不同安全利用技术对琼北地区稻菜轮作系统镉削减的效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.16

浙江农业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1725-1733.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.08.16

不同安全利用技术对琼北地区稻菜轮作系统镉削减的效果

黄锋¹(), 邢建平¹, 符少怀¹, 潘攀²^,³, 吴琳²^,³, 刘贝贝²^,³, 陈淼²^,³^,^*()

1.海南省农业生态与资源保护总站,海南海口 571100
2.中国热带农业科学院环境与植物保护研究所,海南海口 571101
3.国家农业环境儋州观测实验站,海南儋州 571737

收稿日期:2021-08-08 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-08-26
通讯作者: 陈淼
作者简介:*陈淼,E-mail: chenm200567@163.com
黄锋(1981—),男,海南海口人,学士,园艺师,主要从事农业资源与环境保护工作。E-mail: 49069866@qq.com
基金资助:
海南省自然科学基金(319QN274);海南省自然科学基金(420MS084);海南省重点研发计划(ZDYF2019221);中国热带农业科学院基本科研业务费专项资金(1630042019004);中国热带农业科学院基本科研业务费专项资金(1630042021010)

Effects of different safe utilization technologies on cadmium reduction in rice-vegetable rotation system in northern Hainan, China

HUANG Feng¹(), XING Jianping¹, FU Shaohuai¹, PAN Pan²^,³, WU Lin²^,³, LIU Beibei²^,³, CHEN Miao²^,³^,^*()

1. Agricultural Ecology and Resource Protection Station of Hainan, Haikou 571100, China
2. Institute of Environment and Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
3. National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment in Danzhou, Danzhou 571737, Hainan, China

Received:2021-08-08 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-08-26
Contact: CHEN Miao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨不同安全利用技术在海南镉污染耕地上的应用效果,以琼北地区轻中度镉污染稻菜轮作耕地为研究对象,比较了6种安全利用技术对辣椒和稻米中Cd积累的削减效果,以及9种钝化剂对稻米Cd积累的影响。结果表明,各项安全利用技术的降Cd效果由高到低依次为优化施肥+土壤调理+叶面阻控>土壤调理+叶面阻控>优化施肥+叶面阻控>土壤调理>叶面阻控>优化施肥,在辣椒和稻米上的降Cd率分别为61.6%~91.5%、49.4%~91.3%,6项安全利用措施下辣椒Cd暴露的膳食安全风险均可接受,但仅优化施肥+土壤调理+叶面阻控和土壤调理+叶面阻控处理下稻米Cd暴露的膳食安全风险在可接受范围内。施用9种钝化剂均可显著(P<0.05)降低稻米Cd含量,但降Cd率差别较大,变化范围在29.7%~77.0%。其中,生物炭和磷复合钝化剂(生物炭+磷矿粉、生物炭+活化磷矿粉)、蚯蚓粪和铁磷复合钝化剂(蚯蚓粪+零价铁+磷矿粉)的施用效果最佳,稻米降Cd率在 68%以上。针对海南轻中度镉污染耕地,宜采用优化施肥+土壤调理+叶面阻控和土壤调理+叶面阻控的联合措施,其中土壤调理技术中的钝化剂推荐使用生物炭和磷复合钝化剂或蚯蚓粪和铁磷复合钝化剂。

关键词: 安全利用技术, 稻菜轮作, 镉, 钝化剂

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the effects of safe utilization technologies on Cd-contaminated farmland in Hainan, rice-vegetable rotation system in northern Hainan with light to moderate Cd pollution was selected as the study object. The effects of 6 safe utilization technologies on Cd reduction in pepper and rice, and the effects of 9 passivators on Cd accumulation in rice were compared. The results showed that the Cd reduction effects of various safe utilization technologies decreased in the order of optimal fertilization+soil conditioning+foliage resistance>soil conditioning+foliage resistance>optimal fertilization+foliage resistance>soil conditioning>foliage resistance>optimal fertilization, and the Cd reduction rates in pepper and rice were 61.6%-91.5%, 49.4%-91.3%, respectively. All these technologies reduced health risk of Cd-intake by pepper to an acceptable range, but only optimal fertilization+soil conditioning+foliage resistance and soil conditioning+foliage resistance reduced the health risk of Cd-intake by rice to an acceptable range. Applying passivators could significantly (P<0.05) reduce Cd content in rice, but the Cd reduction rates varied from 29.7% to 77.0%. Among them, biochar and phosphorus combined passivator (biochar+phosphate rock powder, biochar+activated phosphate rock powder), vermicompost and iron phosphorus combined passivator (vermicompost+zero-valent iron+phosphate rock powder) had better effect, and the Cd reduction rate of rice was higher than 68%. In conclusion, optimal fertilization+soil conditioning+foliage resistance, soil conditioning+foliage resistance were feasible for the safe utilization of Cd-contaminated farmland in Hainan, and biochar and phosphorus combined passivator, and vermicompost and iron phosphorus combined passivator were recommended passivators for soil conditioning.

Key words: safe utilization technology, rice-vegetable rotation, cadmium, passivators

中图分类号:

S156.6

黄锋, 邢建平, 符少怀, 潘攀, 吴琳, 刘贝贝, 陈淼. 不同安全利用技术对琼北地区稻菜轮作系统镉削减的效果[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1725-1733.

HUANG Feng, XING Jianping, FU Shaohuai, PAN Pan, WU Lin, LIU Beibei, CHEN Miao. Effects of different safe utilization technologies on cadmium reduction in rice-vegetable rotation system in northern Hainan, China[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2022, 34(8): 1725-1733.

图/表 5

参考文献 30

[1]	梁捷, 孙宏飞, 葛成军, 等. 海南省主要农作物主产区土壤重金属含量分布及其健康风险评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(11): 2285-2293.
	LIANG J, SUN H F, GE C J, et al. Distribution of heavy metal contents in soils of main crop production areas in Hainan and the health risk assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(11): 2285-2293. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	李佳桐. 琼北土壤高背景值区域重金属空间分布及健康风险评价[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2018.
	LI J T. Spatial distribution characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metal in soils in the north of Hainan Province with high background value[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	GONG Y Y, ZHAO D Y, WANG Q L. An overview of field-scale studies on remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids: technical progress over the last decade[J]. Water Research, 2018, 147: 440-460. DOI URL
[4]	WAN X M, LEI M, CHEN T B. Review on remediation technologies for arsenic-contaminated soil[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2019, 14(2): 1-14.
[5]	UDDIN M K. A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 308: 438-462. DOI URL
[6]	ZENG G M, WAN J, HUANG D L, et al. Precipitation, adsorption and rhizosphere effect: the mechanisms for phosphate-induced Pb immobilization in soils: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 339: 354-367. DOI URL
[7]	周于宁. 组合钝化剂对轻中度镉污染农田土壤的钝化效果及其稳定性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.
	ZHOU Y N. Study on the immobilization effect and stability of mild and moderate cadmium contaminated farmland soil by combination of passivators[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	陈喆, 铁柏清, 雷鸣, 等. 施硅方式对稻米镉阻隔潜力研究[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(7): 2762-2770.
	CHEN Z, TIE B Q, LEI M, et al. Phytoexclusion potential studies of Si fertilization modes on rice cadmium[J]. Environmental Science, 2014, 35(7): 2762-2770. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	徐奕, 李剑睿, 黄青青, 等. 坡缕石钝化与喷施叶面硅肥联合对水稻吸收累积镉效应影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(9): 1633-1641.
	XU Y, LI J R, HUANG Q Q, et al. Effect of palygorskite immobilization combined with foliar silicon fertilizer application on Cd accumulation in rice[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2016, 35(9): 1633-1641. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	冯雪敏. 水稻富集镉砷的关键部位、生育时期及相关元素的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2017.
	FENG X M. The key parts, important growth stages and related elements in Cd/As accumulation of rice[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	骆永明, 滕应. 我国土壤污染的区域差异与分区治理修复策略[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2): 145-152.
	LUO Y M, TENG Y. Regional difference in soil pollution and strategy of soil zonal governance and remediation in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(2): 145-152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	林生, 张家玮, 李建宏, 等. 6种海南商品有机肥对Pb(Ⅱ)和Cu(Ⅱ)的复合吸附及解吸[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 47(1): 97-103.
	LIN S, ZHANG J W, LI J H, et al. Adsorption and desorption of Pb(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅱ) by six commercial organic fertilizers from Hainan Province[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 47(1): 97-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	罗春岩, 张家玮, 王雨阳, 等. 不同种类有机肥对土壤铅、铜形态转化的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(6): 78-85.
	LUO C Y, ZHANG J W, WANG Y Y, et al. Impact of different organic fertilizers on the form and transformation of lead and copper in soil[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(6): 78-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	张婧旻, 李建宏, 洪思诚, 等. 椰纤维生物炭对砖红壤水稻土Pb形态及水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(9): 1886-1892.
	ZHANG J M, LI J H, HONG S C, et al. Effect of coconut fiber-derived biochars amendments on geochemical fractions of Pb in paddy soils and yield and quality of rice[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(9): 1886-1892. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	刘绪坤, 徐文, 黄一伦, 等. 利用生物炭与石灰钝化(修复)琼北土壤中的铬污染[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(3): 254-259.
	LIU X K, XU W, HUANG Y L, et al. Biochar and lime passivation remediation of heavy metal chromium pollution in Qiongbei soil[J]. Natural Science Journal of Hainan University, 2020, 38(3): 254-259. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
[17]	United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Integrated risk information system[EB/OL]. [2021-08-08]. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.show SubstanceList.
[18]	环境保护部. 中国人群环境暴露行为模式研究报告:成人卷[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2013.
[19]	CHEN Y, HU W Y, HUANG B, et al. Accumulation and health risk of heavy metals in vegetables from harmless and organic vegetable production systems of China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2013, 98: 324-330. DOI URL
[20]	曹胜, 欧阳梦云, 周卫军, 等. 石灰对土壤重金属污染修复的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(26): 109-112.
	CAO S, OUYANG M Y, ZHOU W J, et al. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by lime: a review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(26): 109-112. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	HAMID Y, TANG L, HUSSAIN B, et al. Organic soil additives for the remediation of cadmium contaminated soils and their impact on the soil-plant system: a review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 707: 136121.
[22]	QIN S Y, LIU H E, NIE Z J, et al. Toxicity of cadmium and its competition with mineral nutrients for uptake by plants: a review[J]. Pedosphere, 2020, 30(2): 168-180. DOI URL
[23]	冯敬云, 聂新星, 刘波, 等. 镉污染农田原位钝化修复效果及其机理研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(5): 764-777.
	FENG J Y, NIE X X, LIU B, et al. Efficiency of in situ passivation remediation in cadmium-contaminated farmland soil and its mechanism: a review[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(5): 764-777. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	YANG J Y, CHEN X, LU W C, et al. Reducing Cd accumulation in rice grain with foliar application of glycerol and its mechanisms of Cd transport inhibition[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 258: 127135.
[25]	戴青云, 刘代欢, 王德新, 等. 硅对水稻生长的影响及其缓解镉毒害机理研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(5): 86-92.
	DAI Q Y, LIU D H, WANG D X, et al. A review on silicon: effect on rice growth and its mechanism of relieving cadmium toxicity[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(5): 86-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	SHI G R, ZHANG Z, LIU C F. Silicon influences cadmium translocation by altering subcellular distribution and chemical forms of cadmium in peanut roots[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2017, 63(1): 117-123. DOI URL
[27]	WANG J, SHI L, ZHAI L L, et al. Analysis of the long-term effectiveness of biochar immobilization remediation on heavy metal contaminated soil and the potential environmental factors weakening the remediation effect: a review[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 207: 111261.
[28]	LIU B B, HE Z L, LIU R L, et al. Comparative effectiveness of activated dolomite phosphate rock and biochar for immobilizing cadmium and lead in soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 266: 129202.
[29]	潘攀, 刘贝贝, 吴琳, 等. 蚯蚓粪与零价铁、磷矿粉对酸性土壤改良和重金属风险控制研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(4): 1549-1557.
	PAN P, LIU B B, WU L, et al. Influential effects of vermicompost, zero-valentiron and phosphate rock on properties and heavy metal risks of acid soil[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(4): 1549-1557. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	QIAO J T, LIU T X, WANG X Q, et al. Simultaneous alleviation of cadmium and arsenic accumulation in rice by applying zero-valent iron and biochar to contaminated paddy soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 195: 260-271. DOI URL

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

602

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	4	0	0	598

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	340	262
比例	56%	44%

摘要

388

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	388

	来源	本网站

	次数	388
	比例	100%

检测指标 Indexes	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum	均值 Mean
pH	4.9	6.1	5.4
OM/(g·kg^-1)	12.5	32.5	20.5
CEC/(cmol^+.kg^-1)	2.4	7.9	5.7
Cd/(mg·kg^-1)	0.01	0.85	0.53
As/(mg·kg^-1)	3.9	13.8	10.8
Ni/(mg·kg^-1)	21.8	42.0	29.5
Cr/(mg·kg^-1)	46.5	74.8	59.2
Pb/(mg·kg^-1)	14.9	43.2	34.8
ACd/(mg·kg^-1)	0.01	0.54	0.37

检测指标 Indexes	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum	均值 Mean
pH	4.9	6.1	5.4
OM/(g·kg^-1)	12.5	32.5	20.5
CEC/(cmol^+.kg^-1)	2.4	7.9	5.7
Cd/(mg·kg^-1)	0.01	0.85	0.53
As/(mg·kg^-1)	3.9	13.8	10.8
Ni/(mg·kg^-1)	21.8	42.0	29.5
Cr/(mg·kg^-1)	46.5	74.8	59.2
Pb/(mg·kg^-1)	14.9	43.2	34.8
ACd/(mg·kg^-1)	0.01	0.54	0.37

钝化剂 Passivator	pH	OM/%	Cd/(mg· kg^-1)
石灰Lime	9.3	—	2.73
生物炭Biochar	8.4	21.3	0.35
蚯蚓粪Vermicompost	7.4	20.8	1.07
磷矿粉Phosphate rock powder	9.5	—	1.5
活化磷矿粉	9.6	—	2.43
Activated phosphate rock powder
竹炭有机肥Bamboo organic fertilizer	6.6	16.3	1.19
腐殖酸肥Humic acid fertilizer	9.5	—	1.08
零价铁Zero-valent iron	9.3	—	—

钝化剂 Passivator	pH	OM/%	Cd/(mg· kg^-1)
石灰Lime	9.3	—	2.73
生物炭Biochar	8.4	21.3	0.35
蚯蚓粪Vermicompost	7.4	20.8	1.07
磷矿粉Phosphate rock powder	9.5	—	1.5
活化磷矿粉	9.6	—	2.43
Activated phosphate rock powder
竹炭有机肥Bamboo organic fertilizer	6.6	16.3	1.19
腐殖酸肥Humic acid fertilizer	9.5	—	1.08
零价铁Zero-valent iron	9.3	—	—

处理 Treatment	辣椒Pepper		水稻Rice
处理 Treatment	镉含量 Cd content/(mg·kg^-1)	降镉率 Cd reduction rate/%	镉含量 Cd content/(mg·kg^-1)	降镉率 Cd reduction rate/%
T₁	0.352 ± 0.014 a	—	0.837 ± 0.041 a	—
T₂	0.135 ± 0.011 b	61.6	0.424 ± 0.023 b	49.4
T₃	0.122 ± 0.010 bc	65.3	0.280 ± 0.014 c	66.6
T₄	0.112 ±0.010 c	68.2	0.267 ± 0.018 c	68.1
T₅	0.055 ± 0.008 d	84.4	0.247 ± 0.016 c	70.5
T₆	0.036 ± 0.006 d	89.8	0.097 ± 0.008 d	88.5
T₇	0.030 ± 0.004 d	91.5	0.072 ± 0.006 d	91.3

不同安全利用技术对琼北地区稻菜轮作系统镉削减的效果

Effects of different safe utilization technologies on cadmium reduction in rice-vegetable rotation system in northern Hainan, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

处理 Treatment	土壤Soil					水稻Rice
处理 Treatment	pH	CEC/ (cmol·kg^-1)	OM/ (g·kg^-1)	Cd/ (mg·kg^-1)	ACd/ (mg·kg^-1)	Cd/ (mg·kg^-1)	BCF	降镉率 Cd reduction rate/%
S₁	5.5 d	5.96 c	18.8 b	0.353 a	0.081 1 a	0.539 a	1.527 a	—
S₂	6.9 a	6.29 b	19.4 b	0.342 a	0.012 4 d	0.332 b	0.971 b	38.3
S₃	6.0 c	6.69 b	26.7 a	0.338 a	0.079 9 b	0.189 c	0.559 c	64.9
S₄	6.6 bc	7.73 a	20.7 ab	0.364 a	0.064 0 b	0.349 b	0.959 b	35.2
S₅	6.5 bc	8.81 a	17.3 b	0.319 a	0.069 8 b	0.208 c	0.652 c	61.4
S₆	6.3 bc	7.34 a	19.5 ab	0.369 a	0.059 0 c	0.368 b	0.997 b	31.7
S₇	6.7 b	6.60 b	19.3 ab	0.350 a	0.059 8 c	0.379 b	1.083 b	29.7
S₈	6.8 a	7.45 a	20.1 ab	0.333 a	0.045 5 c	0.171 d	0.514 d	68.3
S₉	6.5 bc	6.22 b	19.9 ab	0.357 a	0.045 0 c	0.159 d	0.445 d	70.4
S₁₀	6.7 a	8.23 a	20.9 ab	0.336 a	0.031 9 c	0.124 d	0.369 d	77.0

[1]	姜昊梁, 黄允, 梁绍芳, 谢梦晨, 徐天成, 宋芷婷, 向文文, 陈青春, 万小荣, 孙伟. 镉胁迫对不同甜玉米自交系幼苗生长的影响及其相关简单重复序列分子标记初筛[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(8): 1582-1590.
[2]	邰粤鹰, 何腾兵, 陈小然, 张旺, 黄啸云, 刘鸿雁, 高珍冉. 叶面喷施阻控剂对常淹水稻田水稻吸收转运镉的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6): 1248-1257.
[3]	杜红, 李玉鹏, 程文, 肖荣英, 胡鹏. 丛枝菌根真菌改善镉胁迫下植物根系和土壤微环境的效应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(5): 1039-1048.
[4]	王灿, 付天岭, 龚思同, 娄飞, 周凯, 代良羽, 刘静, 林大松, 何腾兵. 叶面阻控剂对黔中喀斯特地区水稻Cd富集特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(9): 1710-1719.
[5]	刘如, 董畅茹, 张祎雯, 屈铭慧, 张伟, 洒海洋, 陈海燕, 叶文玲, 樊霆. 镉胁迫下黑曲霉TL-F2的促生特征及其对黑麦草种子萌发、幼苗生长和镉含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 326-334.
[6]	董爱琴, 李建国, 杨涛, 陈院华, 徐昌旭, 万辉, 彭志平, 谢杰. 金属硫酸盐浸种对水稻种子萌发和秧苗镉吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2213-2223.
[7]	谷建诚, 郭彬, 林义成, 傅庆林, 刘琛, 丁能飞, 李华, 李凝玉. 根表铁膜对水稻镉吸收的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 963-970.
[8]	朱森林, 梅忠, 邢承华. 缺磷抑制拟南芥对镉的吸收[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5): 804-809.
[9]	邹传, 郭彬, 林义成, 傅庆林, 刘琛, 丁能飞, 李凝玉, 李华. 不同粒径腐殖酸颗粒对土壤有效态镉的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4): 616-623.
[10]	谢杰, 董爱琴, 徐昌旭, 苏金平, 范芳, 胡美蓉, 刘佳. 紫云英长期还田对稻田土壤Cd含量与形态的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(12): 2084-2094.
[11]	姜武, 吴志刚, 陈松林, 陶正明. 镉胁迫对铁皮石斛叶片抗氧化酶活性的影响及动力学分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(9): 1421-1429.
[12]	尤方芳1，赵铭钦1，*，陈发元1，孙翠红1，许跃奇1，李慧2，金洪石3，金江华3. 生物炭与不同肥料配施对镉胁迫下烟株生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(3): 489-.
[13]	郭晓静1，2，胡承孝1，2，赵小虎1，2，*，谭启玲1，2，孙学成1，2. 不同种植模式下蔬菜吸收积累镉的差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 1387-.
[14]	周芳如，杨友才*，兰时乐. 高效去除镉污染真菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(4): 636-.
[15]	郭江波;唐炳;王建英;蔡禄;辛翠花*. 镉胁迫对烟草生理特性的影响[J]. , 2013, 25(6): 0-1283.