缙云梅干菜腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240471

浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1336-1343.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240471

缙云梅干菜腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化

张程程¹(), 范涛², 章检明¹, 赵风亮², 忻晓庭¹, 牛海月¹, 刘大群¹^,^*()

1.浙江省农业科学院食品科学研究所,全省生鲜食品智慧物流与加工重点实验室,浙江杭州 310021
2.浙江菜味居农业开发有限公司,浙江丽水 321499

收稿日期:2024-05-28 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-08
作者简介:张程程(1990—),女,浙江开化人,博士,副研究员,主要从事蔬菜粮油加工方面的研究。E-mail:zccwsf@126.com
通讯作者: *刘大群,E-mail:liudaqun@zaas.ac.cn
基金资助:
浙江省“三农九方”农业科技协作计划(2024SNJF021)

Changes of bacterial community and quality during pickling process of Jinyun pickled and dried mustard

ZHANG Chengcheng¹(), FAN Tao², ZHANG Jianming¹, ZHAO Fengliang², XIN Xiaoting¹, NIU Haiyue¹, LIU Daqun¹^,^*()

1. Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Logistic and Processing, Institute of Food Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
2. Zhejiang Caiweiju Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., Lishui 321499, Zhejiang, China

Received:2024-05-28 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究缙云梅干菜茎、叶腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化,对腌制15 d内茎、叶部分的可滴定酸含量、pH值、亚硝酸盐含量、有机酸含量,以及细菌群落结构的动态变化进行监测。结果表明:缙云梅干菜的叶腌制9~12 d后达到成熟,此时,可滴定酸含量、pH值趋于稳定,亚硝酸盐含量较低(2.02~2.43 mg·L^-1),乳酸、乙酸等有机酸含量较高,乳杆菌属(Latilactobacillus)、魏斯氏菌属(Weissella)、乳球菌属(Lactococcus)、明串珠菌属(Leuconostoc)等有益的乳酸菌占优势,适宜用于下一步加工。茎的腌制成熟速度慢于叶,可滴定酸含量和有机酸含量总体低于叶,适宜的腌制时间为15 d。研究结果对缙云梅干菜的腌制加工和质量控制具有指导意义。

关键词: 茎, 叶, 腌制, 细菌群落, 品质

Abstract:

In order to explore the changes of bacterial community and quality during the pickling process of stem and leaf of Jinyun pickled and dried mustard, the dynamic changes of titratable acid, pH value, nitrite content, organic acid content and bacterial community structure in stem and leaf were monitored during the pickling process within 15 days. The results showed that the leaf could reach mature after pickling for 9-12 days, which was suitable for further processing. At this time, the titratable acid content and pH value were stable, and the nitrite content was low within 2.02-2.43 mg·L^-1. In addition, the content of organic acids such as lactic and acetic acid was high, and the beneficial lactic acid bacteria such as Latilactobacillus, Weissella, Lactococcus and Leuconostoc were dominant. The ripening rate of stem was slower than that of leaf, its titratable acid content and organic acid content were lower than those of leaf, and its appropriate pickling time was about 15 days. These findings could provide theoretical foundation for processing and quality control of Jinyun pickled and dried mustard.

Key words: stem, leaf, pickling, bacterial community, quality

中图分类号:

TS255.52

张程程, 范涛, 章检明, 赵风亮, 忻晓庭, 牛海月, 刘大群. 缙云梅干菜腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1336-1343.

ZHANG Chengcheng, FAN Tao, ZHANG Jianming, ZHAO Fengliang, XIN Xiaoting, NIU Haiyue, LIU Daqun. Changes of bacterial community and quality during pickling process of Jinyun pickled and dried mustard[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(6): 1336-1343.

图/表 5

图1 缙云梅干菜茎、叶腌制过程中pH值与可滴定酸含量的变化

Fig.1 Changes of pH value and titratable acidity content during pickling process of stem and leaf of Jinyun Meigancai

表1 茎、叶腌制过程中亚硝酸盐含量的变化

Table 1 Changes of nitrite content during pickling process of stem and leaf mg·L-1

t/d	亚硝酸盐含量Nitrite content
t/d	茎Stem	叶Leaf
1	219.77±0.29	8.16±2.02
3	92.79±18.19	4.45±0.09
6	1.86±0.12	2.41±0.13
9	1.92±0.08	2.02±0.32
12	2.34±1.88	2.43±1.17
15	2.07±0.67	3.08±0.36

图2 茎、叶腌制过程中细菌群落结构在门水平上的变化 Proteobacteria,变形菌门;Firmicutes,厚壁菌门;Bacteroidota,拟杆菌门;Actinobacteriota,放线菌门;Cyanobacteria,蓝菌门;Verrucomicrobiota,疣微菌门;Patescibacteria,髌骨细菌门;Desulfobacterota,脱硫杆菌门;Fusobacteriota,梭杆菌门;Nitrospirota,硝化螺旋菌门;Campylobacterota,弯曲菌门;Deferribacterota,脱铁杆菌门;Planctomycetota,浮霉菌门;Acidobacteriota,酸杆菌门;Spirochaetota,螺旋体门;unclassified,未分类;Chloroflexi,绿弯菌门;Synergistota,互养菌门;Gemmatimonadota,芽单胞菌门;Myxococcota,黏球菌门;Deinococcota,奇异球菌门;Bdellovibrionota,蛭弧菌门;Chlamydiae,衣原体门;Latescibacterota,迟杆菌门;Hydrogenedentes,食氢菌门;Others,其他。

Fig.2 Changes of bacterial communities in stem and leaf at phylum level

图3 茎、叶腌制过程中细菌群落结构在属水平上的变化 Latilactobacillus,乳杆菌属;Weissella,魏斯氏菌属;Xanthomonas,黄单胞菌属;Pseudomonas,假单胞菌属;Stenotrophomonas,寡养单胞菌属;Chryseobacterium,金黄杆菌属;Lactococcus,乳球菌属;Sphingobacterium,鞘氨醇杆菌属;Flavobacterium,黄杆菌属;Erwinia,欧文氏菌属;Enterobacteriaceae_unclassified,肠杆菌科未分类属;Serratia,沙雷氏菌属;Enterobacter,肠杆菌属;Sphingomonas,鞘氨醇单胞菌属;Duganella,杜擀氏菌属;Pedobacter,土地杆菌属;Pantoea,泛菌属;Rahnella,拉恩氏菌属;Leuconostoc,明串珠菌属;Pectobacterium,果胶杆菌属;Rhodococcus,红球菌属;Citrobacter,柠檬酸杆菌属;Hydrogenophaga,氢噬胞菌属;Carnobacterium,肉杆菌属;Brevundimonas,短波单胞菌属;Raoultella,拉乌尔菌属;Others,其他。

Fig.3 Changes of bacterial communities in stem and leaf at genus level

图4 茎、叶腌制过程中有机酸含量的变化

Fig.4 Changes of organic acid content during pickling process of stem and leaf

参考文献 20

[1]	周美琪, 周其德, 田赛莺, 等. 低盐腌制对缙云梅干菜加工品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(8): 1562-1571.
	ZHOU M Q, ZHOU Q D, TIAN S Y, et al. Effects of low-salt preserving on the qualities of Jinyun preserved Brassica junce[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(8): 1562-1571. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	刘力绮, 仝艳军, 杨瑞金. 不同产地梅干菜差异分析与营养评价[J]. 中国食品学报, 2023, 23(1): 343-355.
	LIU L Q, TONG Y J, YANG R J. Difference analysis and nutritional evaluation of the pickled and dried mustard from different areas[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2023, 23(1): 343-355. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	任爱清, 徐生可, 周亚君, 等. 菜干低盐腌制过程中品质影响因子的动态变化[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(7): 1414-1417.
	REN A Q, XU S K, ZHOU Y J, et al. Dynamic changes of influencing factors of pickled mustard quality during low-salt curing process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 61(7): 1414-1417. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	ZHANG C C, ZHANG J M, LIU D Q. Biochemical changes and microbial community dynamics during spontaneous fermentation of Zhacai, a traditional pickled mustard tuber from China[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2021, 347: 109199.
[5]	ZHANG J M, ZHANG C C, WU W C, et al. Correlation of the bacterial communities with umami components, and chemical characteristics in Zhejiang xuecai and fermented brine[J]. Food Research International, 2021, 140: 109986.
[6]	LIU D Q, ZHANG C C, ZHANG J M, et al. Metagenomics reveals the formation mechanism of flavor metabolites during the spontaneous fermentation of potherb mustard (Brassica juncea var. multiceps)[J]. Food Research International, 2021, 148: 110622.
[7]	曹晶晶, 木泰华, 马梦梅. 不同乳酸菌发酵对甘薯淀粉加工浆液营养功能成分及感官特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(18): 134-142.
	CAO J J, MU T H, MA M M. Effect of fermentation with different lactic acid bacteria starter cultures on nutritional and functional components and sensory characteristics of sweet potato slurry for starch production[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(18): 134-142. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	GUAN Q Q, ZHENG W D, HUANG T, et al. Comparison of microbial communities and physiochemical characteristics of two traditionally fermented vegetables[J]. Food Research International, 2020, 128: 108755.
[9]	忻晓庭, 刘大群, 张程程, 等. 我国特色发酵蔬菜降解亚硝酸盐菌株的筛选鉴定及应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 335-345.
	XIN X T, LIU D Q, ZHANG C C, et al. Screening, identification and application of high efficient nitrite degrading functional strains in Chinese characteristic fermented vegetables[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 335-345. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	SCHULLER H M. Nitrosamines as nicotinic receptor ligands[J]. Life Sciences, 2007, 80(24/25): 2274-2280.
[11]	HU X Y, WEI W, ZHANG J Y, et al. Nitrite self-degradation process in radish paocai under the synergistic regulation of prokaryotic microorganisms[J]. Food Bioscience, 2024, 57: 103612.
[12]	HUANG Y Y, JIA X Z, YU J J, et al. Effect of different lactic acid bacteria on nitrite degradation, volatile profiles, and sensory quality in Chinese traditional paocai[J]. LWT, 2021, 147: 111597.
[13]	FERNÁNDEZ M, HOSPITAL X F, CABALLERO N, et al. Potential of selected bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria to control Listeria monocytogenes in nitrite-reduced fermented sausages[J]. Food Control, 2023, 150: 109724.
[14]	刘大群, 张程程, 童川. 基于高通量测序分析不同盐量榨菜坯料中细菌群落多样性[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017, 17(12): 215-224.
	LIU D Q, ZHANG C C, TONG C. Analysis of bacterial community diversity in the picked mustard tuber with different salt content based on high throughput sequencing[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2017, 17(12): 215-224. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	畅若萌, 高炀, 陆彦均, 等. 两个不同品种辣椒盐渍过程中细菌群落及品质变化研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44(9): 167-176.
	CHANG R M, GAO Y, LU Y J, et al. Study on the bacterial community and quality changes of two kinds of chilli peppers during salting process[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(9): 167-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	LIANG H P, CHEN H Y, ZHANG W X, et al. Investigation on microbial diversity of industrial Zhacai paocai during fermentation using high-throughput sequencing and their functional characterization[J]. LWT, 2018, 91: 460-466.
[17]	MACORI G, COTTER P D. Novel insights into the microbiology of fermented dairy foods[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2018, 49: 172-178.
[18]	XIAO M Y, XIONG T, PENG Z, et al. Correlation between microbiota and flavours in fermentation of Chinese Sichuan Paocai[J]. Food Research International, 2018, 114: 123-132.
[19]	胡此海, 杨絮, 郭全友, 等. 四川泡菜母水的微生物群落与理化特性分析[J]. 中国食品学报, 2024, 24(2): 281-291.
	HU C H, YANG X, GUO Q Y, et al. Analysis of microbial community and physicochemical characteristics in Sichuan pickle brine[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2024, 24(2): 281-291. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	黄岩, 鲜双, 杜娟, 等. 不同温度与发酵方式制作的哈密瓜幼果泡菜品质比较[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2021, 52(11): 56-66.
	HUANG Y, XIAN S, DU J, et al. Comparison of qualities of Hami melon fruitlet pickles made at different temperatures and fermentation methods[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2021, 52(11): 56-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)

缙云梅干菜腌制过程中细菌群落与品质的变化

Changes of bacterial community and quality during pickling process of Jinyun pickled and dried mustard

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许卫猛, 徐妍, 陈国立. 基于多种分析方法的糯玉米品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1840-1848.
[2]	郑程, 汪颖, 王尖, 郭笑, 汪宝根, 吴新义, 祝彪, 李国景, 吴晓花. 瓠瓜EMS诱变突变体筛选与表型分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1914-1923.
[3]	朱为静, 吴佳, 洪春来, 朱凤香, 洪磊东, 张涛, 张硕, 诸惠芬. 秸秆覆盖对土壤水热肥及蟠桃产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1924-1932.
[4]	刘睿, 王丽娟, 王秋皓, 林旭东, 郭启航, 许多霖, 李文妍. 基于改进YOLOv8s的茶叶病虫害检测[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1933-1942.
[5]	王婷, 范宇鑫, 王惠, 杜荆山, 石秋环, 王玉洁, 申洪涛, 王艳芳, 奚家勤, 刘领. 甲基营养型芽孢杆菌对初烤微带青烟叶化学成分含量及协调性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(9): 1969-1980.
[6]	贺世雄, 杨蕾, 齐安民, 程籍, 王敏, 李英奎, 洪林. 中间砧对3种杂柑叶片光合特性、理化指标和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1680-1693.
[7]	张顺昌, 徐继根, 符成悦, 蒲占湑, 胡丽鹏, 吴昊, 李俊兵, 辛亮, 雷元军. 喷施氨基酸钙对红美人杂柑果皮龟裂与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1706-1715.
[8]	严福林, 郎云虎, 简应权, 陈雄飞, 魏巍, 王志威, 安江勇, 任得强, 丁宁, 魏升华. 八爪金龙药材产量与品质对土壤理化性状的响应[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1766-1775.
[9]	王呈阳, 刘洁雅, 吴敏怡, 谢博伊, 洪德成, 冷锋, 吴国泉. 钙处理对涝害下寒香蜜葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1451-1458.
[10]	周航, 贾涛, 方蒋平, 杨永锋, 余洋洋, 裘垚, 陈思原, 冯魏, 张静远, 陈红丽. 烟叶霉变病拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定、培养条件优化及其防治效果研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1481-1491.
[11]	沈国强, 汪明德, 关雅文, 武军, 王汉荣. 高粱弯孢叶斑病病原菌鉴定、生物学特性研究及防治药剂筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(7): 1492-1500.
[12]	张若楠, 门小明, 秦凯鹏, 王彬彬, 吴杰, 丁向彬, 徐子伟, 齐珂珂. 绿嘉黑猪的不同杂交组合生长性能、胴体品质、产肉性能和收益比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211.
[13]	项缨, 丛建民, 潘丹红, 陶永刚. 春大棚有机种植不同品种番茄的生育进程分析和综合评价研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1252-1261.
[14]	刘文琦, 胡齐赞, 岳智臣, 陶鹏, 雷娟利, 李必元, 赵彦婷, 王华森. 夏季高温对叶用芥菜外观与营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1262-1271.
[15]	邹俊燕, 王筠竹, 赵婉秋, 尹志浩, 杜建科, 孙崇波. 兰科植物原球茎和类原球茎研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1372-1389.