浙江农业学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 2275-2282.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20240728
刘慧春(
), 许雯婷, 周江华, 温小蕙, 史小华, 朱开元(
)
收稿日期:2024-07-25
出版日期:2025-11-25
发布日期:2025-12-08
作者简介:刘慧春(1979—),女,湖北武汉人,博士,副研究员,主要从事江南牡丹资源收集、遗传育种及抗逆性机理研究。E-mail:lhuichun@163.com
通讯作者:
*朱开元,E-mail: kyzhu1999@163.com
基金资助:
LIU Huichun(
), XU Wenting, ZHOU Jianghua, WEN Xiaohui, SHI Xiaohua, ZHU Kaiyuan(
)
Received:2024-07-25
Online:2025-11-25
Published:2025-12-08
摘要: 在建成江南牡丹种质资源圃的基础上,利用耐涝性较强的江南观赏牡丹品种与油用牡丹凤丹进行品种间杂交,试图将耐涝的优良基因引入油用牡丹品种中,以培育出耐涝性强的油用牡丹新品种。主要杂交组合有:大富贵×凤丹、玉楼春×凤丹、一品红×凤丹、红芙蓉×凤丹。结果表明:不同的杂交组合,其结实率、种子发芽率和杂交实生苗的耐涝性各不相同,4种杂交组合的结实率都在70%以上,其中玉楼春×凤丹的结实率达到了85%;种子发芽率在60%~80%,其中杂交组合玉楼春×凤丹获得的种子发芽率达到了80%;与凤丹母本相比,杂交获得的实生苗耐涝性均得到了提高,其植株的耐涝性生理指标如蔗糖合成酶(SS)、α-淀粉酶(RAMY)、乙醇脱氢酶(ADH)和丙酮酸脱羧酶(PDC)均显著高于对照凤丹,表现最为明显的是一品红×凤丹,其次是玉楼春×凤丹。本研究结果获得了耐涝的凤丹新种质,为雨水较多的南方地区特别是江南地区提供了品种资源,从而从根本上解决油用牡丹所面临的涝害问题,为油用牡丹的产业发展提供了有力的资源保障。
中图分类号:
刘慧春, 许雯婷, 周江华, 温小蕙, 史小华, 朱开元. 利用杂交育种创制耐涝凤丹种质[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(11): 2275-2282.
LIU Huichun, XU Wenting, ZHOU Jianghua, WEN Xiaohui, SHI Xiaohua, ZHU Kaiyuan. Cultivar development of waterlogging tolerant germplasm of Paeonia ostii cv. Fengdan by hybirid breeding[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(11): 2275-2282.
| 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 授粉数量 Pollination quantity | 果荚数量 Number of fruit pods | 种子数量 Number of seeds | 种子质量 Weight of seeds/g | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 单粒重 Single seed weight/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFG×FD | 50 | 35 | 989 | 440.97 | 70.00 | 0.445 9 |
| YLC×FD | 100 | 85 | 2 512 | 1 113.58 | 85.00 | 0.443 3 |
| YPH×FD | 60 | 43 | 1 395 | 621.38 | 71.66 | 0.445 4 |
| HFR×FD | 80 | 60 | 896 | 416.36 | 75.00 | 0.464 7 |
表1 不同杂交组合的结实情况
Table 1 Hybrid results of different combinations
| 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 授粉数量 Pollination quantity | 果荚数量 Number of fruit pods | 种子数量 Number of seeds | 种子质量 Weight of seeds/g | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 单粒重 Single seed weight/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFG×FD | 50 | 35 | 989 | 440.97 | 70.00 | 0.445 9 |
| YLC×FD | 100 | 85 | 2 512 | 1 113.58 | 85.00 | 0.443 3 |
| YPH×FD | 60 | 43 | 1 395 | 621.38 | 71.66 | 0.445 4 |
| HFR×FD | 80 | 60 | 896 | 416.36 | 75.00 | 0.464 7 |
| 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 播种数量 Sowing quantity | 出苗数量 Number of emerging seedlings | 发芽率 Germination rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| DFG×FD | 150 | 91 | 60.67 |
| YLC×FD | 150 | 120 | 80.00 |
| YPH×FD | 150 | 118 | 78.67 |
| HFR×FD | 150 | 93 | 62.00 |
表2 不同杂交组合的种子发芽率
Table 2 Germination rate of different hybrid combinations
| 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 播种数量 Sowing quantity | 出苗数量 Number of emerging seedlings | 发芽率 Germination rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| DFG×FD | 150 | 91 | 60.67 |
| YLC×FD | 150 | 120 | 80.00 |
| YPH×FD | 150 | 118 | 78.67 |
| HFR×FD | 150 | 93 | 62.00 |
图1 牡丹涝害处理的表型变化 A,FD凤丹实生苗; B,YPH×FD杂交后代; C,YLC×FD杂交后代。
Fig.1 Phenotypic changes of peony hybrid offspring under waterlogging treatment A, FD seedlings; B, YPH×FD hybrid offspring; C, YLC×FD hybrid offspring.
| 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 组别 Group | 初始株高 Initial height/ cm | 最终株高 Final height/ cm | 叶绿素相对含量 Single photon avalanche diode | 根系长度 Root length/cm | 根冠比 Root/shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YLC×FD | 涝害处理组Treatment group | 11.5 | 11.5 | 5.26 | 16.00 | 1.46 |
| 对照组Control group | 11.5 | 11.8 | 5.24 | 21.17 | 1.85 | |
| YPH×FD | 涝害处理组Treatment group | 11.0 | 11.0 | 7.20 | 17.50 | 1.56 |
| 对照组Control group | 11.0 | 11.2 | 6.40 | 24.00 | 1.80 | |
| FD | 涝害处理组Treatment group | 12.0 | 12.0 | 5.98 | 20.33 | 1.29 |
| 对照组Control group | 12.0 | 12.3 | 6.54 | 23.17 | 1.88 |
表3 牡丹杂交后代涝害处理的形态指标测定
Table 3 Morphological indicators of different peony hybrid combinations
| 杂交组合 Hybrid combination | 组别 Group | 初始株高 Initial height/ cm | 最终株高 Final height/ cm | 叶绿素相对含量 Single photon avalanche diode | 根系长度 Root length/cm | 根冠比 Root/shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YLC×FD | 涝害处理组Treatment group | 11.5 | 11.5 | 5.26 | 16.00 | 1.46 |
| 对照组Control group | 11.5 | 11.8 | 5.24 | 21.17 | 1.85 | |
| YPH×FD | 涝害处理组Treatment group | 11.0 | 11.0 | 7.20 | 17.50 | 1.56 |
| 对照组Control group | 11.0 | 11.2 | 6.40 | 24.00 | 1.80 | |
| FD | 涝害处理组Treatment group | 12.0 | 12.0 | 5.98 | 20.33 | 1.29 |
| 对照组Control group | 12.0 | 12.3 | 6.54 | 23.17 | 1.88 |
图2 涝害胁迫下牡丹杂交后代的生理指标 短栅上的不同小写字母表示在相同处理时间内不同植株间在P<0.05水平差异有统计学意义;n=3。
Fig.2 Physiological index of peony hybrid offspring under waterlogging stress Different lowercase letters above the bars represent significant differences between different plants at the same treatment time at the 0.05 probability level; n=3.
| [1] | 韩继刚, 李晓青, 刘炤, 等. 牡丹油用价值及其应用前景[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2014, 27(5): 21-25. |
| HAN J G, LI X Q, LIU Z, et al. Potential applications of tree peony as an oil plant[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2014, 27(5): 21-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 李育材. 中国油用牡丹研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019: 94-95. |
| [3] | 韩晨静, 孟庆华, 陈雪梅, 等. 我国油用牡丹研究利用现状与产业发展对策[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(10): 125-132. |
| HAN C J, MENG Q H, CHEN X M, et al. Research and utilization progresses and industrial development strategies of oilseed peony in China[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 47(10): 125-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 刘德晶. 我国油用牡丹产业发展若干问题的思考[J]. 中国林业产业, 2015(1): 67-71. |
| LIU D J. Thoughts on the development of the oil tree peonyindustry in China[J]. China Forestry Industry, 2015(1): 67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 王晓晖, 王占营, 吴建梅. 传统育种方法在油用牡丹新品种选育中的应用[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(6): 30-31. |
| WANG X H, WANG Z Y, WU J M. Application of traditional breeding methods in breeding new varieties of oil peony[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 25(6): 30-31. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | 张晶晶, 王亮生, 刘政安. 牡丹花色研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(6): 1383-1388. |
| ZHANG J J, WANG L S, LIU Z A. Recent advances in flower color research of tree peony[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2006, 33(6): 1383-1388. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 刘欣. 牡丹杂交亲本筛选及部分杂种苗SSR鉴定[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. |
| LIU X. Screening of hybrid parents and SSR identification of some hybrid seedlings of Paeonia suffruticosa[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 刘欣, 钟原, 成仿云. 卵叶牡丹杂交育种初步研究[C]// 2016年中国观赏园艺学术研讨会论文集, 2016:153-156. |
| [9] | 吴静, 成仿云, 张栋. ‘正午’牡丹的杂交利用及部分杂种AFLP鉴定[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(8): 1551-1557. |
| WU J, CHENG F Y, ZHANG D. Utilizing ‘high noon’ in the crossing breeding of tree peonies and early identification of some hybrids by AFLP markers[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(8): 1551-1557. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | GUO L L, GUO D L, YIN W L, et al. Tolerance strategies revealed in tree peony (Paeonia Suffruticosa; Paeoniaceae) ecotypes differentially adapted to desiccation[J]. Applications in Plant Sciences, 2018, 6(10): e01191. |
| [11] | JIN Q J, XUE Z Y, DONG C L, et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs from tree peony (Paeonia ostii) and their response to copper stress[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(2): e0117584. |
| [12] | 张海玲, 李薇, 高本旺, 等. 42个牡丹品种叶部抗病性选育试验[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2017, 46(4): 44-46. |
| ZHANG H L, LI W, GAO B W, et al. Breeding experiment of leaf resistance for forty-two peony cultivars[J]. Hubei Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 46(4): 44-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 刘建鑫. 芍药属植物远缘杂交育种与杂交亲和性、F1真实性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. |
| LIU J X. Far distance hybridization breeding and hybridization affinity, F1 authenticity research of Paeonia plants[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016. | |
| [14] | HAO Q, PENG L P, LI Z, et al. Paternal effects on fatty acid composition of tree peony seed oil[J]. Euphytica, 2019, 215(7): 131. |
| [15] | 戚杰, 何新颖, 宣亚楠, 等. 油用兼观赏型凤丹牡丹杂交育种研究初探[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(3): 67-74. |
| QI J, HE X Y, XUAN Y N, et al. Preliminary investigation on cross breeding of a new oil and ornamental tree peony of Paeonia ostii Fengdan[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 44(3): 67-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 王萍, 王荣, 刘庆华, 等. 几个牡丹品种耐涝性的比较[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2008, 27(2): 309-312. |
| WANG P, WANG R, LIU Q H, et al. Comparative study on submergence tolerance of tree peony cultivars[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008, 27(2): 309-312. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 朱向涛, 金松恒, 哀建国, 等. 牡丹不同品种耐涝性综合评价[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(3): 607-613. |
| ZHU X T, JIN S H, AI J G, et al. Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of peony variety[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(3): 607-613. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 裴姿琛, 刘泽, 李保会. 不同水分条件下‘凤丹’牡丹生长规律及生理差异[J]. 林业与生态科学, 2020, 35(1): 79-85. |
| PEI Z C, LIU Z, LI B H. Growth rule and physiological difference of ‘Fengdan’ peony under different water conditions[J]. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2020, 35(1): 79-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 卓仁英, 陈益泰. 木本植物抗涝性研究进展[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(2): 215-222. |
| ZHUO R Y, CHEN Y T. Advances in waterlogging-resistance of woody plants[J]. Forest Research, 2001, 14(2): 215-222. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 杜克兵. 杨树杂交育种及杨树耐涝性的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2008. |
| DU K B. Study on poplar hybrid breeding and poplar waterlogging tolerance[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 刘慧春, 谭晨, 张加强, 等. 金华地区10个江南牡丹观花及油用品种的SSR分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(21): 7115-7120. |
| LIU H C, TAN C, ZHANG J Q, et al. SSR analysis of 10 ornamental and oil cultivars of peony in South China in Jinhua area[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(21): 7115-7120. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | 韩欣, 成仿云, 肖佳佳, 等. 以‘凤丹白’为母本的杂交及其育种潜力分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(4): 121-125. |
| HAN X, CHENG F Y, XIAO J J, et al. Hybridization with ‘Fengdanbai’ as female parent and its breeding potential analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 121-125. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 董兆磊. ‘凤丹’(Paeonia ostii ‘Feng Dan’)生殖生物学的初步研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010. |
| DONG Z L. Preliminary study on reproductive biology of Paeonia ostii ‘Feng Dan’[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010. | |
| [24] | 尹原森, 徐静静, 汪成忠. 不同种源地凤丹后代种子在苏州萌发试验研究[J]. 现代园艺, 2021(5): 6-8. |
| YIN Y S, XU J J, WANG C Z. Experimental study on seed germination of Fengdan progeny from different provenances in Suzhou[J]. Mordern Horticulture, 2021(5): 6-8. (in Chinese) | |
| [25] | 何智宏, 何丽霞, 张延东, 等. 牡丹新品种‘余霞散绮’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 219-220. |
| HE Z H, HE L X, ZHANG Y D, et al. A new peony variety ‘Yuxia Sanqi’[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 219-220. (in Chinese) | |
| [26] | 利容千, 王建波. 植物逆境细胞及生理学[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2002. |
| [27] | 汪天, 王素平, 郭世荣, 等. 植物低氧胁迫伤害与适应机理的研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(4): 847-853. |
| WANG T, WANG S P, GUO S R, et al. Research advances about hypoxia-stress damage and hypoxia-stress-adapting mechanism in plants[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006, 26(4): 847-853. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 张洁. 景天属植物对水涝胁迫的响应机理研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019. |
| ZHANG J. Study on response mechanism of sedum to waterlogging stress[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 刘晓慧, 伍海兵, 张圣美, 等. 淹水胁迫对丝瓜幼苗生长及呼吸酶活性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(3): 48-54. |
| LIU X H, WU H B, ZHANG S M, et al. Effects of waterlogging stress on growth and respiratory enzyme activities of Luffa seedlings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2020, 32(3): 48-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 僧珊珊, 王群, 张永恩, 等. 外源亚精胺对淹水胁迫玉米的生理调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(6): 1042-1050. |
| SENG S S, WANG Q, ZHANG Y E, et al. Effects of exogenous spermidine on physiological regulatory of maize after waterlogging stress[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(6): 1042-1050. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 赵福康, 梅欢, 张晓莹, 傅巧娟. 秀珍菇菌渣用作杂交兰组培苗栽培基质的可行性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(8): 1716-1722. |
| [2] | 张若楠, 门小明, 秦凯鹏, 王彬彬, 吴杰, 丁向彬, 徐子伟, 齐珂珂. 绿嘉黑猪的不同杂交组合生长性能、胴体品质、产肉性能和收益比较研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 1203-1211. |
| [3] | 王闻琦, 王盼盼, 张严玲, 刘青青, 洪双双, 赵高鹏, 刘泓畅, 王翠玲. 玉米生物钟基因ZmPRR1-2互作蛋白质的筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(5): 977-986. |
| [4] | 兰雪成, 赵凤亮, 张光旭, 李杨, 郭晓红. 纳米氧化锌和纳米氧化硅对水稻种子萌发的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 269-277. |
| [5] | 王苗苗, 秦嘉泽, 郭佳琪, 于天成. 杓唇石斛开花特性与繁育系统研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(1): 103-114. |
| [6] | 李菊, 毕冬琳, 杨晓莉, 杨东亮, 张潇文, 刘方程, 李琼毅, 柏家林. 小反刍兽疫病毒非结构蛋白C单克隆抗体的制备与鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(5): 1047-1054. |
| [7] | 廖雪环, 张坷塬, 阿尔力色, 周林, 杨尔倮, 邓俊, 张荣萍. 柯杈肥与功能肥复配对杂交稻生长与产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(11): 2447-2455. |
| [8] | 罗英杰, 崔维军, 王忠华, 吴月燕, 林宏友, 周洁, 严成其, 王栩鸣. 水稻泛素连接酶D3与抗病相关蛋白VOZ2的互作分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(1): 9-17. |
| [9] | 马启良, 杨小明, 胡水星, 黄子鸿, 祁亨年. 基于Mask RCNN和视觉技术的玉米种子发芽自动检测方法[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1927-1936. |
| [10] | 李崇娟, 吕凤仙, 杨鼎, 张丽琴, 兰梅, 杨红丽, 徐学忠, 胡靖锋, 申时品, 吴毓飞, 和江明, 董相书. 萝卜胞质雄性不育(Ogura CMS)芥菜材料的创制[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(5): 1058-1068. |
| [11] | 林东璞, 臧要强, 张霄鹏, 周徐子鑫, 马均. 红苞凤梨AbF3'5'H基因上游调控因子筛选[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(1): 79-89. |
| [12] | 袁崇渊, 祝愿飞, 陈霞, 朱婵, 王毅, 陶海燕, 余娇娇. 玉米ZmNLP5与ZmSTP1、ZmAAP2基因启动子区域相互作用的鉴定[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(11): 2340-2347. |
| [13] | 郑文寅, 曾令楠, 程颖, 侯丞志, 曹文昕, 赵莉, 姚大年. 小麦籽粒类胡萝卜素含量的遗传分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 2088-2094. |
| [14] | 陈纪鹏, 刘小林, 李生强, 刘显军, 胡月清, 陈桃. 白菜型油菜黄芽白与甘蓝型油菜湘油15种间杂交及其杂种后代的遗传学特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(7): 1170-1176. |
| [15] | 汪峰, 谌江华, 陈若霞, 史骏, 任少鹏, 金树权, 姚红燕, 朱德峰, 戴瑶璐. 减氮对甬优籼粳杂交稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(6): 984-992. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||