有机、SEQ、特别与常规栽培对8种蔬菜产量、品质的影响

›› 2009, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (05): 0-480.

• 论文 •

有机、SEQ、特别与常规栽培对8种蔬菜产量、品质的影响

程慧林¹,孙连飞²,和文龙¹, 杨决平², 李峰¹

¹南京农业大学有机农业与有机食品研究所,江苏南京210095; ²上海市松江区农业技术推广中心,上海松江201611

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-09-25 发布日期:2009-09-25

Effects of organic, SEQ, special and conventional farming on the yield and quality of eight kinds of vegetables

CHENG Hui-lin;SUN Lian-fei;HE Wen-long;YANG Jue-ping;LI Feng

1.Research Institute of Organic Farming and Organic Food,Nanjing Agricultural University ,Nanjing 210095 ,China; 2.Agricultural Technology Popularization Center of Songjiang District of Shanghai,Shanghai 201611 ,China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-09-25 Published:2009-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

文章分析比较了田间试验第2年，有机、SEQ、特别与常规栽培对8种蔬菜产量、品质的影响。结果表明，不同栽培方式8种蔬菜的产量趋势基本一致，即常规最高，有机最低，特别与SEQ居中。与常规栽培相比，有机栽培蔬菜减产幅度达到11．1％～64．4％。有机与常规栽培萝h、西兰花、番茄的产量差异达到1％水平显著，其他5种蔬菜的产量差异未达到5％水平显著。有机栽培番茄、芹菜的品质显著优于常规栽培的，Vc、干物质、可溶性糖含量较高，硝酸盐含量较低。但是有机与常规栽培西兰花、黄瓜、毛豆的品质差异不大。SEQ、特别栽培蔬菜的品质介于有机与常规栽培之间。

关键词: 有机栽培, SEQ栽培, 特别栽培, 常规栽培, 蔬菜, 产量, 品质

Abstract: A field experiment was carried on to study the effects of organic,SEQ,special and conventional farming on the yield and quality of eight kinds of vegetables in the second year. The changes in the yield of eight kinds of vegetables showed basically identical tendency. Compared with the conventional farming system,the yield of organic farming system decreased 11.1% to 64.4%. There was extremely significant difference between the yield of organic and conventional radish, broccoli and tomato, but no significant difference was found in other five kinds of vegetables. Organic tomato and celery were of better quality than conventional ones, containing more vitamin C, dry matter and soluble sugar,less nitrate. There was no significant difference between the quality of organic and conventional broccoli,cucumber and vegetable soybean. The quality of SEQ and special farming vegetables ranged between organic and conventional ones.

Key words: organic farming, SEQ farming, special farming, conventional farming, vegetable, yield, quality

程慧林;孙连飞;和文龙;杨决平;李峰. 有机、SEQ、特别与常规栽培对8种蔬菜产量、品质的影响[J]. , 2009, 21(05): 0-480.

CHENG Hui-lin;SUN Lian-fei;HE Wen-long;YANG Jue-ping;LI Feng . Effects of organic, SEQ, special and conventional farming on the yield and quality of eight kinds of vegetables[J]. , 2009, 21(05): 0-480.

[1]	温明霞, 张顺昌, 吴韶辉, 胡丽鹏, 王鹏, 黄贝. 蛋白水解氨基酸肥料对红美人杂柑果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(3): 422-428.
[2]	陈丹, 汤翠凤, 董超, 甘树仙, 李俊, 阿新祥, 张斐斐, 杨雅云, 牛赛赛, 戴陆园. 云南软米地方品种籽粒淀粉品质特性研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 203-214.
[3]	李甜竹, 孙玉文, 汪季涛, 甘德芳, 胡克玲. 不同贮藏温度对糙皮侧耳采后品质及木质素积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 248-258.
[4]	崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 向江, 李明山, 吴江, . 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 52-61.
[5]	廖朝美, 游敏芳, 谭光辉, 李杰章, 张依裕, 覃媛钰, 刘若余. 三穗鸭PRKCB基因内含子14的变异对蛋壳品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1574-1580.
[6]	李金武, 郁继华, 吕剑, 冯致, 杨海兴, 车旭升, 秦启杰, 张洋, 金宁. 不同覆盖方式对高原夏季露地松花菜产量、品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1626-1633.
[7]	郑许松, 钟列权, 王会福, 陈方景, 成丽萍, 徐启强, 李阳, 钟旭华, 吕仲贤. 减肥控制病虫害技术在浙江省不同稻区的实践[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(9): 1656-1664.
[8]	张统帅, 闫丽娟, 李广, 陈国鹏, 罗永忠. 免耕和秸秆覆盖对旱作区土壤氮素、水分和春小麦产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1329-1341.
[9]	喻宗岗, 蒋隽, 姚亚铃, 郭英, 李闯, 燕海峰. 雪峰乌骨鸡HSP70基因多态性与精液品质关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1378-1384.
[10]	王同林, 叶红霞, 郑积荣, 李明. 番茄果实中主要风味物质研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(8): 1513-1522.
[11]	顾赛麒, 王苏宁, 鲍嵘斌, 胡彬超, 杨晓霞, 张继磊, 陈景滢, 林招永, 丁玉庭, 柯志刚. 食品改良剂对丁香鱼干品质特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(7): 1263-1273.
[12]	韩立杰, 董伟欣, 张月辰. 不同水肥处理对小麦冠层结构、产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(6): 953-962.
[13]	邓倩, 王羊, 邓群仙, 辛亚宁, 李雷, 龙星雨, 祝进, 张慧芬, 夏惠, 梁东. 蜀脆枣果实发育规律及品质积累特性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 644-652.
[14]	任云, 李强, 李哲馨, 刘奕清, 唐建民. 不同世代生姜组培苗物质生产特性与产量形成差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 661-670.
[15]	王长进, 徐运林, 程昕昕, 周毅, 余海兵. 甜玉米种子营养品质主要性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 383-389.

有机、SEQ、特别与常规栽培对8种蔬菜产量、品质的影响

Effects of organic, SEQ, special and conventional farming on the yield and quality of eight kinds of vegetables

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价