE	2.43± 0.162 BCD

氨基酸组分 Amino acids	苔选0310 TX0310	黄金芽 HJY	保靖黄金茶BJHJC	白叶1号 BY1	黔湄601 QM601	中茶108 ZC108	福鼎大白茶FD	黔茶8号 QC8	乌牛早 WNZ	黔辐4号 QF4	黔茶1号 QC1	金观音 JGY
天冬氨酸 Asp	1 278.2± 43.4 F	3 330.4± 85.5 A	3 009.9± 29.3 B	2 964.3± 48.2 B	2 124.8± 17.4 C	2 098.5± 15.8 C	1 641.1± 38.3 E	1 249.0± 14.9 F	1 901.7± 42.3 D	816.9± 21.3 H	1 147.1± 49.3 G	1 225.1± 37.3 FG
谷氨酸 Glu	1 628.9± 52.0 H	4 494.1± 158.4 A	4 122.1± 47.1 B	3 574.1± 46.3 C	2 090.8± 33.3 F	3 032.6± 63.6 D	2 554.8± 44.9 E	1 924.0± 6.1 G	3 540.2± 41.4 C	1 064.0± 32.2 I	1 480.2± 80.0 H	1 804.4± 60.7 G
丝氨酸 Ser	384.8± 8.9 C	389.5± 11.9 C	407.0± 7.6 C	511.0± 8.2 A	253.5± 5.8 F	443.4± 3.1 B	321.2± 6.1 D	324.3± 5.1 D	530.2± 21.4 A	282.2± 17.2 E	266.1± 15.9 EF	400.3± 2.7 C
甘氨酸 Gly	25.8± 1.9 D	27.2± 1.6 D	48.8± 7.3 B	58.3± 6.7 A	20.0± 0.5 D	35.6± 1.1 C	26.1± 2.3 D	9.9± 0.1 E	42.0± 2.3 BC	20.9± 1.6 D	19.2± 1.8 D	37.8± 2.6 C
组氨酸 His	38.5± 3.9 H	319.0± 38.9 B	87.3± 1.5 FG	322.4± 18.6 B	177.0± 1.9 D	56.5± 1.3 GH	110.3± 2.8 EF	136.0± 3.4 E	492.8± 6.6 A	269.8± 12.4 C	289.4± 9.0 BC	124.8± 3.1 E
γ-氨基丁酸 GABA	43.4± 2.6 FG	501.1± 7.0 B	700.2± 13.8 A	436.3± 7.5 C	52.5± 2.1 F	310.6± 3.7 D	134.2± 3.6 E	30.4± 3.0 G	422.7± 11.5 C	139.8± 9.2 E	12.4± 3.0 H	29.8± 1.8 G
精氨酸 Arg	34.7± 1.3 C	21.3± 0.3 D	35.5± 1.0 C	4.6± 0.2 F	3.0± 0.02 F	14.0± 2.1 E	72.5± 3.7 B	21.3± 5.5 D	82.8± 5.6 A	20.3± 0.9 DE	22.2± 3.4 D	40.7± 0.7 C
苏氨酸 Thr	114.4± 4.3 D	183.9± 10.2 B	124.1± 7.4 D	197.7± 11.6 A	112.4± 2.1 D	92.6± 1.2 E	119.8± 3.3 D	85.5± 0.4 E	164.4± 2.7 C	53.9± 2.2 F	168.0± 3.5 C	63.4± 0.7 F
丙氨酸 Ala	108.6± 5.7 G	228.6± 5.6 D	337.5± 16.3 B	270.7± 10.9 C	80.2± 0.9 H	271.4± 3.3 C	129.7± 4.2 F	74.3± 1.5 H	479.0± 5.4 A	135.5± 6.9 F	195.7± 2.6 E	240.1± 5.6 D
脯氨酸 Pro	55.1± 2.3 C	35.3± 2.0 EF	63.2± 0.6 B	53.0± 3.8 C	31.9± 1.0 F	39.5± 1.8 DE	41.8± 4.9 DE	54.3± 1.9 C	73.3± 4.6 A	45.9± 3.5 D	40.7± 1.9 DE	42.7± 3.0 D
酪氨酸 Tyr	71.4± 4.1 B	43.7± 1.7 D	9.6± 4.1 G	19.4± 1.0 EF	50.1± 1.5 C	11.2± 0.6 G	40.5± 0.9 D	351.2± 5.3 A	21.2± 1.2 E	22.4± 0.7 E	21.0± 2.1 E	14.6± 0.9 FG
缬氨酸 Val	35.3± 0.7 B	18.1± 1.3 C	35.3± 21.9 B	14.6± 3.1 C	24.2± 1.2 BC	61.7± 2.6 A	66.9± 2.5 A	53.4± 1.5 A	17.9± 0.4 C	9.5± 0.6 C	9.0± 0.8 C	10.5± 0.7 C
蛋氨酸 Met	23.2± 1.8 A	7.6± 1.1 DE	8.7± 0.9 CDE	8.9± 0.3 CDE	9.1± 0.6 CDE	12.7± 0.6 B	8.3± 0.8 CDE	10.5± 0.4 BCD	10.2± 0.9 BCD	9.6± 0.7 CDE	6.9± 3.2 E	10.8± 0.3 BC
半胱氨酸 Cys	408.1± 58.8 CDE	331.6± 45.5 EFG	400.1± 54.6 DEF	702.3± 74.0 A	528.4± 13.1 B	440.8± 29.8 BCD	467.7± 20.8 BCD	536.8± 48.0 B	410.7± 16.3 CDE	291.1± 45.4 G	510.8± 44.2 BC	300.8± 19.2 FG
异亮氨酸 Ile	316.4± 8.3 F	216.5± 15.5 H	166.4± 7.3 I	198.1± 4.9 H	240.7± 2.3 G	151.5± 2.9 I	200.5± 3.5 H	510.7± 4.2 C	382.1± 4.6 E	748.7± 16.3 A	666.9± 16.4 B	481.7± 2.5 D
亮氨酸 Leu	56.7± 1.0 A	30.5± 1.2 FG	42.5± 4.4 C	50.3± 0.9 B	36.1± 2.5 DE	38.9± 1.5 CDE	35.2± 0.8 EF	36.7± 2.1 DE	41.6± 1.6 CD	24.9± 2.1 G	26.6± 3.6 G	30.3± 2.3 G
苯丙氨酸 Phe	49.1± 0.7 C	23.7± 1.1 E	12.2± 0.3 F	26.0± 0.6 DE	34.7± 2.0 DE	29.5± 2.0 DE	37.0± 0.9 D	27.1± 1.1 DE	184.7± 6.2 AB	192.9± 12.3 A	179.0± 5.4 B	177.1± 4.4 B
赖氨酸 Lys	15.6± 0.7 C	17.0± 1.1 B	18.9± 0.2 A	13.1± 0.4 D	10.3± 0.7 E	8.6± 0.7 FG	11.7± 0.2 D	8.5± 0.9 FG	12.9± 0.4 D	9.0± 0.5 EF	7.5± 0.04 G	7.3± 0.4 G
茶氨酸 Theanine	4 950.0± 450.0 H	15 700.0± 800.0 B	12 700.0± 800.0 CDE	19 000.0± 1 200.0 A	12 250.0± 250.0 DE	15 100.0± 200.0 BC	14 450.0± 450.0 BCD	13 250.0± 1 250.0 BCDE	9 500.0± 900.0 FG	8 250.0± 50.0 G	11 650.0± 750.0 EF	13 450.0± 2 550.0 BCDE

氨基酸组分	DP虫量比值	EM虫量比值	没食子酸、咖啡碱及儿茶素组分	DP虫量比值	EM虫量比值
Amino acids	Pest number ratio(DP)	Pest number ratio(EM)	Gallic acid、Caffeine and Catechin components	Pest number ratio(DP)	Pest number ratio(EM)
天冬氨酸Asp	0.007	-0.280	没食子酸 GA	0.189	-0.077
谷氨酸Glu	0.252	-0.035	咖啡碱CAF	-0.636^*	-0.385
丝氨酸Ser	0.566	0.112	表没食子儿茶素EGC	0.042	0.189
甘氨酸Gly	0.273	0.196	儿茶素C	-0.552	-0.685^*
组氨酸His	0.238	-0.161	表儿茶素EC	-0.378	-0.273
γ-氨基丁酸GABA	-0.084	-0.147	表没食子儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯EGCG	-0.434	-0.126
精氨酸Arg	0.266	0.685^*	没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯GCG	-0.231	-0.147
苏氨酸Thr	0.119	0.000	表儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯ECG	-0.378	-0.469
丙氨酸Ala	0.490	0.224
脯氨酸Pro	0.070	0.392
酪氨酸Tyr	-0.350	-0.413
缬氨酸Val	0.007	0.077
蛋氨酸Met	0.182	-0.245
半胱氨酸Cys	0.224	0.000
异亮氨酸Ile	-0.063	0.049
亮氨酸Leu	0.049	-0.119
苯丙氨酸Phe	0.028	0.063
赖氨酸Lys	-0.413	-0.210
茶氨酸Theanine	0.364	0.084

[1]	杨春, 乔大河, 郭燕, 梁思慧, 林开勤, 陈正武. 115份贵州茶树资源氨基酸和茶氨酸分析与特异资源筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1351-1360.
[2]	邹振浩, 孙业良, 赵玉宝, 李鑫, 张丽平, 张兰, 董春旺, 付建玉, 韩文炎, 颜鹏. 采摘花芽对春茶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(7): 1369-1376.
[3]	陆景伟, 陈国康, 周娜, 魏捷, 胡燕, 郑阳, 陶伟林. 六个丝瓜品种对南方根结线虫的抗性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 959-965.
[4]	吴小清, 周菲菲, 叶影, 黄艳梅, 杨蕾玉, 黄海涛, 吴媛媛. 不同茶树品种制龙井茶的香气特征研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 437-446.
[5]	谢文钢, 陈玮, 谭礼强, 杨洋, 唐茜. 茶树品种峨眉问春和川茶2号新梢主要生化成分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1592-1601.
[6]	张晴晴, 刘连忠, 宁井铭, 吴国栋, 江朝晖, 李孟杰, 李栋梁. 基于YOLOV3优化模型的复杂场景下茶树嫩芽识别[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1740-1747.
[7]	黄宣, 金林灿, 叶朝辉, 姜洁锋, 施贤波. 浙江近年育成粳稻新品种(系)部分抗病虫基因的分子检测与育种应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1159-1169.
[8]	安红卫, 宋勤飞, 牛素贞. 贵州茶树种质资源遗传多样性、群体结构和遗传分化研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1234-1243.
[9]	翟秀明, 李解, 唐敏, 胡方洁, 张军, 侯渝嘉, 徐泽. 重庆30份茶树种质资源农艺性状与生化成分多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1244-1255.
[10]	杨梅, 胡小兰, 申涛, 谭康, 刘代铃, 邱红波. 玉米第8染色体单片段代换系的构建与灰斑病抗性材料筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 383-389.
[11]	孙达, 龚恕, 崔宏春, 郭敏明, 郑旭霞. 不同品种茶树春秋季鲜叶超微绿茶粉适制性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 437-446.
[12]	王治会, 彭华, 杨普香, 江新凤, 李文金, 岳翠男, 李琛, 李延升. 17份黄金菊茶树自然杂交单株的表型变异与资源价值评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 298-307.
[13]	王贤, 刘放, 魏小红, 朱晓林, 王宝强. 不同种质番茄材料抗番茄黄化曲叶病毒病特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(11): 2085-2097.
[14]	牛素贞, 赵支飞, 宋勤飞, 陈正武. 贵州野生茶树种质资源立地环境多样性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1223-1232.
[15]	牛素贞, 安红卫, 宋勤飞, 陈正武. 贵州野生茶树立地土壤养分状况分析及综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 1039-1048.